RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

“Who Can We Trust Anymore?”

I’m not at all happy with politicians these days. But there are a few I trust to be courageous and sincere, even if I don’t always agree with all of their positions. Joe Sestak (D-PA) is one of them. He is taking on Arlen I-was-Republican-until I realized I couldn’t win another term-so-I-became-a-DemocratSpecter in the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania.

I liked his press release from yesterday. It is readily comprehensible with a lot of down-home common sense. We don’t see enough of that these days. What do you think?

In anticipation of the President Obama’s State of the Union Address, Joe Sestak issued the following statement:

“In 2008, America voted for change. Not just a change of parties or policies, but for a fundamental change in politics and the way we do business in Washington. America voted to end the systemic lack of oversight, transparency and accountability — both in Congress and the previous Administration — that brought about the crises we face today. This was not a mandate, but an opportunity — a chance to put our principles over politics as usual, to restore faith in our nation’s leaders and public institutions. Congress has not delivered. Too many in Washington have strayed from principled compromise to a compromise of principles. Too many have forgotten that it is jobs for American workers that matters, not our own. Tonight, the President has an opportunity to put our country back on a path of real change by declaring a renewed commitment to transparency and accountability and putting our focus back on America’s working families.

“First and foremost, the President must make job growth and long-term financial security our top priorities. Only then can we improve the economic, health, education, environmental/energy, and defense security of our families. To rein in deficit and debt spending while ensuring quality job creation with real income growth, we must:

• Implement a statutory “pay-as-you-go” (PAYGO) rule that requires an offset for all new government spending and expand PAYGO to cover all spending — both mandatory and discretionary.

• Immediately restore our economic growth and stability by implementing a job creation plan that strengthens small business hiring, implements job share programs, saves jobs by closing state budget deficits and ensuring consumer confidence by providing relief to job seekers. Doing so could support 10.9 million jobs over the next two years — 582,000 jobs each month — as America did in the 1950s under President Truman.

• Address entitlement spending by reining in health care costs to prevent the federal debt from reaching 279 percent of GDP in 2050, from 46 percent of GDP at the end of fiscal year 2009.

• Close tax loopholes that ship jobs overseas by preventing corporations from deferring taxes on income earned by foreign subsidiaries as long as it stays off the company’s U.S. books.

• End the Bush tax cuts that went to the top 1% of income earners. This includes reforming the capital gains tax rate and adjusting the marginal tax rate to the level it was under President Clinton for those earning more than $1 million.

• End the earmark system and gradually replace it with an objective, competitive grant process that removes political influence and ensures that all projects stand on their merits

Beyond the immediate urgency of restoring our long-term financial security, the President’s agenda must focus on the five pillars of security outlined above. These include:

Defense
• Recently, President Obama made the difficult commitment to deploy an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. As a former Admiral, I supported this measured increase, because the status quo in Afghanistan was sliding backward and would never have produced conditions for us to securely withdraw, particularly because of the situation in Pakistan and the safe haven Al-Qaeda has secured there.
• However, I look forward to hearing the President’s details on how he will define our ultimate success, and the outline of an exit strategy that gives us benchmarks for measuring success or failure-because this cannot be an open-ended commitment-so that we can leave behind conditions in Afghanistan which will prevent the return of Al-Qaeda.
• This week, the President announced his plan to freeze discretionary spending in a number of areas. Defense spending was not included. However, the President’s agenda must provide assurances to the American taxpayers that we will focus our defense budget on quality rather than quantity of acquisitions. Last year was a model of such “smart spending,” with an ambitious reform budget proposed by Secretary Gates which concentrated on requirements in the field and passage by Congress of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009.
• Finally, the President’s agenda must improve our response to bioterrorism attacks and public heath threats, the need for which was recently highlighted by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism.

Health
• With as many as 14,000 individuals losing their health insurance every day and as much as $130 billion of economic productivity lost every year because of the uninsured, we need a clear path forward to implement urgently needed reforms for our health care system. The President should have a firm hand on the tiller and propose a legislative plan for improving consumer protections, expanding competition in the insurance market and a reducing in the number of uninsured Americans.

Education
• With 60 percent of all new jobs requiring some form of post-secondary education and the U.S. estimated to fall 16 million college degrees short of workforce needs in 2025, access to higher education is essential to continued economic success. Ensuring that we can meet these needs will require strong leadership from President Obama on expanding access to high quality early education programs, improving the way we hold teachers and schools accountable for the education of our nation’s children, and making college more affordable. Ensuring children coming to school ready to learn and enforcing realistic accountability for our nation’s teachers will allow the U.S. economy the opportunity to rebound.

Energy, Environment and Transportation
• We need to continue to move toward a competitive and sustainable economy with the passage of meaningful comprehensive energy legislation that contains a strong national renewable energy standard, provides incentives for the development of the next generation of energy generation and efficiency technology, and restores the United States to a position of global leadership in creating a clean, unlimited energy supply.
• We must ensure that as we take the necessary steps to rebuild our economy and return people to work, that we do not do so in a way that degrades our recent progress in protecting and preserving our environment and health. As we retool our economy for global success, we must rededicate ourselves to national and regional transportation planning that fosters economic growth and meets the needs of the future, not just transportation spending for spending’s sake. We should create more regional airport systems and first-class ports connected by quality high-speed rail systems. We need an integrated and well-designed road transportation system that not only moves people more effectively, but also minimize accidents and integrates all modes of transportation. And we must do it in a way that brings all the players together in an open and transparent process.

Joe Sestak was elected to Congress in 2006 after a distinguished 31-year career in the United States Navy, and he is honored to represent the Southeastern Pennsylvania district where he was born and raised. He is a Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate seat from Pennsylvania. During his Navy career, Joe attained the rank of 3-star Admiral, served in the White House as Director for Defense Policy on President Clinton’s National Security Council, served in the Pentagon as Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, and led a series of operational commands at sea, culminating in command of the USS George Washington Aircraft Carrier Battle Group (30 ships, 100 aircraft, and 15,000 sailors/marines/aviators/SEALs) during combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. In our nation’s time of crisis in the immediate aftermath of 9/11, the Navy turned to Joe Sestak to serve as the first Director of “Deep Blue,” the Navy anti-terrorism unit formed in response to the attacks. Joe is the highest-ranking former military officer ever elected to either branch of Congress. He graduated second in his class from the U.S. Naval Academy and holds a Master’s in Public Administration and a PhD in Political Economy and Government from Harvard University. Joe lives in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, with his wife, Susan, and daughter, Alex, and proudly represents the 7th District, where his mother and many of his seven siblings still reside.

  • Howard R.

    You are wrong that Oboma can change the no tell regulations

    Don’t ask, don’t tell (DADT) is the common term for the policy banning openly gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals from serving in the United States military, as mandated by federal law Pub.L. 103-160 (10 U.S.C. § 654). Unless one of the exceptions from 10 U.S.C. § 654(b) applies, the policy prohibits anyone who “demonstrate(s) a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts” from serving in the armed forces of the United States, because “it would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.” The act prohibits any homosexual or bisexual person from disclosing his or her sexual orientation or from speaking about any homosexual relationships, including marriages or other familial attributes, while serving in the United States armed forces. The “don’t ask” part of the policy indicates that superiors should not initiate investigation of a service member’s orientation in the absence of disallowed behaviors, though credible and articulable evidence of homosexual behavior may cause an investigation. Violations of this aspect through persecutions and harrassment of suspected servicemen and women resulted in the policy’s current formulation as don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue, don’t harass.
     

  • creeper

    Well, I have a little more faith in Tom Harkin, D-Iowa these days.  He voted against the president’s @ss-covering scheme to create a commission to make recommendations for slashing costs.  That one was nothing more than an attempt to get cover for the upcoming cuts to Social Security.  Maybe Harkin’s not totally honest but he’s not stupid, either.

    Now, as for my congressman Bruce Braley…(raspberry)

  • creeper

    Pea Yes…I’d vote for anyone over Specter.  I will NEVER forgive him for the way he treated Anita Hill. 

  • creeper

    Howard R.:  Thank you very much for this.  It appears that repealing DADT could result in a return to the previous practices…which it was intended to circumvent.

    So I won’t bash Obama as hypocritical but neither will I hold my breath until he makes a serious effort to change 10 U.S.C. § 654.

  • Ladydawnelle

    as for Joe S – Navy! 
    he once was one of my FAV DONKEYs
    but even HE seemed weak when he was defending “something” Odrama-mess the other day and I pretty much LOST the last of my respect for him.  He should be stronger.  When a lone housewife/mother from bumtruck, alaska can walk in and speak TRUTH To POWER why couldn’t you JOE?  You are a VET for GOD sake!!!!  argh!

  • Sassy

    Mr. Sestak will be up against democrats who are backing “defector” Specter as well as the republican candidate, who is leading both in the polls, I believe.

  • Linda Anselmi

    I’m with you Pat – I like Joe Sestak.

    I don’t always agree with him on everything, but I definitely think he’s a leader that has the right heart and head to understand the problems we face and the management experience to get what is needed done for our country.   

    Personally, I’d love to see him buck the system more.  And more publicly.  Let the passion of his convictions and independence shine through.  So the people of PA and the US have no doubts that he works for them – and not business interests, NOT THE DEM PARTY — and not the President!  

  • Solara 9

    I lOVE Joe Sestak!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :) :) :) :) :)

  • Rich

    I agree with you Pat.  I have a lot of friends in PA and they are turning towards him because of his experence and courage to stand up (most of the time) for the right causes.

  • Craig Della Penna

    But he could follow Eisenhower’s example (he likes Republican presidents) on race relations when Eisenhower banned racial discrimination in the US armed forces – as CiC. That, btw, set the stage for the civil rights legislation that followed a decade later.

    Obama, acting as CiC could, very simply, ban LGBT discrimination in the armed forces – they’ll kick and scream about it, just like they did in the ’50s but if it’s an order, they’ll find a way to do it.

  • WhatNow

    I read Joe’s comments in this article. Not knowing who Joe is, this is my impression of him, UGH!!! I got the impression he just regurgitated what Obama said in his SOTU, BEFORE Obama said it. Another talking points memo before the speech.

  • Tricia

    Whatnow…Look at his record in the House and you will change your mind!

  • FLDemFem

    But he won’t, it might lose him some votes. Not that he has many left to lose, but that’s the way he thinks. Not whether it’s right or wrong, but whether it is a political risk for him. It’s all about him, not about the people who are being discriminated against. It’s always all about him. It has always been about him.

  • mountainaires

    Yeah, I like Sestak too.  :)

    He’s serious; he’s credible; he’s got military experience, which I respect, as a veteran; he’s clearly a man of integrity on the issues; I couldn’t detect an inch of hypocrisy or ideological extremism in the proposals he suggested.

  • timmy

     I say vote for Joe so we can bury Arlen for good. Then in the general election vote the Republican Candiate – sticking it to Obama…. That’s how we punish this suckers.

  • HC123

    I find him full of platitudes and no real information.

    “We must ensure that as we take the necessary steps to rebuild our economy and return people to work, that we do not do so in a way that degrades our recent progress in protecting and preserving our environment and health.”

    Meaning?

    “Immediately restore our economic growth and stability by implementing a job creation plan that strengthens small business hiring, implements job share programs, saves jobs by closing state budget deficits and ensuring consumer confidence by providing relief to job seekers”

    That actually sounds negative to me, depending on how he plans to implement it. And he goes on and on with it.

    I would take him over Specter but he really doesnt say anything meaningful here, just a lot of “chicken in every pot” talk so he can get elected.

  • PA Caucasian

    I live in Sestak’s district. We’ve witnessed him morph from a congressman who delivers excellent constiutent service to a politician determined to become Pennsylvania’s next U.S. Senator. To this end, he has become expert at the art of rhetorical doublespeak and obfuscation.

    If anyone wants to take the measure of the man, check his voting record in Congress. He has rubber-stamped the 0bama/Pelosi/Reid agenda. I agree with you, this statement is platitude long and solution short. Because I’m in his district, I have access to his local media appearances. He was on talk radio two days after Scott Brown’s win. He would not recognize that Brown’s win was due largely to the MA voters’ resistance to the Health Reform monstrosity cooked up in the Reid/Pelosi mad science lab.

    When he was asked 0bama’s major contribution in his first year in office, he said: “The Recognition of Change”. What the hell does that mean? Sestak is walking a fine line in a state that is NOT solid blue.
    We’ve seen what can happen in NJ and MA, two states that have a more secure claim to being Democrat strongholds. If current voter sentiment obtains, PA is headed for a big smackdown of the Dem Senate candidate in 2010.

    So Sestak’s first challenge is the Dem primary. This statement was designed to position himself as the anti-Specter. He is trying to woo the centrist Democrats while at the same time asserting himself as the “real” democrat in light of whom he is opposing. I don’t know how he’s going to win the AAs in Philadelphia. Since the White House is behind Specter, the precinct committeemen already have their marching orders, and will direct their voters accordingly.

    Sestak is a politician, nothing more, nothing less. He has a difficult road ahead of him. Is he a better candidate than Specter? No doubt. But no one should be fooled that this man somehow is above the fray, because he isn’t.

  • Anonymous

    That’s my plan, too.

  • PA Caucasian

    He continued his misogynistic attacks just last week against Michelle Bachman. I believe he called her to apologize, there was such an uproar over his abuse of her.

  • PA Caucasian

    When has he ever opposed anything on Pelosi’s agenda?

    He’s only started to sound anti-Pelosi when the polls showed public sentiment growing against the Health Care so-called Reform Bill. Then began a lot of noise about transparency, etc. etc.

    He voted for the stimulus bill when calls to his office were 10 to 1 against.

  • nickoury

    Ditto, I’m also in his district, and fell exactly the same.

  • Katmoon

    Trust yourself; only give those a give those a chance in politics who have earned it.

    ~The people when rightly and fully trusted will return the trust ~
     Abraham Lincoln

  • helenk

    http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2010/01/27/corporation-files-to-run-for-congress-important-marketing-strategy-questions-remain-unanswered/

    I am not sure if this will running for office in one of the seven states without representation that backtrack mentioned when he talked about the 57 states

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • Solara 9

    Campaigning is very difficult–you have to play an ugly game.  But he IS who your Rep IS.  Great service. That’s him.

    If you don’t want Specter, might be a good idea to help Joe out.

  • Solara 9

    Katmoon–Sestak has earned that chance as a Rep.  And he is a Democrat, but he stands up often enough. Joe Sestak, Jim Webb, and Russ Feingold have more backbone than the rest.

  • PA Caucasian

    When I listened to him the other night I so wanted him to come out and speak plainly and directly to the audience. His office has helped my family, that’s how I’ve come to appreciate the constiutent services.
    But his presentation was just weaselly, there’s no other way to say it.

    And unfortunately for real fans of Sestak, the current President seems hellbent on destroying his party. I do applaud Sestak for standing up to the White House. He is under pressure from the Dem machine to withdraw from the Senate race and essentially has told them to stuff it.

  • getfitnow

    Yes, Pat Toomey. I’m no familiar with him.

  • PA Caucasian

    Who has to play an ugly game? Brown, Christie and McDonnell played it straight, and they won by convincing margins.

    Your comment sounds as if you believe Sestak is being ugly.

  • Boxer Mum 06

    That is actually what I’m going to do Timmy! I’m still a registered Democrat so I’m able to vote in the Primary in PA. I will vote for Joe over Specter any day!!!! Plus, Joe was a very strong Hillary supporter so that needs to be said as well. This is another reason the D Machine will try to knock Joe out of the race in favor of Specter. They are very opposed to Joe running in this race – it’s pay back time for good ole Arlen.  Come election time though, I’m thinking I have to pull the lever for Toomey – although I’m not a fan of his. From what I’ve heard he is very conservative and it may be a hold your nose a vote time. We have to send a strong message to DC! If for no other reason, another R win will help this message. Sadly, I’m not at all convinced if Joe did get elected, he wouldn’t be pulled into the rip tide and vote Obama all the way.

  • PA Caucasian

    This was in the Daily News yesterday:

    Terry Madonna, a PA poller, sees an enthusiasm gap in the ranks of Democrats.
    “Madonna notes that 47 percent of the registered Republicans in the poll said that they were likely to vote in the Nov. 2 general election, while only 35 percent of the Democrats felt the same way. He attributes that to national news of Democrats’ struggling to implement their policies in Washington despite control of the White House and Congress.”

  • Docelder

    Doesn’t sound so bad. If we just put the corporations in Congress it will cut out the middle man. Maybe it would save us money in the end. At any rate, I don’t see the end results being any different. The corporations are going to get theirs either way. Real people are always going to be second class citizens to whatever agenda the corporatists have anyway. Maybe they can wear those suits like Nascar drivers wear… with big patches to show how much each corporation has paid to seat their guy in congress.

  • Boxer Mum 06

    Here’s a link to the blow out between Specter and Bachman. This will come up alot and haunt Specter!

    http://www.breitbart.tv/audio-specter-tells-bachmann-to-act-like-a-lady/

  • Solara 9

    Well, Brown won only because he wasn’t Coakley.

  • Katmoon

    Thanks Solara that is good to know. It is a dream I have to see just one politician put their voters ahead of their own ambitions.

  • no-nonsense- nancy

    I am from PA and I have respected Joe in the past but I attended a town hall meeting that he held in Aug. on the health care bill. He lied through the whole meeting. Everyone there was mad as all get out at him. He voted for Pelosi’s outrageous bill and I’m sure he will vote for it again. If it comes between him and Spector I would probably vote for Joe but then for the repub, maybe, in the fall. His only saving grace is that he was an ardent supporter of Hillary up until the end of the primary season.

  • My other site

    I like RFK,Jr. also.  He’s been out in the trenches and he truly understands the problems facing this country.  Whether he could get out from under the thumb of the current Democrats, I don’t know.  Hearing him speak live is an amazing experience.  He is truly bipartisan and he doesn’t know what a teleprompter is.

  • My other site

    Hilarious!  I love that idea!

  • Rich

    NNNancy–To me that he stood with Hillary very early on (before most others took a stand) and until the end is a BIG reason to support him. It speaks volumes.

  • Ani

    Well said.  Like his pretend focus on jobs all of a sudden, it is because it is politically expedient to do so.  Where is his heart?  When so many were suffering losing jobs and homes last year — instead he expended tons of political capital trying to ram this health care monstrosity that would have been a disaster for all.  All ego.  Many have said here, for more than two years, that his arrogance will be his undoing.  We are seeing it daily…

  • Ani

    Agreed, Linda.  He is a decent man who likewise is getting sucked into the herd mentality and must fight to keep his integrity at all costs.  He has to pull a “Scott Brown” and stick to his guns as much as possible to break through here.

  • cici

      top edhardy  tanks
    http://www.lookedhardy.com

  • Clara

    Yep, FlDemFem.  He keeps his hands clean at all costs, doesn’t he?  Just like he did with the health care bill and exactly why it’s been a disaster for the past year!  No guidance for Congress that could be pinned on him.  What a cowardly weasel he is. 

  • HC123

    I disagree.

    Coakley is taking the heat for a crappy administration that is out of step with what Americans want. She wasn’t notably bad nor did she run a particularly terrible campaign. In a different time her runoff election would have been a cakewalk, but unfortunately for her Obama is ballot box poison.

    I am not from PA and wont be voting in the primary, but from what I read above Sestak is just the same old BS.

  • Clara

    Agree Solara.  These are three men with spine, integrity and some independent thought.  I’d put Eric Massa in with that group, too.

  • HC123

    Love?

    Come on, hes a politician. No voter should love any politician. They are your employee, not your guru, and as a voter you should regard them as such.

    I am sorry this must be a very bad series of quotes from him because I read nothing extraordinary. Its just a string of the usual BS.

    Would I vote for him over Arlen? Yes. Does the stuff above inspire me? No way. I would have to read the BS of the designated (R) candidate to decide which way to go in a general election.

blog comments powered by Disqus