RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Blame Game, aka, The SOTU, and The Republican Response **UPDATED**

Bumped up with and Update at the bottom of the post.

Yes, Obama laid blame at the feet of just about everyone but himself last night during his SOTU. “The Buck Stops Here” moment was very short-lived, was it not? It’s Bush’s fault about the banks, even though Senator Obama voted to bail them out; it’s the Republicans fault – the minority party – that nothing can get passed in D.C., even though the Democrats had a super-majority, it is everyone’s fault but his, for whatever condition the country is in, unless it is something positive, then it is ALL him. Yes, he can walk and chew gum at the same time – woohoo!!! Let’s give him a standing ovation!! Lost jobs? Staggering deficit? Home foreclosures?? Nah, that’s not his fault.

And how about Justice Alito’s “Joe Wilson” moment, when he said, “Not true” to Obama’s claim the recent Supreme Court Decision would allow foreign dollars to influence our elections. All I gotta say is, lucky for him he isn’t from South Cackalacki, or else he would be labeled a racist. Ahem. I am sure this will be looked at from every which way in the upcoming days.

But in case you missed it, here is the moment with Justice Alito, with commentary from Peter Johnson:

Wow, that was some response from Mr. Johnson, who is, by the way, a Democrat, and who voted for Obama.

What else? Oh, yes, the whole DADT thing that Obama punted out to the Congress. That’s exactly what he did. DADT could have long ago been repealed, but yet, there it still is. I have zero patience for LGB groups who are going to be thankful for this little throwaway crumb from the table. If Obama wanted to end it, he would have. Now, just because he mentioned it, organizations like Servicemembers Legal Defense Network are all atwitter. Spare me. When Obama, and the Congress, actually DO something about it, then I’ll give them appropriate props. But until then, it’s the same-o, same-o, all talk and no action.

And how about the Republican Response? It was offered by new Virginia governor, Bob McDonnell from Richmond, in the House of Delegates. Take a look:

I have to say, this is one of the better responses I have seen from either side of the aisle (remember the incredibly painful, stiff response from then-Governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius?? Oh, wow – I had such high hopes for her until her incredibly wooden performance. Watching paint dry would have been more interesting.).

UPDATED: Jon Stewart had an interesting review of the media’s coverage of the SOTU. There was one person in particular who made a rather startling statement, and not for the first time. Check it out:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Speech Therapy – Post-Racial
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis

Why am I not surprised?? How about you?

  • Daisy Mae

    Wheww.  I feel like I’m in the right place.  Thanks, Amy.  After bobo finished his drivel, we were appalled at the SCOTUS scolding, the blame and the damn preachiness from O Arrogant Poseur.  Yet it provided a kool-aid sniff for the addicted, judging from the droolers on the left.  McDonnell was a little wooden, but a pleasant demeanor and said did a credible job.  I give him a break–it was his first big one.  And that was the bright side of this boring bobo encounter.

  • HARP

    But I thought Obama was so intelligent.

    One would hope the President of the United States would know the difference between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But in last night’s State of the Union Address, President Obama said:

    We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal….

    Um, wrong founding document, Mr. President. It is in our Declaration of Independence that we read:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    =-O =-O =-O =-O =-O

  • Mary cusack

    He basically said in the speeach that it doesn’t matter what the congress or supreem court did. He’ll just draw up exectuive orders to enact his will anyway.  we are screwwed.  this guy is a dictator!!  Hitler Anyone? WE ARE SO SCREWED

  • buzzlatte

    Every time he opens his mouth his IQ goes down.  

    Between Obama and his idiot speechwriter neither one of them could beat a fifth grader.

    Best part of the SOTU, Obama’s popularity went down today.  LOL!

  • Docelder

    Most if us never thought Obama could or would save jobs, homes or any of us, or anything we believe in as Americans. But it will be a shocker to his “flock” who are waiting patiently to be saved that… tada… he already did that. While nobody was watching no less. We don’t need  saved, because we are back from “the brink”. Right. He will get a short happy period from his faithful flock, followed by despair… is this all there is? Yes it is.

  • getfitnow

    I heard David Schuster make a comment about the well placed diverse group at the GOP’s response.

    No one said a word when one of BO’s staffers was setting up for an appearance and yelled–”We need more white people!”.

    Why does the left seem to, most often, filter everything through race and sex (gender)?

  • Sassy

    The remarks about the Supreme Court decision were compounded by the politicians jumping to their feet directly behind and around them. It looked like the reaction to scoring a touchdown. Juvenile, in my opinion.
    I enjoyed McDonnell’s response and liked the delivery from his legislative chamber. That lent dignity and interest to the occasion.

  • sowsear

    Yes, Buzzlatte, opening his mouth causes his IQ to go down, just like that old joke, if you break a cookie into pieces, the calories escape. 

  • oowawa

    Yes Sassy–it looked like the justices had been set up as props for ridicule.

  • sowsear

    Next time, they may decline the invitation.

  • Hank

    Why do people continue to say that he is very inteligent.  All they do make him think that he is.  The Moron in chief doesn’t even know we have 3 branches of Gov’t.   Yet he goes on the insult all of them except himself.  Inteligent, stop calling him that people in the MSM, he needed a teleprompter to speak to 6th graders.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Beats me, Hank.  Even with the speeches written for him, which I always found extremely short on substance, I cannot see why everyone claims he is SO intelligent.  He couldn’t come up with ANY policies of his own during the debates.  His constant refrain was, “I agree with Hillary.”  Somehow that morphed into HIS plans, not hers.  Yet another convenient trick of the MSM, no doubt…

  • Sonic Ninja Kitty

    I cannot believe the nerve of that Biden.  Although I am in agreement with him {gasp–that pains me more than I can express} regarding the court’s decision, he is talking out of both sides of his a**, excuse my French!!  HE and his presy-buddy have been SO tied up with corporations and specials interests this past year and NOW he’s playing ‘savior of the people’!  ACK!!  I cannot take the hypocrisy!!

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    You aren’t only kidding.  Glenn Greenwald over at Salon clims that ALITO was the one who breached decorum.  I guess it’s okay with him for the POTUS to make completely false statements deriding the SCOTUS, without any opportunity to defend themselves, something Obama is mighty good at doing. 

    He’s like the schoolyard bully, really.  And if he doesn’t get his way, he ends up throwing a tantrum, either making derogatory comments, limiting access, whatever it takes.  So, so petty…

  • Peggy Sue

    I was surprised by the generally flat tone of the speech and the lack of specifics, particularly about jobs.  He “talked” about jobs but he didn’t say: okay, “this” is what we’re going to do, “this” is how many jobs we can expect, “these” are the areas we’re going to concentrate in and we’ll be monitoring are efforts until we reach our goal [whatever the goal is].

    Instead what I heard were these sweeping notions about jobs and 1000 green jobs here and another 1100 green jobs over there.  It’s all very good to offer tax credits to families with college-age children.  But if you don’t have a job, you’re lucky to get food on the table.  College becomes a luxury.

    So, I expected more.  Yes, the DADT was almost a given.  No promises beyond “I’ll work with Congress.”  However, I did hear this afternoon that there’s a scheduled meeting between Obama, Gates and the Chiefs of Staff [because the Generals supposedly have to be brought on board].  So, maybe some cages will be rattled and something will get done.

    And yes, the Bush blame is getting wearisome though Bush & Cheney share responsibility for this economic mess.  But now it’s on Obama’s plate and no one is interested in the blame game.  It’s his mess and he needs to clean it up.  Stop the fingerpointing.

    Overall, a disappointment with the exception of the dustup with the Supremes.  I know it’s not a popular position, but I pleasantly surprised with Obama’s comments as well as surprised by Alito’s reaction [the judges are normally so stone-faced].  And, of course, you’re right, Amy–the opinions are all over the place, depending on what source you tap.

    And the Republican response?  Same old, same old for me.  Frankly, none of these politicians impress me anymore.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Seriously, buzz?  I meant to go check on that, but an emergency root canal later, I kinda forgot.  Anyway, there’s some just desserts!

  • buzzlatte

    Down two points on Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll from yesterday.  Also, RCP average was down this morning.  So, perhaps the bounce will materialize later or not at all, which is more preferable. :)

  • Hank

    The POTUS even needs his teleprompter to speak to 6th graders.  Unbelievable!!!!

  • Katmoon

    What distrubs me the most is all of these politcians think so little of us; they truly believe we will swallow this, hook line and sinker. Regardless of party, or posture, they presume way too much. I would fire Pelosi just for a poor imitation of a Jack-in-the-box. Seems they believe they hired themselves. We must continue to remind them, we are their employer.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Thanks for the comment, Peggy Sue.  One of the problems with Obama’s slam at the Supremes is that he was wrong in his judgment abt the decision.  Even the man who brought the suit was shocked that someone who considers himself to be a Constitutional Scholar was so off-base.

    Then again, this is the same man who confused the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as HARP pointed out above.

    Sure, Bush and Cheney deserve some blame for some of the economic issues we are facing, but Obama voted FOR the same policies he is now blasting.

    I hear you, though.  The hypocrisy with so many of these people is just disturbing, but especially when someone has a platform like Obama does…

  • Katmoon

    Disturb even… :-[

  • Mark

    Obama never takes blame, he just hovers over the rest of us like we are his peons.  This is nothing new, it is the way he has always been.

    I still can’t get over his arrogance after he got caught in Wright’s racist, anit-American church for 20 years.  But instead of apologizing he gives a pathetic speech where he blames everyone else but himself, even throwing grandma overboard and insinuating that she was a racist.  Meanwhile, Obama feels he is beyond reproach but it is the rest of us who have problems.

  • Yttik

    Obama’s speech was so full of contradictions, he simply left people even more confused then ever. Well some us aren’t confused, we know he really has no fricken idea WTH he’s doing so it’s just making it up as he goes along.

  • timmy

    I’m yet to find anything any action any deed any speech any words uttered by Obama before and after he became president that’s inspiring.


    If you know any action or deed and heard of any words please let me know.  Obama is useless. All the liberals who voted for him and are still standing by him should have their heads examin.

  • Katmoon

    I know Timmy, its like he didn’t exist until he ran for office.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    So, true – he really does think he is beyond reproach – such arrogance…

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Um, uh, ah…

    You know what he could say that WOULD be inspiring to me?  “I quit.”  :-D

  • Always Learning

    A little off topic, but I just saw the headline that Obama has ordered the Justice Department to find a new location for the KSM terror trial. Obama now wants it moved out of NYC. This guy blows with the wind.

  • Peggy Sue

    Btw, Amy, I just an interesting essay over at Cannonfire, link here:

    http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/

    on the comments the President made regarding exports.  This, too, is suppose to increase jobs.  But as Cannon asks: what exports???

    Interesting read.

  • Diana L. C.

    Thanks, RRRA!  I do appreciate your work for us.  I do not have the paience to watch the t.v. when it’s happening.  I am always afraid I will throw a shoe at Obama’s face (so I know how that Iraqi felt about Bush–well, actually I felt the same way about Bush.).  My sig other would not appreciate that, as his Christmas present to himself was his new 52″ with the surround sound mounted speakers in the room.

    It’s just much easier on my nervous sytem to come here later and read all the posts by NQ’s great writers and all the great regulars.  My dream is one day not to have to count on you. 

    By the way, my sig other DID try to watch the SOTU, but it lasted only a few minutes because he couldn’t stand to watch NP jumping up and acting strange.  When I told him that a commenter her had called her Nancy-in-a-Box, he just about fell over laughing.  He said it was the perfect description for what he saw.

    (Whoever came up with that, thanks!)

  • Katmoon

    Diane, we worry over throwing shoes and breaking up the house as well; so we take all the rolled socks out the dressers and fire away; as well as a frequent moon, as called for. It really makes you feel better. In the summer we use water mists into the air, an old game we used for the kids to keep the monsters away. It works on keeping the shoes off of the television. I totally get the shoe throwing thing.

  • Diana L. C.

    Thanks, Katmoon!  I’ll have to remember this! 

    And RRRA, I forgot to mention that from now on, I will always picture you up there on that cross as you watch this drivel for us.

  • Geoff Kucera

    Regarding DADT, Obama is clearly more concerned to extending protections under our constitution to un-uniformed foreign combatants captured in a field of battle to whom our constitution does not apply and never has applied then to enforcing the rights under that same constitution for the American men and women in uniform who have sworn with their very lives to protect and defend it.

  • sowsear

    No city can afford to have the trial in its jurisdiction. Better find a military court somewhere.

  • buzzlatte

    Happens to be my favorite inspiration, too.

    Sorry about the dental emergency.  Hope it turned out ok.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Yep, couldn’t happen to a more deserving fellow…

  • nickoury

    I have always said odumba’s a windsock.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Amen, Geoff – well said!!

  • Ferd Berfle

    I’ll keep it short because I’m miffed. All I am able to surmise from the pedestrian performance by the Bot in Chief is that there are a lot of functionally illiterate and prose-challenged people populating this country if they think That One has command of anything other than the crap ricocheting around his empty head. Every time That One opens his gaping maw to put together a string of words, whose only connection to each other is that they came from his mouth and are temporally linked, I’m reminded of just how well our ancestors spoke and wrote. Of course, they were making an honest effort to relay real and factual information to other real people and not tring to spin bullshit into an odiriferous souffle for a group of bobbing heads.

    The country is being run by a group of addle-headed morons who can tallk a lot without saying a fucking thing.

  • Onofre’s arm

    Nazi Pelosi a “Jack in the Box”? How about “Jerk in Botox”? 

    Seriously though, I think the Secret Service should consider the danger the POTUS is in when he stands so closely in front of NP. If the highly tensioned restraints that are holding her facial skin back ever fail in one of her countless mini moonshots out of her seat, he could be seriously injured by the resulting backlash of leathery skin snapping back into place with the slashing force of a bull whip. Something to think about.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Can any one tell me what “The Lost Decade” is about? Sorry, I am stuck on it.

    I am starting to think BO was talking about himself.

  • nobody

    That Peter Johnson is a fool. Alito was protesting the mischaracterization of the ruling. Obama and Biden (fuck them) said a century old law was struck down. No, they took out the ban from the McCain-Feingold bill.

    Read: From Justice Alito’s Reaction
    By LINDA GREENHOUSE

    This time, Justice Alito shook his head as if to rebut the president’s characterization of the Citizens United decision, and seemed to mouth the words “not true.” Indeed, Mr. Obama’s description of the holding of the case was imprecise. He said the court had “reversed a century of law.”

    The law that Congress enacted in the populist days of the early 20th century prohibited direct corporate contributions to political campaigns. That law was not at issue in the Citizens United case, and is still on the books. Rather, the court struck down a more complicated statute that barred corporations and unions from spending money directly from their treasuries — as opposed to their political action committees — on television advertising to urge a vote for or against a federal candidate in the period immediately before the election.

  • Ferd Berfle

    I’m also rather surprised That One didn’t use some hackneyed adage (he’s quite fond of using them even though he hasn’t a clue as to historical context) such as, “you know, we’re a team here in Washington and there’s no “I” in team”. I would have loved it because the simple retort would be, “There’s no ‘you’, either, you blithering twerp.”

  • HARP

    White House orders Justice Department to look for other places to hold 9/11 terror trial
    Might I suggest a little island in SF bay. That way Nancy can keep an eye on them.

  • Ferd Berfle

    I see the spamminator is back, meaning it is OK for the anointed to use choice words but not commenters. you know, censorship does not become this website but I am at a point where I no longer care.

  • HARP

    He must be refering to Japan during the 90`s.

    Overall, this has led to the phenomenon known as the “lost decade”; economic expansion came to a total halt in Japan during the 1990s.

    http://www.japan-101.com/history/history_lost_decade.htm

  • buzzlatte

    Friday night news cycle..hmmmm.  Next, they’ll find a military court venue on another Friday night.   Nice way to try and hide the little political/legal hell O-vomit and Holder created for themselves.

  • AC

    NEVER HAVE LIKED “ORDIFEROUS SOUFLE[S]“

  • AC

    NEVER HAVE LIKED “O[]DIFEROUS SOUFLE[S]”  THEY COULDN’T PASS THE SMELL TEST

  • Docelder

    Yes, but he used it to mean from 2000 to 2009 today in Tampa. I heard a part of his speech on TV, before I had better things to do. But, he said that time period was the lost decade because companies got richer and middle class lost earning power. It is the classism anti-Bush diatribe that he used to get elected with. It’s all he has.

    An side note… here in Tampa the news was interviewing scads of people whi had tickets, but couildn’t get in because they were told it was already “full”. These people waited 6-8hours the day before for the tickets and when they came they were turned away. I am thinking the crowd was mostly planted and the people let in were mostly selected. I don’t know how else 2000 people had tickets in their hands, but a lot of them were turned away.

  • candymarl

    So let me understand. This all of the Republicans fault inspite of the large majority, in both houses, that Democrats have. This is a far larger majority than GWB had. Then why do the Democrats  need a majority if there’s nothing they can do? That’s the same thing they said when in the minority.

    I still disagree with the SCOTUS decision. So the money will come diretly from these organizations rather than their PACs? Will they will held to the same standard to reveal all donors and amounts? Will SCOTUS uphold said law supposedly still on the books?

    The way it looks to me is that we are getting hit from both sides here.

    We The People no longer count. This is a new day.

  • sowsear

    How about Washington, DC. No other city can afford the cost of security. In Washington, they’re right close to The Great Printing Machine.

  • AC

    Odiferous souffles

  • TeakWoodKite

    I watched the first time strictly for the comedy value. I watched a second time for content…(then I remembered I am a kite…and I know thing or two about the wind.)

    Yup, I’d say the content was more an updraft than a cool breeze.
     BO smacked the senate repeatedly and he thinks he can beat them into submission? IGIT! He thinks he can dis SCOTUS and not have a challenge over his NB status end up there? Is he that arrogant to think he, “The One”, is immune to retribution? What. a. Clown.
    The other thing perceived was BO’s attempt to suck up to the center and co-opt the “independent” / tea party demographic. That failed because, while he can crap all over 1600,  I do not believe that attacking the courts’ decision was anything but childish stupidity and the hight of hypocrisy on his part.
    BO TURNED of the security measures for “on-line donations” and it was documented that he took money from over seas. Gaza included. Soldier for Hillary had posted this info during the primaries. It amounts to millions of dollars.
    At one point during the second viewing, I thought it was an SNL skit about BO speaking from  the Pulpit of the TUCC…

  • Docelder

    Everything about Obama’s stagecraft is planned. In Tampa today they placed some of the most Pelosi like people i.e. mindless glowing and over the head clapping as possible. It looked like “The Price is Right ” behind him for the part I saw.

  • TeakWoodKite
  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    LOL, too funny, Diana!  You know I couldn’t resist saying it, though!  :-D

    And Katmoon, that is a FANTASTIC idea!!!  Dang, I wish I had thought of that during the debates with Obama and Clinton.  Or should I say Clinton and “Ditto”??

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    nobody, Peter Johnson said that Alito was reacting to Obama’s micharacterization (or downrigt lie, as others have said) of the law, and that his reaction was natural.  IOW, he seemed to be agreeing with you.

    Now, BIDEON, OTOH…

  • AC

    Ferd,
    It wouldn’t let me comment for a while.I thinks it’s the software, it’s not acting right.  However I also don’t like the odiferous souffles that Obama bakes.

  • Geoff Kucera

    I agree with you on the D majority and trying to blame the R’s, aint gonna work.  THe D’s had enough votes to bass a bill (forget about its blatant unconstitutionality) to ban the Republican Party and all other parties if they all voted together as D’s.

    You understanding of the S.Ct. ruling in the Citizens case is entirely wrong.  It’s not your fault, your misunderstanding is the most widely promoted misconception there is, Obama even re-iterated this misconception himself when attacking the Supremes.  Tell a lie often enough and people will believe it.

    The misconception is that this decision struck down limits on direct corporate contributions to the campaign funds of individual candidates, the 100 year old precedent that Obama mentioned.  IT DID NOT!!!  Those limits are still law.

    What the Supremes held unconstitutional was the provision of the much more recent McCain-Feingolf campaign finance reform act that barred a corporation, other than media companies, from spending money outside of direct campaign contributions in support or opposition to any candidate.  Specifically, it said that free speech is chilled when the necessary means to distribute such speech, i.e., purchasing media air time, are made unlawful.

    The Supremes ruled correctly.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    ferd, I can check and see if there is anything in there, but I swear, this new system still has some bugs in it.   You know we LOVE having you and Katmoon here – please don’t take it personally!  I’ll see if anything is in there, but this one has been more open minded than the last one (!), and has even let in real spam (need any hair care products?  How abt NFL t-shirts?).  Let me see if I can find anything.

    But please don’t go!  :)

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Nope, nothing but ads in there.  I had a comment hang up and not post, so maybe that was it.  Seriously, there are still some bugs with this new system.  They are working to fix it, but sometimes, it happens.  Sorry!!

  • Docelder

    I flag the spammers when I see them, does it help you guys find them? I think of them like graffiti vandals. If you let their work stand, it will just bring more.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Mary Landrieu was asked abt the speech, and she basically said what you said – Obama slammed the Senate, and she didn’t think that was at all fair.

    And why CAN’T the Dems get anything done?  He slams the Reps for not showing LEADERSHIP, yet where is HIS??  Sheesh.

    CANDYMARL – I hear you abt the SCOTUS decision. You may know I am concerned abt it too from a post I did the other day.  But, the thing to which Alito was reacting was Obama’s interpretation, which, from most accounts, was wrong.  I still think it’s a bad decision, too, but not for the reason Obama picked.

  • felizarte

    Every incoming president throughout history has had to deal with the policies of the previous president who made decisions based on the circumstances they faced in their terms of office.  In the case of Obama, he has been on this blame thing for too long.  He should no longer be allowed to use this as an excuse.  Whatever happens in his presidency, or whatever situation he faces, they are his to deal with for the people of the country.  And he should never forget that he is president of all the people, not just his friends and supporters.

  • Docelder

    Maybe Obama just doesn’t understand that law. Just because he went to Harvard doesn’t mean anything. No one has seen his records going in or coming out of there.

  • WestVirginia304

    The GOP response was brilliant in its staging.  There will never be an opposition response to a union address given from a lonely room, ever again.  Matching the decorum and pomp during the VA gov’s response was a trend setting event.  Why did nobody think about doing that before.

    Maybe John Steward is right.  Today’s repubs are playing chess.  Now.. if they ask to one of their pawns crowned a queen then we may doubt that they have been planning their good fortunes.  But, for now, it seems they are acting rather smart.

  • felizarte

    Obama will probably regret this episode with the SCOTUS justices if the question regarding his citizenship ever reaches the high court.

  • Peggy Sue

    Ferd, you seem to have taken my place as spammy’s favorite target.  I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the new system since I spent half my time in the past begging to be fished out of the dumpster.

    Another mystery of cyberworld!  I know it’s aggravating!

  • Onofre’s arm

    Teak, your post gave me a disturbing thought. What if Obonobo deliberately insulted the SCOTUS in order to preempt any scrutiny by them into his NBC status? If, or when, the issue of his eligibility reaches the SCOTUS, Obonobo will simply claim that it is just retribution for his pathetic treatment of them in the STFU address.

  • Docelder

    I think he is trying to buy populist support by running his bus over the senate, the house, the supreme court and lobbyists. He is making excuses by bashing republicans and Bush. But, this is a mistake I think. When you hear Brown speak, he doesn’t bash democrats or the institutions of government. He speaks of ideals that give him popular support. I really think now, that Obama can’t compete in this realm because at heart he really can’t find empathy with middle class America. I don’t think his twenty something speech writer can either because he hasn’t lived it and is too young to draw from personal experience. He probably couldn’t write a country song either. But, I think most of us here could though. 8-)  

  • nobody

    Nope, Johnson does not allude to the mischaracterization of Obama saying century old law has been reversed — that is an outright lie of Obama’s and needs to be highlighted while discussing this topic.

    George Will has a sensible article on this topic. Look at what happened in the Dem primary. Obama spent 4-5 times more than Hillary but still had to be dragged over the finish line by skulduggery. The citizenry will take into account the money aspect of a campaign. Obama is the last person to be outraged about this after refusing public financing. In making Alito the bad guy, everybody is letting Obama off the hook.

  • WestVirginia304

    Good.  Not what I would have thought.  I think that the justice was right.

    The president’s statement is not true about foreign corporations being able to contribute money now towards our elections.
    The Court held that 2 U.S.C. Section 441a, which prohibits all corporate political spending, is unconstitutional. Foreign nationals, specifically defined to include foreign corporations, are prohibited from making “a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State or local election” under 2 U.S.C. Section 441e, which was not at issue in the case. Foreign corporations are also prohibited, under 2 U.S.C. 441e, from making any contribution or donation to any committee of any political party, and they prohibited from making any “expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication.”

  • Docelder

    But, he is going to turn antagonistic when things don’t go his way. We should know it will be coming. He will try to bend and twist and force his will on us once he knows we won’t let him willingly.

  • WestVirginia304

    The decision did not allow China to get in US politics.  Obama’s statement WAS a lie.

  • Peggy Sue

    I share your concern over the SCOTUS ruling, Candymarl. And though you’re absolutely right about the Dems complicity in the economic woes we’re suffering now, I don’t think we should forget the huge expenditures in Iraq, a totally unnnecessary effort in blood and treasure with no honesty about the costs incurred. 

    That is part of the Big Lie I refuse to forgive. 

    However, lots of blame to go around.  And yes, the Dems share that and need to stop the blame game and come up with actual solutions.

    Right now, I don’t hear any.

  • Docelder

    He lies? Somebody tell Nancy.

  • timmy

    Has Obama become bored with being president?

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Has-Obama-become-bored-with-being-president_-82978332.html


    What a waste….. liberal got themselves into with this fraud…

  • jbjd

    Howard Zinn died yesterday; he was 87.  He was my first college professor.  It was a lecture class in political science; we numbered well over 100 students.  That was during the labor tumult at BU, the first private university to organize its clerical staff.  (The faculty had also organized.)  Anyway, one day on campus, I saw Professor Zinn speaking with his dear colleague, Professor Murray Levin.  He was already a legend by this time; I had no pedigree.  But my presence on the path had been detected; going around would have been even more conspicuous.  Now, I would have to say something.  So, I practiced a polite “hello,” determined I could at least get that out, and keep on walking.  All went according to plan until Professor Zinn exclaimed, “Wait!,” reaching out his arm to draw me into their conversation.  He turned to Professor Levin.  “Murray, I want you to meet my star pupil.”  I will never forget those words, or how special I felt when he said that, for as long as I live.

    Not surprisingly, Professor Zinn predicted, at best, BO would only be a “mediocre president — which means, in our time, a dangerous president — unless there is some national movement to push him in a better direction.”
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/01/27/howard.zinn/index.html

  • whoframedrudy

    I didn’t listen to the SOME (State of My Ego) address.  Did he give McCain props for the McCain-Feingold Act?  Since he’s playing partisan politics with SCOTUS.

    Regardless of the merits of the ruling, I don’t like Prez playing politics with SCOTUS.  It was SCOTUS that stood down Nixon when he suffered a nervous breakdown and tried to become dictator.

    Obama is pathetic.  He has the White House, the House and Senate, the media in his pocket, and he wants even more power?  He’s done nothing  with the power he already has!

    SCOTUS is our last line of defense against a power-mad megalomaniac in the Oval Office.

  • buzzlatte

    Torches and pitchforks should be our last line of defense.

    ‘State of my Ego’  LOL!

  • buzzlatte

    We are going to miss Dr. Zinn’s generation and their wonderful work ethic and civility.  One of my undergrad professors died last year.  It hit hard.  He was wonderful, too.

    I keep hoping that Obama will get bored and resign.  If not that, then get him up on charges for something to assure he will not run again.

    Shades of Nixon, I guess.

  • Peggy Sue

    How fortunate for you, jbjd, to have known and studied with Howard Zinn.  I’ve always tried to catch his appearances on cable discussions and book TV.  I heard about his death earlier today.  His voice will be missed.  And yes, he was less than flattering about Barack Obama’s presidency.  He had a good eye, obviously!

  • Patience

    Call me a philistine but I think political speeches are overrated these days — the perpetually-pontificating POTUS has caused a devaluation of rhetoric.

    I don’t expect or even want much detail in a SOTU address.  I’ve seen so many, and I think what matters most is the proper tone, not necessarily laundry lists of specifics.  Nothing in any of the rebuttals have ever made it into Bartlett’s, as far as I know, and this year’s was no exception.

    As for last night’s SOTU, the cocktail party conviviality made me absolutely sick.  These are very hard times for millions of Americans and the Smiley Face atmosphere in the hall for nearly all of the 70 minutes of the speech was not only inappropriate but offensive.  Who really paid attention to what the POTUS said when everyone’s face was plastered with a blinding smile and every line got a standing ovation?  Maybe that was actually part of the strategy. 

    It was evident last night what was truly important to the POTUS and the Democratic Party — their image — and not the state of the union.

  • candymarl

    You’re right RRRA. But Obama is a Constitutional scholar. How could he be wrong? Oh, wait.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    :-D

  • VidSweet

    Hey, the buzz is that RECONCILIATION IS CLOSE!! Spread this SPOOF of ObamaCare and show everyone what a mistake ObamaCare is! Post on the lib blogs, too!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwGqtHX6Pxs

  • Babs

    BO is a user extraordinaire, and, in their quest for more power and glory, Pelosi, Reid and the Democrats in Congress played right into his hands. Do you think it was just laziness that compelled him to refuse to outline exactly what he wanted in the health care “reform” bill? It was a carefully, calculated omission that allowed him to stay above the fray and maintain that personal popularity that so drives him. He is still voting “present” to avoid the fall-out that always comes with making the tough decisions and sticking to your guns, but in doing so he is also reinforcing my personal belief from day one – he has never been, and never will be, the strong leader this country needs today more than ever.

  • VidSweet

    Hey, the buzz is that RECONCILIATION IS CLOSE!! Spread this SPOOF of ObamaCare and show everyone what a mistake ObamaCare is! Post on the lib blogs, too!!! 
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwGqtHX6Pxs

  • VidSweet

    obama’s Judgment is terrible!! MOCK his healthcare bill to turn public opinion against it. SHARE this EPIC SPOOF of what obamacare cannot do! POST everywhere online–boards, forums, blogs, social sites!

    Hey, the buzz is that RECONCILIATION IS CLOSE!! 

  • beachnan

    RRA, wouldn’t it be wonderful if the Supremes turned the tables on Obama, and held a press conference, to specifically state what their interpretation of the bill is.  They should explain it in the most fundamental terms, so that the country and the former law professor understood their determination.  That man needs somebody of stature to rebutt his comments.

  • Onofre’s arm

    What? No “Likes” or “LOL’s”. Perhaps my description of Pelosi’s radical plastic surgery reversal was to graphic. I understand. Or maybe the thought of Obama receiving collateral injuries from the event is a pleasant vision. But I’m warning you, the mass psychological trauma caused by the nationally televised instantaneous and horrific transformation of the Speaker of the House’s face from something resembling a bug eyed bongo drum, into the face of a Shar Pei sitting backwards in a centrifuge, could send this country into catatonic shock. I’ll be wearing a blindfold for the next STFU address. 

  • jbjd

    PS, thank you, yes, I value that experience and relationship.  I reacquainted with him about a year ago; I will write about that occasion at another time.

  • tango

    Well what do you expect when you have a bunch of 25 year olds writing his speeches and Obama too lazy to actually read them beforehand & check for errors since he knows the teleprompter, his bestest friend, will be there to feed him the words.

  • tango

    Well the Supreme Court Justices don’t attend ever SOTU speech. I think they’ve missed ones given by Clinton, Bush, etc. I expect they’ll not rush to attend his next one.  I wonder if Obama criticizing their decision was because he knew they’d be there and that’s his way of getting a jab in to them?

  • TeakWoodKite

    The same way he slammed the banks and Bernanke gets 70 votes in the Senate. That HIS guy…

  • TeakWoodKite

    The same way he slammed the banks and Bernanke gets 70 votes in the Senate. That was HIS guy…

  • TeakWoodKite

    @Onofre’s Arm, how could it end any way but badly for him?

    BO: Just kiddin Alito really I was…

    Alito calls his bud over at appeals court and says give them standing. And every judge between them kicks up to the court. One more time.

    Recall that BO meet with the court during the primaries.

  • TeakWoodKite

    I’d like to hear about it.

  • trixta

    so true, nobody

  • Onofre’s arm

    Did you ever see “Basic Instinct”? Because Obama has now established animosity toward the court, Obama AND the media, AND his worshippers, would all howl to the sky if the SCOTUS were to come after him in any form. Any legitimate scrutiny by the court into Obama’s eligibility would cause everyone to say that the conservatives on the court were just retaliating for the STFU insult. Of course, there is probably nothing to this, I just needed to post SOMETHING to see if my avatar is working.

  • trixta

    basically, docelder, BO has no idea how to be a leader

  • Onofre’s arm

    How about that, it works! I’m complete.

  • Hokma

    Obama’s stump speech the other night was not just the longest SOTU but the most unfocused, amatuerish, and childish.

    It was  complete suspension of reality on his part who is in a complete state of denial of the now clear rejection by Americans of his policies and his leadership (or lack of). Yet, like a 10 year old, he continues to try to point fingers elsewhere.

    One thing he said that shows how out of touch he is was when he said that “Americans just want to know what’s in it for them” when it came to healthcare.

    No, that’s not it, Obama. America wants to know that you are not harming the healthcare they already have, that it will not cost any more, and will not tkae them away from their doctors. They of course would like to see healthcare costs go down but Obamacare was shwon to do the opposite.

    The issue with the Supreme Court showed that Obama was nothing more than an adjunct lecturer who lectured from the department syllabus when it came to Constitutional law because his speech proved he is ignorant of it.

  • glennmcgahee

    If the President and Congress really care about the decision of the SC. They can get to work immediately on fixing the law. Me thinks they dost protest too much. In actuality, they are salivating over those extra dollars being spent on their behalf. Corporate money helps those in power, not the challengers.

  • Katmoon

    I’m not going anywhere. Sometimes software just has to work out the problems.

  • oowawa

    Yes, I’ve always heard “Lost Decade” pertaining to Japan in the 90′s.  However, Wikipedia has the following categories under the term:

    The lost decade may refer to:
    La Década Perdida (Spanish for lost decade), the economic crisis in Latin American in general, and Mexico in specific, during the 1980′sLost Decade, the economic crisis following the Japanese asset price bubble during the 1990′sThe Lost Decade, a BBC Four television series about the years 1945 to 1955 in the United Kingdom, broadcast from October 2005 to January 2006[1]China’s Lost Decade: The Politics and Poetics of the 1980′s, a book by Gregory B. Lee about [2]The 2000s – due in part to the Great Recession

  • jbjd

    David Gergen, who arguably cost Martha Coakley votes (he asked Scott Brown a question, calling it Kennedy’s Senate seat; and Brown retorted, ‘It’s the PEOPLE’s seat!’), was on the Colbert Report.  Safely burrowed into BO’s hip pocket, Mr. Gergen alternatively compared BO to JFK; and suggested he was perhaps better suited to sit on the SCOTUS.
    http://www.hulu.com/watch/124470/the-colbert-report-thu-jan-28-2010

  • oowawa

    Yes, I’ve always heard “Lost Decade” pertaining to Japan in the 90′s.  However, Wikipedia has the following categories under the term:  
     
    The lost decade may refer to:  
    La Década Perdida (Spanish for lost decade), the economic crisis in Latin American in general, and Mexico in specific, during the 1980′s

    Lost Decade, the economic crisis following the Japanese asset price bubble during the 1990′s

    The Lost Decade, a BBC Four television series about the years 1945 to 1955 in the United Kingdom, broadcast from October 2005 to January 2006[1]

    China’s Lost Decade: The Politics and Poetics of the 1980′s, a book by Gregory B. Lee about [2]

    The 2000s – due in part to the Great Recession

  • oowawa

    What happens when you click the “flag” button?

  • oowawa

    Yes, Peggy Sue–It’s mysterious.  I haven’t lost a single post to the Almighty Spam Filter under the new system, and I occasionally do use words I would not use in church.

  • oowawa

    Yes Ferd–please stick around.  There are times when Yosemite Sam needs to step into the saloon, both guns blazing, and clear out the varmints.

  • Chelsea Patriot

     I am wondering whether there may not be regrets with some Justices at having refused  to hear Dr. Orly’s case.

  • oowawa

    Basic Instinct?  All I remember about that movie is Sharon Stone.  I may have to go back and review it a few times to see what you’re talking about. 

    Well, Onofre’s arm, your avatar mystifies me, which is good.  A scene from the Milagro Beanfield War?  I’ll have to watch that again also.

  • Peggy Sue

    I wonder if it has something to do with frequency of posts.  I’ll be off line next week, so it’ll be interesting to see if I have the “gobble” problem when I return.  Not that I’m asking for it, mind you.  The last thing I want to do is tick off spammy. :-D  

  • Obama: Dubya 2 Electric Boogaloo

    I cant believe I used to like the guy.

  • creeper

    Let’s not get too excited about that Rasmussen rating.  It came out twelve hours after the SOTU speech.  There’s no way it can reflect voters’ feelings on that speech.  Those numbers will be coming out today and tomorrow.

  • Yttik

    Obama took several of Palin’s ideas and put them in his speech. He also tried to use some of her buzz words, “common sense” and “business as usual.” But is wasn’t connected to what he was saying or who he is. For example he talked about earmarks and striking them out line by line. The problem is the president doesn’t have line item veto power. All thru his speech I noticed Palin’s words and ideas, but they were simply floated out there and disconnected from the job he has and the position he is in.

  • oowawa

    Thee One, Prince of Peace, POTUS,  as Supreme Court Justice?  Well why not–it would be the perfect thing to round out his resume:

    Scholar
    Professor
    Senator
    President of the United States
    Nobel Peace Prize Winner
    Justice of the Supreme Court

    oh–I forgot
    Messiah
    World Savior

  • Sassy

    An excerpt from an editorial:

    Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said the effort to divide political spending by corporations and unions into legal and illegal forms impermissably chills political speech.
    “When government seeks to use its’ full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control thought,” he wrote.

    I support the decision, but that is irrelevant.
    The Constitution is not worth the parchment it is written on, if decisions of importance are made purely on the premise of which political party has the majority on the court.

  • Obama: Dubya 2 Electric Boogaloo

    Did you see the new CNN poll. First non Rasmussen poll on RCP to go negative for Sparky. The drill down on people’s attitudes on The Messiah are starting to bottom out. And this was BEFORE the SOTU.

    http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/01/26/rel2b.pdf

  • Peggy Sue

    I do not understand why everyone needs to compare Barack Obama to someone else–JFK, FDR, Lincoln, etc., etc.

    Just once, I’d like to hear the press say: Will the real Barack Obama please stand up.

    And after the dustup the other night?  SCOTUS is not in Obama’s future.  Might have worked for Taft but I think Obama killed any reasonable chance.  8-)

  • oowawa

    Why do we need to compare Barack Obama to someone else?  In order to further glorify His Greatness, because we know that he dwarfs the Greatest of them all: Paul Bunyan, Pecos Bill, John Henry: all midgets, all weenies, when considered standing beside Thee One & Only Barack Hussein Obama!  All Hail!!!

  • AC

    Ferd,
    Your comment was there, I read it and moreover, I should have  placed quotes around “odiferous souffle” in my response.

    It was here and then disappeared.

  • Ladydawnelle

    I love Sarah, but even I am getting tired of the NOW overused “common sense conservative values” mantra!!! ARGH!!  that and the pro life mantra over and over…………  if I hear either of these much more I will stop listening to even the great Lady Sarah.  I don’t much like being preached to about private subjects.

  • Required Reading

    I don’t think that there IS a “real Obama.”  Didn’t he himself write that his whole M.O. is to say to everyone what they want to hear, so that people on opposing sides of an issue are all convinced that he sides with them? Now he is at the crossroads of his various handlers, so he just speaks their words while adopting his holier-than-thou, I-have-to-teach-the-masses demeanor.  The constant need to compare him with greater predecessors comes from the fact that there is nothing more to him than that well-practiced demeanor.  There’s nothing of substance inside to make him his own man.

  • oowawa

    Wow–Gergen comes off as being as kool-aid saturated as The Tingler or Herr Olbermann . . .

  • oowawa

    Wow–Gergen comes off as being as kool-aid saturated as The Tingler or Herr Olbermann . . .

  • Ladydawnelle

    better men (than obambi) have tried and failed

    we (the People) are letting them ALL know in DC that we won’t let this NEW toy of theirs take over either
    and GOOD for Alito (he has some balz afterall)  and wtf was wrong with the REST of the Stepford Judges?  JEzzzz did you SEE their MUGS?  Scary blank.

  • AC

    whoframedrudy,

    Your heart’s in the right place but I think we should give more credit to the courageous D.C. District Court Judge John Sirica who decided against Nixon. It was his ruling that was unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court.denies.

  • oowawa

    Agreed.  She has to resist the temptation to use “common sense” and “conservative values” as an invisibility cloak.  Let’s get specific!

  • AC

    whoframedrudy,

    Your heart’s in the right place but I think we should give more credit to the courageous D.C. District Court Judge John Sirica who decided against Nixon. It was his ruling that was unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court.

  • AC

    whoframedrudy,

    Your heart’s in the right place but I think we should give more credit to the courageous D.C. District Court Judge John Sirica who decided against Nixon. It was his ruling that was unanimously upheld by the Supreme Court.

  • AC

    Sassy,
    I couldn’t agree more!  Hear, hear.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Docelder, I know – you’re right, of course.  Obama is one of the most petty people I have ever seen, so yeah – I am sure there will be blowback…

  • FLDemFem

    He won’t be able to do that with anything that takes actual money to implement, unless Congress agrees to it. In the Constitution, which Obama really needs to read, it says that only Congress can appropriate money for funding and the funds cannot be used for any other purpose than that for which it is appropriated. To do so is an impeachable offense, which I pointed out all over the net when Bush used money appropriated for Afghanistan to prep for the invasion of Iraq before he got the go-ahead from Congress. So the first time one of Obama’s Executive Orders uses money appropriated for another purpose, he can be impeached. And be convicted. And be gone. Ahhhhhhhhhhh..

  • oowawa

    “Scary blank”–Or, a poker face.  There is strength in not revealing the power of your hand.  We saw the same blank look on the faces of the generals.  Let Thee One perform his song and dance and bamboozle the audience with his facial expressions.  Let everyone ooh and ahh at his magnificent “eloquence.”  I remember the look on Wes Clark’s face when he used to give war updates and answer questions: he could stare a hole through a brick wall; he was nobody’s performing monkey.

  • AC

    Sassy,
    I couldn’t agree more (with your last sentence, that is).
    Hear, hear!

  • Peggy Sue

    Guess it goes back to that “blank slate” idea, RR.  We get to scribble whatever we’re a-wishing for.

    But that’s gotten real old, real fast. 

  • FLDemFem

    If Obama did end up on the SCOTUS, would he be allowed to bring his speechwriter to write his opinions for him???

    :-P

  • Yttik

    She’s gotten pretty darn specific in the last couple of days.

    I’m about as pro-choice as you can get, but I have to admit her article in response to the superbowl ad was simply brilliant. She wrote calmly and respectively about NOW, about women’s rights, about choices. She really is an architect, she’s redefining the issues. I want D’s to snap out of it, I want places like NOW to respectively join in the debate, I want liberals to reclaim their integrity on these issues, because they are losing the battle. Unfortunately people show no signs of getting it yet and I’m just wishing in the wind.

  • Docelder

    What’s with the democrats voting on these last minute things with their 60 head count, i.e. raising the debt ceiling without Scott Brown being there? Why is Kirk still voting as if he were a U.S. senator anymore? These people do not get it. Yes, that much is true. But, is this even legal at this point? And, if the senate will do this in a gray area, will they use reconciliation to pass health, and let the supremes argue over whether it was legal at some future date? Are we at the point in the senate where it is do what you will, and let the courts settle it? If so, has the senate body itself become a form of a Cloward-Piven tactic? Because, I could see the senate overwhelming the courts on their own if they keeo this up.

  • Sassy

    oowawa, I loved Wes Clark and was so hoping for him to be Hillary’s VP.
    Near the end of the primary, though, I felt she was forming a partnership with Evan Bayh.

  • Sassy

    LadyD,
    I love Sarah as well, but her appearance on Beck was a total yawner.
    She is going to have to go back to her “let it rip” attitude from the campaign trail. Of course that got her in hot water with the slush-mouthed pundits!

  • creeper

    Here’s the scoop on Rasmussen:

    “The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 25% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -17 (see trends).
    These updates are based upon nightly telephone interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. Nearly two-thirds of interviews for today’s update were completed before the President’s State of the Union address. Interviews conducted since the speech suggest that Democrats may have become more enthusiastic about the President. Little change was seen among Republicans and unaffiliated voters. However, it will take several days to see if there has been an substantive impact from the speech and follow-up coverage.”

    So the -17 only reflects the opinions of a third of voters after the SOTU.  What’s fascinating is that it was -17 yesterday, before any post-SOTU opinions were in.  No change, even with that third.

    Obama had better hang on.  I think he’s in for a wild ride.

  • Sassy

    Docelder,
    It looks as if they are throwing everything but the kitchen sink onto the floor and then “getting the hell out of Dodge”!
    There’s campaigning to do!

  • Onofre’s arm

    The avatar is a picture of an ancient ancestor of mine, it’s Bobo’s arm. He was the one who touched a 1X4X9 obelisk and gained the spark of reason.

  • Sassy

    Hey Ferd!
    You need to hang in here. You would not believe the Fruit Flies like Asitis and others who have gathered here!
    We are in the path of the snow and ice storm though, so we may have to twiddle our thumbs in the dark.

  • Docelder

    It seems to me that we are to the point that we now have an “activist” senate. We are seeing a “by any means” mentality on the democrat side of the senate. This is way past being dangerous to democrats, this is going into where it wil be dangerous to our form of government. Is the supreme court going to be arguing whether everything these guys pass was legal for the next decade? Seriously, are we being Cloward-Piven’ed from the inside now?

  • Sassy

    I agree Geoff!
    Distortions, rather than facts, play better in the political theater.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    The image of a Sharpei in a cfg. is priceless! Nancy’s wind tunnel face will freeze that way one day (my mother told me this can happen).

  • PortiaElizabeth

    jbjd — may God help us all if that ever happens!

  • Hokma

    You should read the Obama SOTU transcript and then read Reagan’s first SOTU from 1982
    In 1981 Reagan had his opposition (Democrats) running both the House and the Senate. In 2009 Obama had his own party (Democrats) running both houses but in larger numbers
    The speeches are strikingly different in tone. Those who are struggling to compare Obama to Reagan should first read their first SOTU speeches
    One interesting fact is that Obama uses the word “I” or “my” 95 times while Reagan used those words only 40 times. Reagan used the word “together” 10 times while Obama used it only 3 times. 
    The attempt to compare Obama to Reagan is not valid at all. Reagan was factual, engaging, and hopeful. Obama created myths, was confrontational and defiant. The proper comparison of Obama would be more like Nixon in his final year in office.

  • Onofre’s arm

    “One Day”? I’d say that day has already arrived.

  • JMM

    ALL of my posts disappear.  They stay up for a little bit, then poof, they are gone.

  • helenk

    http://www.dailytopseven.com/readmore.php?newsid=MTI4OA==

    Where did backtrack get his degree? Oh thats right we are not sure he got one.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • oowawa

    Aha!  A scene from 2001: the Dawn of Man.  The ancestor throws the bone up into the air, and it morphs into a spaceship.  You know, without the clue, I never would have figured that out.

  • oowawa

    and it would have driven me nuts

  • Onofre’s arm

    Sorry, I didn’t realize it was that arcane. I tried to find a better picture of the dawn of man, his acquisition of the spark of reason, recordings of such fleeting events are not only rare, but there are still some who would argue that it never happened. Judging by who we have as President, there’s some merit to that argument.

    If I could somehow attach “Also Sprach Zarathustra” to the avatar, I’m sure there would be little doubt about what it is about. :-D

  • Onofre’s arm

    The two houses of Congress in a joint session.

  • Docelder

    I have had the “likes” disappear, but not posts. I wondered if it wasn’t a caching thing, either the web server end or the isp end of it, in my case  Verizon Tampa caching the content. But, I don’t have the particulars to know.

  • oowawa

    Oh, it’s very cool–both in design & concept.  I remember reading a persuasive essay by some movie critic arguing why the bone-morphing-into-spaceship scene is the single greatest scene in cinema history.  Gives me cold chills just thinking about it!

  • stodghie

    article out hillary is quitting. :)

  • Onofre’s arm

    A controversial interpretation of the dawn of man.

  • Onofre’s arm

    A typical Wednesday Party Night in the White House.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Do we know he actually studied at Harvard? As we have never seen his records etc.
     
     
    Maybe he was just a janitor?

  • ~~JustMe~~

    God Ferd don’t say stuff like that….. hell you don’t want half of NQ standing on your doorstep one day, cause we missed u!  8-)

  • AC

    Onofre’s arm,
    Possible, but first we need a lower court judge to rule.  Like John Sirica rejecting executive privilege of the presidential tapes etc.  

  • AC

    First time I semi-agree with “Big Head Mathews–no it wasn’t “rope a dope”
    IT WAS A DOPE! 
    WHAT A RACIST Mo**** Fu****-he forgot Obama is black–what a jerk!

  • oowawa

    Tingler: “You know I forgot he was black for an hour.”  It’s clear, post-racial is working!  Today Chris Matthews (for an hour), and pretty soon, if we open our ears and keep them open, all the rest of us bigoted racist scum will all succumb to the charming eloquence of the man capable of erasing any awareness of color from the optic nerve.  Of course, we may need to I-Pod Thee One’s speeches 24-7 in order to attain the state of Lasting Postracialness. 

    For a while I thought Herr Olbermann was the King of Idiots on MSNBC, but it looks like Chris Matthews has regained his rightful throne.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    I’d like to hear abt your experiences with Howard Zinn, too, jbjd.  It sounds like an amazing time in your life, and I am sorry to hear of his passing…

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Yes, well said, Hokma!

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    ROTFLMAO – oowawa, you sure know how to turn a phrase!!

  • oowawa

    And once again, Tweety was seduced by Thee One’s “seductive” rhetoric.  Is this guy “easy” or what?  “Oh Mister Obama–make me tingle, seduce me with your verbal caress–your gently stroking yet firm honey words . . . “

  • Docelder

    What is that old saying about the easiest person to con is a con man?

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    I’d like to see that article (and I am pro-choice, too – like Hillary, I believe abortions should be safe, legal, and rare).

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Those are some mighty fine questions there.  It says a whole lot abt the mentality there, and Obama has the nerve to keep slamming the Reps for lack of leadership??  Please.  The Dems are just acting slimy.  I’m sorry – I never thought I wou;d feel like this, but they are just acting like a bunch of rats, scurrying around trying to get sa many crumbs as they can.  Blech.

  • Docelder

    They just can’t get over the card. This is just another attempt to tip their hand that they still hold the card without actually playing it… poor Barack, people still treat him “black”… yes, even the enlightened ones over at all white, all the time MSNBC. Woe is little Barry.

  • FLDemFem

    They may have been pre-screened, but they weren’t all happy campers. This story in the Washington Post has some interesting items in it..like this one.

    “Steve Gordon, who owns a company that makes water-saving devices, said he could hire 500 workers but could not get a bank loan — expressing a frustration that has plagued the Obama administration, which has been unable to get banks to lend to small businesses.
    “We are tired of dealing with banks,” Gordon said. “I know you care. I know you’re trying, and I appreciate the pledge of $30 billion to small businesses. But lending to the banks to lend to us is not the answer. It’s just not.”
    In his State of the Union speech, Obama announced that he will transfer $30 billion of repaid bank-bailout funds to community banks to lend. Gordon suggested that the Small Business Administration lend directly to businesses.
    Obama ultimately could say only that he sympathized with Gordon’s plight. “You should be aware that we have increased SBA loans during the course of this year, by 70 percent in some cases,” the president said.
    Gordon shook his head unhappily, and another audience member shouted, “It’s not enough!”

    And of course, he had to put in another cute story about how he and Michelle are just like other people..have to pay a penalty on early withdrawal from a 401K..

    “The president paused after a woman asked why the IRS continues to penalize struggling families for making early withdrawals from a 401(k) to get by, when corporations have been given tax breaks in tough times. Obama then shared that he and his wife, Michelle, had to do just that a number of years ago, when they had a family emergency And, yes, they had to pay the 10 percent penalty.
    “But it was what we had to do, Obama said. “And fortunately, we were young enough where we could absorb that hit. A lot of families aren’t in that position . . . it’s bad enough having to draw it down, but then also to have to pay taxes on top of it is really tough.
    He said his administration has considered a narrow set of exceptions.”

    They were young enough to absorb the hit..uhuh.. and living beyond their well-paid means to the point where they had two mortgages and a line of credit financed by their condo. I doubt that the lady who asked the question was in the same overspend boat that the Obamas were in. She probably needed the money for something important, like food, rent or medical care. The Obamas were overspending to live rich, not to keep body and soul together or a roof over their heads.

  • FLDemFem

    He went to Columbia for undergraduate work and Harvard Law School for his law degree. He did not graduate from Harvard University. And from what I have read, he got most of his grades by schmoozing the professors. To the point where they had an Obamameter which measured how good you were at sucking up. Seriously, they had a standard of sucking up that was set by Obama. So I think he was passed because the professors liked him and he kissed ass well, not because he is a brilliant law mind.

  • FLDemFem

    should have been “brilliant legal mind”. That’s what I get for posting and cooking at the same time!! And the Obamameter was at Harvard Law.

  • FLDemFem

    Leavenworth, Kansas..the supermax prison there is safe to hold a trial in, and it would cut transport costs after the trial too. Just march his scorched butt down the hall to his cell after the trial.

  • FLDemFem

    Leavenworth, Kansas. The Supermax prison there would be safe for the trial and it would save money on lots of stuff, like security and transport costs after the trial. Wouldn’t have to move the convicted prisoner far, just march him down the hall to his cell.

  • AC

    Hokma,
    You meant Junky (crack head) Lecturer, correct?

  • FLDemFem

    But..but…but….Obama said….




    “Obama seemed to relish tweaking reporters — the people with the “pens and pencils,” as he put it. “They got worked up last week. They said, ‘Is he trying to change his message? Is he trying to get more populist? Is this a strategy that he’s pursuing, to boost this, that, the other?’ ” Obama said, drawing laughs and applause.
    “I just have to do a little rewind here of how we ran our grass-roots
    campaign,” he continued. “Because I’ve got some news of my own here: I’ve been fighting for working folks my entire adult life.”

    There he goes, dissing the press. Oh, that could be a big mistake. Without the adoring media, he won’t last ten minutes. And he is partially right, he did fight for working people, himself and Michelle. But that’s about the end of the list of people he has helped.

  • FLDemFem

    Columbia University has confirmed he graduated from their school. His records are sealed, by him. Harvard Law School has confirmed that he got his law degree there. Those grades, and all of Obama’s school and scholarship records are sealed, by him.

  • cici

      top Christian Audigier   tanks
    http://www.lookedhardy.com

  • Mary cusack

    Hey spammy, if you want to advertise your web store there a link on top on how to PAY FOR YOUR ADVERTISING. 

  • Mark

    What the hell is post racial?

  • Mark

    Matthews forgot Obama was black for an hour because he has Alzheimer’s.

  • Cindy

    jbjd–Wow! That’s one helluva life experience you had with Howard Zinn. How wonderful for you. And I’m sincere when I say thanks for sharing. I love real-life stories like that.

  • Breeze

    MUST SEE THIS PICTURE OF ‘TWEETY’:

    http://afrocityblog.wordpress.com/

  • Cindy

    teak—isn’t this the part where Obama invites Alito over to the White House patio for a beer??

  • Cindy

    State of My Ego indeed. Funny!

  • Anonymous

    He’s got the inside track on the rail.

  • Hokma

    It’s when they’re told to take a horse named Rachael is put in the post position of a race :)

  • Docelder

    I liked this one the best for some reason. 8-)

  • oowawa

    Okay, fools rush in, so I’m actually going to try to answer this without resorting to the Urban Dictionary.  “Post racial” is a term that describes a future color-blind society that is so comfortable with being totally racially integrated that racial matters are no longer worthy of notice or mention. 
    Here’s one problem: as long as people like Chris Matthews can say “You know, I forgot he was black for an hour,” that ideal of a post-racial society is far distant, because by flaunting his post-racial hipness, he is trumpeting the fact that issues of race are front-and-center in his mind.

    Okay, I will resort to the Urban Dictionary: “Post racial is “an utterly imaginary and fictional term, much like “pixie-dust” because there is no such thing.”

  • Docelder

    I saw whole families on the news… dad, mom and kids holding tickets arriving there hours before and being turned away. They didn’t seem mad, just very disappointed. They did everything they were supposed to and were left holding worthless tickets. But, isn’t this the way with families now? Do everything you are supposed to do, and do it right and still get shafted. It isn’t right.

  • AC

    Ok oowawa, mess with our fun.  That was me as guest.  Not sure I like this system.

  • AC

    Ok oowawa, mess with our fun. That was me as guest. Not sure I like this system-having to resign in every time.  I like Hokma’s better so I’ll delete my first quip.

  • oowawa

    LOL, AC–I was busy pontificating when those came in and I didn’t see them.  Funny!

  • oowawa

    Thanks, Breeze!  Love the Tweety pic!  There’s quite a few funny pics & cartoons on that site!

  • AC

    Pontificate away.  I’m Catholic.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Thanks all.
    Thanks for the links oowaw.
    So BO was using a slight of hand; or in my mind an anology that was more akin to a BO trying to whack his way out of a sand trap.

  • Required Reading

    I think that after all the ice melts on the polar ice cap (supposed to happen in a couple of weeks, right?), I think we should coin the term
    “post glacial”

    After I go to an esthetician, my husband calls me a “post facial”

    After we get back from our vacation, my mother calls us “post Seycelle(s)”

  • oowawa

    Hmmm–I don’t have to resign in every time–does your browser allow cookies?

  • AC

    Yes, I’m using Opera and I had them turned off.  Just thought of a cure. Thanks for the reminder.

  • AC

    Yes, I’m using Opera and I had them turned off. Just thought of a solution. Thanks for the reminder.

  • AC

    Testing

  • AC

    Second test

  • oowawa

    Yeah Teak–he was kinda like trying to bamboozle us–and what the heck do we know anyway, clinging to our dictionaries and Wikipedia and whatnot . . . 

  • AC

    oowawa,
    Thanks.  Noticed  I needed  to accept cookie from JSkit .
    Will test again later but seems OK now.

  • oowawa

    Oh, these are funny Required Reading!

    After I got used to life at the nudist colony, I entered the post-bashful phase of enthusiastic exhibitionism . . . (okay, yuk)

    We are now entering the post-hopeful phase of the O Presidency . . .

  • AC

    test

  • Onofre’s arm

    Obama on the high court? I just had deja vu.

  • Hokma

    Seriously, the official White house definition of Post-Racial is complete agreement with Obama.

blog comments powered by Disqus