RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

State Of The Lobbyists Is Better Than You’d Think After The SOTU

Jon Stewart had Harvard Professor, Elizabeth Warren on recently to discuss TARP and Wall Street. It was an interesting interview, to be sure (h/t to Pat), and provided a historical perspective:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Elizabeth Warren
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Crisis


Let’s not forget who was in charge of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, shall we?? Barney? Chris? Ahem. Funny how that often goes unmentioned, isn’t it?

You wanna know what else is funny about this whole negative attitude toward lobbyists? Especially after Obama ripped on them again? That he INVITED THEM TO THE WHITE HOUSE FOR A PRIVATE BRIEFING THE DAY AFTER THE STATE OF THE UNION. I am not kidding, people – how many different ways can I say, “What a freakin’ hypocrite?????” Or, “How do people buy the crap that comes out of his mouth???” Holy smokes!!! Those of us who are sentient beings knew this was happening, that he was saying one thing, while doing another. But, c’mon, how blatant can he be that he thinks we are the biggest bunch of morons on the face of the planet??? And how can so many Americans BE such morons to buy this crap from him? Good grief, people, THINK!!!

So, here it is, in black and white:

[Snip] The Treasury Department on Thursday morning invited selected individuals to “a series of conference calls with senior Obama administration officials to discuss key aspects of the State of the Union address.”

The invitation, which went to a variety of stakeholders, was sent by Fred Baldassaro, a senior adviser at the Treasury Department’s Office of Business Affairs and Public Liaison.

The invitation stated, “The White House is encouraging you to participate in these calls and will have a question and answer session at the end of each call. As a reminder, these calls are not intended for press purposes.” (Emphasis mine.)

Yeah, I’ll just bet they aren’t:

The calls are scheduled to begin at 11:30 a.m. on Thursday, with the first topic being job creation and economic growth.

Another call, at 1 p.m., is on government reform and transparency. Republicans have criticized the Obama White House for not being more transparent in its discussions with Congress on healthcare reform. Obama recently acknowledged that the legislative process has not been as open as he promised on the campaign trail.

Other issues that will be addressed on Thursday include education, climate change and healthcare reform.

Oh, yay!! Doesn’t that make you feel better? Of course, they have been there all along, steering this Healthcare bill, from Obama’s original meeting with Big Pharma to the insurance industry lobbyists. Gee, can’ imagine why so many of us oppose this current bill: because we know what actually wrote it.

But Obama better be careful before he hurts their feelings:

A handful of lobbyists told The Hill on Thursday morning that they received the invitations and were planning to call in.

Some lobbyists say they are extremely frustrated with the White House for criticizing them and then seeking their feedback. Others note that Democrats on Capitol Hill constantly urge them to make political donations.

One lobbyist said, “Bash lobbyists, then reach out to us. Bash lobbyists [while] I have received four Democratic invitations for fundraisers.”

In his State of the Union on Wednesday, Obama once again targeted K Street: “We face a deficit of trust — deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap, we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue — to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; to give our people the government they deserve.”

So, um, this is how Obama expects to fix it? Invite the lobbyists to participate in these major issues facing the country? Well, sure, that makes sense. In the Upside-Down World of Washington, DC, that is.

And all in the light of day, right? Oh, sure, PollyAnna:

The Treasury Department referred The Hill’s request for comment to the White House, which at press time had not responded to questions on this issue.

On Thursday afternoon, White House spokesman Josh Earnest stated in an e-mail, “As part of our effort to reach out and engage with the public and policymakers, it is standard for our outreach team to organize a conference call, so that we can include people who are not in Washington, after a major speech or announcement through the president’s priorities. These calls are targeted at a diverse group of community and government leaders including mayors, governors, faith groups, women’s organizations, representatives from the African American and Latino communities to share as much information about the administration’s agenda as possible. The calls, which include question-and-answer sessions, typically include hundreds of people from across the country…”

Lobbyists say the Obama White House has held many off-the-record teleconferences over the past year.

For example, lobbyists and others were invited to a teleconference with “senior Obama administration officials” on Monday to discuss the administration’s plan to improve the lives of middle-class families.

The invitation, which is addressed to “Friends,” emphasizes in bold and italics that “this call is for background information only and not intended for press purposes.” It advises callers to tell the operator “you’re joining the ‘White House Briefing Call.’ ”

Another lobbyist said these types of teleconferences occur “all the time.” (Emphasis mine)

And that is why many on K Street are exasperated with Obama’s use of lobbyists as a punching bag. Some have said they understood why he used strong rhetoric on the campaign trail but are irritated the White House solicits their opinions while Obama’s friends in Congress badger them for political donations.

Don’t you feel sorry for those poor lobbyists who are shaping our policies?

Or do you feel anger that we have a government that is so duplicitous, so underhanded, so hypocritical, and so conniving?? Obama gets up there spewing this bullshit at the SOTU, and the VERY NEXT DAY, meets with K Street Lobbyists. And he does so with no shame, not even a hint that the impropriety gets through to him.

Wow. Show of hands – WHO bought this crap from him and the Democrats?? Anyone? Bueller?? And we wonder why this country is in such a mess…

  • AC

    I saw that the other day and Harvard Professor, Elizabeth Warren is very passionate and in my opinion very right.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Yes, indeed – she makes a lot of good points, doesn’t she??

  • oowawa

    Yes–Elizabeth Warren is impressive.  She seems honest.

  • Peggy Sue

    Too bad Elizabeth Warren hasn’t gotten much traction with the WH inner circle.  She’s very popular with the public and is able to crunch complex financial-speak into clear, understandable language. 

    She wrote an excellent essay several weeks ago, published over at huffy-pooh but still excellent, on what the ramifications were of a disappearing middle-class. It was strong and pointed, and it got a lot of hits. 

  • Kathleen Wynne

    Amy,

    Obama is a puppet for big banks and those power elites behind the scenes who want to break the financial back of American and then take  over as a one centralized bank whose goal is to rule over the rest of the world.

    Larry Summers and Tim Geitner are soldiers of an elite banker’s group.  Obama is the mouthpiece to keep the people under control with his brilliant oratory, while these guys work feverously behind the scenes completing their agenda.  Elizabeth Warren will never get the traction that will expose the destruction of the American economy.  I expect that if she does get any kind of real traction, we will not be seeing her on TV any more.

    People must us from what’s really going on behind the scenes.
    see obama for who he really is — a cruel hoax on the American people to deceive them with campaign slogans about “hope and change” in order to distract them away from the truth.

    Take away all of the rhetoric, the celestial choirs, the media adoration and it will be impossible to believe obama is nothing more than an eloquent speaker, groomed to lead the American people to their own destruction because he is telling them what they “want” to hear, thereby, blinding them to who he really is and what’s really in store for the American if we don’t keep the pressure on, like they did in MA, NJ and VA, to take away the unbridled power that have been given to the dems.  The same is true for the republicans.

    Then we unite and take back our elections from corporate money and corporate voting machines that have made all of this possible.

    It’s up to the American people whether they want to give up and live under control of the corporations or if we want to fight for the freedom and liberty that made America once the greatest counry on earth.

  • Tricia

    Do I see a new female Presidential contender if another great woman decides not to run?  Elizabeth Warren is smart, one of the best communicators, and appears to give a damn about the American people.

  • Ani

    She never will get traction either –certainly not with this Administration  — Warren is far too straightforward.  Sheila Bair is another one — she or perhaps Warren should have been treasury secretary.  We would be in better shape than with Timmy turbo tax Geithner.

    Great stuff, Amy.  Thanks for this article.

  • Docelder

    Nothing to add. Can we do it? I wish I knew that.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Excellent commentary, Kathleen. 

    Except I don’t think Obama is all that eloquent, either.  Without TOTUS, he stumbles and falls all over himself.

    Other than that, though, YES!!!  :)

  • Sassy

    I have seen Ms. Warren several times, and she is so forthright and intelligent.
    I’ve reached the conclusion, though, that with a few exceptions, the people we need are TOO smart to enter politics!

  • Docelder

    She has the “realness” quality that Palin has. This is what people want. The conservative/liberal part wouldn’t matter so much at this point to most people I think. I wouldn’t care myself. “Real” people would do the right thing in the end either way. I would love to see some politicians that weren’t corporate “cyborgs”.

  • mountainaires

    They’re so incompetent they can’t see that Americans will see what’s going on? 

    Or they’re so brazen they just don’t give a shit.

    That is the question….

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    You have a point there, Ani.  Yes, clearly she is too upfront to be in this administration.

    And thanks!!  I appreciate that!

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Well, that automatically counts her out as far as the Dems are concerned!  Ahahahahaha.  Ahem. 

    Well, except, it isn’t really funy.  Arent’ those the same qualities HILLARY has?  And look at how the DNC treated HER (and us)…

  • Jan, NC

    She makes some good points.  I would have also liked her to address the problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that were at and still are at the core of the housing problem.  Especially since the President signed that agreement to extend unlimited coverage to all of their loans right before Christmas.

  • sybilll

    Elizabeth Warren does indeed make good points.  But, legislating any part of the private sector reeks of Chavez-type governance.  And, why is it Fannie & Freddie are given blank checks, with no limits on their bailouts, which dwarf the TARP money, never given so much as a wristslap?

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Jan and Sybill, you raise geat points – I was surprised, too, thatshe made nary a mention of Fannie/Freddie.  BOth were major contributors in this economic crisis in which we find ourselves, yet receive very little attention.  Gee – can’t imagine why!

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    So, Tricia, that was in response to your comment!  Don’t know why it ended up down here…

  • AnnieCarmel

    Yes, and when the criminals see that the public is moving away from using their credit cards, paying cash and bringing down their balances, they try to make it impossible for the cards to be paid off by the gouging with Mafia interest rates, etc. 

    I can understand why people are defaulting.  Even if it isn’t due to bankruptcy…sorry boys it’s just business.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Ain’t that the damn truth, Annie?  I thought usury was illegal, but dang if these credit card companies aren’t able to charge almost THIRTY PERCENT interest, and not just for bad credit risks.  It is OBSCENE.

  • Sandy

    Who really cares what the DNC thinks or says anymore. If Hillary wants to run, I am hopeful that she will get full support. I know she will from me. I hope to be working on another HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT  campaign in 2012. And, the DNC has rigged their last election. All eyes will be upon them from now on.

  • AnnieCarmel

    I just received another notice from AMEX that they are reducing my credit limit: 1.  Because of my payment history with them…never late, never missed a payment, usually pay more than required…guess that isn’t good enough or any excuse is OK now.  Each time they reduce my available credit to only slightly over my balance, it lowers my points…which frankly I don’t even care about since as soon as this is paid off, I’m finished with credit forever.  This was my conclusion when they (without notice which they deny) bumped my 7.9% up to 21.99%…finally lowered to 20% the evil bastards.

    2.  Because I have a balance on other cards…even though my total is consistently being reduced each month.  Of course steam comes out of our ears when we see these SOB’s take bailouts, hand out bonuses and then gouge, gouge, gouge the consumers.  They deserve to be put out of business.  I will do my part.

  • AnnieCarmel

    I should add I look forward to their future offers of credit and telling them personally to go F**k themselves and why.

  • Linda Anselmi

    Excellent post Amy!

    Great point Tricia.  We need and our govt needs Eliz. Warren.  How about Labor Secretary in Hillary’s administration?  

  • http://sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/wall-street-reform-and-the-federal-reserve/ Wall Street Reform and the Federal Reserve « Sonic Ninja Kitty

    [...] the guest on Tuesday night, and she spoke about Wall Street reform.  I originally saw it posted at No Quarter and started out with a nice little comment.  Well, it got long (What?  You think I’m ever [...]

  • Sonic Ninja Kitty

    RRRA–Thank you for this post.  It’s a fantastic topic.  My comment got too long, so I’ve posted it at my blog:  http://sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/wall-street-reform-and-the-federal-reserve/

    Cheers!
    <!–[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:DocumentProperties> <o:Template>Normal</o:Template> <o:Revision>0</o:Revision> <o:TotalTime>0</o:TotalTime> <o:Pages>1</o:Pages> <o:Words>698</o:Words> <o:Characters>3979</o:Characters> <o:Lines>33</o:Lines> <o:Paragraphs>7</o:Paragraphs> <o:CharactersWithSpaces>4886</o:CharactersWithSpaces> <o:Version>11.1282</o:Version> </o:DocumentProperties> <o:OfficeDocumentSettings> <o:AllowPNG /> </o:OfficeDocumentSettings> </xml><![endif]–><!–[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:DoNotShowRevisions /> <w:DoNotPrintRevisions /> <w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery> <w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery> <w:UseMarginsForDrawingGridOrigin /> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]–> <!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Times New Roman”; panose-1:0 2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-parent:”"; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –> <!–StartFragment–><!–EndFragment–>

  • Sonic Ninja Kitty

    RRRA–Thank you for this post.  It’s a fantastic topic.  My comment got too long, so I’ve posted it at my blog:  http://sonicninjakitty.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/wall-street-reform-and-the-federal-reserve/

    Cheers!!

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Hey RR Amy whole posts have vanished your other one on blaming republicans or whatever it was has all just vanished. Reading thorough it one minute next POOF GONE?

  • oowawa

    Yep JustMe–a whole very active thread went missing: the-blame-game-aka-the-sotu-and-the-republican-response

  • Tricia

    I like that also.  Or Secretary of the Treasury.

  • cici

      top edhardy  boots
    http://www.lookedhardy.com

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Now y’all are talking!  :-D

    Abd Sandy, I hear you, but you know Hillary is wedded to the DNC< unfortunately…

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Sorry abt that – it’s BACCKKK!!  Ahem.

    Just so you know, when we bump up a post, or update it, that will happen.  Fortunately, all of y’all’s excellent comments are still there. 

    Sorry for any inconvenience!

blog comments powered by Disqus