RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama Admits Dems May Have Violated Their Pledge On Health Care

Tom Bevan posted Obama’s Stunning Admission on Real Clear Politics, discussing the President’s appearance at the House Republican retreat yesterday. He points out that no matter how much coverage has been dedicated to this “exchange of ideas,” or exercise in Presidential bullying, depending on your perspective, no one mentioned this rather shocking tidbit about the contents of Obamacare (Video) Barack Obama said the following:

The last thing I will say, though — let me say this about health care and the health care debate, because I think it also bears on a whole lot of other issues. If you look at the package that we’ve presented — and there’s some stray cats and dogs that got in there that we were eliminating, we were in the process of eliminating. For example, we said from the start that it was going to be important for us to be consistent in saying to people if you can have your — if you want to keep the health insurance you got, you can keep it, that you’re not going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your decision making. And I think that some of the provisions that got snuck in might have violated that pledge.

Bevan goes on to state:

If we take this statement at face value, President Obama is admitting the the health care bills passed by either the House or Senate (or both) contained provisions which were “snuck in” – presumably by Democratic members and perhaps on behalf of certain lobbyists – that would have in fact prevented people from keeping their current insurance and/or choosing the doctor they want.

This was one of the core debates on health care throughout last year: Would President Obama and the Democrats’ legislation allow government to come between citizens and their choice of doctors and insurers? Obama promised it wouldn’t. Republicans said it would, and this was one of the aspects of the legislation that led them to characterize it as a government takeover of health care – the same characterization that Obama chastized the GOP for today.

So even the President is admitting to this. Anyone protesting this debacle was called the dirtiest of names by the likes of the arrogant Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Steny Hoyer because we dared to question their 2,000 page health care monstrosity. The Dems may have snuck it in? Why would they try to do that? Don’t they have our best interests at heart.

I do not recognize this party anymore. Even Dianne Feinstein made the comment that we just couldn’t understand the depth and breadth of this legislation. Apparently, we understood it a lot better than certain folks would have liked us to.

Though the President brazenly behaves as though the American people trust his every utterance, the latest Rasmussen Reports polling on the President’s SOTU speech show just how deep that trust deficit has become.

The president in the speech declared that his administration has cut taxes for 95% of Americans. He even chided Republicans for not applauding on that point. However, just 21% of voters nationwide believe that taxes have been cut for 95% of Americans. Most (53%) say it has not happened, and 26% are not sure. Other polling shows that nearly half the nation’s voters expect their own taxes to go up during the Obama years.

The president also asserted that “after two years of recession, the economy is growing again.” Just 35% of voters believe that statement is true, while 50% say it is false.

Obama claimed that steps taken by his team are responsible for putting two million people to work “who would otherwise be unemployed.” Just 27% of voters say that statement is true. Fifty-one percent (51%) say it’s false.

Perhaps trust might be reclaimed by realizing one basic principle. The time for transparency is before and during negotations on important legislation — not after the fact, when someone has spent the better part of a year trying to shove it down the American gullet, while denying the very thing they now admit to be true. Further, what assurances do the American people have that as health care legislation continues to morph in Congress, more of these types of dangerous provisions won’t be “sneaking in.”

Health care reform is necessary. Congress first needs to prove they can be trusted to repair and improve the current system before we hand them the reins to gut it altogether.

Here’s a hot flash, Mr. President. I like my doctors. I like my health care plan. I don’t want anyone messing with it, especially if what they are offering will degrade the level of care my family and I now receive.

  • FranSC

    Considering that rambling, jumbled, and restarting of sentences in mid sentence that you quoted, Ani, I was shocked and then disgusted when one of the guests on ”Reliable Sources” today was describing how well 0bama did at the republ retreat Friday.  She said something to the effect, “The republicans are probably sorry they invited the president and no doubt forgot *how fast on his feet he is*.  If that’s fast on your feet, that guest has very low standards for that skill.

    It reminds me a little of an exchange between Sally Quinn and Ben Bradlee when Sally had a job interview with the man who would later become her husband.  “Can you show me something you’ve written?” asked managing editor of the WP Bradlee.  “I’ve never written anything,” admitted Quinn.  Pause.  “Well,” said Brandlee, “Nobody’s perfect.”

  • Anonymous

    Got snuck in … who talks like that

    The moosh man at the top!

  • Jackie S
  • Ani

    No worries, my dear!

  • FLDemFem

    Arabella, the “stray dogs and cats” certainly explains the listing, in one version of the bill, of veterinarians as “health care givers.” I mentioned that to my vet, who treats my horses, and he said he wasn’t interested in taking on any two-legged patients.

  • FLDemFem

    He would have signed it anyway. He owes his election to the special interests who would have made million, or even billions, off the bill. Obama doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the average American, he just cares about himself and what he can get out of this gig.

  • I’m a Linda too

    o/t but worthy a shout out.

    WOOT, Scott Brown starts with hiring the women!

    “(CNN) – Senator-elect Scott Brown, R-Massachusetts, has turned to political veteran Gail Gitcho to oversee his communications operation.”

  • I’m a Linda too

    And, while we’re talking about Obama’s Freudian Slip, thinking that would make the opponents of his HI MED bill to change their mind and support the bill, knowing full well they will be keeping and adding not just stray cats and dogs, but rats and street kill to the bill, did everyone miss his apology for lying, accusing, name calling all the opponents of his HI MED bill?  Sure flew by me.

  • I’m a Linda too

    And of course, now that I did that, it’s on the bottom, not here where you and I commented.

    I think I need some of time…..brain cells not firing properly these days.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Great post Ani. Wow, this shows America Obama is the liar, not the Republicans or the Conservatives, Indes or the Dem’s who called to “Kill the Bill” or the TEA Party Moviement. 

    Isn’t it funny? Obama finds the words WE, not I, when he doesn’t want to take the blame for his directive. He says I when he wants to take credit for something good. OH, HE IS A WEASEL.

    ” For example, we said from the start that it was going to be important for us to be consistent in saying to people if you can have your — if you want to keep the health insurance you got, you can keep it, that you’re not going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your decision making. And I think that some of the provisions that got snuck in might have violated that pledge.”

  • I’m a Linda too

    OMG…I’m so sorry Ani.  GREAT Post…and now I have to go fix that.  It’s onnly fair. :)

  • Ani

    Thanks, Linda — actually, it’s Ani…

    And yes that’s a great point – I hadn’t noticed his sudden use of the word WE.  Good catch.

  • Sassy

    The polls on health care legislation have consistently shown that the public does not want this plan.
    Americans, in all age groups, have marched in protest against it.
    Voters, in three state elections, have rejected it.
    Democrats are on the losing end, but they persist in putting us in jeopardy of losing our benefits.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Great post RRRA.  Wow, this shows America Obama is the liar, not the Republicans or the Conservatives, Indes or the Dem’s who called to “Kill the Bill” or the TEA Party Moviement.

    Isn’t it funny?  Obama finds the words WE, not I, when he doesn’t want to take the blame for his directive.  He says I when he wants to take credit for something good.  OH, HE IS A WEASEL. 

     ” For example, we said from the start that it was going to be important for us to be consistent in saying to people if you can have your — if you want to keep the health insurance you got, you can keep it, that you’re not going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your decision making. And I think that some of the provisions that got snuck in might have violated that pledge.”

  • arabella trefoil

    Stray dogs and cats? What will Obama do with these stray dogs and cats? It’s a problem that must be addressed forthrightly.

    First of all, PETA will be all over Obama’s ass. (And as much as I hate Obama, wishing the wrath of PETA to descend upon anyone is not a wish I make easily.)

    First of all, where did these stray dogs and cats come from? Where are the provisos for free spay and neuter clinics. (For the stray dogs and cats, not for the humans).

    Second of all, why did Obama obtain a pedigree dawg for a White House pet, when so many shelters offer animals for adoption. Could it be that President Obama did not meet the criteria for being the guardian of animal? We will never hear the facts, my friends.

    And dare I say that Obama himself could lead the way by adopting some of these stray dogs and cats as pets.