RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

ailes vs. huffington – who’s inciting who, exactly?


Today on This Week, Arianna Huffington (owner of Huffington Post) tried to confront Roger Ailes about Glenn Beck.

“Aren’t you concerned about the language that Glenn Beck is using, which is, after all, inciting the American people?” Huffington asked him. “He did say one unfortunate thing, which he apologized for, but that happens in live television. So I don’t think it’s…I think if we start going around as the word police in this business, it will be…”

Then Huffington added:

“It’s not about the word police. It’s about something deeper. It’s about the fact that there is a tradition as the historian Richard Hofstadter said, in American politics, of the paranoid style. And the paranoid style is dangerous when there is real pain out there.”

Ailes responded by citing HuffPo commenters.

“I agree with you,” he said. “I read something on your blog that said I looked like J. Edgar Hoover, I had a face like a fist, and I was essentially a malignant tumor…Then it really went nasty, and I thought, gee, maybe Arianna ought to cut this out.”

You really should watch this video here. It’s long, but the look on her face is priceless.

Arianna responded to Ailes’ comments: “That was not by anybody we approved of..”

Then, later, near the 11:40 mark, she said:

“Words matter. And words that are actually being used by people we hire are different than words that are being used by commenters on our site like you mentioned.”

Trouble is, the words Ailes is talking about are from this article:

What “Ailes” Cable News? Rupert Murdoch’s Evil Genius
Bill MannTV-Radio Critic,
Posted: January 12, 2010 01:28 PM

“But we haven’t heard nearly enough about the secretive, security-encircled Ailes, who’s arguably done more to spread fear and hatred in this country than anyone since Joe McCarthy.

J. Edgar Hoover lookalike Ailes, who has a face like a clenched fist, is a long-time TV veteran who once produced Mike Douglas’ inane chat show (the late George Carlin mentions Ailes’ unpleasant demeanor way back then in his recently released “Last Words”). Ailes has used cynical but well-worn TV tactics to pump up his cable carnival-attraction net’s ratings: fear and eye candy.”

Then there’s Fox’s sexy visuals. A look at Fox’s commentator/anchor lineups shows a predominance of attractive blondes (long called “newsbabes” in TV newsrooms), but these blondes, who cynically appeal to the network’s testosterone-poisoned male demo, are willing to be venal and nasty — e.g., Megyn Kelly, Gretchen Carlson, and disgraceful human oddity Ann Coulter.

“Unleashing the likes of sideshow attraction Glenn Beck, schoolyard bully Bill O’Reilly, and Gumby lookalike Sean Hannity on the airwaves is something traditional broadcasters would have never done – back in the days when the FCC actually yanked people’s licenses, that is.

So, while Fox News, as the Times story stresses, may be a financial success story, it’s also a malignant tumor on the body politic. For that you can thank Roger Ailes.”

Then, in an attempt to further this lie, they posted an article:

Roger Ailes On “This Week”: Defends Glenn Beck, Insists Fox Is No Longer At War With Obama

Lamenting the “word police” tone of the questions being lobbed his way, Ailes would go on to note that he had been subject to some ridicule on the pages of the Huffington Post. The offending remark, a review of the site showed, came from an anonymous commenter and, unlike Beck, not by anyone on this news organization’s payroll.

oh.my.gawd! What a friggin lie. Either it was a lie or they are the worst investigators/researchers, evah!

(And did you notice all of the ugly personal attacks directed at the employees of FOX in Mann’s article? I can tell you this – no one turned me off of Obama faster than his supporters did on Huffington Post.)

UPDATE: LOL! Good thing for screen caps! Now they have changed it to read:

“Lamenting the “word police” tone of the questions being lobbed his way, Ailes would go on to note that he had been subject to some ridicule on the pages of the Huffington Post. The offending remark did not come from anyone on the Huffington Post’s payroll and, was on top of it, misquoted by Ailes.”

Give me a friggin break! What happened to *words matter* Arianna? They don’t matter as long as you aren’t paying someone to write them, even though they are on your web site? And what is this, “was on top of it, miquotes by Ailes.” Are they KIDDING? He wasn’t quoting the friggin article, he was retelling some phrases/words he had read on HuffPo. Good gawd….he *misquoted*… misquoted what? Sounds like he was spot on.

What a joke.

  • lark

    I watch Glenn Beck very often when I go into the kitchen to cook before 6:00 p.m. I actually like to begin cooking about 5:30 now to watch him a little bit more. I regret that I hardly ever watch his first half hour. I find him to be the best of them all – trying to really really give us the truth – even when it hurts. All the rest are pure entretainers, but Glenn Beck does it for the sheer service – SERVICE that he offers as a news commentator.

  • jbjd

    AGI, I am reading this in the middle of class – students are working together on a handout – and so, I cannot play the video right now.  But this article is PRICELESS; I am smiling ear to ear.  (Coincidentally, I am working on my next article, which describes that the Boston Globe ‘disappeared’ MY comment; and it says so, right on the screen.  As you say, thank goodness for screen caps.)

  • tango

    I know, I know. I remember how it’s ok for posters there to say the most nasty vile things about Sarah Palin. I got sick to my stomach when someone actually posted a most horrific post about how her youngest child should’ve been killed along with his blank blank mother and slutty sister with her blank blank bastard child.  I mean the language and intent of that post was sickening.  I never went back to see if it was deleted. And then they scream that hatred and extremism of the far right is damaging to the country and defines anyone who is Republican?  I think either extreme, left or right, is damaging and inappropriate.

    Arianna getting all worked up about Beck is a joke. She ought to also call out the lies spoken by those fine commentators on MSNBC while she’s at it. She wouldn’t give a damn if it wasn’t for the fact that Beck gets ratings. If he was stuck on some radio somewhere getting 10,000 viewers (like Air America, snerk   :-D    )  she wouldn’t care.  As Nicole Wallace said today on MSNBC, Obama would be well served to listen to the “paranoid” element that watches Beck and others like him because they are only echoing some of what’s going on in America. Americans are scared of some of those things Beck talks about. And while Obama pooh poohs them and his Administration treasts anyone who is concerned about Americas future as irrelevant and unimportant, watch Beck continue to get ratings.  

  • Tricia

    AGI–I saw this live yesterday.  I am SO glad you wrote this story (and did a great job of it I might add).  People get SO riled up without realizing that the sacks they are carrying on their own backs are filled with the same mucky junk.

    I was worried when Arinana started off–Ailes had that look of a hound dog that has just spotted prize prey. 

    One lesson to Arianna–don’t take on anyone who has 30 IQ points on you.

  • Breeze

    Well, ‘TheWon’ is too busy bowing to ‘important people’ to care.

    This time it’s Pam Iorio – Mayor of Tampa, Fla.!

    http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2010/01/31/more-groveling-by-obama/#comment-3319

  • Hillary or Bust

    Speaking as someone who had considered myself a Democrat and a liberal up until 2008, I am seriously tired of the left’s whining and bashing of Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh.

    It’s pathetic.

    They can’t compete on substance. All the left does is whine and point fingers and smirk about how stupid the unwashed conservative masses are. Then they call names and talk about how “extreme” “Faux News” is, without once acknowledging how extreme and marginal many in the far left actually are.

    Having listened to both Rush Limbaugh and Keith Olbermann, I am sorry to say that Rush beats Olbermann in intelligence, wit, style and substance. By a longshot. And I don’t agree with everything Rush says, but the vast gap between actual substance and just loud-mouthing ranting (Olbermann) is bigger than the Grand Canyon.

    And while Beck can get hysterical at times, his points about the vision of the founding fathers are good ones and I think it’s a positive he’s reminding us of them constantly…whereas the left would like to ignore America’s roots and pretend we’ve transcended all that stuff “freedom and liberty” stuff to become Chris Matthews’ vision of a “postracial” America where we can forget our president is black for an hour.

  • helenk

    http://www.dailytopseven.com/readmore.php?newsid=MTMwNg==

    What will the impact on the internet if backtrack does this?

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • WestVirginia304

    HufPo Co-founder and former Columbia University professor Kenneth Lerer and wife Katherine Sailer are active fundraisers for the Democratic party. According to the New York Times, on April 9, 2007, they co-hosted a $2,300/plate fundraiser for Barack Obama at their Central Park West apartment in New York.  Just, FYI.  Consider the source.

  • oowawa

    Thanks for this interesting article, American Girl.  In considering any controversy with Arianna Huffington at the center, it is prudent to consider her history.  I remember her days as a California right-wing radical who was active in promoting her husband Michael’s career and right wing causes in general on talk-radio.  Some bits from her Wikpedia article:

    “Huffington’s politics began changing in the late 1990s. A former “right winger” who supported Newt Gingrich’s revolution and Bob Dole’s candidacy for president in 1996, she moved noticeably to the left and now describes herself as a “progressive populist”. During the Yugoslav Wars, Huffington opposed United States intervention in the crisis.[6]

    Her first foray into the Internet was a website called Resignation.com, which called for the resignation of President Bill Clinton and was a rallying place for conservatives opposing Clinton.”

    Well, anyone can change their perspective; I know I sure have.  Arianna is full of energy, attractive, can talk a mile-a-minute sounding like Zsa Zsa, has led a life that is wildly implausible, and has been all over the map politically.  If I were Thee One, I would be hesitant to count on her allegiance!  Here’s an overview of her career from a right-wing perspective:

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2010

  • Ani

    Great article, AGII.  Arianna Huffington should hang her head in shame.  I will never forget the 2008 primary and I will never forget the headline banners in red bold letters across the whole page smearing and saying the most horrible things about Hillary Clinton.  Huffington is the boss and she puts the tripe out — I hope she’s happy about the candidate she pushed — she wanted him, she got him.

    She has some nerve talking about hate speech — yes, words do matter and some of the articles in her damned paper, not to mention the disgusting comments, would take the hide off a rhinocerous.

    She is an opportunist.  Just like Dowd and Kos and the rest.

  • buzzlatte

    Most will find that Arianna Huffington is really rather useless in the biggest of pictures.  

  • Retired

    Anything the right says is “hate speech,” anything that the left says is “truth.”  Do they think that we aren’t on to them, yet?  Watch in November.

  • Cindy

    lark—i agree with you about Beck, even though I think he would scare me if he came to my house, but that’s beside the point.
    He’s  definitely providing a service of information that no one else has the guts to do.

  • HARP

    I would pay real money to watch Megyn Kelly debate anyone from MSNBC.

  • Cindy

    I used to know Arianna socially, when she was still married to Michael.
    Let me just say that her makeup, hair, and wardrobe are always at the very top of her list of what’s really important in her life. Glenn is at least down to number four.
    Thanks for posting this info, AGI!

  • Sassy

    Fox News, in a recent poll, was deemed the most reliable of all the networks by 48% of those surveyed.

  • Cindy

    Hillary or Bust…..very well-stated. I totally agree.

  • Alessandro Machi

    Huffington Post needs to apologize for their acidic coverage of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential race. I collected some of the over the line headlines that were used on Huffington Post against Hillary Clinton in 2008.

    http://alessandromachi.blogspot.com/2008/06/huffington-post-prints-another-hillary.html

  • sarainitaly

    i just updated the post – i realized my hyperlink to the video wasn’t working. :S

  • AnnieCarmel

    tango, Yes, I remember how my call during the primaries for a moderate tone on Huff&Puff about Hillary got slammed again and again until I simply stopped going to the site.  Good though because that’s how I found NQ.  I truly believe that had I been in the same room physically with some of the HP posters, they might have threatened my life.  Truly vile. 

    And the posts about Sarah?  Coming from the most sexually promiscuious people in the universe…the Left…laughable.  An assumption?  No, sorry but proper, civil people don’t speak in that manner  or lack any sense of boundaries.  They are all about tearing down all manner of propriaty and civil discourse. When Sarah Bernhardt made those threatening, disturbing remarks against Sarah Palin, I really knew they had scraped the bottom of the barrell…where they continue to stay. 

    Arianna had the gall to come to Monterey back then and speak on Ethics in Communication.  Hey, Ms Huffington, just because you speak it doesn’t make it true.  You are the living embodiment of that lie.  She gave me the biggist and most cynical laugh of the week.

  • oowawa

    HaHa HARP–Yep–the tigress could eat Tweety and Herr Olbermann both for lunch and still have lots of room left for dessert . . .

  • SYD

    This is now the yarn they spin…. that anyone who questions them is “dangerous” and ought to be silenced. But they (the likes of Arianna) take no responsibilitywhatsoever for the irresponsible (*dangerous*) things they print… or allow to be printed.

    As a Liberal, and former Democrat, I agree with the sentiments above. Cut with the whining, Arianna (and ilk.) It amounts to no more then the pot calling the kettle black.

  • AnnieCarmel

    Wonder whether they also invited a contingent of Black Panthers as a further treat for the $2300 ala Leonard Bernstein back in the 60′s?  Tom Wolfe’s little book  “Radical Chic and MauMauing the Flak Catchers” was a classic report on the cluelessness of the monied Left.

  • Lyn

    Sorry OT, I didn’t see an open thread
    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/01/atlas-exclusive-obama-organizing-for-communism-and-youth-corps-in-the-public-school-1.html
    An Atlas reader, Chuck, has a student in the eleventh grade in an Ohio High School. Her government class passed out this propaganda recruiting paper so students could sign up as interns for Obama’s Organizing for America
    There is a picture of the application, students (High school AND college) will get school credit for campaingning FOR obama..min 12 hours per week

  • oowawa

    LOL–I thought my old finger just wasn’t clicking fast enough . . .

  • oowawa

    Still not working on my computer, Sara.

  • kenoshamarge

    So would I Harp! She’s smart, tough and also incredibly attractive. And she starts her new program today if I’m not mistaken. She precedes Shep Smith’s Studio B.

    And she would rip any one of the phonies from MSNBC a “new one” before they even got their brains out of neutral. And that includes the Rhodes Scholar Rachel Maddow. Tweety would have more than a tingle running up his leg, he’d likely have a stream running down it.

  • Ani

    Alessndro,

    I went to your blogsite — thank you so much for the wonderful job you did gathering the HuffPo hit squad posts on Hillary.  Since I ran screaming from their site during the primary, I missed much of this, though I knew they were trashing her daily from other sources braver than I who wandered into that sewer and reported back. 

    I appreciate your work on the subject.  This really does need to be catalogued.  I have had enough revisionist history to last a lifetime.

  • Required Reading

    I saw parts of this program; first time I had seen Ailes and was impressed with his even-handedness.  Meanwhile, here are some words that really matter from today’s WSJ.  I know this falls under the category of “preaching to the choir” but it’s so edifying to see a talented writer tell the story like it is, that I wanted to share:

    Fouad Ajami, “The Spell is Broken”
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704094304575029110104772360.html

  • AnnieCarmel

    Thanks for the link.  “Republican strategist Ed Rollins (who managed Michael Huffington’s 1994 campaign for the California Senate) once called Arianna Huffington ‘a domineering Greek Rasputin” who was ‘the most ruthless, unscrupulous, and ambitious person I’d met in thirty years in national politics’.”  Pretty accurate I’d say.  Not to mention the biggest hypocrit of all time. 

    I found it interesting that she was a follower of Rashnesh.  I knew a couple of people who went up to live in the commune in Oregon.  I’m hardly a prude (is anyone who survived the 60′s?) but the stories of the sexual free-for (whenever, wherever and with as many as possibe…as the gateway to “enlightment”) left me feeling repulsed and embarrassed at how they were manipulated and taken in.  It’s no wonder she fell for the O-Cult.

  • PA Caucasian

    Arianna is Zsa Zsa without the high camp value.

  • samb

    Arianna, you know down deep in the dark corners of your black heart, you want Beck. you can’t stop saying his name, It’s time you to confront your inner conservative and make peace with it.  
    :-P

  • Tex-Mex Soup

    How ironic, that many of us on here (safe assumption) despised Fox News at one point and time.  Now I watch them 90% of the time.  I’ve tried watching CNN and I can’t and msnbc is just a friggin mess and are pathetic beyond comprehension.

    I am sick to my stomach with the hypocrisy the democrats or faux liberals display.  Perfect example, that boob, rachel maddow is so shocked that a women lost in the Massuchusetts election but yet she is a certified ass kisser to obama a m-a-n and she completely stabbed Hillary Clinton in the back. 

    Why is it ok to hate one woman and have a fake outrage for the treatment of another.  Sorry it does not work that way.  You can have outrage for anyone *IF* that person has let us down period. It does not matter their gender, however you can’t pick and choose based on your  hypocritical views.!!

    Whats good for the goose is good for the gander Arianna!!

  • AnnieCarmel

    Thanks for the link.  “Republican strategist Ed Rollins (who managed Michael Huffington’s 1994 campaign for the California Senate) once called Arianna Huffington ‘a domineering Greek Rasputin’ who was ‘the most ruthless, unscrupulous, and ambitious person I’d met in thirty years in national politics’.”  Pretty accurate I’d say.  Not to mention the biggest hypocrit of all time.   
     
    I found it interesting that she was a follower of Rashneesh.  I knew a couple of people who went up to live in the commune with him in Oregon.  I’m hardly a prude (is anyone who survived the 60′s?) but the stories of the sexual free-for (whenever, wherever and with as many as possible…as the gateway to “enlightment”) left me feeling repulsed and embarrassed at how they were manipulated and taken in.  It’s no wonder she fell for the O-Cult.  The Left never changes…leaving me to wonder what Arianna’s next incarnation will be?

  • PA Caucasian

    hahahaha

    These tactics would work if our society  hadn’t degraded to the point that youngsters’ main concern is X-box and what pics to sext to their boy/girlfriends.

    I don’t think we have to worry much about 0bama youth stomping through the streets.

  • oowawa

    Yep Sara, the link to the video is now working fine.  Like an old fool I just kept clicking on the pic below the link expecting it to start working . . .
    It’s a fascinating roundtable!  I have never seen Krugman so lame; Will made him look like a child, IMHO.  Krugman’s remark that the health plan was scuttled because “there was somebody in Massachusetts that doesn’t know the Red Sox” was particularly outrageous.

  • dst

         She , Huffington, has always been a pathetic moron. I think it was the night before the 97′ SOU  speech and she and fellow Republican punitive and Kelly (now) Conway on the Charles Grodin Show were busy tearing Bill Clinton up over Monica L. and both got the kicks predicting no one would watch. Next day Bill pulled in the largest audience to watch a SoU Speach to that point.
     

  • dst

    She , Huffington, has always been a pathetic moron. I think it was the night before the 97′ SOU  speech and she and fellow Republican punitive  Kelly (now) Conway on the Charles Grodin Show were busy tearing Bill Clinton up over Monica L. and both got the kicks predicting no one would watch. Next day Bill pulled in the largest audience to watch a SoU Speach.
     

  • Cindy

    Arianna is Zsa Zsa without the high camp value.

    Well, so far, at least. It’s early, yet.
     LOL, PA!!

  • dst

    She , Huffington, has always been a pathetic moron. I think it was the night before the 97′ SOU  speech and she and fellow Republican punitive and Kellyanne (now) Conway on the Charles Grodin Show were busy tearing Bill Clinton up over Monica L. and both got the kicks predicting no one would watch. Next day Bill pulled in the largest audience to watch a SoU Speach.
     

  • oowawa

    “Safe assumption” indeed!   I used to rail against FOX also.  What has really changed is that the other networks, most notably MSNBC and CNN, drank the kool-aid and are still trying to pass it out.

  • oowawa

    leaving me to wonder what Arianna’s next incarnation will be? 

    I don’t know–but Thee One better watch his back . . .

  • dst

     I used to rail too, but along with what you say about the others, Fox is also far better now then before
    http://video.foxnews.com/v/3996128/panel-plus-131  . Also it was hard to sound inteligent supporting GWB and now it has reversed.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Sara — thanks for posting about this round table. I’m another who walked away from HuffPo after being excoriated for defending Hillary in 2008. My husband watched the discussion yesterday and came away wondering if Barbara would be turning it into The View.

    I enjoyed the smackdown of Arriana, but I had to laugh as George Will was listing a few of the missteps from the SOTU address. Paul Krugman’s eyes seemed to get larger and more surprised with every word. He looked not so much like a deer in headlights as he did like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Was he shocked that people noticed the inferior quality of the Great Orator’s words?

  • dst

     I used to rail too, but along with what you say about the others, Fox is also far better now then before 
    http://video.foxnews.com/v/3996128/panel-plus-131  . Also it was hard to sound intelligent supporting GWB and now it has reversed.

  • jbjd

    I put a one line comment on that thread – “Not all young people are easily duped.” <a hred=”http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/”>OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF BABES</a> – and in the last 2 days, I have received hundreds of hits from her blog.  Hot Air posted her link and someone there posted a comment about MY comment on Atlas; and I got a couple of hundred hits from Hot Air.  I also got a hit from the White House Facebook page (?). 

  • oowawa

    Thanks RR–excellent article.

  • jbjd

    jbjd<img style=”cursor: pointer; display: none;” src=”http://cdn.js-kit.com/images/icon10-external-url.png” title=”http://jbjd.wordpress.com”/>
    I put a one line comment on that thread – “Not all young people are easily duped.” <a href=”http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/“>OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF BABES</a> – and in the last 2 days, I have received hundreds of hits from her blog.  Hot Air posted her link and someone there posted a comment about MY comment on Atlas; and I got a couple of hundred hits from Hot Air.  I also got a hit from the White House Facebook page (?).

  • jbjd

    I put a one line comment on that thread – “Not all young people are easily duped.” <a hred=”http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/“>OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF BABES</a> – and in the last 2 days, I have received hundreds of hits from her blog.  Hot Air posted her link and someone there posted a comment about MY comment on Atlas; and I got a couple of hundred hits from Hot Air.  I also got a hit from the White House Facebook page (?).

  • jbjd

    I put a one line comment on that thread – “Not all young people are easily duped.” <a href=”http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/out-of-the-mouths-of-babes/“>OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF BABES</a> – and in the last 2 days, I have received hundreds of hits from her blog.  Hot Air posted her link and someone there posted a comment about MY comment on Atlas; and I got a couple of hundred hits from Hot Air.  I also got a hit from the White House Facebook page (?). 

  • Anonymous

    Yes, If I were to watch the news I would watch FOX or BBC World. The rest of them is the same as reading the Enquirer. On second thought, the Enquirer is probably a step above MSNBC.

  • oowawa

    The expression “femme fatale” comes to mind . . .

  • jbjd

    I wrote this one line comment on Atlas Shrugs, “Not all young people are easily duped,” followed by this link:  OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF BABES .  I received hundreds of hits from this, both from her blog and then from Hot Air, who had posted a link to her article, under which link on Hot Air, someone else had posted my comment.

    It’s funny, PA C; you think we are safe because the youth are preoccupied.  I think we are safe, because, they are not, once we adults engage them.

  • Required Reading

    oowawa — it’s articles like Ajami’s that make me proud to be “post hopeful” – to use your great phrase from way downstream …. :)

  • Anonymous

    How many of us were banned from commenting on Huffington Post because we supported Hillary Clinton? I couldn’t believe it when it happened to me.

  • WestVirginia304

    I just read that article.  ”he himself now owns up to the “remoteness and detachment” of his governing style.”  He is not remote or detached.  He is dazed and confused.

    He has no idea of where he is or what he should do.  He reminds me of a third string wide receiver waving his hands in the air, jumping up and down and not even bothering to turn around and stop cheering himself after the other team has run away with the ball.

  • oowawa

    LOL–I’ve only made one comment on HuffPo–way back when.  At that time I sagely observed that nobody with the name Barack Hussein Obama (rhymes with Osama) could ever win the nomination.

  • oowawa

    I love analogies like this, WV304.  To riff on the theme: the real problem is that he’s not only the receiver waving his hands, he’s also the quarterback, and he’s trying to figure out how to throw  the ball to Himself, run for a touchdown, then do an end-zone celebration dance to thunderous cheers without involving anyone else in the spotlight.

  • meileen

    i, too, was banned from commenting on huffpoo. i had signed up there within the first or second day of its launch, then all of a sudden, they would not post my comments. and the feedback from folks trashing hrc was juvenile at best and should have been stopped by moderators. instead, they stopped the voices of those against what the democratic machine was doing. bass ackwards.

  • FLDemFem

    I called the Stark County Republican Party, which is the county where the school in question is, and told them about it. Also sent them an email with the link. I just called to follow up and they couldn’t find my email, which was weird because I use AOL and their email addy is on AOL, so they should have had no problem. But the nice young man told me she uses Outlook, so it may have been sorted differently or something. So I gave them more info and the link location over the phone and they are going to look into it.

  • buzzlatte

    That was before (I just sure) the DNC so creatively gave Obama the nomination. Oowawa, you weren’t so far off!  LOL!!!

  • buzzlatte

    That was before (I’m just sure) the DNC so creatively gave Obama the nomination.  Oowawa, you weren’t too far off!   ;)

  • Obama: Dubya 2 Electric Boogaloo

    I was booted off of Dailykos back in June 2008. At the time I was shocked that candidate disagreement would lead to a mass purge, but as I stand back now and look at it all, it comes as no shock now.

    Back in the day on Dailykos no expletive deletive was left out to describe GOPers. They’re evil, assholes, vile, they want to kill you, they hope all non-GOPers die, etc etc. In that entire time I don’t think I actually met a GOPer in person or on line who was as vile and dangerous as we made them out to be.

    Now, since I didn’t drink the Obama Kool-Aid I have since been called by all-accepting liberals and progressives a racist, a teabagger, a right wing hater, a capitalist pig, an idiot, a moron, falling for right wing propaganda, etc.

  • felizarte

    I wonder why she kept her ex-husband’s name (Huffington)  If I recall they divorced right after Mr. Huffington revealed that he was gay.  

  • AnnieCarmel

    Just thinking of THE CHILDREN, no doubt.

  • AnnieCarmel

    LOL!

  • AnnieCarmel

    Maybe MeShill too!  Hahahahaha…now there’s a pair from Hades!

  • Alessandro Machi

    Thanks, I did one about MSNBC and the “media” assault on Hillary Clinton as well.  http://fair-reflection.blogspot.com/2008/08/never-forget-media-bias-in-2008.html

  • AnnieCarmel

    Mine constantly went to moderation…and my comments were always civil and moderate and regarding Hillary.  Guess that explains it

  • PortiaElizabeth

    I don’t think I was ever banned, but they seemed very selective about which of my posts got published. I made it a point not to use expletives when commenting because I foolishly thought that would cause my most impassioned rants to be axed. I still found that my replies (some in defense of my original position), were deleted while Obots continued to label me with every vile name they could think of. I finally realized I was being censored while the haters were not.
    I’m so glad to’ve found No Quarter where people can disagree without resorting to sophomoric insults.

  • oowawa

    LOL–We should all start a support group for people who were kicked off of Huffpo!  Oh, I guess we have one here!

  • Alessandro Machi

    Then there was this one…kind of creepy looking at it now and how the media just went overboard against Hillary Clinton.

    http://alessandromachi.blogspot.com/2008/05/media-is-addicted-to-hating-hillary.html

  • oowawa

    Yes, you also lept off the interesting story regarding   her exit from the right-wing radical gig she had going on!  She went trough a very messy divorce from her right-wing husband who ran for Senate or Governor of California.  He lost, but rigght after the lost Adriana filed for divorse.  Part of her filing papers contained info regarding her husband’s sexually?  Affairs with other men, wonder what she thinks about,Larry Sinclair allegations?????

  • Steve1

    Sorry regarding name, ment to type in my name, instead typed yours???

  • Anonymous

    HUFFington suits her right down to the ground. She’s no Smith or Jones those names are so normal…

  • stodghie

    tricia, i imagine that ailes had looked at who he would have on the panel and was prepared in advance with some good comebacks when they tried to slice and dice.  but it was a good zinger ;)

  • ~~JustMe~~

    HUFFington suits her right down to the ground. She’s no Smith or Jones those names are so normal…

  • stodghie

    tex mex soupd i am in the same boat as you. glad to know who is at the oars with me.

  • stodghie

    i too didn’t last at huffpo after defending hillary. no free speech there

  • DaddysDarlin

    I too have become a listener of Glenn Beck.  I used to be a liberal democrat, but I have reemerged as an conservative Independent. 
    WOW HOW DID THAT HAPPEN?  With all that went on during the 2008 elections, the blatant way Obama cheated and had his goons cheat for him, I was completely appalled.  Hillary was her usual graceful self, and I honor her, but I will never again be affiliated with any political party again, especially the democrats.  Now I might reconsider if there we maybe a
    TEA PARTY CANDIDATE!  I could get into promoting that.  I am tired of all the liars like Huffington, if the world isn’t seeing things her way, they are a bunch of idiots.  She sounds just like Pelosi.  Get rid of the lot of them, Huff, Obama,Pelosi,Reed, and the entire democratic senate and house.
    We must start over, begin again, because what we have here is a failure to communicate, we’re talking but no-one is listening. 
    Obama can you hear us now, perhaps after the 2010 elections!

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Who knows then maybe Meghan Kelly will invite “Thee One” over for an on camera chat. Now that would be fun!

  • PA Caucasian

    To your point, I heard an anecdote about Tea Party protestors attracting the “interest” of young 0bama supporters, they accosted the tea party group (verbally). The protestors engaged the 0bama youth, explained to them the issues and that they were doing this for THEIR future (the kids). The young people ended up staying for the rally.

    This was in Tampa.

  • jangles

    How can someone with the cv/biography of Huff Puff become a voice of influence and punditry in our political system?  I read the background piece you had on her and remember her involvement here in CA politics.  Her bio screams—nut case.  How can people like Beck and Huffington and Daily Kos etc get a national megaphone?  Their presence on our political landscape is as unsustainable as O’s.  And while they are parading their idiocy, the Clinton’s are shredded.  Upside down.

  • jangles

    I find Beck troubling.  Way too emotional/theatrical.  I do not want theater in politics.  I want informed, critically thinking people who can and do take effective action.

  • oowawa

    Yes.  MSNBC is devoted to making straight the Way of Thee One, casting rose petals before his divine footsteps.  The Enquirer doesn’t care whose muck they rake; they aren’t going to kowtow to anyone.

  • DeeLee

    PA Caucasian, How do you think Hitler got started?

  • ~~Justme~~

    Yes good to see you posted here too jbjd I very nearly crossed posted yiur comment from Atlas here last night but was called away!

     you think we are safe because the youth are preoccupied.  I think we are safe, because, they are not, once we adults engage them. So true!

  • jbjd

    PE said, “I’m so glad to’ve found No Quarter where people can disagree without resorting to sophomoric insults.

    It all depends on your definition of “sophomoric insults,” I guess.

    Larry Johnson
    JBJD, 
    Are you kidding?  Are you really that uninformed.  Terrorism has not changed for the worse.  If anything, the threat has dramatically narrowed.  You obviously have no memory of the Rome and Vienna airport massacres.  You ever hear of Pan Am 103.  Grow up!
    Friday, January 08, 2010, 15:16:03

  • oowawa

    Yes jangles–he needs to restrain the theatrics.  For example, the blackboard is covered, and he uses it as a tease until the grand unveiling at the very end–and it’s something boring and mundane.  It reminds me of the scene in Christmas Story when Ralphie excitedly uses his brand new Little Orphan Annie decoder ring to decode the secret message and it’s, ta-da!  “Remember to Drink Your Ovaltine.”  What a letdown.

  • jbjd

    AGI, your “Update” reminded me of Rolling Stone, which first headlined BO using the word, “Radical…” and then revised this to read, “Destiny’s Child…”
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/03/15/rolling-stone-changes-headline-obamas-radical-roots-destinys-chi

    (I don’t know if ‘Newsbusters’ is a good source but the story is true; I just needed a quick cite.)

  • Breeze

    felizarte<img src=”//cdn.js-kit.com/images/icon10-external-url.png”/>
    I wonder why she kept her ex-husband’s name (Huffington)

    ————————————————————————————————–

    Well, Arianna STASSINOPOULOS is not so easy to pronounce and remember,
    especially when she had BIG  plans for her future…

  • candymarl

    What amazes me is Krugman on that panel.  He still seems to have the same attitude that the American people just don’te get it re: Health Care Bill.. He doesn’t understand that people have actually read the thing and still don’t like it. He also says that a super majority is necessary for any bills to pass. Yes, the Repubs, as stupid as they were, did not need a super majority to pass many things GWB wanted. They didn’t have a super majority for the Iraq War.  They didn’t have a super majority for the stimulus bill.  I am not a Glenn Beck/ Fox fan. But I can count. Since Obama has been in the WH he’s had a far larger majority than GWB. Yet there’s nothing the Dems can do? In my lifetime I’ve seen both parties override Presidential vetos whithout a super majority.  What’s wrong with this picture?

  • Ani

    Thank you for includign both of these — I’ll go look.  Great job!!

  • Katmoon

    This happened to myself as well. being a Hillary supporter meant I was treated as food.

  • Katmoon

    Agree on the theatrics, it does seemingly take away credibility. then I remember, Beck is a commentator, not one who actually provides the news. I listen with one ear, no singular broadcast from any of them has my support, as prior to the 2008 election.

  • getfitnow

    Ditto–well said. I started listening to Rush during the primaries. He is way to the right of me, but in terms of broadcast style there are probably few who are as proficient. The left has been trying to bring him down for a long time; his ratings keep growing and so called progrssive shows are dropping like flies.

    The left would have you believe that Rush is a racist. He is a lot of things, bombastic not being the least, but the man is not a racist.

  • felizarte

    You have a point, Breeze–plus it sounds so foreign, although with a US president named Barack Obama, it shouldn’t feel so strange anymore.

  • oowawa

    Exactly, candymarl.  Krugman seemed clueless.

  • donjo

    The senate could pass a bill with 51 votes right now that would change the supermajority figure to 50 – or whatever they damn well chose.  Someone needs to ask Harry Reid why this HAS NOT BEEN DONE?  THe old saying, “the inmates are running the asylum” is true of congress and particularly the senate.

    BTW, if anyone believes a word from these right/left media loonies, then this country is seriously in trouble.  Liars all – and not a hint of feeling bad about it from any of them.

  • Ladydawnelle

    Right ON !

  • Alessandro Machi

    Its important to connect the relationship between Arianna Huffington and George Soros.  I did a bunch of research on that topic back in 2008.  The very first link within the article is chilling as it reveals Arianna’s ongoing hatred of Hillary Clinton.

    http://caucuscheating.blogspot.com/2008/07/george-soros-and-his-power-grab.html

  • Alessandro Machi

    lol, I got banned for what I wrote on http://www.hillary-wins.com

    I actually was kind of expecting it after I wrote the articles linking Arianna Huffington to George Soros.  http://caucuscheating.blogspot.com/2008/07/george-soros-and-his-power-grab.html

  • Rosa

    has this been in the msm?  scary

  • AnnieCarmel

    Thanks, I’ve sent it on to a few of the newly awakened as  further support.

  • Sassy

    donjo,
    The 60 vote super majority was designed to protect the rights of the minority in the Senate.
    The democrats change that at their own peril, for they will be the minority again…soon, I hope!

  • PizzaDriver

    word, tango.  the tone on BOTH sides is scary, so to see arianna acting all indignant and outraged about beck is pretty rich.  i visit “Democratic” Underground on a regular basis, and as AnnieCarmel said, it seems quite likely that a person’s physical safety could be in danger if they were in the same room with some of those folks.  they constantly use violent imagery like “crush, destroy, anihilate, slap down,” etc., and needless to say, anyone who doesn’t agree with them is evil incarnate.  the censorship is also very disturbing; wouldn’t want to see the moderators there get their hands on the Bill of Rights.

  • donjo

    I think the 60 vote thing is or was a recent thing and it CAN be changed at will by whomever has the votes.  From what I’ve heard, it’s not set in stone.  There is no magic in the number 60 -it could be 55 or 90.  In any case, the 60 vote requirement works in just the opposite – it doesn’t protect the rights of the MAJORITY, you know the guy who won the election. But for goodness sake, we must not upset the republicans – they might not support anything the dems offer.  Oh, I forgot – they already do that. 

  • donjo

    I think the 60 vote thing is or was a recent thing and it CAN be changed at will by whomever has the votes.  From what I’ve heard, it’s not set in stone.  There is no magic in the number 60 -it could be 55 or 90.  In any case, the 60 vote requirement works in just the opposite – it doesn’t protect the rights of the MAJORITY, you know the guys who won the election. But for goodness sake, we must not upset the republicans – they might not support anything the dems offer.  Oh, I forgot – they already do that.

  • PizzaDriver

    jbjd, NQ is not perfect, that’s for sure, it’s a lot better than a lot of sites, in terms of less censorship, and more actual rational discourse.

  • stodghie

    i was shocked i tell you when i was banned for posting at daily shlock. then i moved on to better things while cuss took it over the ledge with the lemmings on the left.

    i had the gall to defend hillary. ever notice how these so called independent blogs all turned on a dime at near the same time? food for thought!

  • Sassy

    Traditionally, every piece of legislation, except for appropriations, is subject to the 60 vote rule. That is the basis of a filibuster.
    Changing the vote requirement is called the “nuclear option”, and neither party wants to go that route, for it will haunt them in the future.

  • FLDemFem

    Alessandro, you mean they banned you for something you wrote on another site?? That is ridiculous!! SAnd very fascist, come to think of it. I never posted on any of her sites, including her first one which called for the resignation of Bill Clinton. And I see no reason why anyone should pay attention to anything a Greek bimbo who married a gay guy for his money would have to say. Thank God she isn’t an NBC, so she can’t run for president.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Oooh, I did not see that one. Things that make you go hmmmm…
    May I ask which thread that was on? 

  • PortiaElizabeth

    FLDemFem — we know that’s no longer an obstacle. ;)

  • sarainitaly

    same with me. exactly!

  • AC

    JBJD,
    That’s Larry imparting his warmth for your comment whatever that was. =-O

  • jbjd

    PE, the day and date of the post are in the comment.  But the underlying point of my response is this:  I did not ‘ban’ Larry.  No; this would mean, abandoning what has rightly been descibed as one of the most inclusive intelligent commuities of bloggers out there.  No; instead, I only boycott his threads. (If you go looking, reading all of the comments posted on the thread will  in question will provide a fuller picture of what occurred.) 

  • jbjd

    PE, the day and date of the post are in the comment.  But the underlying point of my response is this:  I did not ‘ban’ Larry.  No; this would mean, abandoning what has rightly been described as one of the most inclusive intelligent commuities of bloggers out there.  Instead, I only boycott his threads. (If you go looking, reading all of the comments posted on the thread will  in question will provide a fuller picture of what occurred.)

  • Cindy

    FlemDem—-But the most cynical thing she did was KEEP Michael’s last name. That name was gold. Her father-in-law was the second wealthiest man in Texas at the time of her marriage. She wasn’t about to part company with that name. And the senior Huffingtons were bosom buddies with the Bush family. They lived across the street from them in Houston.

  • jbjd

    AC, my moniker is “jbjd.”  (For some reason, LJ used all caps.)

  • Cindy

    oowawa, a support group like—–My name is Cindy and I used to comment on HuffPost.     “Hi, Cindy!”

    Actually, my claim to post-on-blog fame was having a knockdown dragout verbal  (written) fight with dailykos……actually, with his Lordship Markos, himself.  The year was 2005, and I was in a mood, and not a good one.  Markos was such a jerk by that time and I let him know it. Anyway, I’m pretty proud of that moment in blogging history.  And I’d like for Meryl Streep to play me in the film version :*

  • Anonymous

    ” it doesn’t protect the rights of the MAJORITY, you know the guys who won the election.”

    As opposed to the rights of the MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE who don’t want Obama’s healthcare bill?

    When will you guys face reality?  If the MAJORITY of Americans wanted Obamacare, the Republicans could not stop it.  The Republicans face zero political risk by fillibustering because the MAJORITY of Americans don’t want this bloated, corrupt, deficit-exploding turd.  If the bill wasn’t such a stinker, the Dems would still have 60 votes.  There’s no fillibuster in the House, but Pelosi couldn’t even get a simple majority to pass the Senate stinker.

    Obama’s problem isn’t the fillibuster.  His problem is the will of the people.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Been dazed and confused for so long, it’s not true.
    Wanted a woman, never bargained for you.
    Take it easy baby, let them say what they will.
    Will your tongue wag so much when I send you the bill?
    8-)

  • TeakWoodKite

    Meow!

  • jbjd

    Sassy, since when has the prospect of self-immolation deterred the D’s from pursuing their desired result?  (See, for example, installing BO into the WH by rigging the voting at the primaries/caucuses and rigging the votes at the RBC meeting; bribing the SD’s; and lying to state election officials that they had ascertained he is Constitutionally qualified for the job, just to get them to print his name next to the D on the general election ballot.)

  • jbjd

    PE, the day and date of the post are in the comment.  But the underlying point of my response is this:  I did not ‘ban’ Larry.  No; this would mean, abandoning what has rightly been described as one of the most inclusive intelligent commuities of bloggers out there.  Instead, I only boycott his threads. (If you go looking, reading all of the comments posted on the thread in question will provide a fuller picture of what occurred.) 

  • Cindy

    Guest—i agree with you. That’s what makes the Dems’ whining so ridiculous-sounding. Their own people are lukewarm. I can’t believe the insidious Dem talking point about how  ”the Repubs are obstructionists”….pathetic.

  • FranSC

    lark, I agree.  Beck has got a huge staff who does its homework – he is not sitting there talking off the top of his head. 

    I’m amazed at the people who think he is a raging maniac.  He is not!  I will never be as conservative as he is and therefore question some of the things he gets on.  I bristle every time he uses an opportunity to put Hillary in the same boat with 0bama – like her debate comment, “I am a modern progressive”or how Hillary studied Alinski.  If Hillary is operating like 0bama seems to be with all the people around him hell bent on turning everything upside down, it is a deep dark secret.  Beck does not seem to understand that the democratic party leadership didn’t just select the nominee, they were very destructive toward Hillary – the thing I will never forgive them for. 

  • FLDemFem

    I think she is just like Markos over at DKos, a mole for the Republicans. Between the two of them, they have alienated lots of old-time Democrats, like me. I used to post over at DK, but when they started trashing Hillary, and then trashed her supporters with obscenities, I left. Arianna and Markos, in my opinion, are two people who are responsible for lowering the tone of political discourse until it can’t be differentiated from the squabbling of sewer rats.

  • Sassy

    jbjd, The democrats got themselves in a world of hurt when they filibustered many of Bush’s judicial nominees. Remember the gang of 14?
    I think it takes 3/4 of the Senate to change the parlimentary rules that donjo wants changed. The democrats do not have 67 votes, and even they aren’t stupid enough to start down that slope, and the republicans did not either.
    I agree whole-heartedly with you concerning the “non-election” however!
    Good luck with your work!

  • Sassy

    jbjd, I saw that thread, and it is not the first time this has happened.
    That type of discourse unnerves me, for it is like families shying away from an abuser after happy hour.
    I may get slammed as well. So be it!
    My question is why NQ writers look the other way, and then continue to write about sexism and disrespect in politics?

  • AC

    Sassy,
    Good Morning, help me out here.  Do you recall the title and or date of the thread/post. Thanks

  • yowzas

    “I’m so glad to’ve found No Quarter where people can disagree without resorting to sophomoric insults.”

    hahahahahahahahahahaha that’s the funniest thing I’ve EVER seen on this blog. 

  • PortiaElizabeth

    yowzas — so glad I could amuse. You’ll notice I said, “can disagree” not “do disagree”. Yes there are some who insist on the devolution of a debate into the realm of schoolyard bullying tactics, but I still think the majority here try to be civil even in disagreement. Nobody’s perfect, so sometimes even saints can lose it, especially when a troll persists in being intentionally confrontational.
    I’m one of those who, for the sake of peace, try not to engage certain people on this site because it’s just too predictable what the outcome will be. If I find someone being bullied or there’s what I consider to be an egregious wrong, I usually do speak up.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Sassy and jbjd — I tried twice last night to get into the archives to read what you mentioned. Both times the site froze up on the page and wouldn’t let me in. I can imagine what happened though and it honestly leaves me astonished. I read here almost daily, so I’ve seen examples similar to yours. I’ve read replies from our host that are civil and respectful and I’ve seen some that are angry and filled with expletives. I don’t know the code for determining which post gets the rant and which doesn’t. So, for the most part, I try to focus on the posts from the regulars whose responses don’t burn my eyes.  

  • jbjd

    http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2010/01/08/republican-bogus-terrorism-talk/

    Again, please, read ALL comments in order to maximize the chances to gain a clear understanding of what occurred, in context.

  • Sonic Ninja Kitty

    This post is beautiful–HA HA!!!

  • Cindy

    Sonic—– I haven’t seen your name here for ages!