RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Eligibility Challenge, State-by-State: Act II

By Dr. Kate on August 14, 2008 at 11:40 PM in Barack Obama, Citizenship, Current Affairs, Democratic Nomination

In a previous post I suggested that there was an urgent need to make known and make use of the stunning information revealed by TexasDarlin and researchers regarding the potential ineligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President of the United States because of certain “technical” matters related to his legal name, birth certificate, and multiple citizenship. 

These mere “technical” issues are those which may result in his removal from the ballot, but unless these are covered and widely reported, Senator Obama/Soetoro will never fully be vetted and a potentially fraudulent candidate will be nominated.  At the same time that I support all efforts to get to the media, print and otherwise, I think it may also have strategic value to work at your state level too, in a way that by-passes the Obots.

This would be our last chance, before the convention, to convince the superdelegates that something is wrong with “The One”–something that is perilously wrong.  So far they have been impervious to solid, factual arguments of policy, his use of the race card, his arrogance, shocking lack of knowledge, his flip flops, misogyny, and friends and associates.  I’d like to send them a little shock and awe…

My thinking is that if we immediately initiate a few state-based efforts to challenge Obama-Soetoro’s technical qualifications–legal name, birth certificate, citizenship–that these efforts will begin to generate calls to the DNC and Obama campaign, and state-based research, that will call attention to weaknesses of Obama-Soetoro.  And if we launch this effort in a few key states-say Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Indiana—and enough questions are raised, Senator Obama-Soetoro and the DNC are going to have to comply with this information or risk having his name removed from the ballot. 

Already there have been efforts initiated to the Secretary of State (SOS) of New York, and suggested efforts to the Attorney General of the state of Hawaii. These letters form good “templates” for work in your state, and are posted at TexasDarlin.

In otherwords, Barack-Barry, it’s put up, or shut up and step down time. You know, fish or cut bait. Lead or be led right out of here. If you can prove it and explain who you are, fine. I still won’t vote for you. But its more than time for you to be forthright with the American people.

Below is a draft of a letter to a Secretary of State of your state that can be used as a template for a letter to your SOS, letters to the editor, letters to delgates, etc.  This letter draws upon and references, as required, the work of TexasDarlin, and would include some of the articles at her site.  Of course, no letter should be copied verbatim, to protect the original author and effort, but it does contain what could be used and a short summary of the findings to date. 

All should modify this letter as a tool with the new information that is posted almost daily at Texasdarlin and here at NOQuarter.  Already I see places this letter could be refined, as you will too. My hope was to put up an “action tool” for your working pleasure.

Depending on how comfortable you feel, you may or may not want  your name publicised with this effort.  It is our right as American citizens to have this information and to know who we are voting for. Good Luck!

Subject: Eligibility of Senator Barack Obama

Dear Secretary___________:

I am writing to express my concerns about, and request your assistance in certifying, whether Senator Barack Obama is eligible under Article II of the U.S. Constitution to be placed on the Presidential ballot in the State of ________. I understand that the Secretary of State’s office (SOS) relies primarily on the state and national republican and democratic parties to certify a nominee’s eligibility, although it retains the final authority on eligibility along with other SOS offices. Respectfully, it appears in the case of Senator Obama, a full verification of eligibility may not have been conducted.

I do not write this letter in frivolity and without basis, and set forth in the pages below and attached references the reasons why I am concerned. I believe that serious questions remain unanswered, and although I am a life-long registered democrat, my pleas for information from the campaign, and local and national headquarters of the Democratic Party have been met with deafening silence.

Respectfully, I seek your review of the following materials, and if you believe it to be significant, your assistance in verifying Senator Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the ballot in __________.

Background

Article II of the U.S. Constitution states , in part, that:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

That “natural born” citizenship can be passed to children who are born abroad by one or more parents who are American citizens is not in doubt. The requirement to be a “Citizen of the United States” is interpreted to mean allegiance: as the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, the President must have only one allegiance, and that is to the United States.

It is my understanding that the singular purpose of Article II is to ensure that the President of the United States has absolute allegiance to the United States. Naturalized citizens are specifically excluded from serving as President by virtue of having had or having citizenship from another country, that is, divided loyalties. U.S. law says nothing about dual citizenship; only that some people have it. However, if naturalized citizens cannot be President because they have previously had another allegiance, then dual citizens by nature would not meet the test of Article II.

Statement of the Problem

Given this background, the major concern I and many others have is whether Senator Obama meets both criteria, as to “natural born” and “American citizenship”. To wit:

  1. Falsified Birth Certificate? In June, Senator Obama published an electronic image of his Hawaii Certification of Live Birth (COLB) on his campaign website next to the words “the truth about Barack’s birth certificate.” It is still there (see http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert). Since that time, at least two independent forensics and documents experts have concluded that this image of a COLB, proffered by Sen. Obama as his true birth certificate, is a forgery (references attached). Furthermore, the image that Senator Obama proffered appears to be a forgery of his half-sister’s Hawaiian birth certificate, although she was actually born in Indonesia. I have attached reference documents containing the original reports.

    a. As you know, the falsification of COLB-style forms is relatively simple because of technological advancements in digital and computer applications. However, the very existence of the computer-generated black block where the Certificate Number should be on the proffered form is suspect and, in accordance with the document’s own language about alterations, would invalidate the certificate. For this reason alone, investigation is warranted.

    b. Researchers believe that Sen. Obama’s birth records in Hawaii may reveal a different legal name—“Barry Soetoro”– as a result of his adoption by an Indonesian citizen; that adoption would have resulted in Mr. Obama’s subsequent acquisition of Indonesian citizenship. I am concerned that Sen. Obama may be intentionally concealing these facts from the electorate.

  2. Dual and/or Multiple Citizenship? The Rocky Mountain News reported that Senator Obama had and may still have Kenyan citizenship. Other reports, which are attached, indicate that Senator Obama had at one time, and may still have, Indonesian citizenship resulting from his adoption by an Indonesian citizen in 1965. As is required by Article II, the President must not have divided loyalties; he must have only one allegiance.
  3. Use of the 14th Amendment to Claim Eligibility instead of Article II? Senator Obama’s official campaign website states that the Senator “is a U.S. citizen under the 14th Amendment”. Section I of this amendment states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. Why was there a need to mention the 14th Amendment instead of Article II as an eligibility criterion? Is Senator Obama a naturalized citizen?

Notwithstanding the fact that Congress cannot change the Constitution, Senator Claire McCatskill, along with Senators Obama and Leahy, sponsored a successful, but unnecessary resolution “certifying” John McCain’s eligibility to serve as President that contained these clauses:

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President ; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, that John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

Frankly, this resolution, and the use of the 14th Amendment on Senator Obama’s website does not sit well with me; and the disturbing “coincidence” of this information with the forged birth certificate and potential multiple citizenships—without any explanation from Senator Obama or the Democratic National Committee–is what motivated me to write to you.

  Summary

As a voting American, I am not satisfied that I have enough information on Senator Obama to measure whether he is eligible for the Presidency. I worry for our Country should a candidate who does not meet the Article II criteria win the Presidency. Senator Obama must at the very least provide adequate documentation of his background to have his named placed on Wyoming’s Presidential ballot.

Mr. Secretary, I am prepared to accept that my concerns are unfounded if Senator Obama or the Democratic Party can provide these assurances to the voting public, or if your research can prove conclusively that he meets the eligibility criteria. Unfortunately, ordinary citizens like me cannot take on the burden of certifying presidential candidates, and in the presence of compelling information to suggest he may be ineligible for the office he seeks I urge your consideration of the attached materials.

I must emphasize that this request is not racially or religiously motivated, nor is it out of some partisan desire to have another candidate nominated. My concern is that of an American who loves her Country and believes in the rule of law.

Because of the hostility I have already experienced, and the threats to my safety and career that I may incur by openly challenging Senator Obama’s eligibility for the Office of the President, I respectfully request that my name be withheld from the public, democratic or republican party officials, or other public officials in any discussion of this issue. I can be reached by you or your staff at ____________________.

Thank you in advance for consideration of these issues.

Sincerely yours,

Enclosures–These are the 12 papers on TexasDarlin’s site by Judah Benjamin & Texas Darlin regarding (a) the birth certificate, and (b) citizenship. See text and list below.

 Footnotes to letter–these were the footnotes to the letter above, mainly documenting references.  I was unable to place them in the text here (unskilled at html!), but you can probably guess where they go in the text of the letter.  I am happy to clarify as needed.

1. This was clarified by the United States Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103,104) stating that the “children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens.” In this way, birth and allegiance are linked.

 2. “Divided Loyalties: Obama’s Eligibility Problem: Part I”. Author Judah Benjamin. Report attached to this paper.

 3.See Israeli Insider, online edition, August 8, 2008, “Claim: Obama’s birth certificate forged from sister Maya’s.”

 4. Because of the intimidation and threats that Obama critics face, the authors of these articles have thus far remained anonymous. However, your office should have other means of verifying the authenticity of these reports, and could consult with them if required.

 5. Although much is known about Senator Obama’s Kenyan roots from his writings, little is mentioned in his own writing or others about his Indonesian background.

 6.Even if Senator Obama took steps to renounce earlier citizenship, there may still be problems under Article II, but these should be handled in a court of law or some other forum, not concealed from the voting public.

  7.See: http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html . Senator McCain’s eligibility to serve as President was challenged and successfully resolved in 2000 and in 2008, and was a matter of U.S. law long before these two challenges. Thus the resolution could not have been solely about Senator McCain. Did the first clause above attempt to create a blanket allowance for foreign born citizens to be labeled “natural born”?

  8.George Romney (Mexico); Barry Goldwater (Arizona Territory). Romney did not advance to nomination, and Goldwater was defeated by Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

  9.I have no explanation for why the Democratic Party, the Obama campaign, the mainstream media, or the Republican Party are not forthcoming with all the necessary documentation for an office that requires extreme scrutiny of all personal alliances, health status, selective service registration, eligibility criteria, academic records and publications, and other information. In addition, I am just one of hundreds of thousands of people across the country who are asking for the same information. Perhaps in the excitement of the 2008 primary season, some of these basic questions were overlooked, and perhaps these data will be provided to each SOS once Senator Obama is officially nominated.

Here is the Enclosure disclaimer and list of articles:

ENCLOSURES

The following enclosures are articles representing significant research conducted by various authors that began in June 2008 with the investigation of Senator Barack Obama’s web-posted “official” birth certificate. The research led to more serious questions of Senator Obama’s eligibility, under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, to serve as President of the United States.

Please be aware that throughout the critical examination of Senator Obama on the internet—which has not been covered by the main-stream media—individual authors on Democratic/Progressive blogs have had to remain anonymous, post under pseudonyms; have been threatened physically, stalked over the internet (a federal crime), and have had their websites or personal computers hacked, attacked, or shut down. It appears that there are many people who do not want this information to be made available to the general public.

Therefore, before the information is dismissed automatically because it is internet-based, please take a look at the content. Your office should have the same resources, and more, to independently confirm all of the material herein.

****

Birth Certificate

1. Forensics Expert: Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery, Techdude, July 20, 2008

2. *Breaking* Techdude Finds Original Text on Alleged Obama Birth Certificate, Techdude, August 3, 2008.

3. *Breaking* Obama Hides Indonesian Identity: Fake Birth Certificate Explained, TexasDarlin, July 31, 2008

4. *Breaking*: Sister Maya’s Name Uncovered on Alleged Obama Birth Certificate [Update], TexasDarlin, August 5, 2008

5. Obama: The Forged COLB and a New Mystery, Judah Benjamin, August 5, 2008

Citizenship and Eligibility

6. Divided Loyalties, Obama’s Eligibility Problem—Part I, Judah Benjamin, July 25, 2008

7. Divided Loyalties, Obama’s Eligibility Problem—Part II [Revised], Judah Benjamin, July 26, 2008

8. Links and Bibliography, Divided Loyalties Parts 1 & 2, Judah Benjamin, July 1 2008

9. Obama the Indonesian: Citizen of the World?, Judah Benjamin, July 28, 2008

10. The Paper Trail: Obama’s Indonesian Background [Revised], Judah Benjamin, July 30, 2008

11. Obama: A Disaster Waiting to Happen, Legal Challenges Imminent?, Judah Benjamin, August 2, 2008

12. Obama’s Dual Citizenship Disaster: An Overview, TexasDarlin, August 10 2008

  • prabhata

    These letter might work with Republican secretaries of state, but not Democrats. Also, given that the Republicans worked hard to make sure Obama was the nominee, I don’t see the Republicans going against their best interest. I guess I’m one of those people who gives up easily because I see the empty part of the glass.

    • Dawnelle

      well this time you are being logical and realistic!

      NONE of them want HILLARY!

      we’re gonna have to do this on our own (but go for it to those that think it could help)

      gnite fine PUMA & NoQtr Bloggers!

    • HARP

      prabhata…. Give up ? Where the Hell do you think we would be if everyone gave up at Bunker hill or at Omaha beach or after Pearl Harbor. TexasDarlin spends hours digging for the truth on this Bozo, as do many others, the least you can do is send a few letters along.

      • Dawnelle

        nah I’m not gonna make them really hate HILLARY

        you see I did that many times already and I am getting “STOP SENDING ME EMAILS” from most of them so I am NOT Going to make it worse for HILLARY

        If they are THAT STUBBORN or bought off by now becoming a pest or pill or pain in someone’s ass constantly is not my thing (nor do I think Hillary would appreciate it)

        jmo

        I did it a half dozen times. They know my email. They won’t read it. Not from me. I don’t think that is being negative but realistic. Sorry.

        clearly we’re all not the same but still I support Sen. Clinton! And will never vote for a fraud and probably won’t vote for a war monger either.

        gnite

        • Mirlo

          who are you really???

          • heather

            Oh please, cut out the accusations. Comments like this make me feel like I”m back on dailykos where the inquisition never stopped.”

            • Dawnelle Leona del Puma

              Thanks Heather

              Yes that was a very tired and very sad ME right before bed last night!

              Today I feel a bit better but still believe those SUPERS and DELEGATES that accepted ANY kind of payment will feel obligated to vote for Bambi no MATTER WHAT otherwise have to give back the money that has already probably been spent!!!!

    • jrterrier

      I think the letter should be edited. The first sentence should read — As a resident of XYZ State, I hereby challenge the qualifications of Senator Barack Obama to have his name on the ballot.

      • no waffles aka drkate

        thank you, will do.

    • Obama is a bum

      I can’t figure out either party this year. I never thought the Republicans would nominate McCain. Many Republicans were angry and said they would vote for Obama because they did not like McCain and Obama would drop the ball if elected which would allow the Republicans to rebuild their party. I think many of the Republicans are having second thoughts since nobody really knew anything about Obama and what we have found out is frightening. I now think Republicans would prefer Clinton over Obama since Obama is a lunatic.

      I support this proposed effort here. There needs to be a full court press to stop Obama. Everyone with ideas to damage Obama need to step forward and implement them with support from as many others as possible. I believe Obama needs to be defeated and the DNC changed. I am an Independent but have no desire to see either party become a ceespool like the Democratic party is becoming. An Obama defeat would put the Democratic party back in business and the DNC would get overhauled.

      UNITED STATES FIGHTING AGAINST OBAMA!

    • http://www.hillaryloyalistnowformccain.com valsthewoman

      Hello,
      I live in Ohio. I sent the letter to my Sec. of State Jennifer Burnner. I look forward to posting a response. If everyone does this……
      i AM ALSO SENDING A COPY TO MY STATE NEWSPAPERS, NEWSTATIONS AND NATIONAL NEWS OUTLETS. GOOD LUCK EVERYONE!!!!!!!!!!

      • no waffles aka drkate

        thank you so much! This was the point of doing this! start the challenge, send it to the newspaper. Good luck, keep us apprised.

    • A. R.
  • http://ohmyvolvo.blogspot.com http://ohmyvolvo.blogspot.com

    Oh man, I’m not even voting for Obama but you lot are really insane. You’re dragging the party back to it’s days as the party of slavery.. you’re racist.

    • StrawberrybitesBarky

      And you have shitty taste in cars.

      • HARP

        We have a new Troll from Repug land.

        • Zeke

          Do Rep’s even drive Volvo’s? I’d think they’d go Navigator or something. Nah, this troll is from the same cesspool as the rest. Give away: “You lot”
          How often do “You Lot” get called “You Lot?”

          Try this one troll: Sod off

          • ritamary

            How about this: Sod off you wanker.

        • Rob in Chicago

          Even the Bot’s name on his website: Spewey” is appropriate. I just wish he would go somewhere else to spew. I’m sorry that I gave his site a “click”, and I take the click back ? Actually, he probably spewed here just to get more clicks to his site. Pathetic; him and his damned noisy ass Volvo.

    • HARP

      And you are an idiot. Whats your point.

    • athena

      Rascist? – Shut up you bot! The rulz are the rulz……..and BO seems to be trying to get around the ones that really matter.

    • No for O

      R u off ur meds? You cannot be serious.

    • Karma

      You’ve got Hillary dressed up like Hilter…complete with a mustache…and we are insane!? LOL

      And Strawberry is right you have horrible taste in cars.

      Is your’s the slow boxy version or the slow boxy version with rounded corners? LOL

      • Zeke

        Acronym for VOLVO: Very Odd Looking Vehicular Object

        • Karma

          LOL!!

    • Seattle Moss

      Unless Hillary is the nominee we have left the party asshole!
      If the democrats selects Obama then they will be headed for extinction after November.
      I’m sick of Volvo drivers.

      The seats in Volvos are designed to make people prissy and anti-American.
      Volvos in Seattle are like a plague onto society.

      As a proud American manufacturer I’m glad I can say that I bought an American car.
      My 300 rocks!

      • Karma

        Hemi ;)

        • Seattle Moss

          I wouldn’t have anything else!

    • kgirl1028

      I clicked on you cute little site, If you think Hillary is a nazi check out barak and his national civilian security serivice, or as michelle says ‘barak will make you work” foolishness. And you can’t call me racist cause i’m black.

      • Thinker

        same here.

        lol @ the Obamabot race-baiters who keep calling us racist, ASSUMING that all of the posters on here against Obama are White.

        hmmm, so since you and I are Black, their little racist tactic won’t work.

        Get ready kgirl, the trolls are going to start calling us “uncle Toms” or tell us to “wakeup” the same way Meshelle did.

        Maybe their actions are a part of their “national civilian security serivice” training ?? I think this might be a part of the Obama Troll 101 class.

        • Obama is a bum

          Since Obama has nothing to offer the Obama campaign has always felt their ace-in-the-hole was the racist card. They feel the racist card is their kryptonite but if people don’t fold under it then they are done.

          Blacks have been told to fall in line for a long time otherwise they are Uncle Tom or sell outs, thus robbing them of any diversification of thought. They pull the racist name calling on whites in the same approach to get them to fall in line instead of thinking.

          UNITED STATES FIGHTING AGAINST OBAMA!

        • C.S.

          And all Obama disciples (and Obama) seem to forget there are more minorities in this country than just their little group.

          Hispanics who, by the way, came along with the annexed western territories, are the largest group of “minorities” in the U.S.

          Now that Native American numbers are growing rather than being diminished they are becoming another “minority” to be reckoned with.

          And don’t forget the Asian population (from China, Japan, Korea and now Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees from our last long war) that have been here for about as long as Obama’ white relatives and many of them arrived as slaves, too.

          All of these and others (don’t forget the ladies) have as much right to claim racism as the Obama pack does. So why does this privileged half white guy from Indonesia/Hawaii think he is the only one entitled to throw that epithet around when his African American connection started and ended in Kenya – not the USA.

    • http://barbarany_9.blogspot.com Barbara

      Oh another troll forgetting that not only is NoBama 1/2 white…

      he’s a liar.

      buh-bye and take that volvo with you

    • sfhillary

      Correct. I’ve tried to avoid reaching this conclusion but yes, they are crazy, and I cannot think of any reason for the virulence of their hatred other than race. Oh well. Luckily their influence is declining Check this out:

      http://www.rumproast.com/index.php/site/comments/the_truth_about_puma_conference_08_you_cant_spell_conference_without_c_o_n/

      LOL.

      • Seattle Moss

        Where have you been sf?
        Seems that when Obama is sinking in the polls you go hide under a rock.
        Nothing has changed!

        Obama is anti-American and the proof is how he wished for defeat in Iraq.

        I ask you once again sf…

        How can I support a nominee for president who doesn’t cheer our troops?

        • Pink Panther

          Using race is an easy out for Obama supporters because they cannot defend his racist and sexist behavior.

          Remember, it is Obama who is racist and sexist.

          Obama attended a racist church for 20 years which preached based on Black Liberation Theology.

          Obama got married in that church and had his children attend and baptized in that church.

          Obama wrote in his autobiography, Dreams of My Father: A Story of Race & Inheritance, “That’s just how white folks will do you.”

          Obama referred to his grandmother as a “typical white person.”

          Obama associated with Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Bill Ayers, Faher Michael Pflger and Rashid Khalidi.

          Castro, Gaddafi, Kim Jong, Hamas and Hugo Chavez have all voiced support for Obama.

          Obama states he believes in equal pay but pays the women working in his Senate office less than the men working on his staff, according to a Report of the Secretary of the Senate.

          If Obama supporters admit these things about him, they have to admit they are the ones who are racist and sexists.

          They are not going to do that so instead, when rational people ask reasonable questions about their candidate, the only thing they can say is: “You are a racist.”

          Remember: They know not what they are talking about.

      • Obama is a bum

        Go back over to Kos and sing kumbaya with the rest of your dead heads or are you getting tired of the cult.

      • heather

        Actually, depending on whom you consider to be “they”, it looks to me like the PUMA nfluence is increasing. PUMA spokespeople are appearing on the MSM and Hillary’s name will be put in nomination (and by her own campaign’s declaration it was not their idea but PUMAs).

    • ritamary

      Just questioning anything about Dear Leader makes us racists. How dare we ask questions about Dear Leader! Well as another Obot said on a different thread, the roolz will be different when Obummer is president.

      • sfhillary

        No, questioning anyone doesn’t make you racist. Your seething, deranged, irrational hatred of a black man and the steady stream of racially-motivated commentary are what make at least some of you racist. For instance: I’ve read hundreds of times on NQ that Obama espouses “Black Liberation Theology.” The day anyone is able to demonstrate to me that this man has any personal belief whatsoever in Black Liberation Theology, I’ll eat my shoe.

        But of course this is all straight out of the Republican playbook: attack your opponent with whatever the most potent negative weapon is, then when you’re called on it, simply deny it, over and over again, no matter how much evidence there is.

        So sure, you have members who comment about black liberation theology, and make constant Ludacris comments, and call Michelle Obama “beast” or “ape,” or make jokes about malt liquor in the White House, and on and on. But none of you are racist. Sure.

        http://www.rumproast.com/index.php/site/comments/the_truth_about_puma_conference_08_you_cant_spell_conference_without_c_o_n/

        Read it and weep, PUMAs. Your “movement” is a joke. When push came to shove, you couldn’t get more than sixty people to come to your convention.

        How sad.

        • Seattle Moss

          How unfortunate for you sf…

          Enjoy that bitter backlash!

        • andySF

          By using the race card, you are not better than Obama camp. He lost me at his race baiting and you are no better. There are always race factor in this country, and by using race as your reason of support make you a very racist person. It means you don’t think us minorities are capable of doing anything on our own merit.

          If you want discussion or debate issue, stop your race baiting!

        • Hope Floats

          Correction. My seething deranged irrational hatred of a quarter maybe half-black man who can provide no compelling reason to vote for him except that he ran with the jackass party instead of the GOP.

        • kgirl1028

          No what’s sad is that in this Country, there are only sixty people who question the ligimacy of people like Barak Obama and George W Bush. Now that is pathetic and sad. Trust me, people’s blind trust of obama is no different than their trust of Bush. When two people who are grossly incompatent liars, earn that much trust and loyalty, you know the world is going to hell in a hand basket. Why has obama lied to you about his identity? why didn’t his supposed call for a cease fire get the russians to stop work? Wake up there are no Russian and Georgians standing together Kumby yah and they want be doing it anytime soon. Infact Obama is doing the same thing Bush use to do when we were in danger, go on vacation. The rest of the world wants obama as president for one simple reason, he’s arrogent, he’s weak, and he doesn’t work well under pressure. What you don’t see the way he acts when someone asks him something he’s not ready for uhh ahhh uhh ahhh uhhh. Trust me we’ll be lucky if all he does if we are attacked he read “my pet goat”, at least bush had Chaney and Rumsfeld, but Barry has Winnie the Pooh. Now think sfhillary who looks crazy? People who want someone competent or you someone who votes for someone who thinks a disney character should frame our foriegn policy?

        • Obama is a bum

          “The day anyone is able to demonstrate to me that this man has any personal belief whatsoever in Black Liberation Theology, I’ll eat my shoe.”

          You are not talking to zombies in Obamaland over at Kos. Your messiah spent more time searching for a church to go to than he did working in the Senate. And the bigot only sat there for 20 years sopping up Wright’s toxic black liberation theology. Obama is not the sharpest knife in the drawer but over 20 years even he had to learn a lot about BLT. I imagine he does not know much else. Now go choke on your shoe.

          UNITED STATES FIGHTING OBAMA!

        • heather

          Wow I think you hoisted yourself on your own petard with this one:
          “The day anyone is able to demonstrate to me that this man has any personal belief whatsoever in Black Liberation Theology, I’ll eat my shoe.”

          Hope you’ve got some salt to go with that. Barack Obama called Rev. Wright his mentor and spiritual leader. Barack Obama secured federal funds for Wright’s various projects. Barack Obama sat in Wright’s church listening to him spew hatred. Rev. Wright has stated many times, and most clearly, that he is a believer and proponent of BLT. He goes so far as to chastise interviewers who ask him questions that (he implies) would not be necessary if the person had a grain of understanding of BLT.

          In the universe most of us inhabit (I can’t speak for you), these facts constitute “demonstration” of a “personal belief” in BLT.

        • no waffles aka drkate

          yawn. some people just don’t get it. troll-dom is like boredom. nothing to see here, move along….

        • cathnealon

          shil
          20 years in a black liberation theologian’s church; baptized, married, and his children baptized
          20 years personal friend to wannabe black liberation Catholic priest theologian Fr. Pfleger
          I guess he was just lying to them trying to get elected–
          racist, racist, racist–roe v. wade, roe v wade, repeat repeat repeat that’s a joke
          Hey, remember when the crowd had a choice between Jesus and Barabbas and they said “Give us Barabbas’ the thief and liar well, that’s what BO’s supporters are saying, “we don’t want democracy, we want the leftist, anti-American, white hating One and his wife, ‘Give us the Obamas”

    • Obama is a bum

      You’re probably too young to vote and I will assume you are a racist unless you present me with a certificate signed by Filthy Phleger indicating that you are not racist — in that case you may be classified as a lunatic.

      • Pink Panther

        You are correct; Obama is a bum and a racist and a sexist.

    • Pink Panther

      Obama attended a racist church for 20 years which preached based on Black Liberation Theology.

      Obama got married in that church and had his children attend and baptized in that church.

      Obama wrote in his autobiography, Dreams of My Father: A Story of Race & Inheritance, “That’s just how white folks will do you.”

      Obama referred to his grandmother as a “typical white person.”

      Obama associated with Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Bill Ayers, Faher Michael Pflger and Rashid Khalidi.

      Castro, Gaddafi, Kim Jong, Hamas and Hugo Chavez have all voiced support for Obama.

      Obama states he believes in equal pay but pays the women working in his Senate office less than the men working on his staff, according to a Report of the Secretary of the Senate.

      Obama and the new Democratic Party are racist, sexist and a party of hate.

    • Roonie in PA

      If you ever had another thought, besides calling us racists, maybe people would take you a little more seriously.
      We are practicing active democracy. Maybe you just haven’t SEEN IT before.
      FDR & John Kennedy were nominated from the floor of the democratic convention. Maybe you’re not old enough either to know your country’s history.
      I think you are a racist. have A GDNITE

      • Hope Floats

        No one here would ever take sfhillary / ted / debbie / believe seriously.

        • Obama is a bum

          They are nothing but Communists for Obama.

    • Hillztheone

      After being called a “typical white person” by Senator Obama….I’m racist??? Sounds like to me you had a fight with the wife and needed to blow off some steam. Or maybe your Volvo did not start today….take your meds, get some rest…and don’t bother calling us in the morning. Racist is as racist does.

    • Ai1een

      Ohmyvolvo – Nothing written here is even remotely RACIST and yet, just because we oppose Obama…your tired accusation gets thrown out there based upon…absolutely nothing. You don’t support Hillary, – therefore, based upon your logic – YOU MUST BE A SEXIST PIG.

  • http://www.actblue.com/page/usa NOBAMA

    DO IT NOW.

    If Obama is disqualified now Hillary can save the Democratic Party. She is a shoe-in to win, unlike Obama.

    If you don’t act now the GOP will do it for you. It will be too late for Hillary to save us and McCain will be president.

    Either way Obama is out. At the very least we know he is involved in forgery and he is a liar.

  • artsykr

    This goes to “Content of Character” nicely done…and thanks for all of the hard work….

    • Pink Panther

      “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” (emphasis added.)

      Martin Luther King, Jr.

  • Hillcrat

    Does anyone know what name Barry Oblahma/Soetoro used on his marriage certificate??

    Would that make Michelle “I hate America” Oblahma/Soetoro not legally married to Barry??

    I have to say I don’t trust the DNC and the media stating Hillary’s name will be in nomination…I don’t think I could EVER trust the DNC again…Never! Will be keeping my guard up…

    PUMA!

    • Mirlo

      check out Heidi Li’s blog on this, she doesn’t trust them either

    • heather

      Unfortunately, I trust them entirely to put her name in nomination. Because, the fix is in and she’ll get very few votes. Then they’ll be able to claim — with a lot more legitimacy than they could otherwise — that she “lost fair and square, now shut up and sit down PUMAs.” It will make us all look bad, but I still won’t be able to get behind Obama.

      This strikes me as one deep philosophical difference that divides the PUMA movement. Many of us just wanted Hillary to get the respect she deserved and will/may be ready to support the party once that is achieved. Others of us (and I count myself as one) cannot support Obama under any circumstances.

  • TeakwoodKite

    Certified mail ASAP.

  • Ellen D

    I trust the California Secretary of State, Debra Bowen. If I can squeeze this in on my lunch hour I’ll do it and mail it off.

    • Marie

      Ellen D
      I already called the elections division within Debra Bowen’s organization and they said there is nothing they can do before he applies to be on the ballot in California. But maybe Debra herself will know what to do.

    • TeakwoodKite

      I trust her to a point, Ellen D. The Secretary of State did a great job in getting those Electronic machines dumped. But I would also recommend that the same letter be sent to the State Attorney General as well.

      “although I am a life-long registered democrat”…

      Might I suggest that party affiliation not be included and taking a “citizen of the State of _____” approach would compliment the Constitutional aspects of the proffer.

      Asking for public certification of any findings writing to get them on record would be appropriate.

      Thanks Dr. Kate!

      • TeakwoodKite

        …IN writing..

        • Pink Panther

          Remember the Office of Attorney General is held by Jerry Brown, who is running for Governor. He is a Democrat but will probably run on law and order issues as well as environmental issues (e.g., global warming).

        • no waffles aka drkate

          thank you very much for suggestions, will do. thanks for helping with this effort! I am desperate to get this information out!

      • no waffles aka drkate

        thank you!

    • heather

      Me too! That will probably make exactly two of us in CA sending these letters. :) But heck at least WE will feel we did what we could.

      BTW whose congressional district are you in? I’m in Anna Eshoo’s and I’ve loved her for a long time, but she came out early for Obama even though Hillary actually took this district, so I’m a bit torn.

  • Treading Water

    Let’s Play a Game: Who Am I?

    I was born in the US in the early 60’s

    I am a Leo

    Some of my grandparents were not US citizens

    One of my parents is a dual citizen

    I graduated a private college-prep HS in Hawaii

    I was a basketball star

    In my teens I went overseas

    I have done community work

    I went to two different undergraduate Colleges

    I studied Law

    I started my career in the lower 48/mainland US

    I am personable and can adapt to most situations

    People look to me for answers

    This is my bio from birth to early 30’s

    Who Am I?

    ……. with only this information will you vote for me for POTUS?

    • Barry Soetoro, Is That You?

      Barry Soetoro, Is that You?

      I vote based on the content of people’s character. Therefore, you will not get my vote.

      • roseeriter

        Barry was a basketball star??? wow now I’ll vote for him..i luv stars!!!!

        NOBAMA!

        • Obama is a bum

          I know he was not a bowling star with a score of 37. But Obama likes residing in the gutter that is why he moved to Chicago and befriended the gutter crowd of Wright, Ayers, Meeks, and Phleger. Can’t find a more pathetic crowd than that.

    • andySF

      Of course not. That’s like half of the adult in this country, not everyone of them qualify to be president.

      • Treading Water

        I could be Barry Soetoro/Obama with this bio but in no way does this qualify to be POYUS-
        ——————————
        So why is it that Barry/Barack Obama/Soetoro thinks he qualifies? Would you trust your family”s lives with him???

        • andySF

          When did you ever see me voice support for that fraud?

    • Steve1

      Can I ask a question? Do you like riding Limos with complete strangers on the streets of Chicago and smoking on a little glass pipe with some type of substance in it?

    • http://dontcallmesweetie.blogspot.com/ Blu

      One of my parents is a dual citizen

      It’s my understanding that his mother was a US citizen and his father was Kenyan. Which parent is a dual citizen? Did his father get US citizenship?

      • no waffles aka drkate

        mother may have had Indonesian citizenship when she married Soetoro.

  • Hank

    We should try sending the information to Dan Rather, maybe he can investigate what he probably already knows.

  • elise

    Dr. Kate, I sent two emails today. The first was to the President of the IL. State Bar Association and the second to Hillary. In the first letter, I asked for a contact in the Ethics Committee and ask them about documents showing Obama may have used a different name at sometime in his life and how he answered the question in his application to the Bar.

    I wanted to write Hillary to tell her what I was doing and as an individual, not as the member of any group. I am sure I have read everything posted here about the questions you raised and some several times. I was skeptical in the beginning and there are still some things I would like to see independent experts take a look at, but I am convinced there is something wrong. If the two documents posted yesterday by TD are the real thing (the school registration and his Bar appl.), he should not only drop out of the race, but be disbarred and tried in court for his lie. When he put his signature at the bottom of the application, he had to swear the information was accurate and I believe it is a federal offense to give false statement. I don’t want to do this. Send emails everyday, look up addresses and trying to think of a way to gain the attention of one single individual willing to examine the evidence. It’s discouraging, but I won’t stop and hope others here will continue. The biggest con in history is about to be played on the American people and we all have a stake in the TRUTH. I am truly sorry if it hurts Hillary politically. But I believe she will survive and don’t think anything will hurt Bill Clinton’s legacy. It is history and he will be judged on what he accomplished between the years 1994-2000 and I think he will be considered the best only behind FDR. IMO it has been about Hillary all along. Her work on the Watergate legal counsel created enemies in the Republican Party. Do you know what I mean. She was, I believe, twenty eight years old then and already formidable. I can imagine the Republicans thought they were rid of her when Nixon resigned, but twenty years later, there she was again, this time moving into the White House and with an office in the West Wing no less. A few months later and her husband put her in charge of passing a universal health care plan. God, they have hated her for so many years, but she just ran for senate, was elected and there she was again. And she had the AUDACITY to believe she could be PRESIDENT. But, this time it is Democrats repeating the Repub lies. Pelosi, Dean, Brazil and Obama are so inferior to her. That’s the end of my rant, but I hope others don’t give up.

    • Thinker

      Hi Elise! I always make sure that I read your posts.

      I agree with everything you said.

      And I’m not giving up either!

      • elise

        Thank you. I’m blushing.

    • no waffles aka drkate

      Thank you Elise. I agree with you 100% and like how you took action.

      I can hardly believe it that this year I am worried about the DEMS stealing the election and putting up a fraud.

      I am convinced the powers that be know and knew this, but they never expected DEMS to come up with the information this soon. Look at how late this letter is already!!! Bless TD and her researchers for working so hard.

      Obama should take himself out of the running.

  • LuigiDaMan

    Good luck, folks. I really do hope you pull it off. I doubt that any of this will make a diiference, that BO will still be the nominee, but thanks for keeping the faith and trying.

  • sfhillary
    • sfhillary

      Seriously, guys. I expected not to get much response to this article, but regardless, the jig is up. When you gather online it’s easy to pretend to each other that you’re a powerful, growing movement. But when you have a real convention in public, the stakes are higher because you cannot hide from the truth, and in this case, the truth is, you had your big national PUMA conference and had around sixty attendees.

      SIXTY! Ha! I got such a thrill from reading this guy’s article, and seeing confirmed what I have long suspected (and said out loud here): that you people are a fringe group with no electoral relevance.

      Seriously. Sixty people? That’s really embarrassing. If you’d been able to scare up a thousand or so, that would have been something. But sixty? That’s cult territory, people.

      I’m truly delighted to see how small and irrelevant you all really are.

      • PKJayne

        I would say 60 people is a pretty good turnout for a newly started group.

        While many of us work and can not get away for these things there are many of us working effortlessly via phone or email. If we were such an insignificant lot as you Barry koolaide drinkers like to imagine you wouldn’t be bothered with us.

        Fact is there are many in the Dem party who know Barry is a complete fraud and won’t vote for him.

        I’ll be listening for you to cry the loudest come Nov 5th SF…….You wanks have no idea what is coming.

        P.U.M.A.

        • Andrew

          I haven’t seen a single set of polls anywhere that put Obama at less than 280 Electoral votes,a nd most put him north of 300; nor has any set of ten-day averages ever shown Obama drop below a 4-point lead.

          What convinces you that the P.U.M.A. movement will be electorally significant, yet has been completely invisible in effect on tracking polls since its inception?

          • HARP

            According to the latest Fox News survey, Obama is winning among women under 40 by 13 points, but McCain is winning among women aged 41-45 by four points. Among women 50 and over, McCain is three points ahead. Obama’s 48-35 lead among women under 40 is normal for a Democrat, but to trail among women in their 40s by 45-41 and by women over 50 by 38-35 is extraordinary. The problem is that older women don’t like Obama as much as younger women do. While 70 percent of women under 40 have a favorable opinion of the Democratic candidate, only 58 percent of women in their 40s feel the same way, and only 52 percent of those over 50 see him favorably. For a Democrat to be losing among women over 40 is without precedent in the past 20 years.

          • HARP

            Oh Andrew, your little playmates are getting plenty worried. I wonder how only 60 people could do this. PUMAS must have one hell of a bite huh.

            Is the Presidency slipping away from us again? Add to Hotlist

            by enthusiast, Thu Aug 14, 2008 at 11:55:29 PM EST

            Sorry to say it, but the polling data are not encouraging. Recent polls have been trending McCain for the past weeks. Time is starting to run out – we’re less than 3 months away, and Obama’s lead in the polls has been diminishing. Now, we learn CO has polled McCain for the first time, and the projections have dipped below 270 for Obama.

            Obama’s on vacation, and the stupid conversation is about Hillary’s nomination. Rachel Maddow nailed it – McCain went negative and made the conversation about Obama, and his team didn’t fight back effectively, so the whole conversation is still about Obama, and his numbers have been dropping steadily.

            I don’t see anything that’s going to turn things around. Obama will get a small bump from the convention, which will be reversed by the Repuke convention.

            There isn’t a VP who can really help Obama win in November. None of the choices are very exciting. Hillary’s not going to be the VP, even though she would probably be able to help him the most.

            I’m pessimistic. I don’t think the campaign has gone well for us since June. The trip to Europe didn’t give us a big bump. Obama’s numbers are flat, and they are falling.

            Somebody, give me something to be hopeful about…

            What is going to turn this campaign around? The VP? The convention? Actually, the convention sounds like a downer, like a stupid popularity and pissing contest. The Hillary supporters are acting like jerks, as far as I can tell, like little spoiled brats who don’t give a damn about anything but their bruised egos.

            • HARP

              AND THIS RESPONSE BY ANOTHER OF YOUR FREAKISH FRIENDS.

              Well, there’s Nancy Pelosi who months ago opened her big botoxed mouth and declared that the “dream ticket” would be a bad idea–as if anyone should give a shit about her opinion, then there’s the gang at good old MSNBC like Maddow, Robinson, Alter, Capehart, who when they’re not smirking whenever Hillary’s name comes up in the veep discussions favor us with Cliche 101 speeches about her going against Obama’s “change” message–you see he’s the media declared “change” candidate. Which I suppose means that HRC is a carbon copy of George Bush. Then there’s another member of the chattering class, Jack Cafferty, who recently referred to Bill Clinton as “spoiled” among other names that drunk called him. How’s that. Not one of these people mentioned the Rasmussen poll which came out in July showing HRC beating McCain by 8 points while Obama only tied him. But then I guess when a prospective running mate does better than the nominee, the opponents of that running mate don’t want the public to know about it.

              by handsomegent on F

              • HARP

                Andrew, should I keep going or have you ran to mommy to tell her its not fair. Just wait until Nov 4 you little shit. PUMA is going to unleash the gates of hell on your Damn socialists asses.

                • Andrew

                  I would go on, if I were you, HARP. Because the poll you cited shows that a majority of women in all age brackets have a favorable opinion of Obama. How is that a bad thing? How is that showing that Obama is in trouble.

                  You can’t say “only” 52% of of older women view him favorably; that means tht even in his *worst* bracket, more older women like him than dislike him.

                  I’m not at all sure how noting that in every age bracket, Obama has a 50%+ favorable rating is bad news. Yes, a four-point trail is objectively bad, but the day I’ll take a single Fox News poll over a ten-day tracking average from composite poll sources is… well, never, actually.

                  Obama holds a steady 4-point minimum national lead and electoral projections have put him at 300 +/- 20 EVs for weeks. A single poll doesn’t change that. I have full confidence we will be watching President Obama be sworn in.

                  • Hope Floats

                    Favorability is not electability. People like Obama. They just don’t trust him to lead the country.

                    • Perry Logan

                      Obama is even losing the youth vote. Bye-bye Obama!

                      A recent ABC News/Washington Post survey reveals the first nugget of alarming news for Team Obama. As Obamania reached its frenzied pinnacle in March, fully 66 percent of voters 18-29 told pollsters they were “certain” to cast ballots in November. By late July, that figure dropped by a whopping 20 percentage points, with less than half of the youth vote still vowing to go to the polls this fall.

                      A freshly minted Zogby poll that grabbed headlines by highlighting a dramatic McCain comeback in the overall data also features a fascinating youth vote tidbit: “McCain gained 20% and Obama lost 16% among voters ages 18-29. Obama still leads that group, 49%-38%.

                      http://media.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDk5Y2QxMmI4NmNiYmI0MjkxZjY2YTQ3N2MzYWQ4NmU=

                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCRLBJfVXIQ

                  • Buzz Latte

                    4% by some measures is only statistically significant by a percentage point. In other words, it’s really INSIGNIFICANT.

            • Ai1een

              LOL HILARIOUS! I loved reading that report by “enthusiast” Our “bruised egos” in the real world equate to LOYAL AMERICANS WITH A CONSCIENCE WHO HONOR the U.S. CONSTITUTION AND RULES AND BYLAWS…UNLIKE THE DNC.

            • elise

              Harp, there is another poll showing the Democratic candidate for senate, Mark Udall, is tied with the Republican. Udall was ahead in the polls by a wide margin two weeks ago. After reading the story about the Boulder Clinton delegate, Millstone, I email the Chairwoman of the Party here in Co. I told her I had been planning to vote down ticket Dems even though I was unable to vote for Obama. They lost another vote here for Udall.
              Here is her response:

              “One of the burdens of chairing the party is that I cannot publicly go outand defend myself, the party rules or even tell what really is going on.I took that on with the responsibility of being a leader.”

              Do you get the same impression I did? There is trouble in River City?

          • http://insightanalytical.wordpress.com Gloria

            Andrew…see this site for electoral vote tallies….with Obama at 275

            http://www.electoral-vote.com/

        • Amy

          You got that right PKJayne.

          Obamaboiy there forgets its summer, there’s a recession and the internet has connected thousands of pro-Hillary people — so 60 at a conference is a good start. 60 that could go… we have 18 million ready for a Barry ass whooping come Nov.

          Did you all hear the Obamabot’s collective diaper being filled simultaneously when it was announced that Hillary will be put in for nomination?

          • no waffles aka drkate

            actually, I think I smelled it!

      • cdo

        glad its keeping you amused…wonder if you will still be laughing in November.
        Polls aren’t looking to good right now for you, sorry to say.
        Obama’s lead fell from 12 to 4 in Minnesota, and McCain took the lead in Colorado in polls from this afternoon.
        That leaves Obama with leads in the Kerry states, Iowa, and New Mexico- 264 EV. Not enough.

        Hmmm, the slide continues…I wonder who all those people McCain is picking up could possibly be? There’s only sixty PUMAs so maybe you should start trolling other sites dude, nothing to see here.

      • HARP

        You must fall in this category.

        What luck for rulers that men do not think.

        Adolf Hitler

      • Obama is a bum

        Seriously asshole, you have nothing worthwhile to say. All of you Obamapukes are alike.

      • standard

        Then why are taking significant time to
        write such a lengthy post.

        Something makin’ ya sweat?

    • C.S.

      The truth may hurt sometimes, but the Truth will also set you FREE. Try it sometime, you might get to like it.

  • Pink Panther

    Off Topic:FEC Rejects Democrats’ Claim Against McCain

    McCain won a round against Democrats yesterday when the Federal Election Commission rejected their contention that he violated campaign finance laws during the Republican primary.

    • Hope Floats

      HAHAHA. They can shut their pie holes about McCain Feingold now.

  • jbjd

    I already told you, in relation to the general election, the issue of BO’s eligibility for POTUS is not ripe until BO – assuming he is the nominee – files the papers to get on the general election ballot in each state, which happens after the convention. Some states require ballot submissions within 24 hours after the nominating convention; most allow more time. But challenges must be filed shortly – sometimes, within 3 days – after that. So, if you think BO will be nominated but, you do not think he is eligible for POTUS, you had better begin setting up your spread sheets now, with state general election ballot filing deadlines; challenge deadlines; and process for filing a challenge. Also, look up what is the burden of proof in each state. For example, in NC, the burden of proof is on the ‘candidate’ undergoing the challenge to prove he is eligible.

    Stop talking and get to work.

  • jo

    WOW….these emails are so party unity!!! Cant wait for our upcoming party where we can celebrate together since we are just so united ( not).

    The way our party has attacked each other for free speech is so pathetic.

  • JohnT

    BREAKING NEWS – IMMEDIATE ACTION: Send your letter to your state secretary and Attorney General of Hawaii to challenge Obama-Soetoro’s technical qualifications–legal name, birth certificate. Only 9 days away from the Convention; every second is vital for us now to remove Mr Barry HUSSEIN from the nomination.

    Do not listen to Bot trolls and Rep trolls.

    Act NOW!

    • http://dianej.wordpress.com DianeJ

      Letter Sent.

  • Mary

    Did any one check out the Michigan election laws? I thought it strange at the time that Barry didn’t even have his name (which name?) on the ballot. He may choose not to spend any money/time campaigning there, but not to have your name on the ballot? Surely 10 votes is better than none. So, why not put it on the ballot? Perhaps Michigan required a certified copy of birth, which the Obots couldn’t produce, or didn’t want to while the primary was still in play…. any one from Michigan out there that knows the state requirements for having your name appear on a ballot?

  • Joy

    I don’t think letter writing will do it. Legal action seems to be the way to go. With as many posters on the blog some of you must be lawyers or know a lawyer. So why not sue the Beautiful O and force him to show his birth certificate like the guy did to McCain? .

    As many of you as there are, you can all chip in to pay the filing fee. If you do it before the DNC and the Beautiful O is not a US citizen then Hillary is in like Flin. Let Larry head it up.

  • Thinker

    Hello everyone,

    I’m here in Ohio and there are a lot of us that don’t like Obama. I will do my part to send another email containing all of this information and I will encourage other Ohio folks to do the same.

    Hillary fought for us & now it’s time to fight for her.

  • lowdowndog

    Re: Eligibility of Senator Barack Obama (short version)

    Dear Secretary____________,

    I have recently acquired irrefutable information about Senator Barack Obama’s background that jeopardizes his eligibility to be on (your state’s) ballot in the General Election. I am writing editorials to alert the public to this situation. As more citizens of (state) become aware of this information, I am sure your office will endeavor to do everything possible to assure the public that you have corrected any deficiencies in his eligibility under Article II of the U.S. Constitution to be placed on the Presidential ballot in the State of Iowa.

    I understand that the Secretary of State’s office relies primarily on the state and national Republican and Democratic parties to certify a nominee’s eligibility, although your office retains the final authority on eligibility along with other SOS offices. Unfortunately, it appears in the case of Senator Obama, the Democratic Party has not conducted a full verification of his eligibility.

    The birth certificate (BC) Barack Obama shows on his website asserts his legal name is Barack Hussein Obama II. http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

    Evidence now indicates that his actual valid BC on file in Hawaii says his legal name is Barry Soetoro. Republicans have this document http://tinyurl.com/63ph5e and they will likely use it after the convention to challenge his eligibility to be POTUS. His original BC, presumably in the name Barack Hussein Obama II, was sealed when his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, adopted him.

    It appears he has presented a fake BC because he wants to conceal his Indonesian identity, Muslim background and avoid observing Article II of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits dual-citizenship for POTUS.

    Barry Soetoro started using the name “Obama” sometime in the 70’s but researchers have been unable to locate the public record showing that Barry Soetoro legally changed his name back to Barack Obama. He might have used his original BC (the one that was sealed when he was adopted) with the name “Obama” as an identity document over the years. However, no one has been able to determine that the name “Obama” is his official legal name. If he used “Obama” to sign his candidacy papers for President and it is not his legal name, it could pose a serious problem for his candidacy, and stand in violation of several election-related laws.

    I have written Hawaii’s Lieutenant Governor James R. Aiona Jr: 808 586-0255 Fax: 808 586-0231 and emailed ltgov@hawaii.gov asking, “Is Barack Obama’s legal name Barack Obama, or Barry Soetoro?” I suggest that your office verify this information as soon as possible, and before the national convention. If you wait until after the convention, you can be sure the Republicans will challenge his name on every ballot in every state. Please, do your part to prevent such a horrific embarrassment to our county.

    Sincerely,

    Source of Information:
    http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/
    1. Barack Obama had Indonesian citizenship
    2. Barack Obama had the legal name Barry Soetoro
    3. Barack Obama was a Muslim, despite his “fight the smears” claim that he never has been. (see new story that we just posted on this topic).

    • no waffles aka drkate

      Excellent, good work

  • JohnT

    I don’t think letter writing will do it. Legal action seems to be the way to go. With as many posters on the blog some of you must be lawyers or know a lawyer. So why not sue the Beautiful O and force him to show his birth certificate like the guy did to McCain?
    ——————

    It takes a while to go through the Court process. The Urgent action now is to remove Mr HUSSEIN from the Nomination before the Convention.

    ACT NOW!

  • AnninCA

    He’s eligible. He’s legal. This is nutty stuff.

    • Hope Floats

      AnninCA, you said you were done posting here.

    • C.S.

      AnniCA,

      “You can fool some of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

      Got proof? Post it.

    • no waffles aka drkate

      show your proof, fool. otherwise you have nothing.

    • elise

      Ann in Ca. While some of the theories here may lack documentation and be eliminated in a legal challenge, others have validity. As for myself, I am concentrating on the application to the State Bar of IL and I believe it stand alone as something easily proven and sufficient to request an investigation from their ethics committee. I have, in fact, been in touch with someone there. Some voters in IL are also involved in questioning his legitimacy to be a member of the Bar. It doesn’t matter if he has not renewed his license to practice law there, which I understand is the case. The ultimate goal, for me, is to find a way to completely uncover all information before the convention and before the Republicans can destroy any chance of a Democratic victory in Nov. What I don’t understand are those in the Party who are unwilling to vett this candidate and a media never asking follow up questions in an effort to protect Obama. I have questioned your motives for a while now and have asked you several times what you want. I think I know, but I would like to read in your own words.

  • G

    I noticed that people continue referencing the ‘forensic analyses’ of the Birth Certificate.
    There’s a reason why Texas Darlin took down the ‘forensic reports’ posted on her blog – they’re fraudulent.

    In case anyone is interested, here are a few of the instances that I’ve noticed of apparent congruence in language between the ‘Techdude’ posting at the white supremacist/neo-nazi site Stormfront and the ‘Techdude’ sending reports to Texas Darlin.

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘I applaud you for questioning’
    Stormfront Techdude:
    ‘While I applaud Duke’s efforts’
    ‘I applaud the reporter’

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘straw man arguments’
    Stormfront Techdude:
    ‘constructing a straw man’

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘in homage to forensic firearm examinations’
    Stormfront Techdude:
    ‘paying homage to a 20 year old tennis player.’

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘just stop it man. Oh gosh…I just read your replies’
    SF Techdude:
    ‘(Gosh what a shocker!)’

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘I have no clue’
    Stormfront Techdude:
    ‘I honestly have no clue’

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘calling it low qaulity in itself is friggin hysterical’
    Stormfront Techdude:
    ‘the more I read stuff like this the more I think whites are friggin retards if’
    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘the demented retard who slaughtered’
    ‘are you married to Raytard?’

    Texas Darlin Techdude:
    ‘the fabulous world of the lazy online couch potatoes’
    Stormfront Techdude:
    ‘or are too lazy’ [he often comments that people are getting fat and unathletic]

    Stormfront Techdude: “Congrats to Henin on her win”
    TexasDarlin Techdude: “Congrats KG”

    Stormfront Techdude: “super secret government meetings”
    TexasDarlin Techdude: “super expensive specialized Photoshop filters”

    Stormfront Techdude: “heck I personally know quite a few”
    TexasDarlin Techdude: “Where the heck are they all hiding?”

    Stormfront Techdude: “I’m not 100% condoning it”
    TexasDarlin Techdude: “just to be 100% sure”

    Stormfront Techdude:
    “ONE stupid white guy”
    “incredibly stupid blacks”
    “comes along with some stupid theory”
    “One moment of gross stupidity”
    “stupid Italians”
    TexasDarlin Techdude:
    “I will simply put my money on them just being really stupid.”
    “one of the stupidest of the counter arguments”
    “can see just how stupid that argument actually is.”
    “ridiculously stupid and pathetic”
    “Everyone is free to just assume I dislike all stupid people”

    Stormfront Techdude: “There is nothing more annoying than”
    TexasDarlin Techdude: “just to annoy some people.”

    Stormfront Techdude:
    “hence my name.”
    “Hence more guests on that thread”
    TexasDarlin Techdude:
    “hence the reason I was personally asked”

    Stormfront Techdude:
    “this is the funniest thing you have EVER seen… and it is a real news clip of incredibly stupid blacks in America”
    “which is 100% the funniest typo of all time”
    TexasDarlin Techdude:
    “Let’s start with some of their funniest and lamest arguments.”

    I’ve also compared the ‘Techdude’ samples from TexasDarlin/Atlas and the ones from the white supremacist site Stormfront with an increasing set of other blog authors/forum posters. This has reinforced my impression of the (shared) uniqueness of the pattern of punctuation in the Techdude samples. Research in authorship identification has suggested that patterns of punctuation can be particularly informative in determining the author of a text.

    For the following set of nine punctuation marks
    .!?,;:-()
    I extracted all instances from a compilation of the TexasDarlin/Atlas ‘Techdude’ posts (for a total of 1019 punctuation characters) and from a compilation of the Stormfront ‘Techdude’ posts (for a total of 1198 punctuation characters). For the two ‘Techdudes’ the relative frequency of each type of punctuation character was very similar. I likewise extracted all instances of these punctuation characters from a set of 40 other blog authors/forum posters (using large samples of text in each case to generate sample size of >1000 punctuation characters) . None of the other authors showed relative frequencies of punctuation characters that resembled the two Techdude samples (they each looked strikingly different from the Techdude samples).

    I then used a Chi-squared test to determine whether different authors showed significant differentiation in use of punctuation characters (basically, a formal test of the hypothesis that two samples of text shared the same author versus were produced by different authors). The text from the two ‘Techdudes’ did not show significant differentiation from each other. But each of the ‘Techdude’ samples showed highly significant differentiation from all other authors I tested (p<0.01).

    Likewise, the two Techdudes seemed to show similarities in word usage when I generated lists of words by frequency of use (and compared these to other authors). They also show similarities in mean word length (at the low end, and outside the range of the other authors I’ve examined). There are quite a few other shared characteristics – they both like to use emoticons (e.g. yellow smileyfaces), they both like to use words written all in caps for emphasis (e.g. “so THAT would explain”, “NON-standard printers”, “does anyone STILL think”, “come up with ONE single”), they both use ’3rd party’ rather than the more common ‘third party’, etc.

    Also, the Stormfront ‘Techdude’ seems to favor the use of subterfuge. The following is from one of the Stormfront posts:
    Stormfront Techdude: ‘I think the best way to draw people to SF (as many do not even know what SF is) and not get banned is to pose as an extreme anti-racist. Act as if you’re offended by everything even remotely racially aware, and tell the person that “with your attitude you should be posting with the racists on stormfront.org’.

    Also, while many of the posters at Stormfront don’t favor involvement in electoral politics (they want to go off by themselves and do their own little neo-nazi thing), Stormfront ‘Techdude’ favors involvement in U.S. electoral politics (e.g. to spread stories about Obama).

    One additional comment. Techdude’s con should have been obvious from the very beginning. For example:

    Techdude at Atlas_Shrugs July 08, 2008
    ‘All will be revealed eventually – I am just wary of finding my brake lines cut and my bunny boiled in a pot of water’
    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/who-died-and-ma.html

    Techdude at Atlas_Shrugs July 20, 2008
    ‘As some of you may or may not know some asshat decided to track me down and vandalize my car and hang a dead mutilated rabbit from my front door in a lame attempt to intimidate me’
    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

    Then finally, Texas Darlin posted on August 10, 2008
    ‘Techdude has informed me that he is unable to continue his work at this time, due to family obligations and ongoing threats.’
    http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/techdude-update-and-who-i-am-not/

    • harvey

      okie dokie–now, can you produce a genuine valid birth certificate for precious?

    • elise

      G, I haven’t examined all your post here, but just one question, if you don’t mind?
      “I then used a Chi-squared test to determine whether different authors showed significant differentiation in use of punctuation characters” One thing strikes me as odd since I have rarely seen Chi-squared used outside of Physics applications, but be that as it may, using punctuation as the variable? Granted levels of education can change punctuation in any given sentence, if two samples are written by two different people with the same level why would that be a significant finding? The rules of grammar are more or less static and ” all the other authors I tested” may I ask how large your sample size was and what mechanism was used to separate the text from the punctuation? In most documents of reasonable length, the punctuation differential using Chi-squared would be insignificant enough as to be meaningless.

      I believe there is another statistician who posts here, Teakwoodkite, perhaps we might be able to have a third opinion? For me, this doesn’t pass the smell test. Manipulation of results is not uncommon unfortunately. Do you have a graph to back up your research?Teak, are you there?

      • G

        1. Chi-squared tests are used heavily in Medicine, Biology, Ecology, Education research, as well as linguistic analysis (i.e. not just in Physics). If you want to verify this, just Google it. It’s appropriate whenever you have a categorical variable, as in this case. Another alternative would be an extended (multi-category) version of the Fisher’s Exact test.

        2. Punctuation has been found to be an informative variable in authorship identification. That’s why I used it. If you want to look into Stylometry yourself, lots of papers are available for download by Googling. How useful a variable punctuation would be depends on the author, and how distinctive their punctuation pattern is. For example, someone who compulsively insists on using an exclamation point followed by a question mark after every single sentence would stand out as very distinctive. In this case, ‘Techdudes’ pattern of punctuation turns out to be quite unique.

        3. Patterns of punctuation vary dramatically for different individuals with the same level of education. Again, you can Google the scientific literature on this if you want to verify.

        4. You ask what sample size I used. I specified that in my post above. To generate this large a sample size for punctuation characters, I used all of the Texas Darlin and Atlas ‘Techdude’ posts (and a large set of the ‘Techdude’ comments on Stormfront). Comparable amounts of text were used for the other authors.

        5. You asked how I separated punctuation from other text. I used specialized software (two types of software, to verify that the counts were correct). If you wish to replicate, it’s possible to even do this in Microsoft Word, using the ‘Find and Replace’ function (which will give you a count of the number of characters replaced).

        6. The punctuation differential between Techdude and most other authors is pretty dramatic (I was surprised, since many other authors resembled each other to a greater degree). It’s obvious on simple visual inspection of a graph. I have no way of posting a graph here, but you can repeat the experiment yourself if you wish to verify what I’m saying (e.g. as I mentioned above, Microsoft Word can be used to get the punctuation counts, and you can generate graphs in Excel). However, make sure to use a large amount of text for each author (e.g. if you just grabbed two sentences, it wouldn’t give you an accurate representation).

        7. Also, as mentioned above, there were many similarities besides the use of punctuation. These included word usage frequencies, the use of specific expressions, etc., etc. In the Stylometry literature, all of this information is sometimes referred to as a ‘writeprint’.

        • elise

          G, sorry I’ve been off for a few hours and I apologize for not taking sufficient note of your sample size. TexasDarlin and Techdude have been criticized roundly on this blog for using deductive reasoning (If the axiom is correct, then the conclusion is…) This is a tried and true method to test theory. I just want to point out you are using the same method. That’s an observation not criticism of your method. I was in a hurry and, as I said, hadn’t had time to look at each part of your “proof” separately. It is interesting you note the Techdude differential is greater than normally found when compared to other authors. Would you like to speculate on why that may be true? Is it level of education or an indication of influence of a second language? I am aware Chi-squared has application in other areas, however it is most commonly used in physical sciences. Linguistics may be similar in some ways to physical science, but the variables can’t necessarily be counted on to yield equal results for the reasons I mentioned. And may I include the possibility of a strong second language reflected in word use and sentence structure, but not necessarily punctuation. Your research is admirable, but I doubt it could be used to prove with certainty your conclusion. They use of “smiley faces” and capital letters are a common way to express emotion on the Internet and extrapolating those into proof of authorship is a stretch. Not that is matters, but I’m not buying what you are trying to sell based on similarity of puntuation. One other comment, aside from your research, why have you so painstakeingly tried to prove the blogs may be from the same person rather than in building a case against the content? You have introduced an element irrelevant to the discussions about Obama’s elegibility to distract attention from the main issue.

          • G

            Elise,

            Sorry for not responding more quickly. I’ve been off doing other things for the last couple of days.
            I’m not saying that the two ‘Techdudes’ are definitively one and the same. But large samples of text are available, and there is a disturbing level of congruence (across multiple types of linguistic variables – including punctuation, word use frequency, use of idioms, etc.). Far more than you’d expect by chance. More sophisticated approaches (e.g. use of Support Vector Machine or Bayes Net) could be used to make a more definitive determination.

            I didn’t bother debunking the content of his arguments because others have done a thorough job of this elsewhere (including Neal Krawetz, Joseph Cannon, Koyaan, and others). One quick thing I will point out – KG commented that she used a different alignment (of the two overlaid birth certificates) than ‘Techdude’. This means that she would have been looking for distortions (corresponding to the ‘original name’ on the certificate) in a different place on the certificate than ‘Techdude’. Yet both she and Techdude came up with the same name (Maya’s) – on different locations in the certificate. KG announced Maya’s name in a comment, then ‘Techdude’ proclaimed that this matched his own discovery. The inconsistency should have set off warning bells (that this was a hoax on the part of ‘Techdude’) for anyone thinking critically. Just as Techdude’s July 8 ‘bunny boiled’ and July 20 ‘mutilated rabbit’ comments (noted above) should have been recognized.

            On a larger note.
            1. I cannot (and will not) tolerate exploitation of the movement against Obama by white supremacists (for their own ends). To do otherwise would be wrong (and tactically dumb as well).
            2. I think that what ‘Techdude’ was doing (and certain aspects of the ‘Cult of the COLB’) has the potential to send the PUMA movement off the rails. It damages the credibility of Obama’s opponents (making us look like a bunch of dishonest loonies), diverts our efforts, and has already caused serious fractures in the PUMA movement. There are better ways to go about this. At the risk of ‘outing’ my own identity – I precipitated a front page story (by raising questions about Obama misrepresenting his life story) in the Sunday edition of a major national newspaper (three Pinnochios for Obama, with subsequent coverage by FOX and MSNBC). It seems that I helped bring about a major CNN story as well. So it’s possible to do. But I cannot and will not countenance dishonesty (or hatred – which I see too much of in the comments at No Quarter). If the Democratic forces opposed to Obama descend to this, we’re no better than the Kos crowd (e.g. with their ‘darkened skin’ smear of Hillary).

  • JohnT

    Obot Crazy G: All of you are Kool-Aid Drinkers. If you believe your MESSIAH Obama is eligible, why don’t you ask him to produce his real physical BC to the public?

    ACT NOW, Folks to take Mr HUSSEIN down from the nomination in the Denver.

    • Andrew

      He did. Techdude’s insinuations that the released COLB was a forgery were conclusively debunked.

      At any rate, Techdude’s assertations were ridiculous on their face even aside from all of the technical banter – he claimed that the underlying name on the COLB was Maya Soetoro – which simply wouldn’t be the case. Maya was born in Indonesia and wouldn’t have a Hawaiian COLB in the first place, and so the idea that *her* Hawaiian COLB was a template to “forge” an Obama COLB necessarily implies that the Obama team *first* crafted a completely unnecessary fake COLB for Maya, for the purposes of then compounding the forgery to create a fake COLB for Obama.

      If the team had the ability to forge Maya’s from scratch, why wouldn’t they forge Obama’s from scratch?

      And that simply objetion is even leaving aside the fact that actual forensic examiners who publish under their own names with a fully transparent list of credentials have conclusively debunked all the technical aspects of the forgery investigation, as well.

      The entire thing is a no-go. Obama has a valid Hawaiian COLB and has released an undoctored image of it.

      That’s not even mentioning they have eligibility panels that look into this kind of thing, and not a peep has been heard from them, either.

      • Hope Floats

        There is nothing to say that Maya couldn’t have been born in Indonesia then brought to Hawaii as a small infant and had a COLB procured for her. Three experts besides Techdude said the BC was obviously a fake. There is something going on.

      • elise

        Andrew, would you mind providing a link to the two
        forensic examiners who have seen and verified the lack of authenticity of the COLB printed by Techdude? If you could give me their names and email addresses, I have some questions for them. Did they do their work pro bono or will I have to pay them? BTW Andrew, do you yourself have any credentials or bonfires. If you wouldn’t mind, could you send your email address and information about schools you have attended and organizations to which you belong? I can provide another place for you to send them if you don’t feel comfortable doing so here. I would like to double check what I have from Techdude to the real experts before I send them along to the IL State Bar president. I have told him i would try to provide links. So far, he seems to like me and I don’t want to cause him any unnecessary work. I intend to file a complaint with the ethics committee. Have you been able to “debunk” the picture of the school registration? The Bar Association has a copy of his application to the Bar so that is not needed. I thought I would just take it one piece at a time. Since the name of the photographer was given, they might be able to get it straight from him. I think the accuracy of the other documents would more properly go to another agency. I have a very close friend in a neighboring town, he’s the Assistant DA there, and he said he thought he could get someone from the CBI to take a look. Anything you can provide will greatly appreciated. I believe I may also have a constitutional law expert lined up to look at the questions. Can you get back to me right away on this. Time is of the essense.

    • Rob in Chicago

      The Obama camp learned Karl Rove’s tactics well. They also learned how easy it is to take down a seasoned journalist by introducing phony documents (on Bush’s Texas Air National Guard records) through shady channels. The furor at Dan Rather for taking the bait on the phony documents completely undermined the issue of whether the allegations in the documents were true, and silenced any further mainstream news media interest in even looking for the truth, much less reporting the truth. If the Obama cult can throw enough doubt on the document analysis, they think that they can then completely de-rail the entire issue of Obama’s birth records and eligibility.

  • Pingback: ARTICLE II, SECTION2, CLAUSE 5 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES « Dianej’s Weblog

    • Justsaygoodriddance

      “I HAVE ONE QUESTIONS” What are you drunk.

      • elise

        Justsay, if you want to mock every typo on this or any other blog while contributing nothing intellegent to the discussion, perhaps someone can draft a comment full of them for you to occupy your time. Or I could sugest buying a set of legos.

  • sayitisntso

    The burden of proof is OBlow’s. Nobody else’s.

  • http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/08/remember-this-one/ Khan Krum

    Looks like the black panther’s head is starting to come out of the bag!

  • ultra

    *smh*

    I’ll just address one point. The constitution of the Nation of Kenya does not, nor ever has, allowed dual citizenship. So the whole ‘Obama has dual citizenship is bullsh*t.

    http://kenya.rcbowen.com/constitution/chap6.html#97

    • no waffles aka drkate

      not a problem for our analysis here. He did have british and then kenyan citizenship, just because of his father. he had to affirmatively declare kenyan citizenship to keep it when he was 23. He probably did not.

      kenya is the diversion. Indonesia is where he is in trouble. He lied about his background to cover up the one thing that would make him ineligible–his indonesian citizenship.

      I’m not stopping with this letter. by the time the convention rolls around you can be sure everyone will know Obama is going to be challenged in every state.

  • ownaa

    at this point any thing against the fraud is a good thing. in it self the letter would be more forceful if it comes from groups not individuals. so I suggest in each state make contacts with the group(s) who worked with Hillary and / or against obama and have them sponser the letter. also make shorter and to the poit really fast will be helpful. remember people who supported this fraud are into reading or research so make it easier on them

  • Perry Logan

    We should pursue the eligibility issue for two important reasons:

    1) It would be condign punishment for Obama, who got where he is by disqualifying his opponents, and
    2) it really cheeses the Obamites. ;-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCRLBJfVXIQ

  • blog force one

    I think i have figured out what Barry Soetoro did! AKA BARAK OBAMA. His LEGAL NAME was changed to Barry Soetoro and his birth certificate was amended to reflect his new adopted name When he was 6 or 7. the former COLB was sealed by the Hawaii State authorities. He then Had Indonesian citizenship. after his return to Hawaii no longer identified with his step-father Lolo Soetoro. He had in his possession a copy of the FIRST BIRTH CERTIFICATE THAT WAS CANCELLED BY THE HAWAII sTATE AUTHORITIES! He, after traveling to Pakistan and possibly ,from there Mecca, Saudi Arabia and back, DESTROYED HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT. He Then fraudulently obtained a Hawaii drivers lic. with The copy of His then cancelled Birth certificate under the name Barack Hussein Obama! With a U.S. drivers lic. and his dog eared birth certificate with the name Barack Hussein Obama! After that, he applied for and got a U.S.passport!Nobody could have known that the “birth certificate that they were presented had been amended and the person standing in front of them has a different LEGAL NAME! Barry Soetoro! NO DOUBT HE NEVER LEGALLY CHANGED HIS NAME TO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PRIOR TO RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT! he may have done so very recently though, however, all of the things that he has done prior to His LEGALLY CHANGING HIS NAME TO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ARE ILLEGAL AND NULL AND VOID !INCLUDING HIS LAW AND COLLEGE DEGREES, HIS SENATE TITLE , EVEN HIS NAME ON ALL OF THE PRIMARIES!

    IT IS A SIMPLE CASE OF FRAUDULENT IDENTITY!

  • blog force one

    I think I have figured out what Barry Soetoro did! AKA BARAK OBAMA. His LEGAL NAME was changed to Barry Soetoro and his birth certificate was amended to reflect his new adopted name When he was 6 or 7. The former COLB was sealed by the Hawaii State authorities. He then Had Indonesian citizenship. after his return to Hawaii he no longer identified with his step-father Lolo Soetoro. He had in his possession a copy of the FIRST BIRTH CERTIFICATE THAT WAS CANCELLED BY THE HAWAII sTATE AUTHORITIES! He, after traveling to Pakistan and possibly ,from there Mecca, Saudi Arabia and back, DESTROYED HIS INDONESIAN PASSPORT. He Then fraudulently obtained a Hawaii drivers lic. with The copy of His then cancelled Birth certificate under the name Barack Hussein Obama! With a U.S. drivers lic. and his dog eared birth certificate with the name Barack Hussein Obama! he then also applied for and got a U.S.PASSPORT!Nobody could have known that the “birth certificate that they were presented had been CANCELLED AND amended and the person standing in front of them has a different LEGAL NAME! Barry Soetoro! NO DOUBT HE NEVER LEGALLY CHANGED HIS NAME TO BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PRIOR TO RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT! He may have done so very recently though, however, all of the things that he has done prior ARE ILLEGAL AND NULL AND VOID !INCLUDING HIS LAW AND COLLEGE DEGREES, HIS SENATE TITLE , EVEN HIS NAME ON ALL OF THE PRIMARIES!

    IT IS A SIMPLE CASE OF FRAUDULENT IDENTITY!

    • http://dontcallmesweetie.blogspot.com/ Blu

      If Barry changed his name to Barack wouldn’t a “Notice of Change of Name” have been published in the Hawaiian Newspaper? The current law states that the notice must be published within 60 days of the order.

  • blog force one

    Second post is cleaned up.!

  • harvey

    Was easy for Obama to get a passport BACK INTO India (in 1981 for spring break) seeing as hoe (typo) he was already a citizen of that country. From India he visited Pakistan, still early on in 1981 SPRING break, at which time Arabic youths from all around the world were answering the call to Jihad against the Russian invaders in Afghanistan. The Arabic youths (Islamic-Muslim-whatever) mostly served in supply capacities (ammo and water boys etc). It would be interesting to see WHAT his name and nationality was on his Pakistan passport.

  • Steve1

    Listen everybody…there is one way to resolve the issue of Mr. Obama’s true birth. Mr. Obama simply has to release his BC? End of story. What is the problem-why no original BC? What is being covered-up? All Mr. Obama or Soetoro has to do is release his BC? Can anyone answer my question? What is the problem? While I’m at it, where are his medical records? McCain has released both documents!

    Now, I’m a life-long Democract so is my family and associates and we are all questions, that are not being answered by the Obama campaign-all we see are attacks on those who have legitconcerns regarding BO?

    • Rob in Chicago

      Steve1:

      I don’t think that the Obama camp wants to resolve this issue, especially if they do have legitimate and non-damaging documents and complete paper trails in their possession. There is no incentive whatsoever for them to resolve this issue at this time, as it is the perfect smoke screen, keeping the attention off of other faults and shortcomings. They laugh at the time we are spending arguing about this and engaging their trolls. While these birth record/eligibility issues should not be ignored, they should be worked on by experts behind closed doors, with results issued and published if/only when they are air-tight and irrefutable. All of this opinionated speculation by both sides is getting us nowhere. I would love to see Obama exposed for the fraud he is before the court of public opinion on these eligibility issues, but we just don’t seem to have the solid case yet, and the technical “experts” we have seen advancing our cause, are not holding up very well to scrutiny. We do, however, have solid proof of other Obama lies and fraud, and there are more than enough issues and instances of thses types of falsehoods to keep any sane person awake at night worrying about the safety and sanity of our nation if Obama gets elected to POTUS.

  • indy

    This is a great letter/article. We need to put it in a full page ad in USA Today or some naational paper so we can break it open into the media and the awareness of the electorate and superdelegates BEFORE the convention. I think we could all fund it. Does someone have a contact at PUMAPAC to make this happen??? we have little time left and a lot of powerful ammunition.

    • no waffles aka drkate

      thanks Indy. finding out cost of adds right now.

  • http://confloyd connie floyd

    Thank God we are not giving up, after watching another show last night it sounded as if everyone was giving up and just blindly going to vote for McCain. While I have nothing against McCain and will vote for him if I have to, Hillaryis who we need NOW, no one else!

  • standard

    I think his kicking out Clinton delegates
    is the biggest scandal of this primary season.

  • rachel

    does anyone know if Obama visited city hall when in Hawaii – was he trying to get stuff changed???

  • Doris T.

    I called my SOS office. They said it was a federal matter and to contact my Congressmen.

    Sorry, but mailings and emails are just going to be ignored. People flooded the DNC with emails, didn’t get them anywhere.

    Unless pressured legally, a group with lawyers and face-to-face with the Attorney General of each state with these documents in hand, all the effort everyone is giving will be for nothing.

    I’ve been waiting for months. Now two weeks before the Denver convention, we are seeing documents. If Obama comes up with an original BC from Hawaii with Barack Obama as his given name, any other info will be swept under the rug.

    If he wasn’t African-American, he would have already been pressured to drop out a very, long time ago. So, the MSM, Democratic Party, Republican Party and anyone else that has had a hand in it have allowed Obama to get this far due to his race. And he has gotten the royal treatment, but he still isn’t happy and he pulls out his race card.

    Get a qualified African-American as a candidate and watch how far he/she will get without all the BS. People will be listening to the candidate and his/her issues rather than a rockstar/american idol mentality.

    Sharpton was on the last presidential ballot. I can’t imagine anyone taking this man seriously as a viable candidate.

    So, why hasn’t the African-American community with their leaders started a more aggressive attempt to poll for candidates that qualify not just by formal but also by informal credentials….more experience, comunity service, an individual known for his/her honesty and integrity, etc.

    I don’t know the answer above because when they actually had Sharpton on the ballot, African-American leaders gave away their own credibility to discern who they need as a presidential leader.

    WHEN NO QUARTER TAKES ACTION BY ACQUIRING ATTORNEYS TO FILE THESE COMPLAINTS AT THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE OF EACH STATE, THEN I’LL JOIN THE BANDWAGON.

    Otherwise, it all becomes headlines to get everyone hyped up and it never goes anywhere.

    • no waffles aka drkate

      your state contact told you wrong. It IS a state matter if you are looking to challenge Obama’s name being put onto the ballot in each state. This is why I drafted the letter and made it specific.

      There are other actions you can take, like writing a LTE based on this document to highlight problems…there are some shortened versions as well. Or send the letter to SOS, and if they don’t respond, tell them you will release it to the press.

      This has to get out now as many people are “locking down” for Obama. I do think they intend to steal the election.

  • kgirl1028

    I just saw a Gallup pole on Hillbuzz. Obama an McCain are now tied. I doubt PUMA has caused this completely, but i do think that obama is showing himself to be as wee as we have always said he was. Obama hasn’t even made it to the convention and already people are questioning his competency, and it has nothing to do with racism and everything to do with a person who does not seem up to task. I wish blacks would stop trying to guilt whites to vote for a man who so clearly and arrogantly chose to run for office, without a leg to stand on. AA know they have to do ten times better than whites to provide competency but obama stepped up to the plate with C game let along A and there for I have no sympathy for him. He cheated and race baited, and lost any respect I might have mustered to have for him. To Quote Obama/Soetoro, Barack Obama is not as good as he was or he could be, and I don’t want my children having to look up at a black president like that.”Both Mccain and Hillary are better people,

  • kgirl1028

    And to the white members on this board I don’t want you to be uncomfortable but it’s a fact, Blacks are not normally seen “equally as whites” by other whites but then ugly people are treated worst than pretty people, so life just sucks like that. how ever we have had a lot more options that my parents and grandparents had, and to see obama squander that, and to see him willing to throw away freedom of speech with his FISA votes, intimidation tactics, and Makeshift concentration camps, when people like of my parents era were beaten, attacked by dogs, beaten, jailed and some times killed to give blacks the right to have a voice and equality. So I don’t take it lightly when you have people trying to take that voice away. And to see Barak and intelligent person lie and manipulate his way to the top knowing he was not prepared, eats me. It’s like he has no appreciation that my mother had to take a trek into downtown Jim Crow Columbia to get to school when there was a high school up the street but it was for whites. Or the fact she couldn’t play in a park right by her house because it was a “white park” Or that she was born at home because my grandmother couldn’t go to the “white” hospital. And even if my dad loves him cause it’s something symbolic for him i see Obama as Simple Simon who wants a piece of pie and has no money to pay for it. Then calls the pieman racist. Sorry obama you have to pay for your pie.

    • Wisewoman

      kgirl
      I feel you. How do you think I feel to see this man race-bait his way to the position he is in. I am a black, female Hillary supporter. I retired early and was able to closely watch the primaries. The Clinton haters (dems and repubs), far left liberals, and far right repubs did a hatchet job on Hillary. The repubs crossed over in large numbers to deny her the numbers she needed for an outright victory. But most of all it was Obama and his campaign’s false racial charges against the Clintons that hurt her the most. I personally marched with Dr. King as a college student in Jackson, MS. I can also remember Sammy Davis Jr., Burt Lancaster, and Peter Lawford helping to raise money and support at a small private black college called Tougaloo outside Jackson, MS as if it were yesterday. By his actions Obama has dishonored Dr. King, me, and others (white and black) who struggled and fought against racist policies. I despise and detest him for that and I WILL NEVER, VOTE FOR HIM, EVER!!

  • Francis

    So I called my Secretary of State’s office. Her’s a transcript of the conversation:

    SOS office: “Good afternoon. Secretary of State’s office. Can I help you?”

    me: “Hi, I would like to see if I could have you review Obama’s eligibility for the MN ballot”

    SOS: “Why do you wish to question Sen Obama’s eligibility?”

    me: “I have conclusive evidence that Obama was born in either Canada, Kenya, Indonesia, Mozambique, Serbia, or Iceland.”

    SOS: “Do you have proof Obama was born in CanadaKenyaIndonesiaMozambiqueSerbiaIceland?”

    me: “Yes, I read a comphrehensive report written on the internet by Tech-dude and Texas Darlin.”

    SOS: “But that’s pretty thin sir”

    me: “Ordinarily I may have dismissed it, but the site is owned by Larry Johnson”

    SOS: “You mean the basketball player? Grand-ma-ma?”

    me: “No Larry Johnson the guy who discovered the whitey tape showing Michelle Obama saying whitey in Rev. Wright’s church while eating a bucket of KFC with Louis Farahkhan and Yassir Arafat”

    SOS: “We’ll get right on it.”

    • Ferdberfle

      The Talking Mule Troll is back braying and making an ass of himself.

    • no waffles aka drkate

      you thin that is cute, franc-ASS? Let me tell you that my state has already sent my letter to the state AG. He’s not making it on the ballot here, this will be the first official state challenge to his eligibility.

      deal with it, jerk. Obama-Soetoro bot! Your guy can’t even tell the truth about his own life.

    • doctorwang

      Wow, it really sounded like your Secretary of State was going to get on the ball and grab the tiger by the tail. Good for you, Francis! Mentioning Larry Johnson was a smart move on your part. Adding Tech-dude’s and Texas Darlin’s name was like putting icing on the cake. I’m sure you’ll be hearing back soon!!

      Whoooot! Whoooot!

  • http://www.everfort.zp.ua Arodaordilm

    presence has its Ukrainian delegate located in Brobdingnagian-compass industrial center of Ukraine metropolis of Zaporozhye. Zaporozhye locality is spout known in the the human race as “metal determination” or “metal smashing community” of Ukraine.
    presence has away relations with producers of iron, nerve, pipes, ferroalloys, aluminium, abrasive materials, abrasive tools, coated abrasives e. c.
    transpacific sell dependent of our presence fills itself compelling and in strength creating responsibility based upon

  • http://www.furl.net/item/38110162 alazarnsem

    Cialis (Tadalafil) is employed for treating erectile dysfunction in men (e.g., feebleness). Comparing with Viagra, Cialis works in as post-haste as 30 minutes and lasts for yon 36 hours while Viagra force lasts up to 5 hours.Besides, according to the meticulous results, Cialis is not artificial by bread or beverages. I buy cialis here
    buy cialis without a pres
    buy cialis without a pres

  • Hope Floats

    No, dumbass. You burned the house down. There is no place else for them to go but to the Republicans. It was Obama supporters who put the idea out there, too – Donna Brazile said “stay home,” Obama himself said Hillary was like Bush, and his supporters started to call their own party Republicans. You people are off your rockers, if you think calling people racists will make them vote for Obama. Guilt, threat, name- calling and tantrums. You’ve fucked yourself out of another election this time.

  • Obama is a bum

    Do you have any brain cells that actually work?

  • C.S.

    ~“racist is just for starters,these people are slobs,ignorant and they didn’t win so they want to take their ball and go home,“~

    Obama’s hired mercenaries must just run their finger down a page in their play book and spit out a phrase because it makes no sense to say voters have to vote for Obama because he has squeezed the life out of the Democratic party and now they want Voters to resuscitate it. Ding dong, that party’s dead and it committed suicide in Obama’s name.

    But that doesn’t mean that it can’t rise from the ashes like a phoenix to become a better, more powerful advocacy of We the People. Just let us finish mourning what we’ve lost at the August funeral and then we’ll begin again and this time we’ll make sure the Obama virus doesn’t infect it again.

    (Obama won? Since when is stealing something defined as winning it? I can just see the trial of the first thief who uses The Obama Defense, can’t you?)

  • no waffles aka drkate

    hey bot! were you even able to read the letter? do you see the substantive points against Obama? This letter went to a Secretary of State. Not a racist charge in there.

    you know, questioning Obama has nothing to do with race, turdblossom.

    I’m not sure you are American, are you? Otherwise you would be concerned about this. Well, maybe you’re only about 12 or so, that would explain it.

  • Hope Floats

    It’s from the AP, and the Chicago Tribune reported on it. They tried to minimize the damage, though.

  • Obama is a bum

    Go back to Kos with the rest of your pathetic racist friends.

  • C.S.

    We know that, loyal9, we watched Obama post that forged crap! So I guess that makes you the sorry one for not asking your candidate the hard questions yourself. And I doubt anyone will be upset about knowing President McCain’s real name instead of one of Obama’s many aliases.

    And why doesn’t your candidate have the same papertrail as other citizens do? He can’t even produce documents from his time as a public servant in the Illinois Senate, let alone all the identification every citizen must carry with them now! Because, until 2004, Obama was just an ordinary guy not entitled to the elite privileges he demands today.

  • Ai1een

    loyal9,
    Not to embarrass you, but just for the record,because you repeatedly use incorrect grammar, it’s “you’re” when you are wanting to say “you are going to get mccain” NOT “your” which should be used to show possession. If we get McCain – at least “his ass” will be an American ass and at least we all know he is loyal to the United States of America.

  • Obama is a bum

    Are you mad because you could never pass the first grade or is it because Obama did not pick Wright as VP. Go back to your black liberation theology church and cry.

    UNITED STATES FIGHTING AGAINST OBAMA!

  • Justsaygoodriddance

    freerepublic is calling

  • Karma

    LOL!!!

  • Grail Guardian

    His name was Kenneth Lay, and even after he died he was able to get away with stealing from tens of thousands of people and still be buried as a “not guilty by reason of not being alive to appeal his conviction”.

    These people have a different set of rules, and they can change them at will. Stop thinking of Obama as just an arrogant guy trying to get away with something. He is a deliberate corporate entity of the international elite, being used to steal the last vestiges of Democracy from us that George W. Bush was not able to wrest away in his eight year reign.

    This is not about Hillary or McCain, or even Obama, really. This about the privatization of America, a North American Union, and Global Corporate control. It’s about saving America.

    And we are all being used.

  • no waffles aka drkate

    yes, you just posted some.