Comments on: Republican Intellectual Dishonesty on Terrorism Continues [UPDATED] http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/ Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304775 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:56:29 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304775 Guest: <em>"they're weak, scared"</em> Clearly you are not terribly well educated and are one of those clueless left wing warriors who are too scared to confront enemies. Maybe if you were there in Manhattan that day you would not be as amazingly ignorant as you are today. I have zero tolerance for 9/11 surrender monkeys who use the events as a political punchline to suit their socialist ends. Guest:

“they’re weak, scared”

Clearly you are not terribly well educated and are one of those clueless left wing warriors who are too scared to confront enemies.

Maybe if you were there in Manhattan that day you would not be as amazingly ignorant as you are today.

I have zero tolerance for 9/11 surrender monkeys who use the events as a political punchline to suit their socialist ends.

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304774 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:51:04 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304774 <em>"It is a flagrant violation of the Constitution"</em> When you make as ignorant a statement as this, then back it up with facts. I have zero tolerance for anyone who learned nothing from 9/11 and uses it as a political punchline. It is precisely attitudes like yours which cause 9/11. If you already have not, read the 9/11 Commission report, please. “It is a flagrant violation of the Constitution”

When you make as ignorant a statement as this, then back it up with facts.

I have zero tolerance for anyone who learned nothing from 9/11 and uses it as a political punchline. It is precisely attitudes like yours which cause 9/11. If you already have not, read the 9/11 Commission report, please.

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304773 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:47:40 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304773 Actually I come with information and facts. I never comment on something I do not know about. You, on the other hand just insult and bloviate and have no orginal thoughts of your onw. The library open at 10 AM. Be there. Actually I come with information and facts. I never comment on something I do not know about.
You, on the other hand just insult and bloviate and have no orginal thoughts of your onw.
The library open at 10 AM. Be there.

]]> By: mountainaires http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304761 mountainaires Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:09:06 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304761 http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_alleged_al_qaeda_linked_attacks=firstwtcbombing http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&complete_911_timeline_alleged_al_qaeda_linked_attacks=firstwtcbombing

]]> By: mountainaires http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304759 mountainaires Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:03:06 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304759 "lots of old hands at CIA and FBI were convinced that Saddam was behind the February, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. " This is just laughable. The CIA/FBI knew who was behind the 1993 WTC Bombing. They didn't think it was Saddam Hussein.  “lots of old hands at CIA and FBI were convinced that Saddam was behind the February, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. ”

This is just laughable. The CIA/FBI knew who was behind the 1993 WTC Bombing. They didn’t think it was Saddam Hussein. 

]]> By: AC http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304749 AC Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:09:22 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304749 Hokma, that's all you do, is insult people.  When they ask you to back up what you write you immediately begin the ad hominem  in support of your logical fallacies.  You say that you were not trying to insult Jazzman but you write: <strong>"I'm not going to provide a history lesson here. If youa re not curious or intelligent enough to go to the library and read then forget it. This is information that is readily available." </strong> I won't even get into all the other invectives you spew when someone disagrees with you. But why don't you defend this other ridiculous statement you made: <strong>"FDR authorized the tribunals on his own. Stalin and Churchill had nothing to do with it. Maybe you are thinking of the Nuremberg trials."</strong> Hokma, that’s all you do, is insult people.  When they ask you to back up what you write you immediately begin the ad hominem  in support of your logical fallacies.  You say that you were not trying to insult Jazzman but you write:
“I’m not going to provide a history lesson here. If youa re not curious or intelligent enough to go to the library and read then forget it. This is information that is readily available.” 
I won’t even get into all the other invectives you spew when someone disagrees with you. But why don’t you defend this other ridiculous statement you made:
“FDR authorized the tribunals on his own. Stalin and Churchill had nothing to do with it. Maybe you are thinking of the Nuremberg trials.”

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304745 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:07:14 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304745 Larry presented a case that is historically out of context. The focus during the 1980's and prior was on the Cold War (Larry seemed to leave that out). This was not even a major focus in post-Cold War until 9/11. That is a fact documented by the 9/11 Commission. Should we have been paying more attention to radical Islam prior to 9/11 and for decades - yes. But who knew? Should we have assumed the world was round before Columbus set out for America? No - but who knew? Larry presented a case that is historically out of context. The focus during the 1980′s and prior was on the Cold War (Larry seemed to leave that out). This was not even a major focus in post-Cold War until 9/11. That is a fact documented by the 9/11 Commission.

Should we have been paying more attention to radical Islam prior to 9/11 and for decades – yes. But who knew? Should we have assumed the world was round before Columbus set out for America? No – but who knew?

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304744 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:03:35 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304744 AC - I was refering to the statement made by Jazzman without trying to insult. You, on the other hand, probably never heard of a library card and evidently since you have nothing substantive to ever contribute has no more than a 3rd grade education. You may want to try one of those matchbook schools to get an education. Frankly I know first graders who say more intelligent things than you. Now go away. AC – I was refering to the statement made by Jazzman without trying to insult. You, on the other hand, probably never heard of a library card and evidently since you have nothing substantive to ever contribute has no more than a 3rd grade education. You may want to try one of those matchbook schools to get an education. Frankly I know first graders who say more intelligent things than you. Now go away.

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304742 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:00:44 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304742 <em>"According to our traditions? Eh which traditons are those?"</em> I'm not going to provide a history lesson here. If youa re not curious or intelligent enough to go to the library and read then forget it. This is information that is readily available. “According to our traditions? Eh which traditons are those?”

I’m not going to provide a history lesson here. If youa re not curious or intelligent enough to go to the library and read then forget it. This is information that is readily available.

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304741 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:57:43 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304741 Name the US Law that is being violated or stifle. What International Law is being broken? If you read (ie library books) anything from Samuel Huntington to any credible book on the jihad against the west you might have a substantive answer. You would also know that we are at war and it is reckless and irresponsible to hide behind the effort to treat this as a police criminal action. Name the US Law that is being violated or stifle. What International Law is being broken?

If you read (ie library books) anything from Samuel Huntington to any credible book on the jihad against the west you might have a substantive answer. You would also know that we are at war and it is reckless and irresponsible to hide behind the effort to treat this as a police criminal action.

]]> By: Hokma http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304740 Hokma Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:50:37 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304740 You have got to be kidding??!!! Do you honestly believe that Thomas Jefferson et al were thinking of Italians or French when they were wiritng this? Sorry, I'm not answering this anymore. You have got to be kidding??!!! Do you honestly believe that Thomas Jefferson et al were thinking of Italians or French when they were wiritng this? Sorry, I’m not answering this anymore.

]]> By: EllenD http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304703 EllenD Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:56:39 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304703 oops courts. oops courts.

]]> By: EllenD http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304702 EllenD Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:56:11 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304702 Look, the 80 incidents Larry has referred to are terrorist attacks and attempted attacks against Americans. It has nothing to do with the Cold War. There is no military attacking us, so the courst are the appropriate venue. Look, the 80 incidents Larry has referred to are terrorist attacks and attempted attacks against Americans. It has nothing to do with the Cold War.

There is no military attacking us, so the courst are the appropriate venue.

]]> By: EllenD http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304697 EllenD Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:52:00 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304697 Wow. Threats. Sure makes the Tea Party folks appealing to me (not). Wow. Threats. Sure makes the Tea Party folks appealing to me (not).

]]> By: DB http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/41781/republican-intellectual-dishonesty-on-terrorism-continues/#comment-1304696 DB Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:48:45 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=41781#comment-1304696 Larry, your igno-freak liberal roots are showing again. Dick Cheney may have engaged in some speculation that Saddam was behind 9-11. That's because lots of old hands at CIA and FBI were convinced that Saddam was behind the February, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Cheney looked into a lot of theories, and frankly, he should have. That's his job. The fact remains that when George Bush gave the SOTU speech in 2002, he did in fact say, we have no evidence that Saddam was behind the 9-11 attacks." Sorry, bud. It's just a fact. The Bush administration NEVER said that Saddam was behind 9-11. This is a matter of record, so go read it and weep. And while you're at it, please stay the hell away from us Tea Party folks. When we take out Obama and your fellow Democratic-Trotskyite friends in Congress we are going to remember your kow-towing to the Let's-Spend-Ourselves-Dead types like your hero Hillary Clinton, the second most Stalinist politician from Illinois. 8-) Larry, your igno-freak liberal roots are showing again. Dick Cheney may have engaged in some speculation that Saddam was behind 9-11. That’s because lots of old hands at CIA and FBI were convinced that Saddam was behind the February, 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Cheney looked into a lot of theories, and frankly, he should have. That’s his job. The fact remains that when George Bush gave the SOTU speech in 2002, he did in fact say, we have no evidence that Saddam was behind the 9-11 attacks.” Sorry, bud. It’s just a fact. The Bush administration NEVER said that Saddam was behind 9-11. This is a matter of record, so go read it and weep. And while you’re at it, please stay the hell away from us Tea Party folks. When we take out Obama and your fellow Democratic-Trotskyite friends in Congress we are going to remember your kow-towing to the Let’s-Spend-Ourselves-Dead types like your hero Hillary Clinton, the second most Stalinist politician from Illinois. 8-)

]]>