RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

How Corrupt Are We?

Whether it’s AIG’s perverse multiple rewarding of the executives who almost brought our economy down or the likes of Bernie Madoff and Ken Lay, we see our country as rife with greed at the expense of weary American taxpayers. The 2009 Global Corruption Report by watchdog group Transparency International has some stunning revelations about us and the rest of the world.

For the United States there is both good news and bad news.

Here’s some good news. Out of 180 countries surveyed, the United States is tied in 18th place with Belgium and Japan as having lower amounts of business and political corruption. Denmark gets the best rating followed by New Zealand and Sweden. Better ratings reflect political stability, long-established conflict-of-interest regulations and solid, functioning public institutions.

The worst offender is Somalia followed by Myanmar, Iraq, Haiti, and Afghanistan. (Notice two especially interesting countries at the bottom of the barrel?) China weighs in as tied with 8 other countries for 72nd place, and Russia tied with 3 other countries at a dismal 147th.

It appears that we have made some improvements compared to most countries when it comes to corrupt practices. The report notes that “despite prominent corruption scandals and the lack of transparency and accountability that has been shown to lie at the root of the financial crisis, there has been encouraging and real progress towards stronger corporate integrity.” This is not to say that we are doing great. The report continues, “Corporate performance in the fight against corruption often does not yet match corporate commitments, however.”

Before patting ourselves on the back for making positive strides, it is important to mention that most of the rest of the world is a stinking cesspool of sleaze, so it’s relative. And interestingly, we are skidding backwards in one area. Can you guess which one?

If you guessed lobbying our legislators, you are correct. Lobbying, after all, is a euphemism for bribery. And bribery of one sort or another is often at the root of corruption.

Despite the fact that the United States is one of the few countries that regulates lobbyists, lobbying expenses have almost doubled over the last decade, reaching $2.8 billion in 2007. The all-time record of the number of lobbyists was 16,000 in 2008 (and this may have risen since then). The Center for Public Integrity, has consistently documented unethical ties between business, their Washington-based lobbyists, and powerful politicians.

Term limits and public campaign financing anyone? Maybe if those we elect to represent us know they only have so much time and so much money as opposed to hustling while trying to keep their jobs forever, we would attract candidates who only have the American peoples’ best interests at heart.

The complete and extremely detailed Transparency International report can be accessed and downloaded here.

  • Sassy

    Cute little money-grubber Pat!
    As to the seriousness of your text, I fear that corruption has metastasized to the point we cannot eradicate it. Voters are somewhat to blame, for they measure their officials by the visible ground-breakings in their communities.
    Term limits may help, but the permanent answer is to seek and elect persons of character.
    I cannot remember his name, but there is a young republican in the House from Utah who rooms in his office. We could use several hundred more like him!

  • arabella trefoil

    Definite yes on public campaign financing. Term limits, I’m not 100% convinced. On some of the European boards I hang out on, non-Americans say that there’s nothing wrong with the American political system that public campaign financing won’t fix.

    Of course, they don’t understand the full extent of the problem, especially with regard to our omnipresent corporate media, but it is interesting to hear input from other countries.

  • kenoshamarge

    I am on board for both public campaign finance and term limits.

    I believe that those who sit in the halls of congress for too long begin to believe that they know what’s best for us. Most of them become arrogant and I think they begin to play the “power” game. Their partisanship and party loyalty becomes more important that the well being of the country.

    I also think that staying to long at the “fair” tends to distance the politicians from the people that employ them.

  • lark

    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin told his ruling party on Friday it must pay more attention to ordinary voters, just days after one of the biggest opposition protests in a decade.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6145UJ20100205

    Putin was speaking to Democrats and Republicans alike.

  • mountainaires

    “Treason doth never prosper; what is the reason? For if it doth prosper, none dare call it treason. ” ~ Ovid

    FEBRUARY 2, 2010Warning: This is Not Another Wall Street Conspiracy Theory, These are the FactsBY SHAH GILANI, Contributing Editor, Money Morning
    http://moneymorning.com/2010/02/02/aig-collapse/

  • oowawa

    Hmmm mountainaires–thought the political couplet you cited originated with John Harington (1561-1612, Shakespeare’s contemporary) but perhaps he was translating/paraphrasing Ovid (43 BC – 17 or 18 AD).  Anyway, reading about Harington, I discovered that “Harington is most popularly known as the inventor of the flush toilet,” which I always had though was invented by Thomas Crapper (1836-1910), whom I always thought was named “John Crapper,” hence the common phrase “Gotta go to the John.”  Of course there are many who maintain that the water closet was first invented by Jack Shit:

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=jack%20shit

    Now some might question how these scholarly musings relate to the topic of bribe-taking congressmen.  I think it suggests that any contributions we make to politicians might as well be placed in the John/Crapper/Shitter because it is all going to be diluted and washed away by the flood of money generated by lobbyists.

    Nice cartoon Pat!  Looks like a $300 haircut to me!

  • Solara 9

    H’mmm–It is VERY interesting that Iraq and Afghanistan are among the worst offenders. 

    You have very interesting stories Pat.  Cute toon also.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    LOL $300 hair cut…

    That guy looks like Harry Reid looking in a funny mirror, grabbing the fat of the

    Interesting Pat as always!

  • ~~JustMe~~

    <img style=”margin-top: 0px; width: 24px; height: 24px; margin-left: 0px;” src=”//js-kit.com/avatar/gxpA99f0jKlohF_DgthroT-24×24.png”/>LOL $300 hair cut… 
     
    That guy looks like Harry Reid looking in a funny mirror, grabbing the fat of the land!
     
    Interesting Pat as always!

  • ~~JustMe~~

    LOL $300 hair cut…  
      
    That guy looks like Harry Reid looking in a funny mirror, grabbing the fat of the land! 
      
    Interesting Pat as always!

  • lark

    The practice protects your ‘real estate values’ and specifically tries also to protect commercial real estate values. Why? For hundreds of reason, but mainly to protect the tax base of counties and cities. In general it allows us to continue living in what we know as normal life. And who would want to upset normal? Yet as we continue our normal walk, we diminish against many international economies. We diminish because we can’t adapt. Who can’t? The younger generations.

  • lark

    This article reads much much clearer than the obscure intents at explaining we get here from LD. 

    The problem seats on the fact that our young people are not trusted by the professional class to rise to any occassion. It says clearly that our younger people do not prepare to solver our future problems. Thus the goverment needs to protect every corner of the economy.

    In the meantime, the younger people of many other countries are moving forward by leaps and bounds, while ours prepare for a service base economy.

    Good luck U.S.A.

  • Rich

    A very creative cartoon about a very serious subject that Obama knew about when he was running for President, and assured us he was going to fix.  This was one reason people voted for him, even though he had no experience in fixing anything. 
    Even though this is a serious problem, the more serious problem or in part the cause of the problem, is the public’s attitude that everyone in government is corrupt except their representative, and even if he or she is, as long as they brought the benefits of corruption to their state, it was OK to re-elect that person.  Who cared about answering the question is it good for the entire country?  Also, the attitude that one is too busy with life to think about whether what the government is doing is helping or hurting one’s life  as “not my business.”  And in addition the attitude, that experience does not count and instant magical answers is what we want to hear so we elect the person who gives us the best magical answers that sound like no pain is necessary in order to have gain.
    So here we are with the Democrats proving that the Republicans are the conservative ones or the conservative party and that the Democrats are the kings of credit card mentality or shop until you drop.
    Maybe the Tea Party is at least a ray of light that will tell the Democrats that the light they have been rushing toward is not the light at the end of a tunnel, but a train wreck coming their way.
    Rich

  • lark

    In a certain way, mountainaires, those practices kill the younger generation. Maybe the current professional financiers want to abort them. The Supreme Court will protect them too.

  • don x

    Neat cartoon, Pat, and an important topic presented well.

    Rich, I am impressed with your thoughtful analysis of the problem.

    I thin there is a lot more corruption in politics and government than is documented.  We don’t know how much money passes under the table unnoticed.  We only hear about it when someone is caught on the take.

    I would vote for term limits and public campaign financing as possibly helpful for the reasons you mention, Pat, although I think only the sharp and watchful eyes of the public can minimize corrupt practices.  Politicians of both parties need to be watched and monitored with the keen eyes of a hawk.

  • PssttCmere

    Check out freespeechforpeople.org and movetoamend.org.  Maybe there is a chance to repeal the lastest scotus abomination.

    “Say What You Will…It Feels So Good”

  • AC

    PssttCmere, appreciate the heads up.
    Now, Is everyone ready for some football!

  • PizzaDriver

    i’m just glad we elected a guy from Chicago to be POTUS; i’m sure he’ll clean things up…..  NOT!  our entire government, wall street, and most of the upper levels of business is rotten to the core with corruption.  it is one big incestuous circle, and we all know who’s getting screwed – the american people.

  • Marvin

    “Greed is good,” says Gordon Gecko in the 1980s movie Wall Street. “Greed is now legal, he says in the trailer for the upcoming sequel, which, incidentally, I just saw for the first time a couple of nights ago. He says this, of course, as he’s being released from prison.

    Hmmm…judging from your article an other people’s comments, it looks like he might be on to something…

    Thanks for the heads up, Pat!

  • Stan Davis

    Interesting topic, Pat, and cute cartoon.

    I’m not on board on term limits.  It seems as soon as we get a good, experienced state legislator about ready to assume legislative leadership, we lose him or her to term limits.  Colorado had a great Speaker of the House that had to retire.

    I’m okay with term-limiting executive positions, though.

    Now, about lobbyists.  They’re needed.  I’ve asked a few state legislators about the extent to which they rely on lobbyists for the technical aspects of an issue.  They unanimously said that the lobbyists are absolutely essential in forming good legislation.  The trick is to make sure that legislators hear all sides of an issue.

    That said, the role of lobbyists should be limited to providing information.  They probably also should be prohibited from giving money or raising funds for campaigns and candidates.  They should have to decide how they are going to exercise their right of free speech:  by giving and raising money or lobbying.

    Stan Davis
    Lakewood, CO

  • Stan Davis

    Controlled greed is what drives capitalism, but greed has been uncontrolled for far too long.

    Stan Davis
    Lakewood, CO

  • henry

    The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act, H.R. 1549/S. 619 is stalled.
    Why? Because of special interests lobbying

blog comments powered by Disqus