Quote “Didn’t we invade Iraq for less? Iraq = Dictator Leadership. Iran = Extremist Dictator Leadership. Iraq = Quietly acquiring fissile nuclear. Iran = Openly telling of plans to highly enrich uranium. Iraq = Secretly killing opposition. Iran = Globally broadcasting execution trials, beatings, and killings of opposition. Iraq = Burned Kuwati oil wells. Iran= Supplying Taliban and guerilla factions weapons to fight the U.S., harboring Al Quaida leaders, threatening U.S./Israel/U.K./France with war, working towards ICBM delivery methods and pretty much telling us to F off at the sanctions we keep throwing at them. Make sense to anyone else?”
He’s right, Iran is the true reasoning they should have been worried about when bush’s team gave the bs about invasion back in 2003. Saddam’s regime was nasty yes, but was well contained in the north and south by the u.s. and nato. By the way, i found his post both humorous in the irony and truthful.

take along look at maliki’s recent language toward ambassador hill in iraq. maliki lived in exile in iran for awhile. china recently forgave iraq’s debt. now do the math!

What kind of relationship did Bill Clinton and his administration develop with the Russians that can help SOS HC get anything through with the current Russian President and Prime Minister?

What kind of relationship did Bill Clinton and his administration develop with the Chinese that can help SOS HC get anything through with the current Chinese President and Prime Minister?

I think their objectives are to continue to do what they have been doing for almost 10 thousand years now without the help on anybody. But most importantly, not to allow the American moral degradation and decadence infiltrate and invade and change their beutiful time revered culture.

Hokma said, It’s this lack of imagination and unable to connect the dots.

But we have SOS HC no? She should have imagination, no? She should be able to connect the dots, no? Isn’t she so much more intelligent than anyone else? So why are you worried about lack of imagination and inability to connect the dots?

A. Cover your head, please. We don’t want an international incident.

B. China can have all the Saudi and Qatari oil in exchange for their Iran support.

C. Russia can have the entire North polar region to explore for oil in exchange for their Iran support.

D. You bring us back lots of smiles. Our problems are solved.

What has always intrigued me was this rah-rah over the so-called end of the Cold War and the fight against the worldwide menace of Communism. So when the Berlin Wall falls we all celebrate. But what about China? We didn’t beat them did we? Now they literaly own us.

I have read over the years since that China’s communist rulers would eventually have to shift to a more democratic form of government as part of their integration with capitalism. Doesn’t seem to be happening.

You have to wonder what their objectives are and what their game is.

I read that such a strike would buy Israel only some time because Iran could build them back quickly and would have even more resolve.

The one thing that could upset this would have been the success of the Iran dissidents, but Obama was too weak to support them when they needed it most.