RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Elizabeth Warren Calls for New Bank Stress Tests

The initial Bank Stress Tests run by Treasury Secretary Geithner were largely a sham. I questioned as much last April in writing, “Bank Stress Tests: Major Sham?”:

As with any test, the results are only meaningful if the process and proctor have unquestioned integrity. The proctors for the Bank Stress Test are none other than Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Fed chair Ben Bernanke. Why is a testing authority of the magnitude of FDIC, led by Sheila Bair, not more involved in the process? Ms. Bair is the one individual in our country with the greatest level of interaction with and understanding of the student body, that being the banking industry as a whole and individual banks specifically.

What does the FDIC, led by Ms. Bair, have to say about the upcoming Bank Stress Tests? The New York Post provides a CHILLING perspective:

The stress tests the government are about to conduct on some of the nation’s largest banks is being blasted by insiders at Sheila Bair’s Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., who say it’s a pointless exercise that’s more sizzle than steak.The FDIC’s basic beef with the stress test is that it is not a credible way to assess how much additional cash beaten-down banks will need to weather what many Wall Street experts predict will be more losses in the coming months.

The tests are conducted by the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve on the nation’s 19 biggest banks, including behemoths Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase.It’s a sham,” one source told The Post, describing the test as an “open-book, take-home exam” that doesn’t actually work.

While Geithner, Bernanke, Obama et al have openly declared victory in saving the banking system, there is a very credible voice in Washington calling for a new round of Bank Stress Tests. Who has the gall to make such a demand?

Elizabeth Warren.

Warren stated as much in a Bloomberg interview I watched this morning. She is calling for new tests, not only for the 19 large money center banks but also the regional and community banks, as well. Why is Warren calling for this reexamination? Her primary concern currently centers on the pending and expected losses within the commercial real estate space through 2013.

When asked how her call for new tests has been received by Tim Geithner and team at Treasury, Warren succinctly used the term, “resistance.”

No surprise there . . . but also no transparency there, either.

LD

  • dead lark

    What can you expect from people whose God is Mammon?

  • dead lark

    LD says, No surprise there . . . but also no transparency there, either.

    What can you expect from people whose God is Mammon?

  • oowawa

    Okay, every time I see Elizabeth Warren in an interview, I feel like standing up and cheering.  What’s this she’s saying?  It sounds like the truth, and hearing it is such a strange feeling.  How’s EW as a candidate for the national ticket?  Her resume is very impressive:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Warren

  • arabella trefoil

    Thank you, Larry Doyle.

  • dead lark

    Get your nose in your books, you fool.

    You better quit this place if you are studying.

    There I said it.

  • Peggy Sue

    I caught Elizabeth Warren on Morning Joe yesterday morning.  It’s the first time I saw her truly angry and she was talking about this “resistance.”  Caught her again on one of the financial shows talking about the new credit card regulations and the effect of commercial real estate defaults on small community banks, the idea of getting ahead of the wave.  In that conversation she was firm and would not be talked over. Good for her!

    She’s getting more air time and I hope that continues.  She appears to be one of the few honest voices out there right now.

  • Linda Anselmi

    LD -

    Any thoughts or insights on this?  I tend to error on the side of skepticism when it comes to Golman Sachs alumni.  

    [GATA] CFTC’s Gensler turns back on Wall Street to push derivatives overhaul

    http://www.gata.org/node/8323

  • Brodie

    Hooray for Elizabeth Warren!! She rocks- and I’m hoping she’ll rock this lousy, leaky rowboat of a banking system!

  • dead lark

    The only one that is going to rock the corrupt banking system is China. And since you own them your spleen, they’ll take your liver too – just to take away your bitterness and make you happy.

  • Linda Anselmi

    Go Elizabeth!  Go LD!

    You both have been skeptical of the bank stress tests from day one.  Keep fighting the good fight!  

  • oowawa

    This stress test will be like the last one–a whitewash.  It looks to me that this is what’s happening: the banks are carrying lots of bogus assets on their balance sheets that are worth substantially less than they say, and this deceptive accounting is made possible by “mark to model,” or “mark to fantasy” accounting practices (as opposed to “mark to market“:

    On April 9, 2009, FASB issued the official update to FAS 157[20] that eases the mark-to-market rules when the market is unsteady or inactive. Early adopters were allowed to apply the ruling as of March 15, 2009, and the rest as of June 15, 2009. It was anticipated that these changes could significantly boost banks’ statements of earnings and allow them to defer reporting losses.[21] . . .
    Opponents argue that the implications for investors are that the valuation of assets underlying such securities will be increasingly difficult to analyze, not less so. An example would be determining a company’s actual assets, equity and earnings, which will be overstated if the assets are not allowed to be marked down appropriately.

    Because of the housing collapse, the banks are holding many assets that are worth much less than is being reported in their accounting.  If this were discovered by any authentic “stress test,” many more banks would collapse, putting much more pressure on an already hammered FDIC.  This is all so complicated.  Am I getting it kind of right so far?

  • dead lark

    Como se dice.


    ¿Come se dice “moron” en Ingles?

    Aplicate el cuento.

  • dead lark

    Como se dice. 
     
     
    ¿Come se dice “moron” en Ingles? 
     
    Aplicate el cuento.

    題。


    你吃白痴說英文?

    應聘的故事。

  • dead lark

    Como se dice.  
      
      
    ¿Come se dice “moron” en Ingles?  
      
    Aplicate el cuento. 
     
    題。 
     
     
    你吃白痴說英文? 
     
    應聘的故事。

  • dead lark

    Como se dice.   
       
       
    ¿Como se dice “moron” en Ingles?   
       
    Aplicate el cuento.  
      
    題。  
      
      
    你吃白痴說英文?  
      
    應聘的故事。

  • Anonymous

    LD,

    So what is your point LD? New stress tests then what?

    Banks file financial reports with regulators and the financial market all the time. They are also heavily scrutinized and more intensely these days by the investment community every single day.

    More important is new financial regulation, which I am sure the Repugs will resist.

  • Onofre’s arm

    Moron! (the answer to your question)

    As long as we’re translating things, I’m beginning to wonder if “non sequitur” is Latin for “dead lark”.

  • Onofre’s arm

    Moron! (the answer to your question, and an accurate description of the person asking it.)

    As long as we’re translating things, I’m beginning to believe that “non sequitur” may be Latin for “dead lark”.

  • mortuus lark

    Como se dice.     
         
         
    ¿Como se dice “moron” en Ingles?     
         
    Aplicate el cuento.    
        
    題。    
        
        
    你吃白痴說英文?    
        
    應聘的故事。


    Who’s the moron now?

  • Murray

    I have a huge crush on Elizabeth Warren

  • Peggy Sue

    Could someone remove the “bird droppings” from this thread and others? 

    You can always tell when Obama is trouble–the Legion of Loonies hit the boards with their endless spew.   

  • oowawa

    Onofre’s arm, I’m beginning to suspect that “someone” has invented a new trojan horse computer virus designed specifically for infecting blog sites.  The algorithms in these programs can sound semi-human sometimes, but one flaw in the software is that they never sleep, and so can be distinguished from normal insane humans.

  • oowawa

    The particular trojan horse in question is now coming and disappearing like the cheshire cat, so noticing it at all is futile.

  • Sassy

    Thanks LD…uh, I guess.
    I saw Ms. Warren discussing the commercial real estate situation.
    Someone also mentioned that a bail-out is being discussed.
    Printing press operators will be fully employed running worthless money.

  • WestVirginia304

    Slightly on topic fun

  • Onofre’s arm

    And unfortunately, when a post disappears, the context for the subsequent responses also disappears. It becomes necessary to monitor previously posted responses and delete them when they answer questions or offer arguments to posts that no longer exist. This sucks!

  • oowawa

    Hilarious, WV304–thanks very much.  I kept waiting for Bob & Tom to sing a chorus about the huge “shit sandwich” that Obama-man inherited, and which he will devour until all the stink is gone . . .

  • Anonymous

    Onofre’s arm,

    You are correct in a strange way.  Here’s a link to sort of explain lark, dead or otherwise.

    http://www.philophysics.com/

    This is what I could find to explain the philosophy she says she follows.  It’s just another of those egocentric post modern streams of thought that are not grounded in any reality except to make its adherents think they’re smarter than the rest of the world.

    And yes, dead lark, we have sucked the chest of China dry and we are throwing a tantrum about it.  However we infants are not the ones who put this dependence on China in motion.  We are railing against it and asking for a return to our country’s ideals.

    The U.S. is the “good stepmother” of my grandparents, who emigrated from a Bolshevik Russia.  I wish to have my “good stepmother” revived and able to nourish us all again as she did when my grandparents came here.  And I am hopeful becaus I see it in the spirit of the common working man and woman in the U.S.

  • betty

    “She’s getting more air time and I hope that continues.  She appears to be one of the few honest voices out there right now”

    If that is true, why is she being given air time?  The MSM is not on our side, never think it is. 

  • betty

    I need to add, I like Elizabeth Warren.  I am just so wary of MSM.  Maybe they put her on thinking they could shout her down, or look a fool. 

  • oowawa

    I’ve wondered the same thing, betty.  How come they’re letting her talk at all?  It doesn’t compute, and I’m wary also.

  • Peggy Sue

    They didn’t shout her down on CSNBC yesterday, Betty.  They tried to talk over her but she was persistent.  Right now, she’s getting more face time on TV.  But I’ve been reading her in print.  This is one smart lady, who has a true talent in breaking complex issues down and explaining them in intelligible language.  That’s both a talent and a service because these thugsters have been hiding behind finance-speak, anything to keep the truth of what they’ve done and continue to do behind a tattered veil of legitmacy.

    But you’re quite right, the media is not our friend.

  • mortuus lark

    Proof that the cause of America’s problems are its infant citizens.

    Sen. Durbin’s comments:

    “I am convinced that infants born in Washington, D.C., are taken from the arms of their loving mothers right when they are born into a room where someone shows a film of a snowstorm with shrieking and screaming so that those children come to believe snow is a mortal enemy, like a nuclear attack, because I have seen, for over 40 years here, people in this town go into a full-scale panic at the thought of a snowfall.”

  • AC

    Obamaman
    This is great WV304, glad I took some time to check in.  Laughter truly is reinvigorating, now I feel energized and back to the great outdoors.

  • EllenD

    To comment on the original topic, yesterday I heard that THE ANGRY PUBLIC was the cause of credit drying up because banks feared increased regulation and therefore are afraid to lend to anyone who isn’t AAA. That position isn’t new because banks traditionally only want to lend money to people who don’t need it.
    But I never heard before that it was all MY FAULT!

  • oowawa

    Yes, EllenD.  the poor bankers are scared ‘cuz the Angry Public, whipped into a frenzy by, oh, you know, the frenzy whippers, are outside the banks with torches and pitchforks threatening increased regulation and suchlike; and now they’ve locked their vaults and are going to withhold credit, and we are all very horny and slavering for credit.  Yep, it’s pitiful to think of Goldman Sachs executives cowering in the corner, bullied by the chanting mob outside . . .

    And it’s all your fault, EllenD!

  • oowawa

    Yes, EllenD.  the poor bankers are scared ‘cuz the Angry Public, whipped into a frenzy by, oh, you know, the frenzy whippers, are outside the banks with torches and pitchforks threatening increased regulation and suchlike; and now they’ve locked their vaults and are going to withhold credit, and we are all very horny and slavering for credit.  Yep, it’s pitiful to think of Goldman Sachs executives cowering in the corner, bullied by the chanting mob outside . . . 
     
    And it’s all your fault, EllenD!

  • Anonymous

    And yes, I know she read this because she deleted her little poem to what she thought was our stupidity in the comment stream in the post below.  It takes someone quite unsure of herself not to stand by what she has previously typed.  She didn’t think anyone could translate her little poem.  I just refuled to answer it there, and I won’t ever directly answer her little tantrums.

  • oowawa

    Oh, and here’s what we’re chanting that has them shaking in their suits:

    GLASS STEAGALL!
    GLASS STEAGALL!
    GLASS STEAGALL!
    WHAT DO WE WANT?
    GLASS STEAGALL!

  • oowawa

    According to this article about the repeal of parts of the Glass Steagall Act:

    The repeal enabled commercial lenders such as Citigroup, which was in 1999 the largest U.S. bank by assets, to underwrite and trade instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations and establish so-called structured investment vehicles, or SIVs, that bought those securities.[15] Elizabeth Warren,[16] author and one of the five outside experts who constitute the Congressional Oversight Panel of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, has said that the repeal of this act contributed to the Global financial crisis of 2008–2009,

  • EllenD

    I take full responsibility for this oowawa, which means, in this day and age, that there will be no repercussions that will affect me in any way. And I’m free to do it again! :-P

    To be fair to Barbara Boxer – she voted against the repeal.

  • an observer

    Can you say “derivatives”?
    It ain’t over. Watch Europe. Not Greece, Spain!
    Greek discussion is misdirection while they scamble to stop the wave.
    The collapse is happening now.