Comments on: Inconvenient Facts Drown Al Gore’s “Truths” [UPDATE] http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/ Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Scottar http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1321235 Scottar Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:14:28 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1321235 Well Larry, the shoe fits both feet: Although David Rose exaggerated Jones response Tim Lambert  is also a spinster. He has a clear bias against deniers. Take his referenced temp graph from GISS: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/02/daily_mail_caught_in_another_l.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scienceblogs%2Fdeltoid+%28Deltoid%29 We have very peculiar temperature adjustments by National and Global Data Centers: http://www.intellicast.com/Community/Content.aspx?ref=rss&a=212 Then their's the history of climate hysteria: http://www.examiner.com/x-32936-Seminole-County-Environmental-News-Examiner~y2010m3d2-Arctic-Ocean-is-warming-icebergs-growing-s This climate change hysteria has been around a lot longer then Gore or Hansen. Well

Larry, the shoe fits both feet:

Although David Rose exaggerated Jones response Tim Lambert  is also a spinster. He has a clear bias against deniers. Take his referenced temp graph from GISS:

http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/02/daily_mail_caught_in_another_l.php?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scienceblogs%2Fdeltoid+%28Deltoid%29

We have very peculiar temperature adjustments by National and Global Data Centers:

http://www.intellicast.com/Community/Content.aspx?ref=rss&a=212

Then their’s the history of climate hysteria:

http://www.examiner.com/x-32936-Seminole-County-Environmental-News-Examiner~y2010m3d2-Arctic-Ocean-is-warming-icebergs-growing-s

This climate change hysteria has been around a lot longer then Gore or Hansen.

]]> By: Noogan http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1317518 Noogan Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:44:15 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1317518 Yet, Ferd Berfle, you have no problem whatsoever with Larry calling people a "brain dead retard" just for disagreeing with him! That makes you a hypocrite, and your hypocrisy certainly makes me consider your opinion with complete contempt. Yet, Ferd Berfle, you have no problem whatsoever with Larry calling people a “brain dead retard” just for disagreeing with him!

That makes you a hypocrite, and your hypocrisy certainly makes me consider your opinion with complete contempt.

]]> By: Benefits of Strength Training | http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1288973 Benefits of Strength Training | Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:43:35 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1288973 [...] Inconvenient Facts Drown Al Gore's “Truths” [UPDATE] : NO QUARTER [...] [...] Inconvenient Facts Drown Al Gore's “Truths” [UPDATE] : NO QUARTER [...]

]]> By: whoframedrudy http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314864 whoframedrudy Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:49:28 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314864 "Oh, my God, you people are so pathetic" Cindy was referring to the hype surrounding the movie. That would be obvious to anyone who's brain wasn't swollen with hysteria. And yes, as Obama has proven, there is a strong correlation between hype and bullshit. “Oh, my God, you people are so pathetic”
Cindy was referring to the hype surrounding the movie. That would be obvious to anyone who’s brain wasn’t swollen with hysteria.
And yes, as Obama has proven, there is a strong correlation between hype and bullshit.

]]> By: MrX http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314777 MrX Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:41:19 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314777 My favourite part about the AGW hoax was the software that let you enter any data, even random data, and the hockey stick figure would come out every time. Tell me again this isn't a hoax! My favourite part about the AGW hoax was the software that let you enter any data, even random data, and the hockey stick figure would come out every time.

Tell me again this isn’t a hoax!

]]> By: Not Likely http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314679 Not Likely Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:24:00 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314679 What an incredibly stupid post. What an incredibly stupid post.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314464 Anonymous Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:40:43 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314464 <em> </em> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_FEPvXxQDA" rel="nofollow"></a>

]]> By: No Longer Banned in Beantown http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314458 No Longer Banned in Beantown Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:46:00 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314458 What I know from college physics and geology is that if the greenhouse gases were going to warm the earth as much as the alarmists say, the earth would have become an oven long ago from water vapor. Water vaper is more efficient at trapping heat than the "greenhouse gases", and water vapor makes up greater than 10,000 times more of the atmosphere than the greenhouse gases added by man. What I know from college physics and geology is that if the greenhouse gases were going to warm the earth as much as the alarmists say, the earth would have become an oven long ago from water vapor.

Water vaper is more efficient at trapping heat than the “greenhouse gases”, and water vapor makes up greater than 10,000 times more of the atmosphere than the greenhouse gases added by man.

]]> By: No Longer Banned in Beantown http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314457 No Longer Banned in Beantown Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:38:47 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314457 Ditto that. I had bio, chem, and physics in college. How about you Gore? Gore was busy inventing the internet. Ditto that. I had bio, chem, and physics in college. How about you Gore?

Gore was busy inventing the internet.

]]> By: CrisisMaven http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314330 CrisisMaven Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:38:16 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314330 As I see you are dealing with statistical research: I have put one of the most comprehensive link lists for hundreds of thousands of statistical sources and indicators on my blog: <a href="http://crisismaven.wordpress.com/references/">Statistics Reference List</a>. And what I find most fascinating is how data can be visualised nowadays with the graphical computing power of modern PCs, as in many of the dozens of examples in these <a href="http://crisismaven.wordpress.com/references/references-subjects-covered/data-structuring/data-visualisation-references/">Data Visualisation References</a>. If you miss anything that I might be able to find for you or if you yourself want to share a resource, please leave a comment. As I see you are dealing with statistical research: I have put one of the most comprehensive link lists for hundreds of thousands of statistical sources and indicators on my blog: <a href=”http://crisismaven.wordpress.com/references/”>Statistics Reference List</a>. And what I find most fascinating is how data can be visualised nowadays with the graphical computing power of modern PCs, as in many of the dozens of examples in these <a href=”http://crisismaven.wordpress.com/references/references-subjects-covered/data-structuring/data-visualisation-references/”>Data Visualisation References</a>. If you miss anything that I might be able to find for you or if you yourself want to share a resource, please leave a comment.

]]> By: Somethin' or Other http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314240 Somethin' or Other Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:25:12 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314240 Larry Johnson channeling Jim Inhofe. Neither one of them know a damn thing about science: http://www.skepticalscience.com/Senator-Inhofe-attempt-to-distract-from-scientific-realities-of-global-warming.html See Also: http://www.ossfoundation.us/ http://www.ossfoundation.us/the-leading-edge/projects/environment/global-warming/myths http://www.skepticalscience.com/Comparing-IPCC-projections-to-observations.html Global Warming is Real http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-cooling.htm Humans are causing global warming http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm Larry Johnson channeling Jim Inhofe. Neither one of them know a damn thing about science:

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Senator-Inhofe-attempt-to-distract-from-scientific-realities-of-global-warming.html
See Also:
http://www.ossfoundation.us/
http://www.ossfoundation.us/the-leading-edge/projects/environment/global-warming/myths
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Comparing-IPCC-projections-to-observations.html
Global Warming is Real
http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-cooling.htm
Humans are causing global warming
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm

]]> By: Noogan http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314231 Noogan Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:12:05 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314231 Shut the fuck up you fucking fuck.  There, I feel so much better, Bria. I'm sure you think you've made an argument here, but really, all you've done is expose yourself as a fucking idiot with a mouth full of sewage.  And, by the way, scientific evidence is overwhelming; global warming is real; humans are contributing to it; and Larry Johnson is a pompous blowhard.  Shut the fuck up you fucking fuck. 

There, I feel so much better, Bria. I’m sure you think you’ve made an argument here, but really, all you’ve done is expose yourself as a fucking idiot with a mouth full of sewage. 

And, by the way, scientific evidence is overwhelming; global warming is real; humans are contributing to it; and Larry Johnson is a pompous blowhard. 

]]> By: Noogan http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314227 Noogan Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:09:21 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314227 They didn't "fudge the numbers" at all. If you actually read the reports, you'd know that these emails have been taken completely out of context and this issue blown out of all logical proportion.  Al Gore is right; Larry Johnson is a fathead.  They didn’t “fudge the numbers” at all. If you actually read the reports, you’d know that these emails have been taken completely out of context and this issue blown out of all logical proportion. 

Al Gore is right; Larry Johnson is a fathead. 

]]> By: Noogan http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314225 Noogan Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:07:55 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314225 The data is clear and irrefutable. Humans are contributing to global warming, and global warming is contributing to climate change overall.  Only a MORON like Larry Johnson--who knows NOTHING ABOUT THE SCIENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING--would think he has the right to dispute the overwhelming scientific consensus on this.  Larry is nothing but a pompous blowhard.  The data is clear and irrefutable. Humans are contributing to global warming, and global warming is contributing to climate change overall. 

Only a MORON like Larry Johnson–who knows NOTHING ABOUT THE SCIENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING–would think he has the right to dispute the overwhelming scientific consensus on this. 

Larry is nothing but a pompous blowhard. 

]]> By: Onofre's arm http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42630/inconvenient-facts-for-al-gores-boondoggle/#comment-1314077 Onofre's arm Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:42:59 +0000 http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42630#comment-1314077 Donjo, you're an imbecile. In disciplines like geology, climate change, landscape evolution, etc., studies that are 5 years old are NOT considered outdated. The processes that we're considering in these discussion are often measured in centuries, millennium, epochs, and eons. The fact that you've discarded as "outdated" a study that spans 45 years of changes in worldwide ice inventory that is ONLY five years old, demonstrates that you are way out of your league in the realm of science. But you're just a member a large group of people who have absolutely zero scientific training, yet they still cling to the boneheaded notions of AGW warmaggedon based only on the increasingly debunked findings and urban myths that represent the warmist version of reality, as though you and your army of ignorant buddies somehow intimately understand the complexities and countless influences involved with climate. The articles that YOU present as proof are laughable interpretations by writers who gathered together anecdotal evidence without any citations to objective scientific findings, they're worthless. The claim that the Woods Hole scientists had never seen such big chunks breaking off the Greenland ice sheet, while being interesting, is NOT a scientific finding, it's an observation. The fact that they've never seen it before is more than likely because they never looked before. The events they describe could have been going on sporadically for thousands of years, but only very recently have people been to such remote parts of the world to witness them. Active volcanoes under the oceans are spewing billions of tons of magma as I write, but there are only a very few examples of actual film footage of such events. Just because we don't have massive volumes of evidence of such events, in no way means they're not happening with relative frequency. The fact that we are now "witnessing" the events in Greenland, doesn't mean that they haven't been happening, to some degree, for centuries. In fact, there is evidence that a recent increase of under water volcanic activity in the Arctic, is the cause for the isolated melting referred to in your article. Is mankind responsible for volcanic activity donjo?  At the risk of using the "C" word, the current "consensus" is that global temperatures have been either stabilized, or they've been dropping slightly, for the past 15 years, so don't bother me with the stupid claim that the melting has significantly increased in the last FIVE YEARS due to AGW, because even if you believe in AGW, it hasn't been happening. So, if you want to cling to the ridiculous notion that there has been a significant increase in ice melts in Antarctica and Greenland, you can eliminate AGW, and look elsewhere for the cause. Donjo, you’re an imbecile. In disciplines like geology, climate change, landscape evolution, etc., studies that are 5 years old are NOT considered outdated. The processes that we’re considering in these discussion are often measured in centuries, millennium, epochs, and eons. The fact that you’ve discarded as “outdated” a study that spans 45 years of changes in worldwide ice inventory that is ONLY five years old, demonstrates that you are way out of your league in the realm of science. But you’re just a member a large group of people who have absolutely zero scientific training, yet they still cling to the boneheaded notions of AGW warmaggedon based only on the increasingly debunked findings and urban myths that represent the warmist version of reality, as though you and your army of ignorant buddies somehow intimately understand the complexities and countless influences involved with climate.

The articles that YOU present as proof are laughable interpretations by writers who gathered together anecdotal evidence without any citations to objective scientific findings, they’re worthless. The claim that the Woods Hole scientists had never seen such big chunks breaking off the Greenland ice sheet, while being interesting, is NOT a scientific finding, it’s an observation. The fact that they’ve never seen it before is more than likely because they never looked before. The events they describe could have been going on sporadically for thousands of years, but only very recently have people been to such remote parts of the world to witness them. Active volcanoes under the oceans are spewing billions of tons of magma as I write, but there are only a very few examples of actual film footage of such events. Just because we don’t have massive volumes of evidence of such events, in no way means they’re not happening with relative frequency. The fact that we are now “witnessing” the events in Greenland, doesn’t mean that they haven’t been happening, to some degree, for centuries. In fact, there is evidence that a recent increase of under water volcanic activity in the Arctic, is the cause for the isolated melting referred to in your article. Is mankind responsible for volcanic activity donjo? 

At the risk of using the “C” word, the current “consensus” is that global temperatures have been either stabilized, or they’ve been dropping slightly, for the past 15 years, so don’t bother me with the stupid claim that the melting has significantly increased in the last FIVE YEARS due to AGW, because even if you believe in AGW, it hasn’t been happening. So, if you want to cling to the ridiculous notion that there has been a significant increase in ice melts in Antarctica and Greenland, you can eliminate AGW, and look elsewhere for the cause.

]]>