<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hooray for Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: candy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1317052</link>
		<dc:creator>candy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1317052</guid>
		<description>Not sure if you&#039;re coming back to read or respond to this but I must ask: So what is result is it that you prefer? However much you disapprove of the &quot;Academy&quot;, when a woman director succeeds in making the best film of the year, shall the Academy vote for her to win, in which case they&#039;ll be accused of being PC, or not vote for her to win, in which case they are gender discrimminating?

I&#039;m not trying to defend the Academy, but I don&#039;t know what they can do without offending one way or another, short of women stop directing films altogether, in which case the issue goes away on its own entirely.&#160; Should women like Bigelow stop making films so that the Academy won&#039;t get to be PC? If you are an Academy member and you honestly believe she made the best film and want to vote her to win, how should you vote so that you support her but at the same time not be &quot;PC&quot;? Pray tell. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if you&#8217;re coming back to read or respond to this but I must ask: So what is result is it that you prefer? However much you disapprove of the &#8220;Academy&#8221;, when a woman director succeeds in making the best film of the year, shall the Academy vote for her to win, in which case they&#8217;ll be accused of being PC, or not vote for her to win, in which case they are gender discrimminating?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to defend the Academy, but I don&#8217;t know what they can do without offending one way or another, short of women stop directing films altogether, in which case the issue goes away on its own entirely.&nbsp; Should women like Bigelow stop making films so that the Academy won&#8217;t get to be PC? If you are an Academy member and you honestly believe she made the best film and want to vote her to win, how should you vote so that you support her but at the same time not be &#8220;PC&#8221;? Pray tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EllenD</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316352</link>
		<dc:creator>EllenD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316352</guid>
		<description>It was snark. Lighten up. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was snark. Lighten up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oowawa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316339</link>
		<dc:creator>oowawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316339</guid>
		<description>Guest, this is a beautiful example of what is called beating up a straw-man, or in this case, a straw-bunny. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guest, this is a beautiful example of what is called beating up a straw-man, or in this case, a straw-bunny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oowawa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316336</link>
		<dc:creator>oowawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316336</guid>
		<description>Speciesist Pig! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speciesist Pig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alibe</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316335</link>
		<dc:creator>Alibe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316335</guid>
		<description>I saw The Hurt Locker on DVD.&#160; I wished I had seen it in a theater.&#160; It was really good, but I thiught seeing that in a theater would have added to the movie.&#160; Loved &quot;Up In The Air&quot;...on many many levels.&#160; It may have been the best movie...subtle, complex, funny, poignant, political, apolitical, POWERFUL! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw The Hurt Locker on DVD.&nbsp; I wished I had seen it in a theater.&nbsp; It was really good, but I thiught seeing that in a theater would have added to the movie.&nbsp; Loved &#8220;Up In The Air&#8221;&#8230;on many many levels.&nbsp; It may have been the best movie&#8230;subtle, complex, funny, poignant, political, apolitical, POWERFUL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316334</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316334</guid>
		<description>Oh, and &quot;the Academy&quot; is not responsible for acceptance speeches. &#160;You seem to forget too that when Michael Moore rubbished George Bush during his &quot;Bowling for Columbine&quot; acceptance the audience, which I&#039;m pretty sure was made up 99.9% of liberals, booed him. &#160;So I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about. And I agree you should refrain from throwing around opinions about movies you haven&#039;t seen. &#160;THL is an excellent film and your comments about that &quot;woman&quot; business is as sexist as any of Chris Matthews&#039; suggestions that Hillary won the Senate seat because people felt sorry for her. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and &#8220;the Academy&#8221; is not responsible for acceptance speeches. &nbsp;You seem to forget too that when Michael Moore rubbished George Bush during his &#8220;Bowling for Columbine&#8221; acceptance the audience, which I&#8217;m pretty sure was made up 99.9% of liberals, booed him. &nbsp;So I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about. And I agree you should refrain from throwing around opinions about movies you haven&#8217;t seen. &nbsp;THL is an excellent film and your comments about that &#8220;woman&#8221; business is as sexist as any of Chris Matthews&#8217; suggestions that Hillary won the Senate seat because people felt sorry for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316333</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316333</guid>
		<description>Owowawa: &#160;maybe the Academy could put your mind at ease by only awarding the Oscar to men who produce box office hits or movies that don&#039;t offend anyone or require, god forbid, thought. &#160;Or to Glenn Beck and that faux &quot;pimp&quot; and G.Gordon Liddy wannabe James O&#039;Keefe. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owowawa: &nbsp;maybe the Academy could put your mind at ease by only awarding the Oscar to men who produce box office hits or movies that don&#8217;t offend anyone or require, god forbid, thought. &nbsp;Or to Glenn Beck and that faux &#8220;pimp&#8221; and G.Gordon Liddy wannabe James O&#8217;Keefe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316326</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316326</guid>
		<description>No one accused you of being a racist. Project much? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one accused you of being a racist. Project much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316311</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316311</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care what anyone says:&#160; Sigourney Weaver looked hot in her avatar body with the LL Bean shorts and the tank top,&#160; I would gladly link tails with her any time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care what anyone says:&nbsp; Sigourney Weaver looked hot in her avatar body with the LL Bean shorts and the tank top,&nbsp; I would gladly link tails with her any time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoframedrudy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316307</link>
		<dc:creator>whoframedrudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316307</guid>
		<description>And as I pointed out above, he just doesn&#039;t choose strong-willed women. He depicts strong women in his movies -- and uses all his film-making skills to associate women with power, using the cinematic language men relate to.

In one shot in The Abyss, a helicopter lands on an oil drilling platform. &#160;Cameron frames the shot so you only see the combat boots of three Navy SEALs getting of the copter--and then a woman&#039;s high heel shoes. &#160;It turns out the woman was the engineer who built the oil rig.

In Aliens, a male commando teases a woman commando, &#039;have you ever been mistaken for a man?&#039; &#160;The woman snaps back, &quot;No. &#160;Have you?&quot; &#160;I can&#039;t tell you how that works on the male psyche. &#160;And Cameron knew exactly what he&#039;s doing. &#160;I saw Aliens with my 12-year-old nephew and neither of us could get over that &#039;lady marine.&#039;

I remember how, when I was a child, the depiction of women as weak and fearful, always screaming and weak in movies affected my attitudes. &#160;They may just be dumb action movies, but Cameron was doing really radical, transformational things with gender imagery. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And as I pointed out above, he just doesn&#8217;t choose strong-willed women. He depicts strong women in his movies &#8212; and uses all his film-making skills to associate women with power, using the cinematic language men relate to.</p>
<p>In one shot in The Abyss, a helicopter lands on an oil drilling platform. &nbsp;Cameron frames the shot so you only see the combat boots of three Navy SEALs getting of the copter&#8211;and then a woman&#8217;s high heel shoes. &nbsp;It turns out the woman was the engineer who built the oil rig.</p>
<p>In Aliens, a male commando teases a woman commando, &#8216;have you ever been mistaken for a man?&#8217; &nbsp;The woman snaps back, &#8220;No. &nbsp;Have you?&#8221; &nbsp;I can&#8217;t tell you how that works on the male psyche. &nbsp;And Cameron knew exactly what he&#8217;s doing. &nbsp;I saw Aliens with my 12-year-old nephew and neither of us could get over that &#8216;lady marine.&#8217;</p>
<p>I remember how, when I was a child, the depiction of women as weak and fearful, always screaming and weak in movies affected my attitudes. &nbsp;They may just be dumb action movies, but Cameron was doing really radical, transformational things with gender imagery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athena the Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316306</link>
		<dc:creator>Athena the Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316306</guid>
		<description>Keep holding your breath. &#160;Why would she do something like that? Kathryn Bigelow has spent her whole career working to be simply a Director. &#160;Not a &lt;i&gt;woman &lt;/i&gt;Director but simply a Director. &#160;Bravo for her.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep holding your breath. &nbsp;Why would she do something like that? Kathryn Bigelow has spent her whole career working to be simply a Director. &nbsp;Not a <i>woman </i>Director but simply a Director. &nbsp;Bravo for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athena the Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316303</link>
		<dc:creator>Athena the Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316303</guid>
		<description>Rose in Titanic (the simply wonderful Kate Winslet) became a very strong independent woman which wasn&#039;t all that easy for her times. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose in Titanic (the simply wonderful Kate Winslet) became a very strong independent woman which wasn&#8217;t all that easy for her times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oowawa</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316299</link>
		<dc:creator>oowawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316299</guid>
		<description>Candy, first of all, I assume that she made a wonderful powerful movie; I won&#039;t watch it because realistic war movies make me feel horrible.&#160; I don&#039;t disrespect her work at all.&#160; I disrespect the Academy, and the motives they have, which may very well be unconscious.&#160; Note that there wasn&#039;t hardly any political innuendo in these Awards.&#160; Hollywood was largely in the bag for Obama at Hillary&#039;s expense.&#160; Remember Sean Penn&#039;s fawning about &quot;that elegant man.&quot;&#160; Might there have been some collective guilt to expiate?&#160; Maybe so, maybe not.&#160; Perhaps it was time for a woman to win.&#160; I think maybe that was in the air.&#160; Or so I think.

Incidentally, IMHO, District 9 is one of the worst critically praised movies ever made, and only works if you think of it as a comedy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candy, first of all, I assume that she made a wonderful powerful movie; I won&#8217;t watch it because realistic war movies make me feel horrible.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t disrespect her work at all.&nbsp; I disrespect the Academy, and the motives they have, which may very well be unconscious.&nbsp; Note that there wasn&#8217;t hardly any political innuendo in these Awards.&nbsp; Hollywood was largely in the bag for Obama at Hillary&#8217;s expense.&nbsp; Remember Sean Penn&#8217;s fawning about &#8220;that elegant man.&#8221;&nbsp; Might there have been some collective guilt to expiate?&nbsp; Maybe so, maybe not.&nbsp; Perhaps it was time for a woman to win.&nbsp; I think maybe that was in the air.&nbsp; Or so I think.</p>
<p>Incidentally, IMHO, District 9 is one of the worst critically praised movies ever made, and only works if you think of it as a comedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoframedrudy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316283</link>
		<dc:creator>whoframedrudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316283</guid>
		<description>Actually, Gale Anne Hurd produced Terminator. &#160;It looks to me like Cameron is attracted to power women. &#160;And he depicts powerful women in all his movies: &#160;my goodness, Ripley and Vasquez in Aliens and Sarah Connor were the first ultra-badass women I ever saw in the movies. &#160;Mastrontonio in The Abyss. &#160;This may sound primitive and silly, but as an American male programmed to worship the Terminator, I can tell you it was liberating to find myself rooting for a female action hero. &#160;To me, Cameron is a great feminist director, but I guess that&#039;s the American cavemale&#039;s definition of feminism. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Gale Anne Hurd produced Terminator. &nbsp;It looks to me like Cameron is attracted to power women. &nbsp;And he depicts powerful women in all his movies: &nbsp;my goodness, Ripley and Vasquez in Aliens and Sarah Connor were the first ultra-badass women I ever saw in the movies. &nbsp;Mastrontonio in The Abyss. &nbsp;This may sound primitive and silly, but as an American male programmed to worship the Terminator, I can tell you it was liberating to find myself rooting for a female action hero. &nbsp;To me, Cameron is a great feminist director, but I guess that&#8217;s the American cavemale&#8217;s definition of feminism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorac</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/42872/hooray-for-hollywood-2/#comment-1316279</link>
		<dc:creator>lorac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=42872#comment-1316279</guid>
		<description>lol </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

