RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Bret Baier, Yowza! [Video & Transcript Updates]

VIDEO #1: Fox News Exclusive: President Obama
Part 1: The president sits down with FNC’s Bret Baier to discuss the health care reform bill
(Part 2 and the transcript are below the fold.)

Finally, a journalist with some balls who can ask tough questions. I’m watching Bret Baier’s interview of the Holy One. Baer puts to shame the softball interview that Bill O’Reilly did two years ago. Baier is making him sweat and Obama is struggling. We’ll post the video link when it becomes available (and if you find it, let us know).

VIDEO #2: FNC Exclusive: President Obama
Part 2: The president talks foreign policy with Fox News

Comment away.

Here’s the transcript:

This is a rush transcript of “Special Report With Bret Baier” from March 17, 2010. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

BRET BAIER, “SPECIAL REPORT” HOST: Welcome to Washington. I’m Bret Baier, and this is a special edition of “Special Report”, beginning tonight in the Blue Room in the White House, mid-way through what many people are calling the most pivotal week of his presidency so far. We are interviewing President Barack Obama.

Mr. President, thank you for the time.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Thank you for having me, Bret.

BAIER: You have said at least four times in the past two weeks: “the United States Congress owes the American people a final up or down vote on health care.” So do you support the use of this Slaughter rule? The deem and pass rule, so that Democrats avoid a straight up or down vote on the Senate bill?

OBAMA: Here’s what I think is going to happen and what should happen. You now have a proposal from me that will be in legislation, that has the toughest insurance reforms in history, makes sure that people are able to get insurance even if they’ve got preexisting conditions, makes sure that we are reducing costs for families and small businesses, by allowing them to buy into a pool, the same kind of pool that members of Congress have.

We know that this is going to reduce the deficit by over a trillion dollars. So you’ve got a good package, in terms of substance. I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or the Senate.

(CROSS TALK)

OBAMA: What I can tell you is that the vote that’s taken in the House will be a vote for health care reform. And if people vote yes, whatever form that takes, that is going to be a vote for health care reform. And I don’t think we should pretend otherwise.

(CROSS TALK)

OBAMA: Bret, let me finish. If they don’t, if they vote against, then they’re going to be voting against health care reform and they’re going to be voting in favor of the status quo. So Washington gets very concerned about these procedural issues in Congress. This is always an issue that’s — whether Republicans are in charge or Democrats in charge — when Republicans are in charge, Democrats constantly complain that the majority was not giving them an opportunity, et cetera.

BAIER: Let me insert this. We asked our viewers to e-mail in suggested questions. More than 18,000 people took time to e-mail us questions. These are regular people from all over the country. Lee Johnson, from Spring Valley, California: “If the bill is so good for all of us, why all the intimidation, arm twisting, seedy deals, and parliamentary trickery necessary to pass a bill, when you have an overwhelming majority in both houses and the presidency?”

Sandy Moody in Chesterfield, Missouri: “If the health care bill is so wonderful, why do you have to bribe Congress to pass it?”

OBAMA: Bret, I get 40,000 letters or e-mails a day.

BAIER: I know.

OBAMA: I could read the exact same e-mail —

BAIER: These are people. It’s not just Washington punditry.

OBAMA: I’ve got the exact same e-mails, that I could show you, that talk about why haven’t we done something to make sure that I, a small business person, am getting as good a deal as members of Congress are getting, and don’t have my insurance rates jacked up 40 percent? Why is it that I, a mother with a child with a preexisting condition, still can’t get insurance?

So the issue that I’m concerned about is whether not we’re fixing a broken system.

BAIER: OK, back to the original question.

OBAMA: The key is to make sure that we vote — we have a vote on whether or not we’re going to maintain the status quo, or whether we’re going to reform the system.

BAIER: So you support the deem and pass rule?

OBAMA: I am not —

BAIER: You’re saying that’s that vote.

OBAMA: What I’m saying is whatever they end up voting on — and I hope it’s going to be sometime this week — that it is going to be a vote for or against my health care proposal. That’s what matters. That’s what ultimately people are going to judge this on.

If people don’t believe in health care reform — and I think there are definitely a lot of people who are worried about whether or not these changes are, in some fashion, going to affect them adversely. And I think those are legitimate concerns on the substance — then somebody who votes for this bill, they’re going to be judged at the polls. And the same is going to be true if they vote against it.

BAIER: Monday in Ohio, you called for courage in the health care debate. At the same time, House Speaker Pelosi was saying this to reporters about the deem and pass rule: “I like it, this scenario, because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.” Is that the kind of courage that you’re talking about?

OBAMA: Well, here’s what’s taking place — we both know what’s going on. You’ve got a Senate bill that was passed, that had provisions that needed to be changed. Right? People were concerned about, for example, the fix that only fixed Nebraska, and didn’t fix the rest of the states.

Now, a lot of the members of the House legitimately say, we want to vote on a package, as the president has proposed, that has those fixes embedded in it. Now that may mean they have to sequence the votes. But the ultimate vote they’re taking is on whether or not they believe in the proposal that I put forward, to make sure that insurance reform is fixed, to make sure the deficits are reduced, and premiums go down, and small businesses are helped. That’s what they’re concerned about.

BAIER: Do you know which specific deals are in or out, as of today?

OBAMA: I am certain that we’ve made sure, for example, that any burdens on states are alleviated, when it comes to what they’re going to have to chip in to make sure that we’re giving subsidies to small businesses, and subsidies to individuals, for example.

BAIER: So the Connecticut deal is still in?

OBAMA: So that’s not — that’s not going to be something that is going to be in this final package. I think the same is true on all of these provisions. I’ll give you some exceptions though.

Something that was called a special deal was for Louisiana. It was said that there were billions — millions of dollars going to Louisiana, this was a special deal. Well, in fact, that provision, which I think should remain in, said that if a state has been affected by a natural catastrophe, that has created a special health care emergency in that state, they should get help. Louisiana, obviously, went through Katrina, and they’re still trying to deal with the enormous challenges that were faced because of that.

(CROSS TALK)

OBAMA: That also — I’m giving you an example of one that I consider important. It also affects Hawaii, which went through an earthquake. So that’s not just a Louisiana provision. That is a provision that affects every state that is going through a natural catastrophe.

Now I have said that there are certain provisions, like this Nebraska one, that don’t make sense. And they needed to be out. And we have removed those. So, at the end of the day, what people are going to be able to say is that this legislation is going to be providing help to small businesses and individuals, across the board, in an even handed way, and providing people relief from a status quo that’s just not working.

BAIER: OK, the Florida deal, in or out?

OBAMA: The Florida deal —

BAIER: Paying for Medicare Advantage, exempting 800,000 Floridians from —

OBAMA: My understanding is that whatever is going to be done on Medicare is going to apply across the board to all states.

BAIER: Connecticut, Montana — there are a lot of deals in here, Mr. President, that people have issues about.

OBAMA: Bret, the core of this bill is going to be affecting every American family. If you have insurance, you’re going to be able to keep it. If you don’t have insurance, you’re going to be able to buy into a pool, like members of Congress have. We’re going to make sure that we have delivery system reforms that strengthen Medicare, that are going to make sure that doctors and hospitals are providing better service and better care, and this is going to reduce the deficit.

Now, there are going to be in this, as I just mentioned, on things like making sure that states who have gone through natural catastrophes and medical emergencies are getting help, but those are not going to ones that are driven by politics, they’re going to be driven policy.

BAIER: Couple more process things, quickly.

You said a few times as Senator Obama that if a president has to eke out a victory of 50 plus one, that on something as important as health care, “you can’t govern.” But now you’re embracing a 50 plus one reconciliation process in the Senate, so do you feel like you can govern after this?

OBAMA: Well, Bret, the — I think what we’ve seen during the course of this year is that we have come up with a bill that basically tracks the recommendations of Tom Daschle, former Democratic senator and leader, but also Bob Dole, former Republican leader, Howard Baker, former Republican leader. The ideas embodied in this legislation are not left, they’re not right, they are — they are —

BAIER: I understand what you’re — I know you don’t like to talk about process, but there are a lot of questions in these 18,000 that talk about process.

OBAMA: I understand being —

(CROSSTALK)

BAIER: And there are a lot of people around America that have a problem with this process.

OBAMA: Bret, I —

BAIER: You called it an ugly process just last month.

OBAMA: I’ve got to tell — I’ve got to say to you, there are a lot more people who are concerned about the fact that they may be losing their house or going bankrupt because of health care.

BAIER: OK, so we have —

OBAMA: And so — so the — look —

BAIER: Deem and passed, Senate reconciliation and we don’t know exactly what’s in the fix bill. Do you still think —

OBAMA: No, we will — by the time the vote has taken place, not only I will know what’s in it, you’ll know what’s in it because it’s going to be posted and everybody’s going to be able to able to evaluate it on the merits.

But here’s the thing, Bret, I mean, the reason that I think this conversation ends up being a little frustrating is because the focus entirely is on Washington process. And yes, I have said that is an ugly process. It was ugly when Republicans were in charge, it was ugly were in Democrats were in charge.

BAIER: This is one-sixth of the U.S. economy, though, sir. One-sixth.

OBAMA: And, Bret, let me tell you something, the fact of the matter is that for the vast majority of people, their health care is not going to change because right now they’re getting a better deal. The only thing that is going to change for them is is that they’re going to have more security under their insurance and they’re going to have a better situation when it comes to if they lose their job, heaven forbid, or somebody gets sick with a preexisting condition, they’ll have more security. But, so — so —

BAIER: So how can you —

OBAMA: — the notion that —

BAIER: — guarantee that they’re not going to —

OBAMA: — so but —

BAIER: — they’re going to be able to keep their doctor —

OBAMA: Bret, you’ve got to let me finish my answers —

BAIER: Sir, I know you don’t like to filibuster, but —

OBAMA: Well, I’m trying to answer your question and you keep on interrupting. So let me be clear.

Now, you keep on repeating the notion that it’s one-sixth of the economy. Yes, it’s one-sixth of the economy, but we’re not transforming one-sixth of the economy all in one fell swoop. What we’re saying is is that for the vast majority of people who have health care, they’re going to be able to keep it. But what we are saying is that we should have some basic protections from insurance company abuses and that in order for us to do that, we are going to have to make some changes in the status quo that we’ve been debating for a year.

This notion that this has been not transparent, that people don’t know what’s in the bill, everybody knows what’s in the bill. I sat for seven hours with —

BAIER: Mr. President, you couldn’t tell me what the special deals are that are in or not today.

OBAMA: I just told you what was in and what was not in.

BAIER: Is Connecticut in?

OBAMA: Connecticut — what are you specifically referring to?

BAIER: The $100 million for the hospital? Is Montana in for the asbestos program? Is — you know, listen, there are people — this is real money, people are worried about this stuff.

OBAMA: And as I said before, this — the final provisions are going to be posted for many days before this thing passes, but —

BAIER: Let me get to some of the specifics on substance not process.

OBAMA: The only thing —

(CROSSTALK)

BAIER: (INAUDIBLE)

OBAMA: — the only thing I want to say, just to close up, is that when you talk about one-sixth of the economy, this is one-sixth of the economy that right now is a huge drag on the economy. Now, we can fix this in a way that is sensible, that is centrist. I have rejected a whole bunch of provisions that the left wanted that are — you know, they were very adamant about because I thought it would be too disruptive to the system. But what we can’t do is perpetuate a system in which millions of people day in and day out are having an enormously tough time and small businesses are sending me letters constantly saying that they are seeing their premiums increase 40, 50 percent.

BAIER: Mr. President, you said Monday that you praised the Congressional Budget Office numerous times. You also said this, this proposal makes Medicare stronger — and you just said it to me here —

OBAMA: Right.

BAIER: — it makes coverage better, it makes its finances more secure, and anyone who says otherwise is misinformed or is trying to misinform you.

OBAMA: Right.

BAIER: The CBO has said specifically that the $500 billion that you say that you’re going to save from Medicare is not being spent in Medicare. That this bill spends it elsewhere outside of Medicare. So you can’t have both.

OBAMA: Right.

BAIER: You either spend it on expenditures or you make Medicare more solvent. So which is it?

OBAMA: Here’s what it does. On the one hand what you’re doing is you’re eliminating insurance subsidies within Medicare that aren’t making anybody healthier but are fattening the profits of insurance companies. Everybody agrees that that is not a wise way to spend money. Now, most of those savings go right back into helping seniors, for example, closing the donut hole.

When the previous Congress passed the prescription drug bill, what they did was they left a situation which after seniors had spent a certain amount of money, suddenly they got no help and they were stuck with the bill. Now that’s a pretty expensive proposition fixing that. It wasn’t paid for at the time that that bill was passed. So that money goes back into Medicare, both to fix the donut hole, lower premiums.

All those things are important, but what’s also happening is each year we’re spending less on Medicare overall and as consequence, that lengthens the trust fund and it’s availability for seniors.

BAIER: Your chief actuary for Medicare said this, that cuts in Medicare: “cannot be simultaneously used to finance other federal outlays and extend the trust fund.” That’s your guy.

OBAMA: No — and what is absolutely true is that this will not solve our whole Medicare problem. We’re still going to have to fix Medicare over the long term.

BAIER: But it’s $38 trillion in the hole.

OBAMA: Absolutely, and that’s the reason that we’re going to have to — that’s the reason I put forward a fiscal commission based on Republicans and Democratic proposals, to make sure that we have a long-term fix for the system. The key is that this proposal doesn’t weaken Medicare, it makes it stronger for seniors currently who are receiving it. It doesn’t solve that big structural problem, Bret. Nobody’s claiming that this piece of legislation is going to solve every problem that’s been there for decades. What it does do is make sure that the trust fund is not going to be going bankrupt in seven years, according to their accounting rules —

BAIER: So you don’t buy —

OBAMA: — and in the meantime —

BAIER: — the CBO or the actuary that you can’t have it both ways?

OBAMA: No —

BAIER: That you can’t spend the money twice?

OBAMA: — no, what is absolutely true and what I do agree with is that you can’t say that you are saving on Medicare and then spend the money twice. What you can say is that we are going to take these savings, put them back to make sure that seniors are getting help on the prescription drug bill instead of that money going to, for example, insurance reform, and —

BAIER: And you call this deficit neutral, but you also set aside the doctor fix, more than $200 billion. People look at this and say, how can it be deficit neutral?

OBAMA: But the — as you well know, the doctors problem, as you mentioned, the “doctors fix,” is one that has been there four years now. That wasn’t of our making, and that has nothing to do with my health care bill. If I was not proposing a health care bill, right — let’s assume that I had never proposed health care.

BAIER: But you wanted to change Washington, Mr. President. And now you’re doing it the same way.

OBAMA: Bret, let me finish my — my answers here. Now, if suddenly, you’ve got, over the last decade, a problem that’s been built up. And the suggestion is somehow that, because that’s not fixed within this bill, that that’s a reason to vote against the bill, that doesn’t make any sense. That’s a problem that I inherited. That was a problem that should have been solved a long time ago. It’s a problem that needs to be solved, but it’s not created by my bill. And I don’t think you would dispute that.

BAIER: We’re getting the wrap-up sign here.

OBAMA: Yes.

BAIER: Can you be a transformative president if health care does not pass?

OBAMA: Well, I think that — look, I came in at a time when we probably had the toughest economic challenges since the Great Depression. A year later, we can say that, although we’re still a long way from where we need to be, that we have made the economy stronger. It’s now growing again. We have created a financial situation that is vastly better than it was before.

And so we’re now in a situation in which the economy is growing, moving. We’re reforming areas like education. We’re taking steps on energy. We’re doing a whole bunch of things out there that are going to create the foundation for long-term economic growth.

BAIER: So if it doesn’t pass, does that diminish your presence?

OBAMA: Well, if it doesn’t pass, I’m more concerned about what it does to families out there who right now are getting crushed by rising health care costs and small businesses who were having to make a decision, “Do I hire or do I fix health care?” That’s the reason I make these decisions.

BAIER: Mr. President, I’m getting wrapped up, and I don’t want to interrupt you, but to finish up, do you think this is going to pass?

OBAMA: I do. I’m confident it will pass. And the reason I’m confident that it’s going to pass is because it’s the right thing to do. Look, on a whole host of these measures, whether it’s health care, whether it was fixing the financial system, whether it’s making sure that we passed the Recovery Act, I knew these things might not be popular, but I was absolutely positive that they were the right thing to do and that, over time, we would be vindicated in having made those tough decisions.

I think health care is exactly the same thing. We — I’ve got a whole bunch of portraits of presidents around here, starting with Teddy Roosevelt, who tried to do this and didn’t get it done. The reason that it needs to be done is not its affect on the presidency. It has to do with how it’s going to affect ordinary people who right now are desperately in need of help.

BAIER: I apologize for interrupting you, sir. I tried to get the most for our buck here.

(CROSSTALK)

BAIER: Thank you very much for your time.

OBAMA: Thank you very much. I appreciate it. Thank you.

Content and Programming Copyright 2010 Fox News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2010 Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.

  • Cindy

    FOX ROCKS!!!!! Bret gave the best interview of a sitting Prez—ever!

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Oh damn! I wanted to watch!!!
    I hope it’s replayed all night. I can just imagine  that leprechaun Hannity giggling with glee. Happy St. Patrick’s Day!

  • Cindy

    Portia—according to schedule—Bret’s show is repeated at 3 a.m. central.

  • getfitnow

    I just saw a teaser clip from Shep’s show. Can’t wait to hear it!

    BO looks like he’s going a little heavy on the pancake makeup.

  • snosandy

    I’m guessing between Bill O’Reilly and Greta, most of it will be replayed on their shows.

  • Breeze

    A LITTLE BIT OF GOOD NEWS:

    http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/03/16/acorns-maryland-chapter-shuttered/

    Not only is ACORN gone from Ohio, it is now gone from Maryland….

    Thank you James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    pan stick…. yes he needs to switch to Mineral Make Up.
     
    Thought he was all ~~naturel~~ with MEchelle she’s slacking.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    What date did he set for it to be out there for us all to read his 2,700 pages? Or is that another fairytale?

  • Breeze

    HERE IS THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE FROM THE ‘BALTIMORE SUN’:

    MARCH 16, 2010

    A former leader of Maryland’s ACORN chapter said Monday the group will no longer operate in the state, doomed by an embarrassing national scandal six months ago from which the organization never recovered.

    Sonja Merchant-Jones, former co-chairwoman of the state chapter of ACORN and a board member since 1999, said there are no plans in Maryland to rebrand under a different name, a move undertaken Monday by several ACORN affiliates across the country.

    Maryland ACORN ceased operations late last year, Merchant-Jones said, and all the offices in the state have closed. The group has not held a board meeting in Maryland since November, she added.

    The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now came under scrutiny in September, when videos recorded in Baltimore showed workers counseling two conservative activists pretending to be a pimp and prostitute. Two staff members of the Baltimore office were fired because of the video, which was broadcast on major networks throughout the country and showed the employees giving tax-evading tips to the man and a scantily dressed female partner.

    The incident effectively shut down local and state offices, Merchant-Jones said, and the branches were forced to cease operations after dues-paying members fled.

    Congress reacted to the video by stripping ACORN’s federal funding. Last week a federal judge upheld a ruling that a law blacklisting ACORN and groups allied with it was unconstitutional, but observers doubt ACORN will recoup any money.

    With its federal dollars gone, ACORN’s national budget went from $24 million last year to $6 million this year.

    “The ACORN brand is probably ruined for life, and the only way they can operate is under a different name,” Merchant-Jones said.

    The Maryland chapter became active in 1999 amid a national push to expand. At its peak in 2006, the state chapter claimed about 6,000 members, with several thousand living in Baltimore. ACORN operated on an $850,000 budget and hosted a gala every year to raise money.

    Although the chapter was known for its outrageous antics – dumping a beat-up sofa on the steps of City Hall to highlight Baltimore’s trash problem in low-income neighborhoods, parading an employee around in a rat costume to showcase rodent infestation in the city – defenders say the group’s housing program has assisted hundreds of residents.

    ACORN, through the years, has also pressed city leaders on urban issues and given a loud voice to people who had never been involved in politics, advocates say.

    Last year, the group mobilized a public housing complex west of downtown where residents were threatened with eviction over enormous water bills.

    The residents’ bills were dropped after ACORN arranged meetings with city officials and the complex’s management company. ACORN also has rallied against foreclosures, blocking auctions on the courthouse steps and breaking into a padlocked home.

    ACORN was most known for its national voter registration drive, although critics have questioned the group’s techniques.

    Marvin “Doc” Cheatham, director of the Baltimore branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said ACORN’s departure would leave a void in the state’s advocacy for the poor, adding that its absence would be acutely felt as the state participates in data collection for the U.S. census.

    “They’ve done extremely well in reaching out to certain members of our community, the homeless, drug addicts … communities that are ignored,” said Cheatham, adding that he has worked with ACORN on voter registration efforts. “We were sad that they had the problems they had. The NAACP and other community groups are going to have to step up even more.”

    Sun reporters

    Nicole Fuller and
    Julie Bykowicz c

    ontributed to this article. <!– sphereit end –>
    Copyright © 2010, The Baltimore Sun
    <img src=”http://mv.trb.com/clear.gif?dname=www.baltimoresun.com&uri=/news/maryland/politics/bal-md.acorn16mar16,0,3718657.story&tag=/news/maryland/politics&citype=story&title=ACORN%27s%20Maryland%20chapter%20is%20shuttered&hkey=96c3179d30d998efc6fcb72ea52278e8″/>

  • getfitnow
  • Breeze

    CONTINUED:

    Merchant-Jones said the group was torn apart by infighting after the September incident. The nonprofit relied mostly on volunteers and low-paid employees to handle its in-office services, which included tax preparation and mortgage counseling. The Maryland headquarters on West 25th Street in lower Charles Village was where the secret recording was made.

    ACORN almost lost that property in 2006, when a group that bought liens on the building because of unpaid city property taxes and water bills sued for foreclosure. ACORN also lost a $7,000 court judgment to a landlord who rented space to the group in Hyattsville. Critics say these incidents were indicative of widespread disorganization.

    Some former employees agreed. Staffers have longed complained about the organization, saying ACORN fails to pay in a timely manner, if at all.

    Dave Schwartz, state director for the conservative group Americans for Prosperity, said he was “glad … the taxpayers will no longer be subsidizing the organization.”

    “When you run a fraudulent operation, eventually you make mistakes and you get sniffed out for it,” Schwartz said. “I think their mission is a worthy one. Obviously, we want to help the poor in any way we can. But their tactics and the use of taxpayer dollars, it’s not acceptable.”

    Sen. Nancy Jacobs, a Cecil and Harford County Republican and minority whip, said she was “surprised they’ve lasted this long.”

    “They have no credibility left. They can’t help but know that … ,” Jacobs said. “It’s an election year. No Democrat is going to want to go near them. They’re just bad news. They’ve been killed, politically.”

    The organization’s national Web site was disbanded by Monday morning. Several chapters in other states adopted new names, with some claiming no affiliation with ACORN; California ACORN, for example, is now Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, and New York ACORN has become New York Communities for Change.

    “I don’t believe the ACORN brand will ever be the same, nor should it be,” Merchant-Jones said. “If you’re in it to serve the need of working families and if you’re not going to do it right, you don’t need to do it at all.”

    Sun reporters

    Nicole Fuller and
    Julie Bykowicz

    contributed to this article.
    <!– sphereit end –>
    The Baltimore Sun
    <img src=”http://mv.trb.com/clear.gif?dname=www.baltimoresun.com&uri=/news/maryland/politics/bal-md.acorn16mar16,0,3718657.story&tag=/news/maryland/politics&citype=story&title=ACORN%27s%20Maryland%20chapter%20is%20shuttered&hkey=96c3179d30d998efc6fcb72ea52278e8″/>

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    PE, I think Bret is going to have it up at Fox, too. 

    It really was a good interview, despite Obama trying to make it seem like Bret was rude when Obama gave one of his non-answer answers, winding all around the hill and dale, aorund every bush possible, rather than just answer the damn question.

    Bret did an EXCELLENT job.  Obama showed how weak he really is.

    Hey, PE – in case you didn’t get it, I did respond to your comment. And thank you!!!

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    We had an article in our paper yesterday abt ACORN, but changing their name was abt all they were doing.  They were kepping ALL of their staffs, even the ones we saw on tape. 

    Wow – sounds like the same kind of “Change” Obama brought…

  • jbjd

    OMG, here’s a rush transcript.  Baier sounds incredibly knowledgeable; Obama sounds pre-programmed and out of sync.  About half-way down, he responds with “…the notion…”  I knew then, he was a goner.  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,589589,00.html

  • Texas Playwright

    It turns my stomach to hear ANYBODY referring to the lying, cheating, stealing squatter in OUR WH with a term used for AMERICAN leaders.  Congrats to the journalists, the few that we have, and anyone else who chooses to show deference to such an incompetent, mendacious puppet of the corparate/media fascists.

  • HARP

    On one hand Obama said it was his bill and later in the interview he goes on about how he dosen`t know whats in the bill. Later still, he opines about all the good stuff in it. I think Brett unglued him a little.

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    I just realized that this was a record for me – it is the longest I have ever been able to listen to Obama talk in ages (the longest was his speech to the Convention years ago).  Wow!  It isn’t going to start a trend, though – it was excruciating!  Just like listening to Bush was for me.  :)

  • Guest

    The man doesn’t know how to get his point across in a contested environment. Actually he’s making it contested. Bret is trying to be polite to a sitting President. The sitting President doesn’t know how to act like an executive and head of state.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    BAIER: OK, the Florida deal, in or out?
    OBAMA: The Florida deal —
    BAIER: Paying for Medicare Advantage, exempting 800,000 Floridians from —

    BAIER: Connecticut, Montana — there are a lot of deals in here, Mr. President, that people have issues about.

    BAIER: Mr. President, you couldn’t tell me what the special deals are that are in or not today.
    OBAMA: I just told you what was in and what was not in.
    BAIER: Is Connecticut in?
    OBAMA: Connecticut — what are you specifically referring to?

    Draw your own conclusions!

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    While  I applaud Bret for this line of questioning…. Its just to bad he did not have the balls to disaobey his bosses and take on George Bush in the same manner…. But then Fox News is all republican all the time…..

    Gosh Larry you have forgotten the game and how its played at fox? Or did you forget Danny Pearl? Yes I blame John Moody and Fox News for his death….

  • Juliezzz

    I can NOT listen to him ugh!!!  How many sentences can you bare to listen to obama?

    1….2….3…..click  3!

  • WhatNow

    I think Bret did an outstanding job!?!  Just received this bit of information- the house is suspending it’s rules till Mar 21st. I think the little picky details that Bret was asking Obama about like “deemes” are being put into place:
    H. Res.__ – Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules 
    Wednesday, March 17, 2010 
    H. Res.__ – Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules 
    Managers: McGovern / Foxx 
    RULE THAT ALLOWS FOR SUSPENSION AUTHORITY ON ANY MEASURE THROUGH THE CALENDAR DAY OF MARCH 21, 2010 ! ;

    Motion Offered By
    Summary of Motion
    Vote Tally
    McGovern

     To report the rule that allows for suspension authority on any measure through the calendar day of March 21, 2010.
    Agreed to by
    voice vote*

    *Absent: Cardoza 
    For further information, please visit
    HTTP://RULES-REPUBLICANS.HOUSE.GOV

  • ~~JustMe~~

    George Bush????  what the hell you going on about. Get with the program sparrow.

  • Larry Johnson

    You horses ass.  You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.  I was in contact with Danny one day before he went missing.  You are ignorant of the matter.

  • samb

    Obama was on the defensive the entire time. Fox News has been criticized by the White House as not being “real news”, not true today. Good Job Baier.

  • carol haka

    Don’t you mean “Brent”?

    Sounded to me like that is what he was calling him.

    BO – The “squiggle” mobster in charge!

    >:o

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    While  I applaud Bret for this line of questioning. Its just to bad he did not have the balls to disaobey his bosses and take on George Bush in the same manner. He would have more creditability. But then Fox News is all republican all the time….. Bret while one of the better reporters at Fox knows who butters his bread and I don’t ever remember him being critical of the Bush Administration in the way he just showed for Obama. 

    So Bret got emails from the choir? Really? Let’s see I understand that there was r a time where as Pentagon Reporter Bret was wired to the Fox Control Room and actually asked questions to Rummy and Meyers that came from one of the retired Generals who was talking into Bret’s ear piece?
     
    Gosh Larry you have forgotten the game and how its played at Fox? Or because Bret here hammer Obama? Where was Bret with Val Plame? Where was Bret with Scooter? Hell where was Bret with the WMD’s and Iraq? Bret knew better?  Did you forget how dangerous a game Fox’s plays for ratings? Danny Pearl come to mind? John Moody should have gone to jail for that one…..

  • carol haka

    It was the same talking point answers as ever.

    =-O

  • Armymom

    Knew it wouldn’t be long before the same old shit would be expoused. Bush, blah blah, blah blah.

    Get a friggin life. Bush isn’t in office. Obummer is. And he was the one being interviewed. Funny you seem to forget that Obama waged a war against Fox, but now that he is plummeting in his approval ratings, he’s playing a game to reach independents. But I guess you’re okay with that game.

  • Tricia

    Good for Bret–at lats, someone with cajones.

  • sowsear

    Idaho first to sign measure authorizing AG to sue if Health Insurance is mandatory:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100317/ap_on_go_co/us_health_overhaul_states

  • IndieDogg

    For the self-named pirate….

    The Obama interview was about Health Care, Obama, and his inconsistent statements on the legislative process with respect to ObamaCare.  The interview was not about Bret Baier.  If you’d like to substute “Questioner” for Baier’s name, I would not object.  The interview was terrific, regardless of who was asking the questions (and yes, people might be excedingly happy to have seen it if only because it’s like a drop of water in a news media desert — can’t really blame them).

    Your dislike for previous interviews and/or actions of the person asking the questions in this interview is irrelevant and immaterial.  If your complaint is that Baier wasn’t part of the marching media horde that trampled Bush like Main Street on St. Paddy’s Day, that would seem another topic for another time.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    ArmyMom you are clueless better get to the Jim Jones Church you belong to the cool-aid is waiting!  You just are not getting it !

  • sowsear

    I didn’t watch, beyond my pay scale. From the transcript:

    Bret sure did know what he was talking about. He had every point/counterpoint on the tip of his tongue. Obama was flustered.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Plus sparrow you delete your posts after insulting Larry then chirp further down. I sincerely hope Larry fries your ip address.

  • Armymom

    Wow, what are you 4 or 5 years old?  I have grandchildren that are more literate than you

  • AnnieCarmel

    Huh?  Wrong thread, Larry?

  • Armymom

    The self named pirate is irrelevant and immaterial. :-D

  • AnnieCarmel

    Obama continues with his Shell Game…now you see it, now you don’t.

  • Mandelay

    “Finally, a journalist with some balls who can ask tough questions.”

    You said it all, Larry!  It’s almost shocking to see that after a year in office, The One cannot handle a reporter … a reporter from that wicked Fox News Network.  Obama was way over his head, despite Juan Williams saying that Obama was on a higher level. (That was a hoot.  That, and Krauthammer saying he was going to the dinner as a waiter.)  Obama stumbled, bumbled, tried his best to hoodwink and bamboozle, but the thrill is gone, gone, gone!

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Please go tell it to your momma. This is about creditability as a journo. I don’t blame Bret for going after Obama. That’s fine with me all’s fair in love and war. As far as his questions? I have to wonder who wrote them for him? But it pissing me off that he as a journo would not do the same with the Bush Administartion and its faults.

    So stop blowing smoke and using healthcare as an excuse. Sons and Daughters of this Country died because of a war of choice and a lie to war with a Country we had boxed in that was no immediate threat to us. 

    Where was the hero Fox Reporter then?  I can tell you where he was. Being told in the morning daily bureau meeting to shut his mouth and defend the Bush decision! I suppose to beat the others as anchor to Special Report he sold his soul to Roger Ailes.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    ArmyMom… if that is really true and you have a son or daughter in the Army. For their sake….GROW UP!

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Indiedogg..

    Please go tell it to your momma. This is about creditability as a journo. I don’t blame Bret for going after Obama. That’s fine with me, all’s fair in love and war.

    As far as his questions? I have to wonder who wrote them for him? But it’s pissing me off that he as a journo would not do the same with the Bush Administartion and its faults.  Nor the Republicans and their errors.
     
    So stop blowing smoke and using healthcare as an excuse or saying the subject is for another time. Sons and Daughters of this Country died because of a war of choice and a lie to war with a Country we had boxed in that was no immediate threat to us. That is more important than even healthcare. 
     
    Where was the hero Fox Reporter then?  I can tell you where he was. Being told in the morning daily bureau meeting to shut his mouth and defend the Bush decision! I suppose to beat the others as anchor to Special Report he sold his soul to Roger Ailes.

    Get a life and a clue!
    EditModerate

  • carol haka

    Really?  When are you morons going to get the point that everything isn’t about Bush?

    >:o

  • Armymom

    Can’t answer questions from above post so have to deflect your immaturity onto someone else and you tell me to grow up? Then you post juvenile pictures and you tell me to grow up?  I suggest you take the bong out of your mouth, the patch off your pirate eye and go look in the mirror.

  • John johnwsmart.com

    This issue is simple for me. Obama demanded an up or down vote. Now he’s making room for deem and pass. If he was any more full of shit he’d explode. 
    http://www.johnwsmart.com/2010/03/up-or-down-versus-deem-and-pass.html

    As for the gripe about how Bush was handled by Fox…whatever…these sad little excuses make me ill. The point that everyone must throw back in the excuse makers faces is simple: Obama was supposed to be better. Obama was supposed to change the tone. Obama was the great redeemer. The comparison with bush is silly. Any number of women and men would have done a better job than Bush. So what? Compare Obama 2010 to Obama 2008. That’s what counts. 

  • Armymom

    How dare you use the sons and daughters of this country as your piss poor excuse to flog this reporter because you don’t like him questioning your messiah. This POS commander took more time to fill out his NCAA brackets and explain his methods than he did to discuss what is in the healthcare package and you’re pissed because a reporter FINALLY asked him some hard questions. Go play outside, preferably on a busy highway. My son is fighting for more journalist to ask their CIC some important questions. If it starts now, it fucking starts now. If not now, when?

  • sowsear

    The dirty, rotten cowards.

  • sowsear

    What a Honey Bucket!

  • sowsear

    Bet FOX won’t get another interview anytime soon…in the Blue Room.

  • sowsear

    This POS commander took more time to fill out his NCAA brackets and explain his methods than he did to discuss what is in the healthcare

    Isn’t that a disgrace?

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    No Armymom…Obama is not my messiah. So stop blowing smoke. I did not vote for this guy. But he is the President. And if George Bush can send men and women to war, something he would not do himself and lie to the American Public about the reasons to go to war, while allowing the outing of a NOC for political gain to go unchecked. The Health care debate while important is no where near the magnitude of horrors that needed to be hammered by Fox News. But instead they ran interference.

    For a mother with a child in the military that should be very unsettling. But I guess you could careless because your political views are as onesided as your thought process is.

    Dumbing of America!

  • Armymom

    It is isn’t it. My hubby and I were watching him and my husband remarked, wow, he’s got more details for the NCAA tournament than he does for healthcare, that should tell people something”.

  • Puma.for.Life

    same here; longest I have ever listened to him and he was horrible.  His game plan is to talk nonstop a bunch of gibberish; I’m glad Baier kept interrupting him otherwise it would have  been a filibuster.  He said absolutely nothing….

  • Armymom

    My son ENLISTED on his own free will, after college, knowing what he could possibly get involved in. He did it for love of country, not for a political agenda. He was well over 21, informed, educated and very patriotic. He endured 4 years of liberal mantra from a very liberal college and yet, he still enlisted.

    In case you don’t know this, Bush is out of office, Obama is in. We are talking about Obama. We already know what went right and what went wrong with Bush. There is no need to rehash, regurgitate those talking points. With 2 years of softball questions regarding Obama, I for one am glad that one has FINALLY asked some tough questions. All we hear anymore is it isn’t “Obama’s fault” it is the previous administration’s fault. And now you want to regurgitate “Bush’s” fault again with your talking points. Get over yourself and get over Bush.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    No ~Just me! ….I just correct my typoes….. My post is there and I believe LJ understands my point of view. I pull no punches and while I have a high regard for LJ he sometimes let’s his emotions get away from him. Now I agree that Baier did a fine job. But its too bad that LJ did not hammer him for not doing the same with the others. I will remind LJ that it was Moody, Hume and Alies who blackballed him from Fox for speaking the truth. The same as Hume did to Scott Ritter.  By the way, where was the Great Bret Baier with that black balling? Let me tell you… holding is porridge bowl at Hume’s desk asking for more….

    Been there, seen that, don’t forget and never will… When you sell your soul to the devil its hard to ask for a refund.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Carol

    Get this through your thick skull! Its about fairness and equality!. Fox News and Bret Bairer are no better than the idiots at MSNBC and the lost ones at CNN! To bad Baier is as selective with his tough questions as Chris Matthews is …

  • AC

    Captain Jack Sparrow,
    freedom of speech and I agree but what’s with invoking peoples mothers.  It seems to run as a theme.  You admonish others to grow up but–what’s up with that?  In my neighborhood while growing up bringing up a person’s mother was a fighting offense.  Is that what you’re looking for?
    Say what you like but let’s keep parents out of it!

  • Jillie

    yes, juan williams was hilarious…”bo can’t be bothered with ‘minutia,”..like the small details of what is actually in the bill and oh yes, those pesky constitutional ‘procedures’ about congress actually voting on bills, not deeming them into reality.

    and, speaking of minutia, i was just wondering whether the appellation ‘sparrow’ was intended to imply the size of the brain or the genitalia.

  • AC

    Captain Jack Sparrow, you wrote:

    “Indiedogg..  

    Please go tell it to your momma.”

    Freedom of speech and I agree but what’s with invoking peoples mothers. It seems to run as a theme. You admonish others to grow up but–what’s up with that? In my neighborhood while growing up bringing up a person’s mother was a fighting offense. Is that what you’re looking for? 
    Say what you like but let’s keep parents out of it!

  • Breeze

    Bret Baier   

    [Seth Leibsohn]
    National Review OnLine
    March 17, 2010

    Bret Baier just concluded the single best interview of President Obama<img style=”position: relative; margin: 0px; width: 10px; display: inline !important; float: none; height: 10px; top: 1px; left: 1px; border: 0px; padding: 0px;” src=”http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif”/> in a year, by any reporter.  He was resilient in the face of the president’s obvious attempts to run down the clock by stonewalling; Bret continually hammered a series of questions the president did not want, and yet he was polite in explaining to the president the meaning of the questions just in case they were not what the president was familiar with (see the question about Connecticut for example).  

    It was a model of how not to be cowed by a strong and charismatic leader and a model of a truly independent anchor/reporter.  

    President Obama<img style=”position: relative; margin: 0px; width: 10px; display: inline !important; float: none; height: 10px; top: 1px; left: 1px; border: 0px; padding: 0px;” src=”http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif”/> knew he didn’t have Bret at the very end when his last effort at victimhood was to sarcastically hang his head to the side in response to Bret’s saying he didn’t mean to interrupt, as if Bret were being insincere—which he wasn’t.

    Anyone who watches the interview can see who was stalling, who was running the clock, who was refusing to answer the questions, and why polite interruption was exactly what was needed.  

    It was a model.  

    If any of the MSM can watch it and conclude anything it is that FNC deserves
    a) its ratings and b) kudos for being truly independent from the herd of faux independent minds, the likes of which Howell Raines seems to esteem.

    Bret showed the rest of the press how to do it from now on.

    03/17 07:36 PM

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Your post is completely different than the original one you quickly took off. The thing is you insult & offend not only posters but their family without regard. You’re no sparrow you’re a mouse!  

  • Hokma

     ”Fox News is all republican all the time”

    Actually Shep Smith is a bleeding heart Democrat as is Juan Williams and Alan Colmes.

    In fact, and I could be wrong, I believe they once referred to Bret Baier as a registered Democrat.

    Baier was just doing his job as a journalist which is a lost artform now.

  • Clara

    I only listen long enough to reach a volume or mute button.  I would like to hear the smack down by Bret so may have to suffer through “the voice”. 

  • Clara

    Can you explain what this means?

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Ok ArmyMom? Ok Bret Baier and I know you drop in on NO from time to time. This is what I want you to do. Turn around and now ask John Boehner and Mitch McConnell the tough questions? 

    Let me write one for you Bret… Congressman /Senator, how much money have you take from the health insurance lobby between 2006 to 2010?

    Try this one? Congressman Boehner, did you or the Freedom Project ever hire anyone from the health insurance lobby?

    Point is ask the tough questions of BOTH SIDES! This is another war of choice, Fox News style.

  • AC

    It’s a pity that Bret asked about Tiger Woods at the end–who gives a shit, maybe at that stage he was just trying to be personable.  What’s more irritating is that the Washington Post had a Tiger story just below the mast. Pitiful for the premier newspaper of the nations capitol.

  • Yttik

    Well, I vote we throw the fool off the island. I don’t take kindly to people who verbally attack mothers.

  • Armymom

    I’d say more like a chicken shit, not a mouse, you can train mice. :)

  • getfitnow

    o/t, but I thought you’ed want to know that the wife (Monica) of the Honorable Rep and Chairman of the Judiciary committee, John Conyers has been declared indigent by the court.

  • Armymom

    Are you kidding me? MSNBC has a direct line to the White House on what to say and not say!! The All Barack Channel gets their talking points as well and you’re concerned with Fox actually asking hard questions of Obama today? No, you worried about what happened years ago. We found out the past few years that journalism died, it awakened today on one channel and you’re upset? Hell I’m doing cartwheels that there was one reporter who didn’t ask him about the tournaments, or about his stupid dog.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    He falls in this category! Please refrain from training ;)

    Mice can at times be harmful rodents, damaging and eating crops[1], causing structural damages and spreading diseases through their parasites and feces[2]. In North America, breathing dust that has come in contact with mouse excrements has been linked to hantavirus, which may lead to Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS).

  • AC

    Does she need money in jail?

  • NoBama

    You sure know how to give people a headache.

    Quit with the talking points already.  We haven’t forgotten how much money BO raised in small donations from Mickey Mouse and Elvis. 

    For the record, tell your boss we’re tired of him calling  the American people “special interests”. 

    Nothing left for you to see here, move along.

  • Armymom

    ;)

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    Ordinarily, that’s how I am too, Clara.  But this time, since there was a real journalist interviewing him, I thought I should see if he would actually say anything.  The answer was no!

  • Hank

    Yeah I caught that too…

  • Rabble Rouser Rev. Amy

    I’m guessing one of the Obots did a drive by – put in something obnoxious, then when Larry responded, deleted their comment.  That is their new favorite thing to do.  Nice, huh?

  • Armymom
  • Breeze

    Obama Goes Upside Down in Gallup Tracking

    Tom Bevan
    RealClearPolitics.com
    March 17, 2009

    A rather dramatic swing in the Gallup Daily Tracking poll has put President Obama’s job rating upside down for the first time, with more Americans now disapproving of job he’s doing than approving.  According to today’s numbers, which represent a rolling average of surveys taken over the past three days, 47%  say they disapprove of Obama while 46% approve. That’s a net five-point change from yesterday’s reading of 48% approve and 44% disapprove, which is a pretty substantial move for a tracking poll. It means the President probably suffered a combination of a good day of polling dropping off the back end of the rolling average while adding a bad day of polling to the front end.

    Of course, the President’s numbers could easily snap right back, and in general it’s best to take a long view of tracking polls rather than react to day-to-day fluctuations. Nevertheless, just as when Obama first dropped below 50 percent in the Gallup, it’s a rather inauspicious milestone for any President to reach, and perhaps especially so for the current one given the heights at which he started just fifteen months ago.

  • Docelder

    Yep, take all the red t-shirts out and get purple ones with some new name on them. What does it cost to start a new entity on paper? Not much I would guess.

  • sowsear

    Why some cannot see the downside of Obamacare:
    …..
    So, the deal is, in Psychology, people are able to throw out evidence. They will convince themselves that up is down and right is wrong to maintain a sense of equilibrium even when evidence suggests equilibrium cannot be achieved under this conflicting evidence or under these perverse incentives. That, for all the good that it does, explains why some folks can believe that this mess of a health policy will solve ills and achieve goals when it is likely to create a massive wealth transfer and a huge deadweight loss to society. It makes them feel better to believe that this is a circumstance where the lightbringer will deliver their pony. It justifies their decision to support him at all costs…..

    http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/perverse-incentives/

  • sowsear

    She probably needs lawyer appointed by the court.

  • Pingback: Robert Bryant's page » Blog Archive » Vitamins for the pituitary gland | Vitamin Makers Blog

  • Ferd Berfle

    That One says, “exact same”. In response I say, “prevaricator liar”. I mean really. Anyone out there for little small or ignorant obot? Redundancy is the order of the day. Change the words thinking you’re *really* smart and end up with a tautology in lieu of sound discourse.

    That One is not only NOT a great orator but is indeed a man who has lots of lines, irrespective of source, but no real way to put them together because he only reads the garbage that is fed him. He’s a word disposal unit.

    The next person who says That One can actually speak the Queen’s English is a pin-headed microcephalus. Just speaking saying.

  • sowsear

    She probably needs a lawyer appointed by the court.

  • sowsear

    Apparently she and John don’t share..

  • Yttik

    ROFL! What’s really funny is that story actually makes more sense then any other I’ve heard.

  • SoCalDem

    How is that possible, she had a good job for the government and her husband is a congresscritter. She can’t be broke and shouldn’t qualify for a public defender. Sounds very shady to me.

  • Cindy

    I didn’t watch, beyond my pay scale

    LOL Sows!

  • snosandy

    He was trying to hoodwink and bamboozle us, doing the old okey doke.

  • Required Reading

    Jillie – I wouldn’t make any assumptions about the existence of a brain.

  • Cindy

    Rev Amy–me too. First time I’ve ever listened to an O interview from beginning to end. But Brett was such a compelling interviewer! I was mesmerized by his (Brett’s)  tenacity and brilliance!

  • Required Reading

    Oh no; Obama’s not the great REdeemer.  Now he’s just the Great Deemer.

  • Ferd Berfle

    My leg is getting mighty wet which coincidentlly corresponds to the timing of the lies coming out of DC but it ain’t raining now.

  • Hank

    Hey Tweetie bird STFU, so your saying that the interviews that the MSM did with Palin and McCain were fair.  Like The View having Obama on the show and Baaba telling him how good looking he was is good journalism. 

  • snosandy

    Larry must’ve been meaning to reply to Cap’n Jack down thread.

  • Armymom

    Scary isn’t it. I mean, that it makes more sense than the others. Especially after Massa and the showers with Rahm. :-D

  • Hank

    That was my favorite part when BO hanged his head to the side.  “Finally”

  • snosandy

    Uhmm, Cap’n Jack, did you see Larry’s reply to you above?

  • AC

    I need to look into this further.  It’s my understanding that she plead guilty (as per a deal they worked out) to received reduced or no more than a certain sentence.
    This is curious that now she’s appealing.  Usually appeals are taken as a result of a trial.  This is the first I’m familiar with that a person who cooped a plea now wants to appeal.
    How many bites of the apple do connected persons get in Detroit?

  • Ferd Berfle

    Mr. President:

    Can you shut up for more than a few microseconds? There are 300,000,000 who also want to make a f-ing statement that doesn’t include the phrase “the notion”.

    Kindly shut up.

  • Required Reading

    Be generous, Ferd: those mistaking Obama for a dirigible-headed macrocephalus are just the poor saps drinking the koolaid. Obama himself is the pin-headed microcephalus. Whoops – there’s another tautology in lieu of sound discourse — must be something in the water…..

  • ~~JustMe~~

    No he replied in the correct spot, the mouse (sparrow) deleted his post. It was truly, offensive but mouse scurried off and hid behind a different post! Just like he scurries around daily leaving droppings all over!

    Beware mouse on the loose!

  • Ferd Berfle

    LMAO, RR. Yep, the followers of the One/Singularity are bozos/clowns and sheep/goats and…

    But I’m laughing/crying–and that is where it falls apart. of course, since bots don’t understand juxtaposition.

  • TeakWoodKite

    … “And if people vote yes, whatever form that takes,…”

    Mental note: Ask BO if it is an unconstitutional “form”, would that be an acceptable?

    Also, remember to ask ”The One” if this is a trick zen question? I mean how many forms of “yes” are there?   oooommmm.  

  • sowsear

    If he can’t stay on the up side with Gallup, he is lost/

  • Docelder

    Like a kids toy… the See-N-Say. He only says the same few things over and over no matter how many times you pull his string. Even those few words aren’t his own.

  • sowsear

    She probably applied to ACORN for help. I’m sure they have a program just right for her circumstances.

  • Required Reading

    Well, Ferd – I cry when I have to listen to Obama and then I laugh when I come on here because of you good people who have no trouble juxtaposing the inanities of the Bush years and the insanities of Obama Year One — and that’s the only thing that keeps me from falling apart. I can’t wait till we’re all delivered from the inanity insanity.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Last I checked, someone who repeated things over and over, in spite of evidence to the contrary, was a tidal bore or an invincibly ignorant ideologue.

    Gee, obamabots and Obama are nearly identical to bushbots and Bush.

    Go figure.

  • Ferd Berfle

    “Also, remember to ask ”The One” if this is a trick zen question? I mean how many forms of “yes” are there?”

    Hell, I’d just like to ask him what canned clapping sounds like on stage.

    And also, if That One was speaking and no one was around to hear his hogwash, would clapping be heard? Would swine care?

  • Required Reading

    Well, he is always patting himself on the back.  Could that be a variation on clapping with one hand?

  • sowsear

    …”bo can’t be bothered with ‘minutia,”..like the small details of what is actually in the

    Juan Williams always shills for BO. He thinks that the President who is being interviewed about ”his” Healthcare bill wouldn’t have any of the facts so he could speak intelligently about it…Huh? Why would he be there, otherwise?

  • sowsear

    Oh, the dirigible head is Boxer…what a riot.

  • HARP

    Obama took 18.6 million from these groups but thanks for playing.

  • Armymom

    OMG, I had forgotten about those toys. You’re right, he does sound like a see & say. Perhaps the Barnyard one with the animal sounds.

  • sowsear

    BO doesn’t want the details, just report back to me when it’s done.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Well, Ferd – I cry when I have to listen to Obama and then I laugh when I come on here because of you good people who have no trouble juxtaposing the inanities of the Bush years and the insanities of Obama Year One — and that’s the only thing that keeps me from falling apart. I can’t wait till we’re all delivered from the inanity insanity.
    ===============================
    Amen. I, too, come because of the good people here like you who are called every name in the book by the those who have no ear to the rail as it were but insist that no train is barreling down the tracks and that, further, there is no need to worry because they’re “on it”.

    After 26 years of dealing with bureaucrats and polliticians, I call bullshit.

  • Ferd Berfle

    “Could that be a variation on clapping with one hand?”

    Well I’m of the opinion that it’s cooties from Me-chelle.

  • sowsear

    And he couldn’t even prepare for that. Seems he doesn’t know how to spell Syracuse.

  • buzzlatte

    blah, blah, blah, 

  • Ferd Berfle

    Obama will next be on the religious trail. his new motto will be, “Can I get a witless?”

  • TeakWoodKite

    then somebody who votes for this bill, they’re going to be judged at the polls. And the same is going to be true if they vote against it.

    Judgement Day?

  • candy

    I’m just thinking that if Sarah Palin had given these same answers as Obama did, the Obots would have a field day. But of course, it’s ok for the Holy One to say things like “Connecticut — what are you specifically referring to?”
     

  • TeakWoodKite

     the fix that only fixed Nebraska, and didn’t fix the rest of the states.

    I thought in BO’s book, he said, “Never smack.” [sic]

  • Ferd Berfle

    Does he even comprehend the words he’s reciting?

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Obama was Obama!

  • sowsear

    This is how Yahoo slants for BO:
    - President Barack Obama on Wednesday took to the Fox News Channel, derided by his White House as a wing of the Republican Party, to sell his embattled health care overhaul in an interview punctuated with interruptions from the host and chiding from the guest.

  • Ferd Berfle

    “We know that this is going to reduce the deficit by over a trillion dollars. So you’ve got a good package, in terms of substance. I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or the Senate.”
    ==============
    Oh, so you, Mr. Oblahblah, spent time in the Senate but don’t care for procedural rules. I would surmise rules aren’t for YOU. And, by the way, how can you claim such savings as you bloviate about when the bill is not only not passed but not available for public review? Further, what substance is there to a chimera that has been seen by no one, read by no one, and is the subject of lots of guessing? Oh, you’re just talking through your other blow-hole. Mea culpa.

  • Ferd Berfle

    Yahoo is more like Uh, Duh.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Couldn’t agree more RR !!! Stops me feeling like I am on that train Ferd!

  • No Longer Banned in Beantown

    I also did not watch and read the transcript. I can’t stomach O’bos voice.

    “The Notion”
    and
    “Look”

    Classic Obama tells to let you know to cover up ’cause the bullshit is a commin.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    I am sure they just spend spend spend SoCalDem. They don’t have to save for a rainy day or healthcare money simply appears!

  • sowsear

    Supposedly Kucinich did get his price:
    understand that they promised Kucinich an ERISA waiver, which will allow for single-payer solutions to be created in the states. Kucinich has been pursuing the state single-payer solution for quite some time, so if he indeed does get the ERISA waiver, it’s a big victory for him and single-payer activists.
    (I saw this at Widdershins with no link, needs verifying, of course)

  • CD

    This endless HC debate is making my head spin.

    In no uncertain terms I’m gonna go make myself some popcorn. :-P

  • Onofre’s arm

    Well ~JustMe~, what I conclude is what I’ve known all along, Obama is a lying sack of shit. 

    He practically just admitted to Bret that special considerations (bribes) that he used to get several fence sitting Dem Senators to vote “yes” on the Senate bill, are being either withdrawn or modified. And he lamely excuses the ones that he’s not withdrawing: Earthquake in Hawaii? 

    If they manage to illegally ram this bill through, we’ll all end up feeling as sore as the betrayed Dem Senators who’ve felt the painful affects of one of Obama’s signature rearward assaults. 

  • lorac

    Oooooooo – did you just say “fairy tale”?  You racist!

  • Onofre’s arm

    Candy, we would never hear the end of it had this been Palin.

  • TiredOfSufferingFoolsGladly

    ‘Dumbing of America!’

    Again, what a riot, coming from you, Captain Jackass!

  • lorac

    I think Brett unglued him a little.

    Well, he kept pressing him for details.  Obama kept trying to obfuscate, rambling in very general terms, and Brett would keep pushing for the direct answer to the question he had asked.  To Obama, that was “interrupting’.  I think Brett’s statement that he knows Obama “doesn’t like to fillibuster” was polite sarcasm, implying “hey, dude, shut up and just answer the question, you’re fillibustering so I can’t get my job done!”

  • TeakWoodKite

    That wasn’t of our making, and that has nothing to do with my health care bill.

    The “doctor fix” has nothing to do with …Huh?

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Hey Onofre’s arm,

    Earthquake in Hawaii?  
    Yes I heard that but was unsure and never did check it out….

    So at a guess he is sending money to Hawaii? Sure we all know what that payment is for.

    Guess his BC will be gold plated now :)

  • TeakWoodKite

    “I’ve got a whole bunch of portraits of presidents around here…”

    NO, you do not. Those are the property of the citizens of this country. Are you one?

  • sowsear

    I was just remembering when Bush was outfitted with some kind of a receiver on his back—he couldn’t rremember what he had to say either.

  • sowsear

    Or another shakedown maybe. Is that what she was accused of?

  • ~~JustMe~~

     What’s that saying you scratch my back and I will scratch yours!

  • lorac

    ….so the tactic of distraction for today is “shoot the messenger”?

    Obama may not be transparent, but his minions sure are.

    Start a new thread arguing about how journalists should be impartial.  Many people will agree.

    This thread is about how, after two long years without, we get to finally see a non-puff interview of the Selected One.

    Try to keep up.  :)

  • ~~JustMe~~

    What’s that saying you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours!

  • sowsear

    Not written yet…

  • sowsear

    They’ll probably be writing it for a long time…as they go and to fit the circumstances they want. Who will be able to challenge the law or it’s parts?

  • lorac

    For heaven’s sake.  Of course Fox is slanted right.  Every other station is slanted left!  But you’re all upset about FOX?  I thought you were all about equality and justice.  Then start a thread talking about ALL of the stations, and leave the ideology out of your analysis. 

    Maybe you could get started on that now, writing that different thread, and stop trying to DISTRACT on THIS one.

  • buzzlatte

    Sigh…Obama’s an idiot.  Different day, same idiot.

    Baer took Obama to the woodshed.  Did Obama learn?  Don’t bet on it.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    =-O

  • Steel Magnolia

    Don’t you get it?  Juan MUST shill for Obama – otherwise, he’s called an Uncle Tom and worse equally vile names for AAs that don’t cover for him.

  • sowsear

    Pity the blind who cannot see.

  • sowsear

    Wait until you hear the WH spinorama.

  • lorac

    Hey, you guys – no fair for us science-deficient people!

  • lorac

    Teak, I caught that, too…..  how many “forms” of voting “yes” can there be?  Unless he was referring to the deeming, which would be a “form” of voting which precludes voting!

    I liked the interview.  But I do wish he would have been REALLY bold and asked BO if he has read the bill lol  That squirm would have been fun to watch!

  • lorac

    Ferd, I think the answer to your question takes the “form” of the word “no”.

  • Cindy

    (Onofre) …….painful affects of one of Obama’s signature rearward assaults. 

    But with Holder’s legal finesse, he could get a sodomy charge knocked down to “Following too closely” ;)

  • Onofre’s arm

    Oh My Cindy, is that how you read my post? I’m shocked! I would never ever ever imply that Obama is capable of such unseemly behavior.

    Actually, knowing Obama’s arrogance, he would probably counter sue with the claim that the Senators were at fault for illegally squatting on his plot. 

  • Cindy

    Onofre—Laughing Out Loud!!

  • lorac

    I agree, except that his deficit is directly related to his lack of knowledge of the details.  A “work horse” wouldn’t have had to meander and then try to pass off the assertion “I already answered that”.  A “work horse” would have answered each direct question directly, succinctly, and intelligently.

    Bush put a horse judge in charge of FEMA, and now we have a president who is a “show horse”.  It just keeps getting worse!

  • tango

    “I’ve got a whole bunch of portraits of presidents around here…” 

    He forgot to mention that 99% of them are of himself if what Ed Schultz says is true.

    I thought Obama managed to say very little of substance in such a long interview.

    Also, someone pointed out Tonight on Greta’s show (I think) that there won’t be any more Cornhusker type kickbacks in the bill but what the Democrats will do to get those swing votes, is promise future goodies.  Tell that on the fence Congressman that if he votes yes, he’ll get the funding for his pet project, etc.   Or maybe something like positions in the WH (if someones looking to leave the Congress), or cushy jobs with supporters or even plumb Congressional Committee assignments.  The way I see it, the Congress & WH will renig on the deal &/or promise whatever so far in the future that it will never have to come to pass due to the continuing weakness in the economy or the state of government.  I expect Obama will throw those people under the bus too.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Would he be bragging or complaining ? ;)

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Cap’n — I’m taking a wild guess that it’s spring break at your school and all the frat bros are bored because they couldnt make it down to Padre Island. There are definitely more than one of “you” if not corporeally, then you have multiple personality disorder. But there is help for your problem. Go to Health Services as soon a classes start up again and ask to see someone. Really.

    That’s why the sparrow is a lark.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Brava, Armymom! Brava!!

  • jbjd

    Brit Hume said, while Obama refused to answer Bret Baier’s questions about the health insurance bill – he cited the non-answer to the Medicare double-counting question as highlighting that problem many others have with the bill – the mere fact that he did the interview shows, at this point, he doesn’t have the votes for passage.  http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/special-report/index.html#/v/4113320/brit-hume-on-obama-health-care/?playlist_id=87546

  • whoframedrudy

    Now that’s what we have a First Amendment for.

    When somebody says “it’s my understanding …”, that means they either don’t know or they are bullshitting.

    I’m surprised Obama didn’t go to his ‘But there’s a bigger picture here…” dodge when he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.  But he says “the core issue …” which is another way to keep the discussion on the vague, general level.  Does he not get it?  We think his bill is defective.  We don’t believe it’s going to work.  When there’s a funny burning smell coming out of my microwave, I throw it out.  And I don’t replace it with another defective one.  That doesn’t mean I’m opposed to microwaves.  There’s a funny smell coming out of Congress.

  • arabella trefoil

    How droll. This sentence expresses exactly how I feel about Yahoo, whenever I make the mistake of using its services:

    “with interruptions from the host and chiding from the guest.”

    Arabella used Yahoo’s instant messaging with pop-up interruptions from the host (Yahoo) and chiding from the guest/user (Friggin’ Yahoo!)

  • arabella trefoil

    He looks terrible. Is is sick? Is he tired? Or does he need a new make-up artist? Why does he looks like he’s covered with Silly Putty?

    Plus that strange bald spot he has on the side of his head is getting bigger.

    Michelle has her own make-up artist and she always looks good. Why can’t the president get some decent people to make him look better on camera?

    (I watch him with the sound turned off, so I can only comment on his body language. His body language tells me he is one pissed off dude.)

    Oh, and speaking of Michelle, she’s been pretty quiet lately.

  • getfitnow

    Anything? ;)

  • getfitnow

    Why anybody, at this juncture, would believe anythin these lying thugs say is beyond me.

    Kucinich revealed himself to be just another politician, willing to sell out his principles (?) to the highest bidder.

  • getfitnow

    He needs to just GO AWAY!

  • getfitnow

    Obama is a pathologival liar. He has his memorizing talking points. If he has to divert from those, he can’t remember who he told what, so he covers up with absurd garbage and irrelevent chatter to divert the questioner. Why not? It works so well with the msm. I give Bret both thumbs up. Gues we know why BO hasn’t held a news conference in over 300 days.

  • getfitnow

    Oh, and speaking of Michelle, she’s been pretty quiet lately.
    ***************
    Are you talking about FLOTUS? You need to go to newsbird’s site and see what she’s been wearing lately.

  • getfitnow

    I forgot to write–She’s been flapping her lips about childhood obesity. 

    JUST WORDS!

  • getfitnow

    Did I miss something? When did Hawaii have an earthquake?

  • politicsisdirty

    I love Bret’s show and never missed it. If I can’t watch it live, I record it so I can watch it late in the evening.

    This time though, I can’ t bear to watch the interview. It is just like watching a used car salesman making his pitch. All talking points and lies.

    The way Bret asked straightforward question exposed the Pres for what he is. Thanks Bret.

  • AbigailAdams

    I think the whole point of bo’s appearance on Fox was motivated by his belief that if he can only show himself to the the people they will be overwhelmed by his force of personality (and how historic he is).  It works every time at his other venues, doesn’t it?  If I were king of the world (or Bret) I would have just fainted and gotten it over with.  That would have been my editorial comment.  Oh, and I would have brought my own water bottle.  Can’t imagine anything funnier.

    Seriously, bo had no other motivation for going for an “infomercial” on Fox.  My question to him would have been: “Why did you and your handlers decide to come on Fox after you’ve told the American people that we are not a news (but an entertainment) organization?”

  • sowsear

    Hawaii trying to pass a law that no one can ask to see the BirthCertificate. Too many requests…duh. Then just show the damn thing.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Yeah it awakened alright… In that dense mind of yours…

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Wrong Hokma…just wrong….

  • sowsear

    And He made the sick well….

  • kenoshamarge

    I also thought that Brett Baier did an excellent job. He was respectful at all times but made it clear he wasn’t just going to roll over and play dead like the other interviewers have done.

    Brett said later that confrontational isn’t really his “style” but that he was just trying to get some answers.

    Kudos to Baier. And if the Obots are upset I don’t blame them. A rather mild-mannered journalist made their guy look like a wimp.

    I almost always watch “Special Report” these days. Now I know why.

  • Elliott

    It is 14 pages long with all the corrections, amendments, court orders and affidavits. Hawaii cannot have that much copy paper!

  • Breeze

    arabella trefoil

    He looks terrible. Is is sick? Is he tired? Or does he need a new make-up artist? Why does he looks like he’s covered with Silly Putty 

    ————————————————————————————————–

    No, AT -

    He’s the picture of DORIAN GRAY!!!

    <img style=”margin-top: 8px; width: 32px; height: 32px; margin-left: 8px;” src=”//js-kit.com/avatar/NXDb3_TWixZrw9mTS4c3Je.jpg”/>arabella trefoil

  • Hokma

    Wrong about what?

  • )o(

    “Bret gave the best interview of a sitting Prez—ever!”

    Certainly the best if you compare it to Baier’s interview with Bush in 2006 turned into a documentary called…(wait for it)…
    ‘George W Bush: Fighting to the Finish’
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,324614,00.html
    where Baier compares Dubya with … Abraham Lincoln:
    Bret Baier:
    “We talked a lot about President Lincoln. And there’s going to be a lot of people out there who watch this hour and say, is he trying to equate himself with Lincoln?
    I tell you what – he thinks about Lincoln and the tough times that he had during the Civil War. 600,000 dead. The country essentially hated him when he was leaving office.
    “And the President reflects on that. This is a President who is really reflecting on his place in history.”
    Tough, really tough and principled guy.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Portia… here is my advise to you. Stop walking around with a mattress strapped to your back asking for vounteers. Then go get a life and a brain….

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Hey ~Just Me~ worry about your own edits. I am sure LJ gets the point. Besides it my right to change any posting I submit so go go pull that power play on your spouse or what ever lost its mind to sleep next to you.

  • NAN

    Well first of all I couldn’t get very far into this interview, the first question from the interviewer was if Obama SUPPORTED the Slaughter rule???? And the interviewer tried to get him to answer the question numerous times. HE, Obama never answered his question, Obama was dismissive and EVASIVE in his comment: the concern about “these procedural issues in Congress” (the Slaughter rule)… He never answered the question….WHY? Maybe because HE CAN’T, because quite frankly he doesn’t KNOW what the answer IS. An empty suit. Another Emperor. He is completely CLUELESS.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Braindead Lorac… Another idiot! this is not about “shooting the messenger”.. Its about a visious game that is played by Fox and some of the other outlets. Like I said I have no problem with Baier going after Obama. But I do have a real problem with his selective approach to journalism …

    Just like I have with the idiots at MSNBC and the brain dead at CNN..This has nothing to do with informing the public but its all about ratings!  Bret asked his viewers to send in emails? Why? Is he (and others) to fucking stupid to ask his own intelligent questions? Or was he playing to the Fox Choir?  Is that what journalism has come too?

    Like I said I have no problem with Baier going after Obama. But I do have a real problem with his selectiveness  Just like I have with the idiots at MSNBC and the brain dead at CNN…

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Braindead Lorac… Another idiot! this is not about “shooting the messenger”.. Its about a visious game that is played by Fox and some of the other outlets. Like I said I have no problem with Baier going after Obama. But I do have a real problem with his selective approach to journalism …

    Just like I have with the idiots at MSNBC and the brain dead at CNN..This has nothing to do with informing the public but its all about ratings!  Bret asked his viewers to send in emails? Why? Is he (and others) to fucking stupid to ask his own intelligent questions? Or was he playing to the Fox Choir?  Is that what journalism has come too?

    Like I said I have no problem with Baier going after Obama. But I do have a real problem with his selectiveness  Just like I have with the idiots at MSNBC and the brain dead at CNN…

  • Pingback: Jules Crittenden » Your President Reaches Out

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Nobama? Right! Talking Points? Right? Yes folk we have another winner!

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Distract? Why because you and the Fox minions don’t like what I have to say? Grow Up!

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Cap’n — I think I can safely assume from the tone of your reply that I’ve struck a nerve, come too close to a sensitive issue for you. If you expected your retort to anger or offend me, I must disappoint you. I am, however, bemused by your intent, i.e.  jumping to a sexual connotation to try to insult me. That indicates a certain amount of immaturity and indeed sexual frustration on your part in the sense that it’s uppermost in your thought processes. When you get to Health Services, ask for a counselor as well as a physician. I think you’ll benefit from both.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    AC & Yttik!

    What you guys are the only ones who can throw around the english language as you wish? Get a life! It offended you? If that comment offended you then talk about double standards.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Yittik

    I did not verbally attack anyone mother. I said go tell your story to your momma. Where is the insult? Grow Up.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Yttik

    I did not attack anyones mother… I said go tell your soory story to oyur momma, meaning your mother is the only one who will listen to your sorry ass story. Where did I attack anyones mother?  Grow UP!

  • oowawa

    Earthquake in Hawaii?

    A comment from another site: “I am sure he meant Haiti. I am 3000% sure…”

    You know, Haiti, our 57th state.

  • oowawa

    I think it was O’Reilly who referred to O’s performance as the “rope-a-dope.”  Exactly.  Be elusive and don’t let your opponent land a solid punch.  Evade.

  • oowawa

    “I see,” said the blind man, as he picked up his hammer and saw . . .

  • Seymour

    No Cap’n, I watch MSNBC as well as CNN. Did channel in this interview and I must say this man Baier did a better job than any I have seen on cable or MSM. Baier asked the right questions and they were tough but our President contradicted himself throughout with absolutely no conviction. Obama kept his cool but I can’t help to feel embarrassed as to the lack of knowledge our President has on his own bill. Hillary who was my first choice should put as much distance from Obama has she possibly can. We need her in 2012 and she just can’t afford to have Obama’s stink on her shirt.   
     
    Seymour

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    Last comment from me on this post. I watched the entire interview over an over again.  Now if you give credit to Baier you have to give credit to Obama. First, substance wise it was a good interview. Obama knew he was going up against an opposing news outlet and while he did his dance you have to give him credit for even allowing the interview.

    Baier also did a good job with substance. But he also kicked in the “gotcha” tries and Obama did another round of dancing.

    Once again… its just to bad that Baier did not do the same thing when he sat with Bush rather than snowballing the interview. Baier did the same thing with Rummy and he does the same thing with the Republican House and Senate

    Of course if he had done the “gotcha thing” with either Bush or Rummy he would not be the anchor to Special Report today.Remember when Bret Baier started at Fox he was junior to many of the anchor/reporters at Fox.So as I said when someone sells his soul to the devil ( and that mean’s ANYONE) its hard to get a refund.

    Its just to bad, MSNBC plays to the left, Fox Plays to the right and CNN plays to those in outerspace. So much for heroism in Journalism….

  • lady dawnelle

    Obama has clearly proven he is as PETULANT as GW BUSH and twice as STUBBORN!  oh JOY!  Can we PLEASE PUT A WOMAN in charge for ONCE!! 
    chit we MIGHT get some stuff accomplished even
    grrrrr @ lying thieving BOYS

  • Obama: Dubya 2 Electric Boogaloo

    Same idiocy, only from opposite ends of the spectrum.

  • AbigailAdams

    sparrow, how much longer are you going to bemoan the “unfairness” to bush and his people?  bo is the president today and for the next few years.  You’re comparing bo to the wrong standard, anyway.  It just doesn’t make any sense to compare what may be the lowest performer in the job against the next-lowest performer. 

  • thinker

    Don’t  forger Geraldo Rivera whose standard response is “Presidnet Obama is wise and all knowing, and I trust him to make the right decision.”

  • AC

    Ok Captain, I’ve even liked some of your comments, but now I see you make ad hominem comments at your pleasure.  Find me one instance where I’ve ever made a disparaging comment to you.
    So fuck you and your whore of a mother!

  • Diana L. C.

    Wow!  A lot happened last night.  I missed all this.  I was, instead, cleaning my house now that the Mess Maker in Chief is in AZ golfing.  Come to think of it, I should go to Washington and clean another House; care to come along?

    I got through more of these videos than I expected to get through.  My reaction was this:  Boy and I happy I was NEVER a student in one of the this “Professor’” c;asses. as I would have been totally frustrated.  I probably would have dropped the class and found a different professor, one who could actually answer questions.

    The major thing I got from the health care interview was that O thinks it’s silly to worry about process.  He wants results only, so if we have to do things the Chicago way (or, even if we just have to take the ridiculous methods that have developed in Washington through both Repug and DRat in fighting) he thinks it’s o.k.

    I don’t know about everyone else, but there are a few things I’ve learned in life.  One of them is this:  Things that start out badly, that have to be patched and reworked, etc., generally end badly or never work right.  Process IS important.

    I finally lost it when he went back to his promises to put things out for everyone to see.  Oh yes, I am going to believe another one of those promises because I am an idiot.  ;)

    Obama needs to refine his methods.  He could maybe get a job in a traveling carnival doing sleight-of-hand tricks, fooling teenaged girls he can call “sweetie.”

  • Boxer Mum 06

    Not sure if anyone else has seen the Frost/Nixon movie but watching this interview reminded me of how in the movie Nixon would try to give this rambling answers to soak up time and not really answer the questions. I’m guessing both Brett and Obama watched this movie as well. Great to see Brett stayed in the driver’s seat. Had he not, Obama would still be talking and not saying anything.

  • bamaLV

    would have loved seeing brett baer apologize to his audience for wasting an hour of our time (ala glenn beck/massa incident). of course he couldnt do that but the sheepish look on his face after the interview said it all.   i give him credit for trying though. do wish he would have asked what obama thought of the fact that 79% of americans are opposed to this pos bill. of course obama had no intention of letting brett ask too many questions that he had no answer for so he just bloviated the same b/s we’ve been hearing for a year now and hardly let brett talk.  of the 10,000 questions sent in, brett got to ask maybe 3 or 4.  what a sham this was.

  • Murray

    I saw that somewhere, too getfitnow…BigGovernment.com, maybe?

    The taxpayers had to pay her legal fees, but that was in 2006.

  • bamaLV

    at least fox news has democrats on to defend their positions (whatever that might be) but have you ever seen a republican on chris mathews or keith olbverman? their shows are so one sided that even i, as a former democrat have stopped watching them during the primaries. juan williams and alan colmes(who i just cant bear looking at or listening to)must get a talking points memo from the wh every day since they keep saying the same things over and over, defending their messiah , no matter what he does. its sickening.

  • Docelder

    Lincoln? What is he going for? Another civil war? Another secession movement? A constitutional convention? Maybe that is what he is talking about when he keeps seeing himself as “historic”. But, did Lincoln see himself as “historic”? Did Roosevelt? There is a problem with him trying to “deem” himself as historic. History will do that by itself, if it is warranted. It can’t be forced. Maybe that is the problem, maybe the problem is with his oversized ego. Maybe it is.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    or the lowest taker!

  • whoframedrudy

    “Obama knew he was going up against an opposing news outlet … you have to give him credit for even allowing the interview.”
    But that’s the thing.  Knowing he’s speaking to a Fox audience, he did not address that audience’s concerns.  For example, when Baier hit him with the key question he got in e-mail (“if this bill is so good, why all the sleazeball just to get Democrats to vote for it?”), he doesn’t even try to answer the Fox-style question.  All he said was he gets e-mails in support of ‘healthcare reform.’  So where were all those supporters in Massachusetts–too busy watching Olberman to vote?
    And frankly, he’s a little slow for such a supposedly hot shot Harvard Law Review editor.  For example, Bret did hit him with an unfair question:  he quoted Obama that a President can’t lead with just 50 percent plus one vote, and then snarked about reconciliation, which only needs 50 + 1.  Reconciliation only needs 50 + 1, but in fact the Dems have 50 + 9.  Obama didn’t catch that.  It’s easy to armchair quarterback, but I have seen students in moot court against a panel of 3 judges who wouldn’t miss that.
    And he was unprepared.  He buys his own spin that ‘process doesn’t matter’, so he’s unprepared to answer questions about process?  He gets nailed on the Connecticut question — doesn’t even know what Baier is talking about, let alone whether it’s in or out of the ‘fix-it.’  This is what comes from getting your ass wiped shiny on Meet The Press.  Obama is soft.

  • whoframedrudy

    “Obama knew he was going up against an opposing news outlet … you have to give him credit for even allowing the interview.”
    But that’s the thing.  Knowing he’s speaking to a Fox audience, he did not address that audience’s concerns.  For example, when Baier hit him with the key question he got in e-mail (“if this bill is so good, why all the sleazeball just to get Democrats to vote for it?”), he doesn’t even try to answer the Fox-style question.  All he said was he gets e-mails in support of ‘healthcare reform.’  So where were all those supporters in Massachusetts–too busy watching Olberman to vote?
    And frankly, he’s a little slow for such a supposedly hot shot Harvard Law Review editor.  For example, Bret did hit him with an unfair question:  he quoted Obama that a President can’t lead with just 50 percent plus one vote, and then snarked about reconciliation, which only needs 50 + 1.  Reconciliation only needs 50 + 1, but in fact the Dems have 50 + 9.  Obama didn’t catch that.  It’s easy to armchair quarterback, but I have seen students in moot court against a panel of 3 judges who wouldn’t miss that.
    And he was unprepared.  He buys his own spin that ‘process doesn’t matter’, so he’s unprepared to answer questions about process?  He got nailed on the Connecticut question — doesn’t even know what Baier is talking about, let alone whether it’s in or out of the ‘fix-it.’  This is what comes from getting your ass wiped shiny on Meet The Press.  Obama is soft.
     
    I wouldn’t hire Obama to represent me as an attorney.

  • whoframedrudy

    “Obama knew he was going up against an opposing news outlet … you have to give him credit for even allowing the interview.”
     
    But that’s the thing.  Speaking to a Fox audience, he did not address that audience’s concerns. When Baier hit him with the key e-mail question (“if this bill is so good, why all the sleazeball just to get Democrats to vote for it?”), he doesn’t even try to answer the Fox-style question.  He just says he gets e-mails in support of ‘healthcare reform.’  So where were all those supporters in Massachusetts–too busy watching Olberman to vote?
     
    And frankly, he’s a little slow for such a supposedly hot shot Harvard Law Review editor.  Bret did hit him with an unfair question:  he quoted Obama that a President can’t lead with just 50 percent plus one vote, and then snarked about reconciliation, which only needs 50 + 1.  Reconciliation only needs 50 + 1, but in fact the Dems have 50 + 9.  An easy home run, but he didn’t catch that.  It’s easy to armchair quarterback, but I’ve seen students in moot court against a panel of 3 judges who wouldn’t miss that.
     
    And he was unprepared.  He buys his own spin that ‘process doesn’t matter’, so he’s unprepared to answer questions about process?  He gets nailed on the Connecticut question — doesn’t even know what Baier is talking about, let alone whether it’s in or out of the ‘fix-it.’  This is what comes from getting your ass wiped shiny on Meet The Press.  Obama is soft.
     
    I wouldn’t hire Obama to represent me.

  • Gary Sartori

    Sorry, but I found Baier’s interview highly insulting. He interrupted Obama 16 times, trying to score political points for his network. If Baier wanted to interview Obama, he has every right too, but ask his question, don’t interrupt every 5 minutes. He showed Obama no respect.

  • Breeze

    Thank You, Bret

    creators.com
    David Limbaugh
    <img src=”/img/conservative_comment_button.gif”/>

    I pray that President Barack Obama’s interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier is replayed repeatedly on Fox News Channel and circulated widely on the Internet for all to see. The more who watch it the more people will realize just how drastically the unscripted Obama varies from his projected image as God’s gift to bipartisanship, compromise, congeniality and democracy.

    What came across most glaringly was that there is little he wouldn’t do to force Obamacare on us, from lying to evading to concealing to abusing the legislative process to violating the Constitution to dividing the nation. Consider some highlights.

    Baier asked Obama whether he would support the use of the “Slaughter Rule,” which would deem the bill passed so as to avoid an actual up-or-down vote. Instead of answering the question, Obama mouthed his tired talking points about his plan, most of which were just outright propaganda. He said that his plan would reduce deficits and that costs would decrease for small businesses and families because they would be in the same type of pool congressmen have. But there’s not a chance in Hades that any ordinary American would have such a Cadillac plan.

    For starters, in counting costs, I’m sure he’s not factoring in hidden costs, including taxes. In addition, care would be rationed. Is it for congressmen? People wouldn’t have choices congressmen have and would be forced, eventually, out of their private plans. That’s what would happen under the Senate bill; who cares what would happen under some fictionalized scenario Obama promises under his plan? He has none. This is maddening.

    The closest he came to answering the question was, “I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or the Senate.” Neither did members of the Soviet Politburo when they promulgated their five-year plans. Those rules, Mr. President, are there for a purpose: to protect the interests and the will of the people.

    Without letting Baier follow up, Obama slinked into another whopper: Those who vote against the measure will be voting against health care reform and in favor of the “status quo.” Well, it’s only natural that a guy who doesn’t care about constitutional and legislative “procedure” would so grossly misrepresent this process. First, if he has his way, there will be no vote; that’s what Baier was asking him about. That aside, those who oppose this disaster are not opposing reform and are not safeguarding the status quo.

  • Breeze

    And Obama knows it; he just admitted it a few weeks ago at the health care summit.

    Republicans have put forward numerous plans to reform the system and have always been summarily shot down. Their plans might actually help to curb costs and increase choice and would not involve restructuring and socializing one-sixth of the American economy and tampering with the best health care system in the world and its unparalleled quality of care.

    But Obama couldn’t even be straight about that. He said: “For the vast majority of people, their health care is not going to change. … Yes, it’s one-sixth of the economy. But we’re not transforming one-sixth of the economy all in one fell swoop. … The vast majority of people who have health care — they’re going to be able to keep it.”

    Precisely wrong. He is trying to change it all in one fell swoop. In fact, he condemned Republicans at his summit because they were only offering piecemeal changes while his plan is comprehensive. Truth be told, universal coverage is not Obama’s goal; that’s just a smoke screen. His goal is to expand government — massively and permanently. That’s what he lives for; that’s what he lives on . It’s his oxygen.

    And let’s not forget his absurd misstatement that “the ideas embodied in this legislation are not left (and) they’re not right.” He said they basically track the recommendations of Democrat Tom Daschle and Republicans Bob Dole and Howard Baker. What?

    Bob Dole and Howard Baker might have expressed support for some of this, but they are hardly domestic policy conservatives. But more importantly, the Democrat he cites, Tom Daschle, would be his health and human services head right now but for his tax scandal. Daschle’s 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis,” contains many insidious ideas that found their way into Obamacare. Among those are his notions that doctors must give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners” (read: obey orders from bureaucrats) and that seniors will have to learn to deal with conditions arising from their age rather than receive treatment. And this is centrist, Mr. Obama? I suppose it’s centrist if you consider the federal funding of abortion, which you also lied about, centrist.

    It’s amazing that there is anyone left who can’t recognize the magnitude of his pernicious vision for this country — against which he obviously has an unquenchable grudge.

    Thank you, Bret, for helping to expose it.

    http://www.DavidLimbaugh.com

  • Pingback: “Demon Pass”? : NO QUARTER

  • Pingback: Your President Reaches Out

  • Pingback: Lawyer Don Hecker Headlines » Blog Archive » “Demon Pass”? UPDATED