RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama Says Drill, Baby, Drill?

The New York Times announced that President Obama is now open to offshore drilling.

In today’s Political Punch, ABC’s Jake Tapper helpfully points out some of President Obama’s contradictory statements on the matter while he was campaigning for office, excoriating McCain/Palin for the same positions he now advocates.

According to John Broder of the NY Times:

The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.

The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.

Under the plan, the coastline from New Jersey northward would remain closed to all oil and gas activity. So would the Pacific Coast, from Mexico to the Canadian border.

The environmentally sensitive Bristol Bay in southwestern Alaska would be protected and no drilling would be allowed under the plan, officials said. But large tracts in the Chukchi Sea and Beaufort Sea in the Arctic Ocean north of Alaska — nearly 130 million acres — would be eligible for exploration and drilling after extensive studies.

The proposal is to be announced by President Obama and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on Wednesday, but administration officials agreed to preview the details on the condition that they not be identified.

The proposal is intended to reduce dependence on oil imports, generate revenue from the sale of offshore leases and help win political support for comprehensive energy and climate legislation.

But while Mr. Obama has staked out middle ground on other environmental matters — supporting nuclear power, for example — the sheer breadth of the offshore drilling decision will take some of his supporters aback. And it is no sure thing that it will win support for a climate bill from undecided senators close to the oil industry, like Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, or Mary L. Landrieu, Democrat of Louisiana.

The Senate is expected to take up a climate bill in the next few weeks — the last chance to enact such legislation before midterm election concerns take over.

What I found most amusing were the comments to the New York Times article: I have listed a few of the first of the 818 comments and, as of this writing, by the number of readers recommending each one – you can see that the scales are falling from some people’s eyes:

2. Terrible move. Badly done! What a craven maneuver. He’s too smart not to know how useless and dangerous it is. What Bush/Cheney couldn’t accomplish, Obama pulled off. How absolutely pathetic. Obama should be ashamed of himself.

***Recommended by 287 Readers

3. I knew I was voting for a centrist candidate when I cast my vote for Obama. I knew his environmental policies, though more effective and expansive than his predecessor’s, would surely disappoint a swath of his supporters. But this? Wow. Just — wow. Bending over backwards to acquiesce to your detractors much, Mr. President?

***Recommended by 237 Readers

7. He is looking more and more like bush every day…

***Recommended by 303 Readers

9. This better not be true! He will lose my support and i voted for him. We don’t need more oil we need clean alternative energy and conservation.

***Recommended by 148 Readers

10. drill baby drill!

I was against it, but if Barry is Ok with it then I am too. But I would kind of like to hear him actually say that.

***Recommended by 25 Readers

11. No public option. Intensified drone attacks. Gitmo still open. And now offshore dilling. This is not the same Barak Obama I voted for.

***Recommended by 333 Readers .

14. Excuse me, but is this guy engaging in self satire or is he just trying to see how many positions he can abandon before even his robotic supporters have had enough. Anyone else remember “We can’t drill our way out of this.” Kinda like the total opposition to the individual mandate. Hey Mr. President, may I have my contributions back?

***Recommended by 204 Readers .

18. This is so short-sighted and wrong-headed. The U.S. Energy Information Administration’s own analysis states that: [A]ccess to the Pacific, Atlantic, and eastern Gulf regions would not have a significant impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030.
http://www.eia.doe.gov… Once again, Obama gives away the store, in a futile attempt to gain the favor of people who will never, ever become his allies. Such a waste of our last great opportunities to meaningfully address immensely urgent needs. So very sad for the country and for the planet.

***Recommended by 215 Readers

20. So we can put oil rigs along the American coast but we think that wind turbines just ruin the scenery to much?

***Recommended by 227 Readers

23. I cannot BELIEVE this President would do such a thing and at the same time ask us to go solar and use wind and protect our environment.This is outrageous. A travisty which seems so out of character for this man who seemed to care mightily about the environment. I have supported everything he’s advocated, fought for him. I feel so disappointed, dispirited at this news. EKB

***Recommended by 103 Readers .

24. We should have voted for Hillary in the primaries…

***Recommended by 176 Readers

*************

Once again, President Obama is showing the difference between campaigning and governing. What I can’t figure out is why anyone would have believed his rhetoric in the first place when he did not have a record to back it up.

Whether he is just offering a small carrot to Conservatives in the hopes of passing cap and trade legislation, clearly there is no principle so dearly held that he will not contradict himself on it.

  • donjo

    Odumbo is even dumber than I thought.

  • Diana L. C.

    Ani,

    You said it all: “What I can’t figure out is why anyone would have believed his rhetoric in the first place when he did not have a record to back it up.”  For all those people who voiced their disappointment in this decision by their choice for POTUS, all I can say is this:  “Now admidt you were stupid to believe this man whose many opinions changed constantly during the debates with Hillary.”

  • AC

    “clearly there is no principle so dearly held that he [Obama] will not contradict himself on it.”

    After this Ani, cant see how I could possibly comment other than to wholeheartedly agree.

  • AC

    “clearly there is no principle so dearly held that he [Obama] will not contradict himself on it.”

    After this, Ani how could I possibly comment other than to wholeheartedly agree.

  • TermLimits

    “There are things you can do individually, though, to save energy,”  ”Making sure your tires are properly inflated – simple thing. But we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling – if everybody was just inflating their tires? And getting regular tune-ups? You’d actually save just as much!” 

    This quote was one of my favorite – What an idiot!

  • HARP

    Notice how the drill areas are mostly off the coast of red states.

  • Kathleen Wynne

    The left, again, gives him a pass they did not give to Palin when she campaigned with the slogan “drill baby drill”. 

    I just don’t believe obama is “appeasing” the republicans.  He’s doing whatever is politically expedient to complete an agenda that was set in motion the day the power elite chose him to be the next president back in 2004 when they made an unknown, unaccomplished state senator to be the keynote speaker at the 2004 Democratic Convention. 

    This isn’t about dems vs repubs and obama not showing any backbone.  I wish it was that simple.  This is all about the “puppet”  completing the final phase of enacting a corporate takeover of the U.S. government.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    “Making sure your tires are properly inflated – simple thing. But we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling – if everybody was just inflating their tires?

  • ~~JustMe~~

    LOL TL

  • ~~JustMe~~

    How did we get to where we are today??
    This is serious business? He said it himself. =-O
    Will people get serious in November?

  • TermLimits

    Thanks for the video JM.  I have been reading comments here for about a year, but have not commented until recently, so I’m new at this.  I just can’t sit back and watch what this congress and Obama are doing anymore.  It seems that everyday there is news of something he is contradicting himself on.  It is so sickening.  I believe Pelosi even called offshore drilling a “Hoax” This is crazy.

    Thanks again for the video.

  • Miss Malevolent

    What I want to know is what the Obamabot that always posts here, thinks about this?

    Personally, other than calling him a back dealing hypocrite, Republicans can’t say much to Obama as they have been asking for this for a long time.

    But for the rest of us that had our eyes open all along, this is about as surprsing as Ricky Martin and Sean Hayes announcement that they are gay.

  • don

    No, it is not “Odumbo is even dumber than I thought,” it is the people who listened to and believed the great orator.  Many of us realized he was a snake oil salesman and tried to convince others but we usually ended up being called names.  Obama will do what is most expendient for him and he doesn’t give a damn about the American people. 

  • ces

    I finally got one of those “What’s up with Obama and nukes and drilling?” from a very good friend of mine. I replied with the standard verbose “told you so” explanation. No response yet. :/

    mmmMM mmmm… I love the smell of off shore oil derricks in the morning…

  • Docelder

    He has done in a day what Bush II could have never done in 8 more years. It is incredible. He really is the one. I will admit, now I am torn. The only reasonable explanation is that he is a corporatist. I know he didn’t oppose Nanzi on health care, but we didn’t get any public option but instead a giant corporate power grab. He has bailed out the banks, Wall Street, Insurance, Pharma and now has turned “drill baby drill”… he’s turning into Palin. I am torn. He is a corporatist, which I despise. But he is decimating the far radical left, which I despise more I think. I am thinking I might have to vote for the guy in 2012. I know… crazy talk I know. 8-)

  • ~~JustMe~~

    You’re welcome
    Glad you decided to join in with us!!

  • TeakWoodKite

    11. No public option. Intensified drone attacks. Gitmo still open. And now offshore dilling. This is not the same Barak Obama I voted for.

     This is not the same Barak Obama I voted for.

    (Oh YES IT IS!) If you had only LOOKED!

    You may ask yourself
    How do I work this?
    You may ask yourself
    Where is that large automobile?
    You may tell yourself
    This is not my beautiful house!
    You may tell yourself
    This is not my beautiful wife!

    That one  cracks me up!

    I would like to personally thank all the writers; Ani, LisaB, Rev Amy, Mr. Huey, Grumpy Old Man, Bronwyns Harbor , the”staff”, and Larry Johnson for their endeavors in making number 11 the most insanely hilarious comment EVAH!

  • lorac

    Ani, I especially love your last two paragraphs.  And “welcome back”!  We’ve missed your writing!

  • TermLimits

    I think we can thank the media for getting Obama elected.  I remember writing on CNN and MSNBC, but never getting my comments posted.   Those of us who knew this would happen are of course not surprised, but all we can do now is vote them all out. I’m all for term limits, hence the name of course. Here in NJ I know who I’m voting for.  It’s quite ironic that my senator, Lautenberg, led the investigation into Bush administration paying columnist to report favorably about his policies.  I think a couple of writers were fired. I wonder if Lautenberg is concerned about the media today?  Don’t think so!

  • TeakWoodKite

    Let it rip TermLimits! :)

  • CentralMass

    Actually, that comment of O’s isn’t as half baked as it sounds. I’m too tired to do th emath but according to recent U.S. Geological Survey’s, the amounts of technically recoverable crude at sites like ANWR and the Gulf is small relative to the daily amount of crude that we use in the U.S.  If both of those sites could be tapped tomorrow and they were our only source of crude, we would deplete them both in 3 or 4 years. However ANWR would take a round 25 years to extract the majority of the oil. So conservation methods, including keeping tire inflated would save a signifcant amount of oil each year. Possibly on par with what we might be getting out of ANWR as we tap it over the estimated 25 year period..

    Dowmstic drilling is good for the oil comapanies bottom lines and it would create some jobs. It will however do squat for our long term energy needs.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Wow, Ani, thanks for the post…with the comments.

    And for the last comment, YES, YES YOU SHOULD HAVE VOTED FOR HILLARY.

    But this comment just cracked me up and shows how totally unaware Obama’s promoters were and are.
    A travisty which seems so out of character for this man who seemed to care mightily about the environment. I have supported everything he’s advocated, fought for him. I feel so disappointed, dispirited at this news. EKB “

    EKB isn’t kidding.   Too bad they didn’t bother too look at what Obama did instead of making empty claims on the campaign trail.  This is the idiot who TWICE tried to push the Liquid Coal bill that environmentals were screaming at for 6  months the 2nd time around that it would add so much pollution it would be like replacing every car with a Hummer.

    Of course then there is his all empty record with his energy companies Exelon writing Illinois leg and that he even admitted he ‘would have supported [Bush's]Clear Sky Initiative if Coal companies in Illinois were included but they were mostly western states’.

    And my all time fav, at the debates when asked what he had done personally to help stop global warming, he replied, ‘my campaign just planted [x] trees’.  Then the moderator said “no, I mean you personall” Obama “oh come on, I thought that was pretty good.  Well, I’m thinking about changing some light bulbs with my daughters”.

    Yep, that was Barry’s record on the environment.  But EKB followed his instruction, even though he didn’t do.  I sure hope EKG didn’t turn her thermostat down to 65 freezing her ninnies off when Barry made up for it at 72.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Oh and yes Ani, I don’t know this is to get Conservatives onboard, because I can’t picture any of them supporting his Cap and Trade-Away.  And they already called out how weak the proposals are.

    And funny how he is opening up areas that didn’t want it, like Florida, but isn’t opening up the areas that DO want it, like Alaska.

    And, most already know Obama.  You can’t trust him.  He will most likely renege and now people expect that.  So, they have to wait and see he does it before making a deal.  This guy has so many conditions attached that he would pull it at the drop of a hat.  Just ask some of his fellow Dem’s or all the folks under his bus.  

  • TeakWoodKite

    Somtimes I wonder I am dumber than I thought, for thinking, “Odumbo is even dumber than I thought”.

    Obama is on the lossing end of a Scottish caber toss, greased pole, kilts and all.

    One a serious note (not..snort!)…

    This is an interesting ploy nothing more. You want to shut up the opposition give ‘em what they want with a twist…

  • Docelder

    I must have said it a thousand times… not a socialist, but a corporatist. This is the only thing that reconciles how he could be so much like “Bush”.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Somtimes I wonderif  I am dumber than I thought, for thinking, “Odumbo is even dumber than I thought”.  
     
    Obama is on the lossing end of a Scottish caber toss, greased pole, kilts and all.  
    — 
    One a serious note (not..snort!)… 
     
    This is an interesting ploy nothing more. You want to shut up the opposition give ‘em what they want with a twist…

  • EllenD

    We should have voted for Hillary in the primaries…

    Ya think?

  • EllenD

    Notice how the drill areas are mostly off the coast of red states.

    California thanks you ;)

  • I’m a Linda too

    Miss M, so true, where’s our resident troll?   :)

    But you do realize, the Republicans….some Dem’s and Inde’s actually want more.  Obama is stretching it out over years…after years of studies and won’t open up some of the richest areas.

    I really just see Obama pissing off everyone with this move.

  • Docelder

    The North Slope continues to be the most productive field we have. After decades, the oil still flows up and out of the Earth at 140 degrees without the need for pumping. There is a lot more there. There are abiogenic theories to oil production. Petroleum is found on planets and moons that never had dinosaurs. We have been sold a sack of hooey for decades now about oil being a fixed resource. That being said, there is pollution from using petroleum… not from CO2 either but from actual pollutants.

  • Docelder

    But she was “divisive” and “shrill”. Remember? That must be why she was chosen to SOS.  8-)

  • sandi78

    We did, most of us anyway. Lot of good that did us.

  • ~~JustMe~~


     So conservation methods, including keeping tire inflated would save a significant amount of oil each year.

    Theoretically we could save a tiny percentage IF every car was running on underinflated tires.
    And every car in the country inflated all 4 tires.
    I doubt we would save the amount of oil that Obama stated John McCain would get from drilling under his feet where ever it is in the video above.

  • sybilll

    Isn’t that short-sighted? The same was said when my friends went to work on the Alaska pipeline in the late 70′s. Construction took 2 years. Over 16 billion barrels of oil have been pumped through that pipeline.
    But then again, Fred Smith was nuts when he wanted to launch an overnight delivery package system on a wing, a prayer, his life savings, 7 employees, and ballz of steel.

  • jwrjr

    I would look to see how much in bribes, er, “campaign contributions”, Ozero received from the oil companies.

  • Ani

    Thanks so much — getting my book finished and now working with an editor.  Will hopefully find a publisher for it soon.  I will surely keep everyone posted!

  • Tex-Mex Soup

    control baby, control……………….

  • Ani

    Yep.

  • Ani

    Yeah, I didn’t have much of any comments to make on this current situation myself, because I think the commenters I shared from the Times said it all.  By the way, the ones I posted were the ones that had the MOST agreement by other readers — in the hundreds.  The comments the Times “featured” on their front page were more like the typical propaganda, with very little agreement or “recommendations.”

  • Ani

    I know.  This whole situation is still heartbreaking.

  • Ani

    Well said.  Even when he says he supports off shore drilling, he can’t even do that right.

  • politicsisdirty

    “Actually Obama has a twin brother who looks exactly like him but a centrist!”

    That is the best way to SPIN it obots.

  • No Longer Banned in Beantown

    To quote the Gipper, “Well, there he goes again..”

  • No Longer Banned in Beantown

    Obama getting Cap and Trade in exchange for his energy solution of limited drilling would be like letting Bernie Madoff out of jail if he gave each of his victims 10 bucks.

  • lorac

    Oh!  I hope it’s that book I’m going to buy a case of!  How exciting!

  • Ani

    Lorac,

    Keep your fingers crossed!  I guess my secret wish is that everybody here, and anywhere that I’ve blogged will start the festivities off by each buying a case and sending them out far and wide to their friends!  It’ll be a good start.

    I truly appreciate your support, always, and hope you are well.

  • Freedom Fighter

    I hate to say it, but this is one of those things that I am afraid President Obama had to do. We are not anywhere close to having a viable and sustainable alternative energy source. Wind, solar, and other forms of alternative energy looks good on paper, but in reality they will not be able to replace fossil fuels any time soon. As we all know, fossil fuels are not renewable so they will not last forever, however, our modern civilization depends it. We need to find a viable alternative solution, but tying our own hands on purpose and watch our society crumble is not the answer. I wish there is a better solution, but right now there isn’t.

  • Ani

    However, he has not chosen to drill where we already know there is oil, but is investigating/studying to look for some.  So if as you say, it is necessary, then he might want to start where there is more efficient gain to be had up front.  Forgive me, I don’t have all the states data in front of me — will try to find — but saw this in the news today — areas off shore where they already know oil reserves exist.

  • No Longer Banned in Beantown

    I still have my “Obama Energy Plan” tire pressure guage. It’s not very accurate though.

  • No Longer Banned in Beantown

    You want to shut up the opposition give ‘em what they want with a twist… 

    Empty promises work on suckers like Obots.

    Like the opposition would fall for that. Obama forgets that the smart people did not vote for him.

  • Bonnie Jean Burris

    I can not believe this. Trading the exploration ban for votes on the climate bill (if that is the intention) is counterproductive. Thank you for your post Ani. I have been lurking for a while, but this absolutely makes me ill. (Bonnie AKA Elise)

  • kenoshamarge

    I doubt anyone in the Obama Administration actually thinks that this will gain them some momentum with the right.

    The Republican voters loathe everything the Obama Administration stands for and don’t trust him about anything.(About the only thing I can agree with Republican voters on 100%.)

     Republican pols that stand with Obama stand to suffer the same fate as Gov. Crist in FL. Can’t even give the impression of “hugging” him.

  • Breeze

    This was a slap in the face to Sarah Palin an Alaska.

    Watch how her detractors in Alaska blame her for Obama’s decision.

    Notice to that he cancelled what was already put in place by President Bush, which would have given us Oil sooner.

  • Breeze

    OBAMA PLAN FOR MORE DRILLING WINS FEW FANS

    ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS & GOP ARE CRITICAL WHILE OIL PATCH IS WARY

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/energy/6937779.html

  • Breeze

    DRILLING PLAN OPENS NEW AREAS BUT HALTS ALASKA SALES

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/01/obama-gets-slick-with-oil-gambit/

  • Breeze

    Obama’s “No Drill Baby” Offshore Announcement

    Posted by: Mike’s America
    FloppingAces.com
    April 1, 2010

    Fancy words don’t obscure the fact that Obama continues to ban drilling in huge offshore tracts!

    Even the mainstream “news” media didn’t know quite what to think of Obama’s big announcement Wednesday that he would open new areas to offshore oil drilling.

    ABC’s White House reporter Jake Tapper headlined his piece “Obama: Drill, Baby Drill” but you don’t have to look far beneath the surface to see that while Obama opened new areas to drilling offshore from Virginia, he blocked large sections that the Bush Administration had previously approved for drilling and wants to “study” others that were ripe for exploitation.

    Here are the charts from the Department of the Interior policy announcement. This is what Obama and the Dept. of Interior call a plan which “balances” America’s energy needs with environmental concerns. If this is “balance” I don’t want to be the one riding the teeter totter on the energy needs side:

  • karen for Clinton

    Isn’t it ironic that before there was a Tea Party the left accused Hillary of only having tea parties with foreign leaders when Bill was president.

    They insisted he had more foreign experience since he lived abroad as a child!  And Hillary could have and would have run circles around the bozo.

    His supporters are such fools.  Isn’t it odd how they were touted as smart?

    Dumb as dirt, the lot of them.  No common sense at all. 

  • Breeze

    SEE CHART & THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:

    http://www.floppingaces.net/

  • Breeze

    FROM SARAH PALIN:

    Many Americans fear that President Obama’s new energy proposal is once again “all talk and no real action,” this time in an effort to shore up fading support for the Democrats’ job-killing cap-and-trade (a.k.a. cap-and-tax) proposals. Behind the rhetoric lie new drilling bans and leasing delays; soon to follow are burdensome new environmental regulations. Instead of “drill, baby, drill,” the more you look into this the more you realize it’s “stall, baby, stall.”

    Today the president said he’ll “consider potential areas for development in the mid and south Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico, while studying and protecting sensitive areas in the Arctic.” As the former governor of one of America’s largest energy-producing states, a state oil and gas commissioner, and chair of the nation’s Interstate Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, I’ve seen plenty of such studies. What we need is action — action that results in the job growth and revenue that a robust drilling policy could provide. And let’s not forget that while Interior Department bureaucrats continue to hold up actual offshore drilling from taking place, Russia is moving full steam ahead on Arctic drilling, and China, Russia, and Venezuela are buying leases off the coast of Cuba.

    As an Alaskan, I’m especially disheartened by the new ban on drilling in parts of the 49th state and the cancellation of lease sales in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. These areas contain rich oil and gas reserves whose development is key to our country’s energy security. As I told Secretary Salazar last April, “Arctic exploration and development is a slow, demanding process. Delays or major restrictions in accessing these resources for environmentally responsible development are not in the national interest or the interests of the State of Alaska.”

    I’ve got to call it like I see it: The administration’s sudden interest in offshore drilling is little more than political posturing designed to gain support for job-killing energy legislation soon to come down the pike. I’m confident that GOP senators will not take the bait.

    Next week I’m headed to the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, where I look forward to discussing what “Drill, baby, drill” really means.

  • HC123

    In my opinion its not that Obama feels he will gain with the right.

    He fears increased gas prices before November (it might make Dems look bad), and he knows his brainwashed progressive base will never leave him over this. 

    Its a cult, The man could eat a baby on primetime TV and they would still proclaim him The One. 

  • Docelder

    Yes FF, this is what I and a lot have been saying for a long time. Fossil fuels pollute, yet CO2 is the least of the pollutants produced. I never saw the fixation on CO2 except it tainted the carbon exchange idea for me. Yes look at anybody’s house… take the most frugal of us and solar panels won’t do it right now. We need better and less expensive when mass produced solar technology first. Else, it is foolish to try and convert for the purposes of replacing electricity. Then look at places like Florida… you need air conditioning 10 months of the year else everything electronic in your house will ruin even if you could stand the humidity yourself… your TV and computer can’t as an example. I like the idea of sustainable living, we just aren’t anywhere near able to do it across the board with the technology we have right now. So, to me drill now and instead of buying people inefficient solar panels… fund research into something which will be actualy viable to replace fossil fuels.

  • Docelder

    He can do things in a day that Bush could never do in 8 years and the left gives him a pass on it. The hypocricy is so thick. He is a corporaitist plain and simple. Oil companies are corporations. Wall Street is corporations, banks are corporations, defense contractors are corprations… the Fed is a corporation. He is their man. The left thinks he belongs to them. Not hardly.

  • Docelder

    Obama gained foreign policy experience as a child, yet Hillary gained none as first lady… yes, I remember. Also Palin gained none as the governor of a state that actually borders to Russia. They even turned that into a joke.

  • PortiaElizabeth

    Pretty soon even the Left will see that they’re the Left Behind.

  • karen for Clinton

    You were against it when obama was against it, and you are for it when your leader is for it.  you still don’t see that it is all political maneuvering and he really doesn’t give a rats ass and he really isn’t going to do anything to make things better, he’s just going to sell out to the highest bidder and then take over the industry.  Did you see maxine waters tell the oil companies yesterday that the gov’t  will take over the oil companies and socialize the,?  He wants to nationalize our energy supply.  He wants to have all the eggs in the gov’t basket.  You aren’t the least bit worried he is taking over everything and he is doing it so rapidly and with the millionaire socialists in congress.

    And you are a blithering bot with no opinion of your own.  Whatever obama does you will find a way to support it, even when you had the opposite opinion when he found it convenient to take that stance.

    wake up robots, your leader is a freaking joke.

  • tango

    President Obama said “he’ll consider drilling”.  He didn’t say “he will insist on drilling”, etc.  I think it’s a bone he’s thrown to moderate Republicans knowing that it will never pass that any drilling ever gets done during his Presidency, even if the gets a second term.

    As a person with a spouse in the natural gas business, it takes years of enviornmental studies, public meetings, getting federal, state and local government approval, etc, to get any sort of project done. My husband spent almost 5 years in pre-planning before any ground was broke on his most recent (large) project.  And that was in a state that’s friendly to natural gas pipelines. 

    I just don’t see Obama promising to consider drilling as any real threat to those who oppose drilling, nor any real promise it will be done to those in favor of drilling. 

  • My other site

    That Obama, ya gotta love him–NOT!  This should be the end of his white liberal support.  It won’t go down well in Florida!  First Jeb ruins the Everglades; now Obie is gonna cover the Gulf beaches with oil.  Idiot.

  • My other site

    I think he’s definitely throwing a bone to the Right.  They hate his HC, so he thought he’d start drilling on the coasts.  No liberal wants this.  One of my neices says Obama is just a people pleaser.  I think that about sums it up.

  • My other site

    We aren’t close to having alternative fuel because Obama has not promoted it as promised.  If Hillary had been in the WH, we would have a thriving Green Manufacturing industry by now and electric cars.  There ARE viable alternative fuels, but Bush and Obama are not leaders who will take on the oil industry to bring those fuels forward.  There a tons of other measures that could be taken as well to conserve fossil fuel, but Obama has shown no leadership in direction, either.  He’s established huge social programs by EO, he passed HC by partisan vote, he could do something practical about fuel but the Obama Dems don’t have the political will. 

  • helenk

    I gave mine to my son as a joke. Lets face it backtrack is a very sick joke on the country.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • My other site

    I only disagree on one point.  It’s not with the help of the millionaire socialists.  Obama was put in office with the help of the American Corporate Elite across the board.  Every American should be aware of that.  They were the same people who put George W. Bush in office.  I really wish conservatives would get off this socialist kick and start realizing we are much closer to becoming a FACIST state than anything.

  • My other site

    Recall Obama and install Hillary in the WH!!!

  • helenk

    http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/how-offshore-drilling-affects-us-military/19422217

    How many ways can one man hurt the country? By the end of four years I thing we will find out.

    WOMEN WITH INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERIENCE,MEN WHO SUPPORT THEM AND COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

    PUMAS,BUBBAS,EQUALISTS AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

  • Docelder

    Bush II was never a conservative. Obama was never a progressive. Both are corporatists. Yes, exactly.

  • Onofre’s arm

    Wow, Hillary was going to change the laws of thermodynamics? 

  • Rosa

    I DID!!  I just couldn’t put my mark for the Obama or Mccain  ..If hillary doesn’t run 2012  ,I hope there are good third party candidates…………………I have had it after eight years of bush and now this disaster!  It is tooo much!

  • Diana L. C.

    OOH! YUCK!  I’m a big science fiction fan.  I’ve been watching the replays of the old series called V on the Science Fiction channel and getting a big yuck over the alien evil women with their 80′s big hairstyles.  And then, of course, getting really into the new V. 

    I will be picturing in my mind O opening his big jaw and swallowing a baby now all day long.  SICK, SICK, SICK

    But that doesn’t mean I don’t think you’re not right in your assessment of the mindless obots.

  • oowawa

    “but tying our own hands on purpose and watch our society crumble is not the answer.”

    How do we do that?  Maybe if we use our feet and teeth . . .

  • Freedom Fighter

    She could have passed a law to repeal it.

  • Freedom Fighter

    Fossil fuels gives off very little pollution if burned cleanly and the other by products are scrubbed out like they are supposed to be. Theoretically when you burn hydrocarbons, the end products are carbon dioxide and water, both of which are naturally occuring and essential to life on Earth. The only probelm is that we don’t have enough of it to last a very long time.

  • Docelder

    They also contain some impurities such as sulfur that gives back SO2 which causes acid rain. Not to mention the benzenes which are almost always carcinogenic. Of all the things that come from fossil fuels the CO2 is the most benign. All anybody cares about now is the CO2, now that it has been monetized. See the problem? It’s the monetization of pollution. Once the carbon exchange gets going, we won’t ever get off of fossil fuels. It’s funny to me as an old style republican to be the one worried here about the things in fossil fuels that aren’t CO2. To me CO2 isn’t even a problem, but the other stuff is very serious.

  • Docelder

    It makes sense for example to use the solar energy to heat water for the house. that can be done very low tech and it can be done now much more reasonably than it is being done presently. That might save each household 20-25% which would be huge if everybody had it. But, to make electricity from solar cells right now is very inefficient. It makes mre sense I think to use the solar energy for heat and then use that heat. But, that could change with new technology.

  • lorac

    Ani, people would LOVE to find a PUMA book to buy, if only to validate what happened to Hillary and us all, and there are others who will buy because the MSM didn’t do their job.  And yes, there are PLENTY of people who would welcome a book written by YOU!

    I truly am so excited….

  • lorac

    Obama forgets that the smart people did not vote for him.

    Ha!  Love it!

  • CentralMass

    If I recall the survey numbers put the amount of technically recoverable crude in ANWR at between ~4billion at 95% confidence) and ~14 billion barrels at 5% confidence, with around ~7billion at the 50% confidence point. So the ~7billion barrel figure is a reasonable guess.  We consume 3,389,390,000 barrels of crude/yr to produce just the amount of gasoline alone that we burn. So ANWR represent around 2 years worth of gasoline for the country. We use over 20 million barrels of crude per day in general so ANWR reresent less then a years worth of oil for the country.

    If i recall the amount in the Gulf of Mexico is simlar. Roughly  a years supply of oil for the country.  So over the two decades or so it will take to drill and tap it all it will probably provide some great paying jobs and make the oil companies some money, but the amouint of oil at those sites is not going to solve our energy issues.

    So conserving gasoline by improving mileage by even a few miles per gallon will make that 2 years of gaoline in ANWR go furthur.

  • CentralMass

    Just for the sake of discusiion. The U.S. Geological Survey put the the amount of technically recoverable oil at ANWR at around 7 billion barrels with  a reasobale confidence level.  The expect it to tale rougly 25 years to extract it all. We use around 3.39 billion barrels a year to produce our gasoline in the U.S. So if we use a number like 27 mi.gallon as the average fuel efficiency of the gas burning fleet and increase mileage by say 3 mi/gal by keeping tires inflated and vehicle well maintained, that extra 2 mi/gal will have saved 7 billion barrels of oil in ~21 years. Roughly what we will have pumped out of ANWR.

  • CentralMass

    Just for the sake of discussion. The U.S. Geological Survey puts the amount of technically recoverable crusw at ANWR at around 7 billion barrels with  a reasonable confidence level.  They expect it to take roughly 25 years to extract it all. We use around 3.39 billion barrels a year to produce our gasoline in the U.S. So if we use a number like 27 mi.gallon as the average fuel efficiency of the gas burning fleet and increase mileage by say 3 mi/gal by keeping tires inflated and vehicles well maintained, that extra 3 mi/gal will have saved 7 billion barrels of oil in ~21 years. Roughly what we will have pumped out of ANWR.

  • karen for Clinton

    Harp has posted a list a few times of the 75 members of congress who are members of an american socialist party.  Obama had strong ties his entire life to marxists and they have always supported him.

  • lightacandle

    Ted Kennedy and his poodle, John Kerry, OPPOSED windmills off the MA coast but Kerry is okay with oil rigs off the coast of OTHER states.

    Watta punk Kerry is. He is now consulting with the big oil companies to make sure they are happy with the legislation he (John Kerry), Lindsay Graham and the “lovely” Joe Lieberman write.

  • CentralMass

    I think Kerry has been a lukewarm, in a zero support sort of way, supporter of CapeWind. Though Ted Kennedy actively worked to block it. For the record Scott Brown opposes it as well.

  • CentralMass

    Or in other word he was against CapeWind before he was for it.
    http://www.capewind.org/news915.htm

  • Pingback: Obama Opposed This As Senator: Embraced As President : NO QUARTER

  • wbboei

    With Obama it is always REZKO REDUX—show me the money.  And so it is here.  The man is indifferent to the fate of this country.  It is all about him, him alone.

  • ddjk154