mbt shoes  discount mbt shoes  mbt  lv bags  lv bag  louis vuitton bags
louis vuitton bag  christian louboutin shoes

You have said it

ALL,  SO WELL!!

THANK YOU!!!

http://www.michellesmirror.com/2010/03/addams-family-washington-cast.html

MichelleObama’sMirror.com

bettyann said…

MOTUS, you poor dear. That is one UGLY bunch of people. The rat face over Pelosi’s right shoulder gives me the shivers!!

You are in luck.

It happens that I took up handwriting analysis as a hobby many moons ago. Girls, never trust a man who writes all in caps.

The first thing you need to know about handwriting, is that it is brain print. And it is all common sense. Also, that there are three areas in the analysis – above the base line, on the base line, and below the base line. Above the baseline is the super ego, on the base line the ego, and below the baseline the id. As an example of what this means, have a look at the writing of a teen. They write primarily in larger letters, the writing resting on the base line, filling up the “ego” portion of the brain print. And as we all know, teens are mostly self involved.

At first glance this signature – the signature being his public image (I have yet to see the body of his writing, say a letter written on unlined paper) – portrays an enormous super ego with the over sized caps compared to the ego, or base line. (Here the baseline is created by the brain, because the paper is unlined – more on that later) That’s the first thing you notice when you look at it – the caps are HUGE, and the letters very small by comparison: his “ego” is restrained, shrunken, yet the all important caps are overblown, a huge super ego . In other words, his signature portrays an oxymoron. His public person is by design. How can we be sure? Regard the backward leaning “B”; backward leaning letters are the brian prints of a withholding person – forward leaning writing is a giving, open type, with healthy feelings they do not feel afraid to expose. Obama’s writing flows, however – this guy is very practiced at the persona he exudes.

I analyzed The Won’s signature a year ago, and haven’t seen it again since. The small b striking the center of the O is new. It is also VERY weird. When a line invades the center of letters, like a tongue hanging inside (75% of the time) such as in small a’s, but especially o’s, this is a liar. Think of the forked tongue hanging into the mouth, the open letters being mouths. Next, note how the two words are mashed together. No room between words, as if they are hugging into one another, and this big O desperately clinging to the small b, or body of the word “Obama”, super imposed upon it. This is a person who is unbalanced, due to the discrepancy between the super ego and the ego. He begins his “B” at the bottom of the words, under the baseline, in the id , moving upwards to form the letter: the id is the source of primitive instinct. Obama begins his name with the pen pointing at himself, then proceeds with a huge backward leaning sweep into his super ego. This guy things he is born to be a God.

I am not good enough at this to closely analyze the b striking the heart of the O, I can only tell you that it was not there a year ago. It is strange indeed. I can tell you that his baseline faintly falls away downward, meaning into negative territory. He does not feel the positive about the signing here. It is not level with the paper, but more, it does not have an upward/ uphill slant. Uphill slanting is positive feeling. Straight lines are even, deliberate and thinking, downward slants are depressed brain prints. This signature faintly slants downward.

He should have  immediately followed up with: “but I don’t agree with the
politics and economic philosophy.”  However, the rest of he panel–as I
said–were giggling and putting out one-liners, overriding sensible debate. The whole issue got lost in the crowd.  Krugman seemed uncomfortable to me.

This happens many times on these panel discussions.  It is a free-for-all
format and more, IMO, for entertainment than for true analysis of very
serious issues.  Maybe Krugman will learn to be more assertive as he goes
along.  Signs of the times…we live in a media-hamstrung society. Sigh……

11/2 WHITE

43% ARAB

07% BLACK

00% AA

It reminded me again of teaching a group of kids in our prison town, many of whom had gang banger fathers there in the prison.  One particularly nasty ninth grader would sit in his desk and keep that finger up on his cheek and sometimes on his forehead.  So one day after enduring his next attempt to disrupt the class with some idiotic stupid comment, I asked him to step into the hall with him.

There I told him that of course I knew what he was doing with his finger and that I had decided that, knowing what it means, the next time he did it I would take out a sexual harrassment suit against him because I had lots of witnesses. 

He stopped doing it.