Guess the Blog
By dcmediagirl on August 26, 2008 at 1:37 PM in Current Affairs
Free Republic or Kos/Americablog? Who can tell the difference anymore?
Let’s be clear. I’ve picked my share of fights with some of the inhabitants of Wingnut Blogsylvania. I got into a brawl with Michelle Malkin that got so heated that the Freepers joined in, which achieved the unintended consequence of sending my pageviews through the roof. Vexed by my attack, Malkin honored me with a mention in her book Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild (I was apparently a prime example of an unhinged wild liberal. Cool!). I mocked the trio at Powerline, two of whom at the time were blogging under the hilariously phallic noms de blog Hindrocket and the Big Trunk. I’ve had Freepers insult me and publish personal information about me. I don’t like being hounded by crazy people but I also don’t like cruelty, lies and unfairness. These used to be the hallmarks of the right wing. How far we’ve come in only a few years.
I’ve talked at length on Hour of Power about the lefto blogosphere and have focused my ire on Americablog’s John Aravosis and Daily Kos’s Markos. Here’s why:
Monday, March 03, 2008
What will the Republicans throw at Hillary Clinton in the fall?…surprisingly, still pulling punches with regards to what I write about Hillary. I don’t want to damage Hillary should she become our nominee, as increasingly unlikely as that appears. I don’t want to write about very real scandals in Hillary’s past, scandals that we will be forced to revisit for the next 8 months, and 8 years. I don’t want to write about the rumors about Bill that no one has written about to date, even though the rumors include lots of details which are at least just as true as Obama being a Muslim. While Hillary’s campaign is pushing known lies about Obama, such as the “Muslim” connection, most of the stories about Hillary are anything but lies. They’re real stories that she will have to discuss publicly, again and again and again, to her and our party’s detriment.
You will notice that neither Obama’s campaign nor Obama’s official, or unofficial, surrogates are talking about the Clintons’ past or present scandals, the Clintons’ negatives, what a Clinton run for the presidency will to Democratic congressional races and governor races across the country. The Clintons are counting on the fact that none of us will write about their negatives, because we’re too nice. So they can get as dirty as they want, with impunity.
Well, come Wednesday, if Hillary doesn’t win 65% of the delegates in Ohio and Texas, and still insists on staying in the race and ripping our party in two, it will be time to start treating candidate Clinton with the same golden rule she is using for candidate Obama. Why? Not for revenge, but for the sake of our party and the fall election. Hillary and her campaign are in the process of turning Obama into damaged goods in the fall. They didn’t have to go there, but beating Obama became more important to them than beating John McCain. So, the first question for Hillary come Wednesday, should she decide to continue risking our chances of winning in the fall even though the math says it’s over, will be the question she’s asking Obama today: What negatives will the Republicans throw against you in the fall? And as I’ve noted repeatedly, there are some negatives out there that most of you don’t even know about – but everyone in Washington knows about them, in detail. That’s because even Democrats who don’t love Hillary, don’t go there, for the good of the party. On Wednesday, the good of the party may dictate that we do.
Your liberal blogosphere, threatenting to blackmail a candidate.
But wait, there’s more!
Tuesday Morning Open Thread
Joe Sudbay (DC) · 8/26/2008I’ve been wandering around Denver for a couple days now and haven’t seen any sign of the PUMAs — the diehards who purport to support Hillary, but are really just a bunch of media hogs and losers. From my vantage point here in Denver, it feels like the hype has been overblown.
The Orange Place:
Thank You (8+ / 0-)
Recommended by:Luftmensch, sundancekid11, serrano, SherriG, DJShay, yoduuuh do or do not, Templar, NWTerriD
Okay I’m breathing again. We’re in this for the long haul. I just have to remember that. And I may get to go to Penn and work for Obama with my best friend! Great.But I DREAD the next 6 weeks of Clinton. And I agree. At this point I’ve decided Vince Foster might not have committed suicide and I’m beginning to wonder where Bill’s been getting his nookie and what was that deal with Whitewater again? Could you explain it to me? Unfortunately (fortunately) I know Obama is better than this, but I’m not, and I’m asking.
by woodstockmom on Tue Mar 04, 2008 at 05:19:25 AM PDT
To the best of my knowledge: (2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:sundancekid11, WeBetterWinThisTime
Hillary didn’t personally take a 9mm Glock and blow Vince Foster’s head clean off. …at least as far as I know.It’s the fascism, stupid!
by lastman on Tue Mar 04, 2008 at 05:58:37 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
Foster probably committed suicide… (0+ / 0-)
in his WH office. Hillary likely had the body moved to avoid the bad press. In any case, there are still a lot of unanswered questions here.by Templar on Tue Mar 04, 2008 at 06:50:12 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
(UPDATE FROM LARRY JOHNSON–DCMedia Girl had trouble putting in the block quotes, which gave the unfortunate impression she was endorsing these views. She is not. She is demonstrating that no matter what Hillary does tonight she will be blamed for whatever trouble befalls Obama.)

















