RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

This Is Some Stand-Up White House – Not

During the Primary and Election campaigns, many of us felt that the Obama Campaign was getting Google to do its bidding for specific searches. Evidently, it wasn’t just a wild conspiracy theory, according to this article by Ken Boehm, White House Staffer Who Did Favors For Google Must Resign:

In a letter today to President Obama, I asked for the resignation of White House Deputy Chief Technology Officer Andrew McLaughlin.

Last week, McLaughlin was officially reprimanded for violating its ethics policies. A White House investigation found that McLaughlin, a former senior executive at Google, had repeatedly circumvented both the letter and spirit of White House ethics rules by communicating with former colleagues about Administration policies affecting the company.

The White House confirmed that Mr. McLaughlin used his personal Gmail account when discussing White House business, possibly violating federal archiving rules.

From web privacy to Net neutrality to China’s Internet policies, McLaughlin actively engaged Google’s lobbying team and at least one top company official, in at least one case contradicting the Administration’s public stance.

Well, that last sentence is no surprise to anyone who has really been paying attention. The one area in which Obama has been consistent is saying one thing, and doing another. Back to the article:

In that instance, the Administration was publicly stating that it was fairly and dispassionately evaluating a Court decision that had the potential to materially affect Google. Yet McLaughlin simultaneously leaked highly sensitive material and inside information to a senior Google official via a confidential email that the policy would not change.

President Obama has repeatedly claimed that his Administration would have no tolerance for unethical ‘revolving door’ behavior by officials who are supposed to be working for the taxpayers but instead are granting special access and favors to their former employers. The situation with McLaughlin is a test of President Obama’s ethics commitment.

If the Obama Administration is truly committed to the idea of strict ethical standards McLaughlin’s tenure as a senior official of the Obama White House must end.

So there is that piece – the Obama flunkies using a major search engine as their own personal ad campaign (a bit of hyperbolic license, I admit), but there is yet another, far more serious, infraction by the Obama White House that is clawing its way to the light.

And that would be this, Gibbs Mum On Sestak Job Offer. At first blush, that might not seem like a lot, but in actuality, it is a federal crime:

Don’t ask the White House if Obama aides tried to force Joe Sestak out of the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary by offering him a job. They are keeping mum on the controversy.

Press Secretary Robert Gibbs deflected a barrage of questions about reports – stoked by Sestak himself – that he was offered a top position, perhaps Navy Secretary, in exchange for sitting out the Democratic Senate primary in Pennsylvania.

Sestak didn’t – and upended incumbent Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter on Tuesday night.

“I don’t have anything to add today,” said Gibbs, who was forced to repeat that line several more times under intense questioning during his daily briefing.

Gee, I wonder why Gibbs won’t say anything. First of all, Obama was backing Specter. But it would seem Obama feared the potential loss by Specter to Sestak so much that he offered him a job in the White House if he would back out. The only problems is, though, that’s a felony (actually, three counts for bribery and corruption). And of course, now, Obama has changed his tune:

Sestak, who now has Obama’s support, told a Philadelphia radio station on Wednesday, “Let me just say that both here in Pennsylvania, and down there (Washington), I was called quite a few times… And all I said is look, ‘I felt when a deal is made that it was hurting the Democratic process.’”

Gibbs did say Obama called Specter the night of his loss and left a message. The two finally connected today, but Gibbs didn’t provide details of the conversation.

He said that Obama will continue to back Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) in her upcoming Democratic primary runoff against Bill Halter, but declined to say what form that support would take.

Oh, boy – the possibilities for THAT one just boggles the mind, doesn’t it? Feel free to list all of the ways you think Obama will “support” Sen. Lincoln. Does that mean he’s going to stump for her? If so, she better start sending out resumes today, and hope her time as a US Senator will actually help her get a job outside of DC. Just saying.

Back to Sestak: just in case the White House tries to eradicate any trace of Sestak’s claim of this job offer, there is this:

Just to be clear, this is what Rep. Sestak claimed:

The allegation is that the White House offered Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., a job to abandon his primary challenge against Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa. The allegation first surfaced in an interview in February with Philadelphia television anchor Larry Kane.

Sestak told Kane that he was offered a federal job to exit the race. When Kane asked if the White House offered the position, Sestak replied, “Yes.”

Three felony counts – and that is just with Sestak. Now, is Mr. Transparency going to be held accountable to US Federal Law or not? Judging by his support of a foreign leader trashing our laws here, clearly he could care less about them. But WE should. And we should make damn sure the President of the United States does.

Enough equivocating, Mr. Gibbs. And enough dissembling. If Obama and his Cronies violated Federal law numerous times, they, he, MUST be held to account. This is no small thing. The Press must press on until we get to the bottom of this, and so must Congress. Rep. Issa called for a Special Probe back in March, thinking at the time there was a good chance a prosecutor assigned. Huh. Wonder if he still feels that way.

We need answers. The sooner the better. Answer the damn question already, Gibbs!

  • donjo

     And that’s not all:

    Has Obama created a Social Security ‘death panel’?
    Nieman Watchdog

    President Obama and the leadership in Congress have delegated enormous, unaccountable authority to 18 unrepresentative, inordinately wealthy individuals. The 18 individuals are meeting regularly, in secret, behind closed doors, until safely beyond this year’s mid-term election. If they reach agreement, their proposal will be voted on in December by a lame duck Congress, without the benefit of open hearings and deliberations in the pertinent committees and without the opportunity for open debate and amendment on the floors of the House and Senate. Despite the speed and lack of accountability, the legislation will affect, in substantial ways, every man, woman, and child in this nation.

    Who are these powerful people and what are their views?

    [ . . . ]

    They are the members of President Obama’s newly-formed National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform …lack racial and gender diversity, and more importantly, they lack diversity of opinion. Their mantra is that “everything is on the table,” but their one member who has any expertise with respect to defense spending, for instance, is the CEO of a major defense contractor that devotes millions of dollars each year to lobby Congress for more defense spending.

    “Everything is on the table,” they say, but the members appointed by the minority leaders in the House and Senate have made clear that they do not believe that the problems in this country stem from under-taxing, rather from overspending. The one area that they seem to be in agreement on — and which they are in fact, focusing on like a laser — involves programs that help the middle class and those Americans who are the most vulnerable. Even liberal Senator Richard Durbin has stated, “the bleeding-heart liberals… have to…make real sacrifices to strengthen our nation.”

    The co-chairs, in particular, seem to have a clear agenda. Even before the commission held its first meeting, Erskine Bowles went on record before the North Carolina Bankers’ Association saying that if the Commission doesn’t “mess with Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security … America is going to be a second-rate power” in his lifetime. (And he is already 64!) Alan Simpson, known for giving ugly voice to harsh, ageist stereotypes, described the future of the fiscal commission: “It’ll be a bloodbath. Let me tell you, everything that Bush and Clinton or Obama have suggested with regard to Social Security doesn’t affect anyone over 60, and who are the people howling and bitching the most? The people over 60. This makes no sense. You’ve got to scrub out [of] the equation the AARP, the Committee for the Preservation of Social Security and Medicare, the Gray Panthers, the Pink Panther, the whatever. Those people are lying… [They] don’t care a whit about their grandchildren…not a whit.”    via digby

  • elizabethrc

    The only way this will ever be investigated honestly is if and when the Democrats lose their majority, and it has to be a vetoproof majority.
    Don’t ever count on Dems policing their own.

  • TeakWoodKite

    I wonder if that conversation with Sestak was recorded. Hell of a Potomac Two Step chit to have.

  • oowawa

    “First of all, Obama was backing Specter. But it would seem Obama feared the potential loss by Specter to Sestak so much that he offered him a job in the White House if he would back out.”

    Hmmmm–reminds me of something . . .

    “The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. 6And he said to him, “I will give you all their authority and splendor, for it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. 7So if you worship me, it will all be yours.” (Luke, chapter 4)

  • Docelder

    McLaughlin used his personal Gmail account when discussing White House business, possibly violating federal archiving rules. – I recall some of us bringing that very point up a long time back with the archiving regarding the President and his Barackberry. Those things are encrypted so who is to say that this isn’t used to shield who and where contact is coming from and not just privileged content itself.

  • Docelder

    Obama flunkies using a major search engine as their own personal ad campaign – Google isn’t just a major search engine. They have moved into an advertising media company and they dominate Internet search currently.

  • oowawa

    “Google isn’t just a major search engine.”

    How true.  Google is wonderful, awesome, innovative, and ultimately has the potential of being the most powerful and influential company the world has ever known.  And along with all that comes a flashing red warning: Danger! DANGER!!!
    DANGER!!!

  • oowawa

    “Google isn’t just a major search engine.” 
     
    How true.  Google is wonderful, awesome, innovative, and ultimately has the potential of being the most powerful and influential company the world has ever known.  And along with all that comes a flashing red warning: Danger! DANGER!!! 
    DANGER!!!

  • sowsear

    Obama touting internationalism at Military Academy graduation speech.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/22/AR2010052201586.html

    What else can he do that degrades our country?

  • TeakWoodKite

    PM317 chronicled this very well on NoQuarter. My favorite was attepmting to “google” “Lincoln’s train ride to Washington” and having nothing but Obama “stories” being returned. I had to go 10 pages deep before anything but Obama showed up. I dare say that BO was complict in this.

  • TeakWoodKite

    PM317 chronicled this very well on NoQuarter. My favorite was attempting to “goggle” “Lincoln’s train ride to Washington” and having nothing but Obama “stories” being returned. I had to go 10 pages deep before anything but Obama showed up. I dare say that BO was complicit in this.

  • Docelder

    I always liked Google, I used them from the onset. I still like them and I never thought of them in any possible negative way until now… I am wondering how much power should come to a couple of computer nerds who are setup in the left coast of California. I always thought of the two original Google guys as idealists, but I never saw them as potentially political. The prospect frightens me.

  • sowsear
  • Docelder

    There are astroturfers who specialize in this. It’s called search reputation management. Sites upon site of similar content will be created to bury negative stories. Google doesn’t touch much manually I don’t think, but they let the algorithms handle it. If you have a bot army bookmarking articles and linking them it’s actually easy to do this.

  • Docelder

    See this one? Krauthammer isn’t mincing words about this administration. Speaking of not enforcing federal immgration law in Arizona…

    Charles Krauthammer: “I think it’s a perfect example of the arrogance and the near lawlessness of this administration.”

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/05/22/krauthammer_ice_situation_shows_near_lawlessness_of_obama_admin.html

  • sowsear

    I think that during the primaries and election time Google and Yahoo were suspected of giving out personal info on bloggers. Not sure if any  evidence of that would have survived.

  • Starburst

    Google’s model is (was?) “Do no Harm.”   Yeah, ask Chinese dissidents about that logo. 

  • sowsear

    OT but in the “what have you done for me lately” column, see this:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/20/AR2010052003980.html

  • Breeze

    -

    At West Point, Obama talks
    up national security strategy

     
    Washington Post,
    by Michael D. Shear   

    Original Article

    5/22/2010

    WEST POINT, N.Y. – President Obama on Saturday pledged to shape a new “international order” as part of a national security strategy that emphasizes his belief in global institutions and America’s role in promoting democratic values around the world. Speaking to the graduating class at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point — the ninth wartime commencement in a row, he said — the commander in chief who is leading two foreign wars expressed his faith in cooperation and partnerships to confront the economic, military and environmental challenges….

  • oowawa

    Oh–”new international order”–that’s clearly not the same thing as “New World Order.”

    Is it?

  • oowawa

    What’s really cool is that the “new international order” already has an anthem!

  • oowawa

    Some of the lyrics translated:

    Arise, you who are branded by a curse,
    You, the world’s starving and enslaved!
    Our outraged minds are boiling,
    Ready to lead us into a deadly fight.
    We will destroy this world of violence
    Down to the foundations, and then
    We will build our new world.
    He who was nothing will become everything!

    CHORUS:  |: This will be the final
       and decisive battle.
       With the Internationale
       the human race will arise.

    Only we, the workers of the worldwide
    Great army of labour,
    Have the right to own the land,
    But the parasites – never!
    And if the great thunder rolls
    Over the pack of dogs and executioners,
    For us, the sun will still
    Shine on with its fiery rays.  (+ chorus)

  • sybilll

    Here’s a compilation put together of Sestak saying in no uncertain terms that he was offered a job in exchange for dropping out of the Specter race:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJLejs_0ZR0&feature=player_embedded

  • sybilll

    Of course the MSM is more concerned about the rat AT the White House than the rat that’s IN it. 

  • No Longer Banned in Beantown

    Check this out. The brown skinned Republican Charles Djou is going to win a Congressional seat in Obama’s “Home State” of Hawaii.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/21/republicans-seek-capture-house-seat-obamas-backyard/?test=latestnews

    Those damned racist Republicans will do nothing to stop their racist hatred for Obama. They are even including minoritys in the Party.

    My understanding is that the Republican National Committee profiled Djou and found that he was an outstanding American.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention This Is Some Stand-Up White House – Not : NO QUARTER -- Topsy.com

  • Peggy Sue

    I suspect one place where this “esteemed committee” will not find any room to cut is in our defense budget, which even without the increases the President is asking for is 5x the amount China spends and 10x what Russia lays out.  Yes, the world is a dangerous place but please even Secretary Gates has said the expenditures have entered a runaway phase.

    For your entertainment and a sense of the crazed amount being spent and being requested, Rep, Grayson has a new vid out introducing the War is Making You Poor Act.  I know he’s not popular with many NQ readers, but he’s one of the few who are speaking truth to power right now.  Frankly speaking, I wish we had a dozen more like him.

  • ~~JustMe~~

    O/T
    MSNBC’s Matthews Makes Misogynistic Comment On “Tonight Show”
    http://bit.ly/9KDZJz

  • AbigailAdams

    That’s because matthews himself is a girly man.

  • AC

    oowawa, are you channeling lost in space “danger will robinson”–where’s my head today–in the lettuce patch i guess.

  • sowsear

    What’s new??

  • oowawa

    HaHa–Yep AC, that’s exactly what I was thinking of . . . It wasn’t Robby the Robot of Forbidden Planet, but in the same family for sure.  The Lost In Space robot would be waving its arms and shouting “Danger, Danger” once he got a look at Google . . .

    Who even remembers that stuff anymore?

  • sowsear

    Bo, Felipe, and Harry in pictures…
    BO, always know were the cameras are….

    Also hemlines and borders
    http://www.michellesmirror.com/

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Freaky man more like!

  • Sassy

    Teak, the pundits say that Sestak will walk his comments back, now that he’s in the arms of the democrats. Toomey winning the seat will settle it for me!

  • Sassy

    AC, oowawa has a hammer and sickle for your garden downthread, and music to hum while you work! LOL!

  • Sassy

    sowsear, I’m glad Harry, an American leader, is in that shot….one out of three is better than nothing!

  • sowsear

    what’s that song,,,one out of three ain’t bad?

  • ~~JustMe~~

    got to get that new photo for the Whitehouse wall

  • propertius

    After seeing what crony capitalism has wrought over the last few years, this is actually starting to sound pretty good ;)

  • propertius

    Actually, your translation is the English translation of the Russian translation of the French original. It isn’t either a literal translation of the French or the “official” British or American versions. You can find those here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Internationale

  • ~~JustMe~~

    It’s 2 out of 3 ain’t bad I’m afraid

  • ~~JustMe~~

    It’s 2 out of 3 ain’t bad I’m afraid!

  • oowawa

    I imagine that the more down and out and hopeless you are, the better it sounds.  Hope and Change! 

  • oowawa

    Hank Williams Jr.

  • propertius

    Then again, we might see something a lot more like this:

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/05/schama-are-the-guillotines-being-sharpened.html

    “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche !”

  • Sassy

    HaHa! I hope Bocephus ain’t a fan of BO!

  • TeakWoodKite

    It’s comes down to being a he said, it said. If the conversation is documented in any admitable way, it should be referred to the DOJ. More sand in the eyes of an certian Irishmen.

    The question that should be asked is why Sestak said anything in the first place, if as you suggest he will walk it back…

  • ~~JustMe~~

    Cool, I was thinking of Meat Loaf never heard this one!

  • TeakWoodKite

    So on Friday, when PacMan came up on Googles banner page, how many people stopped working and played….think of alll the lost productivity world wide…..beside the dam theme music is still playin in my fron.

    If that game is not a human version of “A Rat in a Maze”, I do not know what is.

  • sowsear

    Insurance ….

  • FLDemFem

    The only thing needed to “fix” Social Security is to replace the money that has been stolen from the fund by Congress over the years. People pay in a lot more than goes out, at least they have over the years, and Congress looks and sees that the money isn’t needed this year, so they take a few billion for some other project. If insurance companies did that, they would go to jail. It is outright theft. I say never mind “fixing it”, just reimburse the fund for what was stolen out of it..with interest. Then it will be solvent.

  • kenoshamarge

    A dozen more like Grayson? Surely you jest.

  • Sassy

    Amen kenoshamarge. We have an abundance of over-paid, under-handed mouth organs in Washington. I’m singing a different tune!

  • Murray

    My Obamaphile neighbor (retired from government work) said to me yesterday…
    ” I just don’t understand why those Republicans won’t give him a chance!  You know, they just oppose everything he tries to do.”

    For that neighbor to give me an opening is Huge!  I’ll let her dwell on it for a few days.

    Pray for me, I’m goin’ in!
    8-)