Regret ably, though, neither the faux feminist who penned the original article nor I mentioned any works by The Prince of Platitudes.

The first mention of books was made by me in reference to the 21 that Phyllis Schlafly authored.

There is either an abrupt rupture in attention span here or the desperate need to find an argument you are prepped to win. Good luck with both.

“it looks like her major in communications paid off and paid off quite well.”

As McCain’s tethered goat?

The alleged feminists on this thread and commentors to it sing the praises of Palin as a strong woman holding her sway in a man’s world on her own terms.

Segue to the image the helpless, pitiful wretch suffering unspeakable indignity and wailing for Rhett to gallop in to save the day.

Tammy Wynette and Alice Paul are trapped in the same being.

The Clintons are well rid of this lot.

It’s been tried.

But never by your sort.

It is the tragedy of our times that such eloquence has gone unheralded.

Schlafly is a formidable opponent, Grasshopper, one never to be underestimated — but an opponent nonetheless.

So is Palin.

Understand that the distinction is not in kind but only in degree.

History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce.
—-Marx

“A Feminists Argument for McCain’s VP”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/a_feminists_argument_for_mccai.html

“I appreciate your article. But you failed to mention that although organizations like NOW and Emily’s List denounced sexism aimed at Hillary Clinton during the primaries, the Democrat Party Leaders and the Obama Campaign did NOT because it served their purpose (i.e. the sexism helped defeat Hillary Clinton and allowed Dean, Pelosi, Brazile, etc to select their chosen one Obama). And even after Hillary Clinton conceded, Pelosi, other Democratic leaders and Obama would not denounce the sexism Hillary Clinton faced during the primaries. Don’t forget that many party leaders were asking/pushing Hillary Clinton to quit when she was still winning – one of the sexist acts by the Democratic Leaders that angered me the most. So for political reasons (namely wanting Obama to defeat Hillary Clinton) the Democratic Leaders failed to denounce sexism, they did not do right by their biggest constituency – WOMEN. The Democrats let women down because they assumed that scare tactics / threats that Roe vs Wade would be overturned would scare them to vote for Obama. Obama and Democratic leaders assumed women would fall-in line or just “get over it” because we have ovaries and care about abortion rights – they didn’t have to earn our votes or respect because we woman who supported Hillary Clinton would never vote for a Republican. Well this time they miscalculated! My vote will not be taken for granted because of the abortion issue. I will vote for McCain, not because he selected Palin, but because Obama and the Democratic Party doesn’t deserve my vote!

So you can mock the Republicans for their “discovery of sexism” and yes it may be politically driven to denounce and attack those who have aimed their sexism at Sarah Palin but at least they are fighting back, unlike the failure of the Democratic Leaders and Obama campaign. I am thrilled to see Fiorina and other Republican leaders stand up against the revolting sexism aimed at Sarah Palin. Senator Reed’s “shrill” comment and Biden’s “good looking” comment do not represent a good example by Democratic party leaders and are clear indications of their continued failure to women of this country.

I hope NOW stands up to and denounces any and all sexism aimed at Sarah Palin. We may differ on the issues but we are ALL women and we must unite against any sexism regardless of the female candidate’s political party. I will be watching to see what organizations do defend Sarah Palin against sexism and denounce sexism in general when determining future contributions!

Hillary Clinton 2012, McCain 2008, Nobama ever!”

………and when the child Googles Daddy and sees that Daddy didn’t want kids?????