RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Olbermann: “Iraq, President Bush, and ‘sacrifice’”

By SusanUnPC: I just received the daily newsletter for MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann live at 8PM ET tonight. [UPDATE: The text and video are up at MSNBC.] “We’re back, Keith’s back, anchoring from Washington, and he has a Special Comment about the war in Iraq, President Bush, and ‘sacrifice’.” And it promises to be a humdinger:

Here’s the top news story that Keith’s newsletter discusses:

US President George W Bush intends to reveal a new Iraq strategy within days, the BBC has learned. The speech will reveal a plan to send more US troops to Iraq to focus on ways of bringing greater security, rather than training Iraqi forces. The move comes with figures from Iraqi ministries suggesting that deaths among civilians are at record highs.

The BBC was told by a senior administration source that the speech setting out changes in Mr. Bush’s Iraq policy is likely to come in the middle of next week. Its central theme will be sacrifice. The speech, the BBC has been told, involves increasing troop numbers. The exact mission of the extra troops in Iraq is still under discussion, according to officials, but it is likely to focus on providing security rather than training Iraqi forces.

Keith’s source: BBC

UPDATE: Add to Keith’s revelations and observations tonight, this Reuters Alternet analytical piece today:

ANALYSIS-Iraqis see U.S. push against Sadr’s Mehdi Army

By Mariam Karouny

BAGHDAD, Jan 1 (Reuters) – U.S.-led forces are likely to launch a limited New Year offensive against Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s Mehdi Army militia, blamed for sectarian death squad killings, senior Iraqi officials say.

The Pentagon, in a report last month, described Mehdi Army militias as the biggest threat to Iraq’s security and diplomats say Washington is impatient to confront them.

Several officials in the Shi’ite political parties that dominate Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s unity government also say they are losing patience with Sadr’s supporters and predict more raids like last week’s joint U.S.-Iraqi operation in which a senior Sadr aide was killed.

“There will be limited and targeted operations against members of the Mehdi Army,” a senior Shi’ite official told Reuters. “The ground is full of surprises but we think around Jan. 5 there will be some operations. I can say no more.”

British forces in the southern oil province of Basra have also been conducting major raids against groups they describe as “rogue Mehdi Army”, some entrenched in Iraqi police units.

Last week, British troops blew up the headquarters of Basra’s Major Crimes Unit and said they freed tortured prisoners.

“The Americans want a war with the Mehdi Army,” said a Western diplomat in Baghdad, who is not American or British.

“They want to get rid of the militia and it seems they will succeed in getting one.”

MALIKI BOLSTERED

[...]

But Maliki’s fragile authority among his fellow Shi’ite’s has been bolstered by Saturday’s hanging of Saddam Hussein, whose Sunni-led administration oppressed the Shi’ite majority. …

Read all.

Among other topics, Keith will also discuss:

BAGHDAD, Iraq – Hundreds of Sunni Arabs gathered to show their anger and grief for Saddam Hussein on Tuesday as the Iraqi government promised an investigation into illicitly filmed footage of Shiite officials taunting him on the gallows. The sectarian passions that have pushed Iraq toward civil war could be further inflamed by the video of the execution, apparently shot on a mobile phone, showing people chanting the name of Shiite cleric and militia leader Muqtada al-Sadr.

Source: MSNBC

UPDATE #2: I got this Rick Jacobs post from Howie in Seattle today, and it’s so pertinent, I can’t help but add it. Especially as a dedicated Howard Dean supporter, I remember how Dean was viciously attacked and ridiculed for his remarks — and how DAMN RIGHT HE WAS. Dean’s supporters KNEW it then, just as so many more know it now:

Howard Dean in December 2003: The US is No Safer with Saddam in Captivity than Before. And Now?

Just over three years ago, then Democratic front-runner Howard Dean made a major foreign policy address here in Los Angeles designed to show the “establishment” that he understood the world and could successfully lead our nation. Having listened to his advisers, consulted many leading politicians and foreign policy experts, Governor Dean inserted one last sentence by hand into his carefully crafted speech.

Just days after Saddam Hussein was found hiding in a hole in the ground in December 2003, Dean said in that speech, “The United States is no safer today, after capturing Saddam Hussein, than we were before he was captured.”

[...]

Dean’s candidacy catapulted to near coronation by an otherwise disdainful media corps precisely because he alone of any major candidate opposed the war from the outset. He gained unflinching grassroots support that translated into historic amounts of money, nearly all from small donors, because he literally spoke truth to power. While on the one hand he questioned the essence of our government’s social contract with its citizens by its persistent unwillingness to provide access to good healthcare for all of our people, on the other hand he questioned the president’s essential competence by underscoring the lunacy in positing that just imprisoning a deposed dictator would ipso facto make America safer. Dean’s rivals for the nomination, including the one who ultimately received it, joined Joe Lieberman in decrying the former Vermont Governor’s naïveté for calling bullshit to the president’s continued wanderings in the labyrinth of Iraq’s growing civil war.

Most regrettably, this weekend’s confluence of Saddam’s execution with passing the 3,000 mark in the number of American soldiers dead in Iraq proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Dean was right three years ago. At the time Dean made his much-criticized remark, about 500 American’s had died in Iraq. Five times that many have died since. And this does not include hundreds of dead American contractors, and tens of thousands of dead Iraqis. …

  • Chris Marlowe

    This is just f***ing great!

    We can’t train Maliki’s army and police because they are basically Sadrist death squads, kidnapping innocent civilians from the streets of Baghdad and other cities if they have Sunni sounding names, then torturing and killing them.

    So instead President Bush is going to send more Americans into this meat-grinder/hornet’s nest to “provide greater security”. How are they going to make things better? By holding another f***ing meaningless election?

    There aren’t enough Americans to pacify Iraq, but there are enough to be more targets for all sides. The different Iraqi factions agree on very little, but the one thing they do agree on, along with Iraqi civilians, is that they DO NOT want Americans occupying THEIR country.

    Before it was the Sunnis who turned to the US armed forces for protection, but now with the Saddam lynching video, they are convinced that we are in cahoots with the Sadrists against them.

    You call this a “policy” with “clearly defined goals”?

    This just shows that the President has no intention of withdrawing from Iraq until “victory”, whatever that is.

    Can someone please explain to me what the definition of an American victory is in a raging sectarian Iraqi civil war while ethnic cleansing is going on?

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    Now, Chris. You haven’t stated what you’re willing to “sacrifice” for Bush’s victory.

    From the BBC quote on Bush’s speech in Keith’s newsletter: “Its central theme will be sacrifice.”

    WTF does that mean? He keeps telling us to go shopping (see post immediately below for how effective that strategerie is).

  • lester

    I got to a far far right blog called polipundit. even the main poster there is now firmly anti war. These aren’t “realist” types. they are to the right of Tom Delay and annoying as hell hannity clones. Basically, the concern is with the military side in terms of it being stretched too thin, not really the political side. A new side to the anti war movement, demented evangelical FOX watching GOP style antiwar

  • Leslie

    Well see Susan,
    The sacrifice will be “unwinning” Afghanistan and Iraq, followed shortly by unwinning in Iran. This way English majors will no longer have to argue whether Iraq is in a civil war or not, or parse the meaning of “ethnic cleansing.” It’s a very clever strategy because we can’t fail to surge unwinningly.

  • Leslie

    Oh, by the way, should we go shopping in Euros?

  • Leslie

    I’m willing to sacrifice Bush’s daughters.

  • Shirin

    Leslie, THAT’s no sacrifice! That’s a gain for most of us.

  • Chris Marlowe

    Saddam said in his will that he would “sacrifice” himself for Iraq.

    So is President Bush going to sacrifice himself the same way as Saddam for Iraq too?

    Poor George, he is unable to outwit a dead dictator.

    James Wolcott has a good take at:
    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/blogs/wolcott/2007/01/digby_relays_re.html

    I’m willing to bet that George has a deal with McCain for a pardon in 2009 if McCain becomes president. Now that’s a good reason not to vote for McCain!

  • lester

    I’m not at all willing to sacrafaise lindsey lohan or Scarlett johansen

  • Sheerahkahn

    Sooo, am I the only one asking this question, or has it floated to the top of many a thought but fear of the answer keeps it from being printed?

    Where are these “extra troops” coming from for this “surge”?

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    They’re fast-circuiting the rotation, Sheerahkahn, which military people say will wreak havoc. They’ll also “fast track” soldiers through training.

    In other words, it’s OKAY!

    Lester, Lindsey Lohan?

    Shirin, that’s just plain cruel!

  • Chris Marlowe

    The military is talking about dropping the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy so that openly gay and lesbian individuals can join the military.

    I don’t see how that is going to help though…

    Why not just take prisoners in the country’s jails and surge them? There are 7M, and they could be given weapons and one-way tickets to Iraq.

    I’m sure you remember the movie “The Dirty Dozen” This could be “The Dirty 7M”.

  • Shirin

    “Shirin, that’s just plain cruel!”

    Yeah – ain’t it great?!

  • Sheerahkahn

    “They’ll also “fast track” soldiers through training.”

    “fast track” through training?
    Do you have a quotable source for this?*
    ::*see note::

    wtf? We’ve got problems on top of problems with undertrained troopers and now this?
    The Marines will never stand for it…they better not!

    Note: Please, for the love of G-d, Country, and all that is Good and Holy say you don’t have a source for this and you pulled it out of thin air to scare me.

  • Shirin

    Sheerah, I have heard the same thing a few times from media sources, so I am afraid it is true.

    Honestly, the only hope – and it’s a thin one – is that there appears to be considerable opposition in Congress to this whole scheme. On the other hand, there was A LOT of opposition on the part of the Generals commanding the debacle in Iraq until Gates got his hands on them, and now they’re as tame as little kitty cats.

  • 1watt

    Saw this early today. Sec. Rice has held secret mtgs. Article lists the demands of the Iraqi Insurgens (resistance), Rice seems to be admiting blunders w/ aproval of W.H.. Idiots are still in charge. Just dress up the dumbass take him to chuckie shees & tell he he won.

    http://conflictsforum.org/2007/rices-stillborn-talks-with-the-iraqi-resistance/

  • Leslie

    Can’t we ask Bush to defer his decision to make a decision a little longer?

  • Donovan Fraser

    When is the point that this idiot and his crew are marched out of the oval office??When do the generals finally stop this nut case from doing anymore harm?? Or do we just continue to follow insane orders the likes that haven’t been followed since Hitler? Are we to be like “good Germans”?
    Jesus people…. wake the fuck up!!!!!

  • Brenda Stewart

    I watched Keith and I love that man!!!! He had a hard time controling his anger in the end.. I want to hear him speak each and every night just like he did tonight and of ofcourse other nights. He is the only one out there that can make sense of thsi mess. He calls it like he sees it and he is right all the way. God how I love the way he comments on this mess….

    Thanks for the heads up, Susan. I would not have missed this for anything.

    I think it is time for a rebelion from the people. That is what it calls for in the constitution…YOu folks here are a hoot tonight….I love the way you think….hugs

  • Chris Marlowe

    W’s coterie of thugs can’t do any better than call this new plan “Surge and Accelerate”.

    I call it “Surge and Accelerate American Casualties”.

    Sacrifice? What have those 3,002 American casualties done? What about the 20K+ wounded? And the thousands more who will suffer permanent psychological damage, being unable to hold meaningful jobs for the rest of their lives?

    And what about the 600+ K Iraqis who have died, most of whom have done nothing to deserve their deaths, and the 24M living in that hell which is now Iraq, plus the 2M+ who have had to become refugees because of this war?

    And this man, who has done nothing more in his life than defend Texas from air raids by the North Vietnamese Air Force, has the nerve to ask for MORE sacrifice!

    HELL NO!

  • Waiting in Texas

    Legally, can the Joint Chiefs of Staff remove Bush and Cheney from office?

  • qurios

    Just watched the Special Comment. Great! As usual.

    My concern is that, at this point, the whole “sacrifice” thing is still hearsay. Even if the hearsay were accurate, if enough people pull Bush up on it, he could always shift gears before the big speech, and say something else at the last minute, thus discrediting all these focal points of opposition, Mr. Olbermann among them.

    Then of course Bush could later reintroduce the concept under some other moniker, and even when it’s picked up on as just repackaging, this time around it would be lost in the ever accelerating news cycle that would treat the whole thing as old news, and Bush once again just does whatever he damn well pleases, with no accountability.

  • http://colorado-bob.blogspot.com/ Colorado Bob

    Waiting ….. NO They can’t … The Romans found that was a poor way to pick a government.

  • Mr.Murder

    Frontline re-aired its story on the WMD lies and the war propagators such as Powell and Rumsfeld and Cheney.

    It’s about to be subpoenae time. Democrats got Congress back.

    Rove’s handling of ‘Katrina relief,’ Cheney’s ‘energy task force,’ and other scandals will dot the landscape…

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    Mr. M, I’m recording that Frontline on Cheney’s dark side … saw it the first time, and feel I should rewatch it, no matter how much that man gives me the WILLIES.

    Henry Waxman is readying himself. He’ll be dynamite.

    Keith injected so much into his commentary, including that $125 million courthouse at Guantanamo complete with restaurants. WTF? He nailed it — that this is all to enrich W’s corporate buddies.

    FOR ANY WHO MAY HAVE MISSED IT, here’s the link to the TEXT + video:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16442767/

  • Horton Heath

    “It’s about to be subpoenae time. Democrats got Congress back.”

    If they weren’t testicularly challenged lapdogs of the oligarchy, you’d have a point.

  • shargash

    The military is also talking about letting non-citizen, non-residents sign up, the reward being a fast-path to citizenship. I’m not sure if the French Foreign or Roman Legions come more to my mind on hearing that.

    You know, back in the day when I was subject to the draft for an unpopular war, one of the arguments in favor of an all-volunteer army was that it would tend to discourage the government from engaging in stupid wars. If we ever again got involved in a hopeless, stupid quagmire like Vietnam, the argument went, the government would find it difficult to get enough people to volunteer to fight the war.

    William Lind (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Lind) has suggested there will be a mutiny in the US military in 2007 (sorry, can’t find a link to the quote). That sounds distinctly possible to me, especially if the surge comes from short-circuiting rotations.

  • oldtree

    it would be very enlightening to see where the troops he thinks are going to move to the desert are coming from

    korea? so we are giving SK to the North?
    japan? are they ready to do it all?

    perhaps there is a map of deployments that would give us an idea of where we are going to get them?

    the report yesterday said private police now outnumber the regular ones, over 2:1. military gone out country, martial law, private military and police

    does this warranty the national debate, or debacle?

  • ecclOneNine

    “Henry Waxman is readying himself. He’ll be dynamite.” I sure hope so, but…

    Maybe I’m just too negative, yet as much as I’d love to see justice served, I simply cannot get excited about it. I sure hope HW et al. tear ‘em up. I’m just not convinced there really has been the sea change in Congress that the numbers show from the last election. Too many still are beholden I fear to those that butter their K Street bread, rather than those that voted them into office.

    My cynicism tells me that we will witness a couple of months of sound and fury, but in the end it will be significant of nothing. Though this was how Shakespeare described life, it also applies to the pageantry of governance, as it too is mostly a tale told by an idiot.

    We will have various commissions, hearings, etc., unearthing mountains of fetid offenses, but failing to ever reach critical mass in the public eye. Although the blogosphere will be alive with all this, if history is prophet, it will just fail at the MSM level, where unfortunately most Americans still look for the last word on things. While this is changing, from my experience MOST people are not reading the blogs (thank God for Olbermann, as he distills the essence so superbly, and delivers in a manner that stirs all walks of humanity) (and thank God also for Stewart and Colbert).

    TomDispatch has a good read yesterday that sums up my sentiments. http://tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=152999 The gist being that the path we are taking has already been chosen for us, and largely unbeknownst to us.

    Is all hopeless? I don’t believe so. And the last elections clearly show a hunger for change from the general public. But it is by no means a done deal. The electorate must hold these elected officials to the coals. If they dare to Specter-ize us (i.e., his reprehensible playing one way to the crowd, but capitulating in his vote, where it mattered), the public must have this brought into focus daily and resolutely. Thus it is a team effort from the least significant voices in comments sections, to the more prominent bloggers and alt news sites, to those that can exploit the non-written media at the “mainstream” level.

    At the end of the day, these individuals that have so much power maintain it by a carefully constructed frame of enablers and opportunists, each with their own reasons for playing along, willing or coerced, carroted or sticked. But the frame is still ultimately a house of cards. When truth is shone unwaveringly and fully, consciences may still be pricked with anyone able to do a John Dean, and it doesn’t take many cards removed to bring the whole thing down.

    So thank you, Susan, for your efforts to this end, and I hope Waxman, Reid, Pelosi and the rest prove me wrong.

  • Sheerahkahn

    I strongly urge everyone here to write to your respective state senators to oppose Bush and his “surge” plan. Bush needs to be brought to heel before he ruins us all.

  • Leslie

    Agree Sherrahkahn,
    Plus also write to House members and letters to the editor in the media.

  • Tap Duncan

    I swear to whoever, that this shit has got to stop!!!! Keith Olbermann is the only television broadcaster out there with the balls to call a spade a spade!!! Where are the level headed “journalist’s”?
    As a former Marine who wasn’t afraid to tell my commanding officers that I thought they were full of shit, I find so much relief in him. This president is full of SHIT!!! His whole life is about politics, no if’s and’s or but’s!!! He is a first class turd pollisher!
    He takes mediocre people and polishes them up to make them seem like more than what they are, but alas, they are just the same as he is–a shiny turd!! God please have mercy on the souls of my military brothers and sisters for they had no choice in what they had to go and do–Tap

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    Tap, I love your passion. And you have the background to speak up more than most of us.

    + + + Btw, Keith tonight, via his newsletter:

    Bush urging bipartisanship in a WSJ op-ed.

    But the 20,000 troop surge proposal, likely imminent, will obviously be the definitive issue about which the President and the new congress will square off.
    How should the Democrats handle this?

    Analysis and reaction from Howard Fineman and John Dean.

  • Sheerahkahn

    “How should the Democrats handle this?”

    I got a suggestion for the Democrats in how they can handle this:

    “Dear Mr. Bush,
    This is a courtesy letter to let you know we will be unable to attend your speech due to our incredibly busy schedule of ripping you and your Administration a new one.
    Yours truly,
    Congress.

    PS: Also, with this letter consider yourself served. You and Shotgun are going to need lawyers.”

  • Thinker

    Susan, happy new year.

    Though I guess it is important to perpetually expose the incompetence of Bush’s “grand vision”, I for one would love to hear on how the new Democratic guard have affected things, however minor.

    There is not debate who is the winner in the pissing contest. Not a bit of cheers with the NY I think will perk everyone up.

  • No Exit

    ‘”The Americans want a war with the Mehdi Army,” said a Western diplomat in Baghdad, who is not American or British.’

    WHY CAN’T THEY SAY WHAT COUNTRY THIS “WESTERN DIPLOMAT” (who presumes to speak for “the Americans”) IS FROM????

    I want to know!!!

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    Thinker, happy new year to you too! (I think your new year started long before mine.)

    You will be glad to see that, at the latter part of my new piece today, I included a lot about what the Senate Democrats will be doing. Couldn’t include it all, but I did cover some of what Armed Services and Select Intelligence committees are planning.

    Of note re this post: I heard last night that Bush will speak on Tuesday and that Carl Levin, the new chair of the Armed Services committee, will have Robert Gates appear before the commitee on Thursday… and that Levin is planning to go after Bush’s whatever-it-is-just-save-my-ego proposals.

    Of course, as I heard on Olbermann last night, Bush can order his surge, his sacrifice, etc. for Iraq, and there isn’t a hell of a lot the Dems can do to stop him. It was Rep. Barney Frank who said that.

    And Franks explained WHY the Dems really can’t even withhold monies from Bush because Bush can find the money he needs:

    TRANSCRIPT:
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16469531/

    And Leslie added a comment with lots of fascinating news.

  • Leslie

    Yeah Susan,
    Saw Barney Franks on Olbermann last night too. It was important to hear Franks say that there wasn’t much the Dems could do about an escalation other than protest. Because, last night, RawStory.com had something up about how Senator Reid, Lieberman and Silvestre Reyes will probably go along with Bush on the escalation. And I was thinking WTF?!

    Probably the best the Democrats can do is hold lots of investigations. But they won’t be able to stop the escalation. Franks said the 2007 Pentagon budget had already been approved. Bush may not even ask for Congressional approval, and a lot of the war is being funded through supplementals. What are the Democrats going to do: deny the troops supplies and equipment?

  • Thinker

    Susan; good to see that the rhetoric is moving to the Dems being forced to expose their balls.

    Lets hope they are big and hairy. Tinpot dictators [even elected] tend to attend the cowards church. Is poodle Blair a born again?