<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lefties Need a Panic Room (or maybe a padded room?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newly Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698923</link>
		<dc:creator>Newly Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698923</guid>
		<description>THIS must be repeated!





&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I mentioned the same thing earlier on another post. It is highly suspicious that not only does he not have people available from his past, but that no one in the media has gone looking.
Gov Palin has been on the scene such a short time and I have seen friends, family, co workers, constituents, and schoolmates of hers.
In contrast..&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS must be repeated!</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>I mentioned the same thing earlier on another post. It is highly suspicious that not only does he not have people available from his past, but that no one in the media has gone looking.<br />
Gov Palin has been on the scene such a short time and I have seen friends, family, co workers, constituents, and schoolmates of hers.<br />
In contrast..</strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DancingOpossum</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698728</link>
		<dc:creator>DancingOpossum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698728</guid>
		<description>I wonder if we could do a &quot;stages of grief&quot; intervention for the OFB like they sneeringly kept saying we needed. Or should we just tell them to &quot;get over it&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if we could do a &#8220;stages of grief&#8221; intervention for the OFB like they sneeringly kept saying we needed. Or should we just tell them to &#8220;get over it&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newly Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698620</link>
		<dc:creator>Newly Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698620</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Fuck Colbert. Fuck the Dems Fuck these so-called feminist spokeswomen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;




&lt;strong&gt;Really!!





Pardon me for saying it like this, but where were the majority of these fake &quot;feminist&quot; bitches when Hillary was being raked over the coals by half of the Democrat party &amp; the MSM during the primary this year?





Only a FEW feminists came to Hillary&#039;s defense.






Now - like roaches from under the woodwork - here they come en masse to attack Sarah Palin.  Getting their digs in on her just like the sexist dogs in the media and the Dem party.&lt;/strong&gt;






&lt;blockquote&gt;Not once do these Obama followers take a good hard look in the mirror.

Not once do these Obama followers consider that — through thuggery and vicious attacks — they beat down the very best, most qualified, most knowledgeable, and most experienced candidate AND every one of us, her still-devoted supporters.

They just don’t get it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;




&lt;strong&gt;They&#039;re too damned arrogant, self-centered and narrow-minded to get it.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Fuck Colbert. Fuck the Dems Fuck these so-called feminist spokeswomen.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Really!!</p>
<p>Pardon me for saying it like this, but where were the majority of these fake &#8220;feminist&#8221; bitches when Hillary was being raked over the coals by half of the Democrat party &amp; the MSM during the primary this year?</p>
<p>Only a FEW feminists came to Hillary&#8217;s defense.</p>
<p>Now &#8211; like roaches from under the woodwork &#8211; here they come en masse to attack Sarah Palin.  Getting their digs in on her just like the sexist dogs in the media and the Dem party.</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Not once do these Obama followers take a good hard look in the mirror.</p>
<p>Not once do these Obama followers consider that — through thuggery and vicious attacks — they beat down the very best, most qualified, most knowledgeable, and most experienced candidate AND every one of us, her still-devoted supporters.</p>
<p>They just don’t get it.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>They&#8217;re too damned arrogant, self-centered and narrow-minded to get it.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698513</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698513</guid>
		<description>SO, WHY DID HE IGNORE HIS OWN OPINION AND RUSH INTO IT LAST YEAR??

Because his collective (Ayers, Axelrod, The Chicago Machine, Teddy Kennedy et al) decided this was the year

- Obama is such a puppet.

And a big fat LOL @ his supporters who really thought he would win the White House.

LOL again.

Nope. 

No way, now how, no Obama. Biden? LMAO


Hillary 2012  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO, WHY DID HE IGNORE HIS OWN OPINION AND RUSH INTO IT LAST YEAR??</p>
<p>Because his collective (Ayers, Axelrod, The Chicago Machine, Teddy Kennedy et al) decided this was the year</p>
<p>- Obama is such a puppet.</p>
<p>And a big fat LOL @ his supporters who really thought he would win the White House.</p>
<p>LOL again.</p>
<p>Nope. </p>
<p>No way, now how, no Obama. Biden? LMAO</p>
<p>Hillary 2012  <img src='http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698446</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698446</guid>
		<description>Lou is back on CNN. He started back last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou is back on CNN. He started back last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndianaDem</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698379</link>
		<dc:creator>IndianaDem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698379</guid>
		<description>America may be conservative-leaning, but far-right  Christian republicans aren&#039;t my idea of &quot;conservative&quot;.  My brand of conservativism is based on the Constitution, not the bible.  My brand of conservativism suggests Christian fundamentalists are free to &lt;em&gt;practice&lt;/em&gt; their religion, not &lt;em&gt;impose&lt;/em&gt; their own biblical interpretations on the rest of us.  

I haven&#039;t seen a republican &lt;em&gt;fiscal&lt;/em&gt; conservative since the 1950s.  True fiscal conservativism is based on a few simple, self-evident rules, founded in common sense.  One of the most basic is that you can&#039;t spend more than you bring in.  

I approve of Obama&#039;s reassertion of basic democratic social values.  What a lot of people don&#039;t seem to recognize is that fiscal common sense is part of the same message.  &lt;strong&gt;Obama points out that if we want public works and social programs for the betterment of the nation and for the common good, we&#039;ve got to &lt;em&gt;pay&lt;/em&gt; for them.&lt;/strong&gt;  He suggests that those who have benefitted the most from our economic system should be willing to bear a larger portion of that cost.  

&lt;strong&gt;This is not radical thinking.&lt;/strong&gt;  This is straight talk, simple justice, and economic common sense.  In a society where the richest 10% own over 71% of the total wealth of the nation while the poorest 60% own less than 4%, the richest can &lt;em&gt;afford&lt;/em&gt; to pay more, &lt;em&gt;and have a moral obligation to do so&lt;/em&gt;.  Their wealth, after all, results from the creative efforts of all of those below them; their continued prosperity depends upon the continued productivity of those below them.  

&lt;strong&gt;People are more productive when their hard work provides them with increased security and new opportuities.&lt;/strong&gt;  That&#039;s a republican line, right?  The difference seems to be that when the &lt;em&gt;republicans&lt;/em&gt; say it, they&#039;re always talking about the upper end of the economic spectrum.  Their thinking seems to be that wealth is created at the top and spills down to the rest of us.  That&#039;s a fallacy, and one of the reasons for the economic ills besetting our nation.  The people who &lt;em&gt;produce&lt;/em&gt; the wealth are no longer reaping a fair portion of the rewards.   If giving more wealth to the already-wealthy was the road to a healthy economy, our economy would be very healthy indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America may be conservative-leaning, but far-right  Christian republicans aren&#8217;t my idea of &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  My brand of conservativism is based on the Constitution, not the bible.  My brand of conservativism suggests Christian fundamentalists are free to <em>practice</em> their religion, not <em>impose</em> their own biblical interpretations on the rest of us.  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen a republican <em>fiscal</em> conservative since the 1950s.  True fiscal conservativism is based on a few simple, self-evident rules, founded in common sense.  One of the most basic is that you can&#8217;t spend more than you bring in.  </p>
<p>I approve of Obama&#8217;s reassertion of basic democratic social values.  What a lot of people don&#8217;t seem to recognize is that fiscal common sense is part of the same message.  <strong>Obama points out that if we want public works and social programs for the betterment of the nation and for the common good, we&#8217;ve got to <em>pay</em> for them.</strong>  He suggests that those who have benefitted the most from our economic system should be willing to bear a larger portion of that cost.  </p>
<p><strong>This is not radical thinking.</strong>  This is straight talk, simple justice, and economic common sense.  In a society where the richest 10% own over 71% of the total wealth of the nation while the poorest 60% own less than 4%, the richest can <em>afford</em> to pay more, <em>and have a moral obligation to do so</em>.  Their wealth, after all, results from the creative efforts of all of those below them; their continued prosperity depends upon the continued productivity of those below them.  </p>
<p><strong>People are more productive when their hard work provides them with increased security and new opportuities.</strong>  That&#8217;s a republican line, right?  The difference seems to be that when the <em>republicans</em> say it, they&#8217;re always talking about the upper end of the economic spectrum.  Their thinking seems to be that wealth is created at the top and spills down to the rest of us.  That&#8217;s a fallacy, and one of the reasons for the economic ills besetting our nation.  The people who <em>produce</em> the wealth are no longer reaping a fair portion of the rewards.   If giving more wealth to the already-wealthy was the road to a healthy economy, our economy would be very healthy indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karma</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698087</link>
		<dc:creator>Karma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698087</guid>
		<description>No Obama is confused and on the attack against Palin.  I haven&#039;t heard anything from Biden attacking Palin.  

Even the articles with important business leaders represent Obama&#039;s target.

http://businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080908171808.aspx

&quot;The Rogers Holdings CEO had little confidence that Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama, Ill., or Republican vice-presidential nominee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, would be able to do anything to steer Fannie or Freddie on a more stable path.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Obama is confused and on the attack against Palin.  I haven&#8217;t heard anything from Biden attacking Palin.  </p>
<p>Even the articles with important business leaders represent Obama&#8217;s target.</p>
<p><a href="http://businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080908171808.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20080908171808.aspx</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The Rogers Holdings CEO had little confidence that Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama, Ill., or Republican vice-presidential nominee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, would be able to do anything to steer Fannie or Freddie on a more stable path.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-698010</guid>
		<description>Rotflmao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rotflmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank48188</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697868</link>
		<dc:creator>hank48188</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697868</guid>
		<description>This would be like a MAN wearing false eyelashes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be like a MAN wearing false eyelashes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mimi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697860</link>
		<dc:creator>mimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697860</guid>
		<description>You know, we all joke about him being a Manchurian Candidate, but if you&#039;re familiar with that movie (the original), that character didn&#039;t have any friends either, had a love/hate relationship with his mother and no father, only a step-father whom he could not stand.

Just sayin....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, we all joke about him being a Manchurian Candidate, but if you&#8217;re familiar with that movie (the original), that character didn&#8217;t have any friends either, had a love/hate relationship with his mother and no father, only a step-father whom he could not stand.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misstickly</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697780</link>
		<dc:creator>misstickly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697780</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s his schtick. He never breaks character, he always argues the WRONG SIDE of politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s his schtick. He never breaks character, he always argues the WRONG SIDE of politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karma</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697777</link>
		<dc:creator>Karma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697777</guid>
		<description>Why do you Obama supporters have a probelm understanding the right to vote is more important than supporting a lying candidate with a &#039;D&#039; after his name?

I don&#039;t believe Obama on ANY topic he speaks about because he changes them depending upon the audience.  His record shows what a political coward he is.  While you don&#039;t care who helped buy his house.  To me it is a glaring example of how weak he is as a man and a candidate.  He couldn&#039;t even buy his own children a house without the money men.  But you expect him to work for you!?  LOL  

Finally, what would be the benefit of voting for a man who has already subverted my vote TWICE this election?

While stealing MI and FL votes....he lessen the impact my vote had in the primary. 

When he manipulated the roll call....he flat out stole my vote at the convention since CA went for Hillary.


No thanks...keep the bum!  

I&#039;ll keep my vote valid this time and give it to McCain.  

Even without the voter fraud.  I wouldn&#039;t subject this man on any other community.  His district in Chicago is a disgusting example of his version of change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you Obama supporters have a probelm understanding the right to vote is more important than supporting a lying candidate with a &#8216;D&#8217; after his name?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe Obama on ANY topic he speaks about because he changes them depending upon the audience.  His record shows what a political coward he is.  While you don&#8217;t care who helped buy his house.  To me it is a glaring example of how weak he is as a man and a candidate.  He couldn&#8217;t even buy his own children a house without the money men.  But you expect him to work for you!?  LOL  </p>
<p>Finally, what would be the benefit of voting for a man who has already subverted my vote TWICE this election?</p>
<p>While stealing MI and FL votes&#8230;.he lessen the impact my vote had in the primary. </p>
<p>When he manipulated the roll call&#8230;.he flat out stole my vote at the convention since CA went for Hillary.</p>
<p>No thanks&#8230;keep the bum!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep my vote valid this time and give it to McCain.  </p>
<p>Even without the voter fraud.  I wouldn&#8217;t subject this man on any other community.  His district in Chicago is a disgusting example of his version of change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697697</guid>
		<description>When Fox seems to be the &quot;least Biased&quot; we have entered into the twilight zone for sure.

I hate bill O&#039;Reilly and Hannity and Colmes, and don&#039;t get me stated on Neil Cavuto.

Yet every other &quot;news outlet&quot; has abandoned journalistic integrity in the extreem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Fox seems to be the &#8220;least Biased&#8221; we have entered into the twilight zone for sure.</p>
<p>I hate bill O&#8217;Reilly and Hannity and Colmes, and don&#8217;t get me stated on Neil Cavuto.</p>
<p>Yet every other &#8220;news outlet&#8221; has abandoned journalistic integrity in the extreem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian_C82</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697685</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian_C82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697685</guid>
		<description>I think Obama is in way over his head. He&#039;s too far out of touch with regular white and working class Americans to craft a winning electoral strategy. The youth vote has always been a mirage, and increased black voter participation is usually counteracted by increased white turnout. If you want to win the presidency, you have to win the votes of those bitter white people who come to the polls in droves. There is no way around it.

Obama foolishly believes that Americans long for a return to the Great Society programs of the 1960&#039;s, which couldn&#039;t be further from the truth. America is still a conservative leaning country. This is still essentially the same country that voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. The idea that a radical shift has occured and everyone is ready to vote for &quot;change&quot; is simply ludicrous. The Obamabots are in for a rude awakening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama is in way over his head. He&#8217;s too far out of touch with regular white and working class Americans to craft a winning electoral strategy. The youth vote has always been a mirage, and increased black voter participation is usually counteracted by increased white turnout. If you want to win the presidency, you have to win the votes of those bitter white people who come to the polls in droves. There is no way around it.</p>
<p>Obama foolishly believes that Americans long for a return to the Great Society programs of the 1960&#8242;s, which couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth. America is still a conservative leaning country. This is still essentially the same country that voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004. The idea that a radical shift has occured and everyone is ready to vote for &#8220;change&#8221; is simply ludicrous. The Obamabots are in for a rude awakening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4678/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697640</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/08/the-lefties-need-a-panic-room-or-maybe-a-padded-room/#comment-697640</guid>
		<description>I like your comment but please don&#039;t lump the Clintons in with Carter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your comment but please don&#8217;t lump the Clintons in with Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

