<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain/Palin&#8217;s New Ad: &#8220;Lipstick&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Unity at the Dem Convention &#38; Rethinking the Nominee</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-713478</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Unity at the Dem Convention &#38; Rethinking the Nominee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-713478</guid>
		<description>[...] starting offering mouth-to-mouth resuscitation to the ailing Obama campaign. Obviously Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] starting offering mouth-to-mouth resuscitation to the ailing Obama campaign. Obviously Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707898</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707898</guid>
		<description>As opposed to dumbfuck men like Obama who played the victim time and time again during this entire year, right? Take your selective outrage and leave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As opposed to dumbfuck men like Obama who played the victim time and time again during this entire year, right? Take your selective outrage and leave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707817</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707817</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you have a job? How can you spend so much time on this blog?  What makes you think we are not concerned about issues?  Just because we will not vote for Obama? Maybe you should be the one to get over that McCain might just make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you have a job? How can you spend so much time on this blog?  What makes you think we are not concerned about issues?  Just because we will not vote for Obama? Maybe you should be the one to get over that McCain might just make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now)</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707730</link>
		<dc:creator>karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707730</guid>
		<description>This is a troll putting this up here to get us to fall for it.  it is a fake.

he used bemused&#039;s name partly and said texas darlin so it is a troll plant.

ignore this video, there is enough real stuff on ob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a troll putting this up here to get us to fall for it.  it is a fake.</p>
<p>he used bemused&#8217;s name partly and said texas darlin so it is a troll plant.</p>
<p>ignore this video, there is enough real stuff on ob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoBamaNoWay</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707619</link>
		<dc:creator>NoBamaNoWay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707619</guid>
		<description>they&#039;re all a bunch of pimply-faced teenage punks, so it&#039;s expected.  kids can be cruel, you know.  too bad for them, us old folks vote more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re all a bunch of pimply-faced teenage punks, so it&#8217;s expected.  kids can be cruel, you know.  too bad for them, us old folks vote more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707454</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707454</guid>
		<description>Honcho, Honey!
  All that &quot;Hurt&quot; you&#039;re feeling...It&#039;s your asshole talking...
  It&#039;s saying..&quot;Lay off the Unity Dildo for awhile!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honcho, Honey!<br />
  All that &#8220;Hurt&#8221; you&#8217;re feeling&#8230;It&#8217;s your asshole talking&#8230;<br />
  It&#8217;s saying..&#8221;Lay off the Unity Dildo for awhile!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707445</guid>
		<description>And the comment above mine from Deborah is a prime example of what is wrong with this country, and it comes from both sides of the isle.  People like her would rather hurl insults and degrade another person than act like an actual human being with a shred of common sense and decency.  There is no excuse for that kind of behavior from either party, or their supporters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the comment above mine from Deborah is a prime example of what is wrong with this country, and it comes from both sides of the isle.  People like her would rather hurl insults and degrade another person than act like an actual human being with a shred of common sense and decency.  There is no excuse for that kind of behavior from either party, or their supporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707418</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707418</guid>
		<description>While I am not one to defend politicians, as they all tend to say and do stupid things, (God knows Obama has said more than his fair share over the course of this campaign), I see no merit in this particular claim of sexism.  But, before I go on, I should also note that I am more of a Libertarian than anything else, so I don&#039;t really care for either candidate.

This wasn&#039;t the first time Obama used that phrase.  It just happened to be the first time he used it after Palin&#039;s lipstick joke.  When taken in context of all Obama said, he was referring to the Republican ticket and party in general, not any one person in particular.  

For McCain to make a big deal out of this is a bit hypocritical when you think about it, considering he himself used the exact same phrase when referring to Hillary Clinton and her platform.  Does that make him sexist as well?  He doesn&#039;t seem to think so because he was referring to her take on things rather than her as person.  I didn&#039;t hold that against him at the time and he should not be holding this against Obama, because nothing personally negative was meant by it.

I am not going to try and change anyones opinion of what was said, because you are going to believe what you want to believe and most of you seem to hate Obama so much that anything that can be twisted to sound sexist will be despite the facts.

Here is something I found to be sexist even though it wasn&#039;t reported on, and it came from the Republican National Convention of all places.  There were delegates on the floor wearing Palin campaign buttons saying things such as &quot;I am voting for the hot chick&quot;, or &quot;Hoosiers for the hot chick&quot;, or &quot;hot chick, cool ticket&quot;  Nice of the Republicans to reduce their VP nominee to a piece of meat that looks good in a dress.

To be fair, neither one of the candidates is going to do anything they say they will.  Neither one will change anything with the exception of adding to the National debt with their economic plans.

I can only hope that one day an election might actually be about the issues that people face rather than one candidate crying that the other is picking on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am not one to defend politicians, as they all tend to say and do stupid things, (God knows Obama has said more than his fair share over the course of this campaign), I see no merit in this particular claim of sexism.  But, before I go on, I should also note that I am more of a Libertarian than anything else, so I don&#8217;t really care for either candidate.</p>
<p>This wasn&#8217;t the first time Obama used that phrase.  It just happened to be the first time he used it after Palin&#8217;s lipstick joke.  When taken in context of all Obama said, he was referring to the Republican ticket and party in general, not any one person in particular.  </p>
<p>For McCain to make a big deal out of this is a bit hypocritical when you think about it, considering he himself used the exact same phrase when referring to Hillary Clinton and her platform.  Does that make him sexist as well?  He doesn&#8217;t seem to think so because he was referring to her take on things rather than her as person.  I didn&#8217;t hold that against him at the time and he should not be holding this against Obama, because nothing personally negative was meant by it.</p>
<p>I am not going to try and change anyones opinion of what was said, because you are going to believe what you want to believe and most of you seem to hate Obama so much that anything that can be twisted to sound sexist will be despite the facts.</p>
<p>Here is something I found to be sexist even though it wasn&#8217;t reported on, and it came from the Republican National Convention of all places.  There were delegates on the floor wearing Palin campaign buttons saying things such as &#8220;I am voting for the hot chick&#8221;, or &#8220;Hoosiers for the hot chick&#8221;, or &#8220;hot chick, cool ticket&#8221;  Nice of the Republicans to reduce their VP nominee to a piece of meat that looks good in a dress.</p>
<p>To be fair, neither one of the candidates is going to do anything they say they will.  Neither one will change anything with the exception of adding to the National debt with their economic plans.</p>
<p>I can only hope that one day an election might actually be about the issues that people face rather than one candidate crying that the other is picking on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah C</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707407</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707407</guid>
		<description>Lipstick on a pig is a saying according to an entry in 2004 in the &quot;Urban dictionary&quot; http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lipstick%20on%20a%20pig

The definition of the phrase is: &quot;lipstick on a pig&quot;...slang for when someone tries to dress something up, but is still that something. &lt;strong&gt;usually used on ugly broads&lt;/strong&gt;, when they put on a skirt and some lipstick and well, they still look like the same digusting pig. &quot;

So not only is she a pig, she&#039;s ugly to boot.  Sort of like Hillary&#039;s ankles I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lipstick on a pig is a saying according to an entry in 2004 in the &#8220;Urban dictionary&#8221; <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lipstick%20on%20a%20pig" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=lipstick%20on%20a%20pig</a></p>
<p>The definition of the phrase is: &#8220;lipstick on a pig&#8221;&#8230;slang for when someone tries to dress something up, but is still that something. <strong>usually used on ugly broads</strong>, when they put on a skirt and some lipstick and well, they still look like the same digusting pig. &#8221;</p>
<p>So not only is she a pig, she&#8217;s ugly to boot.  Sort of like Hillary&#8217;s ankles I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd McBerfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd McBerfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707289</guid>
		<description>As a follow up, you can slice cattle flop as thin as you like--hell, use a microtome, if need be. In the end it is still nothing more than thinly-sliced bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow up, you can slice cattle flop as thin as you like&#8211;hell, use a microtome, if need be. In the end it is still nothing more than thinly-sliced bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrawberrybitesBarky</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707270</link>
		<dc:creator>StrawberrybitesBarky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707270</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re whining again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re whining again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seasiren</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707259</link>
		<dc:creator>seasiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707259</guid>
		<description>It is only nonsense when people are too ignorant to face the truth. I am not voting for Obama and I will never vote for McCain. 

When someone has nothing intelligent to say, you call them names. Talk about a disorder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is only nonsense when people are too ignorant to face the truth. I am not voting for Obama and I will never vote for McCain. </p>
<p>When someone has nothing intelligent to say, you call them names. Talk about a disorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrawberrybitesBarky</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707241</link>
		<dc:creator>StrawberrybitesBarky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707241</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Hockey mom.  Get your facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Hockey mom.  Get your facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seasiren</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707237</link>
		<dc:creator>seasiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707237</guid>
		<description>Oh you mean all the hate towards Obama? The facts are too painful. I agree lets stop the hate of Obama. How about some issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh you mean all the hate towards Obama? The facts are too painful. I agree lets stop the hate of Obama. How about some issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferd McBerfle</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4710/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferd McBerfle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/10/mccainpalins-new-ad-lipstick/#comment-707229</guid>
		<description>Oblahblah most certainly did give her the finger--not once, but twice at two different venues at the same point in his prefabricated hogwash blather. Your take on it may be different but that&#039;s only your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oblahblah most certainly did give her the finger&#8211;not once, but twice at two different venues at the same point in his prefabricated hogwash blather. Your take on it may be different but that&#8217;s only your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

