RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Buyer’s Remorse

Everywhere you look today there is second guessing about the choice of Obama as the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate. The Kool-Aid must be running low as even the party’s VP candidate is quoted, from yesterday, suggesting he’s the wrong person on the ticket“

“Make no mistake about it Hillary Clinton is as qualified as or more qualified than I am. And quite frankly, she may have been a better pick than me.”—Joe Biden.

It’s not just Biden, the media, even as they apologize and attempt to explain away Obama’s latest crude comment against Governor Palin, is starting to ask how they got stuck with Obama.

The Obama nutroots gangs are truly beginning to freak out.

“In the opening days of the general election campaign, an exaggerated optimism has swept through Republican ranks and an equally exaggerated gloom has infected the Democrats.”—David Broder.


“It has come to our attention that a large number of Democrats have gone completely nuts about Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. He’s going to lose! Sarah Palin is getting all the attention! The Republicans are so mean! Why isn’t he tougher?”—Gail Collins. As with Broder, Collins tries to reassure Obama supporters that all is not already lost.

Maureen Dowd, who has one of the sharpest tongues and wit among her writing peers, wrote Tuesday an unusually sober piece that noted McCain’s success in “devilishly mocking Obama — and successfully getting into his head — with ads about how he was just a frothy celebrity, like Paris Hilton and Britney Spears”.

Kathleen Parker explains best in an absolutely must-read commentary (see Feminist template obliterated in USA Today), where she writes about Governor Palin: “She’s what some might call ‘Trouble.’ And proud of it, too.”

Reactions from all sides have fallen somewhere in the realm of hysteria. Republicans, 85% of whom view Palin favorably, are delirious that they — the maligned party of traditional family values — have produced the most credible, kick-caribou female candidate in U.S. history.

Democrats, only 24% of whom view Palin favorably, are dumbfounded — sort of the way Republicans were when a new guy named Obama edged out a stable of Democratic veterans for the presidential nomination.

Who is this woman who could be only a heartbeat away from the presidency? Where did she come from? How could John McCain do such a thing?

Talk about the audacity of hope.

Parker notes “McCain can hardly wipe the grin off his face. He gambled and won — Big Time.”

As to the question of “What kind of woman do we want in high office? What kind of woman is acceptable? ” Parker writes that “Feminists have always called the shots on this question” but through McCain “the greatest insult was yet to come.”

Republicans — those anti-woman, patriarchal Neanderthalian gun-clingers — nominated a woman whom Democrats would call a “Stepford wife,” except she’d beat them to a bloody pulp with a moose antler.

Aside from the irony, Parker concludes with satisfaction,

“Even if Sarah Palin ultimately fails to prove herself worthy of second-in-command, her enthusiastic reception has proved that there are other kinds of women in the USA — lots of them — who have a different idea about what’s best for womankind.”

No wonder Obama is running scared. His 15 minutes is up. He is buried in his own sexism, partnered with a missing VP candidate that says Clinton was a better choice, and surrounded by followers that are hate-filled and vile in their attacks on his opponents.

Yes, McCain has good reason to have a grin on his face.

  • Skiron

    “…even as they apologize and attempt to explain away Obama’s latest crude comment against Governor Palin,”

    Tool. The pig comment WASN’T DIRECTED at Palin. How many times do I have to say it?

    • http://chriss chris

      Say it as much as you want to. You’re still wrong– but have fun with it.

      • LilRod

        perception is what counts..and his audience took it as being directed to Gov Palin…and many many others who have watched the replay….AND THAT IS THE WAY THE COOKIE CRUMBLES

        • jwrjr

          Even if Obama didn’t mean it personally, that’s the way it was perceived. Which means that Obama has a much bigger problem (if he is to be POTUS). It is called ‘opening mouth before engaging brain’.

          • janetintexas

            Goodness gracious sakes alive — of course it was deliberate and personal. My first reaction when I heard it was: “what is he, 12?” As a woman with 2 brothers, a wife, and the mom of two sons, I know what adolescent boys like to do, and at the Obot playground I’m sure the insult was as hilarious as a fart joke.

        • AliasJohnDoe

          The “audience” told the truth of the pig statement! Obama meant it for Palin.

    • JayD

      It does not matter how often you or anyone else says that Obama was not talking about Palin regarding his piggish comments. The perception is that he directed it at her because that’s the type of person Obama is. We all know this about him since he’s done it before. Perception is a killer and nothing he, you, or anyone else says will change that.

      • StrawberrybitesBarky

        Yup, and if he’s too much of an amateur to undestand perception then he’s too much of an amateur to go head to head with the likes of Putin, Iran and North Korea.

      • wonderwoman

        If it was a mistake why wouldn’t he apologize.

        • JoseyJ

          Bingo!
          but because Obama NEVER apologizes it only reflects his other elitist characteristics.

          NObama!

      • ldyoung

        I agree. I suppose that Oblahblah didn’t give Hillary the finger on national TV either — or didn’t really utter the words, “You’re likeable enough” during a debate — and on and on and on. Oblahblah never seems to be responsible for anything he does or says. This is why he will never be President!

        • AliasJohnDoe

          He never apologized for brushing Hillary off his shoulders either. The audience reaction told the truth there too.

          Obama is above apologies. “The One” can do no wrong.

        • SteveS

          No, no – it wasn’t his fault; it was his staff. It’s all their fault, not his. Can’t you understand that? It was his staff.

      • ziggy

        It isn’t my perception. It isn’t the perception of the majority of commentators. The perception is that it’s a transparent republican ploy.

        I strongly support transparent republican ploys, and the more media exposure they get the better. Pretty soon people will begin to become be suspicious of everything they say.

        And rightly so.

        So please: Give us more! It will only diminish the already fading effects of the Reverend Wright crapola, the Bill Ayers crapola, the Rezko crapola, and whatever other little treasure you’ve got hidden away for that last-minute sh-t storm. By the time you roll it out, the smell will be sticking to the republican campaign, not to Barack Obama.

        Barack Obama is going to talk policy. And how McCain’s is the same as Bush’s. McCain can stand there with a blank look on his face while people watch his attack ads and wrinkle their noses.

        • ziggy

          btw… Hold onto your hats. We’re about to lose about 60 days of Gulf coast oil and gas production to another hurricane. I read that as a pre-election price spike. It’s unclear what the political consequences will be, but there will be political consequences.

          • StrawberrybitesBarky

            Well, you’d better rush out right now and check your tire pressure. Quick!

        • Faulkner

          I’m sorry to inform you but making McCain Bush III is not going to work. As well as saying that community organiser obama is will work across party lines for change. When you vote 98% of the time along party lines versus McCains 80% +/-, then you relinquish the unifer title.

    • Capt Howdy

      fine. for the sake of argument, lets say it wasnt.
      you know what. it doesnt matter.
      in politics perception is reality.

      • BettsAZ

        As the author Frank Luntz titled his book:

        “It’s Not What You Say,It’s What People Hear”

    • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

      Yes, it was.

      Anyway, believe whatever you want. I’d suggest giving a read to Daniel Finkelstein at the Times today who writes in “What Sarah Palin tells us about Obama“:

      Here are a few thoughts of my own on the lipstick on a pig moment (see this earlier post for the views of others).

      First, demonstrating that McCain had used the same phrase before doesn’t cut it.

      The reason the pig idea popped into Barack Obama’s mouth is that Palin had used the pitbull and lipstick joke in her speech. Can anyone doubt that?

      So Obama was using it as a jibe against her. This was monumentally foolish. And this raises questions about Obama’s character.

      Second, the character question it raises is not that he is a sexist or that he lacks courtesy. It is that he folds under pressure.

      Obama has looked amazingly uncomfortable under the pressure that Palin has put him under. He relies on his cool – it is a core part of his appeal. So he looks bad when he loses it. During the Hillary contest he rarely came under any pressure from the media. When he did he reacted badly.

      So the problem caused by Palin isn’t really about Palin – it’s about Obama.

      Which brings me to the third point. Obama cannot change how Palin is seen anywhere near as much as he thinks he can. He needs to work on how he is seen.

      But, as Jay Cost argues, he hasn’t been disciplined enough to do this.

      • SJ

        Obama is under pressure with Palin and I am yet to see what kind of attack Palin has launched against Obama, all she has done is throw her hat in the race but he does seem totally off his game.

        How can this man fit the bill of President here we have one woman a unknown entering the race, not firing a shot at Obama, he has not debated her and will not, but yet he is all out of sync, am amazed when people ask if some are not worried that Palin is a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

        Am not but those who support Obama better be worried because he sure seems as if he cant handle pressure not even from a woman, so how will be handle a crisis, or a world leader that is hostile against him, Obama sure is not acting as if he is capable of leading anything or anyone anywhere.

        • http://chriss chris

          What if “mister unglued” has a hissy fit with a foreign leader? Will he be hell bent on revenge no matter the cost to our country? Will he be so obsessed that he can’t look at any other problems? One would hope this is a remote possibility, but who wants to take that chance? He is just too raw and inexperienced to stand up to the pressure of the Presidency. There are too many ways he can make a disastrous mistake. That then raises the possibility that those behind the throne will be running the show and that is even scarier due to the fact his associates are of the less than desirable variety. We need to see he doesn’t get the chance ever to be in that position.

          • Skiron

            Your description is much better suited to McCain. There are too many ways for HIM to make a mistake. HE is the one with the infamous, unpredictable temper. HE is the one who’s handlers (the neocons) will be running the show from behind the scene. His associates are the same ones who got us embroiled in Iraq, and will do the same number on Iran if he’s elected.

            And Obama doesn’t have hissy fits. “No drama” is how he comports himself and how he wanted his campaign to be run. He’s cool as a cucumber.

            • http://chriss chris

              No Drama? He’s the drama queen. Did you watch his interview with o’Reilly? He couldn’t sit still, touching, squirming, heh heh hehing. Oh and what about his ‘the waters will recede/rise” or whatever he meant, etc. etc. The Greek temple thing– drama unleashed. Please. McCain is so much more Presidential it isn’t even comparable. Not to mention the elephant in the room: experience. Can’t fill up a paragraph about BoBo Obama’s experience for the job.

            • richasis

              yeah, and its shows…

            • Andrew

              And green as a pickle.

          • BettsAZ

            Obama will just roll over and happily concede to our enemies.
            I say happily because unfortunately I believe that Obama has,ideologically speaking, more in common with our enemies than he does with the American people. They both hate America.

        • voterinexile

          And yet no one mentions that Biden a 65 y.o. with 2 past brain aneuryisms is a heartbeat away from the presidency -

          IMHO – McCain’s longevity genes (take a gander at his 97 y.o. mother!) beats Obama’s – both parents deceased in mid-life – trumps Obama and Biden.

          • http://chriss chris

            That is something that has bothered me too. This guy seems to have a problem with alcohol, has a dubious health record, puts his foot in his mouth on a regular basis, is almost as old as JMc. and yet he’s a better choice for VP-a-heart-beat-away than Palin? Riiiiight.

          • Mirlo

            that would put Nancy Pelosi where exactly????

            Think about it!

            • AliasJohnDoe

              Pelosi had this worked out years ago.

      • JP

        I think it was Sen. Clinton who was trying to say Sen. Obama was not vetted… Say wadda now? NO. Say it ain’t so. But, but, but he is a MEDIA DAHHHHRLING! That must count for something. No?

        Maybe.

        We’ll see.

        • http://deleted Buzz Latte

          The Berg vs Obama, Soetoro, DNC, FEC lawsuit is starting the vetting process that should have been done two years ago.

          Reid, Pelosi, Brazile, and Dean should be tarred and feathered.

          • richasis

            Yup, and put brazile at the top of that ‘heap’, if for no other reason than having to see her lame self on the MSM throughout the primaries.

      • Enough o’Bama

        Second, the character question it raises is not that he is a sexist or that he lacks courtesy. It is that he folds under pressure.

        Obama’s voting history, a record of accomodation, self-interest and endless rationalization is proof of that. Look at the Nuke-plant Leak notification bill. After Obama was done giving his cronies at Exelon everything they wanted, it was no more than a suggestion that affected citizens be notified by the operators of leaking nuke plants. Same old same old. Attach a grandiose title to a crappy, screw-the-taxpayer bill.

        I mean, really, just how far up *there* do you have to have your head inserted before you actually believe Saint Obama’s bullsh*t?

      • katie kay

        matt weaver — Obama is jealous of Palin because in 45 minutes we know Sarah Palin. She is real and she is one of us in a way that Obama never could be. With her wide open eyes and her face looking straight at us we see a person we can relate to. She doesn’t put her nose in the air when speaking to us. Yesterday she was making a speech at the airport in Anchorage and she was talking to the people about Alaska. Suddenly she said — I’m preaching to the choir, you guys already know all this. That was a moment of truth I will never see from Barack Hussein Obama.

    • Kevin

      and the finger wasn’t directed at Sen. Clinton, and the song at the Iowa celebration was just a snappy little number, good beat and easy to dance to.

      WORM

      enjoy the next couple of months troll
      :) -~

      • richasis

        that’s to say nothing of Ludacris’ song wherein Hillary is a ‘bitch’, McCain should be paralyzed, and the Whitehouse should be painted black…

        BarkO: “I know and respect Jay-Z and Ludacris. They have talent and are wonderful businessmen.”

        This was in Rolling Stone Magazine – by the same scum BarkO supporter that published the hit-piece on Sarah in his other ‘rag-mag’, Us magazine.

    • Docelder

      Watch the video… watch it close… he pauses… stops… deep down he knows better… but his hatred runs so deep… he has to say it. Then he refuses to even apologize that the remark could have been interpreted as offensive. Instead he says if he had really meant it that way… Palin would have been the lipstick… Unbelievable. And he didn’t dust Hillary off his shoulders… and he didn’t give her “the finger” twice in separate speeches. It’s just a chronic itchy cheek thing. He has proven himself more akin to being qualified as a “rap star” than as being qualified for President. What a waste of a perfectly good Harvard law degree.

      • Skiron

        And the dusting-the-shoulders off thing was just SO offensive, I guess. The oversensitivity among the Hillary supporters here is just unreal. Why don’t you take Hillary’s advice, if you can’t take the heat, if you can’t stomach the most minor of offenses like these (and now this phantom pig insult), then get your ass out of the kitchen. Politics ain’t for crybabies.

        • Skiron

          there should be quotes around “offenses” in the comment above, because IMO the ones you cite are not offenses at all.

        • Kevin

          Then wtf you crying about?

          And yes i find the choice of vulgar Rap “music” by a presidential candidate at a victory celebration to be offensive.

          But I guess that would bring on the

          dreaded
          race card
          oooohhhh

        • McHope

          Skiron,
          Whether you are personally offended or not,
          don’t you expect a higher standard of behavior from your president?

          Giving the finger, brushing off another person implying they are dirt, slapping his wife on the backside in front of the nation, her (Michelle’s) reference to babby daddy, rap music, playing offensively meant music after Pres Clinton spoke at the DNC, the pig lipstick thing, constant plagarizing, refusing to shake hands,that condescending smirk he uses, brooding at opponents, insulting actual voters in rural areas of this nation and so on…. these are classless acts of egotism and defiance. Would your own boss act so unprofessionally? If you behaved this way at work, would you still have a job?

          • voterinexile

            Lip locking Jill Biden on convention stage!

            He always ‘claims’ innocence whether for actual words or gestures – knowing full well that the context establishes the MEANING…

            But only for the Obama-defined OUT group – the IN group can wrap themselves in talking points, denials – and outright lies.

            • McHope

              Right, his campaign gets credit for being master marketers but then we are to believe he does not know the impact of what he says and does.

          • roseeriter

            Like starting with HONESTY?? Obama is the most dishonest human being I’ve ever witnessed running for POTUS and That’s REALLY DISHONEST!!

        • helen

          Does koolaid kill brain cells?

          COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY ALWAYS

          PUMAS,BUBBAS,AND THOSE PEOPLE RULE

        • MsSoAnd So

          Nobama is the biggest crybaby of all! You need to step back and take another look at your candidate – an objective look. I know it’s hard to face truth and admit you were wrong. Take comfort in knowing that you wisened up before it’s too late. MCCain/Palin 2008

      • http://democrats-against-obama.org cassie23

        Docelder

        You watch him purposely decide to put this into his speech…because he paused. For those who say he just didn’t think first…you actually see him thinking. He knew what he was doing and couldn’t help himself because he is like a man-child. He is like a 5th grader, still pretending to scratch his cheek when giving the finger. I suppose his cheek just happens to itch when he says Hillary’s name or is talking about her. The man has a problem with women…maybe all women, but especially white women. Maybe it has something to do with his mother… In any case, it’s scary to think of such a reactionary type bully as being POTUS.

    • JP

      one more time…

      pretty puhleeze…

      and then again

      and again

      keep repeating till Nov. 5

      “lipstick”

    • Mike J.

      During the convention Palin implicitly describes herself as “pit bull with lipstick”. Then Obama gets out his “putting lipstick on a pig” line.

      The obvious implication is that Obama is saying she’s not a pit bull but a pig. If he doesn’t know that, what business does he have running for President? And, say, isn’t he the one that kept insisting that “words matter”?

      • http://www.noquarterusa.net Linda

        I would say if Obama has the need to refer to a woman as a pig, [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR FOR INAPPROPRIATE REFERENCE]

        • Skiron

          You stay classy, Linda.

          • beebop

            Oh. Is that what Linda meant? I am sure that it was just one of those sayings out there you can google and find …. people use it all the time … take my wife …

            • http://deleted Buzz Latte

              Does anyone have a pic of lipstick on a gargoyle?

              • Kevin

                mrs. shreck?
                not a gargoyle, and ogre
                but close

          • http://deleted Buzz Latte

            Be sure to email your loser candidate Obama will that advise, Windbag.

    • Mamatx

      So funny to hear THE ONE cry foul–that he didn’t mean what those evil Rovians are saying when he himself has spent months saying that McCain wanted to keep up the war in Iraq for 100 years.

      But we “stupid white trash” people aren’t supposed to be able to understand irony and hypocrisy.

      • Tuppence 411

        What Sarah Palin tells us about Obama- Oblah blah is insecure with his leadership abilities and insecure of relationships with women he can’t have sex with. Barky is easily rattled and easily manipulated because of the deadly combination of having an inflated sense of ego along with being thin skinned.

        What Sarah Palin tells us about McCain- John McCain is sure of himself and his decisions. He is not afraid of working as a team with a strong, opinionated woman. His ego is secure enough to allow a woman to take the spotlight. He understand that makes him a stronger man.

        John McCain is a man. Barky Nobama is an adolescent boy.

        • AliasJohnDoe

          “His ego is secure enough to allow a woman to take the spotlight. He understands that makes him a stronger man.”

          I agree with this. I see McCain in a different light. And he is a stronger man because of it. It shows.

    • Callendar

      You might want to reconsider, there. The alternative to “he didn’t know” is “he was too stupid to realize how his words would sound.”

      Neither speaks well of your hero.

    • Heather

      Exhibit A:

      A man who flips Hillary off in a speech, who brushes dirt off his shoulder while referring to Hillary, and who plays “99 Problems and a B**** Ain’t One” to celebrate a campaign victory …

      Exhibit B:

      Palin’s “lipstick on a pitbull” comment was one of the most-discussed and most-replayed of Palin’s convention speech.

      Exhibit C:

      A smart savvy campaigner with ‘good judgement’ who believes fervently in the importance of “words? JUST words?”

    • DanO

      We’re sorry, we forgot that YOU are the only one who decides what everyone in the world meant.

      Our bad. We won’t do it again. Sorry.

    • Liz B

      If you’re man, Obama, didn’t mean it like that, then he is a victim of circumstance of his own making. Of all the millions of words and catch phrases, in all the speeches given, he coincidently comes up with this analogy, that McCain has used for a long time (years), and we are supposed to buy that there was no intention to draw a visual connection to Sarah Palin when he said it? Then your guy ain’t too bright, and for all of those folks in Democratic la-la land, who expected Joe Biden to put his foot in his mouth on the campaign trail, guess what! Obama has been making so many gaffes on the trail, that the 527′s have no need to use any of their backup bombs, cuz Barack gives us a new one each day. I think his European/Hawaiian vaycay came at an inopportune time, this guy was so overconfident he basically told us that he needed to take a vacation now because he was sure he was going to be very busy from August until 8 years from now. McCain trudged along, stayed on message, played the underdog, the washed up old guy who had no hope, and no options even for a VP to breathe life into his campaign. I think I admire McCain more, because he let the “Star Obama” burn itself out (like all stars eventually do), and I think Palin was always in the wings, she was probably vetted months ago, and I think all the other names were just a smokescreen thrown up to let Mr. Id do himself in. He cut off his nose to spite his face, and he knows it. The Obama campaign has jumped the shark like we knew it would, the only surprise is just how cool that McCain guy is. He is the stuff of fables…literally. This Campaign will be a template for many elections to come on what to do (on the McCain side) and what not to do (on the Obama side). It seems like poetic justice that the phrase that keeps coming to my mind when I think of Barack is the Bible Proverb “Pride goeth before a fall, a haughty spirit before destruction”. I guess Barack should have gone to a Church where they taught that Jesus based Christianity and he would have at least have had a warning.

      • http://www.noquarterusa.net Linda

        You are right about Palin being vetted before. Her name was mentioned as possible VP back in April. No last minute pick.

      • elizabeth reilly

        LizB, you’re right. McCain started vetting Palin in May.
        The Dems, the party I belonged to for over 30 years, are just about the most inept political party and will probably disappear from the scene within 10 years. People are finally waking up to how their (we) are being manipulated, and to how little our vote really counts.
        There couldn’t be a more opportune time for a third party to rise, and this is why I’m becoming an Independent. If Obama is the best the Dems can do, they don’t deserve a place at the table.

        • Irish1139

          I keep asking myself when have we ever elected a man who had to build a temple so he could speak to 80,000 people just to tell them he was going to accept his party’s nomination for president? Has any candidate ever done anything like that before? $6,000,000 he spent on his temple. We have had 43 presidents, and I don’t think any of them have spent that much or built a temple. I am convinced there is something wrong with Obama. He has severe psychological problems, and I just don’t want to take the chance on him. I would rather have an old man go to Washington with a 44 year old lady and clean the place out.

          What a thrill to watch them throw the garbage out!!!!

          • TheGhost

            Those are the best words I have read all day long.

            Thanks for saying all of that.

            Me too…McCain-Palin will bring us home from the hinterlands of a nightmare called obamaMamaLandia

    • beebop

      Say it over and over and over. Keep it in play. Please. You hurt your guy without any of us saying one freaking word. Just like he does with his own campaign. The 527′s may finish the season with more money than they started it …. hahahahahahahaha

    • Monet

      If we’re going to go into a third day of discussing the lipstick on pigs statement, a statement that was delivered to manipulate the topics discussed in the media and among the public this week, Senator Obama wins the point.

      Have we heard anything more about what the McCain/Palin team is going to do for us other than drill? I’m not sold that drilling is going to do anything, other than short term small relief at the pump, that is if OPEC doesn’t cut their production. I want to hear how we’re going to get nuclear plants built. How are we going to pay for them? Where are they going to be? How long will it take to build them? What are we going to do to ensure their safe? How are we going to care for the waste and where are we going to store it? Once up and running, how will they effect my energy costs?

      I want to hear more about natural gas. How plentiful is it in this country? How much will it harm the environment to tap into it? How long before we run out of it? How much of America can it power? How will it reduce my energy costs?

      I want to know how McCain/Palin plan to get health care to the people who can’t afford a policy for themselves and their family. If you can’t write a check for a policy, you can’t get your tax break for it.

      I want to know what we’re going to do about the border with Mexico. How are we going to stop the drug related crime along the border. How are we going to stop terrorists from crossing our Canadian and Mexican borders? Putting all my toiletries into little bottles in a Baggie doesn’t make me feel safe when I board an airplane. It’s just one more nuisance in a failed policy to protect us.

      What foreign markets are they going to go after to export our products and services so we keep jobs here? What kind of green jobs are going to be created? Realistically, are any going to pay much more than minimum wage? Will they have health benefits? New start up companies can’t afford health care for their employees.

      I’m not going to cast a vote for Senator McCain because Senator Obama uses inflammatory remarks against his competitor. I’m not voting on who uses lipstick nicely and who uses it nastily.

      So, are we going to waste this whole week on lipstick or get back to the issues? If you still want to talk about lipstick, someone mentioned a fantastic idea of mailing lipstick by the truckload to the DNC to express at our outrage at their machinations this year. That’s constructive. Ranting about Senator Obama’s lipstick on pigs comment is destructive to our goals and exactly what he wants. If you’re still ranting about lipstick, change your focus and arrange a campaign to get it by the truck load to DNC headquarters. If their offices spend a week dealing with truck loads of lipstick, that’s one week business as usual is disturbed. Then it’s a point for McCain/Palin.

      • roseeriter

        Then go watch CNN and get lost bothead!

        Obamacrats are worse than the Bushbots back in 2000. Deal with that! HYPOCRIT!!

      • abbie

        If that is true (that the discussions should be about issues) then why was Obama talking about pigs and dead fish int he first place?

        PS – The comments in this thread really rock today. The readers at NQ get it.

        • no vote for Oblabla

          Indeed, that’s great point abbie. Unless pigs and fish are important issues concerning all Americans then why did Obammunist even go there? And why did the audience react with laughter and applause? Maybe it’s because pigs and fish are important national issues for them?

          Poor anchovies, the more they try defending TheMessiah at NQ the more they reveal what goose-stepping brainless lemmings they are.

    • Duras

      It doesn’t matter whether it actually was or not. That’s how it was perceived. The hooting and hollering from those in attendance when he said it sure seemed (to me, at least) to indicate that they interpreted it as being directed at Palin.

    • bmc

      It wasn’t directed at Sarah Palin?!

      Well, that certainly is important to know.

      Thanks for pointing that out, because certainly, if Obama included that in his speech without being aware of it’s impact, then he’s a stupid man, and far too dangerous to be on the world stage where he might say something equally stupid and put our country at risk.

    • tj

      Hey troll,
      What about the dead fish in a newspaper comment. Have any idea what that means? Certain organizations us it as sort of a threat. I suppose you are going to say his meaning of it was not derogatory either. The man needs to own up to his mistakes instead of always making excuses as to why he said what he said. He is already beginning to forget which story he told to who. This is a really bad sign for him. To many lies, to many stories he cant keep then straight. Ya this is the person I want in the White House!

    • looking for integrity

      Skiron

      It was. An article on democrats.org, written on 8/30 carried a headline referring to Palin as a pig with lipstick and a matching photo. Interestingly, the pig also had a pearl necklace on remeniscent of Cindy McCains signature pearls.

      • Zelda Crunch

        Yeah they’re nice people those DEMOCRATS.

        Notice people how the GOP stick to the moral high ground and Obama and his Dems never even approached the moral high ground. You’d think it would have been the other way around with the eight W years and a Dem victory originally regarded as a slam-dunk.

        Shows what a disastrous loser party Howard Dean’s running.

    • red_sleeves

      Are you Obama?

      No?

      Then how the fuck do you know what his intentions were, sockcucker?

      The way he fumble-fucked the line, almost hesitatingly, seems to indicate that he knew how it would be interpreted. If he missed the connection then he’s a fucking dolt because his audience sure got it didn’t they?

      By arguing that Obama is not mean you are making a strong case that he is very fucking stupid. Nice job.

      • TheGhost

        Found on the hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion
        see link below…it oughta explain most of what we have been seeing and not what we thought was to be expected. Actions speak louder than words?
        ===

        http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=28804

        WILLIAM AYERS HAS BEEN THE MASTERMIND BEHIND THE RISE OF BARACK OBAMA

        AYERS HAS DESIGNED AN OBAMA CAMPAIGN STRUCTURE WHICH IS BASED ON AYERS’ THEORIES OF MAOIST REVOLUTION.

        THE CHICAGO VERSION OF “FRIENDS”

        OBAMA LIED TO ABC NEWS AND A NATIONAL TV AUDIENCE

        (NEW YORK, NY)(September 9, 2008)

        Nailing down the relationship between “mad bomber” William Ayers and Barack Obama has been the greatest challenge of the 2008 presidential campaign.

        The second biggest challenge of 2008 has been deciphering and understanding Barack Obama’s campaign structure.

        His campaign is unlike any other presidential campaign in U. S. history.

        Obama’s operation is authoritarian, disciplined and centralized in Chicago.

        Obama’s reliance on a nationwide network of local “offices” and mailing lists points inexorably to a political latticework straight out of William Ayers’ revolutionary playbook.

        The bottom line: After an exhaustive investigation ContrarianCommentary.com can confirm that Barack Obama appears to be William Ayers’ “front” for a national, ongoing Maoist-style revolutionary campaign structure which will endure past November 4th.

        Ironically, as we searched for the Ayers-Obama relationship in the present, it was staring us in the face: Obama’s campaign is structured precisely the way Ayers would want.

        That is why Obama has created “Camp Obamas” across the United States to indoctrinate workers, and adopted other similar Fidel Castro/Hugo Chavez tactics.

        The puzzle pieces are finally starting to fall into place. Last week we asked why would Black Panther party revolutionary Khalid Al-Mansour start soliciting money for Obama’s legal education? The answer: Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, were close associates of the Black Panther Party and even unleashed a terrorist attack on a New York judge who heard a Panther case.

    • Rob in Chicago

      And Hillary’s comment about long primaries and RFK’s asassination was not a threat against Obama, and Bill’s “fairy tale” comment was not racist. This is politics, idiot, and politics ain’t beanball. Twisting a politician’s words into something perceived as an insult or something perceived as funny or embarassing is our national passtime, and it’s what keeps Jon Stewart in business. We like to laugh at our dumbass politicians because it dulls the pain of the knives they are constantly sticking in our ribs and wallets.

      • Zelda Crunch

        Twisting a politician’s words into something perceived as an insult or something perceived as funny or embarassing is our national passtime, and it’s what keeps Jon Stewart in business.

        Eloquent but I don’t think that should be a carte blanche for smearing as it’s been used the past year by Obama, Dean, Brazile, et cie.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Yes, it was–as was the FISH comment. It was Obama’s childish way of telling his supporters that he thinks Palin is a skank with a nasty-smelling hoo-hah.

      It’s the sort of thing that men who hate women say.

      Obama is starting to sour on people–he’s past his sell-by date.

      McCain, though he’s been on the shelf for years, is apparently a product that wears better in the eyes of most of America.

      Of course, the BEST candidate of all is the one that the DNC should have allowed to win, instead of gaming the results like they did. Everyone knows it, even the smart guy on the D ticket–and what he said bears repeating:

      “Make no mistake about it Hillary Clinton is as qualified as or more qualified than I am. And quite frankly, she may have been a better pick than me.”—Joe Biden.

      • Zelda Crunch

        Yes, it was–as was the FISH comment. It was Obama’s childish way of telling his supporters that he thinks Palin is a skank with a nasty-smelling hoo-hah.

        It could theoretically be a slur on what women’s pink parts are supposed to smell like as you seem to suggest; but I think that’s a bit too much of a stretch.

    • http://MaqisBHOTroll jd1

      gee, aren’t you really terribly glad and elated Matthew that McCain and not Obama will be answering the 3:00 AM call!! Don’t worry any more. It’s happenin’….go for it!

  • Capt Howdy

    I live and work in deepest Obama land. Champaign Il. starting in the primary I told these people if Obama was the nominee we would lose. always to hoots and derision and laughter. the laughter has stopped. and now I see only hate and blame in there tight pinched little faces as I pass them in the hallway.
    it is like I am the kid in the theater who refused to scream “I DO BELIEVE IN FARIES, I DO , I DO , I DO” and was therefor responsible for the death of tinkerbell.
    well you know what, fuck tinkerbell. and the clueless crowd he rode in on.

    • tek

      Champaign, IL is deepest Obama land? How sad. I know our college aged kids only support Obama because the other students at their college support him.

      Is anyone else reading that all Congresspeople who supported Hillary are being driven out of the Democratic Party? What is up with the Dem Party? It’s like the USSR.

      • Capt Howdy

        it is certainly the plan to marginalize the Clintons and anyone who supports ro supported them.
        well, like I said when all this started.
        after tinkerbell loses 49 states we will just SEE who get marginalized.

        • Mamatx

          That means he will win 8 states?

          LOL!

        • TheGhost

          It is probably more like the contents of this article…getting a set of extreme loyal “followers” for the storms to come set up in congress to pass whatever comes to mind.

          NO dissension allowed.

          http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=28804

          9 Sept 08 – “Obama Lied to ABC News”
          by Andy Martin

          WILLIAM AYERS HAS BEEN THE MASTERMIND BEHIND THE RISE OF BARACK OBAMA

          AYERS HAS DESIGNED AN OBAMA CAMPAIGN STRUCTURE WHICH IS BASED ON AYERS’ THEORIES OF MAOIST REVOLUTION.

          THE CHICAGO VERSION OF “FRIENDS”

          OBAMA LIED TO ABC NEWS AND A NATIONAL TV AUDIENCE

          (NEW YORK, NY)(September 9, 2008)

          Nailing down the relationship between “mad bomber” William Ayers and Barack Obama has been the greatest challenge of the 2008 presidential campaign.

          The second biggest challenge of 2008 has been deciphering and understanding Barack Obama’s campaign structure.

          His campaign is unlike any other presidential campaign in U. S. history.

          Obama’s operation is authoritarian, disciplined and centralized in Chicago.

          Obama’s reliance on a nationwide network of local “offices” and mailing lists points inexorably to a political latticework straight out of William Ayers’ revolutionary playbook.

          The bottom line: After an exhaustive investigation ContrarianCommentary.com can confirm that Barack Obama appears to be William Ayers’ “front” for a national, ongoing Maoist-style revolutionary campaign structure which will endure past November 4th.

          Ironically, as we searched for the Ayers-Obama relationship in the present, it was staring us in the face: Obama’s campaign is structured precisely the way Ayers would want.

          That is why Obama has created “Camp Obamas” across the United States to indoctrinate workers, and adopted other similar Fidel Castro/Hugo Chavez tactics.

          The puzzle pieces are finally starting to fall into place. Last week we asked why would Black Panther party revolutionary Khalid Al-Mansour start soliciting money for Obama’s legal education? The answer: Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, were close associates of the Black Panther Party and even unleashed a terrorist attack on a New York judge who heard a Panther case.

      • Capt Howdy

        oh and yeah, DEEPEST Obamaland. are you kidding?
        a hippie college town in IL?

        • tek

          No, I’m from Illinois. I attended U of I. It isn’t a hippie town at all. But I guess everyone in academics has gone completely nuts over Obambi.

          I would have thought Deepest Obama land would be the West and South Side of Chicago.

          • Capt Howdy

            well, my perceptions may be a bit skewed because I work in an industry where the average age is about 25. and thats only because I am more than twice that and blow the curve.
            it seems pretty heavily Obamaland to me. at least in Champaign. however I live in a tiny town a few miles away and it is not the case at all.
            not much love for Obama there.

            • Rob in Chicago

              I think that Champaign, Illinois is where Obama kicked off (formally) his presidential run, and where he returned to announce his VP choice. Obama certainly sees this college town as his base.

              • Disgusted

                Obama announced his run in Springfield IL and announced Biden in Springfield IL. On the steps of the State Capitol.

                • Disgusted

                  Isn’t that a fragmented mess? You get my point.

      • Enough o’Bama

        Is anyone else reading that all Congresspeople who supported Hillary are being driven out of the Democratic Party? What is up with the Dem Party? It’s like the USSR.

        There are a lot of Dems who won’t be sorry to see Obama lose.

        • Zelda Crunch

          And those who are sorry are the ones who have to go. An automatic cultural revolution.

      • http://lnab.newsvine.com/ Linda

        I would like to the link to that actually. I truly believe that if we don’t defeat Obama, it will be irreversibly turned into the New Obama Party.

        With his loss, lots of heads will be eligible to roll.

        Here’s who is at the top of my list
        Howard Dean
        Donna Brazile
        Nance Pelosi
        Harry Reid
        and a few other backstabbing, pandering asses

        • AnononoMale

          Can we put Nancy and Donna on top?

          • catdancer

            Please people, let’s not forget Rahm Emanuel. He’s the vicious wolverine behind the curtains. He’s Pelosi’s handler.

            PUMA

            • Rob in Chicago

              Rahm is my congressman, and I can’t wait to see who is on the ballot against him At this point, I’d be willing to vote for perrenial Chicago candidate, Ray Wardingly (a/k/a “Spanky the Clown”) just to get rid of the co-conspirators against the Clintons and the real Democratic party.

          • red_sleeves

            ….Nancy and Donna on top?

            You. Are. Sick.

        • Capt Howdy

          and most importantly the ONE will never be heard from again. because as Big Tent Democrat has said, in this climate if Obama loses he will be seen as the worst presidential candidate in history.
          personally I am buying stock in drug companies that make anti depressants before Nov 4th.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          Bill “Judas” Richardson.

        • CAZ

          I’m from MA and we are ticked at Ted & Kerry. Can they be on the list? Ted turning over the JFK mantle to Zero and both of them going against how their state voted. Arrogant asses both!

    • sproutingly

      I told the smug Obama supporters 6 months ago not to underestimate McCain and the Republicans (if simply on the rule that you never, ever underestimate your opponent). But did they listen to me? No!

      What we are seeing in Sarah Palin, judging from my living 15 years in the Upper Midwest, is a non-east coast, non-west coast feminist. Many women from the “fly-over” regions of our country do not like the term “feminist” because it connotes a liberal east-west coast mentality that they are not comfortable with. But the women in those vast regions of the country that the elites look down their noses at are every bit as strong. We just haven’t seen one take the national stage like this before, so the coastal pundits do not recognize her. She speaks for many, many women, and McCain’s move, though a huge gamble, can be seen as sheer genius, a master stroke on so many levels as illustrated in the original post.

      • AnononoMale

        I think Sen.Clinton might qualify in your categories.

    • Heather

      Go capn!

    • Enough o’Bama

      I live and work in deepest Obama land. Champaign Il.

      Ann Arbor, Michigan, here. I’d feel for ya but I’m too busy feelin’ for myself.

      I walk on eggshells with all my wife’s friends. And most of my friends too.

      • Monet

        For the first time in my life, I can discuss politics with my conservative friends. Except for Governor Palin, I’m not on her bandwagon. My liberal friends refuse to discuss politics with me, I’ve deserted the DNC for McCain. They think I’ve gone insane. With my liberal boyfriend, we can only discuss Governor Palin, the rest is off limits. If I climb on Governor Palin’s bandwagon, we won’t be discussing her either.

        This election is taking polarization to a new level.

        • voterinexile

          Monet – I’m experiencing the same thing with Obot friends. All ‘discussion’ is cut off, no re-hashing ‘what went wrong at the DNC’ – or how we got here.

          Never asked for my opinion – only admonished for a) supporting Hillary in the first place and b) finding Palin ‘likeable enough’.

          Facts are to New Dems same as under Bush.

          They offer ‘sympathy’ – they ‘hope’ i’m not voting for Palin just bec. she’s a woman and not voting against Obama based on skin color.

          These Obots are all white males in their 50s, my peers – all uninvolved in politics until Obama – while I’ve studied politics, been involved in Dem party for decades…

          Father knows best…tee hee.

    • Zelda Crunch

      I like your style, Capt Howdy! ;)

  • Perry Logan

    I’m puzzled by the Republicans’ desire to stay in power. After all, they had six years in power, and proved themselves the worst screw-ups in the known universe.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyrMS6MBuSg

    • McHope

      This was posted by mrt721 on the previous thread
      very informative

      I received this email yesterday

      “Hi Folks…facts are facts!!
      This will make you think a little, if not
      then keep your blinders on!”

      George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2
      years. The first six the economy was fine.

      A little over one year ago:

      1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2year high;
      2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
      3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.
      4) the DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +
      5) American’s were buying new cars,takingcruises, vacations o’seas, living large!…

      But American’s wanted ‘CHANGE’! So, in
      2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress &
      yep — we got ‘CHANGE’ all right.
      In the PAST YEAR:

      1) Consumer confidence has plummeted ;
      2) Gasoline is now over $4 a gallon &climbing !;
      3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
      4) Americans have seen their home equity
      drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS & prices still dropping;
      5) 1% of American homes are in foreclos ure.
      6) as I write, THE DOW is probing another
      low~~11,100–
      $2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM
      THEIR STOCKS BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS
      INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!!

      YEP , IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE!…AND WE SURE AS HECK GOT IT!!!….NOW OBAMA, THE DEM’S CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT–AND THE POLLS SAY HE’S GONNA BE ‘THE MAN’–CLAIMS HE’S GONNA REALLY GIVE U S CHANGE!!….

      JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YA THINK
      YOU CAN STAND???…..

      Don’t Let America become an Obamanation……..
      Vote for John McCain!

      • JP

        Finally.

        Push back.

        Thank you.

        • Irish1139

          Finally, someone putting the blame where it belongs. This is the worst congress we have ever had and it is full of democrats.

      • bmc

        McHope:

        That’s a very good argument for the RNC to make. Because it will stick. They should pick it up and run with it.

        Every day brings new fears for Democrats, and it’s truly sad to watch, considering we were all so high Nov. ’06.

        But, with Congress’ approval ratings lower than Bush, and Pelosi an object of near-universal scorn, the Democrats alienating a quarter of their base, and Barack Obama’s arrogance, I’m seeing the implosion of this party.

        I can’t say I’m sorry to see it. I’m a Dem voting for McCain/Palin. The Democratic Party deserves to lose this election.

      • McCain is Bush

        It wasn’t a democratic majority that gave us the War in Iraq, or 90% of what Bush has done. It was that pimple on the White House, facilitated by a republican majority. Nor was it the democrats who gave us the worst deficits in history or doubled the debt or dropped the dolloar 41%. It was all the fault of republicans. Try as you might, you can’t blame a democratic majority that’s existed for less than two years for all the republican chickens that are now coming home to roost. Nobody is stupid enough to go for that line. Except maybe for a certain predictable percentage of former Bush voters.

        You’re argument might occasion another lipstick on a pig comment.

        • McCain is Bush

          BTW, McCain is Bush, in every way that is of any actual consequence. And Palin is…who the hell actually knows?

    • wodiej

      actually Perry, like most pea brain pod bot trolls you are not informed. This is what the last 7 1/2 years have looked like:

      Comment by McHope | 2008-09-11 10:30:27

      This was posted by mrt721 on the previous thread
      very informative

      I received this email yesterday

      “Hi Folks…facts are facts!!
      This will make you think a little, if not
      then keep your blinders on!”

      George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2
      years. The first six the economy was fine.

      A little over one year ago:

      1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2year high;
      2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
      3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.
      4) the DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +
      5) American’s were buying new cars,takingcruises, vacations o’seas, living large!…

      But American’s wanted ‘CHANGE’! So, in
      2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress &
      yep — we got ‘CHANGE’ all right.
      In the PAST YEAR:

      1) Consumer confidence has plummeted ;
      2) Gasoline is now over $4 a gallon &climbing !;
      3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
      4) Americans have seen their home equity
      drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS & prices still dropping;
      5) 1% of American homes are in foreclos ure.
      6) as I write, THE DOW is probing another
      low~~11,100–
      $2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM
      THEIR STOCKS BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS
      INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!!

      YEP , IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE!…AND WE SURE AS HECK GOT IT!!!….NOW OBAMA, THE DEM’S CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT–AND THE POLLS SAY HE’S GONNA BE ‘THE MAN’–CLAIMS HE’S GONNA REALLY GIVE U S CHANGE!!….

      JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YA THINK
      YOU CAN STAND???…..

      Don’t Let America become an Obamanation……..
      Vote for John McCain!

      peddle your Obama horsehit somewhere else…

    • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

      Perry Logan,

      You have posted this at least 41 times at NoQuarterUSA in the past week. Don’t you think that is more than enough shilling for this trash?

      Please, give it a break.

    • red_sleeves

      Republicans’ are the worst screw-ups in the known universe?

      You don’t get out much, do you?

    • Zelda Crunch

      Are you staying around for dinner? Seems a lot of people here are planning on having you. On the table that is. ;)

  • looking for integrity

    Ladies and Gentlemen, meet Valerie Bowman Jarrett
    (my note: Obama’s Karl Rove)
    from Savaagepolitics.com (not affiliated with Michael Savage)

    Valerie Bowman was born on November 14, 1956 in Shiraz, Iran.

    Her father, Dr. James Bowman, ran a hospital for poor children. Her mother, Barbara Bowman, is an early childhood education expert and co-founder of the Erikson Institute for child development. Her maternal grandfather, Robert Taylor was the head of the Chicago Housing Authority in the 1940s.

    At age 5, she and her family moved to London for one year, then moved to Chicago in 1963. She received a B.A. in Psychology from Stanford University in 1978, and a JD from the University of Michigan Law School in 1981. She was married to William Robert Jarrett from 1983 to 1988. They had one child – a daughter – who is currently a Harvard Law student.

    I’m wondering why we haven’t heard anything about the ‘other woman’ in Barack’s life on Chris Matthews’ Hardball? or Keith Olberman’s Countdown? I don’t know for sure, but I think maybe her country of origin just might be something the Obama campaign chooses to keep from us. But the recent Democratic convention has found a way to introduce her to the American public, despite the DNC’s attempts to obscure her from our view.

    One advantage of a big, media-focused convention is that so many shadowy campaign “insiders” seek the spotlight. In Denver, Jarrett had been observed making the media rounds. Jarrett has been part of Obama’s inner circle since his days as an Illinois state senator.

    [photo]

    Above: Obama and Jarrett in January 2008, shortly before he characterized President and Senator Clinton as ‘racist’.

    She identifies herself as a Chicago businesswoman, but according to Obama campaign advisers, she is much more than that. She is Iranian-American, for one thing, and the Obama campaign has sought to keep her ties to Iran from press views, as it has also sought to keep her political background and deep and tangled business and personal relationship to the Obama family from sight. For example, while it’s true that Jarrett is a business executive, she also has been a well-known political operative for Chicago Democrats back to her days working in the background as an adviser to late Chicago mayor Harold Washington, as well as the Daley family.

    “She knows where are all the bodies have been buried in the past 30 or so years of Chicago politics and she knows all the tricks,” says one longtime Democrat political consultant in Chicago. “If Obama had a political and financial godmother, it would be Valerie Jarrett.”

    Despite the elaborate and ineffective smoke screen by the Obama campaign, Katie Couric, the CBS Evening News anchor who was summarily dismissed by others in the MSM as being ‘too much of a girl to be taken seriously about pertinent issues’ managed to sneak a peek to us on August 11, 2008 despite her characterization as a ‘fluffy bunny’.

    [video]

    Following is a portion of the transcribed conversation between Jarrett and Couric. Follow this link for the entire interview transcript aired on CBS, and follow this link for the unaired moment in Couric’s interview because of ‘time constraints’

    “They call her the other side of Barack Obama’s brain. A similar phrase was used to describe Karl Rove’s closeness to President Bush. But Valerie Jarrett – unlike Rove – is not a professional political strategist. She’s a business leader, a single mother, and, maybe, Chicago’s most powerful woman after Oprah Winfrey. A former adviser to Mayor Daley, Jarrett’s earned the complete confidence of Barack and Michelle Obama, and both Obamas say they don’t make a big decision without consulting her first. Valerie Jarrett is someone America will see a lot more of between now and Election Day, and maybe for years to come.”

    Katie Couric: You first met the Obamas when you were trying to hire Michelle.

    Valerie Jarrett: I did.

    Katie Couric: for a job.

    Valerie Jarrett: I was trying to recruit her into city government when I was Mayor Daley’s deputy chief of staff. In fact, I offered her a job on the spot. She was just so extraordinary.

    Katie Couric: And before she took the job, she wanted you to meet her fiancée?

    Valerie Jarrett: She did. In fact the three of us had dinner – and you know she had some serious reservations about whether to leave the practice of law and leap into the mayor’s office into a political environment. And the two of them said ‘How about we have dinner and talk this through.’ And I knew that if that the conversation didn’t go well, the two of them were gonna go home and say, “Well, not so much. Maybe that’s not the right move.” So at the end of the dinner I did say well, did I pass the test? And he laughed and of course she did join us and made a huge difference.

    Jarrett has now known the Obamas for 17 years, and is one of their closest friends, Couric reports. Her title on the campaign is senior adviser – which means she often serves as Obama’s surrogate at meetings and events he can’t attend. After Michelle, Valerie Jarrett may be one of the people he trusts the most.

    Katie Couric: What do you envision yourself doing if Senator Obama is successful and elected?

    Valerie Jarrett: I can’t even go there. You know, it’s a very simple question. You’d think I could answer it. I can’t. It’s a distraction. It’s a distraction. And Senator Obama tells us to keep focused. And as Michelle says not getting ahead of ourselves.

    Valerie Jarrett is part of a new generation of black leaders, and her biggest influence is her pioneering parents, reports Couric.

    So, Valerie, you would like us to believe that you have nothing to gain because of your personal relationship with the Obama family? You say “I can’t even go there, It’s a distraction”? Then you should have a word with some of your friends, who beg to differ:

    Jarrett, according to friends, gave Michelle Obama professional advice before she married Obama, and helped her with jobs. But more important, say Chicago Democrats who know Jarrett and Obama’s history, and why the Obama campaign has desperately sought to keep Jarrett’s role in the campaign under wraps, Jarrett may be to Obama what James McDougal was to Bill and Hillary Clinton. McDougall, a central figure in the Clinton’s Whitewater Scandal, gave the Clintons the financial wherewithal to raise their national political visibility. “Jarrett has done that for Barack and Michelle three or four times over,” says one insider, noting that Jarrett served as the CEO of a housing development company.

    And Obama has returned the favor: Jarrett is the chief executive of Habitat Co., which developed and managed large housing projects in and around Chicago — and in Obama’s state legislative district — that were subsidized by federal and state housing dollars, and which were ultimately seized by federal authorities for what were unlivable conditions. While overseeing the company that managed these housing facilities, Jarrett also worked with long-time Obama friend and convicted felon Tony Rezko in raising money for Obama’s political career.

    Obama campaign advisers have sought to have Jarrett fully vetted by the campaign to prepare for opposition research from the McCain campaign, fearing that she may have deeper and longstanding ties to financial entities associated with the subprime mortgage scandal.

    “That and her ties to Chicago politicians and her Iranian background, and you have a potential nightmare,” says a Democrat media consultant who worked for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. “Say what you want about Hillary, but she didn’t have that kind of a triple threat on her team.”

    Putting makeup on a pig indeed!

    {Bot Advisory: Before you start to whine that this is just another smear, please be advised that the information in this article has been complied from public information available from various media sources, including Valerie Jarrett’s approved professional biography.}

    ©2008 SAVAGEPOLITICS.com. All Rights Reserved.

    • csuzeq

      She is a single mother??? How dare she work! I suggest she resign her position right now because campaigning takes a lot of time and energy and she won’t then have any left for her kids! How dare Obama put a women in such a powerful position when she has a child to care for!

      If she’s just corrupt, well, we can deal with that, but a mother???? Unacceptable!

      -memo from the
      Do
      Nothing
      Committee

      • Zelda Crunch

        She is a single mother??? How dare she work!

        But she’s BLACK – and that entitles her to a LOT of things. Including being above the law and customs, fraternising with terrorists, and being able to afford piggishly expensive jewelry.

    • tzada

      Barry and his Iranian friend look none to pleased to be getting this picture taken.

      http://savagepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2.jpg

      Good information thanks for the article

  • tek

    Also, it makes me really angry that while the Obama Dems are insisting that Hillary and Bill get out and save Obama’s butt, the party is trying to destroy all of Hillary’s supporters. Really, it’s creepier than the antics of Dubya and Cheney.

    • Capt Howdy

      it is indeed.
      but you know what. Bill and Hill are not concerned. they know politics as well as anyone alive. they also know everything the republicans know about Barry (best oppo research in the world) and so they know he will not win. they will do what they need to do to prop his sorry ass up and then come in and clean up the mess when its over and start getting ready for the next round.

      • tek

        May it be so.

        • Zelda Crunch

          Second that!

  • No Obama for me

    Perry Logan,

    Puzzled by the Republicans desire to stay in power,
    Perhaps you are just stupid.

    America wants the best and brightest for our leaders,
    no matter whether it be Republican or Democrat.

    Why would any American Citizen want Barack Obama who probably is not even a legal citizen, so far that is not proven.
    He is a joke in every way. Joe Biden even says that Hillary would be better than him and she also would be better than Obama.
    I am thrilled and excited by what John McCain and Governor Sarah offers our country.
    Integrity is on the move and it matters not which party but the people who represent that party.
    McCain/Palin will win in November.

    • Perry Logan

      I just don’t understand why the Republicans want to be in the spotlight, when the years 2000-2006 prove that being in power just doesn’t work out very well for them. They’re much better at screwing things up from the sidelines.

      • Rob in Chicago

        Perry:
        I’d say, “Follow the money.” The Republicans in Congress have always been a much more effective “minority” party than have been the Democrats, and they have pretty much sucked at the “governance thing” when they were in the majority. But you can make a lot more money when you are actually in power. Lobbyists dole out the goodies to both parties, but those in the majority or in power get the most money.

      • Zelda Crunch

        Oh Perry you’re such a troll!

        Someone please pass the onion sauce!

  • JP

    Plus, by picking Palin McCain proves Obama is nothing but an-empty-suit-celebrity. Just look at him running around, shooting his mouth and thinking he is being such a clever bugger with his lipstick jabs. What Obama wants to be, McCain is. What Obama talks about, McCain has a record of.

    Obama is words.

    McCain is action.

    Pure.

    and

    Simple.

    • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

      Well said.

  • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

    AS I’VE SAID BEFORE————

    AS I RECENTLY SAID——————-

    Anytime Obama prefaces an answer to a question with one of these statements uou know he is getting ready to come out with another flip flop.(Or another lie.)

    His pig comment WAS directed at Palin just as his stinking fish comment WAS directed at John McCain.

    When he saw the reaction to these statements (other from his loving audience) he began to back-pedal. Couple these statements with his giving Hillary the finger and dusting her off his shoulders, Mr. Arrogant A@@ had better start thinking twice before showing his ignorance or his numbers are going to tank that much more.

    He’s running scared, people, therefore he’s becoming more rabid like the cornered rat that he is.

  • HARP

    Palin’s Entry Gives GOP Ticket
    Shot at Capturing the Youth Vote

    Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama has long enjoyed a huge edge among college students and voters in their 20s. Republicans now are seeing their first real chance to make inroads with that group. The key: Young voters may see the 44-year-old Gov. Palin as in tune with their concerns in a way that Sen. John McCain, her 72-year-old running mate, could never be.

    “She reminds me of my friends,” said Allyson Wartick, 20, a sophomore at the University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee.

    Just two weeks ago, the mood on campus “was definitely, ‘Obama is the cool place to be,’” said Jennifer Kacerosky, 21, a senior at the University of Florida. This past weekend, though, she went to a football game sporting a McCain-Palin button, and “it was, ‘Where’d you get that? I need that!”

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122109607230421889.html?mod=todays_us_page_one

  • typical.white.person

    Electoral college comfort?

    Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight has a model that, as I understand it, uses both state and national polls to calculate probabilities of an electoral college win. He currently shows Obama 48%, McCain 52%.

  • http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/ Not Your sweetie

    and the media shilling is turning people off
    http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/populism-vs-the-media/

  • DancingOpossum

    I’m puzzled by the Republicans’ desire to stay in power. After all, they had six years in power, and proved themselves the worst screw-ups in the known universe.

    HAHAAHAHA…so true!! The last eight years are living breathing proof that Republican policies do not work, period.

    That said, it’s worth going through four more years of Hell to have 12 to 16 years of Democratic rule afterward–and let’s face it, whoever wins this GE is going to be the most sorry miserable SOB in existence, attempting to clean up the huge bag of garbage that Bush & Gang left behind, and being blamed for all the awful stuff that will keep happening–and likely get worse.

    Sadly, I think Hillary could have made a solid effort at it and even accomplished some small thing. I don’t think EITHER McCain or Obama can, they’ll be hamstrung by all the huge stinking pile that Dubya will leave as his parting gift. So it really doesn’t matter who wins this time EXCEPT insofar as it has an impact on who wins the next time.

    • csuzeq

      Hillary would have accomplished universal healthcare for all, not a small thing. Make no mistake, Hillary would have gotten some stuff done!

    • Docelder

      12 to 16 years of Democratic rule afterward

      Exactly the problem we are facing. Democrats in congress were given power two years ago… power given from the people of this nation in good faith… and instead of using that power for good… it has been misused to promote a hard leftist agenda. Obama is the “illegitimate child” of this power orgy. I really believe McCain has it within him to help this nation heal and come together. I hope after this four years… the people “rule” themselves again.

      • wodiej

        I agree…and people keep using Bush as a prop to support Obama. Bush is not running and McCain is not him.

      • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

        I think your conclusion is very wrong. What some have done is to exercise Congress’ oversight responsibility. The real problem is that they have worried about their power when they should have taken action–impeachment as one example, kicking Leiberman out of the party as another.

        McCain will be good in several ways:

        1. He is a leader and has legislative experience. He will deliver change and will work with Congress to achieve it.

        2. He will put someone competent in the White House with experience, integrity, and strong, respectable character who loves and has given much for America.

      • AnononoMale

        What Leftist agenda? I’d love to see some Leftist from those miscreants in Congress. No impeachment. FISA approved. No health care for all. Show me some Left, please!

    • Zelda Crunch

      How do you cook and season opossum? Bake in the oven? Baste with butter? Any herbs?

    • McCain is Bush

      I’m just afraid that after 4 more years the democrats will be presiding over a country in a state of total economic ruin.

      A doubled national debt and a 41% drop in the dollar in a mere 8 years, with all tendencies accelerating under republican economic policy…

      Run those same trends out for another 4 years and see what America looks like.

  • DancingOpossum

    American’s were buying new cars,takingcruises, vacations o’seas, living large!…

    They were paying for all of this by using their homes as ATMs, a pyramid scheme the Republicans cheered on because it was the only thing propping up the sinking economy (which was “not fine” for six years, it was tottering on all this funny money), but the inevitable crash of the housing market has revealed that for the lousy Ponzi scheme it was. Nobody is taking cruises now, they are too worried about getting foreclosed on the house that was supposed to pay for their kids’ college education, their retirement, and all those vacations. If we had had a real economy like the one we had under Clinton–you know, where people actually had well-paying jobs and businesses thrived–instead of one where bankers gave $600,000 home loans to grocery store checkers and everyone lived off the “equity”–we wouldn’t be in such bad shape.

    • wodiej

      Two ways to look at this. People were irresponsible and overspent by using credit w no way to repay their debt. That is not a Republican or Democrat issue, that is a lack of responsibility and accountability issue. The rest of us are paying for it too and personally I am damn sick and tired of paying for everyone else to do as they please w no repurcussions for their actions, government and corporations included.

      • Docelder

        Yes, and we always seem to be putting another “band-aid” on somebody’s butt every time they won’t show just a bit of personal responsibility. I am for helping those who need help… But are we validating “irresponsibility” as a lifestyle choice?

        • roseeriter

          That’s how the liberals supporting Obama think.
          Freedom to choose whatever..

          NOBAMA!

  • http://popcornisafoodgroup.com NQ Popcorn and Snack Concession Stand

    It is fun watching Obama and his troll army of brownshirts squirm.

    And great for my business here!

    Larry, my concession stand rent check will be early this month!

  • Objective analysis

    Let’s just say the Republicans said “Check mate”

    LOL!

    PUMA 2008!

    P.S. I don’t blame Obama, he is an inexperienced guy. The blame needs to go to:

    1. Howard Dean
    2. Ted Kennedy
    3. Nancy Pelosi
    4. Donna Brazile
    5. Pres. Jimmy Carter (which Obama is a reincarnation of)
    6. Joe Biden
    7. John Kerry

    and all the left wing liberals who thought the presidency was a cake walk

    Obama is young and naive. He is like a little baby. The DNC adults made the big mistake in my opinion in thinking a baby should lead them.

    • Docelder

      This is not over until we get reform in Washington and until the parties … emphasis on plurality… are purged and reformed. We are all Americans and really do have much more in common than we have differences. I hope from all of this the importance of that is not somehow lost… again.

    • Read my lipstick

      I disagree with your assessment that BO is naive and thus blameless.

      He is well-schooled in the corrupt Chigago politics thuggery and an active and willing participant in the hijacking of the DNC.

      There is nothing that BO does by accident.

      IMO, any politician who goes along with BO’s tactics is a guilty accomplice in the corruption of the DNC.

      • Fenelon spoke

        I agree with you, Lipstick. I don’t think Obama is naive at all but very Mcahiavellian.

      • voterinexile

        BO is naive AND calculating at the same time – lethal combination. Why no one trusts him – which is it Barack? – the ruthless back-room dealer, or the pompous undisciplined narcissist?

        Errors will manifest from both sides of the ledger.

        He has no saving grace.

    • http://lnab.newsvine.com/ Linda

      Tom Daschle’s

      another purveyor of advancing incompetent candidates

    • Zelda Crunch

      I don’t blame Obama, he is an inexperienced guy.

      I disagree. I think you are way too kind.

      I think Obama is as crooked as the day is long.

  • McHope

    OT but not sure where else to post it.

    On the anniversary of the most terrible attack on American soil it is striking to again see the contrast of these candidates.
    Speaking at Ground Zero this morning was Rudy Guliani.
    Speaking at the Pentagon was President Bush.
    Speaking at the crash site in PA was John McCain.
    All were speaking with personally and giving support to people at each event.

    Is there no Democrat who wishes to extend a thought or words of sympathy or encouragement to the families of victims or people of this country?

    Yes, the news has reported with regularity that Barack Obama has a planned event scheduled with John McCain to visit the site in NY.
    But it rings hollow. His contributions to the healing of this nation after 9/11 range from denouncing the flag pin unprovoked to making the argument that we need to be more tolerant of other countries and rogue leaders. He shows compassion for those who are born and bred to hate and kill us.

    When asked about the question of evil during the Hassleback interview McCain clearly said Evil exists and he plans to stop it. He vowed to hold Bin Laden accountable. What did Obama say? His perception of evil rested nicely here in America.

    Obama has left many clues as to his inner thoughts… flag pins, the National Anthem is too violent to place a hand on his heart but 99 problems is fine, other countries don’t like us, his world rock concert tour, citizen of the world comment, America is a great country let’s change it, talking to rogue dictators without preconditions, Russia and Georgia are equal and should play nice,Iran is and is not a threat, voting against funding our troops, vowing to lessen our defense budget and military.
    The people he’s aligned himself with speak to Anti Americanism even more ferverently.

    Why on Earth would anyone believe this man has the best interest of America at heart? He speaks loudly and often to show that he doesn’t. Beyond his own ambition for power, who can say what his real agenda or motivation is?

    It is troubling to the point of desperation to think this man may be elected.
    What am I missing? Where is the good people see in this man.

    • Tess

      BRILLIANT, McHope. Thanks for the connections.

      PUMA

    • voterinexile

      Saddleback Forum, Not ‘Hasselback’ – Eliz. Hasselbeck is on The View…

      Good comments tho – Zbig was on MSNBC this morning touting The New World Order which dovetails with your comments.

      I don’t know how this happened but on every single issue (save Universal Healthcare) the Dems are too far left for most people.

      As if, The Left wants to live in a utopian sci-fi novel.

      • McHope

        Sorry, Freudian slip. Just saw Elizabeth speak about Michelle Obama providing a list of topics not allowed for her appearance on the view.

    • Zelda Crunch

      Hold on and let me get this straight, for I too heard Obama was visiting ground zero today.

      Are you saying Obama did not show at ground zero today 911?

    • TheGhost

      Obama’s Real Agenda! Here it is!

      http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=28804

      9 Sept 08 – “Obama Lied to ABC News” Andy Martin

      WILLIAM AYERS HAS BEEN THE MASTERMIND BEHIND THE RISE OF BARACK OBAMA

      AYERS HAS DESIGNED AN OBAMA CAMPAIGN STRUCTURE WHICH IS BASED ON AYERS’ THEORIES OF MAOIST REVOLUTION.

      THE CHICAGO VERSION OF “FRIENDS”

      OBAMA LIED TO ABC NEWS AND A NATIONAL TV AUDIENCE

      (NEW YORK, NY)(September 9, 2008)

      Nailing down the relationship between “mad bomber” William Ayers and Barack Obama has been the greatest challenge of the 2008 presidential campaign.

      The second biggest challenge of 2008 has been deciphering and understanding Barack Obama’s campaign structure.

      His campaign is unlike any other presidential campaign in U. S. history.

      Obama’s operation is authoritarian, disciplined and centralized in Chicago.

      Obama’s reliance on a nationwide network of local “offices” and mailing lists points inexorably to a political latticework straight out of William Ayers’ revolutionary playbook.

      The bottom line: After an exhaustive investigation ContrarianCommentary.com can confirm that Barack Obama appears to be William Ayers’ “front” for a national, ongoing Maoist-style revolutionary campaign structure which will endure past November 4th.

      Ironically, as we searched for the Ayers-Obama relationship in the present, it was staring us in the face: Obama’s campaign is structured precisely the way Ayers would want.

      That is why Obama has created “Camp Obamas” across the United States to indoctrinate workers, and adopted other similar Fidel Castro/Hugo Chavez tactics.

      The puzzle pieces are finally starting to fall into place. Last week we asked why would Black Panther party revolutionary Khalid Al-Mansour start soliciting money for Obama’s legal education? The answer: Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, were close associates of the Black Panther Party and even unleashed a terrorist attack on a New York judge who heard a Panther case.

      In the 1980’s, the Ayers/Dohrn revolutionary terror network was still working through individuals such as Al-Mansour, who had sufficiently laundered his radical past to assume respectability as a front for a Saudi Prince. The same way Ayers laundered his own past to become a professor of “education” at Illinois’ taxpayer-subsidized university.

      Ayers and Al-Mansour appear to have been in contact. Ayers vouched for Obama to Al-Mansour, who then began a law school fund-raising campaign among prominent African-Americans.

      Obama’s law degree thus appears to have been financed through the encouragement of persons who had been violent revolutionaries and remain unrepentant to this day, the same unconventional way the purchase of Obama’s Chicago mansion was party financed by an Iraqi billionaire.

      Why did Obama get hired as a “summer associate” in 1989 at the law firm which had hired Ayers’ wife, and where Ayers’ father was a prominent friend of the managing partner at Sidley & Austin? The answer is obvious. Ayers was grooming Obama as his future “front.”

      Where did Obama get his first and only legal job after Harvard? At a law firm where Tony Rezko was a prominent client and where name partner Judson Miner was a law school classmate of Bernadine Dohrn-Ayers. Yes, the pieces are starting to come together.

  • Rose

    Wow. Obama and his supporters are outraged that his comments are being taken out of context (if that’s the case), but they were perfectly fine doing the same to the Clintons. Do MLK & Robert Kennedy ring a bell? What goes around comes around.

  • S&T

    The best revenge came for me today when the Democrats called me asking for a two hundred dollar donation. I told them no and asked them if they wanted to know why. I told them they kicked Hillary to the curb so they would not ever get any money from me.

  • http://www.noquarterusa.net Linda

    Obama chose to surround himself most of his life with [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR]. If the american people are so stupid as to elect this unknown with his creepy emblems, etc., then we are not the people I always believed we were. To all followers: Be careful what you wish for……..

    • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

      You are way off base with this. This is offensive as well as incorrect. You’ve made other comments that are rather offensive in this and other threads. How about more respectable conversation as this is not Daily KOS or TPM.

      Thanks!

      • ce415

        Matthew,
        I think there is a little of Biden trying to make nice with Hillary here inaddition to notinig the obvious (to us anyway) and hoping he may still be able to keep some support for Obama from vanishing. Kind of like “we Dems can treat our women with respect” Although it is way to late and the barn door is closed and locked.

      • Zelda Crunch

        Wow! What’s “[DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR]“? I can’t even imagine what would be so terrible!

    • http://deleted Buzz Latte

      Auchi, Rezko, al Mansour, etc are top of the barrel, are you suggesting that Matthew?

      “…I’ll stand with the muslims.” is patriotic?

      Linda may overstate to your liking but there is truth in the post.

      Let’s not be an overprotective parent with Obama.

      • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

        I was absolutely not protecting Obama. I simply felt that the language/tone was unnecessary and painted a ethnic stereotype that was offensive.

        • http://deleted Buzz Latte

          Oh, I get it. Being PC was more important than expressing opinion.

          It still doesn’t erase Obama associations, though does it.

  • OxyCon

    In 10 years, Obama will be on VH1′s “Surreal Life” living with Mini Me, Screech, Gary Coleman, Erkel and a few ex-porn stars, just like all the other has-been celbrities.

    • Rob in Chicago

      OxyCon:

      That is delicious!! I’m thinking of so many more “celebretards” that there would need to be additional “VH” channels. And hosting these shows? How about Keith Olbermann or Chris Matthews ? They could bad-mouth the other contestants to assure that Bambi wins.

  • hootnannie

    Obama doesn’t have the judgment to be President if he didn’t realize the pig/fish remarks were likely to be perceived as vulgar, misogynistic, and directed at Palin. And he didn’t have the class to apologize, but merely continued to huck it up and make fun of his detractors. And apparently his veep choice has realized that in less than 2 months he’ll be back in the Senate with Hillary for at least 4 more years (unless Mac appoints her to the Cabinet). Bobo will be there only till Illinois votes again for Senator (unless an indictment forces him to resign).

  • kcfromtx

    In 2001, the Obama’s had a taxable income nearing 300,000. They gave 0.5% to charity. In 2002, they gave 0.4%. Most Americans donated heavily in 2001. Not the Obamas. Speaks volumes about their character.

    • voterinexile

      I think the Clinton’s give 10% to charity.

  • NYSmike

    Why are the dems nervous? Because they also see that their selection seems to be bringing down the dems for Congressional and Senate elections as well.

  • Ben David

    Quoting Mr Broder. (Oh you remember him right? He was the journalist back in 2007 that wrote about HRC’s marriage and sex life with WJC.) I digress:
    “exaggerated optimism has swept through Republican ranks and an equally exaggerated gloom has infected the Democrats.”
    I beg to differ. The optimism on the republican side is real. Make no mistake about it, and the gloom on the democratic side is real too.
    I have a feeling and I have written about it and to again say I believe obama does not really want to be president. I believe he wants to be the “NEW” leader of the AA community to replace Jesse and Al and all those from the old school. When he loses in November he will be remembered as a loser. i e Gore, Kerry, Dukakis, but will have major support from within the AA community and he will still be riding tall in the saddle so to speak.
    Yes, the democratic party was so hung up on the “idea” of obama they forgot they needed someone to win the damn thing. Then when the dem nominee had the chance to do “the right thing” and chose HRC, he balked, and was “checked” by McCain when he selected Gov. Palin. obama will be checkmated on November 4, 2008.
    For obama to be checked, McCain made a move so that one of his pieces attacks the opposing king and that would be Sarah Palin. With this move McCain made a move which exposed obama to a discovered check. With obama in check and there is no legal move which gets obama out of check, obama is said to be checkmated and come november 4th, the game is over.

  • McCain is Bush

    We’ll get our next wave of Buyer’s Remorse if McCain and Palin are elected, sometime shortly after the novelty of having a woman as vice president wears off. That’s when people will suddenly realize the stolen republican change slogan was nothing but a cheap campaign trick, that the reform message was only hype that was groundless to begin with, and that there’s a damn good reason the hope part of Obama’s message was left to the democrats.

    You all get tired of the question, but here it is again:

    Specifically what part of the Bush policy of the last 8 years has McCain said he’s going to change?

    • maniaco

      . . . or:

      Specifically what part of the Bush policy of the last 8 years has Obama said he’s going to change?

      BHO is much more Bush III than McCain, IMHO.

      • McCain is Bush

        Not when you look at the policies and issues. That’s why the republicans are doing everything in their power to keep people from doing that.

        Do you think lipstick and pigs can divert attention from what really matters for over 50 more days?

    • bemused

      Signing statements.

  • fred

    Obama covers his tracks

    Barack Obama apparently wishes his two autobiographies to be the definitive record of his past. He has blocked efforts by others who wish to independently examine his past.
    He won’t allow his transcript from his undergraduate days at Columbia University to be released.
    He “lost” his thesis on Soviet nuclear policy (see “Where in the World is Obama’s Missing Thesis“ which might provide insight regarding his seeming lack of knowledge about Soviet policy during the Kennedy years).
    He won’t answer questions about his days at Harvard Law School.
    continue reading: http://countusout.wordpress.com/

  • Dot

    The worse reason for Obama losing the Presidency will be Biden. Obama will say that Biden was the reason he lost because Biden was weak. He will never admit that he was the weak link.

  • Zelda Crunch

    an equally exaggerated gloom has infected the Democrats

    Schadenfreude but I’m happy about it. They deserve it (and more) the way they’ve been carrying on. Perhaps they’ll be lucky and become emotionally mature by 2012.

    • McCain is Bush

      I’ll admit it’s a bit depressing to witness how easily many Americans can be duped by a cynical, contentless republican political campaign, but I’ve developed a certain level of acceptance after watching the election and reelection of the moral canker currently defacing the Oval Office.

      It’s also been a bit depressing to watch the John McCain campaign descend to the same level of conduct that the Bush campaign descended to a few years ago in order to defeat him. I really thought McCain a better man than that. I believe he once was. Now he looks like a sell-out, allowing a campaign that any honest American should be deeply ashamed of, while playing on his past reputation to the American people a patently phony bill of goods.

      I’m not so depressed about democratic prospects in November just yet. The republican smear tactics are at last beginning to taint the republicans themselves, to the extent that relying heavily on them may prove to be totally counterproductive. Their empty campaign platform may be revealed as a cover for 4 more years of Bush policy during the upcoming debates. Even after all of the smear efforts and the beautification of Sarah Palin, the republicans really don’t have a significant lead in the polls. The small lead they have seems to have stabilized.

      Bush declared “Mission Accomplished” over 5 years ago. It might be a little early to begin celebrating a McCain/Palin win in November.

  • Zelda Crunch

    their Democratic counterparts have panicked and called for Obama to start fighting

    Obama has no way to fight. He’s used many ways to cheat but fighting implies integrity on policies and Obama by definition (and character) has no integrity. This is no a slur – it’s simply the bare naked truth.

  • HRC2008

    So…why don’t you do some research and tell me how many times Obama has used this very ‘common’ expression IN HIS LIFE. I will bet you he has NEVER used it before. He was talking about Palin. Just like he gave Hillary the finger. He doesn’t scratch his face with his middle finger – except THAT time. He just thinks he can pretend he is innocent and that makes it so.

  • Sassy

    Matthew,
    Surely you jest! Remorse?
    BO is a racist, crude, corrupt, under-handed, ill-mannered liar!
    BUT, he speaks SO well!!!

  • Ani

    No wonder Obama is running scared. His 15 minutes is up. He is buried in his own sexism, partnered with a missing VP candidate that says Clinton was a better choice, and surrounded by followers that are hate-filled and vile in their attacks on his opponents.

    Yes, McCain has good reason to have a grin on his face.

    Wow, Matthew. Well put. Thanks for this.

  • b mathews

    BARKY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS SAYING RE :LIPSTICK ON A PIG. NOTICE IN THE VIDEO HE PAUSES HALF WAY THRU WAITING FOR HIS AUDIENCE TO REACT (AS HE KNEW THEY WOULD). THEN HE HOLDS HIS HEAD REALIZING HOW THIS WAS GOING TO SOUND BUT ONCE HE STARTED HE COULDNT STOP HIMSELF. HE JUST WANTED THE APPLAUSE FROM HIS ADORING AUDIENCE. JUST AS THE WORD “FAIRYTALE ” BECAME BECAME A RACIAL SLUR (ACCORDING TO THE OBOTS)..THE WORD “LIPSTICK” HAS NOW TAKEN ON A DIFFERENT MEANING…SO YES BARKY…WORDS MATTER.

  • DancingOpossum

    This is the worst congress we have ever had

    Did you sleep through the 90s??

    People were irresponsible and overspent by using credit w no way to repay their debt. That is not a Republican or Democrat issue, that is a lack of responsibility and accountability issue.

    I completely agree. I am furious that we taxpayers are being forced to bail out irresponsible home-”owners” and even more irresponsible lenders and bank. All I’m saying is that it was Republican economic policies that put us in this situation–and it’s a Republican president who is pushing the bailout.

    And why are some of you dumping on Perry Logan? He’s long been one of the most insightful anti-Obama posters here. WTF??? Because he’s not a Republican?? Guess what: Most of us are not. I’m a left-liberal Dem and proud of it. Doesn’t mean I’m voting for BO.

    • http://deleted Buzz Latte

      Matthew seems to be having a conflicted day. Great article and yes, I hear of buyers’ remorse in WA state over Obama. BUT>>>

      It wasn’t necessary to single out Perry Logan or Linda.

  • indypol

    “Monet – I’m experiencing the same thing with Obot friends. All ‘discussion’ is cut off, no re-hashing ‘what went wrong at the DNC’ – or how we got here.”

    Ditto. My o_bot acquaintances are deeply confused about Palin, and profoundly concerned about Obama’s viability. This is the worst buyers remorse for a political candidate that I have ever seen. And the question is always ‘what’s wrong with America.’ O-bots are profoundly non-reflective; they never examine their past behavior, their complicity as Odumbo practically raped HRC and her supporters during the convention, ripping the legitimacy of the nomination process to shreds. They turned a blind eye to his mediocrity and corruption, and now they wonder why it’s all falling apart.

    I don’t feel sorry for them or their pathetic candidate. May they both go down with the ship.

    Hillary ’12
    Hillary write-in ’08

  • http://deleted Buzz Latte

    A friend of ours said that the Obots are really confused and silent over Obama in WA state that they know. They sometimes quasi-express that they feel like they’ve been had by the Democrats.

    Our friend said that they act as if Obama has already lost and are saying good things about Palin.

    Where we live now I’ve seen maybe a total of five Obama signs. In fact the Obama volunteers are being shipped to CO to canvas door to door. That sounds rather like a desparate move. I can’t say Obama doesn’t deserve it.

    He has been the worst candidate – including Carter, Humphrey, and McGovern to ever have been selected.

    Karma is indeed a bitch in an orange pantsuit, and in a PA federal courtroom, and in a campaign stop, and in a comment about pigs and lipstick, and in a unrepentant preacher, and in a domestic terrorist associate, and in a corruption trial, and in a militant wife, and in a fabricated life. Obama only has himself to blame.

  • Kara4McCain-Palin

    Obama Says Sarah Palin Has Zero Experience. Let’s See…

    Barack Obama said that Sarah Palin has ZERO experience. Let’s see if you agree…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obrd9uHpGRE