ABC Busted On Hiding Sarah Palin’s Full Answers- Updated with abc news contarct url

NewsBusters has the detailed and a link to the original transcript, but a teaser of the type of
things ABC deliberately didn’t show the viewing public is below: (Contact Form to ABC below the post, in case some want to ask them why they cut out important portions of Palin’s answers)

Next we see that Palin was not nearly as hostile towards Russia as was presented in the edited interview:

GIBSON: Let me ask you about some specific national security situations.

PALIN: Sure.

GIBSON: Let’s start, because we are near Russia, let’s start with Russia and Georgia.

The administration has said we’ve got to maintain the territorial integrity of Georgia. Do you believe the United States should try to restore Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia and Abkhazia?

PALIN: First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there. I was able to speak with him the other day and giving him my commitment, as John McCain’s running mate, that we will be committed to Georgia. And we’ve got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable and we have to keep…

GIBSON: You believe unprovoked.

PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals. That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.

And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?

PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

We also see from Palin’s following remark, which was also edited out, that she is far from some sort of latter day Cold Warrior which the edited interview made her seem to be:

We cannot repeat the Cold War. We are thankful that, under Reagan, we won the Cold War, without a shot fired, also. We’ve learned lessons from that in our relationship with Russia, previously the Soviet Union.

We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.

The portion that NewsBusters put in bold are whole segments of Palin’s answers that they just edited out and didn’t make available to the public.

All interviews are edited but the bias shown in how the interview was presented to the American public in relation to the actual answers that were given by Palin, shows an incredible amount of behind the scenes deliberation to show the public only what they wanted them to see instead of what the public wanted to see, which was all of Palin’s answers.

NewsBusters has much more information on removed segments of Sarah Palin’s answers.

Read the whole interview to see how ABC has tried to play the public.

I am adding the contact URL for ABC News, so people who see how much of Palin’s answers were deliberately hid from the viewing public, can ask them why they felt the need to hide Sarah Palin’s full answers from people that depended on the television interview to get the answers about Palin they were seeking.

. Now why would Charlie Gibs Send Charlie Gibson a letter /email and ask him why?Make sue that you includ this and ask him for a reprint or have hin state this on his sjhow now>

He will loose DRAMATICALLY in this election and hopefully we can run Howard Dean and his whole elite cabal into the ocean.

As an ex-gangbanger who set his life straight and is angry at the Obama elites, when Obama looses, I am going to go around kicking the shit out of his ‘followers’ then steal their credit cards and cash.

I’ll show them what real class warfare is about, since they seem to love it so much, at least, rhetorically.

Obama was the wrong black man and AAs who threatened the livelihood of others AAs for not supporting the One prove to me that the black community is not ready for a black president.

Threats of race riots if he isn’t elected? What kind of promise is that for the country you supposedly love. There has been an immaturity about this campaign from the beginning that I have not experienced before. There has also been division, threats of violence, and an irresponsible media that has not been present before. My country has been turned into a very scary place for voters since the primaries.

I don’t think the black community is ready for a black president.

“I for one am sick of the Harvard and Yale elites, I’ll take a former prisoner of war and a hard working not rich mom any day.”

Shades of the old William F. Buckley quote, where he said that we’d be better off if the Congress were filled with 435 people chosen at random out of the Boston phone book, rather than 435 of the faculty at Harvard.

If she thinks it is to the country’s benefit to start fractionating people and encouraging group-on-group power struggles, she isn’t the person to bring anyone together. In my opinion, it reflects a person who is alienated from a much larger world and is committed to retreating and building walls instead of reaching out to build bridges.

And in her conclusion, about giving back to the black community–I’m at a loss. How is being a loud-mouth, bitter, angry woman who subverts historical preservation, disengages from public schools (and the PTA), turns away people from the hospital (that I thought was supposed to benefit a poor group), etc.– how is this giving back? Maybe she thinks parading around being “the Senator’s/President’s wife” while being black is giving back. To me it’s the ultimate hypocrisy feeding on the ultimate delusion.

Pissed off Hillary supporting “typical white” women (and Men) that they told to go to hell.
—(“Stay home then”–Love, Donna)
—(“We don’t need you!”—Love, DKos and mybarackobama spawns, most of whom people like us financially support at home)

Bitter hicks with guns and religion

Those damned old people

There’s one more residual problem. Michelle. Women hate her. She’s an arrogant, crude, snotty, meanspirited snob with no good reason to be one. She’s the classic example of how you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear, since we are onto Piggisms.

So that brings them back to the original warning given to them by Lannie:

“You can’t win an election with just eggheads and African Americans” (or children!)

The fact is, Sarah Palin is in Obama’s head, fucking up his remaining brain cells. He’s rattled. He tried everything a pig like him knows and it made things worse for himself. That’s because he’s a pig and doesn’t have a clue just exactly how pissed off we are. He isn’t even smart enough to realize that when he shoves Hillary in our faces, we get even more pissed off.

He thinks we are incidental and that is how he treated us while he preened and pranced, expecially since so many of us are women, who of course, would be incidental to a pig like him.

As I reconnoiter: Hillary broke his magic wand and now Sarah is about to drink his milkshake. Karma is a bitch, Barky. You have been foiled by your smarter typical white grandmother, so to speak. Again.

The bottom line for me is that she can believe whatever she wants personally, as long as it is not imposed on others.

Also, on the abortion issue – I don’t think anyone really wants back alley, coat hanger abortions again – it won’t happen!

I remember 9/11 all too well, one of the women I worked with husband worked in the Twin Towers. (I was living in NJ at the time). She was so hysterical that day we couldn’t let her leave, all we could do was hug her and try to keep her calm, and there was no way to find out if her husband was alive or dead. We learned he had survived but others they both knew didn’t. The loss of all those lives is not something that should be treated with any type of disrespect.

MCCAIN/PALIN 08
HILLARY 2012

I can assure that rank and file feminists were behind Hillary. While Obama received endorsements from some leading feminists such as Nancy Keenan, not many feminists followed her lead, including the president of the Illinois chapter of NOW who was a Clinton delegate. I think that there is a generational divide on candidate support. It seems to me that most of Obama’s women supporters are relatively young and have no clue as to the history and definition of feminism. They unquestioningly accept sexist, misogynistic, and ageist remarks and behavior. It is the “older” women and those younger women who grasp the importance of feminism who understand that gender-based attacks by a political candidate renders him unacceptable.

I think that Palin’s women supporters are intuitive feminists – that is, while they are not active in organizations that specifically promote women’s rights, they know that women should be judged upon the basis of their intelligence, character, and accomplishments and not upon superficial characteristics. It is this group that Obama is losing now.