<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play the Salary Game!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bemused</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752236</link>
		<dc:creator>bemused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752236</guid>
		<description>Sometimes these acts to provide &quot;fair play&quot; are too full of philosophical problems. What is fair? What is equal? There can be too many variables to consider: we have men vs. women, but we also have level of training and job content to compare. For instance, &quot;Staff Assistant&quot; is a popular title, but are all these staff assistants equal in workload and responsibility? Who gets to snoop in the workplace to make sure things are equal? What&#039;s to prevent someone gaming the system by giving some favored person a nicer title so their higher salary is justified? It&#039;s a terrible can of worms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes these acts to provide &#8220;fair play&#8221; are too full of philosophical problems. What is fair? What is equal? There can be too many variables to consider: we have men vs. women, but we also have level of training and job content to compare. For instance, &#8220;Staff Assistant&#8221; is a popular title, but are all these staff assistants equal in workload and responsibility? Who gets to snoop in the workplace to make sure things are equal? What&#8217;s to prevent someone gaming the system by giving some favored person a nicer title so their higher salary is justified? It&#8217;s a terrible can of worms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoBamaNoWay</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752185</link>
		<dc:creator>NoBamaNoWay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752185</guid>
		<description>truth is, democrats are nothing but talk.  it&#039;s like bill clinton said, it&#039;s all about delivering, and obama not going to deliver squat, except to Chicagify the rest of the country.  no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truth is, democrats are nothing but talk.  it&#8217;s like bill clinton said, it&#8217;s all about delivering, and obama not going to deliver squat, except to Chicagify the rest of the country.  no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocky whacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752061</link>
		<dc:creator>cocky whacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752061</guid>
		<description>She didn&#039;t know about being paid less until after the 180 days of the first act of discrimination.  As I understand it, the Court&#039;s interpretation was not what Congress intended.  In any case, the way the Court interpreted the statute makes it impossible to sue for discrimination.  Employers have very little to fear and I more likely to discriminate the way the Court interpreted the law.  What is the point of having a statute barring discrimination if there are no consequences for violating the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She didn&#8217;t know about being paid less until after the 180 days of the first act of discrimination.  As I understand it, the Court&#8217;s interpretation was not what Congress intended.  In any case, the way the Court interpreted the statute makes it impossible to sue for discrimination.  Employers have very little to fear and I more likely to discriminate the way the Court interpreted the law.  What is the point of having a statute barring discrimination if there are no consequences for violating the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocky whacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752035</link>
		<dc:creator>cocky whacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-752035</guid>
		<description>Without clarifying the statute of limitations, the act has no teeth.  This allows companies to get away with paying men more for the same job.  McCain has a chance to choose fair pay over corporate interests and he chose corporate interests.  How is the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act similar to &quot;Don&#039;t Ask, don&#039;t tell?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without clarifying the statute of limitations, the act has no teeth.  This allows companies to get away with paying men more for the same job.  McCain has a chance to choose fair pay over corporate interests and he chose corporate interests.  How is the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act similar to &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, don&#8217;t tell?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PamFlorida</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751744</link>
		<dc:creator>PamFlorida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751744</guid>
		<description>The first line of the ad got to me:
&quot;Today many women work to help support their families.&quot;
Today MOST women have to work because one salary is not enough to support a family. It&#039;s not a choice anymore.
Single women with children constitute over 75% of the poorest families in the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first line of the ad got to me:<br />
&#8220;Today many women work to help support their families.&#8221;<br />
Today MOST women have to work because one salary is not enough to support a family. It&#8217;s not a choice anymore.<br />
Single women with children constitute over 75% of the poorest families in the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuppence 411</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751477</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuppence 411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751477</guid>
		<description>Well I watched the news and read the newspapers at the time;  it was because it opened the door to retroactive lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I watched the news and read the newspapers at the time;  it was because it opened the door to retroactive lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuppence 411</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751460</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuppence 411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751460</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly, there was a provision which allowed retroactive lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, there was a provision which allowed retroactive lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladies, If You Didn’t Vote For Hillary…Why Are You Screaming About Your Rights Now? : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751411</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladies, If You Didn’t Vote For Hillary…Why Are You Screaming About Your Rights Now? : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751411</guid>
		<description>[...] the women to ‘get over it’ can convince me he gives a rosy red damn about my rights. No one who pays the women on his staff less than the men can convince me he gives a damn about equal pay and opportunity for women. And no man who behaves [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the women to ‘get over it’ can convince me he gives a rosy red damn about my rights. No one who pays the women on his staff less than the men can convince me he gives a damn about equal pay and opportunity for women. And no man who behaves [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jyotinc</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751354</link>
		<dc:creator>jyotinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751354</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the info. There is no doubt I didn&#039;t make a mistake of choosing him to be the president. Action speaks louder than words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the info. There is no doubt I didn&#8217;t make a mistake of choosing him to be the president. Action speaks louder than words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751351</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751351</guid>
		<description>He never practices what he preaches, but is great in fingerpointing... This is not leadership, this is childish.

Does he really think that people don&#039;t check out what he says and does? The more outrageous the lie, the easier to get away with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He never practices what he preaches, but is great in fingerpointing&#8230; This is not leadership, this is childish.</p>
<p>Does he really think that people don&#8217;t check out what he says and does? The more outrageous the lie, the easier to get away with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwrjr</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751325</link>
		<dc:creator>jwrjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751325</guid>
		<description>The only &quot;low information&quot; voters are the ones who vote for Obama.  The voters who go and find out about the issues (rather than being spoon-fed toxic nonsense) are the ones who will vote for anybody other than Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only &#8220;low information&#8221; voters are the ones who vote for Obama.  The voters who go and find out about the issues (rather than being spoon-fed toxic nonsense) are the ones who will vote for anybody other than Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HC</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751288</link>
		<dc:creator>HC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751288</guid>
		<description>In rejecting Ledbetter&#039;s appeal in Ledbetter v Goodyear, the Supreme Court said that &quot;she could have, and should have, sued&quot; when the pay decisions were made, instead of waiting beyond the 180-day statutory charging period. 

Not 90 days. Not forever. 6 months.

Here is the decision:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=ledbetter&amp;url=/supct/html/05-1074.ZS.html

The &quot;Ledbetter Fair Pay Act&quot; being batted around by congress seeks to increase the 6 months.

Here is the Act as it stood prior to rejection:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02831:

It doesn&#039;t say a thing about paying women less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In rejecting Ledbetter&#8217;s appeal in Ledbetter v Goodyear, the Supreme Court said that &#8220;she could have, and should have, sued&#8221; when the pay decisions were made, instead of waiting beyond the 180-day statutory charging period. </p>
<p>Not 90 days. Not forever. 6 months.</p>
<p>Here is the decision:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=ledbetter&#038;url=/supct/html/05-1074.ZS.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/search/display.html?terms=ledbetter&#038;url=/supct/html/05-1074.ZS.html</a></p>
<p>The &#8220;Ledbetter Fair Pay Act&#8221; being batted around by congress seeks to increase the 6 months.</p>
<p>Here is the Act as it stood prior to rejection:</p>
<p><a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02831" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02831</a>:</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t say a thing about paying women less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Brazile hating on coocoo wacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751286</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Brazile hating on coocoo wacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751286</guid>
		<description>Hey Coo coo,

Please ask BO why you don&#039;t make as much money as your more attractive counterparts! He&#039;s discriminating against you -- or are you to wacko to notice it?

Stop the hate, coo coo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Coo coo,</p>
<p>Please ask BO why you don&#8217;t make as much money as your more attractive counterparts! He&#8217;s discriminating against you &#8212; or are you to wacko to notice it?</p>
<p>Stop the hate, coo coo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocky whacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751275</link>
		<dc:creator>cocky whacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751275</guid>
		<description>How is that the major point?  I am more interested in the law than in the hiring practices of one person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that the major point?  I am more interested in the law than in the hiring practices of one person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocky whacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4841/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751245</link>
		<dc:creator>cocky whacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/19/play-the-salary-game/#comment-751245</guid>
		<description>No one explained why McCain is against the Lilly Ledbetter Act.  That was the point of his ad.  Do you agree with McCain on this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one explained why McCain is against the Lilly Ledbetter Act.  That was the point of his ad.  Do you agree with McCain on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

