RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

How The Trolls Win – Required Reading

Or.  Why they earn their $7/hour*.

Last night was a perfect example of the reasoning behind the Obama campaign hiring paid trolls.  It also demonstrates what happened on other blogs this year to drive away, or quiet the voices of reason.  I hope that every loyal No Quarter member will follow what I say, suck it up and make a conscious effort to keep No Quarter an Oasis in the desert of the Internet.

Last night I wrote about Sarah Palin and the Economist article The triumph of feminism. This post was about Palin, success and feminists who dismiss that success because they do not agree with her politics.   Upon waking this morning I had the blogger’s little thrill.  I saw that my post was compelling enough to engage people in 283 comments.  WhooHoo!.  But they were, for the most part, the wrong comments, or at least off topic comments and the reason is so simple.

A troll did her/his job and successfully changed the subject.

The Obama Internet team learned well from their mentor Karl Rove.  They learned that distraction, subject changing distraction works and they learned the art of doing it so that the ones being distracted rarely know it has happened.  How can they/we not know?  Because my friends we are the enablers.

We are too quick on our keyboards and cannot resist answering the call of a Troll.  And believe me, all they want, all they are paid for is to get one answer, one comeback to whatever they may have typed.

This is the same tactic the south side bully asked his canvassers and our neighbors to use.  “Get in their faces, argue with them”.  Essentially don’t give them(us) a chance to question The One™ as they shove him down our throats.   Here is Obama encouraging this behavior.

But I digress. Distraction.

That is the key word.

The job of our pet trolls is to distract us from our discourse.

Change the subject even if they become the subject.

Preferably change the subject like last night to an un-winnable discussion of like, dislike. Last night 283 comments were not about Sarah Palin, feminism, the Economist or anything resembling the questions raised in the post. 

One troll, Freedom Fighter, did as they so often do and got in the first comment, copied and pasted from a library of suggested crap.

And what then happened?

Someone makes Freedom Fighter’s night, probably gets him a bonus, and entered Troll Alert!

Freedom Fighter cracks his knuckles, has another swig of Corona and sits back to watch the fun.In fact, without looking at names or knowing I’d say there is a good possibility that the one making the alert was Freedom Fighter himself as what we call a sock puppet or an accomplice.

I apologize if I accuse anyone falsely but I’m trying to make a point.

Trolls live on attention.

Trolls thrive on taking the discussion from here to there.

Answering, acknowledging or in anyway mentioning the existence of the troll plays right into their game plan.

An old rule is Ignore them and they’ll go away.

Never Never Respond to them.

There is a great site that was written, I think, before the word Blog came into fashion.  http://www.flayme.com/troll/ where he helps recognize trolls and has a special intelligence test for Trolls; it will not work for normal human beings.

So, you’re maybe new to the web or blogs.  Good chance you are my 87 year old mom.  How do you avoid falling into their trap?  How can you not respond when someone says something 100% counter to all your beliefs and is just begging for a response?

It really is easy.  Places like No Quarter or even Obama’s site are echo chambers and we know it.  Bird’s of a feather flock together and we come here to converse with people of like mind.  It’s that easy.  If it looks like a troll, smells like a troll and tastes like a troll the odds are that it is a Troll.

When I see or smell a troll, no matter how horrible their comment, I IGNORE THEM.  I don’t write a comment for the admin to delete the troll comment.  I don’t answer the troll.  I don’t write Troll Alert.   I IGNORE THEM.   And I do say I get more pleasure from ignoring them than I ever have in answering them.  I like to think it’s like a serial killer who gets no press.  The murders aren’t written about and there are no press conferences.

Quiz.

1) Looks like a Troll?

_ Ignore It

_ Engage them in adult conversation hoping to help them see the light

2) Smells like a Troll?

_ Tell it’s mommy or site admin

_  Ignore It

3) Tastes like a Troll? (a trick question)

_ Spit it out

_ Ignore It

You can’t spit it out without first tasting and you should not ever taste.

The correct answers are, I know you guessed it – IGNORE THEM

* I wonder if the IRS has added a new job classification, 6969 – Internet Troll

My site actually allows trolls but has an ignore user button.  Stop in for a visit http://www.partizane.com

  • arabella trefoil

    Point made.

    • Denise

      Please hit back at Obama and all of his supporter’s on this age discrimination. Talk about insulting your community organizers and then Obama is insulting older people and my mom is feeling it everyday.

      My mother lost her job due to age and feels that she is discriminated against about age during interviews. This hurts her when she sees it happening at the highest level of office.

      She is so tired of hearing in the news that Obama is being discriminated against due to his race while Obama gets away with discriminating against McCain’s age by saying he’s too old and about to die and why should we elect him for the job of the Presidency? Do you know how this is affecting older citizens?

      Last time I checked you can’t discriminated against race, sex or age etc….
      Obama is discriminating against McCain and I hope that every older person gets out there and votes against Obama and his age discrimination.

      • http://N/A breeze

        Denise,

        I feel exactly like your mother. I bristle every
        time AGE is brought up by this inept, ignorant
        candidate!

        He makes me very angry, but I know the truth:

        I am 11 months younger than John McCain and I have
        NEVER felt as sharp and knowledgeable as I do now.
        He can’t string a sentence together without a
        prompter!

        As far as jobs go, I started noticing that in my
        early forties. Many a job for which I was inter viewed and was very qualified for often went to
        a much younger person. Both for a lower wage and
        for the “obvious” – part of sexism…..

        Tell mom to hang in there and not to lose heart.

        Hugs!

      • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

        Let him insult them. They will all vote for McCain. The largest reliable voting block in the country. Obama and his sycophants are their own worst enemy.

        Collectively, all of us he has insulted will be going to the polls en masse on November 4 and we will insult him right back in the most embarrassing way.

      • pcbedamned

        If McCain has one foot in the grave at 72, someone should tell my Granma that she is among the walking dead at 85!!! Good Lord, the woman still lives in her own apartment, drives a car so big even I wouldn’t attempt it, does her own banking, grocery shopping, well, you get the picture.
        Age is as age feels. Personally, I find it more offensive to see a 46 year old man trying to act like one of ‘the boyz’, than I do a 72 year old man of whom has some wisdom and life experience behind him.

    • Surelock Homes

      Hey, the good guys could use some assistance at the ABC blogs. Talk about infiltration. Sensible adults needed now!

      Http://www.abcnews.go.com

      Thanks for the help!

      • Shiloh

        You’ll never overcome the inherent bias at ABC. Better to just let it go.

        • tminu

          so true

      • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

        I don’t watch them and I don’t give them blog traffic. Just treat then like dead people. That’s what works the best. Pretend they aren’t there. They are the bottom of the ratings pile anyhow. Delete their link. They are their own choir.

        • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

          I don’t even watch their soaps anymore. Ever since the Charlie Gibson interview (hatchet job) with Sarah Palin I have not had abc on my tv one time – not once.

          Before, my daily ritual was abc from 1pm to 4pm.
          I’ve never watched Oprah – but “All my children”, “One life to live” and “General Hospital were all a must for me. If I couldn’t be home to watch it I had my recorder on. I was an addict.

          Now I often wonder what is happening in Pine Valley, Llandview and Port Charles, but I do not tune in. You’d be surprised how easy a habit is to break when a principle is involved.

          • Vicki

            LOL, answer back on here and I’ll send you my Christian historical romance novels, free (three of them). If you care for that sort of thing. You can read a preview here:

            http://www.writing.com/authors/vdavisson

            The author is right. Ignore trolls and they give up and shrivel away. Mommy didn’t give them the right kind of attention and they crave the same dysfunctional argumentation here.

    • Jess Terr

      Attention, Troll this: BlacksAgainstObama heckles NObama in Coral Gables, Florida TODAY. http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=178233
      Get some fresh diapers, trolls.

      • socalannie

        Wow. Those people were brave. They certainly achieved their purpose & threw Obama off his stride.

        I agree we should ignore the trolls. I know its hard sometimes.

        • dpvegas

          Good kids! Bless their hearts, got past his screening, probably because they’re AA. Heck, use it! ‘Specially since most the folks in his little foto place were predominently white.

    • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

      I read somewhere that this Rovian tactic of distraction is actually called “ugly frog” whereby you wave an ugly frog in front of your opponent’s face so that s/he reacts to the ugly frog rather than continue to make her/his point.

      You’re right, trolls must simply be ignored. But we also must be aware that there are some trolls who can also hijack a post by responding to other trolls, thereby creating an echo chamber for themselves.

  • HARP
    • vinnie

      good one.

    • csuzeq

      Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

    • beebop

      It is international talk like a Pirate Day!

  • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

    I don’t really care about the troll issue. I want to know what we are going to do to raise awareness about Obama’s interference in US troop withdrawals in Iraq.

    • Hill Dem 4 McPalin

      Direct marketing to military families is in order

      • vinnie

        that’s a great idea.

    • McHope

      The group vets for freedom has don several ads exposing Obama. Maybe they would be interested in the story.

      http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/contact/

      Mailing Address:

      Vets for Freedom
      1200 Eton Court, NW
      Suite 300
      Washington, DC 20007

      Phone: (202) 338-4070
      Fax: (202) 338-4076

      • fluffy bunny

        Donate to them…they do good work and send folks to congress. Just like Barry said, the VFF “get in their faces”

        Well, I’d guess they are a whole lot more polite than the Obamabots, but you get the point.

    • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

      BTW, please go to the NY Post story on this and BUZZ IT UP on Yahoo. Part of the problem is that the Obamabots get busy buzzing up anti-McCain/Palin stories and we’re not buzzing up the anti-Obama ones:

      http://www.nypost.com/seven/09172008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obama_objects_129453.htm?&page=0

      (Click on the BUZZ UP button on the right)

      • mimi

        i tried but its not working

        • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

          You have to login to a Yahoo account to buzz it up.

      • Jess Terr

        Another great tactic.
        make sure you have multiple yahoo accounts to buzz it up and Digg it.
        I love this:
        http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=178233

    • Denise

      If you believe Obama violated the Logan act go to this link. It’s so easy to voice your concern.

      http://www.rallycongress.com/americansentinel/1223/a-call-for-hearings-into-senator-barack-obamas-violation-of-the-logan-act/

      Note: use the “send for free” option.

      • MsSoAnd So

        Thanks for the link. I really enjoyed that because I live in IL and I got to send a letter to Nobama about his own actions! Who’s smirking now!

        • Carol

          Cool. I wonder how he will respond.

      • IndayHill

        Thanks, Deneise, for the info. We need to act NOW, because the MSM is siding with this irresponsible, unqualified presidential candidate BHO, & America needs us NOW!
        BHO has the cyber full of unpatriotic deceptive people and we can do send out for petition to put a stop to BHO deception. He is a PHONY!!
        Vote McCain/Palin ’08 !
        America deserves the BEST !
        NOOBAMA !

    • larryfan

      so right….why is the news ignoring this ??

      this is the worst thing an American can do….

    • Vicki

      I am going to volunteer for the Republicans here in California. If they have a strategy that they care to share, I will report back. If I’m allowed to, that is. I don’t want to give away anything that can help the enemy.

  • http://www.despair.com/changewinds.html Smilin’ Jim

    Any details on their medical and dental plan you wish to share?

  • georgiapeach

    Excellent point New Hampster. I wish blogs had an ignore function like the chat rooms that preceded them had.

  • benny

    Hmm…I’m guilty that way, NewHampster. I’ll try and do as you suggest. :-)

  • HC

    This site needs an ignore user button!

    • JB

      A point system like YouTube comments.

    • jwrjr

      Maybe something like a “troll” button (for registered users only) so that if somebody is legitimately marked “troll” a few times the blog would simply not print their comments.

      • bemused

        TL had a kindred system where people could rate comments 1 – 5, where 1 is troll and 5 – ? The trouble with this type of system is that then the trolls can also rate people one, rate the other trolls 5, and there goes the guesstimation troll scale because soon everyone is average. I’ve had similar experiences with other numerical ranked scales, and I would say they bring out yet another kind of troll.

        On the other hand, it seems like the posters are usually quick to identify trolls, so it would be good to use that input somehow. Maybe a probation period for new posters, so they are limited in number of comments? Or warnings for content violations that add up to a critical amount, followed by banning. There should be some slack and forgiveness to allow for non-troll posters to learn how to make themselves clear/recover from an unaccustomed meltdown or bad etiquette.

  • thenana2

    New,

    Thanks, agree with you 100&. Now is there any way to prove that they are paid by Obama?

  • Keep It Up

    Anyone see that press Obama conference today? He absolutely has no clue..

    • Eden

      For $28,500 you can order a key to his speeches, “Obama Math: Let’s Be Clear About This.”

      All pages are numbered “zero.”

  • politicsIsdirty

    I agree with Hillary or Bust.

    Obama’s interference in troop withdrawal has to be exposed further. If the MSM doesn’t do its job, we the people have to. We cannot rely anymore on the journalists, who have become member of the Obama media.

  • MaryPat

    So to revisit the subject of Sarah Palin and feminism…

    http://www.nysun.com/national/palin-pick-puts-many-women-on-the-verge/86241/

    • SFhillary

      I think that the initial surge of interest in Sarah Palin, and by extension the McCain candidacy, was probably to a significant degree based on feminist solidarity. McCain’s bump in the polls, which was significant, came both from exciting the base (which loves Palin’s evangelical roots) and from a lot of female independents.

      However, over the next couple weeks, as people figured out a) that Sarah Palin lied through her teeth in her first major address to the American public, and b) Sarah Palin can’t talk about substantive issues without sounding like a high schooler who just finished cramming for a final, she lost those votes. And today, in all major public opinion polls, she is the least liked and most disliked of the four candidates.

      To recap: her initial popularity was indeed a triumph of feminism. Her resulting unpopularity is a triumph of reason, which is not inconsistent with feminism. I myself, who absolutely love Barack Obama and loathe John McCain, got a kick out of seeing the public show Palin such a strong initial surge of support, just as I loved seeing Hillary make such a great run in the primary and would have been a strong supporters of hers if she’d won the primary.

      Fortunately for Obama, the Democrats, and the entire world, Sarah Palin is most decidedly not ready for prime time. At this point she’s a drag on the McCain ticket. But then again, so is McCain…lol…

      • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

        Where is your evidence that Palin is now suddenly more disliked? Any evening out in the polls right now is due to the Wall Street mess that McCain is getting unfairly blamed for. As stocks rebound (which they are now doing) and things calm down, McCain will most likely regain his momentum.

        • Ginger

          Ignore them.

        • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

          Well-played. Engage the troll in adult conversation. That usually shuts them up.

        • beebop

          That is one of the worst trolls EVAH! IGNORE …. useless. Head up its ass.

        • SFhillary

          I’m a troll? Really? I’ve been asking on this thread how exactly we define a troll. Does being an Obama supporter on NQ automatically make me a troll? Oh well, if so, then so be it.

          Anyway, here’s my answer on Palin: she, without question, has lost the support of a lot of Americans who gave her the benefit of the doubt for a week or so after her debut. This from 538, by FAR the best polling analyst site on the net today:

          “McCain’s other problem is that Sarah Palin may no longer be an asset to the ticket; in fact, she may be a liability. Averaging the candidates’ favorability scores across four recent polls — as one should always try and do when looking at favorability numbers since they can vary greatly depending on question wording — Palin now has the worst net scores among the four principals in the race:

          McCain’s other problem is that Sarah Palin may no longer be an asset to the ticket; in fact, she may be a liability. Averaging the candidates’ favorability scores across four recent polls — as one should always try and do when looking at favorability numbers since they can vary greatly depending on question wording — Palin now has the worst net scores among the four principals in the race:

          [ Well, it isn't letting me copy the image, but if you want to see the poll numbers for yourself, go here:

          http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/state-of-race-is-mccain-in-trouble.html

          ]

          Palin’s average favorability score is now a +7 — about 10 points behind Joe Biden’s numbers. Perhaps more importantly, these numbers are 10-15 points behind where Palin’s numbers were just a week or so ago. If voters come in not knowing very much about a candidate — and the more they see of the candidate, the less they like of the candidate — this is a major concern.”

          * * *

          This is a reality, PUMAs, not some Obana fan’s fantasy. The American public has pretty decisively rejected Sarah Palin as a potential commander in chief. She is popularity among the hardcore evangelical right, and I guess among PUMAs. That’s about it. The mainstream independent centrists do NOT like her, do NOT trust her, and probably will NOT vote, as a majority, for John McCain.

          • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

            Seriously, get help.

            • Carol

              SF is a Troll. Ignore.

          • Deep Truths

            Does being an Obama supporter on NQ automatically make me a troll?

            Well, duh! Buy a clue, prostitute yourself…oh nevermind. You’re are already doing that for HObama.

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        I’m an atheist feminist, and I love Sarah Palin! She’s gonna kick Biden’s ass during the debates—all with a lipstick smile and perfectly coiffed hair. She should flirt with him a bit to throw him off his macho game.

        • jazzfan

          Don,t count on it

      • CC Cane

        Ignore them.

    • vinnie

      I saw her on Hannity last night, the woman is the real deal. I’ve been getting the ‘boogey man creationist Palin’ emails from friends. She said in the interview last night that her parent(s) are teachers and one actually teaches science. They have always talked about evolution and the many different views on the subject and she respect all views. Try again bots.

      • Carolyn Mann

        You know, I always thought of my own mom as the quintessential feminist, though she would never have called herself that. She always worked outside the home, through necessity, and actually ran a dairy by herself for more than a year. She always did exactly as she pleased, despite what my dad thought about it. If she wanted to go visit my grandmother and my dad wouldn’t go with her, she jumped in the car and went — even when my grandmother lived several states away. She liked to hunt and fish (and was a very good shot) and often went on hunting trips with my dad. But at the same time, she belonged to a Pentecostal Church and would never have considered an abortion.

        In many ways Sarah Palin reminds me of my mom. And like my mom, Palin seems comfortable with her own beliefs without feeling the need to push them on others. I have to admit that I am quite taken with Palin and admire her greatly. She reminds me of many of the women in my family.

  • beverly leslie

    So true, that’s why the trolls try and post the first comment.

    Ignore the trolls.

  • leslie

    What an exercise in discipline this will be. I love it! (It’s kind of like ignoring the tantrum my 3 year-old pitched at the Christmas pageant in 1983.)

    • NewHampster

      Exactly! You win. ;-)

  • blog force one

    Good post! all should stay on point of the blog and redirect the comments as such . trolls are whining spoiled brats so by ignoring them is the worst punishment and they will continue to add more bait to the hook! don’t bite! IGNORE ,IGNORE ,IGNORE!

  • Jess Terr

    There is such palpable rage from decent Americans over the hijacking of our election, and the atmosphere is so poisoned, that decent Americans are afraid to speak out in the real world, so that blogs become the only outlet. Trolls, while they are too stupid to think for themselves, do what they are programmed to do which is post daily talking points at the top of all blog comment sections. And, the decent Americans vent. The only way to beat them is to play their game and ban them. Or prevent them from posting. I prefer the prevention of posting, because then they are left with the anger and decent Americans are free of their race bating, anger-mongering stupidity.

  • Mel in TX

    Has anyone seen all the wierd new polls on
    Real Clear Politics ?? Now that Barky’s percentages are down they are throwing in any poll that brings up his numbers – it is pretty pathetic and obvious.

    • blog force one

      i don’t trust the Marist poll at all i saw it too and was immediately suspicious as all of their poll results tilted obama Rasmussen I respect more

      • SFhillary

        You’re right. Rasmussen is one of the best, although he is a Republican and probably has some residual McCain bias. He has shown the big move to Obama over the last week just like everyone else, but he still has them as tied, while everyone else gives Obama a 4 or 5 point lead. The truth is probably in the middle: a 2 or 2.5 point Obama lead.

        Given the way the electoral map looks this year, a 2 point Obama lead in the final voting should easily be enough to win the election. McCain has to do something to change the dynamic again. Look for sleazy personal attacks on Obama’s patriotism! Maybe that will help!

        • csuzeq

          I have no doubt McCain will soon be telling all Obama’s deep dark secrets!

          • SFhillary

            In your dreams. My expectation is that if Obama had any deep, dark secrets to be revealed, Hillary Clinton would not have gone down to defeat without seeing to it that they were revealed, and McCain would not allow himself to be decisively trailing in the polls with 45 days to go without having someone reveal them. The closer you get to an election the harder it is to change a lot of people’s minds. The time to “define” Obama was in the weeks just prior to and after his convention, when lots of low-info voters were tuning in for the first time. McCain certainly did his best with the sleaze, but as I hoped and prayed it would, the negative onslaught just bit him in his own ass. Now Obama is still better liked than McCain, and McCain has lost his reputation as an honest, honorable politician.

            • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

              Or we could just do it the old-fashioned way. In that case, the majority of Americans will not support a sexist, corrupt, room temp IQ socialist with no plans, no experience, but a whole lot of scary friends. Americans will elect strong on national security John McCain and his exciting new Governor from Alaska.

            • http://! Clinton Fan

              HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

              You’re….FUNNY!!!!

              :lol:

              Stupid, but funny!

            • Deep Truths

              Oh there you go you trollop with your ‘low information voter’. When those low info voters get a load of what Obama is packing in his trunk, you will have wished they remained low info voter. Forty-five days is a life- time. Two-weeks is a long time in politics.

              I hope McCain is seething now and goes on a tear. The problems is ‘WHERE TO START’ when you’ve got so much. Its like putting a thesis together. The truth has to be laid out in a pattern that discernible but not overwhelming.

              Knowing the ‘Obama Pillow Fluffing Press’ will overlook any and everything the least bit negative towards Obama, paid advertisements has to be brought out. Its much too early for that. However, they should start soon though in order to lay the groundwork. Otherwise it will be a blizzard of information and people will wonder why this hasn’t been out before.

              Personally I think they’d been asked to hold back while Fitzgerald finishes his federal cases that will ensnare The One Crack Smoking Presidential Candidate in his own hubris. It will be a poetic ending to his fairytale existence.

        • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

          According to Karl Rove who appeared on Greta Van Sustren’s (GVS) show last night, he thinks that McCain is doing pretty well on the electoral map. He must win Ohio, though, and stay ahead in Florida. New Mexico and Colorado are also important states to win.

          On another note, did anyone hear the Donald Trump interview last night on the GVS show? He was pretty pissed off at the way HRC was treated during the primaries and at Obama’s snubbing of her for the VP spot. I wish Trump had said on air to Obama, “YOU’RE FIRED!”

          • SFhillary

            This is more or less accurate; if McCain wins OH, NM, FL and CO, he will probably win the election. Go to fivethirtyeight.com, though, and surf down the right hand column to the aggregated state polling. You can see there what all the most recent results are for any state, polls from conservatives, liberals and indies alike. Here’s what they tell us:

            OH: Toss-up. Obama might now be edging into a lead.
            NM: Obama moving into a big lead. This is huge: this is a Bush -’04 takeaway.
            FL: Getting very close, but you have to assume a McCain victory here unless Obama moves into a clear lead, which is possible but in my opinion not likely.
            CO: Very close, Obama might be edging into a lead here too; another possible Bush ’04 pickup.

            Bottom line? McCain is slipping. Obama is leading. And the debates are coming.

            • SFhillary

              Actually, in the interest of accuracy: I was wrong, Florida is not yet getting very close. Until proven otherwise by more Obama growth, it’s a McCain state, period. But it was a Bush ’04 state; Obama doesn’t need FL to win.

              • SFhillary

                One last thought: check out Virginia. That’s another Bush ’04 state that, if it flips, hands the election to Obama. Obama has now been leading in the last two polls in VA. And he’s neck and neck in Ohio. If Obama holds the Kerry ’04 states (which he probably wil), and wins Virginia OR Ohio OR Iowa/New Mexico/Colorado, he wins the election.

                • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

                  Are you done chasing your tail yet?

                • Tamarah

                  Well, I guess that is why the Dhimmicrats in Virginia are signing up 15 year olds, senile residents of nursing homes and kids in high schools.

                  Gotta love the creativity of desperate Chicago politico types. Wait another week or two. I am SURE they will try to create more BS topics that will be personal attacks on McCain/Palin rather than actually talking about ISSUES that affect our country.

          • Jules

            He kind of did now. I heard him endorse John McCain on tv this morning.

          • Carol

            Yes I saw The Donald. He said he has known John McCain a long time and that he likes him, he respects him, he think he is a smart guy and also said he is going to be a great president.

            He also had praise for Sarah Palin The Donald thinks she’s made a tremendous impact especially on rejuvenating the Republican Party.

      • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

        The polls will keep the election seemingly close as they do every year. If it looks like Obama is ahead, it will cause panic among the base. If he’s too far behind, the base isn’t motivated to show up and vote. Republicans always lie to pollsters, but there are internal polls that inform the campaigns beyond the MSM echo chamber results. If McCain is tied in Iowa and campaigning there and gaining in Colorado and Pennsylvania, he’s doing well.

        • CommenSenseIsInShortSupply

          I almost ALWAYS avoid using the word “always”, since it is almost ALWAYS incorrect to do so. ;)

          • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

            Well, la di fucking da.

            • beebop

              hahahahhahahha … I love it! Let’s stay with our outrage. I think that it works well.

        • SFhillary

          Uh yeah, but unfortunately, McCain isn’t tied in Iowa. He’s being crushed in Iowa. Obama will win Iowa by 10 points. That’s one of the Bush ’04 states that we’re going to take back, for sure.

          Pennsylvania: dream on. Of the last 20 polls taken in PA over the past few weeks, McCain has led in precisely one: the Zogby Interactive Poll, which is a notoriously innaccurate marker. Obama has led by at least a few points in every other poll taken there, and his numbers are growing. He will win PA. He has to win PA; that was a Kerry state; Obama can’t lose any Kerry states, realistically, and win the election.

          Colorado is a different story. Colorado is very close, but I’ve seen a couple polls in the past few days that have Obama breaking into a real lead there. If I were a McCain supporter and I saw Obama moving ahead in CO, I would absolutely panic and start drinking heavily, because if Obama wins Colorado, GAME OVER.

          • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

            Well, you’re already drinking koolaid heavily, so we’ll just regard your posts with amusement.

      • Carolyn Mann

        I don’t really trust the Marist poll either and prefer the Rasmussen polls. But I think all of the polls may, in the end, prove to be wrong. During the primaries, Obama almost always polled 5 to 6 points higher in the pre-election and exit polls than the vote actually turned out to be. (That Bradley effect and all.) As long as McCain can stay even with Obama in the polls, I think he’ll probably win the election.

        • SFhillary

          Well, yes and no. On the ‘yes’ side: if McCain and Obama are tied in national tracking polls going into Election Day, I personally will be very upset, because that will mean McCain has a great chance to win the election. But I doubt they will be.

          On the ‘no’ side, you need to remember that what really matters is the electoral college map, and even with a national tie, the electoral map looks good for Obama. What we really need to be looking at are the swing states that will decide the election. If Obama and McCain are tied in states like OH, FL, PA, CO, MI, NM, etc. going into Election Day, I will be very nervous. It sure isn’t looking like they’ll be tied, though.

    • http://lesstalkmoreactivism.blogspot.com/ whoframedrudy

      The ‘Bradley Bump’

      You have to calculate a ‘Bradley Bump’ into Obama’s poll numbers after Sebelius and the other minions went on that ‘race card rampage’ last week. Tweaking the ‘Bradley Effect’ may be a strategy to give Obama some artificial numbers by deliberatey intimidating voters to lie to pollsters.

      Note that the ‘Bradley Effect’ doesn’t mean voters are racist. It just means voters don’t tell a pollster Obama is an unqualified phoney because the pollster will call them a racist. Like Chris Matthews did after New Hampshire.

      • Newly Independent

        Good point!

        There are many registered voters who will vote for McCain on Election Day. Yet they’re telling pollsters that they support Obama out of fear of being harrassed, intimidated and being called “racist.”

  • Leisa

    Yes, NH, your article was hijacked by troll comments. They certainly are tempting little buggers.

  • doc99

    Sandra Bernhardt warns Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some of Sandra’s big black brothers.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/09/19/sandra-bernhard-palin-would-be-gang-raped-blacks-manhattan

    Change you can believe in.

    • benny

      Hmm….this is getting worse and worse. sad….

    • Jackarooty

      Oh I think she has a big old lesbo crush on Sarah. Btw, has Bernhard done anything lately? This is an old and well worn publicity stunt right out of the handbook. Any publicity is good publicity.

      She’s the female version of Andy Dick!

      She is also incredibly FUGLY!!!

      • Jules

        ‘Incredibly’ is an understatement.

    • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

      Somehow, I doubt a mother of five who can field dress a moose is worried about Sandra’s homothugs.

      • Maverick

        Sarah is a sharp shooter.

    • mimi

      These women make me so ashamed.

      How in the hell do liberal democratic feminists expect to be taken seriously after the way they have viciously attacked Gov Sarah Palin? These are the worst kind of sexist remarks and coming from a woman no less.

      Okay, I get it. There are serious ideological differences between liberal feminists and Palin. Then attack her on the issues for God’s sake. But carrying on like a bunch of petty, silly, vindictive ‘bitches’ is not the way to get this across. No woman should be caught dead making off-handed, violent, offensive remarks encouraging gang rape or rape of any kind. This is playing into hands of misogynists. Doesn’t Berhard have a daughter? Does she really think gang rapists are going to stop and ask her daughter her political views before they violate her?

      I used to have respect for a lot of these women, but I’ve lost it. They represent everything in a woman that I want no part of. Mindless and sorely lacking in critical thinking.

      If they don’t get that their approach to fighting Palin is wrong then they missed the point of their own Movement.

      Sad, sad, sad day. And that 0bama brings this out in people, is not a good sign.

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        These Pod Feminists—i.e. “feminists” who enable patriarchy—can also be referred to as Brown Shirt Feminists.

        • yttik

          Wankerettes works for me.

  • samb

    I saw this last night and knew instantly,what was going on they (TROLLS) are very obvious and many of your loyal viewers and comment givers of your blog were there to identify them. Obama is the Troll King trying to control are Ideas. Thank You Larry for your website.

  • lark

    Obama at the University of Miami campus in Coral Gables speaking on women issues. Most of the audience were women.

    He could not have been more condescending to women than what he was. At least I don’t see how.

    The problem is that students at the UM are not dumb. I think he lost quite a few votes just from being condescending. That unless women at the UM like to be talked down too.

    • Ani

      Lark — is there a link to this or a transcript anywhere?

      Thanks.

      • lark

        I don’t know of a link except to send you to C-Span.org. The speech was carried by them.

  • SFhillary

    Yeah, yeah, I suppose because I support Obama I automatically qualify as a troll, too?

    • pm317

      OK, I will respond to your post above where you say it is the triumph of reason now, now that the Palin bump is receding. I don’t think so at all. The excitement is still there and conversions have happened and the system has reached a steady state. I am a feminist and a staunch liberal and I welcome Palin with all my heart. We have to have female candidates of all stripes to reach a critical mass so that things are no longer gender specific. In a democracy, if she has a following and the votes she will survive. You don’t have to vote for her if you don’t like her policies but where you give a male Republican candidate a pass, you’re trying to stifle her chances because she is a woman and because you think she is wrong for your kind of feminism. Your position is all the more weak if you also did not support Clinton. Then you have the stupidity to reject a well qualified candidate on flimsy reasons and then come back cry foul on this other woman. I think Palin is good for democracy and McCain has done a wonderful job shattering all kinds of myth in presenting her, a mother of 5 with ambition, confidence, and raw political instincts matching any male candidate there is. What did your candidate do in comparison? {I am not holding my breath to read your response to that question.}

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        PM317—You’re statement is the bottom line for me—i.e. that “Palin is good for democracy”!

        • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

          Correction: I meant “YOUR”, not “you’re”!

          PM317—Your statement is the bottom line for me—i.e. that “Palin is good for democracy”!

    • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

      You know you’re a troll, and you even get off on the attention. Nobody likes you here.

      • Steven Mather

        HF,

        I’ve had good discussions with sfhillary. sfh is not a troll.

        Periodically, when sfhillary is feeling down, he lashes out, as a way of making himself feel better… and something that seems like trollism occurs, like anti-trollism comes out of me.

        SM

        • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

          Well, you’ve had a different experience from me. I always noticed SFH has a tendency toward hit-and-run behavior and will engage the person who is most outraged and reacts emotionally.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Yes, you’re one of our best-known trolls. A real “point and laugh” character.

      Persistent little fucker, too! Mindless, and repetitive, as well!

      Paid, or afraid, or both.

      Truth is truth. You asked, you got.

    • Deep Truths

      Seriously, why are you here?

      You are not going? to convert anyone. Do you have a need to be the center of attention? You take after your Great Leader in that respect.

      Go away.

  • JP

    Got it. Thank you for this timely reminder. I am guilty of engaging with the trolls, but no more. I will behave from now on. And please if I waver, help me out. Sometimes it is just too tempting… but always oh so pointless.

    Again, thanks for the reminder.

    • http://undercoverblackman.blogspot.com Undercover Black Man

      JP… I’m your huckleberry. ;^)

      Seriously, though, might I say a word on behalf of so-called “trolls”? (I’d rather call us “dissenting voices,” as Larry Johnson did when he explicitly welcomed us.)

      I think the give-and-take and the exchange of information between Obama-haters and Obama supporters is what makes the comments section of this blog rock and roll with so much soul. Would No Quarter’s forums be as lively if it was 100 percent “dittoheads”?

      In your heart, you know I’m right about this.

      • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

        You’re wrong. If it weren’t for the Obama campaign’s COINTELPRO, we’d have lively debates amongst ourselves, not defending ourselves against accusations of racism, name-calling, insults, mean and condescending comments, sexist slurs and garden variety profanity.

        • Dawnelle

          I hear ya!

          Flush twice for SURE!!!!

        • http://undercoverblackman.blogspot.com Undercover Black Man

          Lively debates amongst yourselves? How would those go, Hope?

          “Obama is a thug!”

          “I’m with you!”

          “He stole the nomination from Hillary!”

          “Excellent point!”

          • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

            No, we would have been spared endlessly repeating the exclusion of Michigan and Florida, the uneven application of RBC rule 11a, caucus fraud and the shocking decision about Michigan delegates. We could have skipped Democrat For a Day and the nonsense about Operation Chaos. Every time a troll disrupts a thread, it is not to add to the conversation or provoke thought but tie up the thread by flaming and spamming.

            • Newly Independent

              We could have skipped Democrat For a Day

              I’m going to be a Republican For A Day! On November 4th!

              That would be a wonderful campaign for us PUMAs and my NoQuarter brothers and sisters to run! From now all the way up to Election Day!

              Thanks for the good idea Obama!

          • Postmaster

            trolls are idiots

            DITTO

      • Mr. Natural

        I think the give-and-take and the exchange of information between Obama-haters and Obama supporters is what makes the comments section of this blog rock and roll with so much soul.

        In your heart, you know I’m right about this.

        We don’t think with our hearts.

        We think with our heads.

    • beebop

      I always thought it was okay if we answered each other when they say something totally stupid. Can someone let me know please if that is okay … I think that it cleans the shit out of the arguments without deigning to respond directly, but if that isn’t acceptable, I’ll certainly stop.

    • Vicki

      Same here. Stay on topic and support each other. I know if I post a remark and no one answers, it’s deflating, but I’m a grownup and it’s no big deal. Imagine if it were my only hobby!

  • doc99

    Sandra Bernhardt warns Sarah Palin not to come into Manhattan lest she get gang-raped by some of Sandra’s big black brothers.

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/09/19/sandra-bernhard-palin-would-be-gang-raped-blacks-manhattan

    Change you can believe in.

    • beebop

      Maybe they can start putting the cages to use out in Denver? She seems like a good potential occupant.

  • arabella trefoil

    It’s going to hurt me a lot to ignore JM08. A lot.

    But is he a troll? I’m not sure.

    • Leisa

      I thought he was chicken little…

    • benny

      JM08 is what you call a sophistictaed troll. Good payscale. but from what I’ve seen, its definitely an Obama troll. Excellent acting by JM08. but in the end, just a troll.

      • arabella trefoil

        benny – Yes, yes, yes. At least we’re getting the upscale trolls.

        JM08 is a troll.

        • SFhillary

          But how do you define trolls? Is anyone who supports Obama on NQ a troll? Or do you have to be pretending to be something you aren’t to be a troll? I always thought it was the latter, but I get called a troll here all the time, and I’m not pretending to be anyone but myself.

          • they shoe horses don’t they

            sfhillary,you are the most condesending boring troll of all. You constantly overpost. If I could spell it, I would call you supercilious. And, no, you are not a troll automatically because you support Obama. But every time you post, I am reminded of those pictures of Obama looking down his nose at us. This is the last time I will address you.

    • Astra14

      I haven’t decided if JM08 is a troll or just extremely depressed!

      • arabella trefoil

        He’s a troll. I think he must be an unemployed actor.

        • Astra14

          LOL

    • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

      JM08 is a McCain supporter. He always has been, and he is clear about that. I’ve never seen him stir up any trouble except when he criticizes Hillary – and there is a difference between criticism and attacking.

  • schmog

    Obama 101

    A couple of years ago, I ran into that golden rule again. At a meeting with Senator Hillary Clinton in Washington, I asked what she thought of the Bush administration’s negotiations with the Iraqis concerning security cooperation. She said she would not second-guess the president and would wait for the outcome of the negotiations. In a statesmanlike manner, Senator Clinton reminded me of the golden rule—one that is common to all mature democracies where the opposition is loyal and constitutional.

    Today, Senator Obama is the leader of a loyal opposition in the United States, not the chief of an insurrection or a revolutionary uprising. What we are witnessing in the U.S. is an election, not an insurrection or a coronation, even less a regime change.

    Obama should not have discussed the government-to-government negotiations with the Iraqis. That he did, surprised the Iraqis no end. Raising the issue with them, especially the way he did, meant that he was telling them that he did not trust his own government.

    • schmog

      It is Obama whom we shouldn’t trust.

    • JoseyJ

      Shocking!
      WaPo editorial exposes Obama’s LIES about McCain!

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/18/AR2008091803159.html

      • lark

        Expose them but don’t call them lies nor do they say that Obama has been “unfair.”

      • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

        They must have noticed a drop in their readership. It used to be Politico and WaPo were where Beltway gossip was leaked. Now it’s just rumor-mongering and outright lies with heavy bias.

  • Jean

    This is my first posting and I wanted to say I really enjoy reading the posts on this site because I know I’m not alone in my distrust for Obama.
    Thanks for the insight on the trolls, hopefully no one will fall for their trap again.

    • Country First

      Welcome, Jean, and bring along some friends to read with you. I know just how you feel about finding this site – I think it’s the best on the web for information and providing a community of individuals who don’t like the taste of cult koolaid.

    • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

      I know what you mean, Jean. I lurked here for several months before I got up the nerve to post, and now when I have something to say I just jump right in. You’re right about being glad to have someplace where you can express your distrust of Obama and know that there are others who feel the same way. It sure beats biting your nails or grinding your teeth. Both of which I did a lot of before I got the nerve to post.

  • Paul3triple

    polls schmolls. You should just stop looking at polls period. No matter who is up. For one, a national poll is irrelevant. Popular vote is useless. It is the electoral college that counts/
    and statewide polls are always of less than 1000 poeple which i just find hard to be representative of the state.
    Forget the polls altogether. They decide nothing and alot of folks on this site let the polls get in their heads.

    • arabella trefoil

      Thanks for the reminder, Paul3triple. Election season is upon us, and everybody turns into an analyst!

    • bethtopaz

      Thanks for this comment.
      I woke up this morning feeling sick to my stomach that BO was up in the polls.
      I just can’t figure out, for the life of me, why any freedom-loving American would even consider voting for him.

      • SFhillary

        Well, I’m a freedom-loving American, and that’s exactly why I’ll be voting for Obama: because I have watched right-wing Republicans govern this country for the past eight years and do not believe our beautiful, wonderful nation and Constitution can survive another round of disastrous Republican mismanagement. I don’t think Obama is a God or anything — I loathe his compromise on FISA, I think his latest ads are sleazy and a mistake, and I’ve found some of his policy statements to be bland and wishy-washy and lame. But I think he’s smart and gifted and responsible and really cares about this country, and I am 100% certain that he will govern as a mature, mainstream Democrat, which is EXACTLY what America needs. We do NOT need another four years of evangelically based, reckless warmongering and tax-cutting that drives our economy into a ditch, which is exactly what we will get with McCain. And don’t even get me started on Palin. I, personally, without studying, off the top of my head, could stand before the American people and talk a much better foreign policy game than Sarah Palin. The idea of Palin as commander in chief is ludicrous, and I think, honestly, that his choice of her as his Veep was probably what lost this election for John McCain.

        As for the polls: they are relevant. They can change, a lot, but the closer we get to the election, statistically speaking, the more relevance the polls actually do have. So yes, you should be feeling sick to your stomach if you’re a PUMA, because Obama really is winning this election now, and time is running out for McCain to retake the lead.

        • Dawnelle

          lmao!

          damn that koolaide is strong!!

          neva neva land you live

          (do your homework will ya? or go to class)

          ur hysterical (must be after effects of too much of that obamist)

          • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

            When the Koolaid Man busted into SFHillary’s living room, he ran her down and knocked her on the head then dosed her with acid.

            • Dawnelle

              acid? that’s a bit harsh isn’t it?

              I just think he’s B ONKERS!

            • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

              If my friend told me they saw dead people, I’d check to see what color their tongue is and take them to the hospital before they tried to fly off the roof.

        • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

          neo-liberal fascist Obama = neo-con fascist GWB.

          A fascist is a fascist no matter what Party s/he is from: If it walks like a fascist duck . . . .

        • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

          To SFHillary: A famous president once said “the only polls that count are the ones taken in the voting booth on election day”.

          You may not be old enough to remember this, but a famous New York newspaper printed their overnight edition on election day to say “DEWEY WINS” – Tom Dewey of New York was running against Harry S. Truman of Missouri. The polls had all counted Truman out.
          SURPRISE – When the votes were all counted Truman had won by a landslide.

          SO MUCH FOR BRAGGARTS AND THEIR POLLS.

        • Maverick

          Did an obot steal SFhillary’s name? I sure seems so.

        • Carol

          You are really starting to get me P(*S$^. Obama goes to Europe and starts bashing America? That is not a very smart man. That is a man who is trying to tear our Country apart before the eyes of Europe. That is just not done. No matter how we may feel about Bush, no one can go over there and bash our President. That is UnAmerican.

          He tries to interfere in the Iraq strategy and asks they hold off on troop reduction until after the Bush Admin. is out of office. Violation of the Logan Act baby.

          Voting FOR infanticide. Voting Present in the Illinois Senate so he can escape any condemnation for what he voted on? Being against FISA before being for it?

          Telling his minions to “get in our face?”

          Being friends with the likes of Ayers, Wright, etc., who all hate America. Ayers wished he had done more bombings. He is lying when he says that Ayers was just an acquaintance. He is lying when he sayings he never heard Wright say those despicable things. You heard me right – He is a lyer.

          And, don’t give me that “Roe v. Wade” crap. It won’t happen.

          Oh, did I tell you I am one of those Bitter small town people, who owns guns, and I do pray daily. And, yes, I am a Democrat who voted for Hillary because she is the only one who was running on the Democrat Ticket that had intelligence and worked for us little people. Obama, what the F(*#@ did he ever work on. His one claim to fame, the Community Organizer, was a dud.

          Constitutional Lawyer. Give me a break, he doesn’t know what the Constitution says. Do you ever listen to what he says? Because if you have you would know that he frames his words so that you hear one thing, but he means something entirely different. Give me a break, he is a fairy tale.

          • KathyNeocon

            Well said Carol!! (applause applause)

          • Carol

            Oops, I should have done a readover to check my spelling. Forgive me for misspelling liar.

  • paddyJ

    I’m with you.

    Focus.

    When they “get in your face” it just gives a real close look at them. Laugh.

  • Paul3triple

    mccain palin rally beggining go check it out at democratvotingrepublican.com!

  • MoniQue

    Even DONALD TRUMP knows MCCAIN HAS THE BETTER ANSWERS FOR OUR ECONOMY!

    McCain-Palin 2008!

  • anonymous

    Guys I hope you don’t think I am a “concern troll,” but I am extremely worried with the recent econ crisis and the polls coming out today. McCain has to win at least MI or PA. I don’t know I just feel Repubs need to fire their missiles NOW. The idea of arrogant Obama as President frightens me so much. I can’t imagine the coverage of him if he wins – it will be four or eight years of hell. He has to be stopped now BEFORE he gets into power cause if he is such a thug now he will turn the American governmnt into a mafia state.

    • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

      Did you watch McCain today?

      • Leisa

        This sounds like JM08…

    • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

      There are a few different scenarios of how McCain could win, but the map is the same as always. McCain’s campaign knows what they’re doing. I noticed the SEC chair admitted McCain was right and short-selling stocks is a real problem. He says he will step down toward the end of this administration and feels bad that the situation got so chaotic. Obama “mocked” the McCain call for Cox’s job. One has solutions. The other makes fun of him. McCain is a natural leader.

    • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

      Anonymous – your name should be “CASSANDRA”

      You know, from Shakespeare.

      • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

        McCain/Palin 2008

  • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

    Another topic that needs to be covered is how TIME is playing the race card for Obama….Rush went after Obama for his ad and we need to point out why they are trying to cover up what is in the ad by calling it racist.

    http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/09/mccain_plays_the_race_card.html

    here is a link to memeorandum so you can see who is covering the piece.
    http://www.memeorandum.com/

    This sh!t has top stop.

    • Gal from Tex

      yeah Time also said, with regards to the “white woman vote”:

      Part of it is that many maxed-out moms are older than Obama, which makes them more skeptical that he has the experience he needs to do the job. Many are more culturally conservative than he is, and they are more likely than their younger sisters to be what Democratic pollster Celinda Lake delicately describes as “racially sensitive”.

      http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1842107,00.html

      So it doesn’t surprise me one bit that they like to pull out that race card when it suits them.

    • Carolyn Mann

      OK, as usual I’m left scratching my head as to where they see the racism. They see “two sinister-looking black men.” I see Obama and Raines, both nice looking men in business attire. It seems to me that there’s racism and fearmongering here, all right, but it’s not coming from the McCain camp.

  • pasmalltowngirl

    Off subject. Did anyone see Greta on Fox last night call Heather Mallick a “pig”. I think Greta spoke for millions of us.

    Mallick called Palin supporters “white trash” and compared Palin to a “porn actress”

    http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=3100036&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/index.html

    • wodiej

      oh yes! I saw that, in fact Greta called her a pig twice! Ha, I was cheering Greta on. And she just said it so calmly…it was great!!

    • Leisa

      WOW… did you hear what David W said at the end of that interview?

      Canada’s government funds (therefor controls) some of the media and conservative journalists are often called in to the Human Rights Commission and the Press Council for discussing Islam or same sex marriage… whereas liberal reporters get away with that trash.

      He was also honest about anti-Americanism in Canada…

      Greta seemed to miss that.

      • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

        Yeah, they ban books in liberal Canada, not in Wasilla, AK.

      • Kal

        Puh-lease. DW massively overstated what happens in Canada re hate speech. Massively. You would need a dose of koolaid to believe that claim too.

        • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

          They banned Mark Steyn.

      • Patrick Walker

        Canada’s government funds (therefor controls) some of the media and conservative journalists are often called in to the Human Rights Commission and the Press Council for discussing Islam or same sex marriage… whereas liberal reporters get away with that trash.

        The only instance I’ve heard of a “right-wing” publication was a single (now bankrupt) periodicial that decided to reprint those inflammatory Danish Muhammed cartoons. This periodical from Alberta has had a history and skirted decency a few times before … which is one of the reasons they no longer exist. I didn’t agree with them being brought before the HR tribunal only because it was a case of “too little, too late.”

        He was also honest about anti-Americanism in Canada…

        Greta seemed to miss that.

        Think its bad now, wait until the Canadian dollar hits $1.75 against the US dollar.

    • DAB

      Gee, I must be part of that White Trash sub-demographic who have a higher education, love arugula and watch PBS. I guess that Mallick includes the Baroness Lady Rothchild as well. I truly believe that Palin supporters cut across all demograhics.

      That comment is PURE HOGWASH — a perfect slogan for such a despicable PIG! Good for Greta for calling it like it is.

      • Dawnelle

        2 yrs of college here (puts me somewhere between trash and arugula I guess, and I don’t like it, lol)

        Pro-Reform
        pro-choice
        pro-gun
        pro-stem cell
        pro-environment
        PRO-America
        Veteran
        Mother
        Disabled

        love snow machines
        hate nascar
        love big dogs
        love all cats
        don’t like ankle biters
        have never tried moose – but willing

        ;-)

        PUMA4Palin

        • TeakwoodKite

          hate nascar???

          Nothing like it, Dawnelle. TGIF :)

        • Tamarah

          I think John is a genius and I love Sarah.
          Add me too.
          Except…..

          I’m a Jew, too.

          So please make my moose burger “kosher”, please

      • Carolyn Mann

        Count me in the same subdemographic, DAB, though must confess that I can’t stand arugula.

      • Carolyn Mann

        Count me in the same subdemographic, DAB, though must confess that I can’t stand arugula. I find it way too bitter and not clinging to the dressing enough.

        • Carolyn Mann

          Oops. Sorry for the double post. Not sure how I managed to hit the add button before I was finished. But obviously my efforts to stop it from posting weren’t successful.

  • http://! Clinton Fan

    Freedom Fighter cracks his knuckles, has another swig of Corona and sits back to watch the fun…

    No, he doesn’t. He opens another Hot Pocket, and types furiously away in order to earn enough money to buy a little pot and some pizza.

    I look at trolling differently–the more we see them, the MORE WORRIED the Kool Aid Kids are. The presence of trolls is directly related to the failure of Obama to connect to the majority of the voting public that he needs to gain victory.

    If they were winning, they would not be here.

    Keep that in mind, too.

    • schmog

      Freedom Fighter isn’t old enought to drink beer.

      • jwrjr

        It (FF) opens a bag of Cheetos and a Jolt cola.

    • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

      Clinton Fan, you are so right! Whenever they are in a panic they strike.

  • Perry Logan

    I don’t mind the trolls at NQ as much as the extreme right wingers.

    The trolls mostly call us names and bait us, which, when you get down to it, is fairly harmless.

    But NQ’s far-right contingent is another matter. These people freely call liberals and Democrats traitors and repeat all sorts of hoary old winger talking points about the left that were refuted centuries ago. In my opinion, this is far more disruptive than anything the trolls have ever done.

    Let’s face it, right-wingers screw up everything they touch.

    Dissing Democrats in a global way—calling them loonies, etc.—at a PUMA site is rude and destructive, given the fact that PUMA is a Democratic site. It’s like shwoing up at a party and peeing in the punch bowl.

    Never mind the trolls! If you think all Democrats and all liberals are for the birds, either button your lip about it or go off to some winger site. And I say that with love. ;-)

    • SFhillary

      I find this to be an odd comment. I think a lot of PUMAs, or if you would prefer, a lot of NQ users, really are Republicans who hate Democrats and liberals. I don’t see how it could be otherwise; I read too many comments here about “liberals” and “socialists” and “black liberation theology” all the other usual right-wing code words. These can’t all be from Democrats who just happen to dislike Obama.

      • WildChild

        I’m a liberal. Socialism has it’s place. Black liberation theology is alien to me.

        • https://secure.johnmccain.com/Contribute/Contributef.aspx?guid=aa60f933-6b64-449a-80af-0a52994863dd Linda

          ts ts, SFHillary is another troll, don’t bother. Could be ff with another blog name, they make them faster than a cow farts.

          Notice, changing the subject to the bloggers and the normal Obamabot argument, if you’re not for Obama, you must be a racist or a Republican.

          No Quarter ROCKS!

          …it’s hard for kool aid drinkers to understand most of us are the base of the OLD Democratic party (not the new urban Demagogic party)and they are drunk for an imposter. lol

          Isn’t it sad. Obama’s supporters are like him. They do anything for a buck.

        • Carolyn Mann

          Black Liberation Theology was alien to me, too, WildChild. (To be honest, most religions are alien to me since I am not a believer.) So I started doing some research on it. The following quote comes from a Paula Abeles post on Real Democrats called “Welcome to Denver.” She is actually quoting a Wall Street Journal article here:

          “In fact, anyone who has read James Cone’s [the father of BLT] texts knows that [Leah] Daughtry’s statement that ‘…all colors are clinging there’ is a complete mischaracterization of the fundamental underlying principles of Black Liberation Theology. Far from being a message of inclusiveness and love—it is a divisive message of acrimony and hate. Here’s an excerpt from the Wall Street Journal piece ‘Obama and His White Grandmother’ by James Taranto:
          ‘Here again is Cone’s description of black liberation theology: “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then
          he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community …. Black theology will accept only the love of God, which participates in the destruction of the
          white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”‘”

          (Leah Daughtry, by the way, is Howard Dean’s chief of staff at the DNC and was also chairwoman of the Democratic National Convention Committee. Additionally, she is a minister who preaches black liberation theology.)

          I’m still quite puzzled by the black theology thing, but am pretty sure those espousing it are not working in my best interest. Since Obama found fit to sit in Rev. Wright’s pews for 20 years listening to this crap, I’m also pretty sure he’s not going to be working in my best interest, either.

      • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

        Perry Logan is odd. At least they made him quit posting his insane video.

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        We PUMAS object to fascism—period. The Pod Dems have decided that they will out do the neo-con fascists this time around. PUMAS believe in country over Party.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        Say….I think you’re full of shit! I’ve been a registered D for almost forty years. The “liberal” remarks are rare and from people–like YOU–who are well known trolls.You’re REALLY SCARED, aren’t ya!

        :mrgreen:

        You should be.

    • ritamary

      I find the far-right commenters disturbing also. They portray Obama as being a liberal. He is not a liberal. He is an opportunist. He changes his positions according to who he is talking to. He says whatever he thinks will get votes.

    • beebop

      As someone who has supported and has skin in this game for more than 36 years, I feel that between my personal observations and where this party has erred, I can pretty much say what I want. If you don’t like it, or think that my McCain vote says whatever you need it to say to rubber stamp your thinking process, that is fine with me. But the same people who come here bitching about their constitutional rights better get a big clue: zeromama will NEVER rule with a majority of American’s support if he gets elected.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      I challenge the wingnuts every time I see them–shame does seem to work with them. They, at the very least, tone it down, or quit with the broad-brushed bullshit.

      I urge everyone to do the same. There’s no reason why, because of our strategic positioning, that we should be assumed to be associated with some of those cheesy views.

      My eyes are on the prize in four years’ time. In the interim, I don’t think McCain is a dreadful caretaker, particularly when balanced by a D Congress. That’s MY agenda.

      The trolls, however, are impervious to shaming. They’re impervious to logic. They lack basic intelligence. They just want their seven bucks an hour, and they delight in slash-n-burn–it’s a way that powerless people with meaningless lives can feel powerful.

      However, their presence here, believe it or not, is a good thing, in a perverse way–they are trolling here only because OBAMA IS LOSING. If he were winning, they’d not bother. Axelrod wouldn’t be paying them, and no one would pay websites like this one any mind. They’d be too busy picking out their outfits for the Inaugural Ball…instead, they’re trying to retrieve that Sure Victory that they somehow, in a drunken stupor, accidentally flushed down the shitter.

      • just me

        I just don’t understand why they cannot get their own “New Wave” site and all go there to post to their hearts content.

        Zero to 100 is easy when they come here and spew as they do ….
        A spin is a spin no matter which way they try do it.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          Their goal is to disrupt discussion here–to “get in their face” as their hero said.

          The idea, they quite stupidly think, is that they can demotivate the PUMA contingent. In actual fact, they have the very opposite effect.

          Most of them are young and stupid, and they are getting advice and a small trolling paycheck from people who are political naifs. They don’t understand the “I’m older and I’ve got more insurance” attitude of PUMAs. They make the mistake of thinking that WE are like THEM.

          We aren’t.

          We aren’t going to be “put off” by fucking punks with cheetoh-stained hands; we’ve dealt with those types–before AND often–and we’re not going to be knocked off stride by their bullshit. In fact, it only makes us more determined.

          I’ve gone from “Maybe this will be the first election I sit out” to “Maybe I’ll vote for McKinney” to “Fuck it, I’m voting for the Ancient Mariner.” Amusingly enouh, these hot-pocket-munching assholes have played a small role in that evolutionary process. I may just do some GOTV work for Johnny, too–and let my friends in the Democratic Party structure know it, too.

          The bright side of the trolling is, as I have said, that their very presence indicates an ABIDING FEAR in the Obama Camp. The more you see them, the more concerned Team Obama is that they’re headed down the tubes.

          The other bright side is that the site hits by these trolling idiots provide revenue for the site owners. That’s always a good thing–it keeps this place viable!

  • schmog

    Obama’s campaign:

    said today that Franklin Raines is not one of his economic advisors: “This is another flat-out lie from a dishonorable campaign that is increasingly incapable of telling the truth. Frank Raines has never advised Senator Obama about anything — ever

    Washington Post 7/16/2008:

    On the Outside Now, Watching Fannie Falter

    In the four years since he stepped down as Fannie Mae’s chief executive under the shadow of a $6.3 billion accounting scandal, Franklin D. Raines has been quietly constructing a new life for himself. He has shaved eight points off his golf handicap, taken a corner office in Steve Case’s D.C. conglomeration of finance, entertainment and health-care companies and more recently, taken calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.

    OBAMA LIE #456

    • wodiej

      wow, the Obama campaign is the gift that just keeps on giving! Another damaging ad should be forthcoming.

    • vinnie

      OBAMA LIE #456

      Is that all, I thought he hit the 800 mark already.

    • abbie

      I’m sure it’s not the Franklin Raines he thought he knew!

      • Carol

        Franklin Raines probably was just a casual acquaintance who lived in his neighborhood. He saw him maybe once or twice when he dumped the garbage.

  • SnarlingCur

    If a “Crime Fighter” fights crime,
    and a “Fire Fighter” fights fire,
    what do you think a “Freedom Fighter” fights?

  • hilldemgoneindie

    excellent. i was annoyed beyond reason that the whole topic was shifted to troll snarking. it was an excellent article but good luck finding much commentary or conversation about it. sad.

  • benny

    If you read politico, you find that the ‘republican’ brand is making a comeback. especially among the independents. this is what happens when the obamacrats get nasty. the independents are not stupid. they saw the paranoia when Palin was chosen. the more the obamacrats get sleazy, the worse its gonna be. And please note: I said Obamacrats, not democrats.

    • fluffy bunny

      yep. the more barry’s acolytes “get in their faces” out here, the more temporary republicans they create. unfortunately for barry, the general election for president is a secret ballot.

      please, please don’t give him the opportunity to turn all voting into “card check” here in the USA

    • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

      The Democratic leadership in Congress took the golden opportunity it was given in 2006 and pissed it away on petty partisanship — just like the Republicans who preceded them did. All Pelosi and Reid have done for the past two years is campaign for Barack Obama. Look at this child predator law of McCain’s that Reid wants held up to benefit Obama. Look at the drilling issue Pelosi just pushed through the House.

      Democrats opposed every measure to increase domestic oil production, and they angered millions of Americans. And when they finally tried to claim they were for new drilling by producing two bills that allowed new drilling only where there was little or no oil, Americans quickly picked up on the scam. They are selfish and corrupt.

  • wodiej

    I admit I am one who does this and as much fun as it can be to swat at the trolls, the post is right on…ignore them and they will go away.

    see most of us are solid on who is best for the country. but what if some undecideds are here posting-they won’t hear what’s really important. The trolls do not listen to reason anyway so they are just getting a good laugh at our expense.

    I promise to do my part and refrain.

  • Scully

    THANK YOU for posting this! I am SO sick of people responding to trolls. WHAT IS THE POINT?! All that happens is the comments get too irritating to read and people start to ignore them.

  • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

    you can watch Palin and McCain at fox but to get it you have to click to watch Obama then pick McCain
    http://www.foxnews.com/

    • sjc-tx

      I have recently grown to admire Greta! Well said Greta!!!!

  • benny

    If you read politico, you find that the ‘republican’ brand is making a comeback. especially among the independents. this is what happens when the obamacrats get nasty. the independents are not stupid. they saw the paranoia when Palin was chosen. the more the obamacrats get sleazy, the worse its gonna be. And please note: I said Obamacrats, not democrats.

  • LogicallySpeaking

    Why they earn their $7/hour.

    …or 5.39 if your female.

    • arabella trefoil

      lolol!

    • Eden

      lol

  • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

    Palin got him on the get in their face remark.

    • Indy

      What did she say? tia

  • beverly leslie

    THIS IS FROM HEIDI LI’S BLOG: ALL DEMOCRATS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN SAVING THE PARTY FROM SOETERO OBARFY’S THUGS:

    “Senator Obama and the DNC are truly determined to make the Democratic party as undemocratic as possible
    CQ Politics is reporting a new twist in the shameless collusion between Senator Obama and the DNC to suggest that, at a time when the Democratic Party is deeply divided, it is somehow Senator Obama’s prerogative to pick the next DNC chair. (Thanks to Dem4Hill for drawing my attention to the story.)

    Apparently the new Democratic Party way is for one chair to overrride rank and file Democrats and use any number of unscrupulous tactics to install his preferred candidate as the nominee and then that nominee turns around and arrogates to himself the right to pick the next chair, even though it remains entirely uncertain that Senator Obama will win the general election or even if he does manage to do so that he will do more than squeak by. In any event, one thing we know about Senator Obama: he is not very good at forging coalitions among different segments of rank and file Democrats, let alone being able to “unify” the Party or the country. Since the DNC is meant to be the official representative of all Democrats (not that it has even pretended to live up to that job description under the stewardship of current chair Howard Dean), it is patently absurd to put the future of the Party’s internal leadership in the hands of Senator Obama. The cycle of egomanical self-servingness has just been ratcheted up.

    Since the DNC claims that the reason Senator Obama gets to dictate who the next DNC chair is, it is ever more important for the medium and long term health of the Democratic Party that Senator Obama not win this election. Here’s the passage from the CQ Politics story that informs us that Senator Obama’s internal party is based on the assumption he will win the general election, and that if he does win the DNC will once again hold a fake election rather than a real vote for the position of chair:

    ‘“We expect Sen. Obama to be in the White House, and it’ll be his
    decision as to who’ll be nominated” to succeed Dean, said Stacie
    Paxton, national press secretary for the DNC.

    If Obama is
    elected, he will designate his choice for the chairmanship, and DNC
    members would be expected to ratify his decision at a meeting
    immediately after Inauguration Day on Jan. 20.’

    The story goes on to say:

    ‘If the Democrats do not win the White
    House, a special party meeting would be called for an election to be
    held between Jan. 1 and March 1, said DNC officials. Dean and his
    predecessor, Terry McAuliffe, were both elected in meetings during the
    month of February.’

    If this is the way the DNC wants to play this, then there is only thing to be done by Democrats who care about seeing their Party survive the civil war that Senator Obama and Howard Dean have already brought to it. Senator Obama must not win the general election. And his defeat must come at the hands of Democrats who now realize that in the new Democratic Party way no compromise is allowed. If no compromise is allowed, if Senator Obama is determined to make the entire Democratic Party revolve around him and the DNC is willing to be a mere satellite to Senate Obama, then responsible and wise Democrats must make sure that Senator Obama loses this election.
    Regular readers of this space know that I am one of the co-founders of The Denver Group, whose general election initiative is Democrats for Principle Before Party. That initiative is using advertising in mainstream media to fight for the long term survival of the Democratic Party. Just as The Denver Group took the matter of placing Senator Clinton’s name in nomination from the web and into the mainstream media, Democrats for Principle Before Party now intends to take the message that in order for the Democratic Party to win back its credibility rank and file Democrats must rid the Party of Senator Obama’s apparent stranglehold. We know our ads made a critical difference in making sure Senator Clinton’s name was at least put into nomination in Denver. We know that the ads we have in the pipeline ready to run in swing states and in key print publications in Washington DC will make a critical difference in the fight to save the Democratic Party for long time rank and file Democrats and for those who will come after us needing a Democratic Party that is inclusive, tolerant, and pluralistic in both its internal affairs and as a matter of the policies it pursues for the country.”

    ANYONE WHO IS THINKING OF VOTING THIRD PARTY OR NOT AT ALL SHOULD REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS AT STAKE OF OBLAH BLAH WINS.

    • fluffy bunny

      WOW, did you email this to Larry and Susan? It deserves its own thread….

    • schmog

      Here is another perfect example of an Obama “thug”:

      The not-so-funny Sandra Bernhard:

      Now you got Uncle Women, like Sarah Palin, who jumps on the s–t and points her fingers at other women. Turncoat b—h! Don’t you f–kin’ reference Old Testament, bitch! You stay with your new Goyish crappy shiksa funky bulls–t! Don’t you touch my Old Testament, you b—h! Because we have left it open for interpre-ta-tion! It is no longer taken literally! You whore in your f–kin’ cheap New Vision cheap-ass plastic glasses and your [sneering voice] hair up. A Tina Fey-Megan Mullally brokedown bulls–t moment.

      Thanks Obama for a wonderful election year and the shining leadership and example you provide for your devoted follwers…

      • Eden

        How can people hate that much?

      • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

        I live in Toronto, and when Sandra Bernhardt was here for pride week, she had some horrible comments about Hillary Clinton. It looks like she’s well on the way to becoming the quasi-female Andrew Dice Clay.

      • http://N/A breeze

        “….You whore in your f–kin’ cheap New Vision cheap-ass plastic glasses…..”

        Yea, right! Those “cheap New Vision glasses”
        are Wang(I think that’s the name) designed and start at $350.00…

        I know because I’d just love to be able to get
        me some and I have researched them.

      • KathyNeocon

        Bernhard is a psycho. She also warned Palin not to come to NYC or she’ll be gang-raped:

        http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2008/09/19/2008-09-19_sandra_bernhard_issues_gang_rape_warning-2.html

    • RJ

      Anyone who stays home, votes third party or writes in a name IS VOTING FOR BARACK OBAMA. The ONLY way to make sure he is not elected is to vote for John McCain, an honorable man and proven strong leader.

      McCain/Palin ’08
      Hillary ’12

  • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

    Fox says this is good news…

    Gallup Daily: Obama Now Leads McCain by 5 Points NEW
    September 19, 2008
    Presidential preferences continue to shift toward Barack Obama in the midst of an unsettling Wall Street crisis that is shining a different spotlight on the presidential candidates. Voters now prefer Obama over John McCain by 49% to 44%.

    http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx

    • db

      Dream on!

      McCain is going to kick BO’s butt come Nov.

      The Republican’s have a few bullets up their sleeves.

    • schmog

      The polls will be all but unreliable until after the debates. See previous election years’ pre-debate polls – they are all over the place and more often than not had no relation to the final vote tallies.

      • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

        I agree, they are meaningless right now…for every one that says Obama is ahead there is one that says a tie or McCain is ahead.

    • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

      McCain Gains On Issues, But Stalls As Candidate Of Change
      Presidential Race Remains Even

      http://people-press.org/report/450/presidential-race-remains-even

      When the current survey of registered voters is narrowed to those most likely to vote, the margin between the candidates contracts further. Among 2,307 likely voters surveyed, the race is tied at 46%-46%.

  • benny

    come on Perry Logan, you got to be logical. Why would repugs come here and bait the democrats? no, that doesn’t sound right. Its obama trolls who behave like repugs who come here. get over the hate of repugs, perry. and ensure that crazy Obama loses. In 2012, its’ll be another story.

    • KathyNeocon

      Thank you. I’m a Republican and a Hillary supporter. Was a Democrat for 20+ years but since the loonies took over the party, I checked out. If Hillary had won the nomination, I would’ve voted for her. I’m not going anywhere.

  • WildChild

    There is one simple truth in life. Ignoring it won’t make it go away. It’s the basic premise behind the freedom of speech. No idea is too terrible. No dissent is too trying. Our thoughts are never pushed into darkness where they can slowly mutate into abomination. That’s how evangelic conservatism was born… in darkness. It’s also where obamination progressivism was born. We haven’t learned much from the extremes we have just lived through if we are seriously entertaining the idea of ignoring the fringes who brought us these movements.

    I promise you…they won’t go away.

  • Hillary2012

    Thank You for the 1. Ignore 2. Ignore 3. Ignore rule.
    But however I still believe this is going to be a MCGovern style outcome.
    I really think that BO is going to loose BIG TIME.
    And they are going to blame it on race.
    This is going to make it much harder for a real black candidate.
    Also those those race baiting issues, the fact that race is always introduced by Obama himself.
    Josh Howard as the latest sad example of a black racist Obama fan.
    The whole Obama campaign is making it really hard when a real African American with integrity, experience and qualifications is going to run for POTUS.
    People will remember 2008 and say “no thanks”.

    • http://N/A breeze

      QUOTE:

      The whole Obama campaign is making it really hard when a real African American with integrity, experience and qualifications is going to run for POTUS.
      People will remember 2008 and say “no thanks”.

      I was thinking that just last night, H2012.

      I came to the conclusion that an Hispanic will
      probably make it to POTUS first.

      SAD!!!

      • Andrew

        Breeze, I don’t disagree with the sentiment, but what saddens me is that identity politics are weakening this country at the same time the world is becoming a more dangerous place every day. I frankly don’t give a damn if the first “minority” president is brown or black or red or yellow, as long as she or he is the best person to provide the leadership we desperately need. That’s why I support Hillary Clinton. The fact that she is a woman enhances her appeal in various ways, but it is secondary to me. I would support her if she was male over a female opponent with lesser qualifications. Barack Hussein Obama would not be where he is today without appealing to racial identity. It is worse than dangerous. It is un-American. It will remove the U from the USA.

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        Why would it be sad if an Hispanic becomes the first Prez?

        • http://N/A breeze

          Trixta,

          I apologize if that came out ‘wrong’….
          I did NOT mean to offend anybody.

          What I meant by ‘sad’ is that this individual
          has, by his narcissism, ruined the opportunity
          that was given to him. It will reflect on his
          ‘race’, although I do not believe he represents
          African Americans. But that’s only my opinion.

          I am, personally, with Andrew (above)and others
          that don’t care about the colour or sex of the
          person, just the ability to “provide the right
          leadership”, especially at times like these.

    • churl

      I would love to see Colin Powell make a move on the national scene now that the BushStink has faded a bit.

  • benny

    thats strange. gallup has Obama up by 5, rasmussen has them both even. and both seem to be reliable tracking polls. very strange……

    • schmog

      Ignore the polls until after the debates. Pre-debate polls have historically been all over the map. What’s important are the trends that start after the debates.

  • http://N/A breeze

    I N T E R N E T T R O L L

    The object of this page is to bring together a definitive document to cover the utter sadness of the Internet TROLL. Usually, a troll is nothing more than a passing nuisance, but, as this page will show, they can be a worry (stalkers). However, it is almost invariably an inadequate individual who can be safely ignored.

    This page will define the activity, and help with early recognition; once acknowledged, trolls can take up residence, and, like athlete’s foot, can be difficult to shift. And when you’ve finished here, I recommend this fairly comprehensive guide to managing sad thirteen year olds loose on Mom’s computer.

    What Is A Troll?

    The term derives from “trolling”, a style of fishing which involves trailing bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The troll posts a message, often in response to an honest question, that is intended to upset, disrupt or simply insult the group.

    Usually, it will fail, as the troll rarely bothers to match the tone or style of the group, and usually its ignorance shows.

    Why do trolls do it?

    I believe that most trolls are sad people, living their lonely lives vicariously through those they see as strong and successful.

    Disrupting a stable newsgroup gives the illusion of power, just as for a few, stalking a strong person allows them to think they are strong, too.

    For trolls, any response is ‘recognition’; they are unable to distinguish between irritation and admiration; their ego grows directly in proportion to the response, regardless of the form or content of that response.

    Trolls, rather surprisingly, dispute this, claiming that it’s a game or joke; this merely confirms the diagnosis; how sad do you have to be to find such mind-numbingly trivial timewasting to be funny?

    Remember that trolls are cowards; they’ll usually post just enough to get an argument going, then sit back and count the responses (Yes, that’s what they do!).

    http://www.flayme.com/troll/

    How can troll posts be recognised?

    No Imagination – Most are frighteningly obvious; sexist comments on nurses’ groups, blasphemy on religious groups .. I kid you not.

    Pedantic in the Extreme – Many trolls’ preparation is so thorough, that while they waste time, they appear so ludicrous from the start that they elicit sympathetic mail – the danger is that once the group takes sides, the damage is done.

    False Identity – Because they are cowards, trolls virtually never write over their own name, and often reveal their trolliness (and lack of imagination) in the chosen ID. As so many folk these days use false ID, this is not a strong indicator on its own!

    Crossposting – Any post that is crossposted to several groups should be viewed as suspicious, particularly if unrelated or of opposing perspective. Why would someone do that?

    Off-topic posting – Often genuine errors, but, if from an ‘outsider’ they deserve matter-of-fact response; if genuine, a brief apposite response is simply netiquette; if it’s a troll post, you have denied it its reward.

    Repetition of a question or statement is either a troll – or a pedant; either way, treatment as a troll is effective.

    Missing The Point – Trolls rarely answer a direct question – they cannot, if asked to justify their twaddle – so they develop a fine line in missing the point.

    Thick or Sad – Trolls are usually sad, lonely folk, with few social skills; they rarely make what most people would consider intelligent conversation. However, they frequently have an obsession with their IQ and feel the need to tell everyone. This is so frequent, that it is diagnostic! Somewhere on the web there must be an Intelligence Test for Trolls – rigged to always say “above 150″

    Who is at risk?

    Any newsgroup, bulletin board, forum or chatroom can attract trolls, but they don’t have the brains to attack nuclear physicists, and they are drawn to the quick response where sex, religion and race are found; so politics is easy prey.

    One troll famously tried to infiltrate a mensa group; the results read like 100 trolls and one regular, it didn’t have a chance – but it was stupid enough to persist until removed.

    When Should You Be Concerned?

    Usually, no, though fractured funny bones and occasional waves of nausea have been reported.

    When a troll become persistent and personal, you may need to consider the possibility that it has fermented into an Internet Stalker – equally pathetic, if not more so – but sometimes requiring weedkiller. Find Out More

    Trolls – if they had brains, they just might be dangerous!

    • Ginger

      Are these people you would wish to speak to in any other situation? I doubt it….keep this in mind.
      Trolls don’t have friends. On the internet, because they interact with human beings, they can convince themselves that they are important, the centre of the universe – that, to them, is better than any friendship. Don’t foget, the troll thinks he is always right, and therefore better than other folk. In real life, exactly the opposite applies. the troll has no friends and virtually no interaction with other people.

      If he’s a teen (many are), then he lives in his bedroom, trolling, playong computer games with ‘friends’ (who he doesn’t know at all), and joining roleplay sites, where – of course – he is a hero, or a powerful villain, who is respected in an inverse ratio to the respect he feels for himself.

      If he’s an adult, then he has serious social issues. He may work, where people think he’s a weirdo, and avoid him, he may sponge off his parents or be ‘looking for work’, which means he blames everyone for his problems. Except himself.

      Most people who are out of work are nothing like the stereotype; most want to work, and gain their self respect through work and being part of the world; but the troll IS the stereotype whining scrounger, to whom the world owes a living.

      • arabella trefoil

        You mean, all these people on No Quarter are not my friends? I thought they were.

    • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

      In fairy tales a troll is a monster that hides under a bridge waiting for a likely victim to cross. When a lone traveler happens upon the scene he jumps out and attacks.

  • tampagurl

    OK,I admit it, I’m guilty. I just can’t stand it when they spread lies and twist the truth. I will do my best to stop.

    I just finished watching Geraldine Ferraro, defending Obama for paying his female staff in the Senate less then the men. I couldn’t believe it, she not only drank the kool aid, she got drunk on it!

    What has Obama offered her to make her abandon her beliefs & her fellow sisters? Is this what our women leaders do in order to play in the good ole boys club?

    I think that is one of the reasons I like Sarah. I think she is willing to take them on and call them out for their hypocrisies.

    • Andrew

      I agree. It was his trashing of her, equating her with Farrakhan, that absolutely convinced me he was irredeemable scum. Circumstances dictate that we cut Hillary a little slack right now, but Geraldine Ferraro—Say it ain’t so!

  • ame

    What do you do when the troll keeps tapping you on the shoulder? I had one follow me from diary to diary on DKos.

    • schmog

      Step 1: stop going to DKos..

      • ame

        That wasn’t a recent incident. My point is; some trolls are extremely persistent.

  • Cindy

    Good, sound advice, Hampster. Thanks.

  • TeakWoodKite

    NewHampster;

    Thanks. Sometimes it like one needs a weed trollwacker.

    You rase an interesting point about the “echo Chamber” and the ability to have civil discourse on a difference of views.

    Again TGIF

  • Hank

    Well the election fraud has started. An AA female was complaining that her dead father and 5 year old son got a voter registration form. Yet she has not received hers and she requested one. This segment came out in CNN Headline News this morning.

    • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

      I saw a piece about this in readers articles at RCP yesterday…it said the little boy got one nothing about dead father, maybe a different story…said it was half filled out already…he is 5 years old.

      • vinnie

        smells like ACORN

    • Hank

      Here is a link to the story. Except it does not mention the boys mom comment that her father who passed also got one.

      http://www.news4jax.com/news/17500682/detail.html

    • wodiej

      well of course they aren’t going to admit it came from their office. And any mail out of their office has the supervisors name on it…hmm, now that will be added to all future fraudelent mailings.

      • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

        I have seen ACORN story’s 3 times this week…

  • Hillary2012

    The only way Obama can win is by fraud.
    How convenient this Wall Street Crisis is for Obama.
    Lifts him up in the polls.
    Is that part of the strategy?

    • Alice Paul WPB

      Yes, look at what Soros is all about. He is behind the DNC.

      People who are hurting financially and are scared will run to CHANGE with out asking to many questions.

      He makes a lot of money by crashing economies plus gets his socialist candidate into office.

      Hopefully Americans aren’t that stupid.

    • wodiej

      I’m glad I am not the only one who was thinking that.

    • Kal

      I think the timing of short selling whipping this whole thing up is no coincidence.

  • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

    AP is helping play the race card now…from Hot Air
    McCain ad: “Jim Johnson”
    http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/19/mccain-ad-jim-johnson/

    at the bottom
    Update (AP): Does running a Jim Johnson ad mean McCain’s not racist now?
    http://patterico.com/2008/09/18/unbelieveable-times-karen-tumulty-calls-a-perfectly-legitimate-and-timely-mccain-ad-racist-why-because-franklin-raines-is-black-and-so-is-obama/

    • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

      We need a Penny Pritzker ad, too. There’s at least a half dozen close Obama acquaintances knee deep in this Wall St. crisis whack-a-mole game.

    • Kal

      Somebody ought to put McC onto the fact that BO appears to have received low interest mortgage money to help seal the Rezko deal re his house and side yard.

      Realbarackobama ought to have details on this.

  • Mamatx

    Thanks for the heads up on trolls. I’ve noticed that many, many Obamabots repeatedly post things explicitly or implicitly stating that those who will not vote for THE ONE are stupid and/or racists. Is that a sign of a troll also?

    • wodiej

      yep

    • Ginger

      I find in the last few weeks, the first thing a troll posts is an insult…to stop the conversation and control the emotions of posters. Once they get you mad, the subject and all you good intentions are gone, and it just becomes third grade. The moment someone insults you, disengage. No matter what they say or how many times they say it, do not respond. On some sites they have actually posted 3-7 posts after i stop, trying in desperation to re-engage me. It apparently makes them nuts. If you want to make them mad, do not respond, it works great. I have returned hours later to read their posts and they started talking to each other, patting their own backs as if they did something, generally outing themselves to the entire board.
      Want to hurt or anger a troll? Do not respond, they can’t handle it. It’s a truly lovely thing.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        Ask them if they are

        PAID

        or

        AFRAID

        or BOTH?

        Because that’s generally the case.

        Then, laugh at them. Like so: :lol:

  • Palin4Prez

    Wapo Editors come out in force against the Messiah–keep the pushback up:
    —————

    Wapo Editors: Obama Being Deceptive on McCain’s Regulatory Record

    • Kal

      Holy cats! I just went onto that WaPo article and realized that one of BO’s advisors on this economic mess is the misogynist Lawrence Summers — the former Pres. of Harvard U. who got run out of office for claiming that one of the several reasons why women don’t hold top scientific jobs is because of sex-based differences in ‘intrinsic aptitude’ for science.

      I knew about the misogynist Goulsbee, the 150 expert economists who all have a strange sort of gender sight impairment, and Cass Sunstein, who would not recognize the validity of genuine sex equality claims even if they were ringingly endorsed by the USSCt — but Summers? !! Ring the alarm bells!!

      Here is a link to just what is wrong with the way Summers uses his mind:

      http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/news/LawrenceSummers_Response.pdf

  • benny

    Hey, one of us should keep an eye on daily kossacks and huffingtons. when McCain wins, looks like they’ll do mass suicide. they seem to be emotionally invested in Obama winning. when that doesn’t happen, one of us should be there to give them some counselling, and get them back on their feet. so I recommend one of ours to be there, and keep a watch. :-)

    • WildChild

      I plan an aggressive intervention with kleenex and hot Coca.

      • yttik

        That’s very kind of you.

        I plan to make some popcorn so I can watch the show.

    • wodiej

      I don’t know if that will help…probably be down in their basements drinking their final vial of kool aid aka Jim Jones….

    • dixie

      NO NO NO — No helping the sick jerks. Let em set fire to themselves or jump off a bridge (a high one). Let em sky dive without chutes or go swimming skinny dippin with concrete water wings. Let em self destruct–the sooner the better.

    • Ginger

      You do it….I will not go there…..that is where the ‘fire in the streets’ crap started back in December. They are psychotic. After banning me and blocking me, monitoring my posts and generally spitting on me….they asked me to post on their site. I marked them as spam. I still do it, whenever they send me anything. I blame HuffyPoo for most of the division in the dem party, they drew clear lines in the sand. My feeling is they should stay on their side and I’ll stay here with the sane people. They scare me more than the classic bot/trolls do…..serious delusion is spreading on that site. They will need meds, and counseling in Nov. and I honestly have no sympathy for them.
      If you had suggested darting Arianna and getting her re-programmed, I would donate to that cause.

    • ritamary

      I never went to Daily Kos but I don’t believe those at Obamington Post deserve any sympathy. They drove any decent people away from that site a long time ago. Let the full force of their bad karma bite them in the butt.

  • ACPD

    http://politicallydrunk.blogspot.com/2008/09/obamas-sub-prime-buddies-lehman.html

    I used to vote for Democrats, but even before this election cycle I began to have doubts. My first doubt arose when Chris Dodd came up for re-election to the Senate. Since then, I have contacted him to ask him why, as chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, he hasn’t investigated hedge funds. I never got a response. Then I noted that his financial backing for his White House run came largely from the banking and finance industries. Now banks are failing and Wall Street is a mess. I want to know why no one is asking Chris Dodd and the Democrats why they didn’t investigate hedge funds, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I want to know why they have allowed credit card and mortgage companies to take advantage of consumers. I want to know why Obama never challenged his Democratic cronies. Yes, the Republicans did a lot wrong, but so did the Democrats. I believe that McCain and Palin have the right moral compasses and the courage to sort this out. I certainly do not believe that Obama and Biden can fix our economy.

    • wodiej

      Chris Dodd’s name keeps coming up alot lately…me smells a skunk….

      • Docelder

        And when I think of Delaware… the first thing that comes to mind is credit card companies who incorporate there because of Delaware law. Not really a warm fuzzy.

    • http://mccaindemocrats.wordpress.com/ 30yrdem-not any more

      The same people padding Obama’s pockets were padding his also to keep quiet. Dodd will not investigate himself…he is the head of the committee that watches over places like Fannie and Freddie, he took the money and let them bundle bad loans and sell them to the banks and look where we are now…he needs to be removed form office in my opinion.

    • Ginger

      Dodd got more money from Freddie and Fannie lobbyists than even Obama, in fact he’s the only one that got more than Barry.

      • Kal

        Somebody ought to rank those donations by annual averages, not by lifetime totals.

        Puts BO at the top of the list, you know.

  • http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/ Not Your sweetie

    Obama tries to pander to women – protesters interrupt
    http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/protesters-interrupt-obama/

    • ritamary

      Did anyone read the comments? Here is one from Obot Vincent Perez that caught my attention. Interesting insight into their thought processes, and they call US racists?

      I just signed on and saw the news about Obama and the so called people heckeling him….WTF. What do black people expect of the man. We finally have a a viable black man that can win and all these ignorant niggas can ask is what he can do for us, why not ask the same of the last 40 something presidents including Mccain. It would be totally impossible for him to win if he got up there talking about black issues only, the last time i checked black and latinos make up maybe 20 to 25% of the population so lets be realisitc. It kills me to see these reports of black people especially black women crying over Hillary’s white ass not being nominated the last time i checked the Clintons did nothing for black people, the only thing Bill did is get on arsenio hall and played the sax and now he’s down….get the fuck out of here.

  • benny

    Afterall, the daily kossacks and huffingtons need to be brought back into the democratic party. Right now, they are Obamacrats, but when he goes down, some of you should guide them back to the democratic party (the force). They have gone over to the dark side for now. :-(

    • Docelder

      This I think is being misunderstood greatly. Win or lose this election… Obama has built an army of Obots… on the democratic dime. I don’t think the “Camp Obama” mentality is going away… win or lose. This has become something of a “cult”. If I knew a more articulate way to say that… I would have.

    • http://firefox KeeptalkinJoe

      benny, they can only come back after extensive de-programming. Otherwise, No. They can have the Hate Party.

  • kag224

    As someone who has been called a troll before on another site, I found this post interesting. I actually read many, many sites but rarely have the time to comment and then I comment on only a few sites, mostly because I can’t remember passwords etc. I was called a troll on another site when I posted ( a pro Hillary comment) by someone who had posted approximately 3000 (!) comments on that site and I had not posted many so ergo, I was called a troll. It was scary because you could tell the person was feeling extreme venom towards me. If the site accepts comments why are some folks comments more valid than others (more troll free?) simply because of the number of times the writer can or has posted? In addition, I want to comment on this idea of the topic threads being limited to the topics. I know another site where the front page commentators will actually count the number of times the writer posts a comment that is in contravention to their arguments and the front pagers will threaten to cut off access if the write does not curb it. Usually the guise is that the writer is going off topic.
    I can see wanting to limit the print exposure of folks who are posting nonsense or who maliciously change the topic or the tone of the thread or engage in personal attacks, but some threads are not isolated in topics and can generally touch on numerous ideas. Wouldn’t the thread be allowed to go where any conversation would go which means anywhere?
    Lastly, if the point of this was to ignore trolls and not feed the trolls why do a post obsessing on trolls? I enjoy this site but would hate to see it devolve into something like the other sites where if you don’t act in lock step with the persons able to post 3000 comments then you’re just a troll.

    • Country First

      I like this site too, and appreciate thoughtful comments, as I think most readers do. Hope you will keep coming, reading, and posting if you like.

    • McKatmoon

      Kag,
      It’s a great site and the conversations get intense and sometimes they take some wild turns and rides, the only rules I have ever seen applied at NQ are in regards to filth of the racist sexist nature, beyond that, the engaging of trolls happens,because we are human and we snap, and let’s face it have been accused by our own previous party of just about everything, sometimes, we work really hard, and sometimes there is a much needed smack down. I like your post, as it reminds me of a similar time when I went through the same thing you did. I can’t say I have ever been called a troll by an NQ regular, actually I never have. We have a lot of different walks we come from to a common ground, one which supports freedom of speech, and encouraging each other to vote. Glad you are here.

  • samb

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idEs94sX0DE

    OBAMA HECKLED AT RALLY. ENJOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Roxanne

      And? So what? A bunch of black guys holding up signs that read KKK.
      This was your monumental find?

      • samb

        I don’t call it a find its just a link, if you are such a Obama supporter don’t click on it .

        • Roxanne

          If you didn’t want people to click on it then why did you provide the link?

          • samb

            TROLL ALERT- ROXANNE IS A TROLL -SWARM SWARM

  • Dawnelle

    Excellent, excellent!

    IGNORE

    I too ascribe to that working practice. Rarely make a flub.

    (but I’m not around much lately so it’s mui easier)

    • Indy

      I ignore them too, only slipped up a few times on various boards over the years. My policy is to back away from the keyboard. A lot of the time I can find humor in the OPods drivel. In fact there is some funny stuff right here on this thread. Taking NewHampsters advice will result in easier reading of the threads here at NQ.

  • Roxanne

    New Hampster- The reason for the hijacking of your thread was probably because what you had to say wasn’t all that compelling…or at least interesting for that matter.

    Oh and does anyone know if grandpa John has learned the difference between the SEC or FEC yet? Or has he figured out that Spain isn’t part of Latin America? Nice ticket McCain/Palin. How can anyone possibly take those two jokesters seriously? No wonder they are plummeting in the polls. Can we say-losers! What a laugh.

    • Docelder

      Spain isn’t part of Latin America

      Geographically correct, culturally… there are strong ties to Spain.

      • Roxanne

        The interviewer wasn’t asking him about Spain’s culture. She was asking him specific questions about foreign policy.Which was more of a disaster than Palin’s deer in the headlights look when Charlie Gibson asked her about the Bush doctrine.

        • Ginger

          That look was because for a second Sarah thought Charlie was crazy….no one even knows what the Bush doctrine is. Even Charlie has given 3 separate definitions over the years. It was a trick question, all it really showed is Chuck’s yellow journalist streak is getting wider by the day.

          • Roxanne

            Most people, from middle school on up, are well aware that it was originally called (by the media and pundits)’the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive strike’.

            “His worldview”? Good answer Sarah, good answer.

            :rolls eyes:

            • WildChild

              See, you’re all fucked up. The bush doctrine was one of preventive strike. Not preemptive strike. Is what good for Sara to ask which one Charlie was talking about.

              • Nicole

                WildChild and Ginger: you’ve just broken the new rule! Ignore, ignore, ignore all trolls. It’s pointless to engage them and wastes valuable comment space.

                • WildChild

                  no.

                • McKatmoon

                  It’s actually not a rule, it’s a suggestion, and an effort, but We aren’t exactly known here for not arguing on topic. I agree, and try to ignore, but as always support those who must speak.

              • http://undercoverblackman.blogspot.com Undercover Black Man

                The bush doctrine was one of preventive strike. Not preemptive strike.

                And what, pray tell, did we “prevent” by invading Iraq, Wild Child?

                • Garfield

                  Undercover WHITE Man is back. Thrills.

        • Soldier of Christ

          There is no such thing as a Bush doctrine, Rozzana- this was made up by one of Fox anchormen. Everybody seems to be aware of this deception except Gibson, and I am assuming you too.

          • Roxanne

            You lose. It is a phrase that is now commonly used by political pundits and political scientists to describe a collection of Bush’s foreign policy agendas.

            I worry who your so-called ‘everybody’ is.

            • WildChild

              ah, so now it’s a collection of Bush’s foreign policy agenda’s. Now it makes even more sense why Sara asked for clarification.

            • Seattle Moss

              Poor Roxanne..
              How’s it feel to be 0 for 5 the past two weeks

              1..Not choosing Hillary for either the presidential or vice presidential nominee
              2..Miscalculating in selecting a bore like Biden
              3…Being sexist fools after McCain’s brilliant selection of Sarah Palin
              4…Having your main issue of failure and retreat in Iraq blow up in your face with the success of the surge.
              5..Wishing for a hurricane to hurt the republicans at their convention.
              6…Wishing for a stock market collapse only to see the market rebound after a great move by the Fed on mortgages.
              7…Watching Obama try to vote Present like always on the AIG bailout.
              8…Seeing Obama exposed with his lobby money from Fannie and Freddie.
              9…Watching democrats use illegal activity in hacking Palin e-mail accounts.
              10…Watching McCain catch and lead in the electoral college

              Not a great week for Obamabots who wish defeat and retreat for America!!

              • Seattle Moss

                I started with 5 and ended up with 10..
                Does anybody have any to add to the grief that these Obamabots are experiencing.

                • Roxanne

                  Sure Moss. That’s why we gained 9 points this week. No, I’ll be all smiles this evening with my veuve clicquot, thank you.

                  • Seattle Moss

                    Roxanne..
                    Why are you here and not out celebrating.
                    I followed many ellections and have a background in statistics and polling. Obama is losing the electoral college the same way democrats lost the past two elections.
                    All polling suggests that on election day Obama loses 5 points right off the top from undecided voters.
                    I’m going out to celebrate that America is winning the Iraq war and that Republicans have picked a great team in McCain/Palin
                    Just so that you know..
                    There is no more money for the programs which were so popular back in 2006.
                    The money has been spent and American’s don’t want their taxes raised during a recession.
                    You lose on all fronts!!

                    • http://undercoverblackman.blogspot.com Undercover Black Man

                      There is no more money for the programs which were so popular back in 2006.
                      The money has been spent and American’s don’t want their taxes raised during a recession.

                      Ummm… so where’s the $1 trillion for the Wall Street bailout gonna come from, Seattle Moss?

                    • Seattle Moss

                      Like I said undercover..
                      The money is gone now. The tax payers are footing the bill for the mortgage bailout plus everything else over the past 7 years.
                      It’s gone!
                      Now the money is not there for Obama’s big programs which might have been good in another time.
                      Having tax increases during an economic meltdown will bring about a great depression.
                      The revolution will have to wait for better times..Sorry dude!

                • http://msnGodhelpusall Lee M

                  COUNTING THE DAYS UNTIL OBAMA AND THE DNC ARE DUE IN PHILADELPHIA FOR DISCOVERY ON THE PHILIP BERG LAWSUIT.

                  Obama and the DNC are due to appear on the 24th. The FEC was due to answer on the 21st. That’s just a few days away, folks. Do you think they’ll show or will the “One” pull some more strings to thwart justice?

  • Donna Brazile no longer hatin

    Will no longer do my hatin on the following trolls:

    Free dumb
    Fritzee
    What the S Fu
    Seawhiner
    Coo Coo Wacko
    Jamezee
    Fran-Arse
    Dr. Wanker
    jeedeebee

    Darn it was fun!

    Stop the hate!

    • arabella trefoil

      I’m trying to decode all these names …

      • Donna Brazile no longer hatin

        Free dumb = Freedom Fighter
        Fritzee = JkFritz
        What the S Fu= SFHillary
        Seawhiner= seasiren
        Coo Coo Wacko= cocky wacko
        Jamezee= James
        Fran-Arse= Francis
        Dr. Wanker= Dr. Wang

        I hope this helps. I’m a little depressed since I can no longer hate on them.

        Stop the hate:-)

        • Donna Brazile no longer hatin

          Need to add:

          unveil the cover man= undercover black man

        • Roxanne

          Real mature you are, huh?

          You must have way too much time on your hands to be able to sit down and think of those petty little names for those posters. And none of those “names’ are even remotely clever.

          You really need to get a life, Donna.

          • Donna Brazile no longer hatin

            I forgot:

            Rock n the arse= Roxeanne
            gettin jiggy with it= ziggy

            My apologies!

            Last comment to you!

            Stop the hate:-)

            • cocky whacko

              Too bad Donna. I was really looking forward to the substantive policy arguments. I am sure I could learn so much from someone with your educational background.

    • http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508 Beowulf

      Free dumb
      Fritzee
      What the S Fu
      Seawhiner
      Coo Coo Wacko
      Jamezee
      Fran-Arse
      Dr. Wanker
      jeedeebee

      Thanks for the list. LOL, how come these $7/hour trolls haven’t been banned?

  • veteranfortruth

    And, the media continues to throw the race card in attempting to force Senator Obama’s selection as President.

    It is time for people to respond en masse to let these media outlets know that we are tired of their manipulation of the news. If you are concerned, you can start by reading this article:

    Washington Post Faults McCain For Relying On…Washington Post
    http://corner.nationalreview.com/

    and replying to Deborah Howell, the Ombudsman at The Washington Post, here:
    ombudsman@washpost.com

    If we all remain silent on this type of advocacy journalism and race-baiting we will get the President we deserve…a scary thought indeed.

    • http://www.centristnet.com Geoff

      I sent an email to her:

      ———- Forwarded message ———-
      From:
      Date: Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:39 PM
      Subject: Your Kurtz article Today
      To: ombudsman@washpost.com

      The Washington Post is a national fixture in American journalism. You all printed twice the Raines provided housing and mortgage economic advice to the Obama campaign over the spring and summer. Politico wrote it in July as well based on your story.

      If the advice claim was false, why did Raines make it, and the Obama campaign not push back when the article was written and Politico also noted it, amongst others?

      Now, with McCain calling Obama on it and the housing oversupply issue front and center in this election, you allow Kurtz to again call McCain a liar and cover for the Obama campaign’s obvious lie that Raines never provided Obama any economic advice.

      I know y’all like Obama and all…..but seriously, are you a news organization or an Obama campaign division?

      Kurtz should be demanding that Obama admit the whole truth on his ties to Raines, and Johnson, and Pritzger – all of which have fingerprints on the subprime mess. Not to mention Rubin (pushed the Gramm bill to signature by Bill C., ran Citigroup policy re Enron and tried to use his influence with Treasury and credit reporters to prop it up) and Summers (also pro Gramm bill re deregulation) and the fact that Obama is #2 in Fannie Mae receipts of contributions since 1989 –he’s only been on the national scene since 04!

      So Obama lies, and your paper has evidence of Obama’s lie re no Raines ties, you printed and factchecked it, and you call McCain a liar?

      Disgrace.

      Redeem yourself and do a real story on this issue of Raines ties, be a jouralist not a campaign apparatus.

      Thanks for the address.
      http://www.centristnet.com

  • Diana L. C.

    Thank you for the advice, and thank you for last night’s post. It will be hard not to respond, but I did become very discouraged last night as I saw the discussion go completely off topic. I finally just shut down my computer. I am VERY interested in the discussion of sexism and feminism—as Hillary pointed out, women’s issues are HUMAN issues. I’ve really lost any interest in all other issues. I’ve become a one-issue voter this election. Sometimes I think a person just has to take a stand.

    I have almost made my decision to vote McCain. I am agonizing over this election, can’t stop thinking about it–ever since it became clear that the DNC was really “selecting” the candidate instead of running a democratic primary. When the Republicans stole the election from Gore, I was so incredibly angry. But having a party that has been part of my very being since I was in junior high, “working” as my class’s campaign manager for JFK, steal this election from Hillary, caused me more emotional distress than I have felt for years and years.

    It is just so HARD to say, “I will be voting Republican, the party of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, etc., etc.” I had originally thought that all I would do is vote “present” because I can undervote and just vote down ticket. But I want to send the stronges message I can send to the DNC with my one vote.

    • Astra14

      Diana – you are not alone. This will be the first year I have ever voted Republican. My vote will be for John McCain; then I’ll downticket dems or independents (leaning towards the independents as of today. I don’t want to reward the Obama backers) because I don’t want an all Republican Congress with a Republican President.

      Hang tough! We’ll get through this! It’s for the good of our country this time.

      MCCAIN/PALIN 08
      HILLARY 2012

      • Roxanne

        Please.
        In the polls, they are sinking faster than the Palin family can spit out babies.

        Obama/Biden 08′

    • StrawberrybitesBarky

      I agree. This will be a rough one for me as well. I’ve never voted for a republican in my life. And I keep going back and forth on not voting at all or voting for McCain. I wish there was a box marked “YOU SUCK!”

  • https://secure.johnmccain.com/Contribute/Contributef.aspx?guid=aa60f933-6b64-449a-80af-0a52994863dd Linda

    roflmao

    GREAT RECOMMENDS NH!

  • pammc

    I still say with 100% republicans & the rest of us who can’t stand obama how does it come out to a win. Kerry & Gore lost with 100% dems & indys.

    • Jess Terr

      you can NOT underestimate the massive fraud that will permeate this election.
      For example, in Omaha, Nebraska, NObama has opened a “community organizer” (read voter fraud machine) to register dead folks, dogs and non-existent “people”. Why? Because Nebraska and Maine are the only states that split electoral votes based on district outcomes, and Omaha has a high AA population.
      MONITOR THE VOTE AND THE VOTE COUNT

      COUNTRY FIRST!!!

  • Kim

    More proof that Obama supporters are mentally challenged criminals:

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/more_liberal_thuggishness.html

  • DancingOpossum

    No, I have to say I agree with Perry on this one. Too many far-right whackjobs think we’re going to agree with them because we don’t support the Democratic candidate. In reality most of us don’t support him because he (by “he” I mean his campaign, his politics, his advisers, and so on) is enormously destructive to the Democratic Party. Most of us are lifelong, hardcore Democrats and have made a long-thought out, painful decision to not vote with our party this year. I really don’t want RW loonies thinking we’ve suddenly drunk THEIR Kool-Aid either.

  • Ginger

    Can this box for posting be put at the top of the comments section instead of the bottom? Part of the problem is that we have to scroll down thru all the posts, something catches the eye and the chaos ensues. if we could post our initial comments to the article before reading the troll posts it would stop some if not most of this. After posting if people want to read others posts and converse, fine, do that, but if posters with thoughts on the subject matter could post before the distractions occur it might help.

  • http://JohnMcCain.com Berserk “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease” Ohitler

    Trolls won’t be ignored. Its human nature to respond. You would have to moderate the board to keep things on topic. And that has its own pitfalls. Sure people can try and hat’s off to you for trying.

  • Eden

    You know, the trolls at Gretawire just ruin the blogs. I know that’s their intent. It’s just exhausting trying to have a conversation. I’m guilty of troll sparring, I guess it’s because they are allowed to relentlessly spam lie after lie there.

    I know they are doing it, I know it’s the same two or three changing names and doing the same stuff over and over again. If the plan is to disrupt, they are winning.

  • ziggy

    Hey, some may think I’m a lowly troll, but I assure you nobody pays me a nickel to express my opinions here. I just happen to believe this is an unusually important election, and happen to believe republican policies have held sway for way too long. I honestly believe they’ve got us headed high-speed toward the edge of a cliff. Obama was never my first choice for a democratic presidential candidate, but he’s the one I’ve currently got. For me he represents a change of possibilities.

    The main criticism of Obama that I give serious thought to is the assertion that he may be too far to the left. I figure that isn’t a danger since he wouldn’t be operating in a vacuum. He’s already been pulled toward the middle by political pressures. I believe the overall effect of his election would be a government less far to the right. The actual results would be centrist.

    I must confess I’m getting a little confused about the republican message after this past week. They seem about to take steps to socialize the free market system they’re always going on about. What the heck do all the bail-outs come down to? Socialism for the rich? I’m afraid what they’re doing is publicizing risk, while keeping profits private.

    Meanwhile, I worry that foreign investors are poised with all of the dollars they hold to buy up American assets at bargain-basement prices.

    Hey, how can regular private Americans get in on the fire sale? It seems like we should get the first opportunity.

    • WildChild

      I just happen to believe this is an unusually important election,/em>…

      so that’s what it takes to get you to care.

      • ziggy

        Yep. That’s all it takes. 2008 might be our last best chance for a meaningful course correction.

        If McCain promoted a crash-program for alternative energy instead of just talking drilling as the obvious road to national security and long-term prosperity, that would sway me.

        If he proposed a more equitable and fiscal responsible tax plan, that would sway me.

        If he suggested less military intervention and more diplomacy, that would sway me.

        If he clearly explained our specific plans in Iraq, and suggested Iraq could be helping to pay for our protection with oil, that might sway me.

        It’s not that I can’t be won over to a more conservative world view. I naturally tend to be liberal in some respects and conservative in others. McCain just isn’t showing me the conservative principles I agree with.

        • WildChild

          that’s a shame. Being an American, I care all the time. It doesn’t even take an election, much less an unusually important one

          • ziggy

            I believe you missed my point. I’ve cared each election. This one, however, seems like the most important I’ve ever seen. If we screw up here, we may not get a chance to undo the damage.

            I’m mainly thinking about debt, the deficits, the dropping dollar, and the increasing degree foreign control of our national destiny. There’s a point where you no longer have the remaining options you need to change course.

            • WildChild

              I didn’t misunderstand anything. You’re the one who said Yep. That’s all it takes. 2008 might be our last best chance for a meaningful course correction.

    • Soldier of Christ

      Boy ziggy if this is all that worries you about Obama than you need to take your head out of your ass and breath for while, child:

      William Ayers – American Terrorist
      Raila Odinga – Cousin, Radical Islamist
      Raul Reyes – Columbian Terrorist
      Antonio Rezko – Muslim Slum Lord
      Professor Khalidi – Muslim Terrorist Supporter
      Reverend Wright – Racist Muslim Supporter/Preacher, Anti-American
      Reverend James Meeks – Racist
      Reverend Louis Farrakhan – Racist Nation of Islam / Faux Preacher
      Reverend. Jesse Jackson – Racist – Anti-Semetic
      Nadhmi Auchi – Muslim Billionaire
      Sohaib Abassi – Muslim Millionaire

      • ziggy

        And the Bush family has had a lot of private business dealings with the bin Laden family.

        You can find all sorts of questionable connections with any prominent person. That doesn’t mean they’re relevant. I could make a long list of shady people McCain knows. G. Gordon Lidy? Palin, too. Like Senator Stevens? He’s running for reelction with 7 pending felony counts and more in the works.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        Don’t blame Jesse Jackson, there–he’s the one who had the knife out and wanted to cut the BoyKing’s nuts off! Jesse was also the guy who yelled BULLSHIT when Obama called Bill Clinton a racist, too after Bill commented about JJ’s historic candidacy.

        Retract that assertion. For all Jesse’s recent missteps, he hasn’t been “in the bag” for Obama throughout this process and it is absolutely VICIOUS and UNFAIR to lump him in with the rest of those assholes.

        There comes a point when he, like some others, are stuck doing the “necessary” with a gun to their heads, but he’s not ENTHUSED for Obama in any way, shape or form. Only an idiot would think otherwise.

  • Postmaster

    If it isn’t bad enough that we have Richardson lying in New Mexico, someone let Obama in yesterday so he could add to the lies. Where’s border patrol when you need them?

  • joe bob

    you should really concern yourself with more important matters, this is just silly and pretty much a waste of time and bandwith:

    The Republican Party has had a long record of blocking eligible voters from voting. In the past two Presidential elections, the country witnessed appalling efforts to limit voter participation in Ohio, Florida and throughout the country. It is beyond disgraceful that the Republican Party now seems to be targeting those who are suffering the most. It appears that individuals who can’t recall how many houses they own don’t understand how awful it is to lose your home to foreclosure, and don’t know that you don’t need to own property to vote in the United States of America.

    It should surprise no one that the people who gave us the worst economy since the Great Depression would now want to prevent those victimized by this economy from voting in the coming elections. Senator McCain needs to step forward now and halt the Republican Party’s efforts to profit politically from the economic misery of others.

    I wrote Senator McCain the attached letter and have asked the Justice Department to investigate.

    September 18, 2008

    The Honorable John McCain
    P.O. Box 16118
    Arlington, VA 22215

    Dear Senator McCain:

    As Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee (HJC), I am extremely concerned by recent media reports that the Chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County, James Carabelli, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes as a basis to challenge voters and block them from participating in the November 2008 election. I am writing to request that you denounce any efforts by the Republican Party, most notably in Michigan and Ohio, to engage in voter suppression, including challenges based on a voter’s home foreclosure status, and that you direct your supporters to refrain from engaging in such behavior. At a time when Americans are losing their homes at record numbers, it is difficult to imagine that anyone would attempt to capitalize on such misfortune for political gain. Furthermore, a rejection of this strategy would be consistent with your recent commitment to “a fair and transparent election.”

    The subprime mortgage crisis has affected a significant number of Americans, and as such, a significant number of voters could be disenfranchised with this Republican strategy to challenge voters based on home foreclosure status. More than 700,000, or one in every 171, of our nation’s households received at least one foreclosure-related notice from April to June of this year. It is estimated that 2.5 million homes will face foreclosure this year, an increase from 1.5 million in 2007. A Center for Responsible Lending report estimates that the highest default rates are expected to be in cities in California, Nevada, Michigan, New Jersey and Washington, D.C.

    A disproportionate number of those homeowners affected by the subprime mortgage crisis are minorities. The Center for Responsible Lending projects that 10 percent of African-American borrowers and 8 percent of Hispanic borrowers will be affected by foreclosure. In contrast, only 4 percent of white borrowers are expected to be affected.
    The Macomb County party’s plan to challenge voters who have defaulted on their home loans would disproportionately affect African Americans who are overwhelmingly Democratic voters. The plan could be a violation of the Voting Rights Act.

    With the 2006 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act, Democrats and Republicans alike agreed that discriminatory voter suppression tactics had not been completely eradicated and protections against such tactics were still necessary. Members of Congress, like you, voted in support of reauthorizing this Act because they recognized that fair and equal access to the ballot box has not yet been achieved for all Americans. Certainly there must be no denying the kind of negative impact that challenges based on home foreclosure status can have on historically disenfranchised voting populations who have traditionally been targeted by predatory practices. A person’s ability to exercise his or her right to vote should not be contingent upon financial circumstances.

    Notably, in 1981 a federal court condemned the Republican National Committee (RNC) for using vote caging tactics similar to the foreclosure list plan. Since the federal court’s decision in 1981 in New Jersey, the RNC has been under a federal consent decree to refrain from engaging in this practice. It is important to note that the Department, under President George H.W. Bush filed suit in 1990 to stop a vote caging effort by those associated with Senator Jesse Helms’s re-election campaign.

    As Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, I ask that you repudiate any efforts by the Republican Party and any of its state affiliates to engage in voter suppression and intimidation tactics, and that you direct your supporters across the country to refrain from engaging in such behavior. I would appreciate hearing from you directly on whatever actions you take in response to this request.

    Responses should be directed to the Judiciary Committee office, 2138 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (tel: 202-225-3951; fax: 202-225-7680). Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this important matter.

  • athy

    New Hampster,
    Good article! Good advice.

  • Eden

    Well fuzz. I went to the site to write my representatives about Obama and the Logan Act violations.

    Then it looks up my representatives: Dick Durbin and Obama. lol…I knew this, too, not sure why I went on with it.

    I’m going to send it anyway.

  • bayareavoter

    Amen, ignore the trolls. When I see their names I just scroll to the next post. Who CARES what they think?

  • KathyNeocon

    The trolls wouldn’t even be here if they weren’t scared ****less O-Windbag is going to lose. They’ve been sent out to invade blogs that don’t worship O-Windbag and “get in their face” to try and change our minds, as BO instructed them. And don’t buy into their crowing about the polls. They know the race is way too tight and O-Windbag is on the edge of a cliff.

    The trolls are mindlessly following the marching orders from their Supreme Cult leader.

  • http://home.comcast.net/~vincep312 Vince P

    I dont want my freaking country changed. Who does this arrogant quasi-Muslim think he is?

  • DirOfTheObv

    Got it!

  • ACPD

    http://www.realdemocratsusa.com

    If anyone is interested in checking out what other “D/(d)emocrats,” who are voting for McCain/Palin are saying, check out http://www.realdemocratsusa.com. I left the Democratic Party and now am an “Independent.” I did not join the Republican Party. I think most Americans are put off by the far Right and the far Left. That’s why McCain is doing so well. Playing the race card and trying to distract people with fear of the repeal of Roe v. Wade just aren’t working. (By the way, if you haven’t ever read that opinion, it is worth doing so. Nothing either McCain or Palin has said differs from what is actually stated in Roe v. Wade.) Don’t be distracted and don’t be sucked into mindless name calling. The narcissistic sociopaths of this country need to be defeated!

  • JKIR

    Palin is just an average American. When was the last time we had one of those in the Whitehouse, oops, wait, was it Bill and Hillary Clinton? That didn’t work out too badly. She’s moderate and interested in serving the WILL OF THE PEOPLE. Something we haven’t had for a while. Obama just wants to tell us what HE thinks is right for the people.

  • http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508 Beowulf

    LOL, I guess I got suckered by responding to two trolls, Freedom and Wang. Of course, I certainly did talk about feminism and Hillary. But hey, it was fun anyway, cutting off Freedom & Wang’s nuts off. :- )

    I never defend Sarah Palin by insisting she is a bonafied “feminist”, because I don’t think she is one, nor do the vast, vast majority of real feminist do.

    I’m voting for McCain-Palin because I know it is in the interests of feminists (as well as people who believe in racial harmony and a strong democratic coalition of women, blacks, labor, environmentalists) to defeat the misogynist Obama. I know what I want and have no need to turn Palin into a feminist.

    NOTE: In four years, eight years, or twelve years (i.e. a run for 2nd term), Hillary will very likely face off against Palin or some GOP female candidate with identical views and feminist credentials, or lack thereof. LETS NOT FOOL OURSELVES AS TO WHO IS THE REAL FEMINIST.

  • Sassy

    New Hampster,
    I agree with your post.
    While we all tend to wander off at times, I try to be respectful of the poster’s efforts and stay on the material.
    However, some of these trolls are lucky to be out of reach! Guess I should check my tolerance level, and get a fill-up!

  • morganjane

    I have been on the internet before blogs were invented and I actually enjoy responding to trolls, they will write their comments anyway, scripted or not… their talking points have been taken by the MSM. I like to tell them THE TRUTH on this site and everyother site I visit. These people are a part of internet life, they will never go away.
    Obama’s paid bloggers are out there leaving crazy comments everywhere, I feel I must say something back to them… just so others who may not know the facts or other points of view can read the debate. Debate is very important.
    And I enjoy going to the first thread on here and seeing what other news people are talking about that day. I come to this site not only to read the blog but to read the comments.
    I think it is funny that everyone has these imaginary rules for blogs, like wanting the comments to stay on subject and ignoring trolls. These comments make people feel uncomfortable, not the trolls but the people who like to comment on the stories and reply to other comments. Everytime someone writes one of these Don’t feed the trolls, Censor yourself blogs… it just makes me want to go somewhere else.

  • looking for integrity

    I had lunch with 16 colleagues today. The conversation became a fiasco as i was the lone voice for Hillary amid 15 Obama supporters.

    After lunch I received an number of call apologizing, seems most are voting for McCain but are afraid to say so.

    • KathyNeocon

      That’s very disturbing. Talk about groupthink, peer pressure and just plain old harassment. That’s a taste of the U.S. under BO & company if he gets in the White House. Any opposition to his regime will have to go underground. Very scary.

  • witness08

    The only thing to do is ignore the trolls. Do not reply to them. They are not trying to engage in a dialogue they are trying to taunt and to provoke. Don’t take the bait. Our time and energy is too precious to waste on bantering with trolls.

  • witness08

    Wow,
    looking for integrity that was an interesting note you posted. I feel that I’m the only note of dissent in my circle of friends here in NYC. They were already Obama supporters when I was behind Hillary. I wonder how many of us there are. This site along with “The Confluence” provides me with moral fortitude.

  • NQ Critic

    Freedom Fighter. Ugh. He’s not worth $7.

    In fact, without looking at names or knowing I’d say there is a good possibility that the one making the alert was Freedom Fighter himself as what we call a sock puppet or an accomplice.

    Good point. But if we ever got the protect we were promised we wouldn’t have to deal with this.

    You see: you are missing some valid points.

    #1. They have no respect for us because they have no respect for the organisation at NQ. It’s wide open like a herd of antelopes. They can come in here and wreak havoc and have fun and no one stops them. They regard us a a bunch of winnies.

    The thought that a discussion here is so important to a political campaign is pretentious. What is written here is not that important. Diverting a discussion here does no alter or influence the outcome on 4 November.

    #2. Markos Moutlitsas runs a tight ship. He has an excellent blog system and registrations are not allowed to post for 24 hours and you can’t post without being registered. Forums are closely monitored; posts can be upgraded but cannot be downgraded – promotes a positive feeling; anyone thought out of line is removed immediately. Their accounts aren’t closed but they’re no longer able to post. End of story. Markos Moulitsas does not have to worry about trolls AND HE AND HIS FRIENDS AT DAILY KOS ARE LAUGHING THEIR ASSES OFF AT THE AMATEURS AT NQ.

    This site needs better organisation. Any attempt to promote political views at this site deserves support. The lack of organisation here and the utter confusion amongst those running the show is deplorable.

    Perhaps someone else can take over and turn this site into the formidable site it should be. Then NH would be worried and perturbed by trolls anymore.

    The correct response to trolls is not to ignore them, NH: the correct response is to not let them in the forum in the first place.

    Until this NQ is run properly more and more people will come to regard it as an insignificant trash heap where trolls can come not to undermine the democratic discussion BUT TO JUST HAVE FUN WITH THESE IDIOTS.

    It remains to be seen whether the people running this site will have the integrity to finally come through on their promises and save all the good people here all the undue pain they’ve been suffering.

  • witness08

    Wow,
    looking for integrity that was an interesting note you posted. I feel that I’m the only note of dissent in my circle of friends here in NYC. They were already Obama supporters when I was behind Hillary. I wonder how many of us there are. This site along with “The Confluence” provides me with moral fortitude. Thank you all.

    • KathyNeocon

      You’re not alone witness. :-) We’re everywhere, however it’s not readily apparent since we don’t harass others, invade their blogs and messageboards, threaten or intimade Obama supporters, key their cars, send them nasty e-mails, or otherwise pressure/coerce them into voting for McCain.

      • KathyNeocon

        In other words we’re civilized. It’s Thunderdome with the Obama crowd.

  • http://www.gigglechick.com/erin/blog gigglechick

    also… never EVER feed trolls after midnight. they multiply.

  • Indyvoter

    Here’s a thought.
    Whenever a troll tries to hijack a thread and gets really annoying and tries to somehow kill our resolve to see Obama lose the election, think of one picture or event that symbolizes why you abhor his candidacy and why he must never be president.

    Right now I’m thinking “99 problems but a bitch an’t one.”

  • fooj

    Yes. Projection AND distraction. It’s what keeps the attention off of “The One”…

    As I recall, these are the SAME tactics that Rove used. Funny that.

  • McKatmoon

    I agree with your article, and am guilty of responding; that being said when a troll is imitating a regular NQ poster, I like to see that the remark would at least be addressed,and pointed out as not a NQ supporter.(you know the really ugly ones) that make it appear as if a NQ poster is saying a remark they just don’t say-heavy racial overtones, sexist, etc.
    Anyway, will do my best.

  • http://redhotandbluepolitics.com grlpatriot

    Excellent point, Hampster.

  • yttik

    I’m a feminist and I am supporting McCain/Palin.

    It’s been frustrating watching women, women using sexist language towards Palin. Kind of like they’re pointing a gun at they’re own head. It’s also depressing listening to many so called feminists who can’t even see beyond the partisan politics to at least acknowledge the historic nature of the ticket.

    It really is a fairy tale to believe that one party is evil and the other is good when it comes to womens’ rights. You look at some history and you’ve got Republican women fighting against the Dem party who was in power at the time for the right to vote. You look at Roe v Wade and you’ve got Republican appointed judges who gave it to us. The first female congresswoman was a Republican. The first female presidential candidate nominated at a convention was a Republican. Civil rights are a complex thing, not something easily explained in a good/guy, bad/guy storyline.

  • The Sane John

    Someone mentioned TalkLeft. I used to go there a lot because frankly you could get into a decent discussion and even when the 3 moderators disagreed with you they were reasonably civil about it. Not any more. Jeralyn is running it like a bolt room and she is wielding the bolt harshly. BTD seems cranky lately. TChris, well, he has always seemed to be on a different page, Anyway, it is like a ghost town over there now. They used to average about 200 comments per article and would have to shut down “comments” at that point. I was just there & they are averaging about 10 comments per article. I guess the purge has been successful. Funny thing is even with so few commenters, Jeralyn still “scolds” about a third of them.

  • The Sane John

    As far as Kos running a tight ship – no, he runs a circus.

  • Stewie

    As reported on CNN’s website, today Joe “Bigmouth” Biden made a delicious gaffe. Speaking to the Delaware Blue Hens football team while fondling a football (he should have stuck in his mouth), Biden said that the Blue Hens could “kick Ohio State’s ass.”

    Obama can just say: “Goodbye Columbus.”

    Ohio is now a lock for McCain after Biden’s anti-Buckeye boasting.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      I love it when idiots have to get into the “manly” sports bullshit….as if it makes them seem cooler, or something. How moronic can they be? In a NATIONAL election, you’ve got to stick with the “I’m sure it’ll be an exciting contest” type remarks, in order not to piss off one side or the other.

      Way to turn a swing state red, Joey!

      Hope some smartass runs that tape in a loop in Ohio!!!

  • Kelvin Hearts PUMAs

    The trolls, ie, Larry Johnson, always win because you PUMAs are too gullible. You never use rational thought. Only raw emotions. That’s why you guys are so easily manipulated. Larry places all this anti-Obama crap on this blog to stoke your anger. Yet all of the stories have been debunked without any real evidence. In your irrational state, you can’t determine a credible story from a fake one, because you hate Obama so much. The reason the MSM refuses to report on this garbage is because they’d lose credibility if they did. Larry doesn’t need credibility because of the nature of the internet and a built-in base of pigeons, I mean PUMAs, to disseminate his crap to. When a rational person, such as myself, tries to debate you with facts, you PUMAs behave like spoiled children. Larry sees that and continues to manipulate your emotions with even more unsubstantiated crap. It’s time for you PUMAs to wake up and grow up as well. Stop letting this neocon shill, Johnson to continue control you. Think for yourselves. You don’t have to vote for Obama, but stand on your own and make your own informed decisions. FYI..Hillary is working for the good guys.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/19/clinton-unveils-new-pro-o_n_127852.html

    • WildChild

      LOL you worked on that all week didn’t you?

  • Lipstick LaPig

    I’m getting sick of CNN’s incessant Palin bashing.
    Every time I go there, they are tearing into her.
    Why is Biden escaping scrutiny?

  • Alien

    The overwhelming maority of voters on nov 4 have never been to a blog -much less a political blog.

  • http://www.noquarterusa.net Lin C

    My main concern in this election is the voter fraud issue. I’m not sure we’re going to get even close to accurate. Look at the caucus’. Do the state’s really have a handle on this ???

  • http://www.noquarterusa.net Lin C

    ha!!!