20 years as a “community organizer” code in Chicago for a politician on the take.

As for analyzing case law for you, well, first, give me your interpretation of the case… But I will give you a head start.  Presently, these vote binding laws are the law of the land.

Did you check out criminal conspiracy laws? 

Have you done these three things? No, you haven’t. Your posts would be laughable except you come off like an expert so you have all these people eating out of your hand.

Did you know that it is not illegal to try to convince someone to break the law unless state law explicitly makes it illegal? It my state, for instance, it is only illegal to try to convince someone to commit a felony. You can beg and cajole them all you want to commit a misdemeanor and there’s nothing illegal about that.

Those state laws that supposedly bind a delegate to vote for a certain candidate? Why do you even think they are enforceable? What’s your answer to Democratic Party v. Wisconsin ex rel. LaFollette (450 U.S. 107)?

It’s the internet. Congratulations on fooling a bunch of people.

True, but I thought you may want to file it away for any future use,
for any other reason that may come along  down the road.

I wonder how anyone could read the comments contained in this Part 2 and still not ‘get’ that anything the club wants to do, it can.  Harping on the inequity of club rules completely misses the point.

As for being among allies, well, this personalizing the work has absolutely nothing to do with understanding how the D’s broke laws to obtain the Presidency in 2008, or going after them for breaking these laws.  Indeed, the last time I pointed to this distinction between  complaining people who showed up at caucuses were ‘shut out’ of the process, and actual violations of law; I was accused of not caring that people’s lives were threatened.  (I keep making this distinction about people showing up at caucuses because I maintain, caucuses should have been eliminated because of the categories of citizens excluded from even showing up!)  Imagine, having the conversation about how the Presidency was stolen in 2008, become so sidetracked that it now focused on charges, I didn’t care people were victims of crime; and my retort, victims of crime should call the police and file charges!

I fear people who continue to deflect from the real means to effect change, that is, finding what laws were broken and prosecuting the lawbreakers; have a vested interest in the status quo.

jbjd,

thank you for all your hard work!!!

If you don’t know about the following info, I hope you can use it.

-  
 
I just saw this comment following an AP article ‘doing damage control re Obama  
being a Muslim’:  
 

“Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court….  
 
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.  
 
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.  
 
He owes her big time.  
 
All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard.  
 
It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn’t it?  
 
The American people mean nothing any longer.  
 
It’s all about payback time for those that compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there. We should be getting so sick of all of this nonsense.  
 
The USA has finally become the laughing stock of the world.”

Since I have been involved with election reform for over 7 years now, I can assure you that the caucus fraud is absolutely relevant.

What we discovered in our investigative work these past 7 years is that there are already laws on the books that should help prevent such behavior during the elections process, but the laws are simply not being enforced.  Literally 100′s of election reform advocates have tried and failed to get the judicial system to do their jobs when we present them with irrefutable evidence that election laws have been violated and should be prosecuted.

However, the problem is not so much “ignorance” but “corruption” of the entire system, from the legislature to the judiciary.  A good example of judicial misconduct was shown back in 2006 when the videotaped evidence I presented to the county prosecutor clearly showing election officials stating that they counted the votes in private prior to the 2004 Presidential Recount in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, which was a clear violation of Ohio election law. 

Here’s an article I wrote about the trial and its outcome and the questions that arose as a result of this case coming to trial:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_kathleen_070130_the_story_behind_the.htm

However, even though the women were convicted, they were later held not accountable by a questionable judge brought in several months after the convictions and basically let them off the hook due to some irrelevant legal issue, which had nothing to do with the evidence or the subsequent conviction.  These women were set free without ever having to serve time for violating the law.

The judge who set them free, without ever reading about the case and who, herself, was under a cloud of a number of  questionable decisions was being investigated.