RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Racist Blame begins even before he’s lost

Prejudice among Dems may cost Obama votes

From David Paul Kuhn at Politico

Truly I expect it.  My wife has called me a racist twice over the past few months, many a cheeto has called me a racist and now a Yahoo study confirms that many of us who do not support The One™, are indeed “prejudiced”.

In a report sure to spark a national conversation on race, an AP-Yahoo News study reported Saturday that white prejudice could be a significant enough factor to undermine Barack Obama’s bid to be the first black president of the United States.

The AP-Yahoo study concluded that white Democratic racism may cause 2.5 percent of voters to “turn away from Obama because of his race,” roughly the margin of George W. Bush’s victory over John F. Kerry in 2004.

The AP-Yahoo study found that one-third of white Democrats cited a negative adjective when describing blacks and, of those, just 58 percent said they planned to back Obama. For example, AP reported that more than a quarter of white Democrats agreed that “if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites.” Four in 10 white independents agreed, while a quarter described blacks as “violent.”

White Democratic supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton were almost twice as likely as Obama’s primary supporters to cite a negative adjective in describing blacks — a finding consistent with trends in earlier polling. Only 59 percent of Clinton’s white Democratic supporters wanted Obama to be president.

The report may now begin a conversation on race, one notably absent considering the historic nature of Obama’s bid — and his own call for such a conversation in a speech delivered after racially charged remarks from his longtime pastor Jeremiah Wright emerged during the primary season. Just last month Obama accepted the Democratic nomination on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech.*

Hello!  I’m sure there are people on all sides not supporting Obama for racial reasons.  I met some while canvassing for Hillary last spring and it turned my stomach.  But I also think that many of his supporters are in the same group as this study quotes.  I think that supporting Obama makes them feel a little better about their 50 odd years of racist hatred.

When will someone do a study of the real reasons so many of us distrust his lying ass?  When will they call and ask me about my absolute distaste for one who’s only real concern is himself?

*Did not Dr. King say he dreamed of the day when a man would be judged on the quality of his character rather than the color of his skin?  Well folks, that predjudiced side of me thinks we’d never have heard an Obama speech at the 2004 Convention had not John Kerry wanted to attrack a more “diverse” audience.  Wait.  Maybe I am a racist.  I even mention that he’s only where he is because of the color of his skin not the quality of his character.

Oh but of course I know the real reason for a study like this now.  It is to play the race card.  To once more tickle white guilt and see if a few more dems won’t vote for The One™ just so they can be sure not to feel guilty like the rest of us poor racist trash.

I almost forgot the plug for the Hampster Cage where I wrote this.
Partizane.com

  • NewHampster

    How about asking the right questions on a poll. There is no good answer.

    • http://www.TheOtherDemocrats.com FloridaEx-Dem

      They’re already making excuses. The Randi Rhodes board is rife with racism – in the other direction. And if you do NOT support ‘The One’, then clearly you’re a racist – at least that’s the view of more than one of the moderators, as well as the general membership. There is a moderator there that does nothing but throw ‘racist’ (and chickenhawk) at anyone who does not agree with him. This is a person in a position of responsibility???

      The thuggery and bully-politics of Obama and his Obots has made this one of the most disgusting political races ever. Common sense and civility is out the window.

      I’m glad I’m no longer a Democrat.

      • Denise

        Everyone listen. If you believe Obama violated the Logan act go to this link. It’s so easy to voice your concern. We have set up this petition with (www.rallycongress.com).

        http://www.rallycongress.com/americansentinel/1223/a-call-for-hearings-into-senator-barack-obamas-violation-of-the-logan-act/

        Note: use the “send for free” option.

        • athy

          Denise-
          Thanks again.
          I am cross-posting your link

          • http://www.stateofdisbelief.wordpress.com stateofdisbelief

            Well fine then. As long as he loses. Who cares at this point. Racism has become a meaningly word post-Obama.

            • http://www.stateofdisbelief.wordpress.com stateofdisbelief

              oooopps…meaninglESS

        • Carol

          I signed the petition the other night.

        • Less

          Way to go – keep posting this link. I spent about 4 hours yesterday posting it around. I will do the same today to keep it from being buried by new posts on other sites. Everyone should do the same. I see the number of people you have sent the emails has increase a bit over a thousand since I first checked yesterday. Way to go Denise and everyone else involved

      • Alice Paul WPB

        I stopped listening to Randi Rhodes when she got thrown out of New York and sent back here to my lovely home in Palm Beach County!

        When she called Hillary something or other. I didn’t even want to know. She used to be such a Clinton supporter back in the day. I guess she drank from the well!!!!!!

      • Obama is a bum

        I’m glad I’m no longer a Democrat.

        I’m glad you are not either. That party was in the driver’s seat a year ago and now they are pathetic. The more people who leave that party the better.

        • KathyNeocon

          You got that right.

        • http://investigatebarackobama.wordpress.com/about/ kat in your hat

          I am staying a democrat so that they will see that a democrat voted republican for president. I will vote for some democrats downticket. Then I will drop the party immediately afterward.

          If Hillary runs again for Senate or President, then I will re-register to vote in my state (NY) for whichever way she runs in 2012, and then I will immediately drop the dem party again, and then vote as independent in future general election.

      • Carol

        I think the race card being played by the extreme left is only going to push more people to vote against The Messiah. They sure didn’t get the hint when they crucified Hillary and then told us to get over it.

        • NoBamaNoWay

          yep; i am so fed up with it. if anything, the completely bogus accusations of racism will harm race relations in this country, and it certainly is harming the demcratic party.

      • Horse with no Name

        I agree 100%.
        I’ve done a lot of volunteer work that has direct benefit to the black community.
        Imagine my horror to discover that simply because I didn’t support obama that I was now labeled a racist.
        My personal values and convictions have taken a major hit this election cycle.
        I am in a profession that will not be affected by a recession OR a depression, I have health insurance, my housing is secure, my oldest daughter graduated from college and my youngest is attending, I know enough people that if IF Roe v. Wade were EVER overturned, my family members could still get an abortion if one was necessary.
        I thought that I was a Democrat because of shared responsibility and my willingness to figure out a way for those who didn’t have to have.
        Imagine how I feel in the party I have called home for many years to be called an elitist or a racist. For the record, I have quit ALL of my volunteer work because of the thugs that surround obama. I see VERY little difference between the republicans that I detested and the democrats who now use the same sleazy kind of tricks.
        I’ll tell you one thing.
        It matters NOT who I vote for in November.
        My family is taken care of either way.
        I guess I belong to the party of “I got mine…fuck you”. And trust me when I say this…it is NOT where I wanted to be…it is where I was driven by the overzealous supporters of obama.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          I feel what you’re saying.

          I am still a registered Democrat, and I’ll vote for someone NOT the Democratic nominee–for the first time EVER after decades of faithful, party line voting–come November. It’ll probably be the Ancient Mariner/Moose Hunter ticket. I WILL hold my nose.

          After November, I may well change my registration to Independent.

          I can’t go all the way over, though.

          What I’d really like is for my party to wake up, realize they’ve FUCKED up, and course-correct.

          I’m not holding my breath, though.

          I’m in a position too, where, no matter what happens, with belt-tightening if need be, we’ll get by. That said, I don’t identify with the party of greed any more than I identify with the party of Kill The Corporations, Kiss Ahmadinejad and Stick Your Tongue in Chavez’s Ear, either.

          I like realistic, pragmatic, strong foreign policy positions, a strong defense, and I like decent national infrastructure as well as dignified social programs for the least of our brethren.

          What party will accomodate me?

          I don’t like the “Fuck you, I got mine” bunch, and I don’t like the dirty feet “Let’s take all the money from t those rich people…maaaahn, and like….give it to the poooooor, like, maaaahn” types either.

          Where the fuck is the MODERATE PARTY? We NEED ONE!!!

          • Ai1een

            Yes – I would like it to be called “THE CENTRIST PARTY”.

            Build it and we will come.

            • Perry Logan

              But I won’t. If you start a centrist party, you will be throwing out all the left-wing PUMAs, like me. :(

              • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

                Oh don’t worry Perry. We will keep you around for entertainment!

        • Nomoredem

          Horse with no name, all recovering democrats feel the same way. I have always supported the party, but when I saw what was happening I changed to unaffliated. Maybe one day they will welcome us back, although I have no ilusions.

      • http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com M. Simon

        The easy way to defuse this is just say I’m a Republican.

        Then watch them get in your face. Then you can laugh at them.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          I’m a Democrat. What I’m not is a socialist, communist or marxist.

          And I am no more impressed by the far far right than I am of the far far left. I despised the extreme wing of both these parties.

        • Vicki
    • carol

      I have it on good authority that 95% of the AA population are going to use “race” as the reason not to vote for McCain/Palin.

      So, I guess that proves only 2.5% White or Hispanics are r*cists while 95% of AA’s are r*cists.

      Now that we have settle that.

      CAROL HAKA :evil:

      • NoBamaNoWay

        it’s true; they practiced total race-based voting in the primaries. if that’s not racism, then whites voting against obama are not racists.

    • carol

      I have it on good authority that 95% of the AA population are going to use “race” as the reason not to vote for McCain/Palin.

      So, I guess that proves only 2.5% White or Hispanics are r*cists while 95% of AA’s are r*cists.

      Now that we have settled that.

      CAROL HAKA :evil:

      • Lochos Vestu

        Excellently put.

        HILLARY ’12!!!

    • carol

      I have it on good authority that 95% of the AA population are going to use “r*ce” as the reason not to vote for McCain/Palin.

      So, I guess that proves only 2.5% White or Hispanics are r*cists while 95% of AA’s are r*cists.

      Now that we have settled that.

      CAROL HAKA :evil:

      • d2d

        Right on, Carol! I can’t help but wonder when AP or Yahoo will host the same study with black voters about their voting preference when it comes to McCain.

        I’m so sick and tired of being labeled a racist by the very people who ARE RACIST toward ME. I’m over it and have no patience for this crap anymore!

        • Ai1een

          I have written Rasmuissen, Gallup, etc.for months (and again just recently) asking them to conduct a poll inquiring if voters would be willing to vote for Colin Powell if he were one of the Presidental nominees.

          I told them that this would serve as an excellent baseline tool in this whole “racism” debate regarding Obama. (I’m sure others suggested this to these pollsters as well.)

          Of course…the polls in America want nothing to do with the truth and they have YET to conduct such a poll.

          This would have been an extremely worthwhile question to have been answered during the primaries between Hillary and Barack, but it remains a useful poll to do to this day considering that this contrived melodramatic racist talk is still rearing its lame head.

          HOW CAN WE EVEN BE HAVING THIS ONE WAY DISCUSSION AND CALL THIS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

          2.5 % Racism in Caucasian Vote
          91%-95% Racism in African American Vote

          Do I wish both of those percentages reflected 0.00%? Yes. But realistically, anthropologically, there is and will always be a certain level of racism in ANY ethnicity. Racism exists in EVERY culture and EVERY ethnicity across our planet Earth. Racism or ethnic prejudice is certainly NOT limited to our country alone – it is the cause of most wars across the globe in our present day and throughout history despite the guilt trip Barack Obama put on America during his incipid race speech that was given to distract everyone from his own RACIST actions.

          2.5%… 2.5%? Really?!! Frankly, that’s DAMN good White America! BRAVO to you! Considering where this country stood just 35 years ago – that is INCREDIBLE that we have come such a long way in conquering racist prejudice in what is considered, from a historical perspective, the blink of an eye.

          Now – 90+% Racist vote in the AA Community?

          Hmmm. Perhaps YAHOO needs to re-address their definition of racism.

          • NoBamaNoWay

            hush. you’re not supposed to say anything about that.

            • Irish1139

              What surprises me most is that there aren’t enough intelligent AAs to wait for a great candidate to come along. I guess they will vote for anybody as long as they are black.

              There are many wonderful AAs working long and hard for America that deserve to be president. Obama is not one of them. This is a man who cries because he has to pay college fees. I can’t understand why that would be a problem when you have had the opportunities that most people never get to attend two prestigious colleges.

              I know there are kids out there who would love to have those college fees after getting a great education.

              Always has his hand out. I can only imagine what he would expect as president.

              • Vicki

                If he didn’t want to end up with a high college loan balance, he shouldn’t have gone to an expensive college. A community college or state college will provide a fine education if you apply yourself. Actions have consequences, supposedly. These elitists are driving me over the edge. Who do they think they are??

    • KathyNeocon

      That’s the point. Jimmy the questions so out come answers they can spin as racism. This is another scare tactic to coerce us into voting for Obama. Brand us racists if we don’t vote for him.

      Not working.

    • kbdabear

      http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/260085

      Media Caught Fabricating White Racists?

      A quote attributed to Sandra Cichon, a private citizen, is spreading across the internet as a living example of White Racism. Did a reporter put words in this woman’s mouth?

      An article in the St. Petersberg Times, quotes Cichon as having said, “I can’t imagine having a black president . . .”

      In a phone interview Saturday, Sandra Cichon of Spring Hill, Florida denied that she ever spoke with any pollster or reporter concerning Obama or about anything regarding race. Cichon was taken by surprise when phoned by this reporter, and she was not aware that she had been quoted in any newspaper.

      The September 15, 2008 article Black ‘issue’ hangs over presidential polls by Adam Smith of the St. Petersburg Times Political states:

      A pollster calling Sandra Cichon, a 60-year-old Democrat from Spring Hill, would hear her identify herself as an undecided voter. But is she really?

      “I can’t imagine having a black president, and I think he’s inexperienced,” she told a reporter recently, eventually acknowledging she was leaning unenthusiastically toward McCain. “I don’t think we (Democrats) have a chance to be in the White House with Obama.”

      Many analysts wonder how many voters answering polls hide their racial biases or mislead survey-takers about their real preferences.

      The article fails to name the pollster who claimed to have called Cichon. When asked during my phone interview, Cichon denied speaking to any pollster on the phone.

      Cichon explained that the only time she spoke with a reporter was in August when she went to vote in the county commission races. She said that he (the reporter) seemed nice and she gave him a catalogue for gift baskets.

      Cichon is quoted in an August 27, 2008 article in the St. Petersburg Times, Russell, Mitchell, Hackworth win congressional primaries, by Rita Farlow, Stephanie Garry and John Frank, Times Staff Writers.

      Many Democratic voters said they were unimpressed with the quality of the candidates.

      “I don’t know one from the other,” said Sandra Cichon of Spring Hill.

      Sandra Cichon shows up in another August 27, 2008 St. Petersburg Times article Dismal voter turnout in Hernando by Barbara Behrendt and John Frank. Times staff writer, John Frank, was a reporter on both August 27th articles.

      Some Democratic voters said they found the experience largely unsatisfying based on the quality of congressional candidates on their ticket. . . .Sandra Cichon, 60, cast a ballot at Spring Hill United Church of Christ. She left disappointed because she couldn’t vote in the hotly contested commission races as a registered Democrat.

      “I wouldn’t even have come if I knew,” she said.

      In a phone call to Times Political Editor, Adam Smith, who authored the article in question, Smith said that he had the utmost confidence in the reporter, John Frank. Smith said that Frank was the reporter who actually spoke with Cichon. Smith said it is understandable that Cichon wouldn’t want to admit over the phone to making that statement, but “polls all over are showing that people are not hesitant in stating that they won’t vote for a black person.”

      The progressive DoubleTake is the blog for the Alliance of White Anti-Racists Everywhere – Los Angeles. AWARE-LA paraphrases the same September 15, 2008 article Black ‘issue’ hangs over presidential polls, by Adam C. Smith. But notice that something has been added to the Cichon quote.

      Later in the article Sandra Cichon, a 60-year-old Democrat from Spring Hill, who originally identified herself to a pollster as an undecided voter, recently told a reporter, “I can’t imagine having a black president, and I think he’s inexperienced.”

      Sandra then asked the reporter if she would like a fresh batch of “Obama Waffles.”

      Sandra Cichon was asked during my interview today if she had asked the reporter if he would like a fresh batch of “Obama Waffles” ?

      Cichon responded, “Why would I ask a reporter about waffles? This is crazy. I never spoke to any reporter about Obama. I’m going right down to the St. Petersburg Times and demand a retraction!

      Times Editor, Adam Smith was asked if he had heard that Cichon had offered the reporter “Obama Waffles?” Smith said he was not aware of that quote.

  • Anna

    I wonder when they’ll do a big study about sexism, so we can start a “national conversation” about that.

    • NewHampster

      Sexism is a figment of the imagination of 51% of the population. Nothing real there to study.

      • Lipstick LaPig

        Obama got the nomination specifically because of his race.
        And many white people will vote for him because he is not white.
        A tiny, inconsequential sampling will not vote for a non white.
        This is a very advantageous time to be a minority in America.

        • richasis

          “This is a very advantageous time to be a minority in America.”

          really? where have you been for the last thirty years?

        • Obama is a bum

          Agreed.

          • KathyNeocon

            It’s a dangerous time for any race, thanks to race-baiting Obama and his sect of worshippers who are racists, thugs, and rabble-rousers.

            If you’re black and don’t vote for Obama, you’re a traitor, a “whitey”, etc. If you’re white and don’t vote for him, you’re racist. As a white person I say let the blacks who are racists and love Obama get riled up, riot, and tear up their neighborhoods when Obama loses. Just brilliant. They’re only hurting themselves. Of course then it will be the government’s job to come in and clean up their neighborhoods. Whatever.

            • Obama is a bum

              If you’re black and don’t vote for Obama, you’re a traitor, a “whitey”, etc. If you’re white and don’t vote for him, you’re racist.

              You are letting the race baiters define this. I don’t even think they believe this themselves but use it as a tool to manipulate. I am not so easy to manipulate and it scares the hell out of them.

              • beebop

                Put a McCain sign in your yard. No one knocks on your door. When they call, tell them you’re blind. And undecided. Don’t fall for it.

        • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

          Yeah so what if hes a socialist jihad loving pig.

  • Anna

    Oh. And I heard there was a poll to measure the support of McCain vs. Colin Powell as president. Powell won hands down. Surely if there is so much racism…

    • Jules

      Prior to hearing that Powell may be a closet supporter of Obama, I would have voted for Powell in split second. I don’t really know where he truly stands on Obama. If he did support Obama that would show such poor judgment on his part that he would lose my hypothetical vote.

      • http://www.TheOtherDemocrats.com FloridaEx-Dem

        I’m with you, Jules. I’d have voted for him too (if I didn’t have Hillary). But it’s a moot point. And of course, if he supports Obama, it will show he’s had yet one more serious lapse in judgment. Not as bad as his Iraq lapse, but still, very, very serious.

        If he does support the Big O, then it tells me he has a major problem in ‘reading’ people and their value systems.

        • Judy L. NC

          No way, Jose! Powell is a war criminal IMO and should be shipped to The Hague with Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz et al.

          • Dan

            You’re an idiot.

            • androo

              no, its true. he should be for lying at the u.n. pre iraq.

            • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

              No she’s not. I could bring up links right now where Powell admitted he was forced to lie to the UN about those weapons of mass destruction. He has repented but that is no excuse for lying to America.

              • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

                And that’s what happens when you are trying to protect your son’s cushy job.

      • Obama is a bum

        There is your racism — Powell is a Republican who will vote for an unqualified black with sleazy connections.

        • AF catfish

          Powell is not voting for Obama.

      • armymom

        I had heard this awhile back too, but have never found any evidence that Powell supports BO. I think it was a rumor started by BOs minions to prop him up on foreign policy.

    • scorbs

      Many people forget that one reason people voted Bush was Colin Powell and Condi Rice.

      • scorbs

        Or two reasons.

    • MrMike

      Powell lost my respect when he held that vial of Bush’s stash up at the U N and said we had to invade Iraq.

      • Dee

        Powell lost my respect with the My Lai incident.

        Inside DCers call him The Sponge. He has no core values – just does what is asked of him by his boss(es).

        Now that I think about it Obama is Sponge, Jr.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Powell and McCain are about the same age, too–maybe a year apart.

      Funny though, you don’t hear ANYONE calling Powell an old man, or making Altzheimer’s jokes about him, do ya?

      I find that …… interesting.

      No one suggests that Powell is “too old.”

      Yet McCain catches shit constantly!

      • wonderwoman

        Powell looks much younger than McCain. I thought Powell was in his 60′s until you said it. AA’s tend to look ten years younger as well. But intelligent people all know that those years in the Hilton put 20 years of age on John McCain.

  • jdona

    Over at hillaryclintonforum.net, they posted this and asked that we get the word out and keep it going so people will know we are being played like a bunch of idiots. I think most of us here already know that, and we are aware of the concern trolls, but here it is anyhow. Enjoy reading what the Obama Butts really think of us and Hillary.

    http://www.lynettelong.com/my_weblog/2008/09/what-they-reall.html

    • CJ

      This article made me so sick that I could not even finish reading it. It sounded like my old boss who was so condescending, he was pathetic. He’d always walk away from saying something stupid like he was the victor while I was hiding behind a partition gagging. This type of patting someone on the shoulder, consoling, whatever will not work. In fact, hopefully, this will lose votes for Obama. Women can see through this crap.

      • Judy L. NC

        Me too…PUMA!

        • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

          These pathetic talking points and tactics have been used all along by the Ozombies. My response to them has been that I respected them more when they were verbally attacking us HRC supporters(!) . . . that their new-found love for HRC and slimey maneuverings only make them look desperate and phony. (I was banned from the DK site after posting this.)

          The condescending tone of the above article reminds me of the film THELMA & LOUISE which showcased perfectly the sexist & patronizing tone some men adopt when trying to win over recalcitrant women. Just like those men in the film, the Ozombie’s really haven’t a clue! Case in point: Remember when one of the detectives tells Thelma’s husband to be nice and sweet to her when she calls in because “women like that shit”! Yeah, well once Thelma heard her husband’s “nice and sweet” voice she hung up the phone immediately because she new something was up.

          This is the way I feel whenever an Ozombie tries to win me over—suspicious and insulted! It’s really laughable that they think they can fool us into voting for Obama. The level of immaturity in the Obama camp never fails to astound me.

          • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

            Sorry, I meant the above link to Lynnettelong.com, not “the above article.”

    • Obama is a bum

      The typical Obama supporter is a programmed idiot. They can’t really think for themselves and must be told what to do. That is why they enjoy Obama telling them what to eat, drive, set thermostats, inflate tires, etc. It is like training animals for a circus.

      • KathyNeocon

        LOL!! So true.

    • MrMike

      Is this snark? They can’t be serious.

      • miriam

        My opinion, too. It’s snark, but very subtle snark, which makes it even more hilarious. The bit about the “wobbly” Obama campaign finally gives it away.

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        I’m telling you, they used ALL of these talking points and tactics on DK and MYDD right after HRC dropped out. Really!! It was quite hilarious and insulting then as it is now.

    • Carol

      This link is so full of BS. Do they really think by using this BS tactic will change our minds? I don’t think so. What idiots they are.

      I liked the statement “Obama’s wobbly campaign.”

  • notodisenfranchisement

    I believe this is what’s going on – yes, it’s an excuse if BO loses…but it’s also a setup for his next run – if it’s a close loss for BO, he and his bot army will say: oh in 2008 everyone was a racist; in 2012, we are now evolved.

    Let’s stop Obama now, hopefully, in a landslide, so he does not re-emerge in 2012. Myself and many millions, I’m sure, cannot take anymore of this man.

    • NewHampster

      Aw come on. Don’t you want to here him on the teevee every day for the next 4 years? That’s after wright does the invocation at the inaugural.

      • lark

        Who knows, maybe god cursed america by sending us Zerobama to be with us for the next 30 years.

    • catherine

      It’s over for Obama. He won’t run again for POTUS or anything else. Rezko does’nt get sentenced until late October.

      Once the election is over the MSM will start to gradually reveal what the rest of us have known for months. Obama’s a complete fraud.

      • lark

        Give me more of that. I hope that when and if Rezco is sentenced in October, the barrage of 527 on the subject would be enough to sink Zoetoro into the 30s. Dreaming.

    • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

      I would not vote for Obama in 2012 either, because he still will have never done nything in Washington except run for President. My hope for Obama. Do something with your life and come back again in 2016.

    • Obama is a bum

      If Obama loses here I think he is done. I don’t think the country wants to go through this crap again. After all the money Obama has raised and all of the billions of media hype he has gotten, if he can’t win it now he never will.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      He will NOT RUN AGAIN.

      If we can stop him now, he’s done.

      Michelle has spoken, you see. She said “We’re only doing this ONCE.”

      It sounded like she meant it, too.

      I think she’s the one who’s Large And In Charge at that house!

  • http://www.liberalrapture.com/ John

    When Obama was ahead by 8 points no one was a racist. Suddenly racism is an issue.

    • QUEENIE

      REMEMBER PLEASE……..OBAMA IS ALSO WHITE..

      Born to a white woman

      raised by his “white grandparents”

      Schooled with mostly White children in a very very affluent prep school.

      who is kidding who here..

      • Obama is a bum

        He has always claimed to be black, obviously for the advantages it brings.

    • Obama is a bum

      It is the race card stupid.

    • AF catfish

      I am an assholist. I have a prejudice against assholes.

    • WMCB

      John, he went down in the polls. Evidently, all of those people have been COMPLETELY UNAWARE for the last 19 months that he is black!!

      Wow, they JUST found out! OMG! He’s black! They didn’t know this! This changes everything!

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        They adjusted the contrast and color on their TV’s maybe??? So we’ll see this scenario play out in homes across the land????

        Fred: OH. MY. GAWD!!! Marge, quick!!! Come look at the TEEVEE!!! LOOOK!!!! Is that…..could that BEEEEEEEE…(gasp!!!!)…a ****BLACK***** man!!!!?????

        Marge: (Clutches pearls) Why, Fred…I do believe you are right!! WHY didn’t I take this TEEVEE to the repairman SOONER???? And I’ve told ALL OUR FRIENDS we’d VOTE for him!!!

        Fred: And we have his SIGN in our yard!! And his BUMPERSTICKER on our car!!! Oh, what WILL we do??

        Marge: Oh, I know–we’ll just….uh…NOT VOTE FOR HIM!! Secretly, so no one will KNOW what a terrible mistake we’ve made!!!!!!!!

        Fred: Yes, THAT’s the ticket!! Because he’s BLACK…and we DIDN’T KNOW!!!

        Marge: Yes, Indeedy, Fred! He IS Black, and we’re WHITE, so of course, we HAVE to just HATE him for that reason….and of course… We DIDN’T KNOW!!!

        AND…..SCENE!

        Hey…it could happen!!!

        It’s incredibly unlikely, but it COULD happen!

        It’s probably easier for the Kool Aid Kids to deal with, than the reality that their candidate, oh….SUCKS?

  • jmm

    When are they going to do a poll that shows how many people aren’t voting for him because he is unqualified. Or one that shows how many people are voting for him because he is black. This is all getting so annoying, I’m glad this will be over soon.

    • Nader rox!

      thank for writing what i’ve been screaming out loud here! exactly!

      HELLO!

      • texdem

        From the original article posted on yahoo, not politico’s shorter version. (i tried to post it, it did not post) They try to hide the fact that we won’t vote for BO because he is unqualified.

        Race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama. Doubts about his competency loom even larger, the poll indicates. More than a quarter of all Democrats expressed doubt that Obama can bring about the change they want, and they are likely to vote against him because of that.

        Three in 10 of those Democrats who don’t trust Obama’s change-making credentials say they plan to vote for McCain

        • Judy L. NC

          Goes back to Big Dawg’s Candidate X who can’t deliver. . .

        • Vicki

          So over 25% of Dems won’t vote for 0bama because he is unqualified, but when 2.5% of them won’t vote for him because of race, the headline screams, RACISM??

          OK I get it.

    • Jules

      Because according to some “unqualified” is code word for racist!

      • Ferd McBerfle

        I guess “unfit” is also racist. I wonder what term we can use that won’t be spun and stretched beyond its breaking point into a racist term.

        • bemused

          When you’re talking to people who are chronically defensive, whatever you say that could be taken personally, will be. The answer is to change the defensiveness, not adapt to it. That only spreads the problem. Don’t let people creep into your words, for heaven’s sake.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        Oh. My. GAWD!!!

        Are you telling me that it’s just RACISM that keeping me from my dream of becoming an ASTRONAUT…and not the fact that I’m old, fat, and…er, otherwise UNQUALIFIED?

        :lol:

      • Eden

        Will make it more interesting when he is found “ineligible” to be President.

        And I’m not talking about Berg. I have thought for a long time that GOP has the goods on him.

    • Obama is a bum

      A lot of people will not admit they are voting for him because he is black. If you question many people though they don’t have a clue as to why they support him and will defend all of his flaws — at that point it is easy to determine what their motives are and some will give in and finally admit it.

  • fif

    I feel no guilt whatsoever for voting against this lying, unethical, inexperienced hypocrite.

    See race in any of those adjectives?

  • kcfromtx

    So, did Kerry lose because of richism? Gore because of boreism?
    Did Alan Keyes lose the Il senate race because of racism? He was more black than barfo, so he lost.
    I thought we was gonna lose because of elitism? They better make up their minds which excuse to use.

  • pal3

    I’m starting to believe Obama is the antichrist or the person who will usher in the antichrist.

    • wonderwoman

      I’ve considered BO could be the antichrist-but the Left Behind people say he is not. They say we won’t even know, who the antichrist is.

  • Faye

    Over at “countusout.wordpress.com/” they have “End The Accusations Of Racism: Vote Against Obama’s Unqualified White Side.”

    • NewHampster

      Love it

    • notodisenfranchisement

      LOL. That’s great.

    • LookingForwardTo2012

      LOL, that would make a great bumper sticker!!

    • yttik

      LOL, I love that. Yes, I’m voting against Obama’s unqualified white side.

    • miriam

      heh

  • ms mississippi

    Hey, ya’ll. Check out this link. It’s an event scheduled in PA this Friday (day of the 1st debate) to launch national effort to defeat Obambi. Another PUMA in action!

    http://freemenow.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/democracy-in-suffrage/#comment-343

  • Shiloh

    If believing that blacks, if they would “try harder” could be as well off as whites makes one a racist then I guess I’m a racist. In fact, the way I see it the only way one could not agree with that statement is if one believes blacks are genetically inferior and can never compete on a level playing field. And here I thought “that” was the racist attitude.

    • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

      Hey Shilloh. I totally disagree with you. You take the hardest working black kid from the ghetto with a father who has split and a mother on crack, and he or she will never accomplish as much as George W. Bush did the day he was born. Life is unfair, and part of us being Democrats is that we recognize that fact.

      • beverly leslie

        What about a hard working white kid from a trailor park with no father and a mother on coke? Or does that only happen to black kids?

        Yes, life is unfair and no matter what anyone does to try to remedy it, it will always be unfair.

        • bemused

          May I suggest, stay out of anecdotal evidence (“I knew someone who…”), and find some statistics of which there are many sources, on demographic generalizations like “a ghetto kid with a single mother.”
          This is why:
          First every anecdote can be met with a counter one, so it gets you entertained but no further in prediction.
          Second, the statistics, the aim is to sort large groups, to smooth out the individual differences of anecdotes, into categories that hopefully have a predictive value, like race, gender, income, etc. The intuitive predictors don’t always turn out to be the best, so even though we feel pretty safe in thinking ghetto-drugs-single parent-race-income are big predictors of success, we might be surprised at which was best. Don’t know if this is still true but for the longest time the best predictor of healthiness in a family was mother’s education level (or if no mother, the primary caregiver). Not race. Income I believe was second best.

        • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

          But Bevwerly, as Democrats we do not accept things as they are without trying to make things better. That goes for the black child and the white child.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          Or a fat kid from a poor, lower class, white trashy, broken home with a stepfather who beat his mama (who loved a drink and loved to gamble)…you know, like Bill (nee Blythe) Clinton?

      • kgirl1028

        both of you sound like a bunch of stereotyping fools. First of all, Frank Davis did not lie to obama, whites are cool to wards highly educated blacks, but the minute you try to again real power, they we will turn on you. The problem with obama is that the only thing he took away from Frank Davis was a distrust of whites namely his grand parents and he did not take away the important part. His grand father also did him a great diservice by overriding the one decent thing his father would ever teach him “you can’t half step you have to be the best” However I have parents that were born during segregation and I can tell you that, the only way blacks can make it, and be respected is if they ten times better than whites. The playing field for blacks are not leveled, no matter what you think, being black is like being a woman, you don’t know how it feels unless you are one. Blacks will never be allowed to succeed as easily as whites, nor are their glaring mistakes over looked, the problem is where as my parents were 30 and 34 when was born, and much older than my peers parents, and taught me this lesson modern black parents have not taught their children that. Just so you know Shiloh beyonce Knowls her father was very successful and grew up in a six bedroom house, and that was before destiny’s child. so don’t tick me off with the “try harder bull” but cause there are plenty of successful blacks, they just can’t boot leg and get mega rich like the Kennedy’s we have to be legit.

        And to JJ. what the hell? This is why I don’t like obama’s nomination. because democrats really believe that blacks are in some way deficient and need white peoples help to succeed. So every time you help a black person out you get an extra star in your crown. Blacks succeeded long before white democrats and they will succeed without white democrats, ghetto or no. My grandparents may not have been crack heads but my father get an RN license and did quite well for us and he grew up in public housing, and his daddy was at home. My mother graduated from a historically black college with a BS degree and she grew up with an emotional distant father, went to segregated blacks public schools, and grew up in a house with a hole in the floor and she earned a bachelors degree. My parents had parents who didn’t graduate from high school, but all of their children went ot college. blacks have stop succeeding because black people lost their sense of community. The very stereotypical notion that some how we are a week an wilting group of people that just NEED your help is simply not true. what we need is what other mistreated look down apon ethnic grous that have come to this country, community. The irish, germans, italians, the chinese, and many more ethnic groups have all done this. instead we follow blacks like al sharpton into the whole of victimization act. Blacks waste far too much time and energy worried about what whites have done to them or think of them. And what they seem not to realize is when they take what you finally give them, it feeds into the moronic impressions of us, that are above. They forgot that the best revenge is doing well. and they also forgot you don’t get anything for free, only the price for this is not monetary, but how people perceive you. and obama getting a nomination that he did not earn does not help that impression. I admire bill clinton beyond his faults because I like people who over come odds, it’s the same reason i admire Dr ben Carson because they give single mothers hope. Obama who is not succeeding on his own steam, does give blacks hope, what it gives them is an unrealistic expectation of what it really takes to succeed.

        • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

          Hi KGirl,

          I appreciate your point.

        • bemused

          I appreciate your post, especially

          The very stereotypical notion that some how we are a week an wilting group of people that just NEED your help is simply not true.

          and this:

          The irish, germans, italians, the chinese, and many more ethnic groups have all done this. instead we follow blacks like al sharpton into the whole of victimization act. Blacks waste far too much time and energy worried about what whites have done to them or think of them.

          Actually, I think this is the point made above, that could be summed up as “if AAs try harder they would succeed.” Others (Irish, Germans, Indians, etc.)were put down. But they didn’t have Sharptons to lead them into victimization, they didn’t focus on the past, they didn’t feel they needed a special boost, they didn’t put community energy into retribution instead of building. And they didn’t succeed in one generation of busting their buns either, usually. Even now, some people in these other groups are as bad off as any AA. Just my opinion, but I think AAs aren’t helped by the Sharptons and Wrights and Meeks of the world who build dungeons of resentment and encourage people to get in. It creats a ghetto of the mind and a bigger burden to overcome in the world. Where are the AA leaders who have looked at successful AAs and said, this is what they did, how can their stories be used to help others?

        • Vicki

          Hi KGirl,

          I am a white Republican woman and I heartily wish for your success and happiness in life. I’m sure you have had and will have setbacks, we all do. I believe you can do whatever you set your sights on. Don’t let the jerks get you down, because as you said, it happens to women.

          You go KGirl!

          Aside from that, I think 0bama’s problem is that he was spoiled rotten. He was never told no, never frustrated from getting what he wanted. That’s why he is so angry that McCain and Palin won’t just roll over and play dead. He’s entitled to the presidency, in his mind, and they are bad for opposing him.

      • Carol

        Life is unfair, and part of us being Democrats is that we recognize that fact.

        Yes we do recognize that, but we also recognize that by not playing the victim and working hard, we overcome our childhood situations.

      • athena

        My african american neighbor living in his million dollar home suceeded with just that kind of background and is now raising his family of 4 daughters and a nephew to be successful Americans.

    • MrMike

      A family member taught in a poor rural school district that had a large proportion of black kids. The roof leaked and the campus was in such disrepair that had it been an apartment complex the landlord would have been in jail, unless he was a friend of Barry. How can you try harder when it’s cold and damp and you have to sit still? Are you a racist?

      • Kat5

        Somehow, generations of Americans managed to learn reading and writing, etc., in rather primitive, one-room schoolhouses with virtually no heat or textbooks, and certainly no plumbing. Many of these students, likely a majority, were needed as labor by their families during planting and harvest, and so their education was sporadic, often short-lived. These students had to make a real effort to get whatever education their environment afforded. The best were undoubtedly fueled by both parental encouragement and a desire to learn, by far the most important ingredients in childhood education, and the most likely to be lacking in American inner cities these days.

    • Obama is a bum

      Blacks are far more successful in sports than whites. They dominate professional football and basketball, are whites not trying as hard in sports?

    • Tristan

      “if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites.”

      Look at the question! It’s meaningless. You can infer absolutely nothing from a yes or no answer.

      NO – because black people are inferior
      NO – because black people face insurmountable economic barriers
      YES – because black people are lazy and need to work harder
      YES – because the US rewards hard work from anyone, black or white

      I’m sure there are other Yes and No answers that others can think of.

    • wonderwoman

      You think all blacks should try harder Shiloh? Perhaps you are racist. Because many Blacks have more degrees than whites.

  • McKatmoon

    If he loses, we get blamed, no matter what, I mean why on earth when these foolish,downright dull individuals who will accuse half of the population of racism, because their leader proclaimed it, ever take any personal responsibility in creating a type of racism that never reared it’s head before. There is outright racism, and we all know what that looks like. This is manufactured racism, for the sake of self promotion. Yet what I fear is it will have a backlash of true racism, not only between the obvious, white and black, but also between black and blacks who didn’t support O being cast aside entirely in a cultural way.
    Manufactured racism, generates an impact against actual racism that will harm all of us, no matter the melanin. There will also be a biased against political affiliations, o supporters against non- o supporters, which has been taken a notch above liberal hating and neo-con bashing. Hell, I admit I already have political prejudice against o supporters, but that doesn’ take a leap into racism. Anyone who would promote that ideology, should take that judgmental, finger and point it back at themselves. Screaming fire doesn’t make it so, there has to be some smoke or some flames. Same goes with racism, just because you yell about it, doesn’t make it an actual act of racism.

    • Obama is a bum

      If he loses, we get blamed,

      If Obama loses I won’t blame anyone but I will give everyone the credit who voted for McCain.

      • PJ

        Whoohoo!

    • PJ

      False cries about racism is getting very, very tiring.

      I still think Bill needs to kick someone’s ASS about being called a racist. I can’t say how much that PISSED ME OFF.

      • Vicki

        I agree. Bill Clinton may be a lot of things but racist is not one of them. He hasn’t a racist bone in his body.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Who’s “we?”

      You know they’ll poll the bejesus out of people, exit, post-exit, and beyond, and “we” won’t know how it shakes out until it’s over.

      If it is close, then they’ll try to identify the “group” that didn’t go along and get along to put the BoyKing upon the throne. Will it be those pesky JEWS? Those hot-blooded Hispanics? Those inscrutable ASIANS? Those fatassed, b-word white women? Who will take the blame?

      If it’s a landslide rejection, will they try to claim the nation is racist? Or will they examine the flaws of the candidate?

      Did they reject Dukakis because he was Greek? Had bushy eyebrows? Was SHORT?

      Or because he didn’t BRING IT?

      It will be interesting to see how the post-election is covered this time around, that’s for sure.

  • JM08

    White people are scared to admit to not voting for Obama, because they know the first thing that will enter a pollsters mind is they must be a racist, ecspecially if they are a democrat.

    Obamas support among white democrats is defiantly VASTLY overstated in polls.

    Can you imagine, your white, your democrat, and you tell someone your voting for mccain, the first thing that is going to pop in their heads is, oh hes a racist, so many white people ecspecially democrats tell pollsters they are voting obama, but in the privacy of the voting booth or their mail in ballot they will vote mccain.

    Thats why if the republicans have at a tie in any state, you know its going red …

    I say republicans instead of mccain, because if mccain does not begin fighting back he will be pressured to step down for “health reasons”.

    I know for a fact a plan has already been put into place to replace mccain if needed. McCain has until the 1st debate to start acting like he wants to win this election, if he does not respond like a fighter in the next week, say hello to palin/jindal

    • RepublicanChick

      I know for a fact a plan has already been put into place to replace mccain if needed. McCain has until the 1st debate to start acting like he wants to win this election, if he does not respond like a fighter in the next week, say hello to palin/jindal

      Stop listening to Karl Rove. I’m not sure whom you’re talking about, but I have since passed this on to the appropriate Republican channels. After all, we’re all entitled to a good laugh.

    • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

      This is very much the way I feel in my own family. I was very active for Kerry (The scumbag)in 2004. So, why else would I be for McCain now?

      But Palin gives us some cover. When my wife and I heard that McCain chose Palin, the first thing we thought was, “Well, if your not for McCain and Palin you must be a sexist”.

    • Kat5

      This is exactly what a McCain pollster said on NPR last week. You can assume that McCain is actually about 6-8 points ahead of any stated poll numbers, due to the race-inhibitory factor.

    • Carol

      know for a fact a plan has already been put into place to replace mccain if needed. McCain has until the 1st debate to start acting like he wants to win this election, if he does not respond like a fighter in the next week, say hello to palin/jindal

      Give us your facts. He is campaigning to win this election. Where have you been?

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        That guy is a troll. Dunno what his agenda is with this particular tack, but he’s an inciter….

      • wonderwoman

        If folks won’t vote for Obama what makes people think they will vote for Jindal?

  • hmmmmmm

    Are the 10% blacks not supporting Obama Uncle Toms then? lol I am so sick of these far, left liberal whites and their white guilt.

    • richasis

      “I am so sick of these far, left liberal whites and their white guilt.”

      they’ve only been at it for forty years…

      • Obama is a bum

        they’ve only been at it for forty years…

        And they show no signs of slowing down. For the majority of white people in this country they have been spoon fed this nonsense for their entire lives. Many such as Sharpton, Jackson, Wright, Phleger, etc. have made good livings off race baiting and have no intentions of letting go. And if Obama is elected it will be entirely on race and it will be a hollow victory since it was essentially handed to him rather than winning it.

        • Tristan

          Mentioning that Jesse Jackson won the SC primary makes you a racist, remember?

          • Obama is a bum

            According to the people who attempt to define it and I just consider the source.

            • Irish1139

              Jesse Jackson ran a good race. I just saw some video of him running for the presidency. I had forgotten what a good looking man he was when he was young. Jesse was doing really well until he got caught on a microphone calling New York hymie town. That ended his race. The jewish people came down pretty hard on him.

              But Jesse ran a successful race. A lot of people voted for Jesse and they weren’t all black.

    • MrMike

      Hmmm … what would you call an Irish voter who doesn’t go for Kennedy or Kerry?

      sober?

      • Carol

        Hmmm … what would you call an Irish voter who doesn’t go for Kennedy or Kerry?

        sober?

        Good one. Keep ‘em coming.

  • JM08

    blacks are defiantly acting like racists in this election cycle. but thats okay because black on white racism is not only allowed its encouraged and appluded.

    by the way the last couple of polls i saw had obamas black support at 96%

    • Kal

      Well, that’s a relief. I was starting to worry that Blacks might also be possibly guilty of racism. But it looks like only 4% are at risk.

    • Obama is a bum

      I have seen it at 99%, if it is coming down then that would be welcome.

      • wonderwoman

        How can 99 percent of blacks be voting for Obama when at least 10 percent are republicans. Obama’s numbers a proped up across the board.

  • Loveharriet

    I will save you the hassel, I am black voting for Mccain and Palin. Oh well I guess I am a happy racist.

    • RepublicanChick

      Harriet:

      You’re an articulate, thought provoking, intelligent, funny, principled, and always ready with a smile.

      This puts you light years ahead of any idiot trying to use the race card against you.

      As for being a racist, this brown chick happily joins the bandwagon.

      • Irish1139

        I think AAs are afraid to say they are not voting for Obama. I don’t believe he has 96% of the AAs. Most probably feel pressure from others to vote for him and so they say they are. But I know too many who are not. It is going to be interesting to see if we can beat the fraud that Obama has built into the votes and elect McCain.

  • RepublicanChick

    If Obama loses because of “racism”, what happens if the Republicans put up someone like Lt. Col Allen West? Bobby Jindal? Well, we’re not going to have much longer to wait. It’s coming to America. The first non-white President of this country is going to be a Republican.

    The race card has nothing to do with racism. It has everything to do with convenience. If it ain’t working, it’s because Barack Obama is black. Could it be it’s because he’s inexperienced, shady, and incapable of stringing together a thought without a teleprompter?

    Can I ask? How the hell do many of these white loonies know the first thing about racism? How do many of these inner city blacks know about racism on a large scale? Not all police officers working in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York are white.

    When a minority or a lefty loon tells you that you’re racist, my response would be “how the hell would you know”?

    Racism in America isn’t just something that happens to black people—it’s happening to whites and other minorities.

    In my lifetime, I will probably not see one candidate running for President that shares my ethnic background. Am I going to cry a river over it? Hell no! After this election cycle, what person in their right mind wants to put themselves or their families through this process?

    Racism in this election is convenient for those that have nothing to say, offer, or contribute.

    • Freedom Fighter

      Ummm, Bobby Jindal is a caucasian. I doubt Bobby Piyush Jindal ever worried about getting shot going to the gas station.

      • Freedom Fighter

        BTW, Indian society is one of the most bigoted in the world. The darkest and lowest Indians are considered “untouchables” and even if their shadow falls on you, you will be cursed. Bobby Piyush Jindal comes from a culture of oppressors against black and brown people.

        • RepublicanChick

          BTW, Indian society is one of the most bigoted in the world. The darkest and lowest Indians are considered “untouchables” and even if their shadow falls on you, you will be cursed. Bobby Piyush Jindal comes from a culture of oppressors against black and brown people

          Funny as hell considering he was born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

        • HC

          $100 to McCain.

          Keep on trolling, I haven’t maxed out my daily limit.

      • RepublicanChick

        http://www.nilacharal.com/enter/celeb/images/BobbyJindal.jpg

        That is the “whitest” looking brown man I have ever seen in my life.

        I doubt Bobby Piyush Jindal ever worried about getting shot going to the gas station.

        Yet, you still made the statement.

      • kcfromtx

        Bobby Jindal is darker than barfo. Wonder if barfo thinks he’s from Punjab.

      • Carol

        No, he’s East Indian.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        He’s a southwest asian, not a caucasian.

        Just as are people from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and a few other nations.

        They come in a variety of shades. Brown, like Jindal, is included in that rainbow.

    • Obama is a bum

      When a minority or a lefty loon tells you that you’re racist, my response would be “how the hell would you know”?

      My response is to call them a racist and 9 times out of 10 I am correct.

  • pat johnston

    I really don’t care if they think I am racist or not. I am 67 years old and I can truthfully say that I have never been called the filthy names the obots have called me and living in the South, I have always treated blacks as an equal but I don’t trust them anymore and that makes me sad. I can’t help but think that when I was teaching my children acceptance of someone that may be different but with qualities like their own, they were being to hate whites and blame us for everything wrong is this world. Well I happen to think that bo would be wrong for America and he has set black people back years.

  • texaslatina

    i am a hispanic voting for mccain/palin and i am happy racist too! and all my family members are racists too. including my cherokee grandfather who was not allowed into a restaurant in the 60′s and experienced racism first hand many a time. but, we are fu$^$@@ racists! God help us all.

    • NewHampster

      Welcome to the new tribe of Racists. We allow anyone to join.

      • AF catfish

        Are we the neo-racists like the neoliberals and neocons…I sure hope so.

        Sincerely,
        Proud neoracist catfish.

  • David

    Racism is still part of our lives. It is not unique to the USA alone as some would have people think. I wonder if one day they could pole African Americans on racial issues? It would be fair, seeing as how racism is always talked about in the context of how racist is the average white American. Call me silly, but I feel that racism has no single champion.

  • http://www.http://unityindiversity-spiritedpolitics.blogspot.com unity

    Strange, isn’t it that those who accuse us of ‘racism’ are lately squeezing in this assault between their own brutal bouts of blatant ‘sexism’

    Join the NEXT STEP of coalition Action at:

    http://www.wam08.org

    It’s time to wake up America!

  • http://sparringk9.blogspot.com sparringK9

    who or what are cheetos?

    • NewHampster

      daily kos kiddies. The big cheeto, where the cheeto eating bots hang out.

    • RepublicanChick

      I believe those are the DailyKos kids. However, it could probably describe any number of posters at Huffington Post, Taylor Marsh, and other places.

  • Anna

    I’m a racist, too! I’m voting for McKinney!

    • NewHampster

      I wonder if she is a racist since she’s not supporting bambi either?

  • McKatmoon

    He has created a manufactured racism for political gain. There is a calculation and downright bigoted attitude toward religion as well. Therein lies the correlation; The South are all bigots, anyone who is even in the slightest evangelical is racist, and by God all those small town people are racist too, because they are so uneducated,untraveled-code for unworthy of critical voter evaluation. This is the real Obama platform. He has said so himself.
    He presumes much, and uses many, especially the young, just like any snake oil salesman, he looks for the rubes.

  • McHope

    Their ‘racism’ logic is nonsensical. Are they assuming every single voter would support him if it were not for the color of his skin?
    And the AA vote carrying him with a rate of 96%, do none of those voters express negative views or comments about whites? Obama’s own pastor and wife certainly do.
    Obama’s campaign has already laid a strong foundation for divisiveness and hate in this country.
    Racism? He is driving that by representing the AA community and acting and allowing his surrogates to act in such a brutal manner. It doesn’t seem to bother him to further the stereotype of crass,immoral behavior.
    Class warfare? Implying and allowing his surrogates to imply that voters in this country are white trash, posturing that ‘educated’ liberal votes are more important than all others, and imposing financial restrictions arbitrarily on a subgroup all serve to sharpen the divide between the haves and the have nots.
    Sexism? There are no words to describe the deep seeded and brutalistic effort by the Dems to slander any female who dares stand against Obama.
    The divisive nature of this election is not only bringing to the surface the underlying resentments and prejudices in our society, but it is deepening them and fostering new ones. When insulting tactics are taken to this extreme the insults cut deep and the anger is hard to control.
    Divide and conquer.

    • LookingForwardTo2012

      Great commentary. This needs to be a 527, or at the very least, turn it over to Paul Villareal, let him set it to music and put it on youtube.

    • MrMike

      As one wag said,”If Barack Obama were white, he’d be John Edwards”.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        If he WERE a well-tanned John Edwards, the National Enquirer needs to get to work!

        Where’s the crying infant? Where’s the babymamma?

        :lol:

  • http://www.governuts.us Agust304

    Oh. I do not like AmeriCrooks. _I have a well defined meter that goes off in me anytime I see one, especially a Chicago AmeriCrook. _I should have my head and heart examined to determine the cause of my prejudice. Why don’t I like them? _Please fix me.

    Or I could save my shrink some time and just give her some books on Chicago Politics. _That might help her cure me. _I should just love crooks and election manipulators and inexperienced frauds as much as I do honest people. That would be so hokey dokey.

    Let’s go back to basics http://www.governuts.us/

    Click on Flinio’s video and remember where this all started. Daley is white. Rerzko is white (sort of) Ayers is white (kill all the whiteys) Jerimia likes white girls. Whites are the problem.

    I never understood a single word he said.. but I helped him drink his wine.

    Joy to the World.

  • SJ

    If Obama lose its because he picked the wrong VP, everyone knew that was the dream ticket anyway it fell but Obama did not want that so he has a right to lose big time.

    • richasis

      obama should have been the vp candidate.

      • Psychic madwoman

        AMEN!

      • QUEENIE

        Obama is not qualified to be VP..and he certainly is not even close to qualified to be POTUS..

        PUMA

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        We would have had sixteen years of peace and prosperity…eight under Clinton, and eight under a Clinton-schooled Obama.

        But he couldn’t wait. He was impatient. Audacious. A stupid, fucking, selfish IDIOT.

        He can take his “fierce urgency of NOW” and stuff it up his hubris-laden ass. He singlehandedly SCREWED the Democratic Party. And Howard Dean HELPED.

  • Anna

    We’re in good company. The Clintons are racists, too! … Or was that last week?

    • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

      That was so…… last week. Now the Obamatrons are suppose to suck up to us by telling us it was all an unfortuante misunderstanding with the Clintons.

    • Carol

      We’re in good company. The Clintons are racists, too! … Or was that last week?

      And the week before that and the week before that one and on and on and on.

  • http://donnadarko.wordpress.com donna darko

    It’s not that white women are racist. Obama is classist and sexist towards the working class and women. And Unity Democrats are elitist, classist, sexist, homophobic, racist and ageist.

    Good luck to women who try to join the upper-middle class white male Whole Foods Nation. You’ll be treated the way Clinton supporters were treated.

  • Anna

    And sorry, JM08. Jindal has already said he doesn’t want the job. He said he wants the job he has.

    • http://N/A breeze

      Anna,

      Jindal is a SMART man.

      He knows he doesn’t have the experience – Y E T….

      • wonderwoman

        Jindal is my age, if he can run for president at 36 I can.

  • Canadian

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/7968.html

    An admission by Obama early January, that we’ve not heard since. But this is scary for someone applying to the highest office, someone who admits to not having executive skills.

    One only needs to listen to him speak to see the “disorganization of his thoughts” let alone his desk.

    Racism. Hardly. There are so many other critical reasons…

  • Magic Dog

    Speaking of bald faced lies, where is the “whitey” tape?

    • Magic ‘s Mommy wringing her hands at the top of the Basement Stairway

      Magic, Did you take out the trash? I asked you to take out the trash. You never do your chores. You never take out the trash. At least you could clean your room. We’re doing you a favor letting you have that basement all to yourself, mind you. Look at me when I talk to you. Don’t make faces at me. Don’t make those faces at your mother. You think it’s a picnic living with your father? Well, do you? Night after night, submitting to his filthy and perverted demands. Clean this. Alphabetize that. Bend over. Aww, who cares? Not you, obviously. You get a free ride. You’ve got a nice basement all to yourself. What do you do down there all day anyway? Well? Answer me! Don’t you ever turn off that damned computer? I worry about you, son. You don’t have any friends. All you do all day is type on that computer. All day. Don’t you have any real friends? Why don’t you have a girlfriend? You’re not, uh, you know, are you son? You can tell us. It’s all right. We’ll understand. Well, I’ll understand. Your father will throw a fit. He’ll probably have a heart attack. Or a stroke. Or pop a hemorrhoid. More hemorrhoids. Maybe he’ll even throw you out of the house. Serve you right. Youngun’s got no respect. Mother of Mary. No respect.

      • Ferd McBerfle

        ROFLMAO.

      • athena

        OMG- Still laughing and peeing in my pants!!!! Stop it – no don’t cause I needed this laugh like you would not beleive.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        That is by far the FUNNIEST, and best

        *************************************************
        !!!!!!!!TROLL ALERT!!!TROLL ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
        *************************************************

        I have seen on this site to date.

        Congratulations!!!!

      • karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now)

        LMAO.

        Good mommies say:

        “No more Cheetoes and Koolade for you!”

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      With your shitty candidate who needs a tape?

  • http://www.http://unityindiversity-spiritedpolitics.blogspot.com anonymous

    Experiencing a weird, eery phenomenon. Wonder if any others from towns like mine are noticing something similar?

    I live in a small WI community – one of the states very tight in this race. This community is very, very white. (Not where I’m from but where I now live) And very Republican.

    This summer, and more with the election nearing, suddenly there are AA’s all over town – and i do mean all over – in business groups, in all the restaurants, in rented houses.

    Feel quite certain they must be Acorn or something. Obviously here for the Nov vote. Sense there may be a sudden Dem win here. Any one notice this elsewhere?


    Please forget the racist bs. I lived in a 90% black 3rd world country and am quite comfortable with ‘people of color.” But this place I have lived in recent years has had absolutely NO AA’s. And suddenly they are all over – this is no accident of timing, I’m sure.

    Morale: if you can’t win WI with the people who live there, bring in some new people in time for the election.

    • http://www.governuts.us Agust304

      That is interesting NancyA is researching such matters. Email me at agust304@hotmail.com and I want to put you in contact with her.

      Sounds like Chicago Politics to me.

      • Bitter Knitter

        YEAH, and they’ll vote in Illinois too. Where is the MSM?

    • Canadian

      Anonymous,

      Though I’m sure they’re aware, perhpas a matter you should bring to the Republicans. As you know ACORN has already been charged with voter fraud.

    • LookingForwardTo2012

      It sounds like there could be some serious fraud going on…like federal offense fraud.

      • wonderwoman

        I hope they get caught before the election. I think the republicans will challenge all these new registrations in October so demd don’t have time to recover.

  • http://donnadarko.wordpress.com donna darko

    LoveHarriet,

    BE like Patsy and wear custom made sheets to the polls!

    • Loveharriet

      I will!!! I AM GETTING ME A SILK WHITE SHEET AND PILLOW CASE!

  • http://IthinkIfeel... Tricia Spiegel

    Yep, Excuses for losing! Ha! The race card is alibe and well in Obamaworld.

  • http://donnadarko.wordpress.com donna darko

    Here’s a must read:

    3. Hillary’s Angle. As fate had it, the phone finally rang at three in the morning chez Hillary Clinton, and this time, it was a true crisis: It was Barack Obama, begging her to save his rear end. Having beaten her in a long, angry battle, in which she and her friends thought his behavior and that of his friends had been sexist, after having broadcast the fact that she wasn’t even on his medium list for vice president, he is now asking her without the title to take on the role of de facto vice president, i.e, head attack dog in dispatching the woman who now has stolen her chance to make history. As Amy Holmes put it on CNN’s website, “In a strange twist of logic, the Obama campaign is touting the woman they passed over as the woman they need to beat the woman the other guy picked.” That sound you hear–along with a small snort from Hillary–is the weight of power in the Democratic scale sliding back to the side of the Clintons. After he made a point of stressing how little she matters, he now seems to need her more than ever. And she, of course, does not need him.

    Rather the opposite. If Obama wins, she gets to see her party in power, if that is her object. The problem is that the party is no longer hers. Or hers and her husband’s. If Obama wins, the Clintons become history. They also slip down considerably on the great grid of power: She is eclipsed by a president who defeated her, a first lady who hates her, a loquacious vice president with a large, lively family, and a legion of people who early on threw in their lots with Obama, and have prior claims upon him and his loyalty. She becomes in effect a footnote to history, remembered perhaps for her personal dramas, her historic run in the primaries no longer remarkable, but overshadowed by Sarah Palin’s run for vice president. Win or lose, Palin becomes the country’s most visible she-politician, culture phenomenon, as well as the best bet to succeed John McCain at the head of her party. Hillary is yesterday’s news, and has the rest of her life to brood on the mistakes that caused her to lose–very narrowly–the great prize she wanted and pursued, some will tell you, for the past 30 years.

    This changes, however, if McCain wins. At once, she becomes the most important Democrat, the shipwreck survivor, the frontrunner for her party’s 2012 nomination; the road not taken; the one that, if followed, would have led to the outcome for which her party has struggled so long. For four long years, she will be saying “I told you so”–to the super-delegates who didn’t flock to her even when she won all those big primaries; to Obama, now back in the Senate, who didn’t name her when he had his big chance. A deflated Messiah, a wünderkind who couldn’t quite hack it, Obama would join Al Gore and John Kerry in the weary line of pitiful losers who tried and failed to match Bill Clinton’s success. Bill Clinton himself becomes the Big Dog again, the one shining light in the overall darkness, the only Democrat to be elected twice since Franklin D. Roosevelt, the most successful Democrat since the mid-1960s, when Lyndon Johnson’s luck, along with his party’s good fortune, ran out. (Granted, this is a fairly low bar to get over. But still.) If you were Hillary Clinton, which prospect would you find more appealing? Let’s guess.

    • http://www.governuts.us Agust304

      I will end my day the same way it started. I, too, miss Hillary.

      Rise 2012.

      It’s not that far away.

    • LookingForwardTo2012

      Spot on analysis!

    • MrMike

      If you were Hillary Clinton, which prospect would you find more appealing? Let’s guess.

      I guess she would want a Democrat in the White House today even if it ended her political ambitions, Noenema Emery. Some people are like that, they’ll put country ahead of self, even if they are wrong about their choice of who can best lead in this time.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        I think she’d want a QUALIFIED DEMOCRAT in the White House. Not “any” Democrat. She’s not stupid. And she used to be a Republican as a youngster, so she doesn’t have that “Ugh–they’re all two-headed monsters” attitude that some partisans develop.

        She’ll stump for this pretender because she HAS TO.

        Thank heavens he HATES her, so she doesn’t have to do too much of it.

        Clinton has a vision for this nation that is best realized by having CLINTON IN CHARGE.

  • politicsIsdirty

    Race? What race? He is still scary even if he is white. Just think Ayers, Wright, Rezco, Logan Act etc.

    ANOTHER CASE OF RACE BAITING!!

    I think what is true is that a number of Americans are not voting for McCain because he is old. Whatever happened to the America that we all knew. Why are old people discrimitated. Those people who discriminate against old people should be ashamed.

    All Americans should vote McCain/Palin to show that Americans pay respect to the elderly and don’t practice AGE discrimination.

    McCain/Palin 2008.

    • Obama is a bum

      If Obama were white he would have been run out of the Democratic party.

      • mcpalin hill

        If Obama were white he would have been run out of the Democratic party — unless the DNC was moved to Chicago and handed to Obama. Now the party has trouble making the payroll and Obama feels free to turn down Harry Reid’s request for money to help with the Congressional elections.

  • Magic Dog

    I live in a small WI community – one of the states very tight in this race. This community is very, very white. (Not where I’m from but where I now live) And very Republican.

    This summer, and more with the election nearing, suddenly there are AA’s all over town – and i do mean all over – in business groups, in all the restaurants, in rented houses.

    Did they bring the “whitey” tape with them?

    • vinnie

      don’t quit your day job…your sarcasm wasn’t even worth a grunt let alone a laugh.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      ************************************************
      !!!!!!Troll Alert !!!!!!!!!!!Troll Alert!!!!!!!
      ************************************************

      Magic, stop pulling on yer pud and listen to your mother for once!!! Come up from that basement and take out the Gaaaaah-bage!!!!

  • mrduffin

    I left two post at FoxNews about the article and neither got posted. They were very mild post about not voting for Obama because I do not trust him and not because he is non-white. It looks like Fox is scared of the racist thing too.

    • Firefly

      This would be a good question to call into Hannity’s or O’Reilly’s radio show with – tell them that this is what CNN’s and MSNBC’s websites did all through the primaries against Hillary and against McCain now. It is censorship – it is the opposite of democracy – it is beyond scary.

      What the hell is Fox up to, Sean, Bill? If they don’t know about it, they need to ask about it.

      • Obama is a bum

        Hannity gets called racist a lot more than the rest of us. He was called racist for referring to Obama supporters as Kool-Aid Drinkers.

  • K in CO

    Just saw a video on Gretawire about the economic situation is economic terrorism backed by Soros and company. The video was by Cramer interviwed by a lady who kept trying to talk over him. Anybody else aware of this story?

    • NewHampster

      Kramer did not name Soros. He was talking theoretically. That said the story is out there and people are waiting to be sure it’s not a conspiracy theory.

  • McKatmoon

    I’d like to thank the academy for all their support and encouragement to travel to blog sites and push our agenda. Only we know what is right. We are clever and can win. I want to thank my mentor the great O in teaching me that it is divine to make senseless remarks on blogs, because in the end we will win. Go team go

    This speech brought to you by, Hollywood bots, and doorknobs for Obama. Vote early, vote often, vote only for the O.

  • NYSmike

    Still waiting for the reverse racism poll.

    Remember the SC primary exit polls where black people were asked if the color of Barack’s skin had any influence on their vote? The majority, very large majority said NO. NO??? Of course his experience “cough! cough!” must have been all the reason they needed.

  • Holly 4 Mcain and Palin

    I truly believe when Obama is down and out that the race cards comes about.But what about when they say what? 89$ Afraicans Americans support Obama.They why are they not talking about that as Racist? Well guess wht I am not racist of any race opr color.It’s just I don’t understand why they have to start this again.What do they want us to fall in line.Just because people don’t support Obama it’s racist? Give me a Fu**ing break.It’s just the democratics -Yahoo some web pages are trying to mess with the people.It’s those who put this out needs to find a true job.They know what they are saying isn’t true it’s hey we may have some feel sorry form Obama.Not a change.Look when you have 87? Afraican american as so they say democratics-msnbc-cnnn and polls will say.What are the fu** do they come up with this stuff.Again blaming it on people who will not vote for his tail.The media again atr tryiong to pull it their way.Well no way ever.Get another job.You again are trying to use the people msnbc-cnn- press.GET LOST!

    McCain/Palin 08

  • DirOfTheObv

    They are just tryin’ to guilt people into voting for his sorry butt. They think they’ll get some sympathy switchers.

    It’s disgusting!

    The polls are tight….he don’t have no problems over race!

    • mcpalin hill

      diroftheobvious — I think they know they are going to lose and they want to blame us for the loss.

      Look I don’t care what they label people like me who voted for Hillary and now will vote for McCain. As long as Obama and I both agree he will lose — thats good enough for me.

  • Mr. X

    Oh, right. That’s it. The AP did this story to explain, in advance, why Obama lost. Like we needed a poll to tell us that white supremacy is rife in America! (The site, Exhibit A.) Give. Me. A. Break.

  • margarita

    I could never vote for 0bama no matter what color he is. White, purple or green, he’s not qualified to be PUSA and not getting my vote.

    period.

  • http://www.hillaryorbust.com Hillary or Bust

    Here is a simple solution: For anyone who calls a McCain supporter racist, let’s call them a misogynist.

    “PEOPLE WHO DON’T SUPPORT PALIN MUST BE MISOGYNISTS.” That’s my new line.

    I mean, really. This is getting silly. While I have always believed sexism hurt Hillary, I would have never said that people who voted for someone else were outright misogynists for it.

    • http://www.governuts.us Agust304

      Men who don’t support Palin can’t get a hard on.

      Nobody hits on the women who don’t support Palin.

      Biden falls down drunk on your daughter as he tries to kiss her tits.

      Obama licks Wright’s toilet for inspiration.

      That’s our foursome.

  • Jason in Chicago

    I was in downtown San Francisco last week when I guy at an Obama/Biden table accused me of being a racist because, when asked, I told him, “No, in fact, I am not supporting Obama, do not want to donate, and neither want a pin or sticker.”
    I told him, that by his logic, he is in fact a bigger racist (and misogynist) for not supporting Green Party nominee Cynthia McKinney.
    He had no response so I just kept walking.

  • NewHampster

    UPDATE: From Politico

    Ben Smith Questioning the Race Poll

    The AP study also seems to have been conducted among a population of Democrats more skeptical of Obama than normal. Both polls ABC-News/Washington Post, as well as the massive weekly summaries of the Gallup Poll, demonstrates that since late August between 83 and 85 percent of Democrats say they will vote for Obama. The AP study interviewed a population where only seven in ten Democrats said they support Obama, a notably low number.

  • tzada

    A Call For Hearings Into Senator Barack Obama’s Violation Of The Logan Act
    Write a Letter to Congress : 5,019 Letters Sent So Far
    We demand that Congress open hearings on Senator Barack Obama’s potential violations of the Logan Act.

    On at least two separate occasions, as documented by NBC and The New York Post, Senator Barack Obama has attempted to negotiate a delay to U.S. negotiations with Iraq until after the elections.

    We feel this is an egregious abuse of his position and in violation of the Logan Act, which by historical judicial interpretation prevents anyone, including members of Congress, from interfering with U.S. negotiations.

    If you believe Obama violated the Logan act go to this link. It’s so easy to voice your concern.

    http://www.rallycongress.com/americansentinel/1223/a-call-for-hearings-into-senator-barack-obamas-violation-of-the-logan-act/

    Note: use the “send for free” option.

  • http://Democratswrite bob

    Not All White Voters Who Fail to Support Obama Are Racist

    There have been recent charges by certain political pundits to the effect that, if you are a white American and particularly a white Democrat and do not support Barack Obama, you are probably a racist. This premise goes against Obama’s campaign assertion that America is not about red states and blue states, but is about the United States of America. Obama advocates that Americans need not be so polarized by political party loyalty. Therefore, it would appear Obama believes it is acceptable to not always vote solely along party lines and all candidates, regardless of their party affiliation, have to earn each individual’s vote.

    To recklessly label someone a racist due to his political opinion is ignorant and lazy. After someone is called a racist, that usually ends all political debate.

    It may not even be a true statement that Obama does not have the support of White Americans in the Democratic Party. A recent poll showed that almost 80% of Democrats are supporting Obama.

    It should be noted that in North Carolina in the 2004 presidential election, white candidate John Kerry only garnered 27% of the white vote in North Carolina. Obviously, the 73% of the white voters who did not vote for Kerry in North Carolina did not vote against him due to the fact he was a white man. In all likelihood, they voted against Kerry because they did not support his policies. Therefore, it is extremely reckless to label someone a racist who does not support Obama. Obama is currently leading in many of the states Democrats have recently been winning in presidential elections and is behind in historically Republican presidential states.

    At the risk of being labeled a racist, for historical purposes and for legitimate discussion, I will attempt to articulate what are some of the problems if there are problems with Obama and his candidacy.

    The first problem Obama has is that he lacks a substantive message. His political message is of change and hope with his message having no real specifics. The greatest part of Obama’s political message is about fancy words and well delivered political speeches. Watching his campaign it appears we have ventured back to the flair of the disco days of the seventies where the production is more important than the actual message. I would suggest that it would help Obama’s campaign if he would attempt to have a more intimate one on one conversation with voters. There are issues in which the two presidential candidates differ such as the Iraq War, off shore drilling, capital gains tax, employee taxes, and tax cuts. Each voter will have to decide which candidate’s political position he supports.

    Many Americans could have a real problem with Obama’s lack of experience. One thing that is quite troublesome is that he began running for president immediately after winning his current Senate seat. Failure to begin or to fulfill his Senate obligation could be interpreted as a lack of loyalty to the voters of Illinois that elected the candidate and suggest out of control ambition on the part of Obama. It should be noted that many North Carolina citizens resented John Edwards not fulfilling his first United States Senate term prior to beginning his run for the Presidency of the United States.

    Obama does not have a sterling work history. He was a state legislator for the state of Illinois which is certainly not that impressive. He has been criticized for refusing to vote yes or no on many issues while in the state legislature of Illinois and casting only a present vote refusing to put his political positions on recorded record in order that he could latter be held accountable for his vote. Obama is 47 years old and his lack of a significant work history is troublesome. Unlike the other presidential candidate, he has no military background.

    Obama’s former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright has been widely criticized for the publications and philosophies advocated by the church Obama attended for twenty years in Chicago, Illinois. Many of the church messages from the pulpit have been considered by many to be racist, anti -America and sexist. Obama’s explanation that he was unaware of the controversial preaching’s of his church after attending the church for 20 years has caused him to lose creditability with many voters.

    There are other things that have brought scrutiny to Obama such as a questionable land deal with a since convicted felon Tony Rezko from whom Obama purchased the lot adjoining Obama’s current residence and his association with controversial former radical Weatherman activist Bill Ayers.

    In discussing what harmed the personal opinion of Obama with certain Democrats, you only need to look to the organization Moveon.org. Moveon is an organization that was design to promote Democratic causes and is an organization that solicits Democrats all over the country for political donations. During the presidential primaries, Moveon announced that it was solely supporting Obama for president over Hillary Clinton and Moveon began promoting Obama’s candidacy over fellow Democrat Hillary Clinton. Moveon used financial resources that it had obtained from Democrats all over the country to defeat and destroy a fellow Democrat without any objection from Obama. Moveon released a valuable 1.7 million Democratic e-mail list to the Obama campaign. These actions violated a sense of fairness and did serious harm to unity of the Democratic Party.

    Many voters opinion of Barack Obama has been harmed with the ruthless one sided pro Obama blogs like Daily Kos and the Huffington Post whose primary duties have been to attempt to seek and to destroy Obama’s political opponents. These blogs rendered ruthless daily attacks on fellow Democrat Hillary Clinton, causing great resentment within the Democratic Party.

    The national media has been pro Obama to a fault. Rightfully or wrongfully, Obama’s popularity may have been hurt by a general feeling of unfairness of the national media in favor of Obama. A recent Rasmussen poll demonstrated that 51% of those polled believe the national media is attempting to have Obama elected president of the United Sates with its biased political coverage. Many of the national media attacks against Hillary Clinton have been considered vicious and sexist by many Democrats.

    Many believe Obama’s followers went too far when they accused Bill and Hillary Clinton of being racist and running a racist campaign against Obama. Many Hillary Clinton supporters believe that the Democratic national committee members went out out of their way to assure that Obama was the Democratic nominee.

    Again, labeling someone a racist has no benefit. Voters have many issues to sift through prior to deciding who will be their presidential choice in the upcoming election. There are many issues that will decide this presidential contest other than a candidate’s race.

    Bobby Dees

    • Montague

      Well stated.

      I didn’t vote for Jimmy Carter. I won’t vote for Barack Obama. Other than that I have supported every Democrat ever put up for president during my voting years. My first vote was Carter-Ford and I couldn’t even vote for prez. Well, I voted for Mondale for VP because I’ve always liked Mondale.

      This year I won’t vote for McCain. It’ll be left blank (because Biden? ugh), or perhaps I’ll vote for Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Clemente. It’s pretty ridiculous when people try to label me racist.

      • http://Democratswrite bob

        I didn’t vote for Jimmy Carter either time Last Republican president candidate I voted for was Ronald Reagan first term. No Obama no way I am voting for McCain

        • LookingForwardTo2012

          I voted for Reagan both terms. I haven’t seen polling data on this subject, but I imagine that John McCain will get quite a few Reagan Democrats. I think Obama knows that and perhaps that’s the reason he praised and praised Reagan, while never complimenting Bill Clinton. Anything having to do with Bill Clinton’s Presidency, he refers to as “what we did in the 90′s”…or to that effect.

  • Obama is a bum

    Oh but of course I know the real reason for a study like this now. It is to play the race card. To once more tickle white guilt and see if a few more dems won’t vote for The One™ just so they can be sure not to feel guilty like the rest of us poor racist trash.

    You are right on target. I identified long ago that the race card was all Obama and his supporters had and that has certainly been the case.

    Any so-called dialog on race needs to be two-way otherwise the hell with that nonsense.

    I actually don’t care if someone calls me racist since I will call them racist back and at least I will be correct.

    I have heard numerous white people try to deflect being called racist by making the statement “I am not racist but I do not support Obama.” Or “I am not racist but _____.” When has anyone ever heard a non-white person start a sentence off like that? I am proud to say I never have and never will. I am also proud to say I have none of this pathetic white guilt that a great number of white people have been feed and have been dumb enough to absorb. Many people have become programmed zombies.

    With blacks voting over 90% for Obama vs. Clinton that supports the conclusion that blacks are heavily racist. And with blacks voting 99% for Obama vs. McCain that also supports the conclusion that blacks have a racial problem. I personally do not know any white people who oppose Obama because he is black but I do know several that support him because he is black and suffer from white guilt.

  • Lipstick LaPig

    EXCELLENT NEWS:
    httpCOLON//wwwDOTmiamiheraldDOTcom/news/politics/florida/story/694979.html

  • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

    The methodology of the questions were really weak. Example: Blacks are lazy: yes/no.

    Well, maybe some are and some aren’t. Maybe you think both blacks and whites are lazy. Maybe you think that most blacks are lazier than most whites, but you don’t assume that a black you meet is lazy. Maybe you think blacks are lazy and you think the younger generation, regardless of race is lazy. Maybe you think blacks are lazy, and you find Obama an admirable exception to your prejudice. …etc…etc…etc….

    In other words, it tells us nothing.

    • notodisenfranchisement

      It tells us that the people who wrote the poll questions are projecting their inner racism.

  • JM08

    Stop being racist, Obama got 90% of the black vote against Hillary Clinton (wife of “first” black president Bill Clinton) because of his stance on the capital gains tax and global warming …

    • lute

      Well, he did say he was a Uniter.
      That is he would unite black people to vote down racial lines.

    • KathyNeocon

      Right. And I have some swampland to sell you.

    • http://Democratswrite bob

      Obama wants to raise capital gains tax and employment taxes killing small businesses

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      This IS a joke, right?

  • athy

    New Hampster,
    Good article.

    Here are several articles that point out how the strategy in the Obama campaign was to play the race card as often as possible, divide the people, and conqer them.

    They used race baiting to get the angry black votes and win over the sympathetic white votes. So much for unity…

    Also, Sen Obama was trained as a Community organizer under the Saul Alinsky method. This approach teaches and promotes the divide and conquer technique to get what you want out of community and other people in power…

    http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=aa0cd21b-0ff2-4329-88a1-69c6c268b304

    The New Republic, “Race Man” by Sean Wilentz
    ************
    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070219/hayes

    The Nation, “Obama”s Media Maven” by Chrisptoher Hayes. 2/19/08 issue
    **************

    Alinsky

    http://www.windycitizen.com/2008/07/ask-a-community-organizer-what-is-community-organizing-anyway

    http://infed.org/thinkers/alinsky.htm

    • NewHampster

      Thank you for the references. We in the field for Hillary in NH saw what was happening but nobody would listen. I think more and more are listening now.

  • Dee

    So when Obama predicted that “they” would use race against him, he had it backwards. He and the MSM are playing the race card to try to guilt people into voting for him. I don’t care if he was my favorite color blue, it doesn’t mean that I am going to vote for him because of it. I didn’t realize that John Kerry and Al Gore lost to George Bush because they were black.

    Does Obama really want to try to put yet another label on people — like bitter small-town, sweetie, typical white grandmother? How is that unifying? I suggest that the Democrats try holding a fair primary season and not force that swing all the way to the left if they want more votes.

    • lute

      More than that. Emphasizing the race issue polarizes blacks, and gives whites a sense of righteous mission that they are voting against racism.

    • Obama is a bum

      He and the MSM are playing the race card to try to guilt people into voting for him.

      Correct. After over 40 years of spoon feeding guilt over white people many have become very manipulative, just mention racist and their heads will spin to try and prove they are not racist.

      I actually don’t think the vast majority of these idiots playing the race card think people repulsed by Obama are racist but understand the power and ease of manipulating them. In many cases they are very easy to manipulate.

  • Skip

    As a Puma Democrat I’m voting Cynthia McKinney.

    So, am I a racist?

    PUMA

    • Obama is a bum

      No, you are stupid. That person has a chance of a snowball in hell of winning. The only person with a chance to defeat Obama is McCain and that is where a vote will do the most good.

    • Psychic madwoman

      Skip is a bot posing as a PUMA.

      They are on all of the blogs.

  • HARP

    They must be talking about the NEW democrat party, or have they forgotten that WE aren`t needed.

  • JM08

    Skip voting for cynthia mckinney does not make you a racist, but it does make you a IDIOT.

    Heres a tip … Save your gas money and just pretend you voted LOL

    Damn Cynthia McKinney … No woman symbolizes the black community as much as her … She is about as ghetto as they come LOL

    • Skip

      Yep, that argument got me, JM08.

      You did it. I’m voting for Obama now!

      Congratulations! You converted me. Now, you can move on to the next one on your list.

      PUMA

      • Ferd McBerfle

        LMAO

      • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

        Get a job Skippy. My pie isn’t available to you and it’s not going to be.

    • Ferd McBerfle

      You’re a sexist swine and a racist. You should go away while you’re ahead, twerp. There’s no room for that crap here.

  • McKatmoon

    You just love making disgusting remarks about women; now you get to add racist to your profile. A$$

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      Let him talk. It’s A Holes like him that have lost so many voters for Obama. His followers are pond scum.

  • http://www.governuts.us Agust304

    Alert

    Men who don’t support Palin can’t get a hard on.

    Nobody hits on the women who don’t support Palin.

    Biden falls down drunk on your daughter as he tries to kiss her tits.

    Obama licks Wright’s toilet for inspiration.

    That’s our foursome.

    • Kat5

      Try again, ‘Bot-Troll.

    • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

      Cleanup, Aisle 6!!!!

  • yttik

    Racism requires power behind it. Without that power it’s just plain old bigotry.

    It’s all bass akwards to accuse us peons counting pennies for gas of oppressing the guy flying over in his private jet and running for the highest office in the land. What do I have to oppress Obama with? My one little vote that may or may not get lost in a voting machine? Obama has millions of dollars, the media, and a huge marketing machine behind him. Like it or not, he is at top of the food chain. Nobody down here on the bottem can victimize Obama.

  • http://www.deathofthedemocraticparty.com xax

    Framin’ it up so it won’t look so bad.

    Dang he can get there on his own, but he can’t LOSE on his own.

    What is happening in this country? It’s a culture of guilt, blame and entitlement.

  • Sanjong Thapa

    Obama has never ‘walked a their shoes’.

    Obama’s skin color does not make him like similar to African-Americans.

    • http://JohnMcCain.com Chockablock “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease” Opampers

      He is indeed a poser, a chameleon if you will. A trophy for a bunch of seriously misguided people who are putting ideology over country.

  • islander

    Who paid for that poll?
    That racist crap is worn out already!
    I say, Racist, schmasist, call me a window fan if it pleases you, I still won’t vote foe a guy who has no resume for the world’s biggest job.

  • http://JohnMcCain.com Chockablock “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease” Opampers

    If Opampers loses because of racism it will be because he and his followers are racists. People can blame shift all they want. I ain’t buying it.

  • bert

    Before I can intelligently respond to this “report,” I need to know the methodology. How did the study authors or designers come to this conclusion? How did the ‘interview’ people. There us too much information missing to draw any logical or honest conclusions. Also, who commissioned and paid for the study?

    In absence of any such info I think it may just be an attempt by someone in the Obama campaign to shame people into voting for him and /or they are trying to lay the foundation for why they lost the election.

    • NewHampster

      from up in the comments

      UPDATE: From Politico

      Ben Smith Questioning the Race Poll

      The AP study also seems to have been conducted among a population of Democrats more skeptical of Obama than normal. Both polls ABC-News/Washington Post, as well as the massive weekly summaries of the Gallup Poll, demonstrates that since late August between 83 and 85 percent of Democrats say they will vote for Obama. The AP study interviewed a population where only seven in ten Democrats said they support Obama, a notably low number.

      • Dan

        ” … between 83 and 85 percent of Democrats say they will vote for Obama.”

        Yep, that’s what they say, all right. What they’ll actually do once they’re all alone in the voting booth is the question.

        Two words: Bradley Effect.

        It will be worth an additional 2 percentage points for McCain on election day at the minimum, maybe more.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        It would be interesting to know if it was an AUTOMATED poll, with a mechanical voice, or an actual HUMAN was on the other end of the line?

        I think people tend to be more honest to robots.

        Not Obots, mind–robots, like the Lost in Space one, or Robbie or R2D2–if you could understand his ass!

  • Klare McKasKill aka the “Chuckie Doll”

    “What this man has done, Barack Obama, is, he, for the first time I think, as a black leader in America, has come to the American people not as a victim, but rather as a leader.”

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Yeah, he leads by whining about what a victim he’s been all these years….oh, my absent father! Oh, my SINGLE mother! (Shhhh…let’s not talk overmuch about the present STEPFATHER)…. Oh, my racist grandma! Oh, my loser grampa! Oh, the PAIN of growing up in Hawaii! NOBODY UNDERSTANDS ME, poor, poor me!

      Fuck that shit. There’s something to be said about “Suck it up and get on with it.”

      This guy has done next to nothing, and written two whining books about his experience.

      :roll:

  • John Kerrie

    “He has the ability to help us bridge the divide of religious extremism,” Kerry said. “To maybe even give power to moderate Islam to be able to stand up against this radical misinterpretation of a legitimate religion.”

    Kerry was asked what gives Obama that credibility.

    “Because he’s African-American. Because he’s a black man.

    • Dan

      Right. If you’re a white man running for president you can never hope to bridge the racial divide.

      Thanks for setting me straight on that one, John.

    • KathyNeocon

      So you have to be black to interpret a religion and try to bridge it’s differences with other religions?? Okelly-dokelly. And why do we need to brige with Islam to begin with?? I’ll pass.

      More nonsense from Kool-aid swelling uber-leftists crazys in the Democratic party.

  • One Small Vote for McCain

    I am amazed at how quickly NoQuarter writers and readers forget the fundamentals:

    Obama is a RACIST! Read his 2 books. Read his words about the Gena 6 trial. Watch Wright and Cone!

    Obama is a communist fascist! See his mentor Marshall Davis. Notice who has bankrolled him in Chicago–Bill Ayers father Thomas. Look at the Pritzer and Soros money behind him. Get out your dictionaries…look up FACIST…look up COMMUNIST! The federal state will cure every ill and give us all our wishes! And you will have to pay for it with you life…with you community service and military draft.

    Obama is a liar! Look at him change every position for a vote!

    Man you all can see evil…you just can’t believe it when it confronts you!

    Obama is evil from top to bottom and through to the core!

    • http://JohnMcCain.com Chockablock “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease” Opampers

      I am amazed at how quickly NoQuarter writers and readers forget the fundamentals:

      Did you read the other comments before posting yours?

      I said:

      If Opampers loses because of racism it will be because he and his followers are racists. People can blame shift all they want. I ain’t buying it.

      We have not forgotten anything. We are battle scarred and bruised by his racism.

    • Obama is a bum

      Obama is a RACIST!

      I’ll agree with that. If anyone wants to assign racism at least they should get it right.

    • wonderwoman

      I too find it odd he is down on whites. I know alot of mixed people are racists. I guess because they aren’t accepted. Did his grandparents not provide a good home.

  • Dan

    Sure, there are no doubt lots of white voters who won’t vote for Obama because he’s black. But there are also a lot of black voters who will vote for Obama solely because he is black. Is one really any worse than the other?

  • yttik

    I bet Obama over polls in the black community, too. There’s a lot of pressure and bullying going on, black people might tell a pollster they support Obama when in fact they don’t. People will say what they perceive is expected of them, just to get everybody off their case.

    I’ve had to deal with being accused of racism, but my black friends who don’t support Obama have been accused of being traitors, of being white, etc.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Oh, yeah.

      It’s easier to “go along and get along” at times.

      Who needs the agita?

  • ed

    Shameless post for my videos for anyone that hasn’t seen them -

    shortest one

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1ajJYkMd74

    longer – but I thought clever

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89P8Xl3mMLE

    • http://Democratswrite bob

      Great video It has almost every member of the conspiracy There were a few innocent faces

    • karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now)

      When both those vids came out I linked them around and promoted them. I didn’t know they were from the same source. Excellent work on both.

  • blog force one

    until I heard r. Wrights awful hate filled anti white race baiting trash I thought things in this country had improved greatly .However I had no idea there was this virulent anti American white hating cancer eating up the AA community. ,MLK would be truly saddened by wrights hatefilled deviding poison. BTW. Obama being a major donor to the UCC got a subscription to the trumpet delivered to his home every month filled with this Hamas and Farrakhan America hating indoctrination material and I am certain he read all about it and supported it It is no wonder that his wife Michelle refused to attend the 911 mwmorial . I am sure that she has never told her daughters about what happened then in 2001 and if she did she most likely said “they had it coming” meaning white New Yorkers and the jews

    • McHope

      Obama being a major donor to the UCC got a subscription to the trumpet delivered to his home every month filled with this Hamas and Farrakhan America hating indoctrination material

      I hadn’t thought about that.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        He probably got courtesy copies of all those Rev Wright DVD gift box sermons that they sold in the TUCC gift shop, too.

        The guy gave MANY THOUSANDS annually to that church, after all.

  • miriam

    I really can’t believe what is happening to our country. I’ve lived through decades of presidential elections and this one is like nothing I’ve ever seen. It’s almost as if the Democrats deliberately set out to divide the country. OF COURSE there’s racism in America. (There’s also sexism, ageism, and homophobia.) We didn’t need a study to tell us there will be people who won’t vote for Obama because he is half Arabic/black. And the Democrats had to have known this long before the primaries so why are they whining about it now?

    They’re whining, as many here have already said, because they expect guilt to drive white voters to Obama. But then again, no one has ever successfully accused the Democratic party of being realistic. What the party apparently didn’t count on was that so many Democrats would find Obama so fatally flawed that even if we did feel a twinge of racist guilt we could live with it—rather than put this egotistical charlatan in the Oval Office.

    I will never forgive the Democrats (my late unlamented party) for perpetrating on America the most hate-filled election since 1860.

    • mcpalin hill

      miriam — I agree with everything you said. The liberals have taken over the party and they are as mean as junkyard dogs. Unlike the right who wants to win–latte liberals want to lose to prove that the country isn’t good enough for them. They blew the party apart in 1972 with George McGovern. Personally he was a nice man but his supporters were lunatics. Outside of Carter in 1976 who won because of Watergate and Bill Clinton who won in 1992 because Ross Perot was on the ballot — Democrats don’t win presidential elections because people fear the liberal dogma.

      • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

        I consider myself a progressive/liberal, but I will not vote for Obama since he is the most undemocratic and fascist candidate I have ever seen, even surpassing GWB in many ways.

        BTW, Bill Clinton was elected twice, which is no small feat.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        I’m a liberal, I’m just not a Chavez kissing idiot. I believe in social programs to help the poor, the sick and the elderly. I like HEAD START. I think we could skim a few cents off of unearned profits for the national coffers–nothing dramatic, just a bit.

        I’m a fucking liberal–just not someone who wants to sell our country out to Putin, any number of Chinese Politburo members, Fidel or Achmed Ahmadinejad….just to “prove” that I’m not an “Imperialist.”

        Be careful waving that broad brush.

    • DirOfTheObv

      As God is My Witness…I 100% agree with you.

  • TeakwoodKite

    When will someone do a study of the real reasons so many of us distrust his lying ass?
    mmm….NewHampster, would that be called vetting?

    Sure like to get ya brand new wheel for that cage… at least you could go round in style…

    there’s a cold one on the porch for ya.

    PS…Do you think is the AP jsut trying to re-publish Michelle’s Thesis? Just wondering…

    • KathyNeocon

      Never, because the MSM doesn’t want to get into any of that. They just want to paint it all as racism to guilt us “folks” into voting for His Royal Highness.

    • mcpalin hill

      teakwood — I have read 5 versions of this same article in the last couple of days. When you hear it from Obama’s head cheerleader Claire McCaskill you know these are the Obama Campaign’s talking points.

  • http://none Jessie Britton

    Its going to be much worst than 2 1/2% as they claim that the Bradley effect alone could count for as much as 4 to 6 % and I think that number is low as that was based on California numbers. When you factor in the South and Border states, the number could zoom to 6 to 12% and Obama will lose in a landslide. Do I think this is right? No, but with a 94% AA vote Obama vote, its just race the other way. I will be so glad when this is all over.

  • steel magnolia

    I guess I am a racist because I’m so sick of being labeled one, so sick of hearing my black friends make comments about how things are going to change now that a black man will be “in charge” (yes, that’s what they told me), so tired of seeing people like P. Diddy and Ludacris and idiots like that talk about getting out the black vote for Obama, tired of my white friends telling me it’s “time” for us to vote a black man in and ask me if I’m not voting for him because he’s black. I’m sick to death of it. I used to never think twice about whether someone was black or white when I considered voting for them and have voted for candidates that WERE black, but at this point, I’m not sure I would again. There, I said it – I’m just so turned off by this playing of the race card every stinking time you disagree with Obama or his minions.

    It’s sure affected my way of looking at race relations in this country and not in a good way. Reverse discrimination is harmful, too.

    • karen for Clinton (sigh, McPalin now)

      I totally understand your post. I did everything right my whole life regarding race relations, every single day in every single way and went out of my way to march for rights and find homes for black people to integrate neighborhoods and never once didn’t fight against any racial smear I ever heard. You name it, I did it all.

      My landlord and my daughter’s babysitter were black, many of my friends through my life etc, etc. etc. etc.

      Then a few months ago I had a week or so where I was so furious over remarks made by black people I know regarding ob and Hillary, and so furious at the media and at obots calling me and others racist that it temporarily made me say FINE YOU WANT IT THAT WAY!

      I calmed down and came to my senses after a few weeks, but boy oh boy, they pushed my very last RACE CARD button. I blasted one black friend and broke out in tears to another black friend. Both of whom I rarely speak to anymore… but the same for my white obot friends. They insulted the hell out of Hillary and Bill and insisted they were racists and praised ob beyond all logic.

      For the first time in my life I understood how and why people can become racist – and that alone shook me.

      It passed. I am me again. I had to remind myself that if he changed me then he wins his divide and conquer plan. I am not a racist and ob can f’n bite me.

      And that is what I mean when I repeat the often quoted remark by many that ob is setting back race relations.

      The man is a divider and stirs up nothing but anger.

      We had this horror show thrust upon us by this man, put the blame where it belongs and don’t blame the victims. We must defeat him, for the sake of all, whether they understand that or not.

      I am very much at peace with who I am again, but that POS did have me going there for a while.

      I always did HATE false accusations. Never insult my character and try to blame me when I am innocent. I think most people with dignity are like that and that is exactly why it will backfire over time.

      In August of ’07 I sat in my sister’s kitchen with friends, all of us democrats and said “what are the democrats thinking? A woman AND a black man in the same year! YIKES!” Little did I know how accurate it would prove to be and how my funny little remark would come back to haunt me many, many times.

      • Ferd McBerfle

        The man is a divider and stirs up nothing but anger.

        I agree and that makes him unfit for office, never mind his lack of qualifications. We need someone who can unite us–not someone who will constantly remind us (just by his very presence) of what could have been–so that we can right the Ship of State.

  • The Hell with Obama

    I’m not voting for Obama,
    I don’t give a damn what they say.
    They can talk and talk and talk
    They can take an effin’ walk
    I’m not voting for Obama any day!

  • apishapa

    Actually, it is clear that at least 80% of blacks are voting for Obama because of his skin color and for no other reason. In addition a high percentage of whites who are voting for him are doing so because of his race. Or conversely they are voting against McCain because he is white. They are racists.

    In addition, a whole shitload of little kids are backing Obama because he is young and “cool”. Or they are opposing McCain because he is “old”. They are ageists.

    And there are a lot of Obama supporters who will vote against Palin because she is female. They are misogyists. Conversely, a large number are voting for Palin because she is a woman. They are “voting with their vaginas”. So, be it.

    But, there are more of us who simply think Obama is a lousy candidate. Some of us think he is a crook and a liar. Some of us object to his loco preachers. Some of us object to the way he treats women.Some of us find him untrustworthy for other reasons, like his constant “changing” of his positions and his sickening habit of casting aside his friends when they displease him or threaten to put a crack in that hopey-changey facade he has plastered over his face. We just do not trust a man like that.

    Some of us are just plain sick and tired of being ordered to “hope” for “change” with nothing to back it up. Millions of us are all out of hope. We need action and he seems a little slow to the punch. We do not believe him and we are tired of being lied to.

    This so-called survey also seems to indicate that at least 97.5% who vote against Obama will do so for reasons other than race. A lot higher percentage of those who vote for him will do so for no other reason than his race.

    • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

      Basically, this bogus poll claims that if you have a negative opinion of Obama then you are a racist.

      It just goes to show that you can create a poll to confirm anything you want.

      • mcpalin hill

        Trixta — its Obama’s way of saying he was too good for us and when he loses its our fault and not his.

        • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

          So true! He refuses to take responsibility for anything. The guy is in major denial.

    • wonderwoman

      I agree with you it looks like the majority of racists and sexist are on the dem side. I never thought I would say that in a million years.

  • http://lesstalkmoreactivism.blogspot.com/ whoframedrudy

    All this weird ‘race stuff’ out of the Obama camp is very strange. I can’t believe they actually think this is going to win votes.

    1. They are in ‘cover our ass’ mode. Nominating Obama over Hillary was a disastrous mistake by the Dems.

    2. Old skool Communists tried to inflame/manipulate black rage to get a piece of Black Power. The netroots know they’ve lost the election. They are moving to ‘Plan B’: trigger violent socialist revolution in the streets after Obama loses. In their warped neo-Communist minds, they think they can hold America hostage to black rage.

    Sorry, neocoms, it’s won’t work. Blacks are not going to riot over Obama’s defeat. There will be protests, marches, gatherings, reassessments, and a need for healing. But when the neo-communist leeches come into black neighborhoods trying to stir people up, they’ll find out what we really think of them.

    • mcpalin hill

      whoframedrudy — Has Obama ever admitted to making a mistake? Its always our fault because we don’t understand him. How could most of us understand why he would hang with rappers who attack and demean women? How could we ordinary low information voters understand why all the people he’s close to hate this country and its people? I’m glad Obama seems to understand that he is going to lose. Now the rest of us can get about fixing the mess he created.

  • http://www.dalikos.com danny

    I have concluded that Obama is the most racist/sexist presidential candidate ever.

    His capture of almost all black voters appears to indicate racism vs whites on their part.

    His habitual race baiting is shameless.

    Then there is the problem of his experience,associations, judgements, flip/flops, lies, etc.

    Hillary/Nobama 4 me. I,m very happy with the McCain/Palin ticket.

    From a fan from MN.

  • Horse with no Name

    The converse argument of that is…what about the throngs of people who ARE voting for him simply BECAUSE he is black?
    When I caucused here in Texas…the majority of our precinct went for obama because I live in a rural area and was paired into an inner city precinct that was predominantly black.
    I asked SEVERAL of them WHY they were voting for obama. They couldn’t cite his policies, any legislation, the only answer they could give me was that “he was black”.
    I’m sorry…it is just as racist to vote FOR someone because of race as it is to vote AGAINST someone for the same reason.
    And for some reason…I believe ALL of the racists votes cancel each other out.

    • mcpalin hill

      horse with no name — When Obama played the race card to win in N. Carolina he marginalized himself as the Black Candidate. He did it to himself. But of course its our fault — because nothing is ever his fault.

  • mcpalin hill

    I don’t care what they call it–Obama will lose because he has no respect for the American people. He thinks all he has to do is hang with rich people and bribe the media and its all going to happen for him. Well he has turned a lot of us off with his arrogance. Even Bush Sr. understood that when you run for President of this country you don’t talk down to people. You act like you’re one of them. Obama has no experience so how could he know that he insulted so many of us. Then there are his hugely expensive speeches. They might turn him on but in an economy like this — they are too over the top for most of us.

    I’m sure there are those who will not vote for Obama because they won’t vote for an AA but for the rest of us who won’t vote for Obama because he is not presidential.

    I have read a version of this same article by Claire McCaskill. This is Obama’s excuse for why he will lose. Its another way to moan about us mean Americans who won’t vote for him because he doesn’t look like the presidents on our money.

  • http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508 Beowulf

    Personally, I think the Yahoo/AP article, like OJ and Micheal Jackson who are obviously “1000% innocent” and victims of blatant white racism, is totally correct in that the “typical white person” is “bitter… and… clings to… antipathy towards those who are not like them… antipathy towards immigrants.

    It’s truly horrible that “for the first time in [their] adult lifetime[s]“, whites have the chance to vote for a black man, indeed The One™, yet they simply refuse to.

    God bless America?

    [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] “Nah, nah, nah. GOD DAMN America!

    ———————————————–

    Generally speaking, invoking OJ is extremely racist, but it was none other than Jesse Jackson Jr., an Obama campaign co-chair, who compared Obama to OJ back in January, wherein the implication was blatantly obvious: ALL white people are RACIST. Not only was Jesse Jr. race-baiting, he was also gender-baiting. And of course, he was [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] WRONG!

    [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR]

    Source: http://www.slate.com/id/2181356/

    Nevermind that in 2000, when in a debate against Hillary, Rick Lazio’s overly aggressive (personal space invading) tactics completely backfired on him. [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] Same for Gore vs Bush in 2000, when Gore was trying to physically intimidate Bush in one of the presidential debates, which also completely backfired. [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] Is Dubya a woman?

    More importantly, never mind that Obama went on one vicious attack after another (i.e. race-baiting, gender-baiting, character assassinating) against Hillary, throughout the primaries, and the corporate media, which was egging him on the whole time, deliberately and repeatedly asked the LOADED question: “Does Obama need to go negative?” As if he wasn’t… [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] .

    Or how about in those mock debates on Leno, where the actor playing Obama repeatedly called Hillary a “[DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] !”. The nearly all [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] audience loved it, indeed they couldn’t get enough. I guess OJ got away with murder again. Imagine what would have happened to NBC and Leno if the actress playing Hillary repeatedly called Obama a “[DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR] “?

    [DELETED BY ADMINISTRATOR]

    • http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508 Beowulf

      For those who don’t have a clue…

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNrlSn7ndAA

      In this little YouTube vid of Jesse Jackson Jr. “analysing” Hillary’s tears, he is saying:

      1. Hillary is normally an icy cold bitch. (Indeed, Leno often jokes precisely about this.) This is clearly SEXISM on Jesse Jr.’s part.

      2. Since she is normally an icy cold bitch, ergo her tears must be fake. She is clearly playing the gender card to woo New Hamsphire’s women voters. Again, it is none other than Jesse Jr. is playing the GENDER CARD.

      3. Jesse Jr. also explicitly mentions the upcoming S. Carolina primary which is virtually dominated by the black vote, (i.e. S. Carolina is a hardcore GOP red state where whites vote overwhelmingly republican, which in turn means the sizable black population naturally dominates the democratic primary.) He explicitly invokes Katrina, rhetorically asking why Hillary didn’t cry for Katrina’s victims, i.e. for blacks. This portion of his diatribe is clearly RACE-BAITING intended to bring out the black vote in the upcoming S. Carolina primary. Katrina is in fact explicitly invoked twice, once at about 0min26sec and again at about 1min06sec in the linked YouTube vid.

      (Of course, w.r.t. the S. Carolina primary, the real race-baiting by camp Obama was againt Bill: Bill’s comparison of Obama to Jesse Jackson and Bill’s statement that Obama’s revisionist stance on Iraq was “a total fairy tale“, which was deliberately misinterpreted as Bill calling Obama, the black candidate, a total fairy tale, i.e. Mr. Affirmative Action. (But then again, even that misinterpretation would have still been FACTUALLY CORRECT: Obama is the most unaccomplished presidential candidate, with the thinnest resume–or if you prefer, the thickest padded resume, of any major party in the history of the United States–a fundamental fact which even Chris “shivers up my leg” Matthews has had to admit.)

      For its part, the corporate media initially suggested that Hillary would lose New Hampshire precisely because of her tears, (i.e. not tough enough to be president), only to do a craven 180 degree about face to say she won precisely because of them. Of course, the corporate media was also very busy at this time nitpicking Hillary’s pant suits and hair style, i.e. “ugly frogs”, talking polls and pretty much about anything else but relevant issues. They were also falling all over themselves–pretending to be in love with Obama.

      Hint: The liberals in front of the camera love Obama, but the SUITS who run the corporate media behind the sceces do NOT. It is the SUITS run the CORPORATE media, not the liberals.

  • ugsome

    Corrente joins the scapegoating game:

    http://www.correntewire.com/how_pissed_are_white_women

    This vile piece of calumny pegs all white women as fat, lazy, spoiled latte sippers who have nothing to complain about, then calls white women racist.

    Clearly the groundwork is being laid to place blame for any Obama loss at white women’s (read: Hillary’s) feet.

    Some of us white women think racism is too serious a matter to be abused and cheapened this way. Some of us think our nation was cheated out of first-rate leadership because that millions couldn’t stand the thought of leadership in feminine form. Some of us know how deeply scornful is the Obama campaign towards us.

    Some of us aren’t buying this shit at all.

    • http://www.progressive.org/mag_reed0508 Beowulf

      Clearly the groundwork is being laid to place blame for any Obama loss at white women’s (read: Hillary’s) feet.

      Yeah, no shit. The corporate media gender-baited (on top of the scurrilous race-baiting and vicious character assassination) the HELL out of Hillary until she dropped out. After she dropped out in early June, sexism suddenly became an issue–and certainly a HUGE issue when Sarah Palin came along.

      If Barack O’Bullshit loses, they will blame Hillary for it, i.e. race-bait her once more to divide the traditional Democratic coalition of women, minorities (blacks), and labor.

      I predict that in 2012 or 2016, Hillary will once again be called Tonya Harding or some equally vicious equivalent. GOP women, as they did during the primaries of this year, will not only NOT come to her defense as they are sort of doing now for obvious reasons, but will in fact lead the charge.

    • http://ladyboomernyc.wordpress.com/ trixta

      I happen to be brown—and I will not vote for Obama! Of course, according to the Obama camp Hispanics are racists too.

    • Northwest rain

      Witchcraze: A New History of the European Witch Hunts, by Anne Llewellyn Barstow.

      Ann Barstow begins this book with a review of the current state of misogyny world wide. India — murdering the wife (reason: poor dowry.) There are so many other countries that don’t value female lives, including the USA. The US can’t even pass the ERA.

      Blame the white women and then murder the women, for the crime of being witches.

      Today it is Blame the white women and the ??? the women, for the crime of being white women and therefore racist???

      Unfortunately women will be the easy and historical target to blame for whatever imagined reason by a bunch of Neanderthal males and young nasty women (who believe they will NEVER get old).

      It is damned easy to manipulate a mob — and Obama’s cult followers are a mindless mob, willing to do his bidding, willing to do anything to gain favor with “the ONE”.

      Obama’s mob uses whatever means to terrorize anyone who disagrees with “the ONE”.

      I did not expect to see theories taught in college Behavior Science classes used by sociopaths in order to steal the White House. These are dangerous people.

      • Northwest rain

        ignore the double post below —

        Sorry — WordPress glitch –

    • Northwest rain

      Wordpress is having glitches again — second try.

      Witchcraze: A New History of the European Witch Hunts, by Anne Llewellyn Barstow.

      Ann Barstow begins this book with a review of the current state of misogyny world wide. India — murdering the wife (reason: poor dowry.) There are so many other countries that don’t value female lives, including the USA. The US can’t even pass the ERA.

      Blame the white women and then murder the women, for the crime of being witches.

      Today it is Blame the white women and the ??? the women, for the crime of being white women and therefore racist???

      Unfortunately women will be the easy and historical target to blame for whatever imagined reason by a bunch of Neanderthal males and young nasty women (who believe they will NEVER get old).

      It is damned easy to manipulate a mob — and Obama’s cult followers are a mindless mob, willing to do his bidding, willing to do anything to gain favor with “the ONE”.

      Obama’s mob uses whatever means to terrorize anyone who disagrees with “the ONE”.

      I did not expect to see theories taught in college Behavior Science classes used by sociopaths in order to steal the White House. These are dangerous people.

  • Ani

    I will not be blamed because I use common sense. There is no way any reasonable person could think this dishonest, flip-flopping man who was barely elected to the Senate before he started running for President is qualified to lead our country during a time of horrible financial crisis at home and two wars abroad.

    This is absolutely inane.

    I do not know what the DNC thought it was going to accomplish by putting their fingers on the scale to tip it in Senator Obama’s favor, but to watch his behavior and see how he has thrown every policy under the bus, one would have to be completely irrational to assume this man is capable of stepping up to the plate and leading this country in the best of times, much less in the midst of such a crisis.

    In the state senate, he voted present 130 times -not yes, not no — present. He hit the ‘wrong’ button six times. That is indicative of someone who is incapable of making a decision and/or someone who is afraid to lose favor with the right/wrong people and thus is lacking in moral courage.

    Not a good prescription for the Presidency.

    He has never had to make a tough vote — he has ducked out on many, in fact. He never voted on the IWR — he was not even in the Senate at the time, but merely the state legislature.

    He has reversed his positions on FISA, NAFTA, Iraq, Israel, women’s rights, gay rights, — don’t ask don’t tell, public financing, he touts Reaganomics and says Republicans are the party of good ideas. He now touts Bush’s faith based initiatives and wants to keep Blackwater going and have private security forces. Are you joking??

    This is a Democrat?

    He is a sexist who has misrepresented and disrespected Hillary and her 18 million voters and has called the best president we have had in many years a racist.

    You call this a Democrat?

    For all of the above reasons, I will not vote for him.

    Will someone please have the decency to stop the hype and honestly tell me what any of this has to do with the man’s race?

  • Fenelon spoke

    Yes, racism will be blamed if Obama loses and it has already been set up by some people than this IS the reason, A recent article in a New York Magazine said as much. This gives a hook to white liberals who might otherwise vote for Nader because Obama has turned his back on progressive stands. However, as an African American colleague of mine told me several months ago,
    “Obama is bad news. His race does not mean he is qualified to be President” , However, this colleague is very selective about whom he tells this to and I understand the reason why.

  • notodisenfranchisement

    I asked some liberal women why they loathe Palin, and one said:

    “Because she is a perfect example of an unqualified female who has been promoted to a position, simply because of her sex.”

    ****
    And I thought:

    But cannot this be said of Obama?

    “Because he is a perfect example of an unqualified male who has been promoted to a position, simply because of his sex (and race).”

  • Gayle in Oregon

    I dont care why Obama loses votes as long as he LOSES!

  • hootnannie

    Obama wanted to be three different candidates: the brother for black voters, the post-racial messiah for young folks, and the racial healer for older whites. His doting media followers rarely spoke of race, even after Michelle injected it and then all sorts of Obamaniacs jumped on the race-baiting bandwagon during the SC primary. What kind of wet noodle does a white person have to be to serviley nod his/her head when people like the Clintons are branded racists? Most people stiffened their spines and became even more rigid when Rev. Wright and his congregation spewed shocking anti-white bigotry. Whites who may have never been racists no doubt became just that after months of being derided for their ethnicity. But the bottom line is that the vote-for-Barack-or-you’re-a-racist threat ran out of victims long ago when all the white-guilt liberals succumbed. Now the other side is just waiting for election day to have its say. The Obamaniacs can scream “Racism!” all they want for as long as they want. Bobo still will be the loser.

  • Lucy

    The question is rigged.

    I would agree with the statement, but I believe any person will do better if they try harder. I’m hispanic, I have a full-time job, I’m going to college, and I support a family of four. Three years ago I was on welfare. I am more well off because I try hard to do so. I could have sat back and done nothing, and I’m sure there are people that do just that. But I don’t think the question would reveal if a person was racist.

  • Steve-O

    I consider myself as a Democrat, but that does not mean that I switch off my brain when it comes to voting.

    I never liked Obama in the first place and that had nothing to do with the color of his skin, more with his inexperience, his jumping the line, his abandoning his senate post before he even finished his first term in office and because he made the color of his skin an issue to gain on his opponents.

    I look at the candidates, weight the issues and the statements, take into account what I consider important. I weight Obama and he has to be considered as too light. I miss conviction, passion, believes. All he offers for me are slogans „Change you can believe in“ and he tells me that I should not take a chance on him, but on me. Nice works, clever rhetoric, but in the end, I still don’t know what he stands for. I do know what I stand for, but there is no guarantee that Obama will stand for the same things. Besides, it is not my job to create a fantasy about a leader and do anything to get him elected, it is HIS job to convince ME that HE will do what I want him to do. I am not the one I have been waiting for, I expect a supposed leader to show me that he has it in him to lead and to deal with the problems. If that guy is a cripple as FDR was or if the guy is a black guy does not make a difference for me, but he has to convince me.

    So far, Obama has failed miserably in that respect and that has nothing to do with the color of his skin. More with his constant flip-flops and race baiting, if everything else fails.

    I wonder where the articles are that point out that McCain might lose the election due to racism. 90% of the black voters vote for Obama because of the color of his skin. That’s rasicm too, don’t you think?

  • b mathews

    OBAMA CAN TAKE HIS FAKE PRESIDENTIAL SEAL, HIS FAKE (ISLAM) LOGO, HIS “IN YOUR FACE” FOLLOWERS, HIS ANGRY UNPATRIOTIC ANTI-WHITE WIFE, HIS PLANS TO DESTROY AMERICA, HIS TAKE FROM THE RICH AND GIVE TO THE POOR POLICIES, HIS UNSAVORY CONNECTIONS AND HIS “OKEY DOKE” AND SHUFFLE OFF TO BUFFA…ER I MEAN CHICAGO.

  • JC

    Media Caught Fabricating Racism Story

    http://tiny.cc/kuWFT

  • Obamassiah

    I can’t believe this. The news medias technique to push the election to Obama. The amount of African Americans voting for Obama are 95% to Mccains 2%. Why doesn’t the media point out this issue. 95 to 2 is not a vote for the best nominee it is point blank race voting, no if’s and or buts. A Friend of mine (white) Obama supporter said to me the other day “how can you not vote for Obama, do you have any idea of the historical moment of electing a black man.” I responded “yes, I do, but it is obvious that Obama has no understanding of the historical moment this presents for blacks. If he had a clue he would have given African Americans their first president by choosing hillary as his vp. Instead he put Dean, Pelosi, Brazile and most obibiously his wife Michelle’s opinion before the African American voters. So, why should I cast my vote for an incompetent man, simply to move forward a cause that HE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT. I will vote for a black man the moment that one is nominated, that unlike Obama actually cares about black voters (instead of playing them) and is competent.

  • emmaps

    You Hillary worshipers are pathetic.

  • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

    Oh I don’t really care who he blames. He always blames somebody else for what he is. I am just sick of his lying socialist face and mouth and can’t wait to help kick his ass back to Chicago thug land.

    I am sick and tired of being threatened. There are plenty of reasons Barack Obama is a dangerous man and his color is the least of them. I don’t trust him with my country. I don’t trust him with my life. And FOR SURE I don’t trust him with my rights as a human being without a penis. So he can kiss my ass and blame racisim all he wants. People are sick and tired of his race card and it doesn’t even affect them any longer. He has set back gender and racial relations back 40 years and he did it all on purpose for his own gain. I have about as much guilt over that pig as he has over me.

    Screw Barack Obama.

  • Kelly & Brad 4McCain/Palin

    Give us a break! Here they goe again hopeing it will work-Well I am sick,just sick of Obama’s flips flops-The media-His false ads-and all his lies.And yes I am talking about BARKY..As if we don’t know as if we can’t we see Obama doesn’t like being questioned which is perhaps the reason he backed down,check his past and now voting bills-As if we don’t hear his flip flops-As if we don’t her or see the media on how they mistreated Hillary so bad-s if we didn’t see Obama do it as well-As if we hear his lies-well Barky go to he ** and the dnc and you had trashed your pwn party.I am nolonger a democratic.I am now independent and yes.I am voteing McCain/Palin..And there is nothing or noone who can change my mind,I saw enough and it’s still going on today.The media got a hold of a sick stick ,AND MANY OF THEM AT THAT.

    McCain /Palin 08 Country First.

    Protesting Barack Obama

    Posted: 21 Sep 2008 11:28 AM CDT

    Looks like the golden child is finally being called on his lies, by more than just Fact Check .org, as I wrote about earlier.

    Hat Tip to Stop The ACLU, we see Obama doesn’t like being questioned which is perhaps the reason he backed down,check his past and now voting bills-As if we don’t hear his flip flops-As if we don’t her or see the media on how they mistreated Hillary so bad-s if we didn’t see Obama do it as well-As if we hear his lies-well Barky go to he ** and the dnc and you had trashed your pwn party.I am nolonger a democratic.I am now independent and yes.I am voteing McCain/Palin..And there is nothing or noone who can change my mind,I saw enough and it’s still going on today.The media got a hold of a sick stick …

    went against his “anywhere, anytime” statement for townhall meetings.

    He doesn’t like being called out on his lies and goes as far as to yell at old ladies when they dare question “The One.”

    Very short video below:

    Last week, Obama had blacks in Coral Gables, Florida, interrupting his speech with signs and protests, some signs saying “Blacks against Obama.” (Video here)

    In Jacksonville Florida, he has people protesting him by air, with a plane flying over his head with a banner that read, “Raising taxes is not patriotic.”

    That was in reference to Joe Biden’s comment about how paying taxes is patriotic.

    The New Hampshire Union Leader Paper has a blistering editorial calling him out as a liar as well.

    Yet here he is violating his own professed standards. This is not the Barack Obama so many voters in New Hampshire and elsewhere thought they knew. But it is the real Barack Obama. For despite his rhetoric, he is in fact campaigning so dishonestly that even The Washington Post and The New York Times have called him on it. Which means that he is in practice no different from those regular politicians against whom his entire campaign has been built.

    Read the whole thing, they have quite a list.

    Looks like people are finally waking up to what Barack Obama really is.

    A liar.

    Finally the masked man is being revealed.

    .
    Fact Check Calls Barack Obama Out On More Social Security Lies

    Posted: 21 Sep 2008 10:13 AM CDT

    Barack Obama is keeping those researchers over at Fact Check .org pretty busy lately and yesterday they called him out on falsehoods and “rank misrepresentation”, in a piece they called “Scaring Seniors” and today they say “Obama personally fed senior citizens another whopper,” on Saturday.

    Summary.

    In Daytona Beach, Obama said that “if my opponent had his way, the millions of Floridians who rely on it would’ve had their Social Security tied up in the stock market this week.” He referred to “elderly women” at risk of poverty, and said families would be scrambling to support “grandmothers and grandfathers.”

    That’s not true. The plan proposed by President Bush and supported by McCain in 2005 would not have allowed anyone born before 1950 to invest any part of their Social Security taxes in private accounts. All current retirees would be covered by the same benefits they are now.

    Obama would have been correct to say that many workers under age 58 would have had some portion of their Social Security benefits affected by the current market turmoil – if they had chosen to participate. And market drops would be a worry for those who retire in future decades. But current retirees would not have been affected.

    They use words like “highly distorted”, “whopper”, all making it clear that Obama is directly, deliberately, lying to the elderly to confuse them.

    Read the whole thing…

    .
    Flags of Our Fathers: On Patriotism and Lies

    Posted: 21 Sep 2008 12:24 AM CDT

    On one fundamental maxim all professional propagandists would agree: It you repeat a lie often enough and loudly enough, sooner or later it becomes accepted truth. Considering the long ignoble record of relentless and vociferous attacks by the Communist-inspired left on our American history, it’s a wonder that there can be any true American patriots left.

    Immediately following World War Two, and up until this present hour, we have been, and are still being, assaulted with vicious and totally unsubstantiated lies and distortions about the history of our great nation. These outrageous falsifications have been repeated so often by so many that they have indeed become accepted truth. What is worse, however, is the almost total lack of counter arguments and effective rebuttals. The voices of truth, that is, the voices of dissent, have been so weak and limp-wristed that they have been all but useless against this cynical onslaught of manipulative slander. To be an unabashed patriot in this present atmosphere of self-loathing and eagerly embraced guilt is to be an extremist, an ignorant, chest-thumping redneck. The cynics hold the high ground now: they have raised their flag of anti-Americanism, and the knowledgeable world applauds.

    The simple patriotism of even the most sincere and committed patriot amongst us is invariably tainted by these insidious lies. We love America, we say to ourselves, despite its failings, despite its long list of tragic and monumental blunders. None of us is perfect, we say. But America comes closer than most. And, besides, we have for the most part admitted our past mistakes and, where possible, made reparations, or at the very least issued heartfelt apologies to our purported victims.

    This, my friends, is how deeply we’ve been penetrated by the enemy’s successful propaganda assault. We have embraced their ingenious lies and incorporated them into our national narrative. Seldom, if ever, do we take the time to actually investigate them. After all, we have received these lessons from some of our most credible sources, our teachers, our politicians, our historians and our media. Why should we doubt them?

    The tedious litany of America’s bloody blunders, that well-publicized list of American mistakes and American atrocities is just too long to attack, item by item, here in this limited space. But perhaps by tackling just a few of the most popular lies in our anti-Americanist’s propaganda arsenal we can hopefully raise some doubts about the veracity of some of the others. Maybe, with just a little research into this worthy subject, we can learn — as I have learned — to love America because of our history, and not despite it.

    Read more at Radarsite
    Video- Barack Obama’s Support of Infanticide

    Posted: 20 Sep 2008 05:33 PM CDT

    Jill Stanek, speaks in the video below, was a nurse that witnessed cases of infanticide, babies born alive after failed abortions, and she testified on a national level about how those children were put in a room, alone, and left to die.

    Watch the video to know the type of person Barack Obama really is when he voted, three times, against the Born Alive Act, which would have forced care for children born alive after a failed abortion attempt.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIdbYjmbFzo

    This video has been watched, as of right now, more than 1,564,621 times and anyone that could vote for Barack Obama after understanding that he supports infanticide…deserves what they get.

    I had trouble embedding the video above, so I have found another where Stanek speaks to Fox News about Barack Obama being the only Senator to speak out against the Born Alive Act, which would make it mandatory to give these babies born alive medial care.

    That video is embedded below, but I truly suggest you watch the one linked above as well.

    .
    Fact Check.Org: Obama Ad Against McCain A ‘Rank Misrepresentation’

    Posted: 20 Sep 2008 01:12 PM CDT

    FactCheck.org says the new Obama-Biden ad claiming John McCain’s Social Security (SS) plan would cut SS benefits in half is a “falsehood” and a “rank misrepresentation” which would scare senior citizens who rely on SS checks.

    According to Fact Check in an article titled “Scaring Seniors” the “promise” ad says John McCain voted for privatizing social security and quotes him as saying he “campaigned in support of President Bush’s proposal.”

    That is true, as shown by John McCain saying in March of 2008, “I’m totally in favor of personal savings accounts and I think they are an important opportunity for young workers. I campaigned in support of President Bush’s proposal and I campaigned with him, and I did town hall meetings with him.”

    The ad implies that Bush’s plan bets the whole lot of Social Security funds on unstable stocks. In fact, it would have “privatized” only a small portion of Social Security taxes that Americans could have invested in private accounts, if they chose to do so.

    The “rank misrepresentation” come in when the Obama ad claims it would cut “benefits in half.”

    Fact check states:

    Nobody now getting benefits, or even close to retirement, would have seen any reduction in benefits or cost-of-living adjustments under the plan Bush proposed in April, 2005. What Bush proposed – in addition to creating private Social Security accounts – was to hold down the growth of benefits received by those retiring in the future. He embraced a proposal for “progressive price indexing” of future benefits. This would have been a “cut” only in relation to what the current formula would produce for future retirees, assuming that taxes are increased sufficiently to keep the system going.

    The “price indexing” would have tied the growth to the rate of price inflation, rather than to the growth of wages, as is the case now. Wages have historically risen faster than prices, so the current wage-indexed system pushes benefits for future retirees up faster than the rate of inflation. The “progressive” part would have held down the growth only for higher-income and middle-income workers, while allowing benefits for lower-income workers to rise in line with the current wage-based formula.

    Fact Check goes on to point out the claims in the new ad attempts to use a report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities written by Jason Furman, with Furman now being one of Obama’s top economic advisers, then finds the report they are documenting to make their claims actually is “quite different from what the ad claims.”

    They end their fact checking by saying ads like the Obama-Biden as “misinform” the public and only make the job of fixing the system more difficult.

    .
    You are subscribed to email updates from Wake up America
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner
    Inbox too full? Subscribe to the feed version of Wake up America in a feed reader.
    If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: Wake up America, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor, Chicago IL USA 60610

  • SportPolitics

    I’m not voting for him because he has flappy ears, and I can’t stand flappy ears. I thought the elite had them pinned back, must have gone out of style mid century.
    So you know, call me an ear bigot, who cares. I’m not having ears flapping at me for 4 years. No way.
    He’s lanky too, no lanky freaks with flappy ears, forget it. Lucky he doesn’t have a triangle head.
    Bush is crosseyed.
    McCain is a weeble wobbling but it doesn’t fall down.
    Palin is ok, nothing driving me nuts there yet.
    Hillary is ok, too. People make fun of her hips but Michelle Obama has that problem not Hillary.
    Biden is ok except when he opens his mouth, so forget him.
    Cheney doesn’t bother me, he is a barrel, but I expect that type of barrel from a pol. So strangely enough he passes.
    Anyway too many freaks up there. Get some normal looking people.
    Larry Johnson for instance is a normal looking person.
    Boehner on the repub side is normal looking.
    Ried is a freak, Pelosi is a freak, Newt is weird looking, take giganto rear end himself from Illinois
    Henry Hyde, now there’s an anomaly.
    Ok, so out with the flappy ears lanky weirdo.
    Purple lips is a negative, too.
    Since we have all this socio psychology front and center 100% of the time in politics, let’s just rule out te visual freaks from the get go. They’re always going to do something strange because their inner children are injured from being such outcasts their entire lives.
    That doesn’t mean we need hollywood hotties either, as the screen and the twisted “artists eye” has some real freaks in the top looks billing coming out of hollywood, almost all of em are real doozies in person.
    How about some normal people whose looks wouldn’t frighten if you just met them ?
    There, now all the anti-anti people can have a gigantic fit.

  • Howard

    THE RACISM RED HERRING …
    If Obama can get Americans to base the election on racism,
    then it will take their attention off the fact that he has no experience,
    no credentials, and no issues.