<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pet Peeve Open Thread [Update at end]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaddysDarlin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-765934</link>
		<dc:creator>DaddysDarlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-765934</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I agree, I read the articles everyday and sometimes have something to say that isnt right on topic, but I figure its ok.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I agree, I read the articles everyday and sometimes have something to say that isnt right on topic, but I figure its ok.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat in your hat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764600</link>
		<dc:creator>kat in your hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764600</guid>
		<description>Poll: Clinton backers still think less of Obama 
http://news.aol.com/article/poll-clinton-backers-still-think-less-of/184532?cid=3272</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll: Clinton backers still think less of Obama<br />
<a href="http://news.aol.com/article/poll-clinton-backers-still-think-less-of/184532?cid=3272" rel="nofollow">http://news.aol.com/article/poll-clinton-backers-still-think-less-of/184532?cid=3272</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat in your hat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764594</link>
		<dc:creator>kat in your hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764594</guid>
		<description>September 23, 2008 
Obama Dollars
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_dollars.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 23, 2008<br />
Obama Dollars<br />
<a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_dollars.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_dollars.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat in your hat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764240</link>
		<dc:creator>kat in your hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764240</guid>
		<description>September 23, 2008
Obama Dollars
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_dollars.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 23, 2008<br />
Obama Dollars<br />
<a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_dollars.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_dollars.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat in your hat</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764187</link>
		<dc:creator>kat in your hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-764187</guid>
		<description>Video surfaces of Barack Obama admitting he doesn&#039;t understand the Stock Market

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjaoJuAYnaI&amp;eurl=http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video surfaces of Barack Obama admitting he doesn&#8217;t understand the Stock Market</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjaoJuAYnaI&#038;eurl=http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjaoJuAYnaI&#038;eurl=http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763764</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763764</guid>
		<description>Found something else that&#039;s interesting, yep still searching some things. From the Citizens Against Wasteful Spending which is a non-partisan group.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Greg Jarrett, Fox: You focused on two things really as I understand it, earmarks, and we will get to it in a moment, but wasteful spending talk to us about how the candidates break down on this.
Tom Schatz, CAGW: There is a long track record in both cases, some of which goes to Senator Obama in the Illinois Legislature. We do not analyze the states. But just on the votes in 2007, Senator Obama voted correctly only 10% of the time, and Senator McCain voted 11 out of the 35 times. He did vote correctly every time. His lifetime rating 88% is the sixth-highest in the Senate. Senator Obama’s lifetime rating is 18% in the years that he has been a Senator. So there is a vast difference on the question of spending and taxes and those results are consistent with other analyses and organizations that track all of these various votes.
Jarrett: Is Obama at the bottom?
Schatz: He is not quite at that the bottom. Actually, Senator Biden is at the bottom. He has a zero rating in 2007. But Senator Obama is pretty close at 10%.
Jarrett: So Biden would be the most wasteful in your judgment, and again you are a non-partisan group, would be the most wasteful Senator?
Schatz: He wasn’t the only one. There were 13 Senators with a zero rating, but he was one of those that failed to vote a single time to cut waste or cut taxes are even preserve tax cuts.
Jarrett: And again, we are out of time, but John McCain, zero earmarks. Right?
Schatz: That is it. Zero.
Jarrett: Big goose egg. I mean that is amazing in Congress.
Schatz: It is difficult to say no, but he is one of the few who has.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Link to video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLe3_1a_KUs
Link to full article from HotAir:
http://tinyurl.com/3z7wwl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found something else that&#8217;s interesting, yep still searching some things. From the Citizens Against Wasteful Spending which is a non-partisan group.</p>
<blockquote><p>Greg Jarrett, Fox: You focused on two things really as I understand it, earmarks, and we will get to it in a moment, but wasteful spending talk to us about how the candidates break down on this.<br />
Tom Schatz, CAGW: There is a long track record in both cases, some of which goes to Senator Obama in the Illinois Legislature. We do not analyze the states. But just on the votes in 2007, Senator Obama voted correctly only 10% of the time, and Senator McCain voted 11 out of the 35 times. He did vote correctly every time. His lifetime rating 88% is the sixth-highest in the Senate. Senator Obama’s lifetime rating is 18% in the years that he has been a Senator. So there is a vast difference on the question of spending and taxes and those results are consistent with other analyses and organizations that track all of these various votes.<br />
Jarrett: Is Obama at the bottom?<br />
Schatz: He is not quite at that the bottom. Actually, Senator Biden is at the bottom. He has a zero rating in 2007. But Senator Obama is pretty close at 10%.<br />
Jarrett: So Biden would be the most wasteful in your judgment, and again you are a non-partisan group, would be the most wasteful Senator?<br />
Schatz: He wasn’t the only one. There were 13 Senators with a zero rating, but he was one of those that failed to vote a single time to cut waste or cut taxes are even preserve tax cuts.<br />
Jarrett: And again, we are out of time, but John McCain, zero earmarks. Right?<br />
Schatz: That is it. Zero.<br />
Jarrett: Big goose egg. I mean that is amazing in Congress.<br />
Schatz: It is difficult to say no, but he is one of the few who has.</p></blockquote>
<p>Link to video:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLe3_1a_KUs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLe3_1a_KUs</a><br />
Link to full article from HotAir:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3z7wwl" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3z7wwl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi everyone</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763668</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi everyone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763668</guid>
		<description>Hate to change the subject Obama and his wife and Dean will all be in the Philadelphia area tomorrow Campaining so they say.Thats Weird the same day that Bergs lawsuit was to be answered.You no the one his followers call a lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to change the subject Obama and his wife and Dean will all be in the Philadelphia area tomorrow Campaining so they say.Thats Weird the same day that Bergs lawsuit was to be answered.You no the one his followers call a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763574</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763574</guid>
		<description>http://tinyurl.com/3po2ul
I also found this in an update on it on Michelle Malkin&#039;s site. I&#039;m sorry if it&#039;s already been posted I&#039;ve been out of town a few days and still trying to catch up on reading, clicking on links, etc. I was trying to look for a better Hillary video than the one posted, plus I missed most of the interview she just did, and this came up in the searches for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3po2ul" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3po2ul</a><br />
I also found this in an update on it on Michelle Malkin&#8217;s site. I&#8217;m sorry if it&#8217;s already been posted I&#8217;ve been out of town a few days and still trying to catch up on reading, clicking on links, etc. I was trying to look for a better Hillary video than the one posted, plus I missed most of the interview she just did, and this came up in the searches for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canucklehead</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763557</link>
		<dc:creator>canucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763557</guid>
		<description>Oh! Oh! Oh! Think on This! I just heard a caller on a radio show state that if Obama loses It will be because white America is racist. The guy then said that since Republicans will vote for McCain anyway that must mean its the Democrats that are the RACISTS! Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! Oh! Oh! Think on This! I just heard a caller on a radio show state that if Obama loses It will be because white America is racist. The guy then said that since Republicans will vote for McCain anyway that must mean its the Democrats that are the RACISTS! Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763534</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763534</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It is also likely that the PR firm was paid by outside sources to run the smear campaign. While not conclusive, evidence suggests a link to the Barack Obama campaign. Namely:

Evidence suggests that a YouTube video with false claims about Palin was uploaded and promoted by members of a professional PR firm.
The family that runs the PR firm has extensive ties to the Democratic Party, the netroots, and are staunch Obama supporters.
Evidence suggests that the firm engaged in a concerted effort to distribute the video in such a way that it would appear to have gone viral on its own. Yet this effort took place on company time.
Evidence suggests that these distribution efforts included actions by at least one employee of the firm who is unconnected with the family running the company.
The voice-over artist used in this supposedly amateur video is a professional.
This same voice-over artist has worked extensively with David Axelrod&#039;s firm, which has a history of engaging in phony grassroots efforts, otherwise known as &quot;astroturfing.&quot; 
David Axelrod is Barack Obama&#039;s chief media strategist.
The same voice-over artist has worked directly for the Barack Obama campaign.
This suggests that false rumors and outright lies about Sarah Palin and John McCain being spread on the internet are being orchestrated by political partisans and are not an organic grassroots phenomenon led by the left wing fringe. Our findings follow.

WHO PRODUCED THE VIDEO?

[UPDATE: Within 1 hour of posting, &quot;eswinner&quot; has removed all videos from YouTube and began removing any traces of his activities. But we have the video and all relevant websites backed up. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

For full article:
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It is also likely that the PR firm was paid by outside sources to run the smear campaign. While not conclusive, evidence suggests a link to the Barack Obama campaign. Namely:</p>
<p>Evidence suggests that a YouTube video with false claims about Palin was uploaded and promoted by members of a professional PR firm.<br />
The family that runs the PR firm has extensive ties to the Democratic Party, the netroots, and are staunch Obama supporters.<br />
Evidence suggests that the firm engaged in a concerted effort to distribute the video in such a way that it would appear to have gone viral on its own. Yet this effort took place on company time.<br />
Evidence suggests that these distribution efforts included actions by at least one employee of the firm who is unconnected with the family running the company.<br />
The voice-over artist used in this supposedly amateur video is a professional.<br />
This same voice-over artist has worked extensively with David Axelrod&#8217;s firm, which has a history of engaging in phony grassroots efforts, otherwise known as &#8220;astroturfing.&#8221;<br />
David Axelrod is Barack Obama&#8217;s chief media strategist.<br />
The same voice-over artist has worked directly for the Barack Obama campaign.<br />
This suggests that false rumors and outright lies about Sarah Palin and John McCain being spread on the internet are being orchestrated by political partisans and are not an organic grassroots phenomenon led by the left wing fringe. Our findings follow.</p>
<p>WHO PRODUCED THE VIDEO?</p>
<p>[UPDATE: Within 1 hour of posting, &#8220;eswinner&#8221; has removed all videos from YouTube and began removing any traces of his activities. But we have the video and all relevant websites backed up. </p></blockquote>
<p>For full article:<br />
<a href="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php" rel="nofollow">http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wry</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763502</link>
		<dc:creator>wry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763502</guid>
		<description>Lark again, I&#039;m not sure which lark I&#039;m responding too.
I wouldn&#039;t expect CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL next to susan&#039;s name. What&#039;s with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lark again, I&#8217;m not sure which lark I&#8217;m responding too.<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t expect CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL next to susan&#8217;s name. What&#8217;s with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocky wacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763453</link>
		<dc:creator>cocky wacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763453</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t it ever give you pause that it is so easy to point out how much of the information on this site is BS?  It is like shooting fish in a barrel.  

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/chart3way.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t it ever give you pause that it is so easy to point out how much of the information on this site is BS?  It is like shooting fish in a barrel.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/chart3way.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/chart3way.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763413</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763413</guid>
		<description>That is a lie. The polls were erratic then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a lie. The polls were erratic then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imustprotest</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763409</link>
		<dc:creator>imustprotest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763409</guid>
		<description>you really are wacko!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you really are wacko!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cocky wacko</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/4973/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763399</link>
		<dc:creator>cocky wacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/22/pet-peeve-open-thread/#comment-763399</guid>
		<description>Bush was up consistently at this point in 2004.  Obama has been ahead consistently except for a short post-convention bounce for McCain.  I hope you are patriotic enough to put your bitterness behind you and support President Obama.  Country first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush was up consistently at this point in 2004.  Obama has been ahead consistently except for a short post-convention bounce for McCain.  I hope you are patriotic enough to put your bitterness behind you and support President Obama.  Country first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

