This time in 2004..there were so many Kerry sings it got to be silly..this year..not a dang Obama sign to be seen!!

and Only a hand full of McCain signs..that tells me people are staying silent about who they are voting for ..not a good sign for Obama..

How many NATO hearings did he hold???..oh none you say,..well then at least that you will have right!

STFU Friz.,.

the dumber than dumb Obamablahblah’s are gravitating here again..i see..

http://www.sj-r.com/news/x650665948/Levine-disbarred-from-practicing-law

I bit. Sorry.

Prescience is a quality of intuition that is akin to seeing the future. At the least, it is a very well-developed foresight, which comes from accurately understanding what will unfold based on an accurate assessment of the meaning of a relevant set of indicators. More than this, it is a “divine attribution.”

Obama has not been prescient on Iraq, Afghanistan,or Pakistan. He might have gave a speech against attacking Iraq in 2002, but in 2004 he said that his position on Iraq was much the same of that as GW. His own youtube available words on video show he was not prescient. Further, for those of us who bothered to read about UNSCOM’s reports on the status of Iraq’s weapons programs, or heard or read Scott Ritter’s research (2001/2) on the subject, knew that it was extremely improbable that the Iraqis had WMDs. The information was publically available before rthe invasion. Prescience was not required.

Obama didn’t need prescience to argue for bolstering the forces in Afghanistan. Congress only supplied the Afghanis with 1/10th of the reconstruction money that was Bush requested. Karzai’s brother complained that this was severely undermining stabilization efforts years ago. One only need study the media outlets of America’s allies in Afghanistan to know that efforts in Afghanistan needed to be bolstered. So much for presicence.

Pakistan is potentially a disaster waiting to happen. This is not surprising. Jessica Stern, one of America’s leading experts on terrorism, stated these circumstances very clearly in “Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill” in 2003. What was Obama’s position on Pakistan before Stern did her research, and her interviews, with both Pakistani ISI officers and officials, or with the Saudi-funded functionaries of the jihadi training madrassahs?

Obama is not prescient, which might be very disappointing to a kool-aid addled acolyte like JKFriz.

Further, wisdom and superior judgment only derive through the practise of judgment. Experience matters. Obama is bright, and could probably best most of the people who post here, but potential not exercised is potential unrealized. His record of exercising judgment on difficult issues is sparse, but when push comes to shove, Obama’s record indicates that he lacks the presence to be more than “present” or do more than acquiesce to FISA-wielding vested interests.

SM

Nobama!!!

He lives about 5 miles from me, and is a great Marylander and a great American. I see a bright future for him. He is honest and upstanding – the type who is exactly the opposite of Barack Obama.

The MSM has staked its reputation on Obama and they will NOT air anything against him no matter how true it is. They’re covering their own behinds now.

JERUSALEM : In spite of Sen. Barack Obama’s claims to the contrary, the Democratic presidential nominee had a close working relationship with former Weathermen terrorist leader William Ayers when the two served alongside each other on a hundred-million-dollar education foundation, according to the group’s own archived records.

The records also show Obama’s and Ayers’ foundation granted money to radical leftist activist causes.

Obama worked closely with terrorist Bill Ayers
Records show collaboration on funding leftists despite claim he’s just ‘a guy’ in neighborhood

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76022