RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

A Debt We Owe Through Blood

Joe Biden caused quite a stir when he equated paying higher taxes with patriotism. Biden told ABC’s Kate Snow:

“We want to take money and put it back in the pocket of middle-class people.” Snow asked: “Anybody making over $250,000…” Biden responded: “Is gonna pay more.” Snow: “Is going to pay more.” Biden: “You got it. It’s time to be patriotic, Kate. Time to jump in. Time to be part of the deal. Time to help get America out of the rut.”

Conservatives predictably went ballistic with their calls of “class warfare”; Obama’s fans thought it brilliant economics.

For those of us who are Democrats, or former Democrats, Joe Biden’s statement was offensive on a different level. Although many of us agree with progressive taxation, Biden’s formulation is deeply offensive. According to Biden, greater taxation equals greater patriotism. This concept fits perfectly with the self-congratulatory world of Whole Foods Nation. Anglachel describes Biden’s target audience as the new elites:

The focus of the [Obama] Democrats is on the winners of the economic realignment, those who managed to win a place in the white collar upper-middle class … [Obama] is the exemplar of a mode of life that, while not as unreachable as that of Bush’s base, is still out of reach of those who do not have the education, acculturation and business contacts to climb up that economic ladder.

Some will argue that Biden is simply practicing liberal class warfare; he is targeting the wealthy and not the “bitter” gun owners of greater Appalachia. I disagree. By using the framework of patriotism, Biden is challenging — to use Anglachel’s parlance — the “Bubbas” and the Archie Bunkers — to ownership of American patriotism.

Biden is telegraphing to Whole Foods Nation that it’s equally patriotic to live in Boulder, Colorado and pay on a 33% tax bracket income as it is to serve in Iraq, like Governor Palin’s son. Or, as a friend in this income bracket told me recently, she “sacrifices” by voting Democratic.

The primary campaign showed that Obama fared well with affluent voters and African Americans. Clinton crushed Obama with middle- and low-income voters. The Pennsylvania primary was a perfect example of Obama’s inability to connect with low-income voters:

The Pennsylvania Democratic primary shared many of the same vote characteristics of other primary states this season – with Clinton winning her core base of union members, less educated and lower income voters and rural voters, and Obama winning voters with more education and income, and black voters.

The attack on blue-collar voters by Obama is what precipitated the civil war now raging in the Democratic party, and Obama’s race-baiting of blue-collar whites has been one of the more depressing episodes in our history as a Party.

Low-income white Democrats are the least likely group to vote Republican, and the assault on this vulnerable group has all the markings of racial and class warfare used for electoral gain. African Americans are all too familiar with politicians playing on prejudices for electoral gain and there is nothing different in this case except for the color of the victims’ skin.

The dishwasher, the waitress at Denny’s, the auto mechanic, the grocery clerk, the nursing assistant, the soldier — all low income Americans — are equally patriotic to anyone living in San Francisco or Hyde Park or the East Village, regardless of the amount they pay in taxes.

I’ve been thinking about Biden’s notion of patriotism for several days. Last night I found a video which captures patriotism in a way still held by much of the country. It’s an old fashioned form of patriotism which is now considered uncouth and looked down upon by the liberal elites. But it’s a type of patriotism once honored by Democrats; it’s a part of what made Democrats the governing party for most of the first half of the last century.

The video is from Ken Burns’ brilliant 1990 documentary The Civil War. I think Sullivan Ballou’s love for his wife Sarah is only matched by his love of country.

Listen to Sullivan Ballou’s words carefully and think about everything he is sacrificing. You won’t hear politicians — except perhaps for John McCain — speak of our beloved country with such a degree selflessness and honor.

Sullivan Ballou wrote to his wife that he was “willing—perfectly willing—to lay down all my joys in this life, to help maintain this Government.” Ballou’s patriotism is echoed by Sarah Palin’s willingness to give her child to the service of our country: “Today is the day that I send my first born, my son, my teenage son overseas…to fight for our country, for democracy for our freedoms.”

Whole Foods Nation hates Sarah Palin for the class she represents. She threatens the self-perception of their own moral superiority on race and their economic “sacrifices.” Giving her son to our nation is not enough to silence the voices of hate.

During the primary campaign, on TPM, billysumday suggested that Bill Clinton was a racist because of his bumpkin origins, totally ignoring that the President was educated at Georgetown, Yale, and Oxford:

Bill’s just a good ole boy from the south, and that’s why we love him. But he didn’t handle himself well in the early stage of this campaign and he knew exactly what he was doing when he mentioned Jesse Jackson and tried to marginalize Obama. Is Bill a racist? No. Did he inject race into the campaign? Yes, even if only inadvertently. I mean, we’ve all heard the clips of Bill’s brother using the n-word over and over again, and all the anecdotal evidence of Bill throwing the n bomb out there. Again, I don’t think Bill’s a racist. But I do think he grew up around a lot of racists, in a really racist state, and he’s been colored by that experience

According to the writer, Bill Clinton is a racist because he grew up surrounded by “Bubbas.” President Clinton is not a perfect man, but anybody who knows anything about Clinton knows that he does not have a racist bone in his body. But the writer is really expressing his own prejudices against low-income whites, particularly southern whites, and he is inferring racism because of Clinton’s humble origins.

Likewise, Joe Biden’s contention that greater taxation equals greater patriotism is the same worldview which reduces a person to their environment and their earnings. Biden’s fallacy becomes obvious if you play it in reverse: the less you pay in taxes equals reduced patriotism. It’s class warfare alright, but a war being fought top-down, against low-income whites, those who are perceived to be too “bitter” and too religious to contribute to the nation in a way valued by Whole Foods Nation. Hillary Clinton “and her supporters had to be turned into racists to avoid discussing the economics interests Obama did not deign to address.”

The “Archie Bunkers” have been deemed the enemy. You will find, therefore, that many of the policies advocated by WFN are inimical to the interests of blue-collar workers. It’s no accident, of course, that Obama mocked this group while he attended a gathering in San Francisco by calling them “bitter.” Evan Bayh, at the time, succinctly described the problem with Obama’s class-based attack:

I think you’re on dangerous ground when you morph that into suggesting that people’s cultural values, whether its religion or hunting and fishing or concerns about trade, are premised solely upon those of kind of anxieties and don’t have a legitimate foundation independent of them

WFN is not interested in improving the opportunities available for blue-collar Americans. They see their pickup trucks and snowmobiles as garish obstacles to an imagined utopia. According to Obama and Biden, it’s not about providing health care for the waitress who works at Denny’s or the mom who sends her son off to Iraq, it’s about getting a tax break for driving a Prius, because, as Joe Biden frames it, those who pay more are “sacrificing” more.

  • HARP
    • Shiloh

      This will go down in history alongside the “Dewey Wins” Newspaper.

      • http://JohnMcCain.com Chockablock “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease?” Opampers

        We can pay our higher Biden/Ohitler taxes with the Obama coins I presume? ;)

        • sowsear

          Don’t buy them at an inflated price. They may be devalued soon.

          • Moira

            Excellent anti-Obama TV ads
            aimed at Values Voters now airing in PA, CO, & NM

            http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/nra-firing-away.html
            http://www.gunbanobama.com/

            Memorable Animated Graphic Tag line on all ads:
            “DEFEND FREEDOM [drumbeat] DEFEAT OBAMA”

            - Another Lifelong Democrat Voting for McCain.

            • http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com M. Simon

              I’m a Republican in Obama’s supposed low income demographic.

              My income is lower than that of the average black in America. How did that happen?

              I know one thing for sure. I didn’t get a job from some low income person. I got one because people with money invested. I’d like to see lower taxes on the rich and more jobs.

              I’d like to see more rich people attracted to America.

              • http://www.youtube.com/user/PaulFVillarreal Paul F. Villarreal

                Bud, brilliant work as ususal. Thank you. Love the “Whole Foods Nation” line. Spot-on. A line I’m sure David Bobo Brooks would appreciate.

                Also on the ‘Bill Clinton as racist’ nonsense, the clown at TPM might want to learn that Bill is an honorary member of the Arkansas Black Hall of Fame (not African-American Hall of Fame; it is named The Black Hall of Fame).

                .

                Brief video I made of Sarah Palin’s whirlwind day yesterday meeting with Hamid Karzai, Alvaro Uribe and Henry Kissinger. Also included is a brief comment on the absurd mainstream media’s pathetic attempt to dictate to both the McCain campaign and the American people how it will cover candidate’s conducting their affairs. The MSM blackened both of its eyes yesterday in a ridiculous display of ineptness and childishness. Fortunately, the McCain camp rolled with the temper tantrum and sated the baby’s whines and the adults took over the proceedings. The video is 1:40 in length:

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDP0DFmQlRE

                • vinnie

                  Paul, thanks for the video. Well done. I find it quite amusing that the msm are throwing a hissy fit over the fact that she wants her meetings to be somewhat private. They wanted her to pull a barry. Something tells me that she has a little more class and smarts to not play the celebrity president for a day.

                • nobamaever09

                  SARAH PALIN did great, and I love every bit of. She told media to “screw Your self” it is my private meeting and “beg off”. Great Sarah, You dont need those hienas in Your face!!!
                  Hillary must show those munsters-media, that She wont put up with them, they absolutely responsible for destroying You chances to be President. It is time to tell media to”f …of”
                  Sarah show us all woman, how strong She and She dont owe nothing to anyone, when meeting is private. That is what “PRIVATE” means!

            • http://chriss chris

              On Fox just now, Megan Kelly just destroyed an OB spokesman who tried to say the ad was a pack of lies. By the end of the interview he was babbling just like his arrogant candidate. Go Megan! She is one tough but fair interviewer and is always prepared with the facts. Great interview.

              • http://chriss chris

                The NRA ad by the way. Sorry.

                • http://www.youtube.com/user/PaulFVillarreal Paul F. Villarreal

                  Thanks, Chris. Can’t wait for the video of this.

                • Lee Ruth

                  So far, I have liked all of the NRA ads. They are well done and interesting. To each his own… I guess.

              • nobamaever09

                Yes Megan, great job, get this guy of our faces to!!! We need someone who is honest and real, not some bouble child!!!

          • Ms. Misdemeanor

            Obama’s Law:

            The bad money drives out the good.

          • bemused

            Can we counterfeit them with our own scrap metal or do they have a copyright protection?

        • sowsear

          Don’t buy at a higher price; they may be devalued soon.

      • HARP

        The worst part is….They are made in England!!!

        So much for protecting the American worker.

        • Lee Ruth

          Birmingham is in Alabama.

      • kgirl1028

        No let them print it. I want a chance to throw it in the gutter, right where he took this election to. Right were he is willing for this country to go. I will never forgive this man for cheating us out of effective leadership. And i’m a woman i can hold a grudge. I can not for give the way he shamed my party or my race, or the way he tried to drag through the gutter my sex.

        • wac for hillary

          Save them. After Obama gets stomped in the GE and the Democratic Party asks for donations, we can send the Obama coins to them.

          • vinnie

            I ain’t giving those fools a dime of my money. Nevah!

    • Kal

      Humor aside, this has to violate some fed regs, if it describes him as pres.

      ??

      • sowsear

        Who’s watching? The man seems to have carte blanche.

      • tzada

        They were made in England, so don’t know if that would apply. Hey he is the ONE so him and his are above the law don’t you know? :(

        • Lee Ruth

          AS I have said, B’ham is in Alabama.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        I can call you the King of Siam–it doesn’t make it true.

        It doesn’t violate any federal regs. It violates the laws of GOOD TASTE, though.

    • Shainzona

      How much change? A nickel or a dime – oh wait, maybe a quarter?

    • Ms. Misdemeanor

      Hopefully Harp:

      Graeme Souness, Trevor Francis, Kevin Keegan, and Kenny Dalglish, will have some coins made too.

      They all passed thru Birmingham one time or another.

      Obama probably could not locate the city with an operative GPS.

      Hilarious link there.

      • wac for hillary

        He probably thinks they are talking about the city in Alabama. No wait, that’s one of those states with gun-totin’, God-fearing non-elites; Obama probably doesn’t know it exists either.

        • Lee Ruth

          It is in Alabama, not England.

    • lark

      The coin will be used to answer the Patriotic question for all Democrats.

      Of whom is the image shown in the coin?

      The pay taxes to the Cesar Obama Messiah and be a patriot. And give him to your adoration.

    • Hispana

      saw it and was absolutely disgusted

  • Shiloh

    I don’t attribute that much thought to Biden. I think there are simply multiple themes that the Obama campaign wants to turn into sound bytes whenever they can. And if you can combine two all the better. Tax the rich is one. “We are patriotic” is another.

    We should be aware of the real tax goal of the far left. It is to get to the point where a minority of Americans pay any tax at all. Group A has more votes and can seize the money of group B at will. That’ll work well.

    • Creature of Chicago

      I don’t understand how paying taxes is patriotic when our nation was founded on a tax revolt.

      To the extent that a portion of the taxes we pay is allocated to the military, then I can see it. But I don’t think Biden had the military in mind when he made his remark.

      • Shiloh

        Big difference between paying the taxes you owe and being told that if you do not support a plan for higher taxes yet, you are unpatriotic.

      • http://www.nativeanericansagainstobama.wordress.com/ timepassages
    • tek

      I completely disagree that the income of people who have worked hard and made many sacrifices to get the education to earn a good living should then subsidize people who think education is stupid and someone should hand them whatever they want or we should pay to subsidize people who have entered the country illegally. Democrats have shown in the past that they are totally irresponsible with public funds, just as the current occupant.

      If the government is going to take people’s money they need to first establish means of accountability and transparency. Also I believe it’s way different to take money from people who are scamming the public (like corporations and televangelists) to make millions that to take money away from people who really do 9-5 it everyday to become secure.

      Also, the government needs to sincerely look at all the programs and arms of the federal government that are swallowing our public funds with no benefit to the people at large, like the farm subsidies and similar programs. I’m sure there are tons of federal offices that could be dispensed with if the government would be serious about running an efficient economy.

      Then Bush and Cheney should go to jail for the great Ponzi Scheme that is Iraq and their personal fortunes of ill-gotten gain should be pumped into the federal treasury.

      • nobamaever09

        maybe changing subject, but all subjects lately are connected. Young people who naively are supporting Obama do not take their time, ant think about what they parents think about how illigicat they are. Their parents put every poosible penny to their future; scholls,and most of all;food,doctors,cloding etc, and they dont understand that. when they(young people) become parents, it will be even worse, they will have much less of above, WHY,??? because they are supporting someone, who will screw them up. Obama will never deliver his PROMISES from Primaries, because He is now even discusing them, it is history, those promises are gone. Obama promiase has”face lift ” 3 times, now, if He win, will be “face lift”#4. Obamas clan is loaded with corrupted -thiefs CEO, current, or ex, from all those corrupted Loans companies, how in the hell You thing He will help You, when You are only here to give Your vote, and get nothing good in return.
        Well, Youngsters, You will cry someday for Your blindnes , naivnes and lack of any common sense…

      • Lee Ruth

        If you saw the intelligence I have seen. You would be making a different complaint. You would wonder why we waited so long.
        The mistake the President made was allowing DOS instead of DOD to run the aftermath. Jay Garner would have been better that Jerry Bremer had he been allowed to stay. People were too impatient.

    • tzada

      Yes, that would work if they remove the Constitution.

      Many people forget that America was founded as a Republic. America is a Democratic country, but founded on a Republic. This was done to insure that the majority does not take away the rights of a single person. Our Pledge to the flag says “and to the Republic, for which it stands…..

      One reason that the Democrats currently in Congress want to get rid of the Electoral College. It would allow states such as California to dominate the election process.

      The study of history will show you the correct path to the future.

      • tek

        Better do a deeper study of history yourself. The Pledge of Allegiance was written in the 1950s during the McCarthy era. We hadn’t been a bona fide republic for 120 years–Jackson ushered in Universal Manhood Sufferage.

        • richasis

          SORRY, BUT I HAVE TO JUMP ALL OVER THIS ASSERTION.

          ‘The Pledge’ was written in the Nineteenth Century:

          “I Pledge Allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

          The CHANGES to ‘the Pledge’ were introduced during McCarthyism…

          And Yes – We ARE a Republic, albeit a Democratic nne…

          • JozefAL

            Even more interesting, the Pledge was written by a Socialist* who intended its recitation to be accompanied by a special salute (think of the Nazi salute–the Pledge salute predated it by more than 30 years).

            *The author of the Pledge was a very religious Socialist–his view of Socialism was more in line with the form that would rise to power in the Scandinavian countries rather than the more ardent form that rose in Russia (IOW, a non-Marxist Socialism).

  • Perry Logan

    I think you read way too much into Biden’s statement.

    After all, Republicans have used patiotism as a political weapon ever since forever. They think nothing of badmouthing fellow Americans who have the temerity to disagree with their disastrous policies.

    Now the Democrats are using the same weapon— pay up or you’re not a patriot. I think there’s a lot of truth in the idea. And it’s fun to see the Republicans’ weapons used against them.

    • Shiloh

      This shows how little you know about patriotism. Those who undermine our troops in combat are decidedly unpatriotic. I think team Obama seeks to dilute the word by calling everything patriotic. The fact is voting for Obama is patriotic and if you don’t vote for him you are not only racist but unpatriotic too. Is that it?

      • Perry Logan

        As Samuel Johnson said, “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” Obama is most certainly a scoundrel.

        But Republicans have been scoundrels for years. They’re the ones who lied us into war. They’re the ones who didn’t proivde body armor. They’re the ones who let our troops lie around in otheir own urine. I think most Republicans are traitors posing as patriots.

        Obamagate
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qomPp_Y9Ps

        • rapp

          The US changed the war strategy because of the liberal media and the democrats. They were on the offensive using the “shock and awe” strategy. Democrats and the liberal media protested because of collateral damage where some people were being killed.

          The strategy went from being offensive to defensive. You don’t win wars on defense. Because of this change, hundreds of thousand people were killed.

          Nothing changed until the US went back on offense with the surge.

          The democrats used this to try and win the 2004 election. Killing people to get elected.

          This year the democrats are using the economy to win the election. The housing crisis is the cause and the democrats control both Fannie and Freddie. I’ve been telling people since 2005 that was how the democrats were going to win, and I am a union democrat. The party has become too liberal. They don’t care about the people, only the elite.

          • Ms. Misdemeanor

            Amusing comment.

            I learn something every day.

            Crawl back into your bubble now.

          • Newly Independent

            This year the democrats are using the economy to win the election.

            Had Hillary become the nominee, the Democrats would have definitely been on their way to taking back the White House in November.

            It’s not going to happen now.

            Not even the bad economy will save them.

            Many voters are still hung up on the Democrat “brand” being associated with good economies. Which is why the MSM is manipulating the economic crisis to try to help Obama. That “brand,” however, only works now with the Clintons in power. Those same voters know that Obama lacks the experience, skills and the will to fix the broken economy. Add to the picture Sarah Palin, who is the only person in the race this year with actual experience running a government & balancing budgets.

            These factors (and more) will spell a disastrous loss for the Democrats on Election Day.

            • wac for hillary

              I keep waiting for McCain to remind voters that the Democrats have had the majority in Congress since 2006 and have done less than nothing to solve the economic problems of the country.

              • http://! Clinton Fan

                McCain isn’t STUPID, that’s why he won’t do that.

                A razor thin majority that does nothing more but allow a party to set the agenda and choose the committee chairs is not a “working” majority.

                The only real majority is one that is veto-proof, or close enough to it that you can con members of the minority to vote with you on a reasonably regular basis.

                McCain would have his ass handed to him if he tried that tack, and McCain isn’t stupid, which is why you’re not going to hear him harping along those lines.

                • wac for hillary

                  Even with a razor thin majority, the Democrats could have introduced legislation. They couldn’t even do that. I firmly believe that McCain would not “have his ass handed to him” if he pointed this fact out. I hope he does not intend to use the “high road” politics of Gore and Kerry. Look where it got them!

            • nobamaever09

              YES, and it wont be pretty.
              Operah is the anemy to great America. For Opera;Obama,Party,Money , Her eagle are firstThey deserve each other.Great couple!!!

        • HARP

          Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.

          Sir Winston Churchill, Hansard, 1947

        • C.S.

          Democrats imitating the worst of Republicans is considered the “sincerest form of flattery”, also. So it doesn’t matter that Obama is a scoundrel admiring the Reagan ideology rather than the ideology of the best of Democrats?

          Republican scoundrels didn’t nominate Soertoro/Obama instead of Senator Clinton. And like it or not, the only choices we have are to vote for Soertoro/Obama, John McCain or vote for a 3rd party that will surely put one of the above in Our White House.

          I happened to believe that more than 20 years as a military officer does not make John McCain unpatriotic. And I happen to believe that not knowing whether Soertoro/Obama ever took Indonesian citizenship and traveled on an Indonesian passport does not a patriot make.

          No question Bush is not a patriot but then we aren’t voting for Mr. Bush this time either. This is not a coin toss here, we need to look at experience and accomplishments, not political party membership, because to be patriotic we have to vote for the candidate that best represents We the People and it isn’t International Symbol Soertoro/Obama.

          • Annie Oakley

            With you. And if government derives its legitimacy from the governed, then the head of that government owes his/her allegiance to the people of that nation. This idea of a “citizen of the world” for head of our government is distinctly unpatriotic.

        • Nicole

          What Rapp wrote is ridiculous!

          I’ve with you all the way, Perry.

        • richasis

          Perry, that is not wholly true…

          While some people who wear the ‘Republican’ title have done this, to insinuate that ALL ‘Republicans’ are culpable is just plain WRONG. Some ‘Democrats’ are culpable, too.

          Historically speaking, you should be impressed by the accomplishments of the Republican Party.

          I say this as a once lifelong Democrat – now Independent…

    • LandOLincoln

      Biden is just picking up a meme from Wes Clark’s 2004 tax plan.

      I don’t remember all the details, but at the bottom end Wes wanted families making less than $50,000/year to pay no income taxes at all, and he wanted to roll back the Bush tax cuts on the top 1%, asking them to do their “patriotic duty” and make sacrifices for the common good.

  • Sassy

    Money equals patriotism?
    Are we reverting to decades past when the affluent bought a “peon” to replace their own sons in the bloody wars?
    While we are regressing morally, will our enemies be much different than us in the long term?

    • tek

      Of course, the notion of income tax being patriotic is absurd seeing as how the Founding Fathers did not believe in income tax and it wasn’t legal until Woodrow Wilson’s administration. All a reaction to the Robber Barons who built their means of production with public funds, then never gave anything back to the public and did not have to pay income tax. But that was all the fault of the federal government for handing these people money and property without a contract that specified they would have to pay back what they got from the public. Now Bernanke is trying to pull a very similar scam.

      • http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com M. Simon

        Robber Barons gave nothing back?

        1. Railroads – cheap transportation
        2. The Electrical grid
        3. Telephone infrastructure
        4. Oil infrastructure
        5. Steel Production

        It seems to me we got a lot back.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          They did damned well for themselves, and took, like many CEOs still do nowadays, OBSCENE compensation for their efforts.

          Much of the electrical grid wasn’t built by robber barons, it was built by the US government and state and local municipalities. TVA, anyone? Hoover Dam?

          In fact, in the age before deregulation, the government had a hand, and a say, in a number of societally-critical public utilities and services, from MA BELL to the airlines. Were things “better” then? Hard to say….I can remember when the phone ALWAYS worked, your local bill was TINY, but you paid through the nose (to the point of GASPING) to call long distance anywhere–you didn’t call if you could write. Then again, you also didn’t have portable phones or phones you could take a picture with, either.
          I can remember paying more for plane tickets thirty or forty years ago to a destination than I would pay for the same travel to the same destination now. Of course, the planes back then were maintained in the US, and the work was checked and rechecked, while nowadays the planes are flown to Singapore or elsewhere for repair and if someone fucks up, the accountability is a bit less onerous.

          I don’t think we should be “grateful” to those characters running these societally vital industries for making outrageous profits. Even their altruistic efforts–the odd bullshit charities they set up to make themselves seem like nice guys– are a small, thin slice of their profit pie.

          There are trade-offs involved in the whole process of deregulation, people who run the industries make money, sometimes savings are passed on to consumers as a result of competition (and sometimes NOT), sometimes service isn’t quite as reliable, either; it’s just a pity that the profit-takers weren’t constrained at least slightly in the process. But unfortunately, regardless of whether the “business” is selling mortages or internet access or cable/satellite TV, where there’s a will to skim money off the top and profit-take like mad, there’s always a way.

  • Mel in TX

    We pay enough taxes on everything – gas, food eaten out, that cup of coffee in the morning and on and on.

    Just a side note – I am really tired or realclearpolitics distorting the polls to make Ohblowme’s numbers look better – every time Ohblowme is down they put some bullshit poll no one has ever heard of to make O’s average higher. Has anyone else noticed this trend ? It seems to me they are trying to suppress the vote for McCain just as they did with Hillary.

    God help us if this clown gets elected.

    • tek

      Yes, I worry about this too. I’m afraid the media is determined to publicize numbers that make Obama look viable so when he steals the election it won’t be that noticeable. Bush III?

    • Newly Independent

      I am really tired or realclearpolitics distorting the polls to make Ohblowme’s numbers look better – every time Ohblowme is down they put some bullshit poll no one has ever heard of to make O’s average higher.

      I’m sick of it too.

      The pollsters pulled the same crap during the primary. Had Hillary losing virtually EVERY state to Obama – hoping to discourage her voters from going to the polls. They got their faces crushed continuously though, as she went on to win the popular vote. Which is why the DNC resorted to cheating & stealing to get Obama the nomination.

      Ironically though, these poll manipulation tactics will help McCain. Because McCain supporters will not get comfortable with the polls & stay home on Election Day. They’ll turn out in droves for him – just like Hillary supporters did during the primary.

  • Cass

    I know this is off topic but I am worried by today’s Wash Post poll that has O up 9 points. I know there is plenty of time for the momentum to shift but I am still concerned. Thoughts? (PS – I am not a troll. I do not want Obama to win, I just want to discuss what others think of the poll and if there is any recovery for McCain)

    • Mel in TX

      It is propaganda to suppress McCain Voters – they deliberately stilt the numbers to show this clown leading so people will stay home – they always had Hillary’s numbers way down in the primaries too.

    • Newly Independent

      I know this is off topic but I am worried by today’s Wash Post poll that has O up 9 points.

      Don’t be.

      I posted this above:

      The pollsters pulled the same crap during the primary. Had Hillary losing virtually EVERY state to Obama – hoping to discourage her voters from going to the polls. They got their faces crushed continuously though, as she went on to win the popular vote. Which is why the DNC resorted to cheating & stealing to get Obama the nomination.

      Ironically though, these poll manipulation tactics will help McCain. Because McCain supporters will not get comfortable with the polls & stay home on Election Day. They’ll turn out in droves for him – just like Hillary supporters did during the primary.</blockquote>

    • wac for hillary

      I worry more about voter fraud by the likes of ACORN and other Obama front groups. Also, if Obama is doing so well, why does he keep abandoning states? Is the 50 or 57-state strategy not working? I also believe that the only reason he opened an office in Arkansas is just to poke the Clintons in the eye one more time. I’m not even sure God could or would want to help us if Obama gets his hands on the power of the Presidency.

      • http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com M. Simon

        If it isn’t close they can’t cheat (enough).

        • wac for hillary

          That’s why I’m hoping McCain slaughters Obama in the GE. Then maybe that would mean the end of Dean, Brazile, Pelosi, Reid, et al., too.

  • Judy L. NC

    I don’t attribute that much thought to Biden. I would agree with this for the most part, but your article is very stirring, Bud.

  • Will Smith

    STANLEY KURTZ: Barack Obama’s most important executive experience is radical. “Obama’s Challenge”

    http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTViMGRmMmYxZTgwZTFjYmFjODU5YzM4Y2MwM2ViMjY=

    • Will Smith

      Btw this is funny
      “If you’re lucky enough to be elected president”
      Lauer goes “tough” on Obama
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ufYoo5zWQc

      • Leisa

        That whole interview seemed scripted to me…

        Obama has been working hard on being aggressive in his answers and appearing tough. I predict we will see a more forceful Obama at the debates, he is rehearsing his lines, postures, tone, everything.

        He seems more Hitler-like by the day. That forcefulness is a major compensation tactic for something lacking… Like passionately caring about common Americans and issues that affect us. This transformation is about Obama winning, nothing more.

      • tek

        Notice Obama’s laughter when Lauer suggested he might not be elected. That smarmy look that says “You know it’s all arranged, stop making silly jokes.”

      • csuzeq

        I couldn’t even watch the whole thing!

        I wisht he dems could understand that they have no chance of winning the votes or bamboozling people who they can’t get to stomach listenting to the loser!

  • chandler

    I think that patriotic Americans should really rethink our devotion to and support of Liberal Hollywood. Celebrities are not role models that should be dictating to the public who to vote for. Now Hollywood is releasing a movie “W” just before the election. My family has decided to boycott the entertainment industry and I would love to see main street Americans do the same. How dare Larry King give Ahmadinejad airtime! What is CNN thinking. So he goes back to Iran unscathed and seemingly revered by the US media and he is seen as somekind of superhero to the Iranians. WTF ???? take these effers OFF THE AIR by boycotting the stations and sponsors.

    • bert

      chandler, I inderstand where you are coming from. But I must disagree nevertheless. In a free democratic society everyone has a right to be heard, even Ahmadinejad. Anything other than that is pure censorship and unconstitutional.

      • sowsear

        Too bad no one would give a voice to Hillary, and now almost none for McCain/Palin. All Obama, all of the time.

      • L

        He is not an American , therefore not entitled to
        our rights.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          Well, you really DO need to go back to school.

          We extend the right of free speech to non-citizens.

          People who want to restrict the blessings of liberty and, say, shut others up, even when their views are hateful, vicious, insane, or just plain fucking stupid, are the ones who are “un-American.”

          Something you might want to keep in mind….

      • chandler

        There is a difference between Ahmadinejad speaking at the UN and him being treated like a rock star by our media and celebrities. That is my point. I willnot support the Hollywood celebrities that are unpatriotic, and I hope others will as well. He is a sworn enemy of the United States, he is actviely planning the destruction of our nation and the stealth infiltration by jihad into our country So while agree that he should be allowed to speak freely at the UN is acceptable, being treated by Larry King with more deference than ever showed Hillary or Palin is JUST FLAT OUT WRONG.

    • standard

      It’s silly to “boycott the entertainment industry.”
      Actors have always been a bit daft, and always will be.
      It would be a dreary world without ‘em though!

      • http://chriss chris

        Yeah. They’re happy as long as they make their millions. See what their story is if their money goes away. The crying and whining would be heard round the world.

      • http://! Clinton Fan

        I agree.

        I judge actors on the quality of their work, on the stage or the screen. I don’t care, particularly, if they’re left wing, right wing, or somewhere in-between.

        I don’t think one’s enjoyment of drama should be tempered or constrained in any way by POLITICS or POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. In that case, you end up watching only SHITTY ACTORS who agree with you politically–that’s what used to happen in the USSR and what still happens in China and North Korea.

        If people were stuck watching ONLY left-wing actors, we’d have missed out on Bob Hope, Bing Crosby, Kelsey Grammar, Arnold the Terminator and others. If we were stuck watching ONLY right wing actors, we’d have to endure way too much of the non-talent of hack-schmucks like Ron Silver and that cretinous, smarmy Dennis “Jumped the Shark” Miller.

        I really don’t care about their personal lives, and anyone who does has bought into the PEOPLE Magazine/Entertainment Tonight/National Enquirer voyeurism that “the media” has convinced consumers is important.

        If you happen to see an actor spouting a view you don’t like, you have the power…pick up the remote control and change the channel. If you are reading about it, and it makes you unhappy, turn the PAGE–do something ELSE. How hard is it to say “I’m not wasting my time on THIS bullshit!!” It only takes a moment, after all.

        Crying and getting all huffy about the politics of entertainers, and suggesting boycotts because of that, is, well, ASININE. Immature. Rigid and pretty damned dumb, really. It’s as stupid as limiting the doctor or dentist you see, the lawyer you hire, the restaurant you dine at, based on POLITICS.

        I’d rather have a good doctor with politically opposite views from me than a malpractice-magnet hack who likes my choice for President, frankly.

        Of course, people are, as always, in America, free to do what they want, and they’re free to feel virtuous when they “miss out” on a good performance, a good meal, a good cavity filling, or a good medical diagnosis, as a result.

        • chandler

          Clinton Fan-you suggest avoiding those who you don’t agree with and yet you condemn boycotting. Aren’t they the same thing really? Don’t we impose sanctions on those countries that we wish to punish? Quite frankly anyone that advocates the Democrat nominee and process that accomplished this fraud would be someone whose judgement I would question. Stating that a personal choice of “deliberate avoidance” aka boycotting of entertainers, publications evokes such words as crying, huffy, ASININE , immature speaks volumes about you.

  • dixie

    Socialism at it’s best, until the money dries up, then who pays? Surely not the heads of the party. When the money dries up who pays for the welfare of the state? Not the heads of the state. When the money dries up, who will you vote for? Only one candidate will be allowed to.

  • trails

    I think this is an excellent post. I believe the “little guy,” or gal, has been under attack in the USA for a long time. Isn’t if funny how the MSM always points out that it’s the uneducated and low income Americans who are holding back the anointed one from assuming his “rightful” position. Talk about “entitled,” as one preacher screamed so loudly from Obama’s pulpit. Yuck.

    Look also how rural Americans are assumed to be capable of incest. Funny, I thought Woody Allen endorsed Obama.

    And this stuck up attitude applies to the press as well. Take Mr. Gibson (sorry, he’s not my Charlie, anymore), he was born in Evanston, an elite north-shore suburban suburb, educated at a prestigious, private, college prep school and is a graduate of Princeton, according to a Wickpedia SP? article.

    Lol, the piece also said he didn’t have the grades to get into a top flight law school, so he went into journalism instead.

    It all seems like class warfare to me. All the way from the politicians to their pandering media.

    • Elliott

      You are exactly correct. More and more voters feel the sting of elitism. In this context almost everything Obama and his supporters have done or said is class war. Some of the misogynistic language used was a cover for class snubs. Why do you think so many of these women Obama followers went along with the misogyny filth? They knew it was about class and not gender. This is why the outrage that Palin would not stay in her place to which they perceive she belongs is so loudly elite (or wannabes) women.

  • wodiej

    Biden is of no importance in my world. Every time he opens his mouth he says something stupid. Take it for what it’s worth.

    As for Republicans being as bad as Democrats, lets quit repeating this same mantra of horseshit in EVERY SINGLE THREAD OK?? We know both sides have their share of assholes. We need to look at McCain and Palin in the today, not the Republicans of yesterday.

    • Perry Logan

      Republicans as bad as Democrats? Republicans are a million times worse than Democrats!

      • Nicole

        Okay, now Perry you go too far. Both sides have their flaws, and while I agree the Neocon and fundamentalist, AK47-loving, universal-health-care deriding Republicans are much worse, they’re not a “million times worse” than Democrats.

        I agree with you most of the time, though.

        • http://! Clinton Fan

          I actually agree with Perry. And I don’t like Obama, either.

          They aren’t equal–how soon some forget the bullying and viciousness of the Frist Senate, the Hastert House…

          In fact, you can even go back to the Gingrich House and see that GOP nastiness, even back then, at work, that vicious delight in twisting the knife.

          The Democrats, though they have their share of sinners, just don’t have that cruel streak. They’re more upfront in prosecuting a political agenda on the Hill…and that’s just the truth.

      • wac for hillary

        Are you kidding? The current crop of Democrats running the Party have taken the lessons of the 2000 and 2004 Republicans and have “improved” on how to run a sleazy campaign. Any Democrats who think Obama is the answer to our country’s problems must have a mouthful of sand from their heads being buried during the campaign. I haven’t voted for a Republican on the national level for many years, but I sure will this time.

  • katmandu

    Biden received five student draft deferments during this period, with the first coming in late 1963 and the last in early 1968, at the peak of the Vietnam War.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biden

    How’s that for patriotism.

    I guess by Biden’s definition, Charlie Rangel is not patriotic, and Nancy Pelosi and the House Dems are not patriotic because they won’t sack Rangel? I know, I know, tax cheating is different, but it makes my point that this patriotism thing is nothing but the old Demo class warfare.

    • Perry Logan

      If the Bush administration wasn’t class warfare, there’s no such thing as class warfare.

    • HARP

      Ever wonder why the IRS calls it Form 1040? Because for every $50 that you earn, you get 10 and they get 40.

  • bert

    Great post, Bud. You laid out the essential difference between WFN and the rest of what used to be known as the Democratic Party. The clip and quote from Ken Burn’s, “The Civil War,” is a great real life meaning of true patriotism. This type of patriotism is something WFN types seem not to understand.

    The Democratic party is split, maybe forever. I think there will be a new Democratic Party formed after this election. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

  • churl

    A bit off-topic: race relations in the South. See HBO’s Trueblood for a fairly accurate portrayal of the way race works in the rural South. People like Bill Clinton grew-up with black neighbors, lived and worked with black friends. He was not isolated away in gated mansions where the only color was white (or latte) and certainly the only class was ritzy. It is more about class than race and you either want to screw the little guy (standard neocon GOP and O’Precious) or you want to help him (real Democrats and moderate Republicans).

    • Ms. Misdemeanor

      This is an excellent point.

      I’m a southern (Virginian).

      I grew up in integrated schools, played with blacks as a child. From the mid seventies onward, I have believed the the big cities on the Amtrack main line from Washington to Boston are much more racially polarized than the South, and I think you can extend this concept to the big cities in the Rust Belt.

      It would be nice if we could exhume W.J. Cash and stick his “Mind of the South” up his dead ass.

      Just my thoughts.

      I’m somewhat plain spoken.

    • Annie Oakley

      Bingo!

      It is more about class than race and you either want to screw the little guy (standard neocon GOP and O’Precious) or you want to help him (real Democrats and moderate Republicans).

      Race baiting is a great cover for the finishing details being accomplished by Goldman Sachs in Washington now.

  • Leisa

    Bud,

    You made a compelling case for the class warfare that is being waged by team Obama.

    We constantly hear about the “affluent, highly educated, creative class” that support Obama. This group is reported about in such a way as to imply that they are superior to any other American, except of course the black community (that would be racist).

    I am highly disturbed by this meme. We all know what happens when a group decides they are right and will prescribe solutions to help the poor deluded souls who can not possibly know what is right for them or are deemed worthless because of their circumstances.

    At any rate, I do feel that when the media pushes this meme that the “affluent, highly educated, creative class” are the ones supporting Obama, on many levels, what they are really talking about a group of people that are indeed financially successful and educated, but are also materialistic and consumer driven. To me, the “latte liberal and Whole Foods” tag is a clue that this is true. They are the group that follow trends, and they have been marketed to superbly. It is so easy to manipulate people when you tell them how superior they are.

    Again, great article!

    • Elliott

      Economic ranking is very important to this group but there are fairly large numbers of Obama supporters who are not well off. They make up what is known in some circles as the “university ghetto”. These are the highly educated or want to be highly educated who are waiters with masters in philosophy. Their self identity centers on their superiority. Then there is regionalism where people hate others simply because they are from somewhere else and that stems from elitism also.

    • tek

      Just like the Bush and the evangelical christians. Self-righteousness is a dangerous thing in politics.

    • jwrjr

      “Affluent” and “creative”, when used in the same sentence, is almost always an oxymoron. Truly creative people don’t care about money. As for the affluent, the only thing most care about creating is more money for them. H. D. Thoreau said that he was richer than J. Paul Getty because he (Thoreau) had all the money that he wanted while Getty didn’t.

    • Artemis

      It is so easy to manipulate people when you tell them how superior they are.

      Oh, how true!

  • HARP

    I’m proud to be paying taxes in the United States. The only thing is—I could be just as proud for half the money.

  • tek

    When Bill Clinton raised taxes on the millionaires, he also reformed the welfare system. This is the single thing that made the far left hate him. Obama wants to raise taxes on people who are far from being millionaires and then increase welfare in the form of The Neighborhood Project, etc. He intends to take money from successful Americans and just give it outright to blacks. This is not a positive agenda. These people need to get over themselves. Stop looking for Reparations for something that happened 300 years ago and start being responsible, productive people.

    • wodiej

      Agree….no doubt why he is garnering 90%+ of that vote.

    • wac for hillary

      The sad thing is I don’t think Obama intends to give needy blacks anything. If he cared about them at all, why didn’t he do something about the tenements in his state district? His buddy was Rezko; didn’t Obama have any influence on him, or was it strictly the other way around? I think all Obama has done is set race relations back for years to come, and I don’t think he cares, as long as he reaps the benefits.

  • dixie

    If Obama wins, all the Bidens, Pelosis, Kerrys, Kennedys, Deans, ——— , will be locked away in their closets and allowed to see the light of day only to make speeches in praise of his highness, Lord Obama. This past Sunday on sixty minutes, Obama lowered his tax cuts to folks earning $150,000. Down from his previous $250,000. By the time he gets through there probabely will not be too many in either bracket as the party takes control of America.

  • ford

    The polls that the Post is reporting are completely out of line…go to realclearpolitcs…MaCain is doing fine.

    The MSM rag tag is hard at work trying to convince you that your a stupid racist if you vote for McCain.

  • ConcernedCitizenX

    The “Whole Foods Nation” as you put it has been trying, since at least the Vietnam war, to push the notion that the willing sacrifice of one’s life and physical well-being for the nation’s security is not the supremely patriotic act. They want to reside in a morally relativistic framework that denies that some acts speak more of patriotism than others for the simple fact that they cannot bring themselves to express gratitude to the men and women who give their lives to this country in the military. It is a great shame that the Democratic Party wishes to brush under the rug. Rather than simply live their lives and show honest, complete gratitude to this nation’s military, they want to invent a false equivalence with the so-called “sacrifice” of paying taxes. This is absolute garbage and offends honest, common decency. The patriotic thing to do if you are not in the military and have not made that choice is not to fakely invent some kind of moral equivalence for other kinds of “sacrifices”. That is just obscene and a complete denigration of human life. The patriotic thing to do is, in every way, to love this country and honor those who have, in fact, given the supreme sacrifice. Biden’s remark is not merely an offense against a class of Americans who cannot afford his “patriotic” taxes. It is an offense against common decency. He is a shame to the Democratic Party.

    • sowsear

      The irony of this is that the rich do everything in their power not to pay taxes. Most of us do not have a staff of accountants looking for loopholes in the code, nor do we set up off-shore dummy addresses or accounts, put our huge assets into trusts, etc.

  • ford

    Concerned citizenX you are correct.

    Next it will be patriotic to hand over all you guns, and bibles…then it will be patriotic to report your neighbors, then it will be patriotic to have abortions if your child has a birth defect.

    It is a VERY slippery slope, and once you have life experiences, you can understand the trouble with BO.

  • John Smith

    I got this post form SavagePolitics.com

    One IMPORTANT note on the BIASED WaPo/ABC poll.

    Just check out the fine print of the poll at look at the blatantly skewed weighting: 38% Dem, only 28% Rep and 29% Indy (what the HELL is that about?). BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, the ADDED 170 African American voters to the poll and added their poll results in on an UNDEFINED WEIGHTED basis. This poll is so blatantly skewed that I actually sent a note to RealClearPolitics asking that they consider removing it from their national average as it is obviously, completely, irrelevant.

    Take care,

    Patrick

    • tek

      Giving the AAs greater weight. Hmmm, isn’t that what the DNC did in the primaries?

      What a crock!

    • ConcernedCitizenX

      This kind of statistical maneuvering is absolutely apalling and shows how far the media have gone. We need to have an uprising in this country against the media. They have gone too far.

    • HC

      The Washington Post has gone from “pretty darn silly paper” to “absolute rag, get it out of my house”.

  • tillthen

    Letter sent to the NY Times.

    NY Times = Goebbels’ Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Proganda

    Your continued distortions and lies about John McCain, Sarah Palin and their staff, and selective reporting or lack of reporting of newsworthy items concerning Obama is no different than what Goebbels did for Hitler.

    You are no different, in principle, than the Nazi’s who brought about the destruction of Europe and the loss of millions of lives, and if this election works its way into a controversy unfavorable to Obama, he will send his minions into the streets to shed blood and that blood will be on your hands. I sense that you know that and that you don’t give a shit.

    Your egregious hubris is no doubt buoyed by your partners in the MSM, many just as guilty, for their effort in this insult to America.

    Is the mission statement of the NY Times to become The Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda for the United States of America? Heil Obama!

    Fuck you.

    America first.

    • http://JohnMcCain.com Chockablock “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease?” Opampers

      Excellent comment. The Ohitler MSM alliance is a danger to our very liberty. History could repeat itself.

  • kinthenorthwest

    I was talking to a friend the other day and we both were wondering where the American generation we once knew went to.
    There is not only less respect for our country but there is less respect for our fellow citizens in this nation.
    We have grown into a me generation and nation. What will they do for ME, or what can I get out of it for ME.
    I truly feel that Obama is also a me person. I do not feel that Obama is in this election to help America. I feel he is in it for what the election can do for Him, for His self edification.
    The Obamas talk about the McCains money, planes and homes. Well at least it is very evident how the McCains have given back many times over through their work in America and in the world.
    With Obama I have only seen over and over how he has taken over and over. His wifes salary increase along side of an earmark…Their expensive Chicago home with assistance of a known crook and the list goes on.

    I want someone who believes in America and will make America stronger not bring it down.

    McCain ’08

    • benny

      well said, kin.

  • fred

    Barack Obama tells running mate Joe Biden to keep quiet and defended his pick of Biden over Hillary Clinton.
    http://countusout.wordpress.com/

  • http://www.patriotroom.com Bill Dupray

    VA Poll: McCain Up 3, NBC Spins It For Obama

    Video.

    Listen in the video where Chuck Todd says the lead is “somewhat good” for McCain. Actually Chuck, 3 points is a win in November, jackass. Why don’t we hear that Obama’s losing by 3 points is “somewhat bad” for him?

    http://patriotroom.com/?p=2347

    • tillthen

      Bill, LOL, yeah, its uncanny they way the color a story. F’em.

    • lark

      This is an everyday happening there. Every day the same thing. Todd will spin whatever polls towards Obama.

  • Calypso

    Senator Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio said on NPR yesterday that McCain/Palin were responsible for the economic meltdown. Also that Bush/Cheney are somewhat responsible but it is mostly McCain’s fault. He emphatically repeated this mantra several times.

    Is this what is coming from democratic leadership and the Obama campaign….blame Senator McCain for this meltdown??

    To hear a Senator Brown use a catastrophic failure in the economy for political purposes made my blood boil!!

    Clearly, someone like Prof. Paul Krugman should be appointed to head a commission of HIS choice to handle solving this problem. Neither party are free of involvement with the entities involved in bringing this crisis on and BOTH parties will use the crisis to promote their political agenda and leave us citizens out in the cold.

    Totally disgusted with the democratic leadership I have supported for 50 years..

    • wac for hillary

      McCain should immediately run an ad showing he tried to do something about the problem, but got no help from the self-righteous, pig-swilling Democrats.

  • HARP

    Today the New York Times launched its latest attack on this campaign in its capacity as an Obama advocacy organization. Let us be clear about what this story alleges: The New York Times charges that McCain-Palin 2008 campaign manager Rick Davis was paid by Freddie Mac until last month, contrary to previous reporting, as well as statements by this campaign and by Mr. Davis himself.

    In fact, the allegation is demonstrably false. As has been previously reported, Mr. Davis separated from his consulting firm, Davis Manafort, in 2006. As has been previously reported, Mr. Davis has seen no income from Davis Manafort since 2006. Zero. Mr. Davis has received no salary or compensation since 2006. Mr. Davis has received no profit or partner distributions from that firm on any basis — weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual — since 2006. Again, zero. Neither has Mr. Davis received any equity in the firm based on profits derived since his financial separation from Davis Manafort in 2006.

    Further, and missing from the Times’ reporting, Mr. Davis has never — never — been a lobbyist for either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. Mr. Davis has not served as a registered lobbyist since 2005.

    http://www.johnmccain.com/mccainreport/Read.aspx?guid=74063c9d-7cb5-47c9-acf6-53c0c2d88376

    • http://JohnMcCain.com Chockablock “Hillawee can you change my diapy pwease?” Opampers

      Thanks for posting this info on the New York Slimes.

    • lark

      This is also an everyday event. Every day the Times brings something damaging against McCain or Palin.

      • Jon

        If it isn’t true, why didn’t the McCain campaign deny it in their 650 word statement?

        Read it. There’s no denial there.

    • lark

      I think all they want is the continuation of the comedian in the WH. And with Biden they get two for the price of one. After 8 years of comedy, they don’t to go through withdrawal pains.

    • ConcernedCitizenX

      Welcome to the United Socialist States of America:

      New York “Pravda” Times
      Washington “Pravad” Post
      New “Pravda” Republic
      Atlantic “Pravda” Monthly
      McClatchy “Pravda” Newspapers
      MS”Pravda”NBC
      C”Pravda”N”Pravda”N

      America needs to wake up. Freedom of the Press does not mean Freedom to Lie. Lies are fraud, and fraud can be fought in court.

      We need a class action lawsuit against the media for creating an egregiously false notion of objectivity. Everyone knows the media are subjective, but they have crossed the line and are purporting to present information as “objective” that has been deliberately manipulated.

      Let’s bring them to their knees and show them what “We The People” really means.

    • wac for hillary

      It’s time that the laws protecting the media from slander and libel are changed. The media have abused these laws (intended to protect an honest, objective media from frivilous lawsuits) for too long. I’m really having trouble remembering what a fair and balanced media looks like.

  • tillthen

    Sorry, have to say it again,

    The mission statement of the NY Times is to become

    The Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda for the United States of America.

    Heil Obama!

  • Jon
    • wac for hillary

      I try not to; it’s such a waste of time.

    • vinnie

      she’s a teenager with a crush on barry. It really is embarrassing watching her get all flustered and mad whenever someone dares to say anything negative about her crush. Lady Lynn schooled her and all she could do was give a snide laugh at the end of the interview and shaking her head.

  • Boxer Mum 06

    Ok, I’m a bitter person who clings to my religion and guns (I’m from PA afterall, so I’m lumped in this category).

    I’m a novice to the whole economic meltdown and the details of the bail out plan. With that being said, why would the government recommend one person (Paulson) be given the golden ticket to decide arbitrarily what he spends it on? If we don’t currently have a fraud issue, aren’t we asking for one with this plan?

    Why wouldn’t they recommend a group of nonpartisan members handle this decision making – similiar to a board of directors? Why wouldn’t they enlist Warren Buffet to help with this mess? This man as far as I know is independent and lets face it, he has enough money so I doubt he could be bribed in his decision making.

    How did it come to this? We have such brilliant minds in finance in this country – enough with the bickering and fighting…just FIX IT!!!

  • arabella trefoil

    Wonderful article, Bud White. What you have to say is so important that I hope it gets wide play.

    I am unable to articulate my unease with the class warfare issues in the election. Thank goodness writers like you can break it down for us.

    Bravo!

  • wodiej

    great post Bud….

    basically it sounds like Obama’s supporters think they are better than others based on income or perceived superiority.

  • Peggy Sue

    Excellent post, Bud. But then, you’re essays are always thought provoking.

    As for the polls, I have noticed that when Obama is up a point or two, the shift is “encouraging.” When McCain takes the lead it’s “insignificant.”

    Amazing! Delivery is everything in this election cycle. We can only hope that the average voter isn’t as brain dead as David Axelrod and his crew apparently believe.

    Anyway, good read!

    • Jon

      And similarly here, every time McCain takes the lead it is a sign that Obama is gonna lose. Every time Obama takes the lead, the polls are liberal O-bots that are meaningless.

      Anyway, Obama wins College Graduates!

      FREE SARAH PALIN

      • sowsear

        Not all college graduates are for Obama, but then not all college graduates are in the Whole Foods Crowd. I am one of them, and I had never heard of WFoods before BO’s arugula statement,nor have I ever had a latte coffee. I am also comfortably well off.
        Obama is an arrogant elitist who is using AAs and has no real respect for them as they are mostly the same class as those whites he denigrates. He is a superficial snob.

        • wac for hillary

          Your last paragraph sums Obama up nicely!

      • Newly Independent

        And similarly here, every time McCain takes the lead it is a sign that Obama is gonna lose.

        Well, Obama is going to lose.

        We don’t need any poll to confirm that.

        But it is nice to see the truth coming from the pollsters – even if it is only on occasion that they tell the truth.

      • vinnie

        don’t you remember, it was like that with Hillary as well. With her win in PA, they couldn’t even say she won by 10 points. The msm said she won by 9 point something or other. That remains, for me, to be one of the most ridiculous ass kissing to barry.

  • requiredreading

    Off-topic (apologies to the author) but I need to get your input on this. I have a relative who works in a big city Department of Housing and this person keeps getting emails (official Department email address)from colleagues about supporting Obama, working the phone banks for Obama, and buying Obama T-shirts (from Move-On). Isn’t it illegal to use city government email, employees, and time to campaign for one particular candidate?

    • StrawberrybitesBarky

      Forward the e-mails to Susan and Larry with a little note. They may find it interesting enough to write about.

  • http://www.theindependentview.com Matthew Weaver

    Maybe I sit on the fringe of typical Democrat, even not a good fit for typical Republican, but I fundamentally disagree with most tax and patriotism positions.

    - Progressive taxation is undemocratic. It punishes success and creates a free-loading class of citizens. Everyone should pay an equal share. Double taxation on different activities will result in more affluent citizens paying more. I am a fan of flat tax or even replacing it all with a VAT.

    - Patriotism is being an honest, law abiding citizen who contributes to the commonweal. Serving in the military or doing other public service is important. Make no mistake, military service is the ultimate sign of patriotism or, as in the case of those who scheme to avoid service, the sure sign of a lack of patriotism. I dispise chickhawks like Cheney, Limbaugh, Biden, Hannity, and others that talk up patriotism yet when they faced the challenge to serve, they found excuses to avoid service. In this regard, I’m not sure how to classify Obama as he now says he thought about military service, as if that makes him a patriot.

    • http://! Clinton Fan

      Depends on what you mean by “progressive,” though, doesn’t it?

      It also depends on what you mean by “share” too.

      Are you talking about a flat fee per person, or a static percentage of income?

      A flat fee is plainly a REGRESSIVE tax, fucking the low wage earners worst of all. Sales taxes on basic goods, VATS, they’re regressive, and they suck.

      If everyone pays the same PERCENTAGE of income tax, though, that really isn’t progressive–but the rich person WILL end up paying more tax, because they’ve earned more.

      I don’t know who these freeloaders you speak of are, though. I don’t know any of them.

      I do know people who work their asses off in the most menial of jobs, caring for the sick and elderly, cleaning up shit and doing the most important but rather unsavory jobs with gentleness, compassion and caring, who make a lousy, stinking twenty grand a year. I know one fellow who works a second job delivering pizza after his day job to make ends meet and keep his kids in Walmart sneakers.

      They aren’t FREELOADERS, they’re what’s called “working poor.” The one to two grand of their shitty salary they pay every year in tax is what some of my wealthy pals spend eating in restaurants every few months. My wealthy pals CAN afford to pay more. It’s not necessary to gouge them, but a percentage point more isn’t going to kill them. Trying to suggest coughing up a little more is “virtuous” or calling paying a tiny bit more “patriotic” though, is idiotic. If you’re living large, and the bite isn’t big, it’s not a big deal.

      All that said, what is success?

      Is success being authentic in your life, doing meaningful work that makes a difference to your fellow humans, or is success eating at fancy restaurants and having a bigass bank account?

      Or is it a little of both? And maybe something moore?

      Or something else entirely?

      I think a lot of this crap that is being thrown around about who’s rich and who isn’t, and how people behave, and arugula, and Whole Foods, and latte… is just that–a load of crap.

      I take issue with Obama because he is inexperienced, he is a stumblebum who is lost without a teleprompter and can’t think on his feet, his advisors AND his friends are a bunch of (sometimes shady) cretins (many of whom ARE experienced, and I don’t like their “brand” of experience), he is a crook (and once a crook, always a crook), and he is a one-note, whining, hubris-laden, aloof, arrogant…well…asshole.

      THAT’s why I don’t like Obama. I find him sketchy on a number of levels.

      I am not in love with McCain, or Palin, either, but I think McCain, constrained by a Democratic Congress, will be tolerable for four years, and maybe, in his old age, he’ll be bigger than PARTY and bigger than personal ambition–I do think he has that quality in him. I also think he’s not stupid, and is better equipped to handle national security issues. I also think the tension between a Democratic Congress and a GOP (sane, for a change) President will force bipartisanship.

      The truth of the matter, though, is this: I see McCain as a placeholder for CLINTON 2012.
      That’s MY bottom line.

  • Ms. Misdemeanor

    Great Write as always, Bud!

    • http://medusa2.wordpress.com Medusa

      Thanks Bud. Great post.

      I have no doubt that Bozo wouldn’t know real patriotism if it bit him in the butt. We’d expect Biden to, but not all his cylinders are firing.

      • sowsear

        I think you’re right about Biden, ditto BO; it’s the puppeteers, we have to fear.

  • Talk2ThePaw

    Does Biden ever learn. Watching him live on Fox and he just said, ” In the mountains between Pakistan and Afganistan where my helicopter was forced down”. rofl

  • DancingOpossum

    Democrats have shown in the past that they are totally irresponsible with public funds,

    I know. That Clinton presidency! Tell me, which did you hate more: The peace or the prosperity? The balanced budget or the lack of war-related casualties? Just curious.

    Also: What Clinton Fan said. Totally agree, great post.

  • Tristan

    The idea that as your income goes up, not only do you pay more taxes, but an ever increasing percentage, even though you get no additional services in return, is an unfair one. Its impossible to justify on any grounds other than that it hurts wealthy people a little less when we take their money because they still have more left over. So Biden has to come up with some half-assed defense like “its patriotic”.

    And by the way, our tax code is as much to blame as anything else for the economic mess. The high marginal rate on income and the low rate on long-term capital gains and zero rate on housing turns the entire country into speculators in an attempt to earn low-tax or tax-free money.