RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Plamegate Chroniclers Corn and Waas

Murray Waas, a noted writer on Plamegate and the Libby trial for the National Journal — you saw him on the CIA Leak panel at last summer’s YearlyKos Convention that featured Joe Wilson, Larry Johnson and moderator Jane Hamsher (video at Fora.TV) — will prepare and write The United States v. I. Lewis Libby, which “will include testimony and original reporting.” The paperback, to be published by Sterling Publishing’s Union Square Press, will be co-prepared by Waas’s friend, Jeff Lomonaco, a professor of political science at the University of Minnesota. Waas’s editor, Philip Turner, also edited books by Joe Wilson and Tyler Drumheller, says Waas at his blog, Whatever Already! (More details: CBS News and Wonkette.)

At the end, I tossed in snippets from Maureen Dowd’s latest column on her friendship with Juror No. 9. But first, there’s David Corn, who with Michael Isikoff already has a book out on Plamegate, and who has a new in-depth article at The Nation magazine: “Cheney On Trial” (how we wish):

It was fall 2003. The news had broken that the Justice Department, at the request of the CIA, was investigating the leak that outed Valerie Wilson as an undercover intelligence officer, and FBI investigators were targeting White House officials. With a firestorm under way, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, went to see his boss. Libby hadn’t passed any information about Valerie Wilson to right-wing columnist Robert Novak, who first published the leak in a July 14, 2003, column. But he had talked to other reporters about Valerie Wilson and her CIA connection before the leak occurred. And he also knew that Karl Rove, White House über-strategist, had spoken to Novak about her days before the leak column. That is, Libby knew a fair bit about the episode.

Libby told Cheney he had not been one of Novak’s two Administration sources for the leak, and he offered to disclose to the Vice President everything he knew. But Cheney did not want to hear it; Libby said no more.

Shortly after that, Libby, responding to a request from investigators, came across a note in his files indicating that in early June 2003–weeks before the Wilson affair began–Cheney had told him that the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson worked at the CIA’s Counterproliferation Division, a unit of the agency’s clandestine operations directorate. (At that point, the former envoy had spoken only privately to two reporters about his CIA-sponsored trip to Niger, during which he had concluded there was not much to the intelligence report that Iraq had been uranium-shopping there.) The note was a significant discovery. A key issue in the investigation was who in the Bush Administration had spread information about Wilson’s wife to undermine Wilson’s charge that the White House had twisted the prewar intelligence (a criticism Wilson made public in a July 6, 2003, New York Times op-ed). And Libby had uncovered evidence showing that Cheney had conducted his own research on Joseph Wilson early on, learned about Valerie Wilson’s CIA job and shared the information with Libby. Cheney apparently was the first White House official to discuss Valerie Wilson’s specific place of work. …

Keep reading “Cheney On Trial.”

::::::::::::

P.S. Maureen Dowd has her “very own juror”. A snippet for those of you who don’t pay to read MoDo:

[...]

I went to Nativity grade school in D.C. with Juror No. 9, Denis Collins. I had an unrequited crush on his brother when I was in seventh grade. His dad was my dad’s lawyer, and both were Irish immigrants. My brother Kevin coached his brother Kevin in touch football. Our moms were in the Sodality together. His mom once chastised me for chatting up a little boy in church. We started in journalism together, Denis at The Washington Post as a sportswriter and Metro reporter, and me at The Washington Star as a sportswriter and Metro reporter.

This was a sure thing. I could get him to come over to my house and spill all the secrets of the jury that had convicted the highest-ranking White House official to be found guilty on a felony since Iran-contra days.

Unfortunately, Denis spilled them on the way over. By the time he got to my house, he was already so overexposed he announced, “I’m sick of hearing myself talk.”

From the moment he stepped out of the courthouse and into the press mob in his green Eddie Bauer jacket, Denis became the unofficial jury spokesman, bouncing from Larry King to Anderson Cooper and “Good Morning America.” I thought there still might be enough jury dish for me until I heard him say “Huffington Post blog.”

“Blogs are the future, right?” he said, explaining that he’d already posted his diary of adventures in federal court — right down to our incestuous Catholic past, which came up in the voir dire, when he also mentioned living across the alley from Tim Russert and working at The Post for Bob Woodward, and his nonfiction book about spying and the C.I.A.

“I was the perfect storm,” he said. Instead of me milking him for information, he tried to milk me for information. He asked about the pitfalls of being in a media maelstrom.

“Somebody called me up today and said: ‘Turn on Rush Limbaugh. He’s saying terrible things about you.’ ”

I empathized. One of my brothers always used to call Mom and tell her: “Turn on Rush Limbaugh. He’s saying terrible things about Maureen.”

Also, Denis’s wife, Pam, told him gleefully that someone on TV was making fun of his jacket. “Somebody said, ‘What’s with the green coat? It looks like something he got in high school.’ ” I asked him if he’d used any lessons from the nuns. “Accountability,” he said. “Do the right thing or get whacked over your head with the bell by Sister Mary Karen.”

Was Scooter’s fall Shakespearean? “He’s too many steps away from the king,” he said. “One of the jurors said, ‘He was too busy looking out for No. 1; he should have been looking out for No. 2 and then he wouldn’t have gotten in trouble.’ One of the witnesses told us that Libby spent more time with Cheney than he did with his own wife and kids.”

What did the jurors think of Scooter’s wife? “Well, the alleged wife,” Denis corrected me. This was a very skeptical jury, then?

“We didn’t know anything about her,” he said, adding: “I said, ‘So, that’s Scooter Libby’s wife?’ and another juror jokingly said, ‘Do you have any evidence?’ ” So the jurors began calling her “the alleged wife.” …

  • Mr.Murder

    Alleged wives, alleged family values.

    It turns out the jury had a distinct beltway background to it.

    Almost like a case of spooks’ revenge. Tried by a jury of peers, literally.

  • Graybeard

    “It turns out the jury had a distinct beltway background to it.
    Almost like a case of spooks’ revenge. Tried by a jury of peers, literally.”

    I would liken Washington to a pirate ship. Per the History Channel, the captain served at the pleasure of the crew, and was tried by his peers if unpopular.

    Remember, all the wealth in Washington has been taken from the consumer/taxpayer.

  • Mr.Murder

    “While You Were at War: Richard A. Clarke

    In every administration, there are usually only about a dozen barons who can really initiate and manage meaningful changes in U.S. national security policy. For most of 2006, some of the critical chairs have been vacant, such as the deputy secretary of state (Robert Zoellick is off with the investment bank Goldman Sachs) and the deputy director of national intelligence has been vacant since General Mike Hayden left to become CIA director. With the nation involved in a messy war spiraling toward a bad conclusion, the key cabinet members and other potential change agents are all focusing on only one issue, and it is always the same issue: Iraq.

    National Security Council veteran Rand Beers has called this the “herd ball, seven year old’s soccer syndrome” — everyone forgets their particular positions and responsibilities and just trying to get close to the ball. In the end, there are only twelve seats at the conference table in the Situation Room and the barons’ schedules mean that they can seldom meet there together in person or on secure video conference more than about ten hours each week. When things are not first tier, they slip for months, as the first cabinet level meeting on terrorism did, until September 4, 2001.

    Without the distraction of the Iraq war, the administration would have spent this past year — indeed, every year since September 11, 2001 — focused on al Qaeda. But beyond that obvious agenda and the broader struggle for peaceful coexistence with (and within) Islam, a number of “fires in the in-box” issues remain unattended, deteriorating and threatening while Washington’s grown up seven-year-olds plays herd ball with Iraq:

    — Global Warming: When the possibility of invading Iraq surfaced in 2001, to the extent senior Bush administration officials thought about global warming it was to wonder whether it was caused by human activity or by sunspots. Today, for the world’s scientists and national leaders, that is no longer a question. Instead, they are deeply concerned…

    `–Russian revanchism: When President Bush and and Russian president Validimir Putin leave office in rapid succession in 2008 and 2009, it seems likely Russia will be less of a democracy and less inclined to cooperate with Washington than it was six years ago, when Bush stared in the eyes (and looked into the heart) of the Russian leader. In her earlier
    role as national security advisor and now as secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice would have been a natural to work on key U.S.-Russian issues, given her extensive background in Soviet affairs. But the focus on Iraq has precluded that, even as the troubling issues multiply: Russian Governors are no longer elected, dissidents die mysteriously and probably at the hands of the new KGB, opposition media is suppressed, corporate leaders are jailed or hounded out of the country. Moscow plays petro-politics by dramatically raising the cost of energy to former Soviet republics that do not tow Moscow’s line and threaten to turn
    off the pipeline to European nations that are uncooperative. If the implicit Bush strategy was to turn a blind eye to all of this to get Russian cooperation in Iraq and Iran, it has not worked.

    – Latin America’s leftist lurch: In the years before the Iraq War, American presidents were welcomed at frequent summits throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. On September 11th, Secretary of State Colin Powell was on a tour of one area of the world where U.S. policies had worked. Friendly and democratic governments were in power in every nation in the hemisphere except Cuba. Formerly debt-ridden economies were widely implementing pro-market reforms, and the United States was broadly welcomed as a partner. Washington seemed confident that if and when Fidel ever died (there was always some doubt), even Cuba would join the democracy/free market club. Today, Fidel has been replaced, but not just by another Cuban dictator. The leader of the new anti-Yankee alliance sweeping the hemisphere is the democratically elected leader of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez. Chavez’s anti-U.S. campaign is supported by Cuban intelligence and Venezuelan oil money. By 2006, Venezuela and Cuba were not alone in their vehement opposition to Washington; kindred spirits have been elected in Nicaragua, Ecuador, and Bolivia. Having started the administration pledging new cooperation with Mexico, Bush backtracked after 9-11, focusing instead on closing doors to the south, tightening immigration and border controls.

    – Africa at war: The genocide spilling from the Darfur region of Sudan into neighboring Chad has captured growing attention in the United States due to belated media coverage and an aggressive advertising campaign by concerned groups, but the prospects of Washington dealing with the problem effectively seem slim. Darfur, however, is only one of a pox of conflicts that, together with HIV/AIDS, are depopulating parts of Africa and robbing it of the potential of mineral, oil and gas deposits. Wars have raged in Congo, Chad, Liberia, Somalia, and Sierre Leone. Were it not for Iraq, Washington might have acted to stop what the Bush administration admits is a genocide in Darfur, or taken steps to prevent the takeover of Somalia by an al Qaeda affiliated group. Unfortunately, even supporting a small presence of U.S. Special Forces to lead a U.N. approved coalition peacekeeping force is beyond the capability of the badly stretched U.S. military.

    – Arms control freeze: Once at the top of several administrations’ national security agendas, international arms control has received little attention since in the first months of the Administration the decision was made to walk away from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. Just as his predecessor’s expertise was on the Soviet Union, current National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley’s past government experience was in arms control and he began to focus on his familiar turf as the number two at NSC early in 2001. Post 9-11, he has had little time to achieve advances in international regimes controlling biological weapons, weapons in space, nuclear testing and proliferation, or the threat of nuclear or radioactive terrorist weapons. For a long time dealing with the nuclear weapons program of Iran was out-sourced to the Europeans, just as the onus of stopping the North Korean nuclear development was placed on Asian nations. The Administration claimed it could not do the talking because it reserved U.S. diplomatic dialogues for nations without “bad behavior,” but to stop two nuclear programs the administration would have need significant senior level bandwidth that was simply not available.

    – International crime: In a nationally televised address in 1989 the first President Bush held aloft a bag of cocaine that had been sold near the White House and declared a “War on Drugs.” That effort was later enlarged to deal with the international criminal cartels engaged in trafficking in persons, gun and contraband smuggling, money laundering and
    counterfeiting, official corruption, and cyber fraud. I had a hand in drafting the first national strategies to combat international crime and cyber security threats. The momentum from those efforts produced international structures and treaties to combat hidden global crime conglomerates, but the White House level leadership needed to coordinate…
    Moreover, the international crime cartels received a major shot in the arm, literally, with the occupation of Afghanistan by NATO forces.

    – Pakistan and Afghanistan: Afghanistan does increasingly receive the attention of the senior U.S. policymakers, not because of the narcotics problem, but mainly because the once defeated Taliban again threaten Afghan and coalition forces. No amount of attention to Afghanistan will, however, provide the answer to that nation’s problems. If there is a solution, it is on the other side of the Khyber Pass where a sanctuary has emerged, a
    Taliban-like state within a state in western Pakistan. Dealing with that problem is more than Washington has been willing or able to handle, for it involves the complex issue of who governs nuclear armed Pakistan and how. Thus far, Washington has accepted General Musharaff’s half way measures on dealing with the nuclear proliferation network of A.Q. Khan, addressing the terrorist involvement of Pakistani intelligence, and controlling the
    Taliban/al Qaeda bases in Wuziristan. Getting Pakistan to do more would require a major and sustained effort by senior US officials, including addressing the long standing tensions with India. Because of Iraq, Washington’s national security barons do not have the hours in their days to manage that, nor the troops need to secure Afghanistan.

    As the President contemplates sending even more U.S. forces into the Iraqi sink hole, he should think that staying on there is not just about the thousands of fatalities, the tens of thousands of casualties, the hundreds of billions of dollars of unproductive debt generation, it is also the opportunity cost of taking his national security barons off all of the other jobs they should be doing to address critical problems whose window of opportunity for solution are slamming shut unheard over the wail of Baghdad sirens.”

    http://www.goodharborreport.com/node/875?destination=node%2F875

  • Graybeard

    “Having started the administration pledging new cooperation with Mexico, Bush backtracked after 9-11, focusing instead on closing doors to the south, tightening immigration and border controls.”

    Uhh, what border controls? Illegal imports of humans, drugs and potential terrorists are flourishing. It’s reportedly a $40 Billion a year business. They have jailed USBP agents for doing their job, and given immunity to drug traffickers only to intimidate the Border Patrol.

    Up to that point, I’ve had great respect for and belief of Richard Clarke.

  • http://profile.typekey.com/mpumpky/ PrchrLady

    Mr. Murder, and Greybeard… you both broke it down into two clear and succinct sentences. Well done!! I also want to thank MM for the link to the above story. On way out the door, but am PRINTing it to read. I thank you for sharing it…

  • http://noquarter.typepad.com SusanUnPC

    FYI, Charlie Rose’s PBS show tonight is on Cheney (yeah, more Beltway speculations, but what the hell …)

    A DISCUSSION ABOUT VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY WITH MICHAEL DUFFY
    Assistant Managing Editor, Time
    THOMAS DEFRANK
    Washington Bureau Chief, New York Daily News”
    TODD PURDUM
    Vanity Fair”

    (I always get a kick out of DeFrank even if he has apparent close ties to the White House … he reminds me of the old-style journalists like Jerry Nachman. But Todd Purdum may have the most revealing comments tonight.)

  • http://www.netkl.net/warseo/ Payday loan
blog comments powered by Disqus