So she’s been fooling her bosses. All this time they thought she was a covert agent, when actually she was just getting the coffee and sharpening the pencils. All that overseas work was just a clever ploy to throw them off-track. In fact, she fooled the head of the CIA himself into believing she’s covert.

Dig into your meth money and buy yourself a clue, honey.

The Hastert/Turkey scandal, the GH Venture/Chevron(Condi) pipeline in Afghanistan and Powell’s “carpet of gold or bombs.”

Chechen and Balkan cells for Al Qaeida, the DeLay lobby crew flights to east Europ. The Atta/Prague rumors leading to…

…Hill & Knowlton’s media work in helping prop up the INC/London and ILF/Paris. Bolton bullying his way through there, leading to the death of an American diplomatic “by Suicide” who jumped off a roof after a roughing up office visit by John Bolton in Africa. Plame network contact?

H&K and Rendon Group working massive PR campaigns and false verifies for stories starting from the WHIG/OSP.

The FBI could be slapped down by Plame still as well. Their evidence collection was substandard by their own procedures, they deliberately fumbled the work with the other ladies’ cases for political expediency.

There were other names who look to have been network assets, persons working in energy/military sectors abroad, many with military backgrounds, who came to early and often violent deaths.

As for Novak’s mouth, he’s lucky no stroke has occurred. That he even lived to tell about it was because by the time he heard the word was already out through traditional and/or back channels.

He basically just gave voice to something that Cheney pushed past the point of disclosure. Had such not been the case, and Novak’s word would be the bellweather, that piece of shit would not have breathed a word of it out. Does he realize or even care, is another story. He knows BS-ers get paid to BS and he did it. He was not the messenger he was the medium, that’s why he isn’t going to be tried at this time.

In a way his doing so did an indirect favor. Slower IC watchers on caught on quick, but the keenly attentive were well ahead of this. Novak was the fallout, the nukular damage had already occurred.

As for the star and Plame’s mention, there’s still good chance it happened in another way on the actual document. The archives would determine that, in review of evidence submitted.

What???? Was she the cold war “Spy Who Came in from the Cold” or just a hot babe sitting at her desk, powdering her ……? All expenses paid.

“I have been advised by the CIA, that even now after all that has happened, I cannot disclose the full nature, scope and character of Ms. Wilson’s service to our nation without causing serious damage to our national security interests. But General Hayden and the CIA have cleared these following comments for these hearings. During her employment at the CIA, Ms. Wilson was undercover. Her employment status at the CIA was classified information, prohibited from disclosure under Executive Order 12958. At the time of the publication of Robert Novak’s column on July 14, 2003, Ms. Wilson’s CIA employment status was covert. This was classified information.”

Jeez, I guess there was an underlying crime, since she was covert.

Please ignore the last two years of Republican talking points. They are no longer operative.

Libby found guilty should enable Fitz to take it forward if he wants and treat the Committee as an trial with regards to establishing Impeachment by the rule you show? Or is that what DoJ claims he must restrain?

Fitz is equal to the AG so an AAG(abstained status withstanding) should not check his desire to present evidence. Sentencing would of course really open the vault of info, but it’s quite clear we must get Committees ahead of the Iraq and Iran issues before us.

It appears Fitz can now pursue discovery or inspire it.

The GJ evidence and archives are damning enough. What you’ll find is Fitz had amazing tact with what he chose to present the GJ on the volumes of material he had from the dirty diapers crew of Bushco. Material not for GJ was even beyond that, and will be the whopper of findings. How can this be presented as it applies to other GJ level if it did not make his narrow GJ hearing? Items not fit his GJ may fit others, items not fit for his GJ may fit others. how much can this be determined?

Libby’s resignation should not apply toward keeping this investigation narrow as he did not resign until this was underway.

He was faking testimony of his superior and changed that in court, it would be nice to see this mention outside before new grand jury as possible stall tactic/coverup kind of smokescreen.

My assumption was Fitz would stay narrow and avoid Congress for specific reasons but he appears to be comfortable with appearing before fellow prosecutors/lawyers under the Rule listed in letter.

The body of evidence in the trial, presented to jury and witheld but fit for sentencing, could be enough to take it forward. Fitz could issue a letter and let them take the body of evidence forward. It’s one reason they blocked snail mail with such vigor.He fought to keep the kind of material distractions Reps. will insert out of the record. The facts bear urgency in their own right.

It appears this is indeed a proceeding. Fitz should let the discovery process of Plame’s appearance create the demand for his appearance outside his letter in support of evidentiary findings.

He’s independent, I don’t get what the AAG would have on his status at this time. It appeared to be a horse before cart argument by the DoJ for restraint. Then again I’m no lawyer and have not stayed at a Holdiay Inn since Clinton was in town, so I’m not an authority. (George Clinton, standing member of Parliament, Funkadelic All Stars, not the one who literally flys the White House Mothership).

Back to the terms of her post, “…a bunch of… cases…” that could further impeachment appears what this is with 23 White House people in contact of leaks across the span of days, not counting noncleared journalists.

A ‘bunch’ sounds like the realm of a RICO suit which is Fitz’s bread and butter.

Before such a library of info was built on Fitz, he was aware of other proceedings and searches would show he could perhaps touch at those GJ(those Chicago papers incidents dealing with other disclosures, paper editor extradition issues). Possibly some info regarding haster’s Edmond’s investigations. Long knives are about to come out there…

Lord knows Ashcroft fell off the radar fast after Fitz elevated. Can they recall the clown back to the town?

There’s such a minefield of corruption to sort through.

It looks like Edmonds was working the other side of the Plame sphere of influence. One was with CIA the other along State/DoD/FBI. Again the two seperate fields of focus and evidence gathering converge.

I think Fitz lets the evidence stand, can make a brief statement, one that will be the sound byte to start black monday this time next week.
Pressure and heat will focus to an event horizon and all kinds of scandals will erupt.

Edmunds can touch back on the DeLay/Al Qaeida contacts, Hastert’s paws all over it, and reconnect the rat wingers to the Ronnie Earle investigations by the time it goes full circle.

Then there’s still curveball and Chalabi’s seized info, coerced fake testimony, and the AQ Khan/Iran encryption compromise to consider.

Again, like the attorney firings and the Plame outing, AQ Khan’s communique monitor was disclosed by leaking portions of his network chatter in its entirety.

Plame could talk about that alone and bring down the DoD and State probably the FBI with it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/02/13/wiran113.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/02/13/ixnewstop.html

would you be willing to expound on that? (or offline if not here)
thanks

As for Karl Rove, he knows why the caged bird sings. Five trips to Fitz and he sang like a canary. He’s about to go down in flames over the New Orleans water pumps that Jeb sold and have broken down. Refugee camps, undocumented holding facilities for Katrina contracts, putting an unqualified Federal in my District.

You’re damned lucky my family friend, a lifelong Republican prosecutor, was ill or I’d have asked him to compel a higher court to act on your extraconstitutional tresspass, mandanmus.

My Senators are already calling for your Resignation. You tried to set up another Arkansas Project. Over a district that has served its share of rotations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In 6th grade Arkansas History class the most famous description of outlaws is “G.T.T.”

“Gone To Texas” is where the wanted posters profiles went, often to be deputized or work for whoever the local man was. Or to gamble and rustle cattle.

Things have changed since then. Ronnie Earle runs a different show. The former Nation of Texas will probably reclaim one of its own. You shouldn’t have burned any bridges there, and the Bull you rustled and herded is about to have its day. DeLay is already up the river for his gambling vice and he’s eating his own now.

In the meantime you can get ready for trustee orange. We look forward to seeing you in transit often.

His case was crafted quite narrow, sentencing will reveal the depth he can discuss.

Asking him questions could put Congress in the uneasy position of being corrected on record before answers come forth. Fitz does not deserve to face partisan rhetoric, as he disabled it in trial and took the high rode not calling the VP forward.

This could be their chance to spill the beans in a way that may actually window some immunity as well. Let Fitz do what Fitz does. He doesn’t have need to take the path of a Kenneth Starr. His case stood on its own merits and he in no way would be necessary to wage a war of process.

Unless others appearing have that intent. His status may open a window formerly classified professionals can no longer discuss in full.

Fitz could feel compelled to come forward or act upon discovery. Let him weigh that possibility.

Ugh: Victoria Toensing? Is she capable of telling the truth, even under oath? Will she do that coy little sideways thing she does on TV, especially when she’s, uh, skirting the truth and making you think she’s got the inside scoop?

And no diGenova?? I thought they were a team, like Laurel and Hardy.

Don’t answer that …

The first time I thought this was in my early twenties, during the Watergate hearings.

Now in addition to this, we also have subpoenas in the U.S. Attorney firings.

Moments to remember.