- What is the content of his real, original (sealed) birth certificate?
- Whether or not he travelled on an Indonesian passport to Pakistan in 1981?
- Why he lied to the State of Illinois in 1991 when he registered as an attorney? He stated that he did not have any former names. It has been proven that when he was in Indonesia (or even before?) he was called Barry Soetoro and the fact is indicated on his school registration papers, which also lists him as a Muslim.
- What do the adoption papers say about his being adopted by Lolo Soetoro?
- Why documents relating to his university studies have been closed to the public?
- Why he claims the authorship of papers and writings that he never wrote?
- Why he never wrote one article for the Harvard Law Review when he was its president?
- Why he has never really severed ties with ACORN and the 1960s Weather Underground Terrorists Group and its leader/co-founder Bill Ayers?
- Why he has not released campaign contribution information concerning the origin of contributions from foreign countries, which is against the laws of the United States of America?
- Why he never refers to the President of the United States of America, George W. Bush, with the official title of the office that he presently possesses. If he wants to be President, then he should at least respect the position and the people who hold it.
- Why he has always supported his wife Michelle in her ever-occurring tirades against the United States of America, until approxi9mately two months ago, when she suddenly realized that Barack Hussein Obama might become President.
- Why he does not want to be called by his complete (legal?) name, Barack Hussein Obama?
- Why does he almost always refer to his mother’s ancestry, but practically never to his father’s? If he cannot find pride in his African roots, then he can never be proud as a President, and can never represent a proud nation, for the source of pride is in the complete individual.
- The list could go on ad infinitum.
Of course, Presidential candidates should really know about domestic affairs, international relations, and the economy. But …
1. Domestic affairs to Barack Hussein Obama are nothing more than organizing communities and stating lies to Illinois state government departments.
2. His policies on international relations, he says, will be reliant on the advice of his Vice-Presidential running mate, Joe Biden, who as a United States Senator played up to the Russian negotiators in the 1970 Salt-2 Talks, unofficially telling them not to worry about position of the United States of America on Europe, because “…he (Joe Biden) personally and other members of the US Senate do not very much care about the Europeans’ concerns.” Furthermore, “…Biden and (Senator)Lugar said that, in the end of the day, they were not so much concerned with having a problem (with the basic human rights) of this or that citizen.” “In other words, the collocutors directly admitted that what is happening is a kind of a show, that they absolutely do not care for the fate of most so-called dissidents.”
The quotations are from the memo by Vadim V. Zagladin, deputy head of the International Department of the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) Central Committee titled ON THE BASIC CONTENTS OF TALKS WITH THE US SENATORS, written between 9-20 April 1979 and originally classified as TOP SECRET by the Soviet Union. It has been declassified by the Russian government.)
3. He presents himself to the American voter as the know-it-all economist. He is not. The facts are as follows:
Economic trends and market stimulations come in circular paths with ups and downs in the market economy. The rule is that if a presidential administration passes laws affecting the national economy, in the long range, it will take up to four to eight years for this legislation to become fully effective. Based upon this reality, the economic legislation passed by the George Bush Sr. presidential administration took effect under President Clinton, and those economic legislative bills passed by the Clinton administration came into effect during the George Bush Jr. presidential administration. Barack Hussein Obama is taking the citizenry as a fool when Barack Hussein Obama claims that only the Democrats are the real economic knows-it-all personalities, and that the Republicans do not know anything that has to do with national or international economics. President Clinton happened to be President when new, developing computer-based technologies created job opportunities. The economic impulse was its own motor in the New Economy. The Clinton Administration did not have much to do with its success. The economic upswing started to get out of control in approximately the last 18 months of the Clinton Administration. The full effect of the blown-up-economic-bubble burst of the New Economy came under the Presidency of George W. Bush Jr. Had George W. Bush Sr. been elected to a second term of office, he would have received credit for the estimated 23 million jobs.
Furthermore, the present-day international banking crisis was not caused by Republicans alone, particularly not by President George W. Bush alone. Barack Hussein Obama fails to accept the truth that the present banking crisis has its roots in the Presidency of James Earl Carter, a Democrat. In 1977 the Carter Administration passed legislation that forced banks to make bad loans to people who could not afford them. In 1998-99 Clinton pushed reform legislation that made Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae take on more risk. In 2004 and 2005 the Republicans tried to tighten up control on the two national lenders, but they were rebuffed by Barney Frank, a Democrat responsible for overseeing the banks and lending institutions. It is interesting to note that the Democrats have a majority in both houses and the two overseeing chairs are occupied by Representative Barney Frank (D) of Massachusetts, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Senator Christopher Dodd (D) of Connecticut, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. They are not calling for any special investigations into the cause of the banking crisis. Surely, if Republicans were chairing these committees, the Democrats would demand that they be relieved of their duties.
Republicans make mistakes. But they admit them and say that they can and will learn from them. Democrats take the opposite stance.
Barack Hussein Obama’s incapability to understand the truth convinces me that his economic prowess has no veracity. John McCain’s economic views, on the other hand, are exceedingly more convincing because they are concreted with logic.
My conclusions after reading and closely examining all of Barack Hussein Obama’s so-called great speeches, with Barack Hussein Obama’s so-called great oratory, Barack Hussein Obama’s so-called perfect answers and comments in the Presidential debates, and Barack Hussein Obama’s so-called genius solutions for the United States of America are three-fold:

1. Barack Hussein Obama is a true charlatan.
2. Barack Hussein Obama is an outright falsifier and historical revisionist.
3. Barack Hussein Obama is the perfect present-day symbol of the following quotation: “The people want to be lied to, and if the lie is big enough, they will believe it.” (The source of the quotation is Josef Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister for Propaganda.)

Barack Hussein Obama is of one kind only. Barack Hussein Obama has only one principle: self-interest instead of the interests of the United States of America. Barack Hussein Obama has only one desire: to insult, dishonour, and spread falsehoods. Barack Hussein Obama has only one truth: don’t tell it. Barack Hussein Obama has only one -crisy: hypocrisy. Barack Hussein Obama has only one dice: cowardice to face up to the truth.

I know some Americans who are already considering renouncing their American citizenship should Barack Hussein Obama be elected President. I personally fear that the bottom line comes down to the fact that if Barack Hussein Obama becomes President of the United States of America, America and all Americans will be the losers. Should Barack Hussein Obama lose the election, then America and all Americans will become winners.

Perhaps a better epithet for Barack Hussein Obama is The Pied Piper from Illinois. If elected President, he will start the Great American Sell-Out, take everything way from Americans so that only -rats exist.

Wouldn’t you call Barack Hussein Obama a liar?

Frederick William Dame
(Dr. rer. pol.; Dr. Phil.; D. Litt.)

Political Scientist, Philologist, Literatus,
Diploma in Cultural Relations,
MA Eng., MS Ed., MA Int. Rel., BA Pol. Sci.,
Academician, Comparativist, Educator,
Technological and Cultural Historian
Universal Consultant

Wow, there it is again: “conversational hypnotism”, made to sound like dirty pool.

Believe it or not, in the reality outside this blog, this is known as simply, “argument” or to be grand, “persuasive speech”.

I note in passing that I was advised recently here in comments that facts do not constitute an argument.

Read that again: Facts do not constitute an argument.

The chock-fulla-facts comment I wrote and which was referred to was swiftly deleted along with the admonishment (you know, for continuity’s sake).

This is where you are and who you are, and don’t ever forget it.

As is the belief that the reason Obama isn’t connecting is solely because of racism. If anything the fact that they both couldn’t seal the deal proves that the DNC should stop trying to hoist elite liberals on the American populace.

Clinton, a centrist, and someone the media and the DNC treated like ignorant hicks when they ran, could seal the deal. He didn’t go out of his way to repeatedly insult the very same people he wanted their vote such as Obama has for months on end. Why this simple fact of not insulting people as a campaign stragedy hasn’t dawned on the Obama team is beyond me. But apparently, it has escaped you as well.

Obama is a fool to run from his middle name and call anyone racist for using it. Place the blame on Obama for his thin skin over his name. Every President is referred to by their initials except Obama which is a result of his definition not anyone else’s. Just like in real life, when someone has delicate sensibilities over something so small. They are bound to get needled over it. It represents Obama’s lack of faith in the America people who have voted for him. It represents his weakness as a man, to not stand up for himself as well. And it represents his own racism against the masses.

Sorry bud, trying to smear a stranger on the net as racist is also ignorant on so many levels.

You have no idea about my life or anyone else’s. I was raised to confront racism and not stand by when it reveals itself. My life has been threatened repeatedly by real racists. The kind that kill people and yes they were white.

So while you confront people you assume are racists from the comfort of your house. Don’t think it carries any weight with people who have confronted the dangerous type of racists in their lives.

If you had any intellectual integrity in basing your argument on racism. Then you would be able to argue for yourself the very questions you pose. Especially, since Obama is trying to sell himself to America and has already had an Anthem scandal. It is just smart campaigning to learn from previous mistakes and keep that flank secure from attack.

Keep up, little grasshopper. You are learning well the techniques of conversational hypnotism. Someday you too can hoodwink and bamboozle.