Senator Obama, Your Arrogance Is Showing
By Anita Finlay ("Ani") on October 17, 2008 at 3:35 PM in Arrogance, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
Careful, Senator, we just got another glimpse of the real you: the true character you try so desperately to hide. Better cover that up real quick!
Senator Obama gave an interview which will run in The NY Times this Sunday, or as we like to call the ex-paper of record, the BOTimes. I guess we know in advance what kind of an objective, probing piece it will be.
Obama, in a feeble effort, I suppose, to win back the votes of Pennsylvanians and any others he offended with his now infamous ‘bitter voters’ comments back in April, has just characterized his own statement as “boneheaded.”
That sounds familiar. Another boneheaded mistake, Senator? Like buying your home with the assistance of Tony Rezko, then under indictment, now a convicted criminal? You called that “boneheaded,” too.
Boneheaded seems to be Obama’s favorite catch-all phrase for ‘don’t hold me responsible for any lapses in judgment or possible criminal actions.’ It is a disgraceful term to use because it sounds like Obama is being self-deprecating, but actually his goal is more insidious -– to belittle any concern someone might express about his wrong actions in the first place.
For anyone here who doesn’t remember the brouhaha back in April, CNN’s Political Ticker reports that Obama is making a little revisionist history via the NYT. These were Senator Obama’s original comments:
You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not.
I love the way Obama lumps the Clinton administration in with the Bush administration – as if the citizens he is talking about were falling through the cracks during Bill’s tenure in office. The truth is, they did well with him, as did most Americans, considering we had eight years of peace and prosperity, great job growth, a balanced budget and an enormous budget surplus. So much for lie number one.
Now here’s the “boneheaded” part:
“And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Really?
And here is Obama’s statement to the BOTimes, I mean, the NYTimes, attempting to smooth over his big booboo that arguably cost him the Pennsylvania primary:
Speaking to the New York Times in an interview set to be published Sunday, Obama said his now-infamous comments at a San Francisco fundraiser last April — during which he said some small town Americans “cling” to guns and religion — was “my biggest boneheaded move.”
“How it was interpreted in the press was Obama talking to a bunch of wine-sipping San Francisco liberals with an anthropological view toward white working-class voters. And I was actually making the reverse point, clumsily, which is that these voters have a right to be frustrated because they’ve been ignored. And because Democrats haven’t met them halfway on cultural issues, we’ve not been able to communicate to them effectively an economic agenda that would help broaden our coalition.”
Uh huh.
“Obama talking to a bunch of wine-sipping San Francisco liberals with an anthropological view toward white working-class voters” – yes that is correct, Senator Obama. It is an anthropological view and an ignorant and class-ist view as well. What it “looked like” is exactly what it was.
Senator Obama observes: his head tipped to one side with his nose in the air, as if he is looking at a bug under a glass.
Well, he had six months to come up with his ‘revisionist’ sound byte. Is it working for you?
The problem I have with it is that now, Senator Obama is out on the campaign trail deriding and belittling Joe the Plumber, a man who simply asked Senator Obama a question about his economic policy:
“This is the guy John McCain is fighting for…how many plumbers do you know making a quarter million dollars?”
And what is wrong with John McCain fighting for Joe the plumber or any of us? What was Obama trying to say here? Why is his crowd laughing at this?
Clearly, Obama is an elitist; an arrogant snob who cannot conceive of anyone making that kind of money who didn’t go to Harvard. A small business owner, with a plumbing company and a couple of employees, would easily make that kind of money. And that is precisely the question that Joe Wurzelbacher was innocently posing to Senator Obama a few days ago in reference to buying a plumbing business.
Does it occur to these DNC fools that is why every single one of them, except for Bill Clinton, lost the Presidential election these past 30 years? We don’t like elitists who treat everyone else like “the fly-over people.”
And now, for Joe’s trouble, he has been subjected to ridicule by both Obama and Biden – you know, the Democrats; the party of the working person. Further, Joe’s life has been turned upside down, his privacy has been invaded and he is under attack by news media and by Obama’s more virulent supporters.
We now know more about Joe’s personal business in 48 hours than we do about the frontrunner for President of the United States.
We have not even seen Senator Obama’s genuine birth certificate, his college records, his state senate records, or his medical records. But we know about Joe the plumber having a tax lien. This is outrageous.
Senator Obama cannot help himself. His arrogance shines through. His willingness to rip anyone apart who has the temerity to question him once again displays a weak, petty and self-aggrandizing nature that is surely a poor fit for the Presidency.
Senator Obama can run, but he can’t hide. Belittling Joe Wurzelbacher, belittling Governor Palin, belittling and deriding small town voters, deriding Hillary’s voters as low-information and racist – it is all the same.
And the message is clear. Anyone who does not fall in like to support ‘the One’, or as John McCain characterized him, “that One,” will fall victim to ugly and disrespectful attack. Arrogance is as arrogance does.
As Hillary Clinton correctly pointed out:
“People don’t need a president who looks down on them, they need a president who stands up for them.“
I, for one, have had enough of an arrogant bully in the White House these last eight years. I will not help elect another one simply because he parades around with a (D) after his name.

















