RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

The Media Conga Line to Fellate Obama

For those of you offended by the sexual imagery I can’t apologize. When you have the likes of Chris Matthews talking about the tingle up his leg from hearing Obama speak I can think of no other term more appropriate than one normally used to define oral sex in polite company. As we have seen, Matthews and the other fellators at MSNBC are not alone. They are part of a media gaggle that encompasses most of what passes for “Main Stream Media” aka MSM.

I commend the readers and commentators at No Quarter for helping make this piece possible. So here goes.

First up, surprise of surprises, Keith Olberman’s interview of Barack Obama. I haven’t seen that much man on man love action since I watched Brokeback Mountain. Critical difference–nobody dies in Keith’s version (Hat tip, OhVoter). Check this out:

OLBERMANN: This is more about campaign tactics to start with rather than issues. But it seems sometimes like tactics have replaced issues altogether. “He fights pork barrel spending,” said this new McCain/Palin ad, “she stopped the ‘Bridge to Nowhere.’”
I mean, it sounds a little like “Remington Steele,” but I’m confused otherwise. As late as October of 2006, Mrs. Palin insisted to voters in Alaska that not only would she defend that infamous bridge, but she also said — and here’s the quote — “She would not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project or any other into something that’s so negative.” What are Sen. McCain and Governor Palin doing in this new commercial, do you think?

OLBERMANN: And Governor Palin hired a lobbyist to get earmarks to the tune of $27 million for a 6,000-person town which is — in its own scope, is kind of a neat trick, but it does seem to counterbalance the basic platform of the Republican Party. You said that they’re not telling the truth here, but when the stuff is a gross distortion, whether it’s about their own positions or yours, or facts in your history or whatever, what can you do about it? And why do people hesitate to use the word “lie” about these things? And Governor Palin hired a lobbyist to get earmarks to the tune of $27 million for a 6,000-person town which is — in its own scope, is kind of a neat trick, but it does seem to counterbalance the basic platform of the Republican Party. You said that they’re not telling the truth here, but when the stuff is a gross distortion, whether it’s about their own positions or yours, or facts in your history or whatever, what can you do about it? And why do people hesitate to use the word “lie” about these things?

OLBERMANN: To something from your own convention, maybe the most compelling moment of your acceptance speech in Denver was that one strongly voiced word, “enough.” A lot of people who have felt angry about what has been done to this country in the last seven or eight years have that same sense of urgency and simplicity to it. Have you thought of using on the campaign trail and in your speaking engagements, more exclamation points? Have you thought of getting angrier?

OLBERMANN: But clearly it must not be fully on their minds because the race is as close as it is. And nobody’s burst into laughter at the latest Republican ad, at least not many Republicans have. Have the Republicans succeeded in muddying up this election in kind of overcomplicating it so the point is not as simple as you just made it. Sixty years ago Harry Truman went out and campaigned very simply, looked out at people in trouble because of a Republican Congress at that point and the impact it had on their lives and he said, “How many more times do you have to be hit over the head till you figure out who’s hitting you?” I mean, has your campaign in some way not kept it that simple?

OLBERMANN: You pointed out last week how little time at their convention Republicans spent talking about the economy. I think the time might have been zero, zero, zero. I’m not sure. We weren’t running a clock. But if the election does, in fact, hinge on the economy, on how Americans are doing, has there been thought given to breaking this down to its simplest element, in much the way one of the Republican icons, Mr. Reagan did during the 1980 campaign, and ask the voters if today, are you better off now than you were eight years ago?

OLBERMANN: In terms of getting that and other messages out, Rachel Maddow wanted me to ask this question, so I’m doing this on her behalf, because her new show is starting tonight. Given — given the tone that the campaign has taken, I mean, this Georgia congressman last week, Mr. Westmoreland, who called you and your wife, quote, “Uppity.” In that context, do you regret putting the brakes on the 527 groups who would have produced or could have produced hard-hitting ads that would have been sharing your sympathies?

OLBERMANN: One more campaign question. It pertains to not knowing someone or something. This is a question I have not really heard asked directly of anybody in a position perhaps to answer it, let alone answered. In your opinion, is Governor Palin experienced enough and qualified enough to become president of the United States in the relatively short-term future?

Unfortunately, Keith is not alone. How about Katie Couric, ankle biter extraordinaire? Thanks to Mimi and McHope we have the record of Katie teeing off on Sarah Palin while giving Joe Biden everything but a Thailand “Happy Ending.”

COURIC V OBAMA (July 23, 2008) After more than a year campaigning – ALL FOREIGN POLICY

1) Sen. Obama, first of all, you have not been to Iraq since 2006. What did you learn on your recent visit that surprised you? Or what was new?

2) You and Prime Minister Maliki (are) on the same page when it comes to a troop withdrawal by 2010. Why do you believe that the Iraqi security forces, which have taken so long to get up to speed, will be equipped to protect the country at that point?

3) You talk about a residual force remaining in Iraq, but you’ve been hesitant to really give a number to people. You haven’t been specific, though some of your advisors have said it could be tens of thousands of troops. Why can’t you be more specific as to what you envision?

4) Having said that, if General Petraeus or the chairman of the joint chiefs, Admiral Mullen, say to you, “Hey, President Obama …” if that comes to pass, “you cannot take out the final complement of combat troops. You need them in theater,” you would say?

5) And base your decision still on conditions on the ground as well?

6) Before the surge, as you know, Senator, there were 80 to 100 U.S. casualties a month, the country was rife with sectarian violence, and you raised a lot of eyebrows on this trip saying even knowing what you know now, you still would not have supported the surge. People may be scratching their heads and saying, “Why?”

7) All that may be true. But do you not give the surge any credit for reducing violence in Iraq?

But talking microcosmically, did the surge, the addition of 30,000 additional troops … help the situation in Iraq?

9)(more of a comment) But yet you’re saying … given what you know now, you still wouldn’t support it … so I’m just trying to understand this.

10) And I really don’t mean to belabor this, Senator, because I’m really, I’m trying … to figure out your position. Do you think the level of security in Iraq …would exist today without the surge?

11) If you believe, Senator, Afghanistan is, in fact, the central front in the war on terror, why was this your first trip there? And why didn’t you hold a single hearing as chairman of the subcommittee that oversees the fighting force there?

12) You reportedly chaff when your foreign policy expertise is questioned. If foreign policy is not your weakest area of expertise, what is? (Obama said disorganization)

13) But what area do you feel least comfortable with?

14) We have a lot more ground to cover. You’re heading to Israel after Jordan. And according to a recent poll out of Jerusalem, Israeli Jews favor John McCain for President 43 to 20 percent, with one-third undecided. Why do you think that’s the case?

15) There is some speculation, there is skepticism there because they’re concerned about your previously stated notion of having talks with Iranian leaders, that somehow that signals to them that you won’t be tough enough to Iran. What’s your response to that?

16) If they reject negotiations, how likely do you think a preemptive military strike by Israel against Iran may be?

17) Two more questions. You said not too long ago that Jerusalem should remain undivided. And then you backtracked on that statement. Does that play into the argument that some believe that someone more experienced would not have made that kind of mistake?

18) Finally, you’ll be going to Germany and to France and Great Britain. And according to German press reports, as many as a million people may be gathering to hear your speech in Berlin. Do you worry at all, Sen. Obama, that this kind of crowd in Berlin may be slightly off-putting to the guy in Columbus, Ohio, who’s just lost his job?

http://www.electionspeeches.com/barack_obama_katie_couric.htm

SUBJECTS covered: Iraq trip, surge, Afghanistan why he did not hold a committee hearing, What is Obama’s weakest area, Israeli Jews support for McCain, negotiations with Iran, divided versus undivided Israel, what people in Ohio will think of his trip to Europe

COURIC V. PALIN Sept. 24, 2008 (3 weeks after receiving the VP nomination)

PART 1 – Domestic issue

1)(Couric Asked Palin about Rick Davis’ firm having received money from Fannie Mae)

2)But he still has a stake in the company so isn’t that a conflict of interest?

3)Why do you say that? Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama?

4)(more of a comment)But polls have shown that Sen. Obama has actually gotten a boost as a result of this latest crisis, with more people feeling that he can handle the situation better than John McCain.

5)If this doesn’t pass, do you think there’s a risk of another Great Depression?

6)Would you support a moratorium on foreclosures to help average Americans keep their homes?

7)So you haven’t decided whether you’ll support it or not?

8)What are the pros and cons of it do you think?

9)You’ve said, quote, “John McCain will reform the way Wall Street does business.” Other than supporting stricter regulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two years ago, can you give us any more example of his leading the charge for more oversight?

10)(more of a comment) But he’s been in Congress for 26 years. He’s been chairman of the powerful Commerce Committee. And he has almost always sided with less regulation, not more.

11)But can you give me any other concrete examples? Because I know you’ve said Barack Obama is a lot of talk and no action. Can you give me any other examples in his 26 years of John McCain truly taking a stand on this?

12) I’m just going to ask you one more time – not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation.

PART 2: FOREIGN AFFAIRS

13) As we stand before this august building and institution, what do you see as the role of the United States in the world?

14) In preparing for this conversation, a lot of our viewers … and Internet users wanted to know why you did not get a passport until last year. And they wondered if that indicated a lack of interest and curiosity in the world.

15) Gov. Palin, you’ve had a very busy week. And you’re meeting with many world leaders. You met with President Karzai of Afghanistan. I know the McCain campaign has called for a surge in Afghanistan. But that country is, as you know, dramatically different than Iraq. Why do you believe additional troops, U.S. troops, will solve the problem there?

16) The United States is deeply unpopular in Pakistan. Do you think the Pakistani government is protecting al Qaeda within its borders?

17) You’ve cited Alaska’s proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?

18) Have you ever been involved in any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?

19) When President Bush ran for office, he opposed nation-building. But he has spent, as you know, much of his presidency promoting democracy around the world. What lessons have you learned from Iraq? And how specifically will you try to spread democracy throughout the world?

20) You met yesterday with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who is for direct diplomacy with both Iran and Syria. Do you believe the U.S. should negotiate with leaders like President Assad and Ahmadinejad?

21) You recently said three times that you would never, quote, “second guess” Israel if that country decided to attack Iran. Why not?

SUBJECTS covered in Part 1: Rick Davis’ firm and Fannie Mae, Economic crisis, will there be a Depression without the bailout, does she support the bailout, what are the pros and cons of the bailout, moratorium on foreclosures, McCain’s record on regulation as it relates to mortgage crisis

SUBJECTS covered in Part 2: US role in the world, why she did not have a passport until last year, a surge strategy (additional troops) in Afghanistan, whether or not Pakistan is harboring al Qaeda in its borders, why she said Alaska’s proximity to Russia gives her foreign affairs experience, has she ever negotiated with Russia, Bush and nation-building and whether or not she will spread democracy in the world, does she agree with Kissinger that there should be direct negotiations with Iran and Syria, why she wouldn’t second-guess Israel, if it decided to attack Iran

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/24/eveningnews/main4476173.shtml

COURIC V BIDEN – September 22, 2008

1) Polls show that Sen. McCain and Sarah Palin are making inroads among white female voters who are less educated…

2) How is it preparing for the debates?

3) Are you worried that you’re going to have to pull your punches a bit because of her gender and you don’t want to seem like you’re bullying her? It’s a different dynamic when it’s a male/female thing, isn’t it?

4) Are you disappointed with the tone of the campaign? The ‘lipstick on the pig’ stuff, and some of the ads – you guys haven’t been completely guilt-free making fun of John McCain’s inability to use a computer.

5) Why did you do it then?

6) Did Obama approve that ad?

SUBJECTS covered: whether or not McCain was making inroads with women voters, how are preparations for the debate, will he have to adjust how he debates because his opponent is a woman, negative campaigning, did Obama approve of the ad about McCain’s inability to use a computer

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/22/eveningnews/main4470063.shtml

Oh wait! Dammit!! Katie forgot to ask Biden whether he preferred puppies or kittens.

The double dealing of CBS was not limited to Sarah Palin, check out VinceP1974′s contribution–the CBS interviews of Michelle Obama and Cindy McCain respectively:

CBS interviewing potential First Lady Michelle Obama

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Finish this sentence.

MS. RODRIGUEZ: “I wish I was more” —

MS. RODRIGUEZ: “I wish Barack” — “I wish Barack wasn’t so” —

MS. RODRIGUEZ: I knew you’d say that. Who cooks at home?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Yeah.

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Are you a good cook?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: If he’s had a long day and he just wants to come home and have Michelle’s what — what’s the best meal you make that he loves?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Is there ever a time, at the end of the day, when you and Senator Obama are home and you just think, “What have we gotten ourselves into?”

MS. RODRIGUEZ: (Laughs.) Which doesn’t happen?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: What do your girls say they want to be when they grow up?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Favorite romantic movie. And can you recite a line from it?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Best spontaneous romantic gesture from your husband.

MS. RODRIGUEZ: How many years?

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Wow.

MS. RODRIGUEZ: Where do you see yourself in 16 years?

=================================

CBS interviewing potential First Lady Cindy McCain [Questions only]

(CBS) CBS News anchor Katie Couric talked one-on-one with Cindy McCain about her husband’s selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his running mate. They also discussed social issues, such as abortion. Couric began by asking McCain if the governor has been rattled by the intense media scrutiny

Katie Couric: When did you and your husband first discuss her as a possibility?

Couric: Do you feel confident, Mrs. McCain, that the vetting process which is getting a lot of attention was as thorough as it needed to be and that Sen. McCain knew everything he needed to know?

Couric: The scuttlebutt, if you will, behind the scenes is that Sen. McCain really wanted Joe Lieberman to be his running mate, but social conservatives would have found him unacceptable because of his position on abortion.

Couric: Some, even Republicans, seemed surprised that Sen. McCain picked a running mate who opposes abortion even in the cases of rape and incest, and believes creationism should be taught in schools. And I’m just curious, do you agree with that?

Couric: Where do you stand on abortion?

Couric: So do you oppose it even in cases of rape and incest?

Couric: So that’s where you two differ in terms of your position on that.

Couric: And do you believe Roe V. Wade should be overturned?

Couric: No. Why not? Your husband does.

Couric: He believes it should be overturned. That’s what he told me, and that it should go to the states.

Couric: So, you believe it should be overturned or shouldn’t be overturned.

Couric: How do you feel about creationism? Do you think it should be taught in schools?

We could keep this up all night but I think you get the picture. There is a media bias and they are out to destroy McCain and Palin. Pure and simple.

  • Bud White

    LMAO!!! It’s so true…they LOVE BHO

  • TheDNCCant’sShutMeUp

    No apologies required Larry. The imagery is apropos – all that’s missing is the porno music in the background.

    Bow-chicka-wow-wow …

  • TheDNCCan’tShutMeUp

    Just waiting for one of them to blush, bat their eyelashes and say “Isn’t he just dreamy?”

  • workingclass artist

    Classic Larry…You rock!

  • DeniseVB

    Larry David’s puff on Huffpoo:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-david/waiting-for-nov-4th_b_137029.html

    I just don’t understand this.

  • Steven Mather

    The proof is in the putting/pudding. Unfortunately, they do not let facts cloud their judgment.

    http://mapleblood.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/barack-is-iraq-mainstream-media-betrays-the-public-trust-again/

  • Liz B

    The funny thing is, this same group of people will turn on him in a heartbeat. Once he is elected (If he is), the honeymoon will last about 3 or 4 months and the first sign of a lack of public interest and they are going to start actually vetting him. Once that starts and they see how productive that can be, they will saturate the newspapers, news, and magazines with all the stuff we here at NQ have been discussing for quite some time now.
    These are the same people who created Britney, and JLo, the same people who literally hounded Princess Diana to death. They are vicious, heartless souls and for once I can’t wait to see the fall from grace and the resulting onslaught of attacks.

  • Newly Independent

    Thanks for this post Larry.

    You’re right – the bastards in the MSM are absolutely sickening and have been since January. I’ve been through with them. Let the Obamabrats keep those bulls— networks and newspapers. Real Americans don’t need their asses.

    It’s wonderful to have the internet and blogs like yours to go to. They keep us strong. Strong enough to shut down Obama in less than two weeks.

  • astonished

    Good god this site has gone down hill in the past few months.

    You people are all so miserable. Its a shame.

  • Manu

    Obama will probably win because McCain is unwilling to go medieval on Obama’s ass. Yet we can take comfort on the following:

    *This is a year in which the republicans are despised by the general population and Democrats should be having no trouble winning.
    *Obama is trying to buy the election with a multi-million dollar campaign (funded in part with illegal contributions)
    *The Republican candidate is disliked by his base.
    *The main stream media is bending over backwards and forwards for Obama while savaging his opposition.

    And still Obama can’t close the deal. This shouldn’t even be a close race, and yet Obama is so lame that he might just lose this election.

  • Bell’Artista

    I don’t know….maybe I have strange taste but…….
    I find Obama repulsive
    or should I say Frank M Davis Jr. repulsive.

    yeah, I know, some people think Andy Martin wears a tin hat, and w/o a paternity test, there’s no proof, bla bla bla
    but everything about Obama is built on lies, but I guess that’s unimportant to a lot of Americans now.

    It really is a shame for those of us who can’t afford to get out of this once grand and now pitiful brainwashed nation of fools.

    I can’t write what I hope for.

  • jrterrier

    the best revenge is that apparently the three anchors have lost viewership — not to mention respect.

    ELECTION REJECTION: NETWORK NEWS SLUMPS; VIEWERSHIP FADES
    Wed Oct 22 2008 07:25:40 ET

    The Obama-McCain match-up is proving to be a lackluster election ticket for the Big 3 network news programs, according to NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH.

    As the shouting from the trail and the frantic spinning from the anchor desks intensify, the audience is voting with their remotes.

    All 3 evening news shows experienced audience drops year-to-year for the week of Oct. 13-19, 2008.

    CBSNEWS w/ Couric shed a half a million viewers, falling from 6.4 million to 5.9 million; ABCNEWS dropped from 8.1 million to 7.6 million; NBCNEWS slumped from 8.2 million to 7.8 million.

  • Sarracuda In So Cal

    Ya know whats funny, the dumb asses at the media don’t have any clue why their ratings have dropped, gee maybe its all the BIAS reporting they have done and licked Obama’s nuts every second

  • Patti

    I guess they like their orgy fest over Obama. Its a really bad visual.

    If Obama loses, they will have to make sure they have a “mental health” rider on their insurance.

  • Diana L. C.

    I’ve often thought that was their plan in the first place: Get him elected so that they can continue for four years having major crises to cover each night. Can you imagine the advertising dollars that will rake in? It will pay for what they have to pay to cover Dreamy’s election night coverage.

  • Newly Independent

    Crawl back under a rock. And die.

  • Sarracuda In So Cal

    I would just LOVE and I mean I would tape it, to see John McCain and Sarah Palin WIN, and turn over to CNN and tape them all crying and bitching about how they worked so hard to get him elected and how they were screwed, I bet you that Campbell Brown would jump off the CNN Atlanta Building, then I would switch over to BS NBC and watch Chris Matthews have another tingle up his leg, but this time it would turn out to be a massive stroke, I would go to bed a happy girl :-)

  • JS Ruby

    Between the MSM that clearly biased and the polls that don’t appear to be honest, I really don’t know what to believe anymore. I am going vote JM/SP and hope for the best. If the country goes for BO/JB, they deserve what they get. Just hold on to your wallet.

  • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

    Hi Larry

    In regard to your choice of words I am reminded of a Supreme Court Case in the early 70′s where a college student was charged with a crime for wearing a tee shirt that said “F… the War”. (On his shirt the word was, of course, written in full). The Supreme Court overturned the conviction, saying that sometimes no other word will adequately express a political view.

  • Newly Independent

    ELECTION REJECTION: NETWORK NEWS SLUMPS; VIEWERSHIP FADES
    Wed Oct 22 2008 07:25:40 ET

    This should be a serious hint that the attempted Obama brainwashing by the MSM isn’t working on the masses.

    So faint not McCain supporters! GO VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN ON NOVEMBER 4TH! :-)

  • Ginger

    The MSM is in BHOs pocket because of that 600 million and how much ad revenue he gives them, he’s like a favored advertiser to them, not a political candidate…it seems obvious that the more they make off you, the more they pull their punches and coddle you.

  • lisa in va

    Now THAT would make a good SNL skit!

  • vanroth

    Don’t forget what they did to Hillary.

    Day after day,night after night of endless bashing, twisting her words and seeing some deep, hidden sinister meaning in the most innocuous statements. And Matthews, Olberman, Cafferty, Fineman et al, the most shameless and corrupt of the rotten crop getting all enraged because she was trampling on the hard on they they were getting from fellating Obama. Dirty rotten scoundrels, all of them.

  • http://JohnMcCain.com Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion

    LMAO:

    The Media Conga Line to Fellate Obama

    I saw this subject in the listing and knew right away it was Larry’s post. ;)

  • IndieDogg

    Uphill, and still climbing.

    Stand up!!!

  • http://JohnMcCain.com Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion

    “Attack the messenger” troll. A very rare species about to go extinct by the moderation asteroid. :mrgreen:

  • J. J.. (The P.U.M.A.)

    If I wanted good taste, I wouldn’t be at this web site to begin with.

    Larry is not a guy I would invite to afternoon tea with the ladies of the social club.

  • TeakWoodKite

    I’ll take Obama Fluff for 1000 Alex.

    We could keep this up all night but I think you get the picture

    Who is ______?

  • NYU

    Thank you Larry for this thread. The title alone is priceless.

  • http://medusa2.wordpress.com Medusa

    Treat the troll like a fart–leave them alone to smell what they’ve created.

  • athy

    Vanroth-
    We wont forget what they did to Hillary…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcdnlNZg2iM

    No Sexism in the media ? Do you think the media was fair to Sen Clinton? Watch these clips and you decide…

  • http://N/A breeze

    Imus was on Neil Cavuto this afternoon and called
    Katie Curick a

    RODENT

    I thought Neil would have a seizure, he sputtered
    so badly…….

  • http://JohnMcCain.com Galt, Master Thrall of Planet Triskelion

    Imus was being polite.

  • Newly Independent

    I love your visual!

    Let’s hope it’ll happen on November 5th!

  • athy

    Great post Larry.

    Nothing stings the msm like the facts.
    Thanks for holding up a mirror to their faces.
    Thanks to all the NQ bloggers who continuously provide us with links to their sources of information.

    This election has been so wild. If it wasnt for the internet (including YouTube videos) it would be so easy for us to succumb to revisionist history as to what has occurred during this election.

    We can go back in time & read the articles on the internet, watch the interviews all over again.

    In spite of this fact, I am AMAZED how Sen Obama just keeps rolling on-even when presented with irrefutable proof that he has lied to the public. And many of his supporters do the same…

  • yttik

    LOL! Larry would be shocked by what he heard at afternoon tea.

  • don tufts

    newt was just on greta and told her that cnn was a public relations firm for barky.greta agreed that msnbc was part of barkys effort but she cant agree on cnnn,old loyalties die hard.for those of us who are more computor savvy than i am ,maybee they could email to greata the numerous examples of cnn bias that we have been talking about.larry if your out there i sure you could do this easily.

  • yttik

    I’m not offended, I thought the title was funny.

    For the record, I am not in that conga line. I think I would rather dance in the line Jesse Jackson mentioned.

  • oowawa

    “the Media Conga Line to Fellate Obama”

    Actually, I think it might be a bunny-hop. They drew straws, and Tweety gets to hop in front of The Precious, Herr Uebermann right behind–Okay, all together boys, HOP HOP HOP.

  • hank48188

    I bet that Pervert Frank Davis was molesting that young Obama, his Grandfather threw him to the wolves.

  • http://lesstalkmoreactivism.blogspot.com/ whoframedrudy

    Well, there’s another conga line just waiting for Obama’s other ‘entry point’ — Putin, Iran, the EU can’t wait to run a train on our little Bambi.

  • http://firefox McAnnie Carmel Baracuda

    Larry David just being his usual hyper-neurotic self. Another reason to save my money by not re-upping HBO. Showtime is much better and I don’t pay for Maher or David.

  • http://firefox McAnnie Carmel Baracuda

    I think it’s hilarious that the Left is so frightened that the Republicans are going to steal the election when it’s ACORN doing all the dirty work for the Dems.

    I had a couple of emails in the past week from Greg Palast about he and Bobby Kennedy, Jr., and the comic book they have out about vote theft. They are acting as if this is a serious threat. Maybe it’s just more smoke screen for the voter intimidation, fraud, etc., being run by Barry and the Dems.

  • http://firefox McAnnie Carmel Baracuda

    Dang, I usually watch Neil too. Sorry I missed that one. Well, go Don.

  • Tristan

    This election cycle has really been an eye opener. I’m done with CNN, MSNC, Washington Post, New York Times, etc.

  • http://firefox McAnnie Carmel Baracuda

    Well, the poll on Gretawire didn’t give CNN a pass.

  • http://deleted Buzz Latte

    Oooh, yeah, I agree.

    Obama is not the least bit attractive. He’s fishy creepy. <something my then 3 yr old niece used to say about a betta we had.

    I would never want to shake his hand or be in his presence. Call it intuition. He just emanates bad vibes. YUCK!

    How many world leaders would he creep out?

  • Retired

    Should there be a Larry Sinclair award for the most fawning coverage of Obama?

  • http://medusa2.wordpress.com Medusa

    How long can they fellate Oblowme? It began in 2004 when he gave his “fabulous” speech (good god, are people that stupid?) and then really got blowing during the primaries when the fuckwit was hellbound to destroy Hillary.

    They’re going to have to come up for air eventually. Little whores that they are.

  • MoniQue

    No one dies in Olberman’s version?

    …except TIM RUSSERT.

    Tim was pushing so hard to get Obama elected, remember the last time he was on the air drooling with Oglethorp and Tingle up the leg Matthews about how Hillary was going to lose.

    And this is just ONE person who met their death THROUGH OBAMA the Antichrist, Son of PERDITION.

    I will NEVER call him my president. And I’ve got my passport ready to claim exPatriot if that MONSTER steals this election like he stole the nomination. And he will NEVER get a penny from me to fund his “pet ghetto” projects for those who won’t work.

    I don’t mind giving to Widows and children, but grown men and women who can work but WON’T…no way.

    GO FISH OBAMA!

  • NoBamaNoWay

    those points should be remembered, especially the obscene amount of money the leftists have spent and the sickening MSM complicity. that, and the fact that everything favors the dems this year, and IF barky wins it will be by less than 2pts.

  • Illinois_gal

    Chris “Tingly” Matthews would be happy to head up that conga line.

  • justsomeone

    Wonder who spilled the beans on the cost of Gov Palin’s wardrobe? Is there a mole in his inner circle? Or are the sales ladies at Saks or Neimans Dems? What was really cheezy though was McCain’s camp saying they plan on donating her wardrobe to charity after the election. That’s like saying they plan on loosing or do they envision “Caribou Barbie” jetting around to State Affairs dressed in jeans & ski jackets. Sorry no hats off to whoever is running Mac’s campaign. Meanwhile Michelle is in Vogue & other fashion rags almost weekly. Oh, but some of Michelle’s clothes are done by Chicago designers, so that’s just hometown pride. I saw a documentary where Richard Nixon make a stink about his opponent’s wife’s clothes. How’d that turn out?

  • KFaye

    There is something much larger going on here. The media coverage is so over the top, so frenetic. These “journalists” are acting like their jobs, if not their lives, depend on Barack Obama becoming the next president. The level of vitriol being displayed against Sarah Palin by “professionals” in public can not be explained by garden-variety sexism. Something else is going on here. My God, Barack Obama just got away with saying that JOHN MCCAIN posed a security risk to the United States and it went unchalleged by the press? I’m so angry I can’t think straight!

  • DAB

    Since David claims that if he watches the election returns he will jinx the results, so I hope that he watches the returns.

    Add “Enthusiasm: to the trash heap of shows that I probably can never watch again.

  • DAB

    I wouldn’t count on it. More likely we are in for authoritarian rule with the press as enablers. Unless they get bored of course — which may eventually happen.

  • DAB

    Speaking of Bulls, Campbell Brown should change the name of her show from “No Bias, No Bull” to “Total Bias, Total Bull”!

  • DAB

    The number of Obama ads here in Florida is obscene. It may be annoying and turning people off though because the polls are swinging back towards McCain here.

  • DAB

    Sounds real good to me!

    Glad you haven’t lost your sense of humor.

  • DAB

    Camille Paglia who is an ardent Obama supporter still had the honesty to see what is happening nad referred to Couric as a “viper”.

  • Ivory Bill Woodpecker

    The talking heads and the typing hands of the Corporate Media just do what the corporate fat cats who sign their fat paychecks tell them to do–so the real question is “Why do the corporate fat cats, or at least a faction of them, want Obama?”

  • http://hickeysite.blogspot.com Pat Hickey
  • Northwest rain

    “Why do the corporate fat cats, or at least a faction of them, want Obama?”

    This is the puzzle of this election season.

    (1) On one hand we are told that Obama is a socialist — which seems possible because of Obama’s “spread the wealth” comment to Joe the Plumber.

    (2) Then all the fat-cat corporate types that have dumped $$$ into Obama’s campaign.

    We’ve seen Obama sell out the workers (Union Members) at Maytag and in return he got $$$ from the owners of the company. And sell out the people of his district who lived in Rezko’s slums, claiming he didn’t know that people were freezing in his district.

    My theory is that Obama has no core values — he is for sell to the highest bidder — it is willing to do whatever it takes to obtain his goal. BUT he has absolutely no idea what the hell he is going to do — thus his theft of policies — left, right and center.

    But damn — the idiot surrounds himself with creepy people. One would think that the money bags funding Obama’s campaign would VET the guy before listening to his promises without some sort of guarantee.

    So we return to THE question:

    “Why do the corporate fat cats, or at least a faction of them, want Obama?”

    Hell if I know — and I don’t want to find out.

  • Lizzie Struthers

    Thailand “Happy Ending”.

    Is that what it’s called? ROFL! Great article Larry!

  • Lizzie Struthers

    Oh wait! Dammit!! Katie forgot to ask Biden whether he preferred puppies or kittens.

    LMAO! Larry you are very funny today!!!! :)

  • Phillymiss

    You’re right, the media hatred against McCain/Palin is just so visceral — it’s bizarre and somewhat frightening.

    I don’t think Barky is handsome either — I know this is mean, but WHAT IS THAT THING ON THE SIDE OF HIS NOSE??

  • Ivory Bill Woodpecker

    Wall Street owns Obama’s bony ass, so if the fat cats decide that Ayers, for example, actually poses a threat to their interests, Billy Boy will go under the bus faster than he can say “Off The Pigs!” ;)

  • Soldier of Christ

    Troll…….you wouldn’t be on this blog unless it frightens you. So, go back to Barky and tell him that this blog will last forever because it is the NEW Network for ALL the people and the patriot People of the United States.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHjFxJVeCQs dgr

    Thass Right Larry! If they are not actively fellating him, they are working as his fluffers.

  • Phillymiss

    How come no one comments on the fact that Mrs. Barky has been on Vanity Fair’s International Best-Dressed List for two years?

    You’re right, if Palin went around looking like a slob the media would REALLY jump on her. She just can’t win . . . she has a lot more poise than me because I would tell the media PHUCK OFF, YA BEATCHES!

  • Rob G in Chicago

    RObama Hood’s $600 million does not just buy ads on the major networks. His campaign follows the Alinsky advice that he doles out, “GET IN THEIR FACE”. While Illinois is certainly in the bag for Barky, he continues to saturate the airwaves in Chicago on both TV and radio. I have released my inner “bubba”, and I listen to a lot of country music on US-99 in Chicago, and I watch country music videos on TV late at night. You would not think that these are media outlets that would appeal to Obama’s base, but he is all over the airwaves on the country stations on TV and radio. I am wearing out the buttons and batteries of my remotes, as I can’t change the channel fast enough to get away from his annoying patois.

  • Soldier of Christ

    That is why we here in Florida use our remote control faithfully………everytime he comes on…..bippp……switchy…..

  • Rob G in Chicago

    I won’t hold my breath waithing for the MSM to point out that it is the RNC and not the taxpayers paying for Gov. Palin’s wardrobe, and I’m pretty certain that it was offered to her, and was not asked by her. And I certainly won’t hold my breath waiting for the MSM to seek out and report on the same issues as they relate to the Obama campaign, although Whiskey Joe’s wardrobe may have been put on his MBNA credit card.

  • Soldier of Christ

    This constant bashing of the media reminds me when they were for Senior Bush I. They were not so liberal back in the early 90s. Cnn and other network bashed and bashed and bashed Bill Clinton with all the cheating he was doing, his gaffes, his wife’s remarks…blah…blah….the media was on board with the hero Senior Bush. The american people got sick of the media- they got tired of the bashing of a country boy named Clinton- and to tell you the truth they are getting tired of the bashing of a country alaskan girl named Palin. We, the people, I believe will show the media in our votes that we disapprove of their agenda and their tactics. I believe it!

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHjFxJVeCQs dgr

    Total Bias, Total Bull, and Primary Obama Fluffer

  • Revelation

    I heard that Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann wore condoms when they listened to Barack’s convention acceptance speech.

  • hootnannie

    The coastal elites have as much as said “Eff you, and whatta you gonna do about it?” to the rest of us. They’ve got the parties all booked and the drapes measured and ordered. And of course none of the ghetto folk or young O-bot rowdies are invited. Maybe they all can get drunk and pretend that Bobo really won, the same way they’ve been pretending that he WILL. PSSST!! Guess what–WE VOTE!!!!

  • Hope Floats! Flush Twice!

    The entire original cast of Happy Days, except Chachi, have endorsed Obama now. Henry “The Fonze” Winkler had endorsed Obama in the primaries.

    Need a laugh? Watch “Fonzie Jumps the Shark.” It will get rid of the image of KO humping Bambi’s skinny leg.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpraJYnbVtE

blog comments powered by Disqus