Regency, on October 31st, 2008 at 4:22 pm Said:

How many “liberal women” does it take to set feminism back to 1918?

Suprisingly, it only takes one, but they were all too glad to pile on.

—————————————————————————–

I found the above post at another web site but thought I would pass it along.

I don’t do online donations but I see there is a mail in address. I guess if a person sends it next day or second day it would get there on time. After all that has went on during this campaign I am glad I don’t use a card online.

For all his soaring anti-American and anti-capitalist rhetoric, Reverend Wright is doing pretty good for himself with that mansion that the church (and Obama) bought him.

Get the crowd worked up and milk them out of their change- neat trick.

Honestly I wish it was over now am tired of all the polls, the ads, the talk of Obama being the greatest thing since slice bread, just let it be over and done with.

Just reading the blogs, watching the daily track from this poll and that poll, I don’t see how McCain is going to come back, no one wants to give a correct answer FOX themselves seems to be just shooting off numbers so what is the real picture does Mc Cain have a chance in this or not?

Palin rally is drawing great crowds but listening to the media it seems that is just that crowd not votes, I just cant believe that all that was done to Hillary that democrats will put party first and vote for Obama, I also cant believe that the average American would look at all that is in Obama’s past and give him their vote.

I still hope and have faith that good sense will prevail and Mc Cain would win for the sake of the future of this country, but at this point I just cant tell and that is depressing.

Good ad – should have been out months ago. This is not the Republican attack machine of years past.

Nonetheless, I think we have a good chance of winning this thing — Those bitter clinging folks know a fraud when they see one.

These clips are getting the kind of legs Obama clips got a year ago. Close to 700 K in four days. That’s extremely good!

I have said all along that McCain will win in a landslide. Take heart folks and vote!

Businesses are being told to close early to make way for the Great Obama and his splendiferous spectacle of electoral triumph. Allow the masses to descend upon Grant Park unfettered by normal commerce. Let the deliveries be delayed, the meetings postpones, let the workers telecommute. Nothing should stand in the way of the great Messiah arriving on a horse’s ass, with MetRx Chocolate Peanut Bars tossed out to all as levitates by…..

More OT. Shucks. This does sum it up.

I was voting for Barack Obama until… I Googled

Glad the Republicans are finally ready for the showdown!
I have cleaned the basement and garage, waterproofed the deck, finished my Christmas shopping, and am ready to wrap everything this weekend!
Yep, I’m tired and frazzled, and I SO need an early gift…a McCain victory!
Please! And my New Year’s resolution will be NO COMPLAINING every again!

McCain is going to win. This isn’t dinner theater in Scottsdale…it’s the White House. Enough playing around with the psychotic commie rockstar Hitler wannabe. That’s NOT Presidential. McCain is the only way this country wins. And Americans aren’t stupid. Yeah, yeah, there are people like that idiotic woman on the video saying that she won’t have to work or pay her bills anymore if Obama wins. There are going to be people like that voting for OHitler. But he will NEVER be POTUS. Never. MCCAIN/PALIN 08.

USE YOUR BRAIN, VOTE MCCAIN.

VIDEO: Obama calls $1 Trillion tax hike a “small adjustment” by re-defining $97K family income as “upper class”

I found a video clip in which Obama totally redefines what middle/upper class income is and who should pay more taxes. He is quoted on video. I think this is newsworthy, given the current focus on Obama’s plan to tax a larger number of families. The video shows Obama directly stating this. It is far less difficult to interpret than, say, the Chicago NPR audio-only about redistributive change. This is a video that’s ready-made for a campaign spot and for video news releases. All people will understand it.

In this video, Obama defined $97,000 family income as “upper class” and subject to $1 Trillion in tax increases in debate within the last year and in policy proposals. He also makes a similar claim in writing in an Op-Ed (see below).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-SavgJlBLA

The key minute: Watch from 1:15 to 2:15 for Obama’s remarkable claim that $97K family income is “upper class”

Of course there are other videos of this same debate, Nov 2007, Las Vegas from which you can clip these quotes, but this one just puts in the context of Obama/Biden redefining Middle Class income from $250K to $200K to $150K to $97K is “upper class.” and the top group—and subject to big tax hikes.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3638710&page=1

I wonder how many families with 2 or 3 kids in middle class suburbs of our major cities would consider their $97 K income to be “upper class.” If any of those kids plan to go to college, the families will hardly be living like the upper class on $97K.

Obama’s Op-Ed

http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007/09/21/opinion/opinion/doc46f35dac127eb409456532.txt

“… raise the cap on the amount of income subject to the Social Security tax. If we kept the payroll tax rate exactly the same but applied it to all earnings and not just the first $97,500, we could virtually eliminate the entire Social Security shortfall.” – Op-Ed by Barack Obama, Quad City Times, Sep., 2007

Here’s another idea…. I think it will be HUGELY effective… Karl Rove brought up this point the other day.

Obama’s Economic Plan:

Would you rather be guaranteed your job/position with the possibility of growth or, receive a $500/year credit?? You do the math!!!! A vote for Obama is likely a vote to loose your job!!!

It AMAZES me that we in America could even consider
Senator Nobama as a candidate.

It does not take 20 years of attending such
sermons to separate the wheat from the chaff.

BARACK OBAMA FALSIFIED A VARIETY OF GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS IN ORDER OBTAIN SCHOLARSHIPS, STUDENT LOANS, JOB APPLICATIONS, AND FORMS THAT HE SIGNED AS A SENATOR OF THE UNITED STATES BY SAYING THAT HE WAS A NEGRO.

WHEN WILL THE NEWS MEDIA DO IT’S JOB AND INVESTIGATE SOMEONE WHO MIGHT BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS NOT A NEGRO

http://kennethelamb.blogspot.com/2008/02/barak-obama-questions-about-ethnic.html

I researched what follows for a NY daily of international reputation. It wasn’t what I thought I’d find. I documented it, presented it to the Washington Bureau Chief, but was hardly surprised that it never saw ink. As you’ll see for yourself, this is the political equivalent of a nuclear bomb.

I must pause very briefly to note usage of the word Negro in what follows: In all academic studies of race, the proper scientific word for the ethnic composition I discuss is Negro. For any who scream racist at its mention, I say take it up with the scientific community. It’s not my word, it’s theirs. I am using it in its proper scientific context.

Why is the fact that Mr. Obama is only 6.25% African Negro not reported?

Because to acknowledge it is to report this devastating truth about him: Mr. Obama is not legally African-American. It is impossible for him to be, in truth, America’s first African-American president.

Federal law requires that to claim a minority status, you must be at least 1/8 of the descriptor, but for the sake of this article, I’ve converted it to a decimal fraction for easier comprehension. You must be at least 12.5% of the racial component you claim for minority status. Mr. Obama, claiming to be African-American, is half the legal threshold.

Again, to let it sink in: Mr. Obama is not legally African-American. It is impossible for him to be, in truth, America’s first African-American president.

Yet claiming to be African-American is the soul and substance of his claim to fame. It is what he has used throughout his adult life to distinguish himself from other competitors. It is the ethnic identity he proclaims, and it is the ethnic identity he craves. Without it, he is just another mixed race Caucasian Arab with an African influence playing on his skin’s pigmentation.

But no matter what he craves, no matter what he has used to propel himself through life, no matter the racist presumption of seeing his skin and without question calling him black, the hard, cold, genetically inarguable reality remains: he is not an African-American.

Mr. Obama is 50% Caucasian, that from his mother. What those who want Mr. Obama to write history by becoming “America’s first African-American president” ignore is that his father was ethnically Arabic, with only 1 relative ethnically African Negro – a maternal great-grandparent (Sen. Obama’s great-great grandparent, thus the 6.25% ethnic contribution to the senator’s ethnic composition.).

That means that Mr. Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother’s side. He is 43.75% Arabic, and 6.25% African Negro from his father’s side.

Put another way, his father could honestly claim African-American ethnic classification. He was the last generation able to do so.

Sen. Obama could honestly say, “My father was African-American.” Racist presumptions led an Ivy League admissions committee, and lazy “newspapers of record” factcheckers, to presume that if his father is African-American, then Sen. Obama must be African-American also.

But it doesn’t work that way. Racist presumptions coupled with sloppy vetting don’t turn a lie into the truth.

Sen. Obama is one generation too far removed from the ethnic African Negro input to make the same claim as his father, Harvard’s Admission’s stamp of approval notwithstanding.

As you can see for yourself, Sen. Obama’s African-American ethnic claim, when properly researched and documented, is a lie.

The question no one wants to answer – particularly Mr. Obama and his supporters, is, “Why do you think he has an Arabic name? Why does his father have an Arabic name? Why does every ancestor on his father’s side have an Arabic name?”

The answer is obvious: They have Arabic names because his father’s side of the family tree is Arabic.

Need proof? Research the Kenyan records for yourself. You will find that his father was officially classified as “Arab African” by the Kenyan government.

But in America’s current political climate, that truth is heresy; that truth is “an inconvenient truth.” It is the political equivalent in our time to what Galileo’s scientific pronouncements were in his time: it is true, but nobody wants to know the truth because the lie is so much more comforting.

That is why detractors of this truth will do everything to denounce it, except submit to the discipline of actually researching it.

There’s a reason for that: it proves he is not sufficiently Negro to earn classification under American law as an African-American.

For Sen. Obama, telling the truth means he will give up all the accolades about being the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, an accolade that relies on a sleight-of-hand in job titling that changed the name of the top job from Editor to President.

If stated in its absolute truth, Mr. Obama was the second person of color to run the Review. He was beat to the Review’s top spot by a true African-American about 60 years before Mr. Obama showed up for classes.

Again, a very inconvenient truth.

That is devastating in itself. The further effect is that Mr. Obama would have to convince Americans still reeling from 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq, that now is the time for America’s first Arab-American president.

We all know what chance that has of succeeding.

Of course, that would only happen if Mr. Obama told the truth about his racial composition. To tell the truth means Mr. Obama will have to admit that which he has never been forced to admit before, even in the face of the massive lies of his autobiography: Mr. Obama’s entire projection of who he is, and what he is, is a lie.

Mr. Obama would have to say to the world: “I am not what I’ve told you I am. I lied to you in my autobiography when I told you I am black. I lied to the Admission Committee at Harvard so I could get in. I lied to my constituents in Chicago so I could get elected to the State Senate. I lied to my constituents in Illinois so I could get elected to the US Senate. I lied to my supporters across America so I could be President.

“I have lied all during my life to play the race card, and use it, cynically, to advance myself by playing upon the racist presumption of Americans to accept, without question, that anyone of color is African-American. I lied to you, and you blindly accepted it, because of your own racist presumptions about color, and ethnic identity. I looked African-American, and your racist presumptions told you to believe it.”

Even as you read this, the overwhelming majority of you will continue to believe it. Even as you know the truth, you will block the truth out of your mind, because you are bred to accept the racist presumption of color, and ethnic identity.

And so many of you reading this will create incredible mental gymnastics, telling yourself why the truth doesn’t matter. You will lie to yourself because you want to believe the lie, and then curse the American body politic for being built on lies.

You will do this all while failing to tell yourself the truth that it is your lies, as much as any other lies, that are killing the body. You will commit the very action that you curse as the cause of America’s demise, because you are jaded beyond recognizing in yourself the very same disease you so freely condemn in others.

Here is the truth about Mr. Obama’s name, and his father’s ancestors:

True Negro tribal members of western Kenya where his father was born have Christian names, not Arabic. His father’s decision to name him with an Arabic name is a matter of his father establishing his ethnic identity in Africa – it is done deliberately to separate him from the African tribes. He may live among them, but he is not one of them. His father’s message is that he is Arabic, not Negro.

Many will find these truths unsettling. I’m often asked, “But I thought his father was Kenyan. How could Mr. Obama not be African-American, how could his ethnic composition be so Arabic?”

The definitive clue to that answer is to look at his name, his father’s name, and the names of all his ancestors on his father’s side. They are all Arabic.

Researching his roots reveal that on his father’s side, he is descended from Arab slave traders. They operated under an extended grant from Queen Victoria, who gave them the right to continue the slave trade in exchange for helping the British defeat the Madhi Army in southern Sudan and the Upper Nile region. Funny how circular is history; now the British again face the Madhi Army, albeit this time Shiite, not Sunni, as in nineteenth century Sudan.

But telling America’s black community that while their ancestors were breaking the shackles of slavery, Mr. Obama’s ancestors were placing those shackles upon their wrists would hardly play as an Oprah Winfrey best-seller.

Being the son of a poor Kenyan goat-herder plays much better than being the son of a highly placed Arab-African who operated at the top of the Kenyan government following his education at Columbia. You see, even the way he portrays his father is a lie.

We need to linger for a moment on Ms. Winfrey, and her support for Mr. Obama. A very serious problem arises with Ms. Winfrey because of her double-standards: Does everyone remember how she went ballistic when a person whose book she endorsed turned out to be dishonest about what he said about his life in his book?

Of course you do. She pulled the plug on him and forced him into a highly publicized “Mea Culpa” of near groveling for her forgiveness. She publicly humiliated him, and would actually twist-up into contorted faces, visibly hot with anger.

Why then does Ms. Winfrey operate with a double standard for Mr. Obama? She knows his so-called autobiography is replete with “composites” – an Orwellian word for fictional characters that never existed but in Mr. Obama’s imagination, even though he addresses them in his autobiography as if they are real people. They aren’t; they are lies.

So are his timelines, chopped up and rearranged for Mr. Obama’s aggrandizement. And there are the complete lies about events he said specifically impacted his life – events that never occurred despite his writing that they did. They too are lies.

As I said, don’t take my word for it; read Mr. Cohen’s columns in the Washington Post for the details.

Why then does she not hold him to the same standards she held another author?

She doesn’t say, but the possibility that the reason is race-based is fair to ask. What Mr. Obama did is far beyond what the other author did. Why then, public humiliation for one, but campaign whistle-stops for the other?

Ms. Winfrey needs to tell us why. Her integrity is on the line.

Mr. Obama has struggled all his life trying to prove that he is black enough to be called black.

The truth is that if Mr. Obama is elected, his primary ethnic composition is Caucasian, but of course, that carries no cachet.

So if we look at his next predominant ethnic component, Mr. Obama would be America’s first Arab-American president. The truth is that his name says it all.

What amazes me more than anything else about Mr. Obama’s heritage is the unwillingness of anyone in the journalism profession to want to know the truth. While all this is easily documentable, it is so radioactive that no one wants to be on the receiving end of the racist charges that will bombard whoever broaches the truth.

It is another example of how America’s political system is further degenerating into fairy tales and lies. Torpedo boat attacks in Viet Nam, WMD’s in Iraq, Sen. Obama is African-American; we shamelessly lie to ourselves to rationalize whatever we want to believe.

But I wrote this tonight because I’m tired of reading about “integrity” written by those who have none themselves. They know Mr. Obama’s autobiography is filled with lies from start to finish, they know he lies about what his operatives do (the Apple advertisement knock-off against Hills immediately comes to mind), and for those who circulated my research, they know he is not legally black.

But for those longing for Camelot, for those who feel a good story trumps the truth, for those who are so jaded about others that they now live as those they profess to hate, for those who are terrorized by the racist attacks these truths bring, the integrity of Sen. Obama doesn’t matter.

Because their own integrity doesn’t matter to them either.

Why am I writing this? Maybe I just want a clear conscience, clear that the research I did didn’t get buried because the people who received it are afraid to tell the truth in the face of Sen. Obama’s frenzied celebrity status. I’ve been in the business since 1972 – 35 years – writing and researching for people like the NY Times, the Miami Herald, the St. Petersburg Times, The Jewish Information Network, so I know what it’s like on the newsroom floor right now. Nobody can dare speak against Sen. Obama without generating at least a flickering flame of doubt about his or her own sanity – not to mention the knee-jerk reaction that questioning him is indicative of some deep, dark, racist agenda spurring those questions on.

And truth? I ask as Pilate asked, “What is truth?” Who cares about truth? This is history; this is the first time ever in America – why let truth get in the way of chronicling history? (. . . I wrote facetiously.)

Maybe I just want to know that if he gets the presidency, he will get it honestly – if this is general knowledge, and he overcomes it. Maybe I’m just tired of presidents who lie to us; and in this case, I already know Mr. Obama will lie to us, just as he lied in his autobiography, and on so many other occasions documented by Mr. Cohen, by Michael Dobbs, the Washington Post’s factchecker, and so many others.

And maybe I’m tired of us lying to ourselves. Mr. Obama is what we’ve lied ourselves into believing he is.

Maybe by saying that I know he lied, and saying that we lied to ourselves, I will say after he is elected that nobody has any right to complain about him lying after he takes the oath of office, when everybody knew he lied about so many other things – when we lied to ourselves about so many other things, so very long before that.
-30-

it is because of group like this , that the hate in the US is so pronounced. i was a Mccain supporter but thanks to this kind of crap that is old stuff, i will now vote for Obama. you are turning off a lot of voters,

The ads and your bloggers are the true anti-Americans. You can’t broadcast a positive message so you resort to smears. I don’t believe this is the way people should be educated about policies and approach of candidates. But maybe you don’t want people to be truly educated.

What Sherman said — except I already voted for Obama!!!

Good Night Ladies. The champagne is chilling. Obama is set to win by a landslide.The messages of hate and division isn’t going to resonate this time. It’s all about hope and the promise that this county is made up of people who want more from themselves and their country. I think a lot of Republicans will cross over, I did. I had enough of the hate. I want this country to be the shining city on the hill, the land of opportunity, where anything can happen when you work hard, have hope and are determined to succeed. That was Obama’s whole campaign. So feel free to step on over and join us. You’re more than welcome.

The keating five of which John McCain is a historical part of is a scarer thing than pastor wright. People like Sarah palin and John McCain with limited intelligence should never get close to the white house or any seat of power. Particularly, since your support is race based. You cannot believe that a man who finished at the very bottom of his class can out perform one who finished first at Harvard.

Yeah…fuck you guys.

Timothy Mcveigh was once in the military too. But hey, a nut is a nut.

They build modest houses mansions for the poor Wright, does that count?

Umm, umm Obama only won red state causes and a few small blue states. If it was winner take all like the republican party then Obama would have been toast early on. With or without ACORN illegal activities.

Umm, umm one other thing he lost ALL the big states Like CA, PA, NY, MA, you know where a lot of Hillary democrats live. Close to 40$ are VOTING McCAIN. Image that – ummm.

blah-blah

Talking about yourself again?

Obama didn’t win the in the swing states that Democrats need to win the general election. He jobbed the caucuses and the rest is history.