<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Harry Too (+ Open Thread)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivardo</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-40419</link>
		<dc:creator>vivardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-40419</guid>
		<description>oubodomoupas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oubodomoupas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drmyi</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14117</link>
		<dc:creator>drmyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 23:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14117</guid>
		<description>Opening post&gt; Wayne Madsen of waynemadsenreports are the fraudes and the Hugh Hewett&#039;s of the left and on a level with Alex Jones of the far removed and confused.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opening post&gt; Wayne Madsen of waynemadsenreports are the fraudes and the Hugh Hewett&#8217;s of the left and on a level with Alex Jones of the far removed and confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpumpky</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14116</link>
		<dc:creator>mpumpky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 20:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14116</guid>
		<description>I believe I stand corrected, thank you.  I might have confused the statement about the white paper, or something like that, but I thought he did apologize... for all it would do after the fact anyways...  I do think I remember something about the Mi lai incident too, but will have to go back to check some files...  some were lost when one of several crashed, when they got overloaded... might have it someplace in back up, or caqn google, i GUESS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I stand corrected, thank you.  I might have confused the statement about the white paper, or something like that, but I thought he did apologize&#8230; for all it would do after the fact anyways&#8230;  I do think I remember something about the Mi lai incident too, but will have to go back to check some files&#8230;  some were lost when one of several crashed, when they got overloaded&#8230; might have it someplace in back up, or caqn google, i GUESS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14115</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 20:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14115</guid>
		<description>RE: Powell

Powell said that a white paper regarding UBL and 9/11 would be publicized.

That never materialized.

Am I right or am I right?

See:

Interview on Meet the Press
Secretary Colin L. Powell
Washington, DC
September 23, 2001

QUESTION:  Will you release publicly a white paper, which links him and his organization to this attack, to put people at ease?

SECRETARY POWELL:  [snip]
And I think, in the near future, we will be able to put out a paper, a document, that will describe quite clearly the evidence that we have linking him to this attack. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/5012.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/5012.htm&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Powell</p>
<p>Powell said that a white paper regarding UBL and 9/11 would be publicized.</p>
<p>That never materialized.</p>
<p>Am I right or am I right?</p>
<p>See:</p>
<p>Interview on Meet the Press<br />
Secretary Colin L. Powell<br />
Washington, DC<br />
September 23, 2001</p>
<p>QUESTION:  Will you release publicly a white paper, which links him and his organization to this attack, to put people at ease?</p>
<p>SECRETARY POWELL:  [snip]<br />
And I think, in the near future, we will be able to put out a paper, a document, that will describe quite clearly the evidence that we have linking him to this attack. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/5012.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2001/5012.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14114</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14114</guid>
		<description>Chris, PrchrLady,

I don&#039;t recall Powell&#039;s resignation having anything whatever to do with honour, and I don&#039;t remember hearing him take a scintilla of responsibility for anything at all. All I can recall is a lot of whining about him being the innocent victim who was deceived into making all those statements, and anyway he still thinks attacking Iraq was the right thing to do and America should stay the course. The guy is a whining, dishonourable loser. 

And he never did have any honour. I seem to recall that he was involved in the My Lai coverup, so why so many people have been shocked - SHOCKED! - at his failure to be stand up over Iraq is beyond me. Once a cowardly whining weasel, always a cowardly whining weasel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, PrchrLady,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall Powell&#8217;s resignation having anything whatever to do with honour, and I don&#8217;t remember hearing him take a scintilla of responsibility for anything at all. All I can recall is a lot of whining about him being the innocent victim who was deceived into making all those statements, and anyway he still thinks attacking Iraq was the right thing to do and America should stay the course. The guy is a whining, dishonourable loser. </p>
<p>And he never did have any honour. I seem to recall that he was involved in the My Lai coverup, so why so many people have been shocked &#8211; SHOCKED! &#8211; at his failure to be stand up over Iraq is beyond me. Once a cowardly whining weasel, always a cowardly whining weasel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vosburg</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14113</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vosburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14113</guid>
		<description>Prchr Lady writes: &quot;I do give him some credit however, in that he came forward soon (not soon enought tho) and told the truth. And resigned.&quot;

I recall the resignation all right, but I seem to have missed the mea culpa. When was this? Did he issue a statement of some sort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prchr Lady writes: &#8220;I do give him some credit however, in that he came forward soon (not soon enought tho) and told the truth. And resigned.&#8221;</p>
<p>I recall the resignation all right, but I seem to have missed the mea culpa. When was this? Did he issue a statement of some sort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrchrLady</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14112</link>
		<dc:creator>PrchrLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 14:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14112</guid>
		<description>&#039;Does anyone think that Tenet or Condi will testify under Oath&quot;---  I am beginning to have my doubts.  i thought I heard on one of the synopsis videos that Gonzo wasn&#039;t under oath the other day.  Does anyone know if that is true?

If Waxman can get them under oath, and hit them hard, we might have a chance to save what they have not yet destroyed of our constitution and government.  I can&#039;t seem to see and end to any of this, unless we Impeach them all.

Chris, like you, I gave Powell the benefit of the doubt, at least initially, because of his strong military background.  However, he was wrong from the moment he uttered those false words.  I do give him some credit however, in that he came forward soon (not soon enought tho) and told the truth.  And resigned.  An honorable act there, and should serve as a role model for the rest of the PNAC and WHIG members who continue to run our country into the ground...

And I still hope they all rot in hell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Does anyone think that Tenet or Condi will testify under Oath&#8221;&#8212;  I am beginning to have my doubts.  i thought I heard on one of the synopsis videos that Gonzo wasn&#8217;t under oath the other day.  Does anyone know if that is true?</p>
<p>If Waxman can get them under oath, and hit them hard, we might have a chance to save what they have not yet destroyed of our constitution and government.  I can&#8217;t seem to see and end to any of this, unless we Impeach them all.</p>
<p>Chris, like you, I gave Powell the benefit of the doubt, at least initially, because of his strong military background.  However, he was wrong from the moment he uttered those false words.  I do give him some credit however, in that he came forward soon (not soon enought tho) and told the truth.  And resigned.  An honorable act there, and should serve as a role model for the rest of the PNAC and WHIG members who continue to run our country into the ground&#8230;</p>
<p>And I still hope they all rot in hell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Vosburg</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14111</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Vosburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 12:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14111</guid>
		<description>Shirin: &quot;It was based partly on that information that I concluded that without question Powell was lying.&quot;

Well, that and the several other easily debunked lies, so no argument here.

I didn&#039;t get a chance to see the presentation until the following weekend, so it was only after reading the MSM&#039;s glowing reports of the presentation that my jaw-- and respect for Powell-- dropped lower, and lower, and lower as I watched.

I actually started laughing when he got to the allegation of mobile chemical weapon labs and buttressed his claim with an &quot;artist&#039;s conception&quot; of what such a vehicle might look like.

&quot;Good lord, what is this, one of Wile E. Coyote&#039;s blueprints?&quot; I recall wondering, and started hunting for an anvil to drop on the TV.

Powell saw himself, more than anything else, as a loyal soldier, and I suppose he gulled himself into believing that it was his duty to lie in service to his country. 

Sadly, he neglected a higher duty to the truth, and he&#039;s as culpable as the President himself for this obscenity. I&#039;m long past wishing that any of them rot in hell, but it remains absolutely necessary, for the continued health of this country, that they be brought to book for what they have done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shirin: &#8220;It was based partly on that information that I concluded that without question Powell was lying.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that and the several other easily debunked lies, so no argument here.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t get a chance to see the presentation until the following weekend, so it was only after reading the MSM&#8217;s glowing reports of the presentation that my jaw&#8211; and respect for Powell&#8211; dropped lower, and lower, and lower as I watched.</p>
<p>I actually started laughing when he got to the allegation of mobile chemical weapon labs and buttressed his claim with an &#8220;artist&#8217;s conception&#8221; of what such a vehicle might look like.</p>
<p>&#8220;Good lord, what is this, one of Wile E. Coyote&#8217;s blueprints?&#8221; I recall wondering, and started hunting for an anvil to drop on the TV.</p>
<p>Powell saw himself, more than anything else, as a loyal soldier, and I suppose he gulled himself into believing that it was his duty to lie in service to his country. </p>
<p>Sadly, he neglected a higher duty to the truth, and he&#8217;s as culpable as the President himself for this obscenity. I&#8217;m long past wishing that any of them rot in hell, but it remains absolutely necessary, for the continued health of this country, that they be brought to book for what they have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14110</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 09:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14110</guid>
		<description>Chris, 
Condi and the rest of the WHIG group continue to spin the propaganda that&quot;all...or 7 other intelligence agencies thought Iraq had WMDs too&quot;. This has been effective  as a silly excuse for her own errors.But...is it true. Where has that been published except out of the mouths of lying neocons. Other agencies might have &quot;suspected &quot; there were chemical an/or biological weapons, but none &quot;knew&quot;. I wager the whole set of memes are false anyways.

HOWEVER....it is clear that NO country but the US and the neocons stated that Iraq....without even a nuclear institution anywhere(Iran has obvious and huge labs), with their previously purchased yellow-cake under UN seal and unuseable, had an&quot;ongoing nuclear program&quot; as Cheney and Condi...and all of the principles lied to us.

Aluminum tubes???utter bullsh..t, and it was pointed out  at the time, but not publicized by the complicit MSM.

Does anyone think Condi or Tenet will testify under oath in front of Waxman. Ohhhh what a sight that would be. Only a little better than Val Plame&#039;s testimony, but not the feast that Rove and Miers would provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
Condi and the rest of the WHIG group continue to spin the propaganda that&#8221;all&#8230;or 7 other intelligence agencies thought Iraq had WMDs too&#8221;. This has been effective  as a silly excuse for her own errors.But&#8230;is it true. Where has that been published except out of the mouths of lying neocons. Other agencies might have &#8220;suspected &#8221; there were chemical an/or biological weapons, but none &#8220;knew&#8221;. I wager the whole set of memes are false anyways.</p>
<p>HOWEVER&#8230;.it is clear that NO country but the US and the neocons stated that Iraq&#8230;.without even a nuclear institution anywhere(Iran has obvious and huge labs), with their previously purchased yellow-cake under UN seal and unuseable, had an&#8221;ongoing nuclear program&#8221; as Cheney and Condi&#8230;and all of the principles lied to us.</p>
<p>Aluminum tubes???utter bullsh..t, and it was pointed out  at the time, but not publicized by the complicit MSM.</p>
<p>Does anyone think Condi or Tenet will testify under oath in front of Waxman. Ohhhh what a sight that would be. Only a little better than Val Plame&#8217;s testimony, but not the feast that Rove and Miers would provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14109</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 08:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14109</guid>
		<description>Al-Dawa: Now and Then

NOW: Cheney in Saudi Arabia Seeking Iraq Help

Abdullah also has signaled that he sees al-Maliki as a weak leader with too many ties to pro-Iranian Shiite parties to be effective in reaching out to Iraqi&#039;s Sunni minority.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2007/05/13/ap/washington/d8p3ar3o0.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2007/05/13/ap/washington/d8p3ar3o0.txt&lt;/a&gt;



THEN: Message From Iran Triggered Bombing Spree In Kuwait, The Washington Post, February 3, 1984

Al Dawa, for example, is no household name in the United States.

But it is a name important to this story.

It leads us back to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the ruling figure in Iran; to Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, the militant Lebanese Shiite leader who has been implicated--despite his denials--in the Marine and French bombings in Beirut; to Hussein Musawi, Fadlallah&#039;s strong-arm lieutenant; to the Hakim brothers in Iran and their connections to the Middle East terrorism industry.

THEN: 10 Pro-Iranian Shiites Held in Kuwait Bombings, The Washington Post December 19, 1983

Kuwait announced yesterday the arrest of 10 Shiite Moslems with ties to Iran in terrorist bombings that killed four people and wounded 66 last Monday at the U.S. Embassy and other targets.

&quot;All 10 have admitted involvement in the incidents as well as participating in planning the blasts,&quot; Abdul Aziz Hussein, minister of state for Cabinet affairs, told reporters after a Cabinet session, United Press International reported.

Hussein said the seven Iraqis and three Lebanese were members of the Al Dawa party, a radical Iraqi Shiite Moslem group with close ties to Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al-Dawa: Now and Then</p>
<p>NOW: Cheney in Saudi Arabia Seeking Iraq Help</p>
<p>Abdullah also has signaled that he sees al-Maliki as a weak leader with too many ties to pro-Iranian Shiite parties to be effective in reaching out to Iraqi&#8217;s Sunni minority.  <a href="http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2007/05/13/ap/washington/d8p3ar3o0.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2007/05/13/ap/washington/d8p3ar3o0.txt</a></p>
<p>THEN: Message From Iran Triggered Bombing Spree In Kuwait, The Washington Post, February 3, 1984</p>
<p>Al Dawa, for example, is no household name in the United States.</p>
<p>But it is a name important to this story.</p>
<p>It leads us back to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the ruling figure in Iran; to Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, the militant Lebanese Shiite leader who has been implicated&#8211;despite his denials&#8211;in the Marine and French bombings in Beirut; to Hussein Musawi, Fadlallah&#8217;s strong-arm lieutenant; to the Hakim brothers in Iran and their connections to the Middle East terrorism industry.</p>
<p>THEN: 10 Pro-Iranian Shiites Held in Kuwait Bombings, The Washington Post December 19, 1983</p>
<p>Kuwait announced yesterday the arrest of 10 Shiite Moslems with ties to Iran in terrorist bombings that killed four people and wounded 66 last Monday at the U.S. Embassy and other targets.</p>
<p>&#8220;All 10 have admitted involvement in the incidents as well as participating in planning the blasts,&#8221; Abdul Aziz Hussein, minister of state for Cabinet affairs, told reporters after a Cabinet session, United Press International reported.</p>
<p>Hussein said the seven Iraqis and three Lebanese were members of the Al Dawa party, a radical Iraqi Shiite Moslem group with close ties to Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14108</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 08:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14108</guid>
		<description>Iraqis resist U.S. pressure to enact oil law

It has not even reached parliament, but the oil law that U.S. officials call vital to ending Iraq&#039;s civil war is in serious trouble among Iraqi lawmakers, many of whom see it as a sloppy document rushed forward to satisfy Washington&#039;s clock.

[snip]

The problems of the oil bill bode poorly for the other so-called benchmarks that the Bush administration has been pressuring Prime Minister Nouri Maliki&#039;s government to meet. Those include provincial elections, reversing a prohibition against former Baath Party members holding government and military positions and revision of Iraq&#039;s constitution.

[snip]

But Iraqi lawmakers show little sign of bending to accommodate Bush on an issue as crucial as oil.

[snip]

The objections are as vast and technical as the measure itself and reflect the wider problems facing Iraq: regional distrust of the Shiite-led central government; wariness of foreign interest; and anger toward the United States, which many Iraqis believe invaded Iraq solely to get its hands on the oil. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-oil13may13,1,755681.story?track=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-oil13may13,1,755681.story?track=rss&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iraqis resist U.S. pressure to enact oil law</p>
<p>It has not even reached parliament, but the oil law that U.S. officials call vital to ending Iraq&#8217;s civil war is in serious trouble among Iraqi lawmakers, many of whom see it as a sloppy document rushed forward to satisfy Washington&#8217;s clock.</p>
<p>[snip]</p>
<p>The problems of the oil bill bode poorly for the other so-called benchmarks that the Bush administration has been pressuring Prime Minister Nouri Maliki&#8217;s government to meet. Those include provincial elections, reversing a prohibition against former Baath Party members holding government and military positions and revision of Iraq&#8217;s constitution.</p>
<p>[snip]</p>
<p>But Iraqi lawmakers show little sign of bending to accommodate Bush on an issue as crucial as oil.</p>
<p>[snip]</p>
<p>The objections are as vast and technical as the measure itself and reflect the wider problems facing Iraq: regional distrust of the Shiite-led central government; wariness of foreign interest; and anger toward the United States, which many Iraqis believe invaded Iraq solely to get its hands on the oil. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-oil13may13,1,755681.story?track=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-oil13may13,1,755681.story?track=rss</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consul-At-Arms</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14107</link>
		<dc:creator>Consul-At-Arms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 23:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve linked to you here:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2007/05/re-were-harry-too-open-thread.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2007/05/re-were-harry-too-open-thread.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve linked to you here:  <a href="http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2007/05/re-were-harry-too-open-thread.html" rel="nofollow">http://consul-at-arms.blogspot.com/2007/05/re-were-harry-too-open-thread.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14106</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 22:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14106</guid>
		<description>I wonder what Harry&#039;s mom would be thinking and feeling about him taking part in this odious so-called war if she were alive. I have a hunch she is spinning in her grave right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Harry&#8217;s mom would be thinking and feeling about him taking part in this odious so-called war if she were alive. I have a hunch she is spinning in her grave right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrchrLady</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14105</link>
		<dc:creator>PrchrLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 22:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14105</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I think that Harry has a lot of spunk, willing to serve despite the fact that he no doubt could have gotten a &#039;school&#039; deferment or somesuch...  I am sure his comrades in arms are proud to serve with him, and by the show of their solidarity so early on, I know he has not asked him for it, but deserves it.  Too bad we couldn&#039;t send the bush girls off with that team... might learn more from them than from daddy and mommy dearest...

I rant on...

Too all the mothers out there, I wish you my best.  May the love you show to others as either a Mother, a Daughter, a Sister, be returned to you a thousand times...  To those special women in our military, my heart is especially heavy for you if you are separated from those you love at this special time.  May God&#039;s Light shine on you and protect you until you return to those you love, and love you.

I want to thank you Susan, esp for the articles on food contamination, both in our pet as well as food supply itself.  It is indeed scary, and the more I read and study about it, the more angry I am becoming...  

So very much these days it seems I am angry about... I diverse...  anyway, I found a great new website, new to me at least, with a bunch of great videos most two to 3 minutes...  here is a link, hope some others will try going green a bit more.  if everyone starts doing a little something more each day, we might still save the environment, and perhaps the world...  it has lots of info.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sundancechannel.com/greenguide&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sundancechannel.com/greenguide&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I think that Harry has a lot of spunk, willing to serve despite the fact that he no doubt could have gotten a &#8216;school&#8217; deferment or somesuch&#8230;  I am sure his comrades in arms are proud to serve with him, and by the show of their solidarity so early on, I know he has not asked him for it, but deserves it.  Too bad we couldn&#8217;t send the bush girls off with that team&#8230; might learn more from them than from daddy and mommy dearest&#8230;</p>
<p>I rant on&#8230;</p>
<p>Too all the mothers out there, I wish you my best.  May the love you show to others as either a Mother, a Daughter, a Sister, be returned to you a thousand times&#8230;  To those special women in our military, my heart is especially heavy for you if you are separated from those you love at this special time.  May God&#8217;s Light shine on you and protect you until you return to those you love, and love you.</p>
<p>I want to thank you Susan, esp for the articles on food contamination, both in our pet as well as food supply itself.  It is indeed scary, and the more I read and study about it, the more angry I am becoming&#8230;  </p>
<p>So very much these days it seems I am angry about&#8230; I diverse&#8230;  anyway, I found a great new website, new to me at least, with a bunch of great videos most two to 3 minutes&#8230;  here is a link, hope some others will try going green a bit more.  if everyone starts doing a little something more each day, we might still save the environment, and perhaps the world&#8230;  it has lots of info.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sundancechannel.com/greenguide" rel="nofollow">http://www.sundancechannel.com/greenguide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirin</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/582/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14104</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 22:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/05/12/were-harry-too-open-thread/#comment-14104</guid>
		<description>Chris, what I was told could be wrong, of course, but I was told, and also read from quite a credible source that Powell&#039;s own nuclear experts did tell him that the tubes were inappropriate, and that one of the reasons they were inappropriate is because they were made from anodized metal. It was based partly on that information that I concluded that without question Powell was lying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, what I was told could be wrong, of course, but I was told, and also read from quite a credible source that Powell&#8217;s own nuclear experts did tell him that the tubes were inappropriate, and that one of the reasons they were inappropriate is because they were made from anodized metal. It was based partly on that information that I concluded that without question Powell was lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

