The operation was at this time effectively unknown to President Barack Obama or Valerie Jarrett and it remained that way until AFTER it had already been initiated. President Obama was literally pulled from a golf outing and escorted back to the White House to be informed of the mission. Upon his arrival there was a briefing held which included Bill Daley, John Brennan, and a high ranking member of the military. When Obama emerged from the briefing, he was described as looking “very confused and uncertain.” The president was then placed in the situation room where several of the players in this event had already been watching the operation unfold.” So says the White House Insider as told to Ulsterman (H/T to NQ regular, Noogan, for linking to the initial report after bin Laden’s killing). Can one say, “Deep Throat”?

Wow. I am not surprised by this news, though, in all honesty. The photo released by the White House as the Powers-That-Be watched the mission unfold (or at least some of it), made that abundantly clear:

From the get-go, it looked to me like Obama was sitting in the “Kid’s Chair,” while the adults were around the big table. If the White House Insider is accurate, and Larry Johnson is now stating after intel he’s received that the insider is at least 80% accurate, that’s exactly what was going on here. The decision had been made, and not by Obama. As the Insider stated in a previous interview, it was a coup, a term the insider stands by in the update on May 3, 2011 to SocyBerty.

Make no mistake – this is huge. Huge.

So, who did give the order to go after Osama bin Laden? It was Leon Panetta, backed by Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. Not Barack Obama, despite his taking credit for it (though that is not a surprise, either – that has been his MO for years and years). If you have not had your fill of Obama BS, just watch his “60 Minutes” interview in which he blathers on and on about his “plan.” As you will read below, there was no such plan, at least not from him.

There is so much to this interview, and I urge you to read the complete post, but here are some key components:

Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president. (Emphasis mine.)

I mentioned above who was doing the overruling – a star-studded group if ever there was one (well, except for maybe Jim Clapper – you remember him – the Director Of Intelligence who seemed woefully ignorant of Intelligence, who claimed the Muslim Brotherhood was “largely secular.” Yes, that guy.). Anyway, it was this group against Valerie Jarrett, and her puppet, Obama:

I was correct in stating there had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama. Obama would meet with various components of the pro-invasion faction, almost always with Jarrett present, and then often fail to indicate his position. This situation continued for some time, though the division between Jarrett/Obama and the rest intensified more recently, most notably from Hillary Clinton. She was livid over the president’s failure to act, and her office began a campaign of anonymous leaks to the media indicating such. As for Jarrett, her concern rested on two primary fronts. One, that the military action could fail and harm the president’s already weakened standing with both the American public and the world. Second, that the attack would be viewed as an act of aggression against Muslims, and further destabilize conditions in the Middle East.

Wow. Yes, those should be our primary concerns when it comes to National Security, would it make Obama look bad, and angering Muslims? Good grief. That does confirm what many of us have thought, though. Our National Security has been couched by how it will appear to Muslims around the world, not about what is best for the United States of America. There is something seriously, seriously wrong with that.

The interviewer then asked about how they got Obama to change his opinion, to which the insider said they didn’t – Obama didn’t HAVE an opinion. The complete response is too long to include here, but the term “masterful manipulation” was used to describe how Leon Panetta made this happen. Here is just part of the response by the Insider:

[snip] Basically, the whole damn operation was already ready to go – including the specific team support Intel necessary to engage the enemy within hours of being given notice. Panetta then made plans to proceed with an on-ground assault. This information reached either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates first (likely via military contacts directly associated with the impending mission) who then informed the other. Those two then met with Panetta, who informed each of them he had been given the authority by the president to proceed with a mission if the opportunity presented itself. Both Gates and Clinton warned Panetta of the implications of that authority – namely he was possibly being made into a scapegoat. Panetta admitted that possibility, but felt the opportunity to get Bin Laden outweighed that risk. During that meeting, Hillary Clinton was first to pledge her full support for Panetta, indicating she would defend him if necessary. Similar support was then followed by Gates. The following day, and with Panetta’s permission, Clinton met in private with Bill Daley and urged him to get the president’s full and open approval of the Panetta plan. Daley agreed such approval would be of great benefit to the action, and instructed Clinton to delay proceeding until he had secured that approval. Daley contacted Clinton within hours of their meeting indicating Jarrett refused to allow the president to give that approval (emphasis mine). Daley then informed Clinton that he too would fully support Panetta in his actions, even if it meant disclosing the president’s indecision to the American public should that action fail to produce a successful conclusion. Clinton took that message back to Panetta and the CIA director initiated the 48 hour engagement order. At this point, the President of the United States was not informed of the engagement order – it did not originate from him, and for several hours after the order had been given and the special ops forces were preparing for action into Pakistan from their position in Afghanistan, Daley successfully kept Obama and Jarrett insulated from that order. [snip] (Click here to read the rest.)

At this point, you may be wondering just who Valerie Jarrett is, and why she has so much influence over Obama, more so than a number of top Cabinet officials. Well, she is the Senior Advisor to the President now, but prior to that worked for Mayor Richard Daley, and hired Michelle Obama as an assistant to the mayor. Oh, but get this – only after “…re-assuring Michelle’s fiancé, Barack Obama, that the job was right for her.” Gee, sexist much?

Anyway, here are some of the ways in which she has been described:

Chicago businesswoman Valerie Jarrett has earned all sorts of nicknames as an aide to President-elect Barack Obama — from “First Friend” to “big sister” to “the other half of Obama’s brain.” As co-chair of his transition team, Jarrett has spent the past week denying rumors, parsing policy changes and insisting that she doesn’t know where she’ll end up in the new administration (although Beltway gossip suggests she may be appointed to Obama’s seat in the Senate). Of her relationship with the 44th commander-in-chief, Jarrett says simply: “He is my dear friend. I would do anything the President of the United States asked me to do.” [snip] (Click here to read the rest.)

And apparently, she has a tremendous amount of sway over Obama in terms of policy, foreign and national. That is quite something for someone who was not elected, or had to pass Congressional scrutiny.

But that is not all there is to Valerie Jarrett (or Michelle Obama). There is more that is not so glowing:

[snip]But not a word about Jarrett’s involvement in Michelle Obama’s patient-dumping scheme at the University of Chicago Medical Center, where Jarrett sat of the board of directors.

And not a word about Jarrett’s involvement in Grove Parc — the Chicago slum complex managed by Jarrett’s company, Habitat, Inc. To this day, Jarrett refuses to answer questions about the dilapidated housing development. [snip](Click here to read the rest.)

Yeah, she’s a piece of work, the embodiment of a Chicago-style politics. But she also is someone who has WAY too much power in the White House, and way too much power over affairs of State.

Again, if only 80% of what the White House Insider says is true, this is damaging stuff, indeed. It explains a lot, though, including Obama’s look while sitting in the Kiddy chair while the mission unfolded, and how fortunate we are that there are actual grown ups in this Administration willing to stick their necks out to protect our nation. One thing is for sure – that does not include Obama or Valerie Jarrett. When push came to shove, Obama continued to cave to Jarrett rather than listen to the people in positions to know better. His incompetence is dwarfed only by his narcissism for taking credit for results for which he had no involvement whatsoever.

One thing is crystal clear – Obama is not presidential material, and he sure as hell should not be president again. At least that’s what I think. How about you?

  • Justine

    Wouldn’t it be a great TV special to have Magnum PI investigate the birth certificates?  (Tom Selleck could play Magnum!)
    🙂 .

  • Justine

    Wouldn’t it be a great TV Magnum PI special to have Magnum investigate the birth certificates?  And let Tom Selleck play Magnum! 
    🙂 .

  • Samual Wren

    From 60 Minutes:

    “I worked for a lot of these guys. And this is one of the most courageous calls, decisions that I think I’ve ever seen a president make. For all of the concerns that I’ve just been talking about. The uncertainty of the intelligence. The consequences of it going bad. The risk to the lives of the Americans involved. It was a very gutsy call,” Gates said.

  • skinny malinky

    Come on, hasn’t this website learned about trusting anonymous sources?  Why is this one report more believable that the many reports that contradict this (once again) completely anonymous and unfounded accusation.  This is all third hand information posted anonymously on a website with absolutely no accountability.  But yeah, it must be true! 

    Can you please try to think analytically instead of slavishly posting anything that is negative about Obama?  Three minutes of investigation showed that the anonymous person who originally posted this, Ulsterman, is also a (gasp of shock) a birther.  He’s never provided a source.  Why do you think he’s telling the truth?  Because what he says fits your hateful worldview?

    I’d say this is a new low, but it’s more just par for the course.  No matter how unfounded, how outlandish, how impssoble it must be, if it portrays Obama in a poor light, it must be true.  Pathetic.

  • Helen

    I suggest you grow a brain and have a look at, home of the “insider”. It is a satirical site mocking people like you. This creature “Amy” is accusing the Army of sedition on the basis of a joke site and you believe her. 

  • jecolon

    So you guys still think he “captured in Bin Laden”? My, wouldn’t it be something if a film was brought over by Iran showing that the old fart is still hiding and holding hands with the Supreme Leader of Iran or his body is buried over there? Well, Larry, you seem close to Hillary, why don’t you ask the golden girl if “she” really was involved in the capture. So, a shot in the face, a body thrown in the water for the fishes doesn’t show you the “judgement” that these guys and gals used?? Even with this action, they all should be fired or impeached. I will never give my praise to Gates, big nose P, golden girl or anyone that had something to do with this judgement. How can you take a body and dispose it? You guys keep on believing all these liars but the “glue on the beard” gave it away to me and the concrete evidence that surely will be on it’s way to us soon. The prediction of the elders have been said that ” a large scandal will overcome this Presidency”. I think I will wait before getting on any blog and saying that it was “for sure Bin Laden”. It is like that thing that haunts you, Mr. Larry- yeah, that “whitey tape” that you were given information about. It was false, wasn’t it? This scandal of the birth and social security will surface the prediction does state, but, something is coming ayounder, the old moonshine hillybillie said to his drunk brother. By the way, the entire world is still waiting for the Pentagon (not the group that is famous for deceit) but the real Pentagon to show us MORE evidence and not some talk back and forth to Pakinston about the wives here and there, the kids, the one that escaped. Let us really be certain that 3.5 billion is alot of money for Pakinson- and If I was going to lose it I would say just about “anything” for the people that bombed the compound that had some guy with a long beard living in it . What was his name again? Ankur or Ankar something? I will sit back and “wait” for more information. I hate to see people with their pants down and back paddling- especially with that famous “release of the whitey tape”. This government will leak information to people that blog for others to read.

  • free speech

    Of course, they sound plausible to you. They’re anti-Obama!!! 

    If someone told you that Obama traveled back in time and killed JFK, THAT would sound plausible to a loon like you!

  • free speech

    Poor Amy. Hillary lost 3 years ago. You’ll feel better once you accept that. Or don’t. I love watching your misery.

    Keep making up these “reports”. Everybody knows you and Larry “whitey tape” Johnson are liars. Nothing you’ve ever promised to know has ever panned out. Hillary was supposed to sweep the nomination at the convention. {giggle}


  • free speech

    Hey, Amy! Hillary lost. All the fanciful, 10th-hand stories about Obama not being in control won’t change that. 

    Deal with it. Then keep looking for that “whitey” tape.

  • Ferd Not-My-Site-(click to edit) Berfle

    I need to note for the record that my comment above to “Helen” is meant for “Helen” and not HelenK.

  • Ferd Not-My-Site-(click to edit) Berfle

    You really are awful people, Reverand indeed.  
    RRRA is one of ours, Helen, and we don’t take kindly to those who would unjustly criticize or ridicule her. I strongly urge you find yourself a site devoted to the worship of That One where you can genuflect with the rest of the unwashed herd. In other words, moo-ve along.

  • Ferd Not-My-Site-(click to edit) Berfle

    You really are awful people, Reverand indeed.
    RRRA is one of ours, Helen, and we don’t take kindly to those who would unjustly criticize or ridicule her. I sgtrongly recommend you find yourself a site devoted to the worship of That One where you can genuflect until the cows come home. In other words, moo-ve along.

  • KMFD

    Not everything you read on the intenet is true.

  • Helen

    Ulsterman is as literate as most Teabaggers and you think he has Whitehouse security credentials, “Larry confirms he does” according to Raving Right Reverand Amy, Wow. How stupid are you people? Why insult people in the Military with this made up shit?

  • Helen

    So the Army commits treason against the elected President of the US – on the basis of “Ulsterman”. You should be ashamed of yourself.