<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Do I Start</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1108429</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1108429</guid>
		<description>lgvsdQHkb93cc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lgvsdQHkb93cc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028835</guid>
		<description>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122645159441719325.html

Another interesting article on the bail out.  The concept of sustainability should not be overlooked.  

Although the unions may need to make more concessions, overall I hold management primarily responsible for the problems these companies are experiencing.  It&#039;s not the workers&#039; fault.  (My guess is that management, the state and federal government and the unions all probably need to share responsibility, with the lion&#039;s share going to management.)

Granted unions have already made concessions, but just look at the types of benefits non-union workers have seen taken away over the last few decades.  I can&#039;t help but wonder how many non-union workers even have a pension plan to be concerned about.  

The other thing I&#039;m curious about is exactly how much a bail out of GM would help the parts plants in China, as right now I believe many of the parts used in GM&#039;s U.S. plants are made there (even though the scrap rate is high, it&#039;s supposedly cheaper for them to make the parts there).  I would hope that we could encourage them to find a cost effective way to make more parts in this country (I believe Toyota and Honda make many of their parts here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122645159441719325.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122645159441719325.html</a></p>
<p>Another interesting article on the bail out.  The concept of sustainability should not be overlooked.  </p>
<p>Although the unions may need to make more concessions, overall I hold management primarily responsible for the problems these companies are experiencing.  It&#8217;s not the workers&#8217; fault.  (My guess is that management, the state and federal government and the unions all probably need to share responsibility, with the lion&#8217;s share going to management.)</p>
<p>Granted unions have already made concessions, but just look at the types of benefits non-union workers have seen taken away over the last few decades.  I can&#8217;t help but wonder how many non-union workers even have a pension plan to be concerned about.  </p>
<p>The other thing I&#8217;m curious about is exactly how much a bail out of GM would help the parts plants in China, as right now I believe many of the parts used in GM&#8217;s U.S. plants are made there (even though the scrap rate is high, it&#8217;s supposedly cheaper for them to make the parts there).  I would hope that we could encourage them to find a cost effective way to make more parts in this country (I believe Toyota and Honda make many of their parts here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windy</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028642</link>
		<dc:creator>Windy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028642</guid>
		<description>Finally some wisdom.  First of all as a retired GM machine repair journyman anyone who thinks a machine operator is automaticaly qualified to fix todays industrial machinery has never stepped inside a modern manufacturing plant.  Also the defined benefit pension I earned over 30 years is not up to 20% of my working wage.  It is to supplement SS and retirement savings.  
   When did the PUMA New Dem. Party become anti-union or have the republicans really taken over this site.  
   The price advantage enjoyed by the foreign car makers is the lack of legacy costs. They pay similar wages and benifits to keep the union at bay but are currently not paying for the older workforce and pension obligations.  What happens when their workforce becomes older and begins to retire.  The state of PA gave volkswagon no taxes for 10 years, built an interstate and rail spur to the plant that Chrysler built for them to make cars.  What happened after their 10 years was up?  They closed the plant and moved to Mexico.  These foreign companies have no obligation to stand with this country if they are needed.  All the car plants were converted to war equipment during WWII and won the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally some wisdom.  First of all as a retired GM machine repair journyman anyone who thinks a machine operator is automaticaly qualified to fix todays industrial machinery has never stepped inside a modern manufacturing plant.  Also the defined benefit pension I earned over 30 years is not up to 20% of my working wage.  It is to supplement SS and retirement savings.<br />
   When did the PUMA New Dem. Party become anti-union or have the republicans really taken over this site.<br />
   The price advantage enjoyed by the foreign car makers is the lack of legacy costs. They pay similar wages and benifits to keep the union at bay but are currently not paying for the older workforce and pension obligations.  What happens when their workforce becomes older and begins to retire.  The state of PA gave volkswagon no taxes for 10 years, built an interstate and rail spur to the plant that Chrysler built for them to make cars.  What happened after their 10 years was up?  They closed the plant and moved to Mexico.  These foreign companies have no obligation to stand with this country if they are needed.  All the car plants were converted to war equipment during WWII and won the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda C.</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028207</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028207</guid>
		<description>bingo
Blaming the unions became popular under Reaganomics..Greed was only good for the CEO&#039;s, but sinful for the working stiff. Wealth shifted upward and more people entered poverty. Enter Bush II, which is only Reaganomics on steroids and we are dealing with the effects. Remember Bush&#039;s plan for reconstruction after Katrina..awarding large no-bid contracts to favorable companies and screwing the employees on minimum wage requirements.  Helping tax paying Americans is akin to socialism and welfare.  Bailing out large financial institutions that continue with their bad decision making,no restrictions, and flagrant waste of money, is somehow more palatable to the American psyche.

Remember the Big Three are asking for a small fraction of what AIG burned in one month, while entertaining themselves at spa resorts and hunting trips. At least the Big Three produce a real tangible product that serves a purpose rather than speculative unregulated credit swap derivatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bingo<br />
Blaming the unions became popular under Reaganomics..Greed was only good for the CEO&#8217;s, but sinful for the working stiff. Wealth shifted upward and more people entered poverty. Enter Bush II, which is only Reaganomics on steroids and we are dealing with the effects. Remember Bush&#8217;s plan for reconstruction after Katrina..awarding large no-bid contracts to favorable companies and screwing the employees on minimum wage requirements.  Helping tax paying Americans is akin to socialism and welfare.  Bailing out large financial institutions that continue with their bad decision making,no restrictions, and flagrant waste of money, is somehow more palatable to the American psyche.</p>
<p>Remember the Big Three are asking for a small fraction of what AIG burned in one month, while entertaining themselves at spa resorts and hunting trips. At least the Big Three produce a real tangible product that serves a purpose rather than speculative unregulated credit swap derivatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammie</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028094</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1028094</guid>
		<description>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/bailout_nation_obama_the_big_3.html

Interesting article about the big three bail.  I&#039;m not sure if the type of bankruptcy referred to would be Chapter 11, and what they would do to the present stock holders.  

There are many factors to consider, including the fact that most defined benefit plans have gone the way of the dinosaur, and the tax payers left holding the bag for these pensions probably won&#039;t get similar benefits in the future.  

I don&#039;t think that any retirement plans were ever intended to replace 100% of an employees working wage, and I&#039;m also not sure if the PBGC maximum monthly benefit tables would really bring the retirees down to 60% (again, there are many laws and regulations covering pensions, and it is possible that these plans would place a great burden on the PBGC if the companies were allowed to fail at once, the insurance premiums most likely don&#039;t factor in such drastic economic conditions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/bailout_nation_obama_the_big_3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/bailout_nation_obama_the_big_3.html</a></p>
<p>Interesting article about the big three bail.  I&#8217;m not sure if the type of bankruptcy referred to would be Chapter 11, and what they would do to the present stock holders.  </p>
<p>There are many factors to consider, including the fact that most defined benefit plans have gone the way of the dinosaur, and the tax payers left holding the bag for these pensions probably won&#8217;t get similar benefits in the future.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that any retirement plans were ever intended to replace 100% of an employees working wage, and I&#8217;m also not sure if the PBGC maximum monthly benefit tables would really bring the retirees down to 60% (again, there are many laws and regulations covering pensions, and it is possible that these plans would place a great burden on the PBGC if the companies were allowed to fail at once, the insurance premiums most likely don&#8217;t factor in such drastic economic conditions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snickers</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027964</link>
		<dc:creator>Snickers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027964</guid>
		<description>Cookie Grandmother, I agree with you.  And unfortunately I find myself agreeing with Mr. Obama on this issue and for the first time I&#039;m actually glad he won this election.  Saying &quot;too bad, so sad&quot; doesn&#039;t address this problem.  Not bailing out the auto industry right now would lead to total economic collapse in this country.  For every job lost in the auto industry, a whole lot of people and businesses are affected.  People who work in the auto industry pay taxes, they support local businesses and their tax dollars will help this country get back on its feet.  If we continue to have massive unemployment then our tax base becomes less, and we will have a bigger depression than we had in the thirties because we have a heck of a lot more people here - many of them armed and in your face.  You think we, all of us, can survive millions more Americans unemployed?  I don&#039;t think so.  We might not like it; we may not agree with this bailout, but I sure hope we choose to help each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookie Grandmother, I agree with you.  And unfortunately I find myself agreeing with Mr. Obama on this issue and for the first time I&#8217;m actually glad he won this election.  Saying &#8220;too bad, so sad&#8221; doesn&#8217;t address this problem.  Not bailing out the auto industry right now would lead to total economic collapse in this country.  For every job lost in the auto industry, a whole lot of people and businesses are affected.  People who work in the auto industry pay taxes, they support local businesses and their tax dollars will help this country get back on its feet.  If we continue to have massive unemployment then our tax base becomes less, and we will have a bigger depression than we had in the thirties because we have a heck of a lot more people here &#8211; many of them armed and in your face.  You think we, all of us, can survive millions more Americans unemployed?  I don&#8217;t think so.  We might not like it; we may not agree with this bailout, but I sure hope we choose to help each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snickers</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027946</link>
		<dc:creator>Snickers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027946</guid>
		<description>And in this economic climate is Mr. Obama still considering a week-long inauguration festival?  Can we really afford a lot of parties courtesy of tax payers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in this economic climate is Mr. Obama still considering a week-long inauguration festival?  Can we really afford a lot of parties courtesy of tax payers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snickers</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027926</link>
		<dc:creator>Snickers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027926</guid>
		<description>Wild Child, I agree with you.  But are we going to learn from any of this?  If people hadn&#039;t been so in love with Reagan and allowed him to deregulate everything, we would not now be circling the drain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wild Child, I agree with you.  But are we going to learn from any of this?  If people hadn&#8217;t been so in love with Reagan and allowed him to deregulate everything, we would not now be circling the drain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James (San Jose)</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027923</link>
		<dc:creator>James (San Jose)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027923</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the big three are too big to let fail. The rust belt is in enough trouble as it is without GM, Ford and Chrysler failing.  Liquidating any of these companies would flat-line our economy. 

There was plenty of incompetence in the higher reaches of these corporations.   Detroit and specifically GM has never really recovered from the oil shocks of the 1970&#039;s. Instead of facing up to CAFE standards they found a huge loophole that you could, well, drive a truck through. It worked for a long time, until oil hit $100.00 a barrel and then some.

G.M. now claims to not have enough money to run past six months.  It was not the Unions that got G.M. into this mess.  The UAW just took 100% of the burden for healthcare in last contract.  G.M.&#039;s contribution was a big fat goose egg and it still is having cash problems. 

Union labor only represents 10% of the work force.  In the auto industry the UAW has been battered into giving all manner of give backs for job security.  The final knife in the ribs is that the workers are still being laid off and factories are still being shuttered even after wage cuts and benefit reductions.  The workers get creamed but the C.E.O. pay is not trimmed at all.

There is a excellent reason for the Pension to be bailed out by the government.  That is the support of thousands of retired workers.  Many of those worker worked their entire productive lives to get those pensions.  Please note that there productive lives are now past.  Are you really proposing that these elderly people now return to the work force?

If the pension fails it means all those former workers would be left destitute.  The Federal guarantee behind the Pension would not support the levels of pay they are getting.  Figure them only getting 60% of their present stipend from Uncle Sam, if they are lucky.  How does that sound to you, could you make it only only 60% of your take home pay?  Remember the only employment option you might have is a greeter at Walmart. Oh and Walmart just closed down because their are no autoworkers to buy their products.

So not only do you have the knock on the economy from Ford or GM shuttering you also have the knock from impoverished pensioners who now only have 60% of their purchasing power.  But hey, let the market sort it all out right?  Where have we seen that attitude before?  Does the Name Herbert Hoover ring a bell?

It is easy to shout &quot;let it fail&quot; it is facile to complain about &quot;government handouts&quot;  It is another thing to try to live through such a market correction.  Bailing out Detroit is a dicey proposition but doing nothing; letting either the companies or pension fail is not a real option.  We have to pull the baby out of the burning building first.  We can worry about who set the fire later.

Look if a peanut farmer from Georgia found a way to rescue Chrysler a Community Organizer from Chicago can find a way to save Detroit. A targeted loan that requires the company getting it to manufacture high MPG vehicles is doable.  They could further sweeten the deal by offering consumers no or super-low interest loans if they turn in a truck or SUV for scrapping.  We just gave almost a trillion dollars away to Wall Street with no strings attached; we can certainly afford to rescue one of the prime movers of our economy.  At the very least we can insure that hard working stiffs don&#039;t have to spend the last years of their lives living under a freeway overpass.  Or is that too much to ask of your tax dollars?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the big three are too big to let fail. The rust belt is in enough trouble as it is without GM, Ford and Chrysler failing.  Liquidating any of these companies would flat-line our economy. </p>
<p>There was plenty of incompetence in the higher reaches of these corporations.   Detroit and specifically GM has never really recovered from the oil shocks of the 1970&#8242;s. Instead of facing up to CAFE standards they found a huge loophole that you could, well, drive a truck through. It worked for a long time, until oil hit $100.00 a barrel and then some.</p>
<p>G.M. now claims to not have enough money to run past six months.  It was not the Unions that got G.M. into this mess.  The UAW just took 100% of the burden for healthcare in last contract.  G.M.&#8217;s contribution was a big fat goose egg and it still is having cash problems. </p>
<p>Union labor only represents 10% of the work force.  In the auto industry the UAW has been battered into giving all manner of give backs for job security.  The final knife in the ribs is that the workers are still being laid off and factories are still being shuttered even after wage cuts and benefit reductions.  The workers get creamed but the C.E.O. pay is not trimmed at all.</p>
<p>There is a excellent reason for the Pension to be bailed out by the government.  That is the support of thousands of retired workers.  Many of those worker worked their entire productive lives to get those pensions.  Please note that there productive lives are now past.  Are you really proposing that these elderly people now return to the work force?</p>
<p>If the pension fails it means all those former workers would be left destitute.  The Federal guarantee behind the Pension would not support the levels of pay they are getting.  Figure them only getting 60% of their present stipend from Uncle Sam, if they are lucky.  How does that sound to you, could you make it only only 60% of your take home pay?  Remember the only employment option you might have is a greeter at Walmart. Oh and Walmart just closed down because their are no autoworkers to buy their products.</p>
<p>So not only do you have the knock on the economy from Ford or GM shuttering you also have the knock from impoverished pensioners who now only have 60% of their purchasing power.  But hey, let the market sort it all out right?  Where have we seen that attitude before?  Does the Name Herbert Hoover ring a bell?</p>
<p>It is easy to shout &#8220;let it fail&#8221; it is facile to complain about &#8220;government handouts&#8221;  It is another thing to try to live through such a market correction.  Bailing out Detroit is a dicey proposition but doing nothing; letting either the companies or pension fail is not a real option.  We have to pull the baby out of the burning building first.  We can worry about who set the fire later.</p>
<p>Look if a peanut farmer from Georgia found a way to rescue Chrysler a Community Organizer from Chicago can find a way to save Detroit. A targeted loan that requires the company getting it to manufacture high MPG vehicles is doable.  They could further sweeten the deal by offering consumers no or super-low interest loans if they turn in a truck or SUV for scrapping.  We just gave almost a trillion dollars away to Wall Street with no strings attached; we can certainly afford to rescue one of the prime movers of our economy.  At the very least we can insure that hard working stiffs don&#8217;t have to spend the last years of their lives living under a freeway overpass.  Or is that too much to ask of your tax dollars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027781</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027781</guid>
		<description>LOL-  

well even if they&#039;d gotten the name correct, the post still shows head-in-ass theory and just doesn&#039;t get it.

the american auto industry has been faltering for 30 yrs and didn&#039;t fix themselves when given the opportunity.

they are outdated in what they offer and how they operate-

it is not..&lt;b&gt;IT IS NOT&lt;/b&gt; the duty of this nation to bail out companies, no matter who the hell they are-

there are actually companies in this country that made a choice, close down or upgrade and change their equipment from building one product and switching to build a whole other product that is of need in this date and time-

let the auto industries change their facilities and build windmills!  we can have one standing right next to every house!

(well not exactly, there is the bird safety issue, but you know what i mean)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL-  </p>
<p>well even if they&#8217;d gotten the name correct, the post still shows head-in-ass theory and just doesn&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>the american auto industry has been faltering for 30 yrs and didn&#8217;t fix themselves when given the opportunity.</p>
<p>they are outdated in what they offer and how they operate-</p>
<p>it is not..<b>IT IS NOT</b> the duty of this nation to bail out companies, no matter who the hell they are-</p>
<p>there are actually companies in this country that made a choice, close down or upgrade and change their equipment from building one product and switching to build a whole other product that is of need in this date and time-</p>
<p>let the auto industries change their facilities and build windmills!  we can have one standing right next to every house!</p>
<p>(well not exactly, there is the bird safety issue, but you know what i mean)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027761</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027761</guid>
		<description>chalk it up to what you want.. i am sick of utter ignorance and brainwashed minds who buy into the bullshit they are sold/told.. whether it be obama or bush and his ilk.

I&#039;m on my 4th extra strength Tylenol in the last hour dealing with horrendous pain.. i can&#039;t find the patience to even discuss this old topic, and such known facts with such brainwashed minds-

i&#039;m moving on from this thread-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chalk it up to what you want.. i am sick of utter ignorance and brainwashed minds who buy into the bullshit they are sold/told.. whether it be obama or bush and his ilk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m on my 4th extra strength Tylenol in the last hour dealing with horrendous pain.. i can&#8217;t find the patience to even discuss this old topic, and such known facts with such brainwashed minds-</p>
<p>i&#8217;m moving on from this thread-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027757</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027757</guid>
		<description>exactly, and where do they draw the line?

i guess it&#039;s where their pockets are lined with donations to their causes, that they draw the line!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly, and where do they draw the line?</p>
<p>i guess it&#8217;s where their pockets are lined with donations to their causes, that they draw the line!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027756</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027756</guid>
		<description>SERIOUSLY,  giving bush credit for being safe for 8 years.. i mean wow.. what can i say..

if i recall we&#039;ve been safe since pearl harbor was bombed in ww2-

it was on bush&#039;s watch 911 happened.. let&#039;s not forget this -

it is bush&#039;s ill conceived, illegal war, that cost 100&#039;s of thousands of INNOCENT iraqi&#039;s their lives..

jesus i can&#039;t even debate this topic with brain dead people who just don&#039;t get it and bought inot the utter bullshit of the corrupt bush administration.

Bush, Cheney and their ilk should be on trial for treason and war crimes. period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SERIOUSLY,  giving bush credit for being safe for 8 years.. i mean wow.. what can i say..</p>
<p>if i recall we&#8217;ve been safe since pearl harbor was bombed in ww2-</p>
<p>it was on bush&#8217;s watch 911 happened.. let&#8217;s not forget this -</p>
<p>it is bush&#8217;s ill conceived, illegal war, that cost 100&#8242;s of thousands of INNOCENT iraqi&#8217;s their lives..</p>
<p>jesus i can&#8217;t even debate this topic with brain dead people who just don&#8217;t get it and bought inot the utter bullshit of the corrupt bush administration.</p>
<p>Bush, Cheney and their ilk should be on trial for treason and war crimes. period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027752</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027752</guid>
		<description>YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/6031/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027749</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/11/11/where-do-i-start/#comment-1027749</guid>
		<description>all due respect what a half ass ignorant response-

her safety wasn&#039;t due to or relied on haliburton and these other companies raping americans of billions and billions in profits-

and we are talking &quot;profits&quot;, not &quot;costs&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all due respect what a half ass ignorant response-</p>
<p>her safety wasn&#8217;t due to or relied on haliburton and these other companies raping americans of billions and billions in profits-</p>
<p>and we are talking &#8220;profits&#8221;, not &#8220;costs&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

