RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Update on Don Siegelman, a curb to Presidential power? Steele for RNC head? unfazed K Street just changes the players, the MLK Brand, public teachers w/fake SSNs, local govts feeling the hurt

1)Time magazine has an update on the disturbing case of Alabama governor Don Siegelman. If you’ve not been following this story lately, it’s worth a look, as it is one of the most egregious cases of political-turned-into-criminal take downs I’ve ever seen.

Next month in Atlanta, a federal court will hear the high-profile appeal of former Alabama governor Don E. Siegelman, whose conviction on corruption charges in 2006 became one of the most publicly debated cases to emerge from eight years of controversy at the Bush Justice Department. Now new documents highlight alleged misconduct by the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney and other prosecutors in the case, including what appears to be extensive and unusual contact between the prosecution and the jury.

2) A paper in NC wonders if Presidential power, which has metastasized over the last few years, will be curbed in an Obama administration. The author sees in Emanuel’s decision to leave Congress to be Obama’s Chief of Staff confirmation that no job in Congress would compare with power in the Executive branch.

Read the rest ->

Presidential power has only further increased since [Andrew] Jackson. The need for government to act quickly in times of crisis, the centering of the president as the icon of national identity in popular culture and the executive branch’s control of information, among other factors, have vested a power in the presidency that far surpasses that of the other branches.

Thus it becomes not surprising to see one of the most powerful members of Congress [Emanuel] agree to become a White House staffer.

THE MORE SERIOUS QUESTION IS WHETHER A TRUE BALANCE OF POWER can be reconstructed. It needs to be. The Framers believed that an imbalance of power among the branches would inevitably lead to abuse and incompetence. The last eight years have proved them right. The Bush administration made constant claims to unlimited power that Congress had neither the will nor the ability to turn back. The resulting morass is history.

Whether an Obama administration will work to restore the constitutional balance is only speculation. The challenge is considerable. Checks and balances are inefficient, and ceding power to a coordinate branch is not easy, particularly when there are so many dire challenges facing the nation. But Emanuel’s choice to accept the chief of staff position rather than continue in Congress vividly demonstrates how much the need to repair the constitutional structure is in order.

I see this question as a moral one in addition to a constitutional one. I wonder if Obama will return any presidential power “to the people.” Hmmmmm.

3) Realclearpolitics has a transcript of Michael Steele announcing his bid for RNC chair. Now THAT would be interesting.

STEELE: I want the gig. I’m ready, I’m ready to lead this party. I think we’ve been kind of wandering and doubting ourselves for far too long. And I think this past election was the culmination of that self-doubt which has to end.

We have a message, I think, of empowerment and ownership and opportunity that resonates United States with Americans. We just need to get back to.

So, we could have an AA RNC chief, and AA president and de facto head of the Democratic party and ???? as DNC chief? Now that should make for some very entertaining racial politics.

4) The WaPo has a piece today about the ever-not-changing work of K Street. Apparently lobbyists see an incoming Obama administration as a reason to re-arrange the deck chairs rather than change how they do business. Out with republican head lobbyists and in with the democratic. Sigh. Oh, yeah, don’t forget the nepotism. Gotta have nepotism.

“Barack Obama campaigned on change. Well, change is good for the lobbying business,” said Ed Rogers, who was an aide to President Ronald Reagan and whose firm has represented such clients as Citigroup, Pfizer and Raytheon. “People will need the expertise and guidance more in the next year than they have in the last five.”

Many of the issues Obama has expressed an interest in tackling early, such as health-care policy, energy and taxes, have broad implications for some of the lobbying world’s most free-spending corporate clients. Patrick Von Bargen, a former chief of staff to Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) and aide to William Donaldson, the former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said he joined Quinn Gillespie this month with the expectation that his knowledge of clean energy issues would be a valued commodity.

“People who have labored in Democratic vineyards for years are familiar with the people involved, but also with the substantive issues, and how Democrats approach those issues,” he said.
——————
Ron Kaufman, a Republican lobbyist at Dutko Worldwide who served as a close adviser to President George H.W. Bush and Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, said he cannot recall a better time to be a Democratic staff member looking for work. But he said his firm has always tried to keep both sides of the aisle covered so it does not have to panic during shifts in political control.

“The only change for us is that the Democrats are now the varsity squad, and I’ve been demoted to the junior varsity,” Kaufman joked.
——————-
Steve Elmendorf, a former top adviser to former House minority leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.), said that he understands why Obama took that approach, but that he does not believe lobbyists will be turned away. “I don’t think they’ve said ‘We’re not going to talk to lobbyists,’ ” Elmendorf said. “They are going to talk to stakeholders. The stakeholders are all going to be represented by lobbyists. It’s not going to be a black-and-white thing.”

Elmendorf is one of several who foresee a boon for the industry. A new Democratic administration and an increasing Democratic tilt in Congress means more activist government, he said. “That means businesses will have the potential for more things to happen to them. If they think that’s coming, they will be hiring people to figure out how to contend with that.”

BO has said he doesn’t want lobbyists to have unfettered access. But I think this stand is likely to quietly die a “death of 1000 cuts” as the collective power of all these lobbyists and their industries / interest groups do everything they can to preserve their influence. This could be very interesting to watch. Get out your hypocrisy-meters. And get out the hip-waders.

5) Newser has a story about the MLK family wanting its piece of the action from MLK / Obama merchandising. Now, as controllers of the MLK estate, etc, it is within the family’s rights to look after its interests. But scurrying after merchandising dollars strikes me as tacky. Of course, it is understandable that the family wants to protect its brand Of course, I don’t personally think of MLK as a BRAND, but I guess that’s a matter of perspective?

The family of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. is demanding a share of the proceeds from the sudden wave of T-shirts, posters and other merchandise depicting the slain civil rights leader alongside Barack Obama.

Isaac Newton Farris Jr., King’s nephew and head of the nonprofit King Center in Atlanta, said the estate is entitled to hundreds of thousands of dollars in licensing fees _ maybe even millions.

“Some of this is probably putting food on people’s plates. We’re not trying to stop anybody from legitimately supporting themselves,” he said, “but we cannot allow our brand to be abused.”

MLK Brand??

6) One of the justifications for “undocumented workers” has long been that those people do the jobs “American’s don’t want to do.” Does that include teaching? Perhaps so, because the Dallas public schools have been hiring people without SSNs and arbitrarily assigning one to them “until they receive a valid number.” Of course, there’s a chance those SSN numbers might be REAL to someone else. The Dallas News has the story:

Years after being advised by a state agency to stop, the Dallas Independent School District continued to provide foreign citizens with fake Social Security numbers to get them on the payroll quickly.

Some of the numbers were real Social Security numbers already assigned to people elsewhere. And in some cases, the state’s educator certification office unknowingly used the bogus numbers to run criminal background checks on the new hires, most of whom were brought in to teach bilingual classes.
—————
The investigative report, obtained by The News through a records request, found “that the inappropriate procedure of assigning false SSNs has been systemic for several years” within DISD’s alternative certification program, which prepares new teachers for state certification when they don’t have traditional credentials.

A call Thursday to DISD’s alternative certification office was not returned. In recent years, DISD has hired people from various countries, including Mexico and Spain, to deal with a shortage of bilingual teachers.
—————-
In July, the district discovered that 26 of the false numbers were in use after matching DISD employee Social Security numbers with the Social Security Administration database. The numbers were already being used in Pennsylvania. DISD officials did not know Thursday whether the practice had caused problems for anyone holding the legitimate numbers.

Anyone out there having received an IRS notice of unpaid taxes on undeclared income might want to keep an eye on this story.

7) Still don’t see how the damaged economy will touch you? This article in the Christian Science Monitor should help clear THAT up somewhat.

If the states had their way, they would like Congress to give them help in four areas: help with the growing number of people applying for Medicaid, more funding for the rising unemployed, help with the growing number on food stamps, and an injection of funds to jump-start infrastructure projects that are ready to go.

In my area, the local schools have requested and gotten substantial increases each year. Since I live in a “progressive” area, increases are regularly sought for a variety of things: sidewalks (good), artwork around a remote public works building (?), community gardens (are you kidding me?), stormwater run-off infrastructure, another municipal pool (we only have 3) with glass pebbles inlaid on the floor, and more money for roads (well, . . . ) even as development in the form of housing continues unabated, with taller and taller and “greener and greener” condos going up

Oh, and we don’t allow “big box” stores in my community. They’re so, so, tacky and cheap, you know. So everyone drives over the county line to shop at Target and the brain trust here loses out on what remaining retail sales taxes are available. Even as more housing is built, property taxes increase because new housing does not pay for itself in terms of schools, sewer, water, and other city services – at least not here.
And the local university (isn’t there always one in a “progressive” town?) often buys up tracts of land, taking it off the tax rolls. So, as the university uses more services, it also cuts available tax funds to the town. And the university has a multi-billion dollar endowment. . .

Sigh.

  • DAB

    A couple of months ago UTNE Reader, a left-leaning magazine, recently published an article entitled, “The Imperial Presidency” which outlined the evolution of that position from the Founding Fathers to today and the dangers that lay ahead. They illustrated how Bush greatly expanded this power and the secrecy/unaccountability of the Executive branch and concluded that the next President would have unprecedented power.

    Combine that with Obama’s obvious penchant for secrecy, renewal of the FISA act (which he supported), an unchecked ego and minions of frenzied supporters and we have a problem folks.

    Think that Steele is a good choice for RNC position. He’s likable and offers a logical case for the Republicans.

  • Bud White

    I think Steele should be RNC chief. I like him and it would be good for Republicans and good for African American representation in both parties.

  • KarenG

    There has been some talk in Chicago news that Donna Brazille is Obama’s choice for the DNC. That would be a trifecta for African Americans.

  • Betty Lou

    I see this question as a moral one in addition to a constitutional one. I wonder if Obama will return any presidential power “to the people.” Hmmmmm.

    ———

    The unitary executive doesn’t work, neither do Atwater tricks.

    Strong policy which progresses to meet the demands of the times WILL work.

    This is best exemplified through the success of our democratic system.

    It’s already a flush, unless the Clinton people do the right thing, understanding WHY governments, why the US government has succeeded.

    I suppose the lure of power is strong, but it destroys, for any number of reasons, either the people behind the presidency get it right, or the US fails, even more.

    If Obama does go the executive signing route, and there have been hints he will, I hope the ACLU is on it, suing him for his abuse of the Constitution, and the law.

    Bush’s “rules” need to be changed, but through the democratic process, not by the dictate of Cheney, minor.

    The “unitary” is already in a state of decline, Obama’s people, some of them anyway, seem a little thick in understanding the situation is not static, they’re not inheriting the same country Bush did, with the economy, and the wars, lost, people hip to the PR tricks.

    And that’s the problem, they can’t offer solutions, all they do is PR.

    On the plus side, NASA has put a working toilet of some sort on the space station.

    I mean, of you’re an astronaut, it must be like your birthday and Christmas, rolled into one.

    If it works, of course — plumbing in space…

  • DawnellesSICKofPOLITICIANS

    funny since Pelosi didn’t have the guts to impeach Bush what makes you think she would fight her new LOVE?

    lmao no way – she HEARTS Bambi with stars and swirls and swishes and bubbles all a glow!! don’t cha know?

    pfffffffft

  • Betty Lou

    I agree, I find Pelosi revolting, same with the rest, truly, I cannot convey my disgust to you in regard to her, and Reid.

    But, you know, they keep screwing up, and they lose even more and more power, like Cheney, and Bush, they become so ineffective, so laughable, they are simply isolated, functionally obsolete.

  • Betty Lou

    I guess I mean to say the change will not come through Congress, a Congress, it would seem incapable of understanding, much less making, law.

    They’re broken, I dont give them a second thought.

    And they’re stupid, too.

  • snosandy

    I like Michael Steele a lot. He would be great for the RNC. It would make AA’s more independent thinkers in politics instead of over 90% following “the One” AA leader.

  • jwrjr

    Re: #2 – curbing the power of the executive office. You are joking, aren’t you? It very much appears that Obama doesn’t want to be President (which requires working with and compromising with Congress). He wants to be Dictator (“We don’t need no stinking restrictions on Presidential power!) Few took Bush seriously when he said that the country should be a dictatorship … as long as he was the Dictator. Don’t make that same mistake with Obama.

  • LisaB

    Certainly didn’t mean to suggest BO would eschew any power of the office. Refusing power is NOT something I see him doing – at all.

  • oowawa

    I agree. I will be happy to see an AA faction represented by people like Michael Steele and Bill Cosby gain credibility and exposure. These articulate men can stand on their own accomplishments and galvanize AA support around their political and social positions.

  • snosandy

    We learned of their conservative social position on traditional family values by the way they voted for Prop 8 in California.

  • EightBelles

    I, too, would like to put in a good word for Michael Steele. Steele strikes me as a man of honor and substance. Steele was not afraid to speak the truth about Barack Obama throughout the primaries and election. A few days ago I did some research online into Mr. Steele’s background. His biography is compelling and worth a read. Even though I’m still a registered Democrat, I’m liking what I see with players like Michael Steele and Sarah Palin as upcoming movers and shakers within the Republican Party. This new generation of Republicans is looking not only versatile but HONEST which is much more than can be said of my own party, the Dems.

  • lizpolaris

    Good grief Susan, I thought you live in WA state but #7 is a spot on description of my hometown in NC, right down to the glass beads in the floor of the atrium of the new swimming pool! I thought most college towns have it figured out, and it’s just us who have a dead downtown and a toxic business environment. Lack of businesses gives us no tax base, and thus property taxes are so high, that University housekeeping staff and hospital nurses can’t afford to live within 10 miles of town. They will be the ones screwed in the upcoming depression…

  • Dawnelle

    you won’t see me disagreeing with that!

    nawp ;-)

  • http://noquarterusa No-nonsense-Nancy

    I hope Hillary stays in the senate so she can try to ward off some of the radical agenda that I thnk B O is going to try to get over on us. Also, I think he will try to get rid of her after a while and then she will be completely out. If she is in the senate when his administration bombs she can’t be blamed and she can be in place to run in 2012 if she wants to.

  • Kelly and Mikea

    For those who have not signed the RallyCongress Petition Regarding Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate,

    For those who have not signed the RallyCongress Petition Regarding Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate, I encourage you to do so. As of right now, 95,332 Petitions have been signed. I personally would like to see at 100,000 to be signed and delivered by December 1, 2008. Before the Electorial College meet.

    Below is a Copy Only of the Petition. To sign it and have a copy go to Your State Representatives please follow this link:

    http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis/

    Sign the Petition : 95,332 Letters and Emails Sent So Far
    Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: “No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”

    There are numerous questions as to Obama’s citizen status raising suspicion and doubt about Obama constitutional qualification to be president. To settle these questions Mr. Obama must produce proof of citizenship!

    Documents that must be produced include;
    (a) a certified copy of “vault” (original long version) birth certificate;
    (b) certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham;
    (c) a certified copy Certification of Citizenship;
    (d) a certified copy Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity;
    (e) certified copies of admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and
    (f) certified copies of any court orders or legal documents changing his name from Barry Soetoro.

    It is reasonable that these documents should be produced considering that his father is Kenyan, his adoptive father is Indonesian, and his grandmother claims to have been present at his birth in Kenya. If he is a natural born citizen then producing these documents should not be any problem.

    These allegations will not go away until Mr. Obama produces proof to federal authorities and the public. If he will not do so voluntarily he must be compelled by every means available. You, as an employee of The People, have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution.

    We The People are demanding you to make every effort, both public and private, to resolve this fundamental Constitutional question before 20 January.

    Add Your Comments (optional):

    Enter Your Name and Submit to Sign
    First Name:
    Last Name:
    don’t display my name
    Email (Not displayed):

    Zip Code:

    People signing the “Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis” petition!

    http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244/stop-obama-constitutional-crisis
    State: Pick one

  • cacky

    I agree with you Nancy 100%. We need Hillary in the Senate. I also agree with eight belles about Michael Steel. I think that he is sharp. I would rather see him as President over Obama. Steel has good character and would never have involved himself with the radicals that Obama has.

blog comments powered by Disqus