Obama’s Keystone Cops + Open Thread
By Bronwyn's Harbor on January 18, 2012 at 7:15 PM in Current Affairs

Keystone Pipeline, which would carry oil from Canada's carbon-heavy tar sands to refineries on the Gulf Coast - National Journal, Canada
It’s all about the politics of the 2012 presidential race. Obama’s #1 (and only) concern? Obama winning the 2012 reelection race. But what about the rest of us, about whom Obama does NOT care? Besides the few thousands who might have gotten Keystone jobs but who’ll remain jobless far longer, ALL of us will get to see our prices rise at the gas pump anywhere from 10 to 15 cents per gallon (reports CNN’s Upfront). The takeaway here? Never ever believe that Obama cares about a single one of his constituents, and they are us. We don’t matter to the big O.
In a decision that quickly re-ignited a fierce energy debate, the Obama administration on Wednesday rejected the controversial Keystone XL pipeline because the 60-day deadline imposed by Republicans did not allow adequate time to review an alternate route through an ecologically sensitive area in Nebraska.
Deputy Secretary of State William Burns made the announcement on President Obama’s behalf on the project that would carry oil from Canada’s carbon-heavy tar sands to refineries on the Gulf Coast. TransCanada, the company seeking to build the $7 billion, 1,700-mile pipeline, will be able to reapply with a new route avoiding an ecologically sensitive area of Nebraska, sources told National Journal.
Put more simply, the Obama administration hit back at Republicans by saying no because of their forcing him to decide on the project in just 60 days. Republicans in Congress and on the campaign trail promptly painted the decision as a rejection of thousands of American jobs purely for political reasons. …
“Obama Rejecting Pipeline, Pokes Back At GOP,” National Journal, January 18, 2012
How does Obama dare to “kill” a plan — albeit temporarily — widely touted to bring jobs to the U.S.?
The White House has been trying to thread a needle between two segments of the Democratic base split over the pipeline: labor unions that support the project for the jobs it would bring, and environmentalists who oppose it for the adverse impacts that development of tar-sands oil could have on the environment.
The administration’s decision was not a big surprise. White House spokesman Jay Carney and other senior officials have repeatedly said that the Republicans’ 60-day deadline, which was included in the payroll-tax deal Obama signed into law last month, did not give the administration enough time to appropriately review the project plans. The State Department announced last fall that it would postpone a decision on the permit while an alternate route was developed to avoid Nebraska’s Ogallala Aquifer, which supplies water to millions of people.
I am a bit confused. The environmentalists are a force in American politics, but aren’t the unions more powerful and more important to presidential contest by populating and financing the ground games, getting out the vote, supplying great numbers of animated-appearing supporters at campaign rallies, and donating millions?
Why did Obama choose this time to make the announcement?
The timing of the announcement was more surprising, since the administration had until Feb. 21 to decide. But a Wednesday announcement does make some political and economic sense. It allows Obama to go on offense before Thursday’s debate between Republican presidential candidates in South Carolina and before his own State of the Union address next Tuesday. It also comes before public anger could grow if gasoline prices continue their upward climb in the weeks ahead.
But as Charles Krauthammer points out, Obama was the one who insisted on the February deadline, stating last year that he needed 12 months to “study” the plan. Obama’s decision, Krauthammer said, is ALL about the 2012 election campaign.
This story is a bit of a rush. Please feel free to fill in the blanks.
Read more: “Obama Rejecting Pipeline, Pokes Back At GOP,” National Journal, January 18, 2012



















