<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dueling Solyndra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559821</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559821</guid>
		<description>I think you need to dig a little harder. 


Again, you quote fairly meaningless articles that do not say or quote any saying that the loan guarantees were actually rejectreject by the Bush Admin. What sentence says that exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to dig a little harder. </p>
<p>Again, you quote fairly meaningless articles that do not say or quote any saying that the loan guarantees were actually rejectreject by the Bush Admin. What sentence says that exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559662</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559662</guid>
		<description>wow, you still have that tin foil cap on!  And a little bit to tight I might add.
http://nation.foxnews.com/solyndra/2011/09/14/bush-admin-voted-against-solyndra-loan
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63484.htm
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63484.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, you still have that tin foil cap on!  And a little bit to tight I might add.<br />
<a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/solyndra/2011/09/14/bush-admin-voted-against-solyndra-loan" rel="nofollow">http://nation.foxnews.com/solyndra/2011/09/14/bush-admin-voted-against-solyndra-loan</a><br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63484.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63484.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63484.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63484.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559573</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559573</guid>
		<description>That is not really an article. It is an opinion piece written by a very conservative writer. The &quot;denied&quot; is just the author&#039;s BS opinion. Show me a quote from anyone of significance that was involved in the process that say the loan guarantees to Solyndra were &quot;denied&quot; under Bush. The decisions were just held-over for the new Adminstration. They were in process. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not really an article. It is an opinion piece written by a very conservative writer. The &#8220;denied&#8221; is just the author&#8217;s BS opinion. Show me a quote from anyone of significance that was involved in the process that say the loan guarantees to Solyndra were &#8220;denied&#8221; under Bush. The decisions were just held-over for the new Adminstration. They were in process. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559470</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559470</guid>
		<description>How sad is it that we are surprised when a network, a &lt;i&gt;news&lt;/i&gt; media actually does it&#039;s damn job? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How sad is it that we are surprised when a network, a <i>news</i> media actually does it&#8217;s damn job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottymac54</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559328</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottymac54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559328</guid>
		<description>Marvin, the number of &quot;Obama=Satan&quot; voters pale in comparison to the number of those who have simply never seen him as competent, qualified, and ideologically appropriate to serve as president.

You&#039;re not targeting the unhinged wingnuts here, and you know it.

You&#039;re trying to propagandize Americans who realize they own their votes and are willing to assert that Barky&#039;s rule has exceeded their worst expectations of what they knew would transpire, if he was elected in 2008.

I&#039;d be willing to bet there are readers that are so disgusted by the GOP candidates, they will stay home, or even might vote for Obama.

What you don&#039;t get is, you&#039;re doing such a perfect representation of the 2008 Obots that demanded blind obedience to their ideals, that you&#039;re having the opposite effect of what you intend.

You&#039;re REMINDING them why they left the Democrats as a whole, and reinforcing why they would never choose to return.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvin, the number of &#8220;Obama=Satan&#8221; voters pale in comparison to the number of those who have simply never seen him as competent, qualified, and ideologically appropriate to serve as president.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not targeting the unhinged wingnuts here, and you know it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re trying to propagandize Americans who realize they own their votes and are willing to assert that Barky&#8217;s rule has exceeded their worst expectations of what they knew would transpire, if he was elected in 2008.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be willing to bet there are readers that are so disgusted by the GOP candidates, they will stay home, or even might vote for Obama.</p>
<p>What you don&#8217;t get is, you&#8217;re doing such a perfect representation of the 2008 Obots that demanded blind obedience to their ideals, that you&#8217;re having the opposite effect of what you intend.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re REMINDING them why they left the Democrats as a whole, and reinforcing why they would never choose to return.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559278</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559278</guid>
		<description>Did you bother to read the article Harp2 provided...
&quot;The fact is the Energy Department under President Bush DENIED the loan request from Solyndra during the administration’s waning days in early January of 2009. The Bush Energy Department denied the loan because the “company didn’t have good long-term prospects.”
PA, try reality for once.
Perhaps olivia1998 is right.
Didn&#039;t Valerie Jarret had some scheme in chicago housing funds.....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you bother to read the article Harp2 provided&#8230;<br />
&#8220;The fact is the Energy Department under President Bush DENIED the loan request from Solyndra during the administration’s waning days in early January of 2009. The Bush Energy Department denied the loan because the “company didn’t have good long-term prospects.”<br />
PA, try reality for once.<br />
Perhaps olivia1998 is right.<br />
Didn&#8217;t Valerie Jarret had some scheme in chicago housing funds&#8230;..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Riot</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559256</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Riot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559256</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; They are purposefully sabotaging our economy to hurt Obama&#039;s reelection prospects.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh really? How many budgets and bills have passed the Democrat controlled Senate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> They are purposefully sabotaging our economy to hurt Obama&#8217;s reelection prospects.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh really? How many budgets and bills have passed the Democrat controlled Senate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Riot</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559255</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Riot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559255</guid>
		<description>Is there any other kind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any other kind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559253</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559253</guid>
		<description>Shelfing the project by the Bush Admin two weeks before Obama took over is hardly denying the loan. It was shelved because the clock ran out for them. It was taken up again after Obama took over, like many many things when a new adminstration takes over. 

Again provide any proof whatsoever that the Bush Adminstration actually killed the approval. In fact, many of those under Bush who first looked at it eventually where the same ones (panel) who approved it.

Kaiser was also connected to the Walmart family who are big time Republicans and investors in Solyndra. In additioin, Kaiser himself had no investment in Solyndra, only a family trust did, so no personal financial gain. 

Besides all of this BS, there was nothing wrong in the first place with giving the loan guarantee. We should be supporting our solar industry. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shelfing the project by the Bush Admin two weeks before Obama took over is hardly denying the loan. It was shelved because the clock ran out for them. It was taken up again after Obama took over, like many many things when a new adminstration takes over. </p>
<p>Again provide any proof whatsoever that the Bush Adminstration actually killed the approval. In fact, many of those under Bush who first looked at it eventually where the same ones (panel) who approved it.</p>
<p>Kaiser was also connected to the Walmart family who are big time Republicans and investors in Solyndra. In additioin, Kaiser himself had no investment in Solyndra, only a family trust did, so no personal financial gain. </p>
<p>Besides all of this BS, there was nothing wrong in the first place with giving the loan guarantee. We should be supporting our solar industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Riot</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559252</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Riot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559252</guid>
		<description>The reason you can make the claims that Obama is scandal free is because the MSM gives the guy a total pass. Obama was a member of a virulent white hating &quot;church&quot; for 20 years. But that didn&#039;t become a scandal because Obama and Wright &lt;b&gt;staged&lt;/b&gt; a breakup and everyone in the MSM went along with it. It wasn&#039;t as if they had any reason to doubt Obama. I mean, he didn&#039;t rail against whites in any of his books or anything like that.

I&#039;m neither a Republican or a Democrat, neither conservative or liberal. I am a moderate, something that both sides despise equally. And the feeling is mutual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason you can make the claims that Obama is scandal free is because the MSM gives the guy a total pass. Obama was a member of a virulent white hating &#8220;church&#8221; for 20 years. But that didn&#8217;t become a scandal because Obama and Wright <b>staged</b> a breakup and everyone in the MSM went along with it. It wasn&#8217;t as if they had any reason to doubt Obama. I mean, he didn&#8217;t rail against whites in any of his books or anything like that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m neither a Republican or a Democrat, neither conservative or liberal. I am a moderate, something that both sides despise equally. And the feeling is mutual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559251</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559251</guid>
		<description>Take off your tinfoil hat. Give us some proof. Anything.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take off your tinfoil hat. Give us some proof. Anything&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559250</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559250</guid>
		<description>The loan guarantees where given in March 2009 (less than two months after Obama took over), so those 2010 donations were a bit late and were to the California Democrats. How much did Solyndra donate to the Republican party? The Washington Times does not tell us that.

From the very conservative Reason Magazine:

http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/26/solyndra-and-the-gop

&quot;Solyndra and the GOP&quot;

&quot;In 2010 and 2011, according to Senate lobbying records, Solyndra spent $130,000 on lobbyists at the Washington Tax Group LLC. Solyndra’s lobbyists there included Greg Nickerson, a former aide to Republican congressmen Bill Thomas and Jim McCrery. Mr. Nickerson “served on the Delegate and Caucus Team at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York and worked as an attorney advisor to the National Republican Senatorial Committee during the 2004 and 2006 elections,” according to his biography on his lobbying firm web site. Also on the Solyndra account at Washington Tax Group LLC was Jan Fowler, whose Capitol Hill experience came as an aide to another Republican, Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio.&quot;

&quot;In other words, rather than simply attacking the Democrats for shoveling taxpayer money into a solar energy company that eventually failed, the Republicans might ask themselves how so many of their own former public servants wound up on the company’s payroll, and why so many of their own senators and President Bush backed the law that created the loan guarantee program.&quot;


Companies make donations all the time. Good for them. The billions pumped into Washington by big oil and big nuclear leave those of the alternative energy or solar industry in the dust. Hard for the alternative energy sector to get any love or attention in Washington when they are up against the big money of the oil and nuclear energy industries. Those two big industries outspend (mostly with Republicans) the alternative energy sector a thousand times over.

Why have there been no charges laid or any real claims of corruption, given this Solyndra transaction has been looked at with great detail by Republicans? Nothing really has come out of this.

Not sure what the point of your article really is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The loan guarantees where given in March 2009 (less than two months after Obama took over), so those 2010 donations were a bit late and were to the California Democrats. How much did Solyndra donate to the Republican party? The Washington Times does not tell us that.</p>
<p>From the very conservative Reason Magazine:</p>
<p><a href="http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/26/solyndra-and-the-gop" rel="nofollow">http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/26/solyndra-and-the-gop</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Solyndra and the GOP&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In 2010 and 2011, according to Senate lobbying records, Solyndra spent $130,000 on lobbyists at the Washington Tax Group LLC. Solyndra’s lobbyists there included Greg Nickerson, a former aide to Republican congressmen Bill Thomas and Jim McCrery. Mr. Nickerson “served on the Delegate and Caucus Team at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York and worked as an attorney advisor to the National Republican Senatorial Committee during the 2004 and 2006 elections,” according to his biography on his lobbying firm web site. Also on the Solyndra account at Washington Tax Group LLC was Jan Fowler, whose Capitol Hill experience came as an aide to another Republican, Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;In other words, rather than simply attacking the Democrats for shoveling taxpayer money into a solar energy company that eventually failed, the Republicans might ask themselves how so many of their own former public servants wound up on the company’s payroll, and why so many of their own senators and President Bush backed the law that created the loan guarantee program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Companies make donations all the time. Good for them. The billions pumped into Washington by big oil and big nuclear leave those of the alternative energy or solar industry in the dust. Hard for the alternative energy sector to get any love or attention in Washington when they are up against the big money of the oil and nuclear energy industries. Those two big industries outspend (mostly with Republicans) the alternative energy sector a thousand times over.</p>
<p>Why have there been no charges laid or any real claims of corruption, given this Solyndra transaction has been looked at with great detail by Republicans? Nothing really has come out of this.</p>
<p>Not sure what the point of your article really is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559248</guid>
		<description>I was wondering that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559246</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559246</guid>
		<description>I miss them too.and also some others.maybe they will come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss them too.and also some others.maybe they will come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/64513/dueling-solyndra/#comment-1559244</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/?p=64513#comment-1559244</guid>
		<description>ROFLMAO!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFLMAO!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

