Comments on: Gingrich Going Down

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:34:00 +0000

Sanctuary Cities, aka cesspools IMO are all over the country not just the coasts. But some evidently don’t know that and simply attack my part of the country for no good reason. It’s why I usually just collapse any comment from said person. And will make sure to do so from now on. Just wanted to clarify for the feebleminded.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:27:00 +0000

No they think that if they repeat their bs enough they can make it come true. And all too often this tactic works. That’s what happens when people don’t bother to educate themselves on the issues but preen themselves on a “talking point” education.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:19:00 +0000

Perhaps in your alternative universe Turbo Tax Timmy is a Republican, but in ours he’s a Democrat.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_timothy_geithner_a_democrat_or_republican

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:16:00 +0000

From reading your comments here, I was of the opinion that you were “better” than those who simply use ad hominem attacks. Since I think you are better than that I was a bit disappointed that you would attempt to excuse it.

If there are legitimate concerns or issues, fire away. But the kinds of b.s. that people like “guest” spew isn’t worth the time and effort we spend on them. JMO.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:48:00 +0000

No, I have not. Gingrich, in my opinion, lives under satanic attack and manifests this in his words and actions.

Romney is only marginally better, but I question whether or not his skill set is optimal to lead the nation, in consideration of the struggles we are to face.

His choice of foreign policy advisors rules him out for serious consideration, IMHO.

But Gingrich has been off my card for months now, because he’s possibly the only candidate less qualified to be president, than Barack Obama.

That’s why I’ve chosen to support Dr. Paul, but you don’t see me ridiculing the choices others have made, or demonizing Romney.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Your comment could have been from an Obama supporter to a Hillary supporter.

That causes your preferred candidate to eventually be despised, rather than just rejected for the voter’s own personal reasons.

Look BEYOND the election. Regardless of who prevails, we still have to live together in what’s left of this country, afterward.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:37:00 +0000

Oh, okay…I’ll just turn my back on everything I believe in, and know, just to vote for the most psychotically “New World Order” candidate, who positively radiates evil, just to comply with the wishes of strangers, and pollsters.

Ten months prior to the election.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:32:00 +0000

I guess, if the main focus is beating Obama just for the sake of beating him, or if you believe the economy is the most pressing issue, it’s easier to choose Tide or Wisk and make the best of a bad lot.

I think both Obama and the economy are symptoms, rather than the causes, of our woes, so I just see a unique opportunity to choose a different path, that I think would guide us back to a very original track.

I just don’t think candidates like Dr. Paul come along very often, in terms of integrity and consistency.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:32:00 +0000

I just don’t think candidates like Dr. Paul come along very often, in terms of integrity and consistency.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:23:00 +0000

You don’t have to listen to it now, you know.

It’s so easy to just accept that everyone owns their vote, and let them come to their conclusions on their own, without belittiling them in the interim.

Just saying.

By: Juliezzz

Juliezzz — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:27:00 +0000

yeah and in the debate they all kept saying “I agree with Paul.” and “Paul is right about that.” so…yeah why not go with the guy who is continually right.

By: Tequila81618

Tequila81618 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:15:00 +0000

Romney endorsed by 72 of the most corrupt Congress people in the history of the US?

Well, those endorsements sure say a mouthful… don’t they!

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:21:00 +0000

If not for those of us in ”cesspools” on both coasts, our creativity and industry and the considerable tax burden we shoulder, the Midwest would not just be “the Rust Belt”, but a third world hellhole.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:19:00 +0000

Forced deportation is necessary because illegal immigration and unsecured borders are this nation’s greatest national security challenge, and you don’t just let criminals decide when and how they “deport themselves”.

By: Scottymac54

Scottymac54 — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:09:00 +0000

Why accept substitutes?

None of the other candidates offers anything but the same old lies.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:42:00 +0000

She had previously threatened to release information gathered during the investigations of Newt when he was Speaker. She had to backpedal when it was pointed out to her that it would be against House rules to do so and she could be removed from her seat for doing so. She could release the information, but only if she wants to lose her job and the perks that go with it. No way is Nancy going to put the good of the country over her own interests.