RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Another Visit with “Ulsterman” and “White House Insider”

A few months ago, I wrote a series of articles (you’ll find the links below) about a blogger who calls himself “Ulsterman,” and a recurring feature of his blog, interviews with a mysterious long-time Democratic operative, known only as “White House Insider.”  WHI pops up every few weeks on Ulsterman’s blog, sharing his latest insights as an anti-Obama Democrat who claims to be working closely with other old school Dems to prevent Obama from being re-elected.

As with anything in the blogosphere, there is no proof that WHI is a real person with the credentials and experiences he claims, and indeed he could be simply a literary device created by Ulsterman.  For that matter, we don’t know that Ulsterman is a real person either.  In fact, I may not be a real person myself.  Even my own wife, if she really exists, won’t tell me if I’m real!

At any rate, Ulsterman just published the first segment of his most recent interview with the Insider, and it was quite an eye-opener for me.  So I thought I should share it with you folks, in case you don’t read Ulsterman yourself, because you only read blogs that are written by real people, not figments of someone else’s imagination, like me.

OK, so here’s the latest from Ulsterman and WHI (link at end):  Insider claims the Obama Team is helping to create the rise and fall of these Republican challengers to Mitt Romney.  He calls it a “Pump and Dump,” and here Ulsterman (UM) gets schooled:

UM: What is…what is a “pump and dump”?

Insider: It’s old school politics.  A political tactic.  Been around since Jesus was a kid.  It’s – now you remember the “McCain the Campaign” thing, right?  How he was done then shot up in the polls outta nowhere.  Money started pouring in.  I know you gotta remember that.  A political pump and dump is a version of that…it’s the version.  The McCain thing was a bit of a variation but the principle is exactly the same.

UM: And what is the principle?  The purpose?

Insider: Chaos.  Uncertainty.  Infighting.  Repress the vote.  You notice the stories about low voter turnout?  You see that happening?  That’s gotta be makin’ the Obama people very-very happy.  Godd–mn Republicans are losing this thing.  Idiots gonna lose this if they don’t get their sh-t together right quick now.

UM: What low turnout?

Insider: You ain’t seen those stories?

UM: No.

Insider: Well of course not.  See there – that’s the kind of  thing I’m talkin’ about here.  You’re too busy copying the other damn fools in helping with the pump and dump.  God—mit!

UM: Explain the numbers – the low turnout.  What are you talking about there?

Insider: The primary votes – the turnout.  They started strong…been trailing off badly more recently.  People are getting…the motivation has been turned off.  That’s one of the benefits of the pump and dump.  Now you combine that with the bullsh-t stories on the economy and you lower the agitation in the country.  And when folks ain’t pissed…the tie goes to the incumbent.  That’s the end result.  That’s what the Obama team is playin’ for now.  The tie goes to the incumbent.

Well, I’ll certainly go along with that last statement.  There are several truisms about the advantages of incumbency.  We don’t usually change presidents during a war.  We tend to vote for the “devil we know,” when we’re undecided.  The tie goes to the incumbent.  I can’t argue with that.  In this case, I wish like hell it wasn’t the case, but WHI is right on this one, IMO.  It’s got me very worried.  I’ve even started biting my nails!

Having said that…

The position that WHI is taking is different than what we have been doing here at NQ.  I am presenting it only as food for thought, not as a proclamation that we have been wrong to expose and ridicule some of the Republican field of candidates.  It may be that we are helping Obama’s campaign, as WHI suggests, when we trash Republican candidates we don’t like.  One of them may end up as the Republican nominee, or his running mate.

He’s making the point that those who oppose Obama’s re-election should make Obama the focus of our criticisms, not the Republican candidates.

I disagree on this issue, although I see his point.  This is No Quarter USA, not a dedicated Republican blog.  We call ‘em as we see ‘em, not kowtowing to either party.

Now, jumping ahead a little bit in the interview segment, WHI tells UM a few specifics:

UM: Back to the pump and dump…are you saying the Santorum surge – let’s call it that…the surge was manipulated?

Insider: Yeah. That’s what I’m sayin’.

UM: Just like that?  None of his support is genuine?

Insider: No…not sayin’ that.  He’s got support.  Real support.  They all do.  But to go from nothin’ to something…it was the same thing with McCain, right?  I see their hands all over it…they done the same with all the others.  Gingrich.  Cain.  The only one they didn’t touch like that…didn’t try and help was Perry.  Perry scared ‘em.  Perry was a threat.  That is, until he took himself out of it.  They didn’t need to do anything to Perry…that situation resolved itself.

UM: So the Santorum surge – just to be clear…it’s a manipulation?  At least in part?

Insider: Exactly.  And not to take anything away from Rick Santorum – as a candidate he’s done all right.  He’s hung in there.  He’s tried to line himself up for a VP spot.  That’s now turned into…you can see it in his eyes now – he’s got that look that a candidate gets…starts thinkin’ maybe he can actually pull this off.  Might just get himself the nomination.

UM: Ok – you say it’s being done.  Explain how.  How are the Obama people manipulating Santorum’s support.  And why?  Why are they doing that?

Insider: It’s what was done with Gingrich.  Gingrich was elevated quickly, right?  Then the attacks came. The media repeated over and over again how the attacks came from Romney.  The negative advertising and all that.  Sure…some of that was right.  But what the media don’t say…and what idiots like you apparently don’t notice – is all the negative MEDIA stories that are then bounced around 24/7 to push Gingrich back down.  So if you got a bunch of voters…conservative voters…they are not so keen on Romney…they’d vote for him against Obama if they had to, but they would rather have a different choice, right?  Well that…that lack of enthusiasm…that’s gold for the opposition.  That’s power.  You can manipulate that.

Well, we’ve certainly been seeing a LOT of that manipulation, haven’t we?  The mainstream media has been having a field day bouncing the Republican field off the walls!  And I think we all know whose side the MEDIA takes!

Now listen as he explains how political operatives set up situations they can manipulate and exploit, without most people having a clue.  Possible?  You betcha!  Likely?  I’d take that bet!

Insider: There was a debate not so far back – Republican debate.  And the moderator kept hammerin’ away on the contraception issue.  And there was no contraception issue at that time, right?  Contraception?  Really?  Where the hell did that come from?  And why did that moderator keep at it like he did?  Repeatedly.  It came off like a joke.  People were sayin’ how stupid it was.  How silly the media looked.  You remember that?

UM: I do.  Stephanopoulos, right?  He was the moderator who kept bringing up the issue?

Insider: That’s right, George was pushing it.  F-cking George.  He is so transparent.  I saw it immediately.  Telegraphed it.  I knew the second I saw his face as he asked the question – I KNEW they were setting something up.  Not then – something for later.  And now we see that plan unfolding.  This false contraception boogie man issue.

Now that debate was over two months ago.  And the issue of contraception, which seemed totally out of left field when it was raised during that debate – totally out of place…what is going on now?  What is the media pounding on now?

UM: Contraception.

Insider: That’s right – contraception.   It started out with a conflict between the Obama administration and the Catholic Church – but sure as sh-t the Obama team and the media have turned it into an issue over contraception and are painting the Republicans as these out of touch Bible thumpin’ radicals who want to take away women’s birth control.  That is how this thing is being framed  NOW – and it’s exactly how Stephanopoulos framed the question THEN over two months ago.  This issue was being set up the whole time.  And did you notice who was involved in the debate question first?  What candidate?

UM: Santorum.  Damn…it was Santorum.

Insider: Ah – there’s your light bulb moment for the day!  Now you’re seein’ it!  Back then – at that time two months ago, it seemed like they were going after Romney right?  But what candidate – who it would seem is most vulnerable to the contraception issue…what candidate has seen a huge surge in support since that same debate where the seemingly silly and out of place topic of contraception was raised by a former Clinton operative mind you…what candidate is now posing perhaps the strongest challenge yet to Mitt Romney for the GOP nomination?

UM: Santorum.

Insider:  And what candidate is most vulnerable to this bullsh-t contraception issue – at least in how the Democrats and the media are now framing it?

UM: Santorum.

Insider: There you go.  Classic political pump and dump.

Does any of this ring true for you?  It certainly rings true for me, and I can’t deny I am feeling “schooled” right now by someone who I think knows a lot more about these things than I do!  Of course, I’m probably not a real person, so what do I know?

I could leave it right there and we’d all have plenty to think about, but I feel I must share another segment with you to complete this issue.  WHI has a rant he needs to vent on the subject of losing focus, taking your eye off the ball, so to speak.  All the in-fighting instead of putting the laser on the real target.

Insider: I’ve read the comments by people sayin’ they are conservative.  If Romney gets the nomination…or if Gingrich gets the nomination…or if Santorum gets the nomination…whoever gets the f-cking nomination – they are sayin’ they won’t vote for them because “they’re just like Obama.”  Really?  Is that right?  BULLSH-T.  There ain’t nobody “just like Obama” people.  Believe me.  You ain’t got a f-cking clue if that’s what you really think.  This country ain’t seen anybody reach the White House like Obama.  Or more importantly – the people around Obama.  The ones supporting and pushing Obama.  Giving him the agenda, the words, the whole f-cking plan.  So shut the hell up about not voting for the Republican because they are “just like Obama.”  That kind of talk is comin’ from somebody who either is dumb as f-ck or is working for the campaign.  The Obama campaign.  And they are crawling all over your stupid Facebook thing.  And leaving comments on your stories.  I warned you about that.  There’s gonna be more of it.  A lot more.  You hear somebody saying they won’t support the Republican because they are ”just like Obama” – you ignore that sh-t.  It  ain’t worth your time.

Any of these Republicans – ANY OF THEM, are a hell of an improvement over Barack Obama.  If it’s Santorum, or Romney, or Gingrich, or Paul…you fall in line and you support that candidate and you vote Obama the f-ck out.  That’s the goal.  That’s your motivation.  PERIOD.  Because if you don’t do that…if you give this administration four more years…I’ve already said enough on that, right?  It’s never going back…the country…this version of America is finished and I got no real idea as to how different it’s gonna be.  We won’t recognize it – I know that.  I was talking to a fella last week about the Senate…plans to take the Senate.  Republicans.  As a stop-gap, right?  You know what he told me?  Looked me straight in the eye and said – “It won’t matter.  He has pushed executive authority so far already…it won’t matter.  Give him a couple more Supreme Court nominees…it won’t matter.  If he gets the White House again…IT WON’T MATTER.”

Gave me chills to hear that.  This guy don’t talk like that.  He’s seen and done more than me with this stuff…and he sounded downright defeated.  And we’re not even in March yet.  So yeah - you Republicans better fall in line when that nominee is chosen.  No more of this political purity I want the perfect candidate nonsense. Grow the f-ck up and vote out Obama.

Oh-keeeeeeey!  I think he means it!

But the task is not just up to the Republicans.  If that’s all it took, they’d probably get the vote out and beat BO.  But they can’t do it alone.  They need the Indies, but the Indies split both left and right.  So they also need disaffected Dems – the opposition Dems.

WHI claims that there are many traditional Democrats who are highly motivated to keep Obama from winning another term, because Obama isn’t really one of them.  Not really a Democrat, certainly not a Republican, but something else entirely, something dangerous to our country.  This is not “birther” stuff, not Muslim stuff, and definitely not racial stuff.  It’s about the group of people who surround and control Obama, who have taken over the Democratic Party through thuggery and illicit financial means…  in other words, The Chicago Way.

In the interest of full disclosure, I personally relate to WHI, even though I’ve always been an Indie.  I would say that I’ve felt closer to the Democratic Party most of my life, starting with JFK and most recently with Hillary Clinton, so I’m definitely not a Republican.  I agree with WHI that Obama and his organization are something else entirely from the traditional Democratic Party.   I agree with WHI that the current Democratic coalition must be defeated if the Democratic Party is to be saved as a legitimate and rational political party.  I agree we all need to work together — Republicans, Indies, estranged Dems — to defeat Obama in order to prevent further damage to our country.

If there was an overt split in the Democratic Party, Traditionals vs Obamists, I’d probably register with the Traditionals.  But since there is no overt split, no challenger to Obama in this election, there is only one way to oust Obama, and that is to vote for the Republican nominee, whoever it might be.

Ah, but do we have the intestinal fortitude to actually cast the vote for someone who makes us sick to our stomachs?

I think it’s like the issue of getting old.  Beats the alternative!


Source link: The Ulsterman Report: White House Insider “Pump and Dump”

Related links:  These are some other Ulsterman/Insider stories I previously published here at No Quarter USA

Hoax or Deep Throat?

On September 1, 2011, I wrote in my first piece about these interviews:

It’s very tempting to think this White House Insider is very real, another Deep Throat.  As you’ll recall, Deep Throat was the code name of the person supplying the information that led to Richard Nixon resigning as President. For over 30 years, Deep Throat’s identity remained a secret that Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward kept to himself, even from his own family. Deep Throat had secured that promise of secrecy, allowing Woodward to reveal it after DT died. During those three decades, there was much speculation about whether DT was actually one person or a composite of different people. As it turned out, it was a real person, Mark Felt, who was the #2 man at the FBI at the time of the Watergate affair.

The Obama Re-election Strategy

INSIDER:  “Even if it means the threat of race riots.  They are willing to go that far – go down that road if need be.  If the Obama team can’t guilt enough of White America into voting for them in 2012 – they are just fine with trying to scare the sh*t out of them to do it.  And you need to know that there are a lot of Democrats who are hearing about this and are not on board.  We’ve always used the race issue to our advantage – but what the Obama team has planned is something…it’s something else altogether.  Off the charts stuff.

“Remember when I said that Obama ain’t no Democrat?  That’s as true now as it’s ever been.  And he’s on some kind of collision course now with everybody scrambling to get out of the way, and then some of us trying to do what we can to stop it before it’s too late.”

The Real Barack Obama

INSIDER:  “A large leather chair will be facing the television – it’s well worn.  Not part of the White House furnishings but something the president must have brought in from back home.  That’s where you’ll most often find the President of the United States – the most powerful man in the free f***ing world.  He often sits with one leg draped over one of the chair’s arms and the other leg stuck straight onto the floor.  Shorts, sweats, a t-shirt, and like I said, no shoes or just those sandal things that so many of the younger people like to wear these days.  And that leg that’s draped over an arm of the chair will be bopping up and down, like…like someone with  a lot of nervous energy.  Like a kid does.”

Defeating Obama – A 3-Step Plan

INSIDER:  “What I will say is that those are two of the three tactics we are engaging in against Barack Obama’s re-election – continuing to push Eric Holder out of the DOJ, securing a primary challenger, and the other thing…it relates to a staffing issue.  The loss of a critical member of the Obama staff.  A resignation that will further the growing perception that the Obama White House is a place of internal disarray– which it absolutely is. And this event will also be a signal to those in the Democratic Party that Barack Obama’s re-election is not in their best future interests.  It is time we cut our losses and begin the rebuilding process sooner rather than later. And I’m not just talking about the Democratic Party – I’m talking about the country.  All of us.  All of us need to correct this mistake, and that’s what the election of Barack Obama was.  At its core, that’s what it really was – a huge mistake.

…But we’re makin’ it right.”

  • Anonymous

     Do we have the intestinal fortitude to actually cast the vote for someone who makes us sick to our stomachs?

    I don’t know if I do Steve. I just don’t know.

    In the meantime I can at least take some comfort in that I never claimed, or believed, that any of the Republican candidates were just like Obama or Obama-lite. Always thought that was just plain foolish.

    Obama and the Obamamedia, the Obamacrats and the Obama-thugs are something quite different, IMO, from the usual corrupt and corruptible political scum.

    Once the media became press agents for Obama our democracy was in danger. Their job is to “report” not support. Their job is to inform not propagandize.

    So for me, no matter what UM or WHI say, the worst danger we face is not from Obama, mediocre little worm that he is, but from the JournOlist types who have betrayed every bit of journalistic integrity.

    We are losing our country because of ABC, CBS and NBC. And the scummy likes of them in the print media.

    • Anonymous

      Yup! ABO! ABO! ABO!

      • Anonymous

        test test

        • Anonymous

          It passed?

    • Anonymous

      “We are losing our country because of ABC, CBS and NBC. And the scummy likes of them in the print media.”
      Dead on right Marge *(because I grew up on Great Lakes water not far from  you at about the same latitude I feel I can call you Marge).
      But it is worse than individual journalists. We know FOX is Murdoch but no one points out the giant corporations behind all the others. And to follow Steve’s discourse, why do  we get a constant drumbeat that Obama is a Socialist? I believe it is because hw is EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE. He is a corporatist – a tool of the large corporations.
      Remember when there were Department stores with different ownership?
      Remember when the big shopping centers weren’t all owned by Westfield?
      Remember when the supermarkets were actually different chains and not owned together by the same group?
      We are being taken over by monopolies.
      And the spin on Obamacare is that it is Socialist when it is actually a requirement of every person to purchase from big Health Insurance.
      So just like the idea of painting “Obama Lite” on every Republican to destroy them, I believe the Obama Dems are behind the “Socialist” meme to placate their far left and to cover up his true agenda which is exactly the opposite.

      • Anonymous

        Well said Ellen!!

      • Anonymous

        Yes, EllenD818–but just ask yourself who owns GM really?

        • Anonymous

          The US Treasury is now down to 33/36% percent after the reorganization so it is the shareholders but you have made my point. Government (our) money isn’t used to take over companies by the government (which would be Socialism) but to give these big corporations – like the banks – free loans.

          • Anonymous

            Now really, Ellen, when the government also in a sense gave GM back to the UNION.  It’s a bait and switch type thing.  Now go back to the recent post of a video that HELENK2 put up.  It gives a good idea of how the Unions, OWS, ACORN, etc. can become as a sort of second wave the armies of the socialistic/communistic leaders.  They won’t mess with the military until after they get their “workers’ armies” in place.

            So I don’t worry about the semantics–corporate or socialism, who cares?  It’s the ultimate goal and effect that worries me.

            They can call me a conspiracy theorist, a whacko, whatever.  I’d rather be safe than sorry.  So I’ll keep worrying and watching.

            My ancestors were the “kulaks” that the Russian bolshevik mobs came after becuse they had spent over a century building up the Volga Valley and the steppes above the Black Sea into what was became the bread basket of the world at the time.  They were not rich by any means, but their farms were confiscated, they were called “rich” and sent to Siberia, while Stalin then experimented with farm “co-ops” using people from the cities who knew NOTHING about farming and then, when that didn’t work out, farm “factories.”  It resulted in two terrible famines ten years apart, with millions dying.

            My immediate forebears got out of Russia just in time.  It happened very fast when it happened.

            • Anonymous

               Well apparently the Canadian and Ontario governments are shareholders along with the Union and whoever came aboard with the recent IPO so I don’t see this as a Union or Socialist takeover.
              My husband’s forbears got our of Russia in time too. They were called Jews.

    • Anonymous

      Blame the Media…. another easy cop-out…!  Only Obama haters, conservatives and Republicans constantly blame the Media. Such nosense and it is getting old.

      • Anonymous

        First PPAA insists, “Only Obama haters, conservatives and Republicans constantly blame the Media”…

        …and then blames the media, “The media is largely run by large conservative corporations”…

        FAIL

        • Anonymous

           Progressive logic

          • Anonymous

            There’s an oxymoron for ya!

        • Anonymous

          “…and then blames the media, “The media is largely run by large conservative corporations”…”

          You need some better reading comprehension. What exactly am I complaining about the Media about?I am not blaming the media for anything. I could care less what the Media says. I am saying that for those on the right complaining, as Kenosha does above, not to forget that a big part of the Media is run by large conservative corporations and the right, conservatives and the Republican Party have their own network (FOX). Where exactly is my complaining?

          • Anonymous

             ”I am not blaming the media for anything. I could care less what the Media says”…

            …”You have the largest hate Obama and Republican propaganda media in the world and it is known as FOX and Newscorp.”

            FAIL II

      • Anonymous

        the largest hate Obama and Republican propaganda media in the world and it is known as FOX and Newscorp.

        Yet the majority of News Corp’s political donations have gone to Democrats, and Barack Obama received more of their donations than any other political candidate.

        Why do you think that is, PPAA?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1429578258 Cerry H Klaver

        You just don’t get it, do you?  The problem is media monopoly.  Your qualifier of “conservative” (fundie) is irrelevant at this point.  
        This is the biggest problem I have with Obama supporters.  You don’t get that Obama is laying down the foundation, setting the precedent, for the ultimate take-over of monopolistic corporate behavior.  And he’s doing it with hardly any real criticism by the media.  His Flip-flopping on FISA, cutting 2.5% of SS withholding from our paychecks in the guise of a payroll tax deduction, increasing executive power to a degree that even the NYT commented on today supercedes previous use by other administrations to suppress whistle-blowers, no change on the Biden-sponsored bankruptcy bill allowing among other things the ability for employers to hire based on credit reports, etc.  And let’s not forget the inability of a person to have their student loans forgiven during bankruptcy.  While Obama hangs out the fruits of social issues, he makes you forget about the economic issues.  And more party-unaffiliated Obama-like pols are getting elected because they are presumed to be Dems when in reality they are New Dems — those with the right stances on social issues while they sell out the foundation of our economic power as workers.In a nutshell, Obama supporters are so oblivious to this one fact of life, that has been repeated throughout history time and again:  Once the employer (corporation, landowner, whoever) controls your livelihood social issues cease to matter.  A starving desperate person is far more likely to sell out his social issues to get some bread.Also, I’m dying to have you explain what you mean by “Obama hater” since you never provide any facts as to what constitutes “hate”.  You, yourself, keep claiming that you are a facts person, but you throw out labels of hate when it is easily convenient to your argument and in short when you have no fact, any descriptor, to present.

        Criticizing Obama is not hate.  It is the fundamental action of committing to this act in regards to our leaders:  ”Question Authority”.

    • Anonymous

       Don’t forget Fox. They hate Romney as well and have their own agenda. About the only real journalist left is Bob Schieffer.

      • Anonymous

        Agree about FOX. But I was just listing the 3 major networks where the majority of people get their “news”. As for Schieffer, we’ll have to agree to disagree. IMO he’s a devout member of the Obamamedia. Can’t stand the hypocrite myself.

  • Anonymous

    “Insider claims the Obama Team is helping to create the rise and fall of these Republican challengers to Mitt Romney.”

    So all those Republican primary voters are being brainwashed by the WH in supporting the different Republican primary candidates? Where do you get this stuff? Blame the WH for the GOP primaries. That is funny, but not suprising from you Steve and your Internet sources.

    I love the way you preference your comment by saying:

    “ As with anything in the blogosphere, there is no proof that WHI is a real person with the credentials and experiences he claims, and indeed he could be simply a literary device created by Ulsterman.”

    and then you go an post and promote this article and lend it your credibility…   classic NQ.

    How about a little more quality on NQ, rather than this BS?

    The conservative echo chamber is alive and well. Some nut posts a piece then Steve “the Moderate” reposts it and gives it his and NQ’s credibility and then wash and re-wash… again and again.

    There is no substance to this article. No actual proof of anything

    This article gets a big tinfoil hat.

    • Anonymous

       Politico posts items with no proof, the MSM runs with polls that are weighted for Demo’s, employment numbers that are fixed and on and on it goes.  You Liberals are so transparent with no depth, completely shallow and fu-ked-up

    • Anonymous

       If perhaps you took a minute to take the head out of your ass you would realize that several readers here disagree with the premise of this piece. Idiot!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1429578258 Cerry H Klaver

      It is COMMON for voters to switch parties during primaries to vote for “underdog” candidates or ones who help the candidate of their party win.  It’s a  S-T-R-A-T-E-G-Y.  Some call it “cross-voting”.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1429578258 Cerry H Klaver
  • Anonymous

    Just to be clear – do you think the “Insider” is a real person, or not? Are the things he says being presented as fact, or as a literary device for the “interviewer’s” personal opinions and hunches?

    • Anonymous

       My guess is the WH1 is not a real person, but more likely a variety of “sources” that this blogger attempts to use and consolidates into one narrative.

      As for the “pump and dump”  that is how the nominating system is playing out.  Not so much a part of a great master plan.  The Obama team has had one simple strategy, weaken Mitt Romney at every turn (he is the one candidate they think can defeat him).  By running ads against Romney and having some of their friendly PACS do the same,  it helps feed those Republicans who want anyone but Romney.

      Larry Johnson is not part of any Obama conspiracy,  but you show him Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum etc., he is going to point out their inadequacies, as is anyone else who can do a slight bit of research and add some perspective.  These candidates are rising then falling on their own merits or lack thereof.

      At the end of the day it is all about Romney.  He is an offspring of the once proud Rockefeller/Romney wing of the Republican Party.  A right of center party that was closer to the center than the extreme right.  But instead of fighting for the soul of his party as who he is, Romney keeps trying to pretend he is something he is not.  He is pandering to the tea party and as he does that, he turns off those he should be attracting while trying to get votes he is never going to get.

      This disaster is Mitt Romney’s making, not the White House’s.

      • Anonymous

         I hear you Warrior, but I do think that the media plays a huge part in the portrayal of Romney.  For instance, he had just won one of the caucuses, and the guy on the radio from CBS was interviewing someone who said that Romney was a weak candidate and he was lucky to win.  How about interviewing someone who is solidly behind Romney, instead of this jerk.  The media can spin things any way they want, and if they want to constantly make someone look bad, they do it.  It’s hard to fight all the negativity-just ask Hillary.

        • Anonymous

          Absolutely beachnan. No matter what Romney says or does it’s either portrayed as bad or it’s damned with faint praise.

          With a media that never stops supporting the POS in the White House and never misses a chance to smear Romney it’s a wonder he’s even still on his feet.

          Obama meanwhile has the presstitutes acting as his press agents. Wonder how he would do on a level playing field.

        • Anonymous

           The media are simplistic and lazy, but they just perpetuate the stories that sell papers, hold viewers or generate web links.  They also tried to present Romney as the candidate of inevitability, gave him the nomination after New Hampshire etc.   Gave him the nomination again after Florida.  Those story lines did not stick.  They are as surprised by Santorum as anyone else.

          This is the Republican primary.  You are appealing to a group of voters that believe the media (outside of Fox) is a group of North Eastern college graduated liberal weenies.  They should have minimal effect on the voting. 

          The problem is Romney. 

          • Anonymous

             Yet Fox has been anti-Romney as well. So it ain’t just the libs and there ain’t much Romney can do about that.

          • Anonymous

             Still can’t agree with you.  Remember how many times the media portrayed Obama as the inevitable winner, and how much is pissed off all us-Hillary supporters.  It just made me want to work harder for Hillary.  I also think with Ronmey, we can factor in the biased Christians that don’t like the Mormon religion.  I think it may be a little Romney and lot more the media and Christian bias.

        • Anonymous

           

          The media can spin things any way they want, and if they want to
          constantly make someone look bad, they do it.  It’s hard to fight all
          the negativity-just ask Hillary.

          Exactly!

      • Anonymous

         But I don’t see any other way for Romney to get the nomination. Do you?

        • Anonymous

          Romney still has a solid core of support, plus the most money and organization. He is best suited to win the battle over the long haul. Santorum’s rise is already cresting. The issue is that if Paul and Santorum along with Gingrich continue to accumulate delegates, it may be hard for Romney under the new rules to have enough delegates to secure the nomination before the convention. If that happens, all bets are off.

        • Anonymous

          Romney still has a solid core of support, plus the most money and organization. He is best suited to win the battle over the long haul. Santorum’s rise is already cresting. The issue is that if Paul and Santorum along with Gingrich continue to accumulate delegates, it may be hard for Romney under the new rules to have enough delegates to secure the nomination before the convention. If that happens, all bets are off.

    • Anonymous

       Some of it is like a bad acid trip. Saying the Dems were afraid of Perry? Give me a break.

      • Roger Elder

        Perry has the capacity to deliver a vision that can resonate with regular America. So does Palin… and yes the democrats are afraid of both of these folks. Romney not so much apparently. Honestly, I don’t know anybody personally that cares if we ever had an Olympics in Utah or for that matter… if we have the Olympics ever again. I know I don’t. I know a lot of folks worried right now about keeping their homes, having a decent job and whether their kids will grow up to have a lifestyle anywhere close to the one we HAD. If Perry was where Romney has been all this time we wouldn’t be seeing these manufactured front runner changes among republicans. This elevation and destruction of republican front runners has been media driven and yes most of the folks here did play right into it… which is why many of the folks here left.. out of the futility from it all. Which just goes to show the demoralization tactic is working. Just my opinion FWIW.

        • Anonymous

           Sorry, but I made up my own mind about Perry.  He stumbled all over that one himself and deserved what he got.   Secondly, I admired Palin, but I have never thought she was presidential material.  For a while, this blog went hog wild over her.  I didn’t agree.  Remember when everyone wanted to have a beer with Bush.  This was before he was elected and that was one of the reasons people said they liked him.  They were comfortable with him.  So what?  This doesn’t make someone a great President.   Bush didn’t turn out so well and I put Perry and Palin in the same category.  This may sound crazy, but I want to be impressed by their leadership.  I want to be impressed by their ability to get things done.  I want to be impressed that they can talk with other leaders of the world and hold their own. I want to be impressed by the person who is President, I don’t want to go and have a beer with them.

        • Anonymous

           Perry might have the capacity to deliver a vision but when given that opportunity he didn’t deliver. He fell flat on his own accord as was obvious in the debates. To blame Romney for this is hilarious.

      • Roger Elder

        Perry has the capacity to deliver a vision that can resonate with regular America. So does Palin… and yes the democrats are afraid of both of these folks. Romney not so much apparently. Honestly, I don’t know anybody personally that cares if we ever had an Olympics in Utah or for that matter… if we have the Olympics ever again. I know I don’t. I know a lot of folks worried right now about keeping their homes, having a decent job and whether their kids will grow up to have a lifestyle anywhere close to the one we HAD. If Perry was where Romney has been all this time we wouldn’t be seeing these manufactured front runner changes among republicans. This elevation and destruction of republican front runners has been media driven and yes most of the folks here did play right into it… which is why many of the folks here left.. out of the futility from it all. Which just goes to show the demoralization tactic is working. Just my opinion FWIW.

  • Anonymous
    • Anonymous

      HELENK2 and Steve in KC—I am sure loving these reports.  I won’t be judging whether there is a real insider or a real Ulsterman.  But I trust LJ to let only REAL people post on his site, so I think you can tell your wife you’re real, Steve.

      This second part posted by HELENK2 includes a section where he predicts the heat on V Jarrett will start getting hotter, causing her to “sweat like a Fat Elvis.”  That image is going to give me chuckles all day!  Thanks!

      • Anonymous

        Actuallyt meant to say also, that given our lack of real records, we’re not even sure we have a “real” POTUS.

  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

    sounds like B.O and msm is running the Republican talking points.

  • Anonymous

    Well, it rings very true to me.  The Chaicago Way certainly pushed me out of the party in ’08. 

    At this point, they have a lot of “splainin to do” before I ever consider going back, too.

    So I think I am ready for ABO, and will just keep my fingers crossed that the Republicans have sense to nominate the strongest and BEST candidate.

    By the way, anyone see the thing about Rush’s supposed prediction that Ron Paul and Mitt Romney have an agreement of some type?

    • Anonymous

      And no sooner than I clicked the “post” button, and checked the thread to see if it worked, I noticed the usual PPAA slobber in the thread–twice as I was posting once.  This one must really strick a panic attack in his/her/its inners, causing his/her/it to soil his/her/its knickers.

      • Anonymous

        Never says anything worth reading so I just yawn and collapse.

        • Anonymous

          Agree, KenoshaMarge!

          I didn’t say I read what he/she/it posted, just noticed that the two I saw got there during the time I took to post.  I was implying a panic-stricken cut and paste job.

          • Anonymous

            Understand and agree.

          • Anonymous

            Understand and agree.

  • Anonymous
    • Anonymous

       Helen, I was so disappointed in O’Reilly the other night, when he started to go after the oil companies, instead of Obama for the higher prices.  Yes, we do export a lot of our oil, but didn’t everyone blame Bush when the prices went sky high.  These prices need to be laid at the feet of Obama.  He told us back in 2009, that he hoped the prices would go up, so that we would turn to alternate energy. The Republicans need to keep playing that snippet over and over again on television until everyone gets it.  I heard on the news the other day that we are producing 3.5 million gallons a day, and when Obama came into office, we were producing 5 million a day.  Tapping into our own resources will help us,  but Obama keeps putting the stops on moving forward in this area. 

      • Anonymous

         Not surprisingly Obama likes pond scum for a solution.

        • Anonymous

          Oh I thought he just like to drink pond scum.
           

          • Anonymous

            Well, sorry to say, I thought he was pond scum.

      • Anonymous

         Not surprisingly Obama likes pond scum for a solution.

  • Anonymous

    I liked your article Steve good job.

    Ulsterman may actually have come up with a good three word mantra to use in the general election.

    “VOTE OUT OBAMA”

    I heard Karl Rove said the other night that the Dems are running anti Romney ads in Michigan. The plot thickens.

    But the question is will this be to any avail if gas prices hit $5 this summer. Can Obama successfully cast blame for that on the Republicans. Or will he throw the environmentalists under the bus when things get tough.

    Its not time for any of us who want to see Obama defeated to lose
    hope for Change is in the Air. The Republican Mean Machine has yet to start its operations yet. We haven’t got candidate yet and its too early because you don’t want to peak too early. And remember most of the tactics WHI mentioned were perfected by the likes of Karl Rove. The Obama team only added a lot of high tech stuff to patrol the internet but how many people are there like us who actually blog and follow politics religiously.

    Many people dread the coming general campaign season. I say bring it on give us your best shot.

    “VOTE OUT OBAMA”

    • Anonymous

      “But the question is will this be to any avail if gas prices hit $5 this summer. Can Obama successfully cast blame for that on the Republicans. Or will he throw the environmentalists under the bus when things get tough.”

      If Americans had any sense, neither party would be able to get any traction out of gas prices, whether high or low. The price of gas is determined by GLOBAL supply and demand, and global supply and demand are not determined by American policy. As much as we’d like to think they are… they just aren’t.

      • Anonymous

        he’ll blame it on his tough stance against Iran.  and the media will go along.

        • Earl Stick

           Obama has no stance on anything.  His management style consists of “What should we do, Valerie?”

          Ms Jarrett is the de facto president.

      • Anonymous

         
        When we hit $5 not only will gas go up
        but every price on items like food, clothing, high tech gear, lumber
        and  any consumer product. All these must be transported and
        high costs will be passed on to the customer. This won’t matter much
        to the 1% but it will hurt the 99% big time. Then all you will have
        left is the rather pedantic argument left as you said,

        “ The price of gas is
        determined by GLOBAL supply and demand,

        and global supply and demand
        are not determined by American policy “

        And Republicans will reply but we
        wanted more domestic production to increase GLOBAL supplies thus
        lowering GLOBAL prices. All your administration gave us was Green
        Energy which does not work. And now we are paying $5 not only for gas
        but for a loaf of bread.

        This won’t help either:

        Hutchison said Energy Secretary
        Steven Chu’s 2008 comment that “Somehow, we have to figure out
        how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe,” shows
        that the Obama administration is not doing enough to lower gas
        prices. Chu was trying to make the case that higher gas prices would
        spur consumers to buy more fuel efficient vehicles.

        http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-25/obama-says-u-s-energy-strategy-must-include-more-than-drilling.html

        So good luck with convincing hard
        strapped Americans it wasn’t Obama’s fault.

    • Anonymous

      “But the question is will this be to any avail if gas prices hit $5 this summer. Can Obama successfully cast blame for that on the Republicans. Or will he throw the environmentalists under the bus when things get tough.”

      If Americans had any sense, neither party would be able to get any traction out of gas prices, whether high or low. The price of gas is determined by GLOBAL supply and demand, and global supply and demand are not determined by American policy. As much as we’d like to think they are… they just aren’t.

  • Anonymous

    this might be off topic
    what is backtrack’s plan to stop this
    trial for American hostages in Egypt starts Sunday.

    he did his best to get the muslim brotherhood in charge of Egypt,now what?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/world/middleeast/us-seeks-deal-for-americans-facing-charges-in-egypt.html?_r=1

  • Anonymous

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/us/politics/uaw-tries-to-help-obama-win-working-class-voters.html?_r=1

    UAW tries to help backtrack win working class voters.
    Didn’t they get stock in GM from the bailout?

    • Anonymous

       Like other major creditors (including the US Government), the UAW  received GM stock as a part of the company’s reorganization. In exchange for this, the union took over the company obligations to its retiree health plan, and agreed to substantial (30-50% in some plants) pay and benefit cuts. In the final analysis, the union took over approximately $38 billion in GM long-term debt in exchange for the stock, which is currently worth about $11 billion. Hardly a sweetheart deal for the union.

      It’s pretty common for companies to emerge from a Chap 11 reorg with major creditors owning almost all of the reorganized company.

  • Anonymous

    Its how things are perceived that counts. Cry all you want about the unfairness but in the end if its not the high gas prices it will be the increased food costs and other inflation in consumer good that matter to the voters. And the Republicans will play that issue up big time. We told you we needed to increase oil production and you gave us green energy which doesn’t work. And no matter what you say the Obama administration has slowed down new production in the gulf and on the west coast, the Atlantic and in Colorado. The only area where we have improved oil production is in the Dakotas which being on private land Obama can not shut down. The 1% do not care but the remaining 99% will be hurt big time. 

    When gas hits $5 I predict even long time Dems will cry “Drill Baby Drill”.

  • Anonymous

    something that has  been under the radar
    vacancies for Inspector General positions

    http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/24/the-mystery-of-the-missing-igs/

  • Anonymous

    Its all pump and dump in my opinion…. The question is, who is playing whom for fools? This Ulsterman reeks of a political false flag.

    • Anonymous

      Popsmoke… I read Ulsterman’s blog fairly regularly.  He’s definitely on the political Right.  Much more than me, for sure.  I have freely left open the possibility that the the Insider is a literary device for Ulsterman, and if so, I admire Ulsterman’s writing, because the dialogue is pretty convincing, IMO. 

      • Anonymous

        Convincing and truth have two entirely different meanings.

        • Anonymous

          If the proof is in the pudding then it is more pump than dump.

          “the dialogue is pretty convincing”…
          That’s what Mark Twain said..
          Good read Steve_in_KC.

  • Anonymous

    Some of this seems real but most of it seems made up. Not all of the facts, the insider. I know I wouldn’t communicate even on a somewhat frequent basis with some condescending know it all that called me an idiot. Unless the blogger is an avowed masochist I just don’t buy it. But on to a few of the facts…

    It doesn’t surprise me in the least that the left is intentionally influencing this nomination process. It was Gingrich, after all, that started the from the left attack on Romney. And I remember reading somewhere that Gingrich had been fed the info from a Dem insider. So Gingrich is either unethical, stupid or gullible. Perhaps all three.

    The whole meme of “he’s just like Obama” is now coming from Santorum who is comparing Romney to the 99%. However the hell he came up with that I haven’t a clue. Perhaps Satan did it. Sure beats me. I can think of some much more entertaining things for Satan to do to Rickie the Non-Contraceptive Dick. Just sayin…

    I haven’t the slightest doubt that Stephie set up the contraception issue. Once a political operative always a political operative. Or is that hack? But it certainly seems as if the O team was testing the message. Romney has come out in the past few days lending credence to the Stephie/O alliance concerning the contraception issue.

    Like you, I am a former Democrat. I am not Republican either. I’m an Independent and I will make my mind up who to vote for without the guidance of any insider. I bought that vote for any Democrat over any Republican because they are so bad shit for decades. I won’t now vote for any Republican no matter who it is because of how bad the current Democrat asshole is either.

    Independent means that I will make up my own damned mind and vote for who I believe is best for our country. At his point I support Romney because he has a verifiable track record of leading and getting results. We haven’t had a president like that in a while. And I am certain we need one desperately.

    I can tell you with absolute certainty that I will not vote for either
    Gingrich or Santorum. No boogeyman excuse is going to sway me to embrace either of them. Gingrich because of what he did to our country when speaker. Santorum because he is a pompous holier than thou asshole. Of this current roundup of Republican candidates I could only vote for Paul if Romney falls. I disagree with some of his foreign policy ideas but at least feel confident that he isn’t giving me a line of BS to get elected. And even if it is BS, at least it’s consistent BS and I would know where I stood with him.

    Have you taken into consideration that this “insider” might be trying to pump and dump the interviewer and those willing to buy into the conspiracy theory? Not saying he or she is but it is worth questioning.

    I’ve been around the block long enough that I don’t need to be schooled by political insiders. To me, it’s just more spin. Maybe its nice spin, perhaps it even makes sense. But it is just spin. Fortunately I have a brain in my head and can make rational decisions on my own.

    • Anonymous

      I don’t know.  Some others have said this in the past, and I’m hesitant to repeat it.  However, to me this guy’s way of putting things seems to be similar to the way James Carville talks.  Carville was a big player in Hillary’s campaign.  Maybe I’m thinking more how I would react, but I can’t help but guess the things someone at Carville’s level had to endure from the Chicago team, along with NP’s, HR’s, and the DNC’s machinations may have made him angry.

      The high-level Hillary speakers at our county and state conventions and caucuses had to endure much also.  To my way of thinking, there could easily be a group that would like to see the Chicago team sent straight back to the streets of the Windy City.

      • Anonymous

        DianaLC, you beat me to the Carville possibility, but I was going to address FF’s comment about only a masochist would put up with the condescension and calling the interviewer an idiot.  What I would say to that is that, as an example, I take way worse crap than that from people without getting all thin-skinned about it.  Every day at work! 

        Now, if I was a in the shoes of Ulsterman, who may be a newspaper guy who lost his job like so many have, and he may have some connections that got him an exclusive with someone as high up the food chain as James Carville (just as an example), I think I’d take a lot of shit from a guy like that in exchange for having him as a regular connection.  I’ve dealt with a lot of well-placed folks who feel pretty comfortable dishing out epithets and attitude.  And as a humble blogger, I’d take a lot of abuse in exchange for a big connection, especially if it was exclusive!

  • ProudConservative

    I knew George’s contraception question was a set-up for Santorum.

    Obama and the Democrats FEAR Newt more!

    • Anonymous

      ProudConservative, you may be right on some levels, but I think they would dread Obama debating Newt more than running against him.  

      • Anonymous

         I agree with you Steve.  Gingrich is as thin skinned as Obama.  He just couldn’t help himself from whining  after his last debate in Florida.  When things are going well for Gingrich he seems okay, but when things don’t go well, he reminds me of Obama.  I think there are many former Dems out there, that would have a difficult time voting for Gingrich, but would have no problem voting for Romney.  Hate to say it, but I can’t see the US voting for the pudgy guy  and the wife, who was his mistress while married to his second wife.  A lot of women would have trouble with her being First Lady.

    • Anonymous

      ProudConservative, you may be right on some levels, but I think they would dread Obama debating Newt more than running against him.  

  • Anonymous

    Superb work, Steve.  We are plenty blessed that you are writing for No Quarter. — Bronwyn

    • Anonymous

      Thank you very much, Bronwyn!  And I’m plenty honored and pleased to be writing for NQ!

  • Anonymous

    By the way, you think Noot can’t be worse than Obama? Let me remind you that he proved he could careless for the Constitution when he walked over it with the Contract With America. Long before Obama even dreamed he would be able to…..

  • Anonymous

    By the way, you think Noot can’t be worse than Obama? Let me remind you that he proved he could careless for the Constitution when he walked over it with the Contract With America. Long before Obama even dreamed he would be able to…..

  • Anonymous

    We are so focused the republican primary circus and bombing Iran. That we missed this one….

    Russian official hints sub may have been armed in fire
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-russia-submarine-nucleartre81j11u-20120220,0,3249136.story

    For those that understand Russki…. 
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-h9R_CToBI
     

    • Anonymous

      saw that…

  • Anonymous
  • http://lesstalkmoreactivism.blogspot.com/ Anonymous

    “do we have the intestinal fortitude to actually cast the vote for someone who makes us sick to our stomachs?”

    I’m one of about 12 black democrats in the country who voted for McCain.  Yes, I have the intestinal fortitude and enough Pepto Bismol in the cabinet to vote for Obama if Santorum is the nominee.

    Republicans voting for Santorum in the primary clearly don’t buy this ‘Obama Agenda’ stuff or that Obama ’12 is the end of the world.  If they did, electability would drive their votes.  Instead, they vote for the guy trying to turn “moderate” into a dirty word.  They see Obama as just another liberal democrat.  I see him as just a lousy President.   This ‘Obama Agenda’ stuff is failing to scare even the farthest right wing voters.  They’re not just saying in on Facebook.  They have said it in the voting booth.

    Romney needs to learn from this Santorum Surge–assuming he doesn’t chalk it up to Axelrod’s mysterious superpowers.  I remember only one line from Bill Clinton’s convention speech:  ’We Can Do Better.’  That’s what Romney has to prove.  He can’t run on some comic book sci-fi about the ‘Obama Agenda’ that doesn’t even sell in Colorado.  If that’s WHI’s advice, then WHI is really Axelrod.  ABO=OBA(MA).

    • Anonymous

      Well, I agree with much of what you say–except I’m from Colorado and I don’t like the implication that we’re gullible.

      Romney does need to keep pushing how he could do better.  I absolutely agree with you there.

      But as an ex-Dem, I am afraid of what Obama is pushing, too.

      And there were far more than 12 blacks who voted against Obama.  Please check out the We Shall Not Be Silenced Videos that you can still find on the net. 

      On this site there during the last primary and general election there were several commenters who were regulars and were upset with being called “Uncle Toms,” etc.

      But, again, I do think you are correct about Romney doing more to promote what HE can do better for our country.

    • Anonymous

      As an African American and one of the proud 5 per centers I too voted for McCain.  I will vote for any of the Reps maybe with the exception of Gringich to get rid of the Liar -in-Chief.