RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Progressives Win A Round — Waxman Ousts Dingell As Energy And Commerce Chair

nusaS: If you’re a new reader, I’d just like you to know that Charles Lemos wrote many favorable stories at his blog, and here, about John McCain before the election, and has been a contributor at No Quarter for nearly a year.
………………..

Who said progressives can’t win? By Jove, we won a big one today. In a victory for the left wing of the Democratic Party, Representative Henry Waxman of California has just successfully ousted Representative John Dingell of Michigan from his longtime perch as head of the Energy and Commerce Committee.

The downside, alas, is that we lose Representative Waxman’s careful and diligent probing of government oversteps. Few others have taken on Bush, Cheney et al with such vigor asking such candid questions. Since winning back control of the Congress, Representative Waxman has played a lead role in staking out a far more aggressive stance towards the Bush Administration than many other more cautious leaderships of the Democratic Party would take.

Congressman Waxman used his House Oversight chairmanship to grill the Administration on issues from the Attorney General scandals to Guantanamo to FEMA & the response to Katrina, making him a hero to the progressive left. Such competence should be rewarded.

According to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office the vote count in the Democratic Caucus was Waxman 137 votes, Dingell 122 votes.

The defeat of Dingell is also a major victory for environmentalists, removing a key obstacle to real energy reform and breaks a major link to corporate control of the Congress. Dingell, who first entered the House way back when Eisenhower was President, had been the head Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee since 1981. But many of the more liberal members over the years came to view him as too friendly to Michigan’s auto industry and hostile to environmentalists — especially on issues like climate change and carbon limits. Though to be fair and appreciative, Congressman Dingell has been a champion of universal health care throughout his 53 year Congressional career.

More from the New York Times:

Besides seating a committed environmentalist as head of the energy committee, the vote also removes one of the auto industry’s best friends from a key leadership post — further evidence of how much power the American car-makers, whose executives have been pleading for federal money, have lost in Congress.

The vote on Thursday morning reportedly surprised some Dingell supporters, who had expected Mr. Dingell to prevail despite Wednesday’s 25-to-22 vote by the Democrats’ Steering and Policy Committee in favor of Mr. Waxman’s challenge.

Mr. Dingell has been the top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce committee since 1981 and has been in Congress since 1955, having won his seat in a special election after his father died in office. In February, Mr. Dingell will become the longest-serving member in the history of the House.

Speaker Pelosi, who has often clashed with Mr. Dingell, particularly on environmental matters, leads the steering committee, which includes the entire House leadership. Ms. Pelosi backed a candidate who opposed Mr. Dingell in a Democratic primary in 2002, but she has remained officially neutral in the Dingell-Waxman brawl. The steering committee vote was conducted in secret.

The chairmanship of the Committee on Energy and Commerce is a key post, since the committee will handle legislation on climate change, energy and health care that President-elect Obama is hoping to move through the new Congress.

Mr. Waxman, who has been the chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, was backed by many environmentalists for his stands on clean air and global warming, and he has a long record of leadership on health care issues.

Environmental groups reacted swiftly and mostly positively to the ascension of Mr. Waxman. “Chairman Waxman has been a leader on global warming for many years, and we look forward to working closely with him in his new role,” said Karen Wayland, legislative director of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Mr. Dingell has also shepherded numerous environmental and health care bills through Congress in his decades of service. He has sponsored universal health care legislation in every session of Congress since he was first elected. Both men are considered hard-driving chairmen, but Mr. Waxman is generally regarded as more liberal than Mr. Dingell, and has sponsored tougher global warming legislation. Mr. Dingell’s backers argued, unsuccessfully, that he was more likely to knit together a broad coalition of labor, industry and environmentalists in fashioning a climate change bill.

Mr. Waxman, 69, ran a low-key campaign for the post, in part because his challenge upsets the seniority system in the House and in part because Mr. Dingell, at 82, has had a number of health problems, including recent knee-replacement surgery.

Mr. Waxman said through a spokesman on Wednesday that he was a better leader to push Mr. Obama’s agenda through Congress.

“I am running for the chairmanship of the Energy and Commerce Committee because we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to advance health care, achieve energy independence and tackle climate change,” he said in a statement. “These are difficult and contentious issues, and I believe I can provide effective leadership so that Congress and the new administration working together can deliver results for the American people.”

From my blog, By The Fault.

  • adagioforstrings

    I’m not comforted that a person who is unfriendly to the US auto industry & energy development has been put in charge of energy & commerce. The only viable alternative to coal & petroleum is nuclear, & it doesn’t sound like Obama wants to pursue that route.

    Driving up he cost of energy will hurt the entire economy.

  • bayareavoter

    That is actually change we can believe in. I wasn’t happy that Waxman backed The Big O because I have admired him for such a long time and had hoped he’d back Hillary.

    I do have to laugh at this paragraph from the Times:

    Ms. Pelosi backed a candidate who opposed Mr. Dingell in a Democratic primary in 2002, but she has remained officially neutral in the Dingell-Waxman brawl.

    I remember how “neutral” she was during the primary….NOT

  • workingclass artist

    Hmmm…I live in Dallas Texas and I wonder what Waxman’s opinion is about the inland port…Which is a big deal down here…
    Good article Mr. Lemos. I’m still a little leery of progressives in general…because the sting still stings from the primaries…Aaaand I’m worried that the US is not prepared if the PUSH to change is done erratically?

  • ces

    Waxman has been better than some during hearings with the Bush cronies, but…

    Being so close to Pelosi isn’t all that great these days, either.

    I’ll have to wait and see if this is just a power grab or something of substance.

  • fiscalliberal

    Then the question is – who gets the Chairmanship of Oversight.

  • hadenough

    The nyts:
    the vote also removes one of the auto industry’s best friends from a key leadership post

    With friends like that… The US auto industry is in a state of disaster. I’m not blaming Dingell for the state of the auto industry just saying maybe it’s time the auto industry had help from someone else. We don’t know Waxman will do but he’d have to go a long way for a long time to hurt the auto industry any worse than they hurt themselves.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Yes, this was good news. Dingell was the Democrat’s equivalent of Senator Inhoffe-R.

    I remember the show when Al Gore was testifying in March 2007. Dingell need adoration and then after all that, he pushed against increase standards, etc, again, supposedly to HELP the Auto industry. Oh yeah, keeping down CAFE standards and newer technology has REALLY helped our auto industry. (snark)

  • oowawa

    One thing’s for sure about Waxman–he’s not just another pretty face. With a kisser like that and a name like “Waxman,” I suspect he had to have some smarts to get where he is today.

  • I have a bracelet 2

    re: nusaS: If you’re a new reader, I’d just like you to know that Charles Lemos wrote many favorable stories at his blog, and here, about John McCain before the election, and has been a contributor at No Quarter for nearly a year.

    ———

    well, charles lemos was an edwards supporter (per his claim). become a hillary one and was blogging on the confluence or riverdaughter.

    a few weeks before the election he called all the hillary supporters @ confluence stupid housewives because they were not voting for obama !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    also he mentioned that he can not vote for cindy sheenan against nancy pelosi because she is a chavez supporter.

    but, also made an innocent comment that he will have next day launch with paul pelosi, nancy’s son.

    well, in my book, even if his stanford credentials r great (see the harward review editor in this campaign) …… (choke) …

    his politics SUCK

    he is just beging for hits on his own blog after alienating many other bloggers.

    obviously his social skills suck tooo

    now that’s a real introduction of the great charles lemos

  • workingclass artist

    Bracelet…an apt dicription that could apply to many progressives…chuckle…a very confused lot…

  • I have a bracelet 2

    did u mean flip floppers or the ones that r always on the winning team?!

  • beebop

    I want someone who is interested in America’s energy independence. Drill baby, drill.

  • I have a bracelet 2

    by the way, i was looking for you to say hello from time to time. glad u r hanging in there too

  • Galt’s Pizza Parlor & Cat Herding Supplies

    Not to mention one major aspect of our future national security depends on energy independence.

  • KarenG

    I don’t think Dingell will be removed from the committee.
    Do you think Dingell and his supporters on the committee are going to roll over? This could be a interesting committee with lots of infighting among Democrats and Republicans stirring the pot and fighting Waxman.

  • Galt’s Pizza Parlor & Cat Herding Supplies

    I remember how “neutral” she was during the primary….NOT

    Correct! When it looked like the will of the people would help Obama, she was all for it. Once it looked like Hillary would capture the popular vote Pelosi changed her tune. And where was she when the RBC destroyed the concept of fair reflection of votes? I bet she was out smoking a doobie cheering them on.

  • http://uppitywoman08.wordpress.com Uppity Woman

    This appointment should ensure that we never free ourselves from a whit of foreign oil. But we won’t be able to find any corn and rice should be 12 bucks for a small bag in the near future.

  • beebop

    The democraps perfect storm. More money to the three big losers in Detroit and do nothing substantve about energy. Sheezus. Four years will seem like an eternity.

  • Clinton Fan

    Anyone who was nasty to Hillary–OR her supporters–has some asskissing to do before I’ll do anything other than look askance at them!

  • lark

    Wexler. He used to be my hero, way back when. No, I doubt it because he like Barack can make more enemies in one day than an Iranian mullah. But then, how much fun could we be given for free if we could see Wexler head to head with Rahm Emanuel. Now that only could keep us entertained for 4 years non-stop and actually could bring the economy up to 2006 levels.

    Oh oh, did I say

    could bring the economy up to 2006 levels

    Off-topic.

    Major catastrophe.

  • Galt’s Pizza Parlor & Cat Herding Supplies

    I agree. The GOP raided the treasury for a war not called for and god knows what else when they controlled both the legislative and executive branches. There is a lot to clean up and no one to do it, at least not in the foreseeable future.

  • I’m a Linda too

    very informative. … and witty. :)

  • lark

    Oh dear. I just came from the Korean market after buying 20 lbs. of Jasmine rice for 16.00, AAA real fresh.

  • Louie

    I thought Waxman kinda wussed on the oversight hearings, maybe pulling back because of political pressure.

    For things to get better, the politicians have to stop doing favors for guys like Cheney, in terms of backing off, when the heat is on.

    We dont’ survive with a corrupt government, they have to break their denial, or their fear.

    And if Detroit had listened to the CAFE standards, when everyone else could see hte writing on the wall, they would’ be in this position, or it wouldn’t be as critical to their very survival.

  • Mr.Murder

    Actually the drilling market is oversaturated as is. tubing companies are having layoffs.

  • Louie

    I dont know, can’t they find a way to make the mechanisms more energy efficient, at the very least, as opposed to doing a one to one exchange, ie oil for ethanol?

  • Reality not religion

    I’ve always had a lotta luv and admiration for Sen Waxman. So let’s see what he does with this new authority..

  • Peggy Sue

    I’m not cheering this news. We need energy independence, not simply applause for the Home Team. And frankly, if Pelosi was cheering for this win then I probably won’t like the result. We can wax eloquent about green and environmental friendly considerations until we’re blue in the face but without real energy alternatives, bridge strategies to get us there, it’s all nonsense.

    Words matter, remember? But they don’t heat my house or make my car roll down the street.

    Guess I’ll go out and check the air in my tires!

  • Galt’s Pizza Parlor & Cat Herding Supplies

    I should have been more clear: I agree the dems will raid the treasury, just as the GOP did, etc.

  • PamFlorida

    So the Chairmanship of Oversight is Wexler’s reward for giving Fl. to BO. He’s an arrogant opportunist who lacks any ethical standards. He is also my congressman. The only good thing I can say about him is that someone is always in the local office to answer the phone.

  • Ani

    Yes and his coming out to endorse the fraud at the beginning of May is something I will not forgive or forget either.

  • lark

    I would love to see him there but I was just fooling around. Is too much for him and besides it would mean chaos for Obama. I don’t think Wexler’s honeymoon with Obama will last too long.

  • ces

    That’s right…now, all of a sudden it’s the Democrats who want to bail out big corporations.

    What an upside down world!!

  • ritamary

    Strictly a matter of opinion that “the only viable alternative to coal & petroleum is nuclear”. Wind, solar and hydro can provide viable alternatives. Even natural gas is a cleaner alternative to coal, petroleum and nuclear.

  • OxyCon

    All I can say is that with Waxman in charge, I hope he continues to govern in the same honest and fair minded way that he professes to.
    We’ll so alright if he does.

  • adagioforstrings

    Wind, solar, boondoggle biodiesel….are not going to replace the 50% of the energy currently produced by coal.

  • ritamary

    A barrel of oil, the last time I checked a few hours ago, is now going for $49 a barrel. My son just paid $2.20 a gallon for gas in La Jolla. So where is this “drill, baby, drill” sentiment coming from?The falling price of oil gives us some breathing room to come up with viable alternatives NOW.

  • Northwest rain

    Of course the dems will raid the treasury — even thought it is empty, only filled with IOUs notes.

    That shouldn’t bother the Chicago political machine — and these are the people now in control and they managed to loot Chicago, doing a better job than the GOP and in less time!

    An uninformed, misinformed and ignorant electorate can make poor choices.

  • Northwest rain

    For some reason people forget about GEOTHERMAL!

    The west coast is home to several volcanoes.

    The technology to turn water, superheated by heat from a volcano held deep in the ground, into electrical power is one of the GREEN energy sources that hasn’t been exploited fully in the US.

    It is beyond me why WA state doesn’t have even ONE geothermal plant. Idaho did have at least one, it went into production, proved that it could generate considerable energy, and then shut down in the 1980s. Getting another Geothermal power plant on line seems to be still in the planning stages.

    WA state tried to go the nuclear power route — there was an ambitious project to build several nuke elec. power generating facilities. This project went bankrupt in the 1980s.

    After WA’s experience I’m sort of biased against building more of these nuclear white elephants.

  • TeakWoodKite

    Excellent Charles Lemos.

    It is interesting in light of the Bush admin gutting the EPA a nd endangered the endangered species at.

    Get ready for electric highways.

blog comments powered by Disqus