The Year of the PUMA
By Steve_in_KC on November 23, 2008 at 5:38 PM in Current Affairs
Before I start making a fool of myself, let me preface my remarks with the disclaimer that I didn’t do much research and this isn’t meant to be an authoritative article. It’s just a collection of musings, and my memories of the last several months. If I get some facts wrong, please give me your version, correct me if appropriate, and share your own thoughts on the matter. I’m not a historian. I’m not a Democrat. I’m not sure if I am a PUMA, but I thought I was for awhile. But then, I used to think it was pronounced “pyooma,” so what do I know?
Prior to June, I had been part of an online forum for musicians, being I am one, and that forum had a separate section, a mini-forum, for discussing politics. This group was 99% male, and most of them were rock musicians. It became obvious by January that I was the only Hillary supporter in the bunch, with the one exception being the wife of the site owner. Even she got shouted down for daring to comment that she thought Hillary’s eight years as First Lady, especially given her activism, was indeed experience that counts toward her qualifications for president. The typical comeback was along the lines of, “Oh, I guess that means Yoko Ono was qualified to be a Beatle!”
These guys posted all the hateful Hillary pictures and clips we’ve all come to loathe. The misogyny was palpable. Of course, when I called them on it, they denied it outright.
The last straw was when a guy I thought was my friend answered a post of mine with a doctored photo of Hillary aiming a pistol and some comment about Vince Foster. At first, I just wanted to throw something back at him. I started looking for unflattering pictures of Obama, or negative articles, or anything to counter-punch. It was easy to find unflattering pictures of Hillary, all kinds of Clinton bashing, and worst of all, Democrats delighting in perpetuating the worst of the Republican lies and slander ever thrown at Bill and Hill. But nary a discouraging word about His O-ness. I was so stunned by this lack of criticism, I spent days trying to find some dirt on him. In desperation, I tried Googling different phrases, like “Obama sucks,” “I hate Obama,” and even “Obama is an a**h***.”
One search result turned up my first exposure to a PUMA site. At first, I was delighted, diving into all that Obama antipathy with relish. It slowly began to dawn on me, as I read the postings at this site, that I was once again outnumbered, in the 1% group again, this time because I was male. My posts were ignored, for the most part. I didn’t mind being the only male most of the time, but many of the posts were more like chat stuff than political opinions. I didn’t want to read about how everybody’s day was going, I wanted political hand grenades to throw back at the hateful Obama supporters, something that would draw blood!
So, I mostly scanned through the chat looking for links to news stories. Fortunately, a few of those links pointed to No Quarter, and I quickly became addicted. And I never looked back. I also follow many of the links at NQ, and have done a good deal of reading other PUMA blogs. But I always find I’m starting and ending my online sessions with NQ. By contrast, I sometimes don’t even think of NQ as a PUMA site, although I guess it is, but it’s so much more than that. It’s like “PUMA-Plus.”
But now the questions I find myself asking myself (because I’m such a good listener!) are these:
What exactly is PUMA and is it still relevant? Is the PUMA thing a thing of the past with the passing of the election? And am I a closet Republican now? Oh, no, forget that last one! That was definitely just a phase I was going through!
As I try to answer the other questions, please bear with me, because I don’t know the answers yet, and I’m not sure there are definitive answers yet. For starters, there were two different PUMA groups, as most of you know; the Party Unity My Ass group started by Will Bower, and the People United Means Action group started by Darragh Murphy. I prefer the former to the latter, personally. There were many other blogs and organized groups that all started around the same time, back in June, and they all basically agreed to use PUMA as a designation. I always thought a PUMA was anyone who usually voted for the Democrat for president, but couldn’t get behind BHO. I think most people associate PUMA with Hillary Clinton supporters who were upset she didn’t get the nomination. Most of you know that’s not accurate, that the real issue is the way the Democratic National Committee flagrantly broke their own rules in order to assure Obama’s victory in the Primaries, and to stop Hillary at any cost.
So that begs the question: do you have to be a registered Democrat to be a true PUMA? If so, that leaves me out. I’ve always been an Indie. So if I’m not a registered Democrat, do I have any right to be indignant about the way they conduct their business? And do I have standing to take a stand on Party Unity, My own personal Ass notwithstanding?
If we take the Big Tent approach to the issue, I’d say the PUMAs came to represent all those who had supported Hillary for the nomination and refused to support Obama BECAUSE HE’S NOT QUALIFIED. If being an Indie means I’m not technically a PUMA, I am proud to stand with these people. Although I prefer to sit, even on this hard steno chair.
And like most of them, I’m also a patriot, at least in the sense that I’m not unpatriotic. I’m not one to say “love it or leave it,” or “my country, right or wrong.” But I do have strong feelings for America, and I believe in supporting our troops, even if I don’t like some of the missions the CIC chooses. So now I have to decide if I can accept this new CIC-in-training. This is a bit troubling for me. I remember well how viscerally many Republicans hated Bill Clinton from Day One. I remember thinking how unpatriotic they were to say things like “he’s not MY president!” I remember how they called him a draft dodger, criticized his college trip to Russia as some kind of treason, and spent the entire eight years of his presidency trying to impeach him. I have to confess, I’m a little uncomfortable right now, as I write this. You know why. It’s this damn steno chair!
I guess I’m still shocked that the Republicans let Obama win so easily. Where was all that Republican viciousness when we needed it? Did they WANT him to win? Probably so, just so they can do a repeat of the 90s and spend all their time putting the Democratic President’s feet to the fire again! That sounds about right. The country’s a mess right now, so no matter what goes wrong, it’ll be the Democrats that get the blame. It does have a certain Cheney-Rovian evil genius quality to it, doesn’t it?
OK, so this article is meandering, just like my befuddled brain as I try to piece this all together. But I really want to understand if PUMA is the beginning of a new political party – or was it just a summer romance? I guess what I really have come to believe lately is that while No Quarter is still considered a PUMA website, part of the PUMA network, I think it’s much more than that. I know NQ was here before PUMA, and it will be here when PUMA falls out of our lexicon. And as long as No Quarter stays focused on the big picture, beyond this year’s elections, I think it can be a top political blog. And I intend to stay here.






















