RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Change in intelligence?

[This op-ed was written for and published in The Baltimore Sun on November 14, 2008. Mel Goodman is Larry Johnson's good friend. Larry received Mr. Goodman's express permission to reprint this op-ed piece in full.

The Sun describes Mr. Goodman thusly: "Melvin A. Goodman was an intelligence analyst at the CIA from 1966 to 1990 and is the author of 'Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA'."]

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

President-elect Barack Obama is sending conflicting signals on whether he intends to change the bankrupt culture of Washington’s intelligence community and to introduce genuine reform to the Central Intelligence Agency.

He appears to be ready to remove the top two intelligence officials, Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and CIA Director Michael V. Hayden – both retired general officers – which suggests Mr. Obama recognizes the need to change the military culture of the intelligence community. But he also has placed the intelligence transition process in the hands of two senior cronies of former CIA Director George J. Tenet: John O. Brennan and Jami A. Miscik, who were actively engaged in implementing and defending the CIA’s corrupt activities during the Bush presidency.


Mr. Obama’s apparent willingness to demilitarize the leadership of the intelligence community is an essential ingredient for changing the culture of the national security process. The Bush administration boasted of a “marriage” between the Pentagon and the CIA, which made the intelligence community subordinate to the Pentagon, which controls more than 80 percent of the intelligence budget and more than 85 percent of all intelligence personnel.

Numerous independent reviews of the intelligence community in the past several years, including retired Gen. Brent Scowcroft’s review for the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, concluded that it was necessary to weaken the Pentagon’s control over budgetary and data collection requirements. Mr. Scowcroft also recommended placing three of the key technical and analytic collection agencies under the authority of the director of national intelligence and not the Pentagon.

Unfortunately, the congressional intelligence committees have been negligent in proposing reforms for the community or reversing the Pentagon’s corporate control over the process. The next president should encourage strengthening the oversight mission of the intelligence committees and the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.

Instead of placing the transition process under a seasoned professional such as Mr. Scowcroft, the Obama team has turned to discredited cronies of the Tenet era. Mr. Brennan, as chief of staff and deputy executive director under Mr. Tenet, was involved in decisions to conduct torture and abuse of suspected terrorists and to render suspected individuals to foreign intelligence services that conducted their own torture and abuse. Mr. Brennan had risen through the analytic ranks and should have known that analytic standards were being ignored in Mr. Tenet’s CIA. He was also an active defender of the illegal program of warrantless eavesdropping, implemented at the National Security Agency under the leadership of Mr. Hayden, then director of NSA.

Ms. Miscik was deputy director of intelligence for Mr. Tenet during the run-up to the Iraq war, when intelligence was manipulated to support the Bush administration’s decision to use force in Iraq. She endorsed the politicized findings of the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in October 2002, as well as the unclassified White Paper of October 2002 that was designed to sway votes on the authorization to use force against Iraq. Ms. Miscik was also a willing participant in the crafting of Secretary of State Colin L. Powell‘s regrettable speech to the United Nations in February 2003, which was designed to sway the international community.

Other key members of Mr. Obama’s intelligence advisory panel have been former CIA Deputy Director John McLaughlin, who helped to suppress proof that various sources of intelligence in Iraqi WMD were in fact fabricators, and Rob Richer, a senior clandestine services officer who was a key implementer of the renditions and detentions program.

Mr. Obama will not be able to change the culture of the intelligence community and restore the moral compass of the CIA unless there is a full understanding and repudiation of the operational and analytical crimes committed in the Tenet era. If Mr. Obama genuinely wants to roll back the misdeeds of Vice President Dick Cheney, restore the rule of law at the CIA and create the change that Americans want and can believe in, he should not be relying for advice on the senior officials who endorsed these shameful actions.

  • untilthelastdogdies

    Hell, here we go again…it seems everyone responsible for WMD hood-winking is
    bellying up to the trough and being rewarded.

    It’s disgusting.

  • http://ontheseventhday.wordpress.com/ Al

    As long as the end result is our nation remains safe and free from any “clear and present danger”, let the president-elect endeavor to do what he wishes; however, bottom line, America remains safe and free.

    http://ontheseventhday.wordpress.com/

    • Bo

      Isn’t that connection casual, at best?

    • Ferd Berfle

      however, bottom line, America remains safe and free.

      It seems to me that the emphasis has been far too much on “safe” and not enough on “free”. I’d rather keep the Constitution and my rights thereunder intact and be only marginally less safe than give up rights I served to defend so somecne may “feel” safe. A right is a tangible thing; a feeling of safety is different things to different people. Those who want complete safety should report to the nearest constabulary for a nice, safe jail cell. They won’t be free but they will be safe.

      • TeakWoodKite

        Ferd.. it is that annoying thing again …freedom…

        What is the cost of it?

        A start would be speaking truth to power. After witnessing the aftermath of Katrina, anyone thinking they are being kept “safe” are seriously out to lunch. Fraudulent myth, that one.

        They will be safe until an NSL comes to there world. Then what is safety to them?
        YUP, I will take the “the Constitution and my rights” everytime.

  • Hillary_for_president

    were actively engaged in implementing and defending the CIA’s corrupt activities during the Bush presidency

    WTF? :?:

    • csuzeq

      Mr. Corruption superior (AKA Odrama) is making sure he can do what he wants to do and get away with it, too.

      Duh!

      • Ferd Berfle

        The way things are set up now, he can. That’s why I despise the Patriot (Last-Refuge-of-Scoundrels) Act. It never should have been enacted in the first place. I don’t like the current occupant of the WH to have such power and I certainly don’t want the next occupier to have it, either since it allows for far too much political mischief.

  • Trakar S.

    “Accountability?” I believe that was taken off the ballots back before the primary season even got into full swing!

  • Mercedes

    Mr Goodman says,

    “Unfortunately, the congressional intelligence committees have been negligent in proposing reforms for the community or reversing the Pentagon’s corporate control over the process. The next president should encourage strengthening the oversight mission of the intelligence committees and the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.”

    This is the part I don’t get. Senator Jay Rockefeller, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, endorsed Obama during the primaries back in February giving some flimsy reason such as Obama being the right person for the presidency at this time.

    Clearly, Sen Rockefeller is not a straight talker. I interpret his endorsement of Obama to mean that Obama would do what his puppetmasters tell him to do. In any case, I would think that Sen Rockefeller would have some significant influence over Obama’s intelligence choices.

    As far as I can tell, Obama is not heading in the direction this article recommends and he probably has the support of Mr Rockefeller in doing so.

    Makes you wonder!

  • athy

    Mel,
    Good article.
    What Barack Obama is doing on the ‘CIA’ front with regards to appointments- is running parallel to what Barack Obama has done with regards to his other appointments. His choices are disintegrating any illusions that his supporters may have held regarding ” C H A N G E ” .

    Check out this EXCELLENT article:

    http://www.democracynow.org/2008/11/24/noam_chomsky_what_next_the_elections

    Noam Chomsky is interviewed by Amy Goodman of Democracy Now-

    Chomsky nails it. Read about what really happened during this election campaign and what Barack Obama’s appointments are indicating to us with
    regards to how he will govern our country.

    This man is brilliant.I dont always agree with his positions but I truly respect his intelligence, knowledge and passion for the truth.

  • Mr.Murder

    How can Congress do anything? One change gets implemented, Commander Bunnypants the Chickenhawk in Chief can ignore more INTEL and get us into another war or terror event and blame the Congress for being in his way.

    Who’s going to say the telecomms would do anything and report it other than how TASS would do it in their heyday?

    We’re not an empire or a republic. We are rent-a-cop who outsources mercs to fight as police for world’s investor class.
    It’s one reason McCain only plausibly opposed Obama, Steve Clemons indicates they shared with one another prospects for the transition team.

    Keep your enemies closer. Hillary as Sec. of State, for example.

    • TeakWoodKite

      And in Obama’s case, their money even closer, while saying, “Who me?”

  • bob

    All I know is, we have to kill Osama Bin Laden. He’s much too dangerous to be allowed to go on living. He won’t attack America again but I see him first getting the fissile material from Iran and then making a dirty bomb to detonate in Israel.

    • Ferd Berfle

      Israel can take care of itself quite well, actually. I’m sure they are actively pursuing Osama and will more than likely find him before we ever get around to it.

      • bob

        Why take the chance?

        • Ferd Berfle

          I thought the last 7+ years were all about finding bin Laden. Israel will find him before we do, I’m sure as they tread lightly and carry a deadly stick, so to speak.

          • TeakWoodKite

            Ferd, if you recall the OBL group was disbanded and then re-instated when word got out…

            I never read anything that indicated it was re-instated for anything more than political cover.

  • bob

    I’m also worried about the Laguna Verde BWR near Mexico City. That’s just a bomb waiting to go off.

  • Doc99

    Tenet should have been booted after W’s inauguration. Today’s CIA is a far cry from Wild Bill Donovan’s OSS.

  • Judy L. NC

    Thanks for posting this, Larry. I wouldn’t have recognized those names as WMD-hoodwink supporters.

    Next pressing question: is there any way to get George’s Medal of Freedom back?

  • TeakWoodKite

    If the Congressional members on the intelligence over-site committees did not believe Robert Gates, a former DCI (1991-93) who was informed by Oliver North that Swiss bank accounts were being used to transfer funds for the Iran-Contra affair, what can be done to reform the CIA?

    One thinks not much has changed. After reading “A Failure of Intelligence”, Gates was responsible for turning over control of key functional aspects of the CIA to the DIA and followed by Tenet who allowed Rummy to consolidate covert action being run out of DoD.

    Tenet, according to Goodman’s book, did nothing to stop the formation of Rummy’s Office of Special Plans”

    The Scowcroft draft commission report(2001) ;

    This group came up with a draft report that suggested giving the DCI direct authority over the major national intelligence agencies (the NRO, NSA, and NIMA).[13]

    The commission’s recommendations were never formally transmitted to the president.[14]

    Favorite quote (p327)
    “The Agency can be organized and re-organized as many times as the deck chairs on the Titanic can be rearranged, but without a stable and senior leadership it will continue to flounder”.

    Goodman makes the point that there is a need for demilitarizing the intelligence community and highlights the fact that there is a lack of “seniors officers to train and mentor” (p341) the rank and file.

    I am curious how one goes about creating “competitive analysis” in an effort to have balanced reporting in the intelligence community and not have it lead to an increase in turf battles.

    I agree with Melvin Goodman when he says “The intelligence failures of 9/11 and the Iraq War had nothing to do with a dearth of officers; it had everything to do with an inability to tell truth to power and a failure of imagination”.

    Great and informative read, especially for a layman, like my self.

  • I’m a Linda too

    Thank you Mel for sharing your thoughts and post.

    Yes. As I’m now fond of repeating,

    The Obama administration Motto:
    “Everything old is new again.
    What once was politics of the past
    is now change for the future.”

  • Bo

    Isn’t Washington intel a bit isolated?

  • Pingback: John Brennan, Good Riddance : NO QUARTER