RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Obama Still Doesn’t Get It on Syria

The Obama Administration’s disconnect on its policy in Iraq and it policy in Syria is stunning. Barack was celebrating the fact that he got us out of Iraq:

“When you’re commander in chief, you owe the troops a plan,” Obama said. On Afghanistan, Obama needled Romney for opposing the 2014 timeline for ending the war. “You know what? That’s not a plan for America’s security,” he said. . . .

Four years later, Obama said Monday: “We’re leading around the world. There’s more confidence in our leadership. We see it everywhere we go.”

So how is that Iraq thing working out?

The headline from USA Today tells the whole story–Iraq attacks kill 110 in deadliest day in 2 years


A startling spasm of violence shook more than a dozen Iraqi cities Monday, killing more than 100 people in coordinated bombings and shootings and wounding twice as many in the country’s deadliest day in more than two years.

The attacks came only days after al-Qaeda announced it would attempt a comeback with a new offensive against Iraq’s weakened government.

With the U.S. military gone and the government mired in infighting, the Iraqi wing of al-Qaeda has vowed to retake areas it once controlled and push the nation back toward civil war. Though there was no immediate claim of responsibility for Monday’s attacks, nearly all of them struck in the capital and in northern Iraqi cities where al-Qaeda can most easily regain a foothold.

Meanwhile, in Syria, Barack and his “crack” National Security team are enabling the very guys who are carrying out the attacks in Iraq.

President Barack Obama warned Syria’s Bashar Assad on Monday that he will be held accountable if he makes the “tragic mistake” of using chemical weapons on his own people.

His blunt warning came shortly after Syria—gripped by deadly violence since an uprising against Assad that began early last year—threatened to use chemical and biological weapons if attacked from the outside. It was the first formal admission from Damascus that the regime, long a close partner of Iran, has weapons of mass destruction. . . .

Obama said he was “working for a transition so the Syrian people can have a better future, free of the Assad regime.”

Tough talk predicated on the bizarre belief that we must get rid of Assad in order to stop Iran. News flash for these clueless boobs–Iraq is under the control of Iran. The leadership in Iraq was protected by Iran when Saddam Hussein was in power. The terrorists killing hundreds in Iraq are the same guys who are spearheading the effort to dump Assad in Syria.

Look at how we have reacted to the senseless murder of 12 in Colorado–flags at half mast, national mourning, wall to wall cable coverage. Do you think the Iraqis might be feeling more pain with the senseless murder of 110 Iraqis yesterday? Bet your ass they do.

And Barack Obama believes, in his delusional world, that his policy has inspired more confidence in America’s leadership? What a crock!

Instead of helping Assad to contain the rising tide of terror inspired by Sunni extremists who are in league with Al Qaeda in Iraq, Obama is sending signals that he will welcome their take over of Syria. Mark this moment carefully. We are witnessing the rise of a new wave of Islamic terrorism in the Middle East that will not be easily contained and will bite us again in the ass.

  • HARP2

    President Obama Praises Self for Ending War in Iraq on Bloodiest Day of the Year in That Country

    President Obama’s campaign today released a video
    praising the president for ending the war in Iraq. It turns out that
    today has proven to be the deadliest day of the year in that country.

    A wave of attacks throughout Iraq – IEDs, explosions, and gunmen —
    has resulted in more than 100 people killed and more than 200 wounded.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/president-obama-praises-self-for-ending-war-in-iraq-on-bloodiest-day-of-the-year-in-that-country/

  • HELENK2

    were the chemical weapons that are in Syria now , moved from Iraq when we invaded that country???

    • TeakWoodKite

      That was a story I read on Debka and other “outlets” at the time…
      I think David Kay in his testimoney to the intel committe ave an accurate assessmet of Saddams chemical/bio weapons..I am sure that Mrs Wilson has a comment on it too, but they were all redacted.

  • Fred82

    Larry,

    What kind of capability do we currently have to carry out strikes and Special Operations in Iraq?

    • http://noquarterusa.net Larry Johnson

      Fred,
      A good question but it is the wrong question. What is the end game? We put troops in and then what? Occupy Syria? That creates some real potential for conflict with the Russians on the other side. I know what we’re planning to do on the Spec Ops side but cannot comment because I don’t want to write anything that could put our troops at risk.

      If Assad goes then who takes over? The Western fantasy of moderates who favor a western style democracy is delusional on our part. Civil Wars are messy. We should understand that given our own blood soaked history on that count.

      • Fred82

        I agree.

        If Assad goes we are likely to see Sunni Islamists take the reigns of power.

        From what I have seen, I think it is debatable as to how secular the FSA really is. Moreover, the FSA’s contribution to the fight is questionable. The FSA has been reported as engaging in disinformation operations and staging “engagements” for propaganda purposes.

        I don’t think we will like what comes after Assad.

  • HELENK2

    http://blogs.aljazeera.com/topic/syria/us-shifting-syria-focus-un-diplomacy-aiding-rebels

    from aljazeera
    us shifting syria focus from UN diplomacy to aiding rebels

    I am sure the Arab world just loves this

  • HELENK2

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/24/world/middleeast/chemical-weapons-wont-be-used-in-rebellion-syria-says.html?_r=1&hp

    Assad chemical weapons would be used on foreign forces invading Syria not on rebels

    • TeakWoodKite

      Crazy Arab Sprung

  • HELENK2

    Al Arabiya English
    ‏@AlArabiya_Eng

    Syrian rebels say Assad has moved chemical weapons to borders: AFP #AlArabiya #Syria #Assad

  • HELENK2
  • BronwynsHarbor

    110 people in a dozen cities. Sickening. Larry’s last paragraph is just plain chilling … Obama’s obviously STUCK in a time warp dominated due to his schooling by Bill Ayers, RASHID KHALIDI* et al … the NAIVE notion that rebels are good and noble. Why so noble? Because they’re rebels! Who’s running the rebellion is naively overlooked.

    *Mustn’t overlook Rashid Khalidi’s highly significant influence on Obama who hung out at Khalidi’s home in Chicago. A lot. (Note to self: Dig up NQUSA’s archives on Rashid Khalidi. It still blows my mind that his bio has been scrubbed so well that he now presents as an acceptable expert on Charlie Rose. Wow.

    • BronwynsHarbor

      Larry knows far more on Khalidi. I just glanced through his bio at Wikipedia. Here’s a sample:

      Regarding American support for Israel, Khalidi stated in an interview that “every other single place on the face of the earth is in support of the Palestinians, yet all of them together aren’t a hill of beans compared to the United States and Israel, because the United States and Israel can basically do anything they please. They are the world superpower, they are the regional superpower.”[30]A New York Sun editorial criticized Khalidi for stating that there is a legal right under international law for Palestinians to resist Israeli occupation.[31] For example, in a speech given to the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Khalidi said that “[k]illing civilians is a war crime. It’s a violation of international law. They are not soldiers. They’re civilians, they’re unarmed. The ones who are armed, the ones who are soldiers, the ones who are in occupation, that’s different. That’s resistance.”[31][32] The Sun editorial argued that by failing to distinguish between Palestinian combatants and noncombatants, Khalidi implies that all Palestinians have this right to resist, which it claimed was incorrect under international law.[31] …AND THIS:Consequent to publication by the Los Angeles Times of an article about Obama’s attendance at a 2003 farewell dinner for Khalidi, their relationship became an issue in the campaign.[37] Some opponents of Barack Obama claimed that the relationship between Obama and Khalidi was evidence that Obama would not maintain a pro-Israel foreign policy if elected.[37] When asked, Obama called his own commitment to Israel “unshakeable” and he does not consult with Khalidi on foreign policy.[38]

      OF NOTE: John McCain today criticized Pres. Obama’s failure to visit Israel during his presidency, and Obama’s rude treatment of Netanyahu.
      #38 footnote in the Wikipedia story goes to an ABC News story in 2008, “Obama on the Defensive Before Fla. Jewish Voters.”
      http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/05/obama-on-the-de/

  • Popsmoke

    How can we do anything smartly, when our own intelligence folk are still trying to figure out who is really who and what is really what?

    This neoWilsonian policy of intervention is just as bad a the neoCon policies were. I am totally surprised at Hillary.

    • Hokma

      I don’t think what Obama has can be called a policy. If anything it is simply a knee-jerk extension of U.S. ongoing policy since WW II to be the world’s policeman and the need to pick sides in any conflict. Hillary is simply the latest actor in the play.

      In the cases of Libya and Syria we have no idea who we are siding with and in both cases it is a lose/lose. Our only interest should be to secure whatever WMD Assad has.

      The only cases where Presidents wanted a policy of non-intervention was Eisenhower but then got involved in Southeast Asia. George HW Bush did the right thing by limiting the engagement to kicking Iraq out of Kuwait. Coincidentally, when George W. Bush came to office it was with a policy of nonengagement and no nationa building. Then came 9/11 and that policy was forgotten and we were back to business as usual.

    • jrterrier

      Pop, I’m glad to be able to agree with you on this. It is frightening so see us supporting armed insurrections being waged by people who are at least in part the very ones promoting attacks on the USA and the west.

    • lola828

      And yet your leader Larry Johnson seems to have the opposition all figured out.

      Proving once again their is a low bar for hiring intelligence officiers in this country.

    • scottymac54

      “This neoWilsonian policy of intervention is just as bad a the neoCon policies were…”
      That was my thinking as well, until I saw Dan Senor speaking for Romney the other day on TV.
      Romney’s choice of foreign policy advisors was the number one red flag for me. For myself, and other Democrats, this overshadowed every single other issue and many of us realized, there was no way we could support him, even if in EVERY other single way, Romney would be better than Barky.
      Just hearing Senor’s voice again and hearing his phrasing at least helped me realize, I could not support supplanting a recent nightmare with a more distant one.

      • mgm

        I agree and am worried and disappointed.with Romney’s choice.

  • elizabethrc

    When I was a child I stamped my foot and cried, “but I WANT it!”. I fully expected that to make it happen. I see Obama as being no different than I was in my childish expectations. In his position, he is putting this entire country (and maybe the western world) in great jeopardy. That’s a little more frightening than my putting my little butt in jeopardy of a spanking.

  • Pingback: UPDATE: Obama Still Doesn't Get It on Syria : NO QUARTER « Regional Wars!

  • KenoshaMarge

    I don’t think most people understand, and I was one of them, that there are worse things than murdering dictators. I was not ever naive enough to think that some wondrous “democracy” would bloom in Iraq, Libya or Egypt.

    Thanks to LJ I understand more than I would otherwise. Still not completely but that would take a lifetime and a crystal ball, but better than average because it is explained simply and without rhetorical flourishes. I am grateful for that.

    With the fall of each nasty POS in charge of a middle-east country we seem to get something worse. Is our meddling to blame? Some? A little? A lot?

    Are we guilty ofr a willful ignorance or just the garden-variety kind? Or perhaps attempting to govern with wishful thinking?

    • buzzlatte3

      Has much changed in the history of the world? Nah. The Middle East is still tribal and violent. Africa is still fraught with disease and violence. Egypt is continually trying to find itself. Russia still looms like a big wounded, ignorant bear. Great Britain is still trying to rule something, anything. France is still snotty and Germany is still making rules. China is still remote, overcrowded and subject to suppressing its’ people in unacceptable ways. The USA is still fresh faced and overly exuberant about spreading freedom – except our problems with the current president are dampening our vision of ourselves. South America is still basically ruled by the invaders and Mexico is a mishmash of intelligence and outright stupidity. Small countries are trying to appear larger than they are, the Greeks are still fraught with crisis and a greek chorus and Spain is still in some sort of revolution. Italy still makes great food and sometimes questionable cars. The rest are quiet for now…but subject to jumping on some bandwagon at any given moment. It’s the way of this world. (meant to be humor and not necessarily politically correct or accurate.)

      • KenoshaMarge

        Too much truth there to be really funny buzz. But the world is filled with human beings. Some have evolved from barbarians, some think they have and others ain’t even trying. I tend to go from there in my assessments.

  • Lemuel Vargas

    So what do you think must be done with Assads’ Militia (with maybe tacit approval from Assad) murdering the civilians who has nothing to do with the Revolution other than being on the wrong side of the fence?
    This is addressed to Larry Johnson, btw.

    • http://noquarterusa.net Larry Johnson

      I am amused by folks who have no vested interest in a country eager to pass judgment. Our Civil War was much bloodier and more vicious than anything going on in Syria. Assad is fighting to preserve some hope for mutli-ethnic society. If the Sunnis prevail say goodbye to the Alawites and the Christians.

  • jrterrier

    I think he made the statement in front of the Veterans’ convention “We’re leading around the world. There’s more confidence in our leadership. We see it everywhere we go.”
    Isn’t that a group which would be the least likely to accept this characterization?

  • buzzlatte3

    OT: Aurora shooter Holmes was given 26K in fed grant money for PhD degree…sort of an obtuse F and F ? drudgereport.com

  • alicewolf

    HELLOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! Is anyone out there??????????
    We need to consider this ” Does anyone get it about OBAMA?”
    Forget about what Obama does or doesn’t get about Syria.
    Obama will get us into this war, whoever it is between, depending on the oligarchs and who they are paying off to get a way, any war, going as quickly as possible, because he is there in the WH to do their bidding. He may or may not be able to understand exactly how much damage he will do but he is surrounded by people who have no conscience, no true compassion or feelings for the idea of how dreadfull thermonuclear war would be, and if they do, their consciences are so seared by their antics up till now that they are no longer capable of true discernment.
    I hate to be a party pooper, but this party has to stop.
    The lights have to go on and the cleaners need to come in and clean up.

    • buzzlatte3

      Obama wants a war to seal the deal on his second term.

      • alicewolf

        That may be…………………..but that’s not quite all. What he intends to do with his second term, or what his controllers want him to do with it is what’s at stake. Listening to him and Romney makes it hard to imagine even getting to the election day, let alone making it after that in anything other than a coffin, is not easy. We really need a decent patriotic president to take over the presidency, and some patriotic Congressmen and women to sit on Capitol Hill. The US Constitution is no open to being ripped apart and made a mockery of, it is the foundation of what was known formerly as the American Dream and it can come true if we stick to our guns. Pun intended!!!! Ha Ha!!!

  • foxyladi14

    Good post Larry.actually Syria isn’t the only thing he is getting wrong.

  • HELENK2

    Hillary Clinton says ‘it is not too late’ for Syria’s Assad to commence planning for a political transition – @Reuters

    • scottymac54

      How well did that work out for Mubarak, though?
      (I know, apples and oranges, but still….)

  • HELENK2

    http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/bre86n11z-us-syria-crisis-chemicals/

    Moscow and US work together on Syria’s chemical weapon threat

  • lola828

    Larry Johnson you are a funny guy and usual a “crack” Middle East analyst.

    Do you even know what Obama’s Syria strategy is?

    As usual you sound like you are just projecting your own bullshit or creating some kind of strawman in order to blame Obama for something.

    You are just speculating on the Administration’s policy. You have no real clue. Sounds to me like Obama wants regime change like the rest of the planet, but there is no indication of how the Administration wants it. Does the Administration want a violent overthrow or through non-violent pressure by isolating the Assad regime and forcing further defections? What we do know is that Obama is not in favor of supplying weapons to the opposition. We also know that McCain and others in the Republican Party do want to supply weapons to the opposition. You should be much more angry at the Republican position on Syria, given your desire, like in Egypt, to keep the strong man in power.

    “Tough talk predicated on the bizarre belief that we must get rid of Assad in order to stop Iran.”

    That is a completely bullshit statement. When did Obama or the Administration ever say anything about Iran. You are just making this shit up. Strawmen as I said.

    “The terrorists killing hundreds in Iraq are the same guys who are spearheading the effort to dump Assad in Syria.”

    So those doing the attacks in Iraq are the same as all those Syrians trying to overthrow Assad. Complete BS. I would say completely the opposite.

    “Instead of helping Assad to contain the rising tide of terror inspired by Sunni extremists who are in league with Al Qaeda in Iraq, Obama is sending signals that he will welcome their take over of Syria.”

    You are a nut. You think this is just about some Sunni extremists committing terrorist attacks in Syria to get rid of Assad. More “crack” Middle East analysis from you.

    You do not even know who the opposition groups are and who the Obama administration supports. It appears to me that the opposition is now being significantly supported by Turkey, which is a good thing. Turkey can be a very important moderating and stabilizing factor in Syria, completely different than Egypt or Iraq. Two dozen Syrian Brigadier Generals have already defected to Turkey. Qatar and Saudi Arabia may also be big supporters of the opposition. There is some evidence they are supplying the opposition with RPG-29s.

    The Russian Ambassador to France said last Friday that Assad was ready to step down “in a civilized manner”, which suggests the pressure might be working. Don’t you think it is a good idea for the Obama administration to prepare for a Syria without Assad?

    Tragic that violence continues in Iraq, but not our problem. Too bad your guy Bush completely screwed up that country and left it in terrible shape. It is a good thing that Obama got us the hell out of that country. Again you attempt to turn the Colorado shooting into a political issue. You first tried to make it a race issue in your previous post and now you somehow want to link it to violence in Iraq. And you have the nerve to complain about the President’s reaction to the Colorado tragedy. You are a hypocrite as usual.

    • Hokma

      “Do you even know what Obama’s Syria strategy is?”

      Can you articulate a coherent strategy there or anywhere else? Probably not because there is none.

      The only policy I can discern is that he supports radical Islamist regimes which would account for his wanting to replace Mubarak with the Muslim Brotherhood; replace Gaddafi with The Muslim Brotherhood, replace Assad with The Muslim Brotherhood (or someother radical organization), and do nothing during the uprising in Iran when a radical Islamist regime was on the threhold of an overthrow.

      The rest of your rant is generally incoherent and as usual you just string togther David Axelgrease talking points.

    • Fred82

      Eh,

      Qatar and Saudi Arabia are notorious for supporting armed Sunni extremists throughout the World. Moreover, many of al Qaida’s primary supporters are wealthy Wahhabi businessmen. Plenty of those to be found in both Qatar and Saudi Arabia if you ask me.

      Russia and China do not seem particularly thrilled at the prospect of a new regime in Syria. Given India’s numerous problems with Sunni Islamists, I doubt the Indians are thrilled at such an endgame either. That effectively kills the whole world wants regime change argument.

      BTW many of the fighters in Syria are the same ones who killed US troops in Iraq. The Syrians in Iraq tended to be fanatical, professional jihadists. In fact Zarqawi’s camp in Herat was known for catering to those from the Levant, including Syrians. In all likelihood Sheikh Issa and Mustafa Setmariam Nasar are running around somewhere in the mix as wll.

      Oh and how did Obama get us out of Iraq? If I remember correctly, he merely stuck to a deal that was brokered in 2008 by the Bush Administration.

      • lola828

        There are many different groups, factions and tribes that are now forming the opposition in Syria. And the number of different tribes seems to grow every day. There is no evidence that a great number of the opposition groups are affiliated with Al Qaeda or are those that fought in Iraq against America or are Sunni extremists. That is a complete exaggeration. Like in Libya there are likely a few who did fight in Iraq, but they are not the driving force. Like in Libya most of the opposition appears to just plain everyday Syrians tired of living under a repressive regime. There are many in the military who have defected.

        It was the Baath Party government in Syria that was allied to Saddam Hussein. To a certain degree the Syrian Baath Party government or Assad supported the insurgency in Iraq. Those are the ones who the opposition is trying to get rid of. They are trying to get rid of the real supporters of those who fought against Americans.

        I give Obama full credit for sticking to the withdraw plan from Iraq. Many Republicans like Larry Johnson want us still to be in Iraq. And the amazing thing was the U.S. withdrawal was done without incident. Quite a feat. Obama deserves to be re-elected alone based on our withdrawal from Iraq.

        These kinds of geopolitical changes scare the shit out of old CIA guys like Larry Johnson. They are use to living in a world where the U.S. has complete control through military dictatorships.

        • http://noquarterusa.net Larry Johnson

          You are just a clueless buffoon. Just like Obama. I appreciate you channeling the Golden Boy from Hawaii for us.

          • shelldoll2

            Mr. Johnson this troll cannot be taught. You have lived, traveled, and done your job abroad.

            This is a poseur that would not know sacrifice if it bit them.

            I know it is lying and you do too. Funny how they personally attack you. Tells me everything I need to know,

        • Fred82

          Eh No.

          The Syrian Baath party was closer to Iran than Iraq. The Alawites (nominal Shia) were considered non-Muslim by many in the Islamic world. The Iranian clergy recognized them as Muslim and the Syrian regime became an ally of Iran. The Syrians supported Iran during Iran-Iraq war and the effort to oust Saddam Hussein from Kuwait.

          Moreover, Saddam Hussein was a malignant narcissist who probably viewed the Assads as a threat to his status as undisputed champion of pan-Arabism. In fact Saddam was known to support anti-Syrian elements such as the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood and Fighting Vanguards.

          To some extent, the Assad regime did support the Iraqi insurgency. However, the Assad regime was also exporting Syrian Islamists into Iraq in order to get rid of them. Moreover, corruption runs rampant in Syria. Islamist groups such as al Qaida tend to be utterly ruthless and well financed, traits that would put them in a position to exploit such corruption.

          That and groups such as AQ and EIJ are notorious for infiltrating military organizations.

          And exactly where did Larry support the Iraq war? I don’t think Larry has been anything other than critical of the decision to go into Iraq.

          • http://noquarterusa.net Larry Johnson

            Fred,
            Thanks. You are correct. I was a critic early on of invading and deposing Saddam. We’ve left ourselves strategically weaker in the region. That one is on Bush. Lola is a fucking idiot.

          • lola828

            You and Larry Johnson need better reading comprehension. I never said Larry Johnson supported the Iraq invasion, although Larry Johnson very well could have supported the invasion of Iraq and that is what he is saying now. I said he guy Bush who he voted for left Iraq in a mess.

            Bullshit that Assad at many levels did not support the Iraq insurgency. Larry Johnson your simplified blame Obama for whatever foreign policy analysis is as good as your economic analysis.

        • Popsmoke

          Don’t flatter yourself. Actually your full of yourself. I just get a kick out of you spoofing this site.

    • Flop_Flipper

      I don’t believe there have been many folks here supporting involvement in Syria. We don’t support McCain’s nonsense. The facts are that we don’t know exactly who the rebels are. We do know that there are factions of Al Qaeda associated groups involved. We may assume that the Alawites will face mass murder should the Muslim Brotherhood aligned rebels have their way. You are an idiot as usual.

      • lola828

        “We do know that there are factions of Al Qaeda associated groups involved.”

        Can you prove that? Can you point to one single piece of evidence or any credible Middle East observer who says that?

        You are the idiot for making such statements.

        Funny you say we do not know who the opposition is and then in the next sentence you say what we do know is that Al Qaeda is part of the opposition. That sounds like an idiotic contradicting statement to me.

        • Flop_Flipper

          I’ll take the King of Jordan’s word for it. Look it up you frickin idiot. Try paying attention for a while. Fuck Off Obot!

        • shelldoll2

          Did you live overseas? You are now an expert in foreign affairs? If not perhaps you should STFU racist idiot..

    • shelldoll2

      Now I am happy. I wrote war scenarios and ran simulations of attacks. Did you? Of course not.

      Been shot at by terrorists and Mr. Johnson was involved in things you can’t even imagine.

      Therefore take your non-involved racist ass and tell us all about it.

      • lola828

        That must make you a middle eastern geopolitical expert. What is it with all the racism accusations? Is that your thing to call everyone you disagree with a racist.

        • shelldoll2

          I know more than you know. Idiots R US. That’s your call sign.

  • HELENK2

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/07/from-aaron-k-in-baghdad.php

    al queda on the rise in Iraq.
    Larry this guy agrees with you on just what is happening in Iraq and how backtrack’s withdrawal plans are totally wrong

  • Eyes Wide Open

    You are correct and I think that it is part of a plan that has been in the making for at least a few months. Not sure if my post got lost or I didn’t post it right. Just listen to what this Syrian living in France told the reporters.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUggbF5bISY

  • Jane Plain
  • HELENK2
  • HELENK2

    off topic, different ME country

    http://freebeacon.com/testimony-u-s-general-blocked-investigation-into-afghan-hospital-abuse-due-to-election/

    US general blocked investigation into afghan hospital abuse due to election

    WTF are we doing in Afghanistan???????

  • HELENK2

    http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/israel-hezbollah-syria-weapons/2012/07/24/id/446370?s=al&promo_code=F8E0-1

    Israel says if syria transfers WMD to hezbollah it would be and act of war.

    Who said syria would transfer weapons??

  • Pingback: Obama in the Dark on Syria : NO QUARTER

  • Eyes Wide Open

    Guess the “rebels” cavalry has arrived, have no fear Al Qqeda is here?

    “We are now forming suicide cells to make jihad in the name of God,”
    said a speaker in the video using the classical Arabic favored by Al
    Qaeda.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/25/world/middleeast/al-qaeda-insinuating-its-way-into-syrias-conflict.html?_r=1&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065