RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

“Don’t agonize. Organize.” – Send a Woman to the White House

Originally posted by Heidi Li at her blog, Heidi Li’s Potpourri.

‘Don’t agonize. Organize.’
- Florynce Kennedy

Right now, many people believe that they will not see a woman elected president of this country in their lifetimes. The estimable Marie Cocco sums the situation up once again. One of my favorite blog writers, Ani, gives us her take.

One can hardly blame people for feeling this way. But, I think it is too early to conclude that we will not see a woman elected president in the next 24 years. So, if you think you have another quarter century in you, not only might you see a woman elected president, you can help make it happen. It won’t happen because it will be easy to accomplish. And it It won’t happen because of hope. It will happen because of hard work in the face of long odds.

It will happen because we challenge ourselves to make it happen’ to make it a national priority. We must recognize that electing a woman to the Presidency of the United States of America is a way of affirming the 51 per cent of the American population consisting of women, a way of affirming that Americans can understand human rights well enough to appreciate that women’s rights are human rights, a way of affirming the great American heritage in promoting the rights of all persons based on ever more inclusive ideas of who counts as a rights-bearing person.

Before you stop reading because you decide this is just going to be a bit of cockeyed optimism or mere exhortation, I will name two concrete ways Americans can challenge themselves to make a woman President within the next 25 years.

I. First, learn about The White House Project. Don’t be put off by the bit on the home page congratulating Obama-Biden. There will be some ideas and aspects of the site you will like more than others, but spend some time at The White House Project, and you will see that this group understands that to put a woman in the White House we, as a nation, are going to have to face down the pervasive misogyny and sexism rampant in the culture and never more in evidence than right now. (In May, Marie Cocco wrote about the phenomenon; now with the talk of Senator Clinton becoming Secretary of State, the public face of misogyny has surged to the forefront again.) Some great pages from the website are here (this page shows that The White House Project understands exactly what we are up against), as does this one. Want to think about leading a political life? Look here. After you investigate, sign up to participate in the group – costs nothing but keeps you involved. Then, use the group’s form to get some friends to sign up.

II. Second, set up your own support/action group, dedicated to challenging yourself and other people to put a woman in the Oval Office by 2034. I think of such a group as a “Send a Woman to the White House” [SWWH] club or partnership. It might start with you and just one other person. But as with exercise, it is easier to stay motivated toward a goal if you do so with some friends and companions. Here are some things SWWH clubs can do:

meet once a week for at least an hour; use the hour to focus on political actions you are taking or want to take; then use the next hour to see how progress is going.

create an investment fund – decide with other members what you can raise per month, and how you can raise it, and pick an organization that is dedicated to women’s rights and particularly their representation as President of the United States of America.

think of fun and social ways to educate yourself (book group on women’s history or building presidential campaigns); walk-a-thons to raise money to donate to women’s rights/interest groups.

let other people know you have set up an SWWH group – and stay in communication with other groups.

take small but direct actions: if you see misogynistic or sexist advertising, boycott the product or service and write the company in question; if your local bookstore or library does not have an extensive collection of nonfiction about women in politics or women’s history, speak to the manager and ask for a better selection; when somebody uses misogynistic or sexist language, tell him or her that you object.

invite a woman you would like to know better or whose work you would to know more about to come meet with your SWWH; she does not have to be famous and the event does not have to be fancy; it can be a coffee for three or an open house for 30.

Yesterday was the anniversary of John F. Kennedy’s assassination. This sorry date did not cause me to dwell on the horror and sadness of life cut too short. Instead, it put me in mind of one of the most admirable things President Kennedy did for this country. He challenged Americans to meet a seemingly impossible challenge: they did. In 1961, President Kennedy addressed the United States Congress urging long-term and continuous funding and commitment to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. President Kennedy did not live to see that goal met in 1969, but the goal would not have been met if he had not issued the Congress and, in another famous address well worth reading and hearing, the American people to invest resources and energy in hitting the mark. So we know that we as a country can attain goals that, when first presented, seem outrageously unreachable.

We may not have a President who will challenge us to put a woman in the Oval Office by 2034, but as American citizens we can issue the challenge to ourselves and to one another. If enough of us start now, we Americans can put a woman in the Oval Office by 2034, just as 40 years ago Americans put a man on the moon.

“We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.”

-John F. Kennedy, Rice University, 1963

My own ambition and commitment: to start an SWWH group and to help anybody else who would like to start one. You can reach me through Heidi Li’s Potpourri for ideas about books to read, groups that might be worth supporting, specific projects you might want to try.

  • elsie

    This is very uplifting for women. I believe that it can happen if only the culture in this country transform into the kind of culture that propels women into leaders. With machismo working so strongly in South American countries, still they are able to recognize that women leaders/politicians have so much to offer that they can not be ignored.. Maria Hinojosa of NOW (PBS) did a great report on women leaders/politicians.. The women in Chile recognized that a woman leader can best help their lives improve. Never mind that the President is a single mother, she understood. People recognized that women are problem solvers and they know that their president will work hard to solve their problems..

    In this United States, the culture is still so far behind in recognizing women’s contribution to society.. I was raised in a different culture outside the United States and when I came here, I struggled to understand the misogynistic attitude of both men and women in this country… But now I learned that as young girls, they are taught to be passive, submissive and be pretty.. I shudder to watch how girls today emulate a Hannah Montana and other characters like her.. Then, there is the princess in distress and knight in shining armor mentality that girls learn as they grow up.. These are just a few of the factors that make it so difficult to validate women’s value in this country.. Name the women who worked hard to achieve power and influence and they are immediately ridiculed and hated and the best examples are: HRC, Martha Stewart, Fiorina and I must admit Oprah had her share of harsh critics when she challenged the beef industry.. Sadly the harshest critics came from other women like MoDo (NYT), Campbell (CNN), Andrea Mitchell, NBC and Katie Couric (CBS) and on and on and on..
    Unless the culture here in the US is transformed, then I can believe that in the next decade we shall see a woman president in this country..

    • SN in MN

      Didn’t the majority of women decide it isn’t important to have a female president? If Sen Clinton wasn’t good enough for these morons, who else could be reasonably considered for the position? Even my feminist mother voted for plastic jesus!
      Young women don’t deserve much consideration, as they have revealed their shallow, fad-following natures during this crucial showdown. If they won’t stick up for themselves, why should the rest of us?

      • http://thenewagenda.net/ Woman Voter

        So, the DNC has set women back at least 26 six years and we won’t see a woman able to make it into the White House until 2034?!?

        I get the intent of the article, but all I could do was cry. Hillary Clinton was the best candidate that just happened to be a woman. No one can every tell me otherwise, ever…

        • http://thenewagenda.net/ Woman Voter

          The worst insult to me is that I have to support this man (Obama) who ran most misogynistic/sexist campaign ever. NO, I have better things to do like work on women’s and children’s issues, they are always the canaries in the mines.

          THE DNC AND OBAMA HAVE SYSTEMATICALLY SET WOMEN BACK DECADES! I can’t forget that…

          • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

            “can’t forget that…” nor forgive the DNC — ever. This is a DEAD party.

            And yes the DNC has set Women back decades and given permission to the misogynists to be more overt with their hatred of women.

            If a women does make it to the white house to CLEAN UP the mess left by the endless string of males — she will NOT be a member of the Democrat party — she will either be a Republican or from a new party.

    • elise

      noquarter, why is someone being allowed to use my username? I didn’t submit this comment.

    • elise

      I don’t know who you are, but I have been posting comments here for months and my name is elise. I sent an email to noquarter asking why this is allowed. I am NOT happy about this and will leave this site if it isn’t corrected. I’m willing to withhold judgement until I receive a reply, but if this is an accident, I’m sure you can see the problem.

  • bert

    elsie – it is not up to the culture to change by itself. It is up to us to change the culture by our words, deeds, and actions. I am reminded of what Robert F. Kennedy said in South Africa in June, 1966 about apartheid:

    “Each time a [person]stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others….he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistence.”

    I am 62 and I want to live long enough to see a woman elected to the Whute House. Yes we can.

    • elsie

      Bert, I am 60 and having immigrated to this country and became a US citizen, it is also my hope that I see a Woman President of the United States.. The dynamics of race relations is different from the dynamics of gender relations. We see violence in both. But when an entire racial group is consistently oppressed, the perception from outside observers is more immediate because the injustices are seen as more compelling..And because of their exposure to the injustices, they rise to oppose it and others outside the country follow.. Civil Rights movement in the US fought hard and they have the support of others opposed to racial segregation……Translate that to gender relations, it is a different ball game because again, the culture as I said does not teach us, does not encourage us or inspire us to change our attitudes, our ideas, our attitudes towards women. Culture will not change by itself.. The people in those cultures ought to change their perception and then we see culture change…

      Great quote from RFK, but to me, RFK had no awareness of the misogyny lurking in the country because race relations is more important.. As a culture we must put a value on gender relations if we ever have a chance of effecting change..

    • pm317

      What surprised me the most about the elections is the lack of dismay at how Hillary was treated in the primary among women and also how they did not recognize this was their chance to nominate a viable and better qualified candidate who also happened to be a woman. They relegated their responsibility/dream to the media and the party. It took Hillary all that experience and stature to even come close to thinking viability, I don’t see another accomplished woman on the horizon unless we take firm action now — recognize talented women and groom them for the position (just like they tried to do with Obama). If they could prop up an Obama, we can certainly do better. But the difficulty will be in finding that one person with raw political instinct and AMBITION, the hunger to want to do this. Hillary had all of that and more.

      • tek

        I agree. There is a real problem with younger women and perhaps with leftist women. They seem content to be subservient to men. If the next president isn’t a woman, we should be out in the streets raising holy he**.

        • http://thenewagenda.net/ Woman Voter

          We have become accustomed to having them wave hangers at us, and we all bind together and submit…to the idea that they are our only choice.

          We have to stop the DNC from using CHOICE as a weapon to keep us in line, its worked so well that they always bring it up.

          That is really why he got in, after they all but took out Senator Hillary Clinton out of the race, even Pelosi said she was going to put a stop to ‘this’… WHAT PUT A STOP ON THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS…WHAT HAPPENED TO ONE PERSON ONE VOTE, WHAT HAPPENED TO VOTING RIGHTS?

        • rw

          I agree. There is a real problem with younger women and perhaps with leftist women.

          Because they have no identity outside of their sexual gratification and their womb, respectively.

          • rw

            OK, that didn’t work, don’t know how to do the bquote tech thingy, sorry.

        • Julia

          with leftist women there is a problem sure!

      • Ani

        There wasn’t a lack of dismay — there was rage — but the MSM never reported it — they splintered and disippated people’s efforts by acting like the rest of us didn’t exist. Still, 3 million Dem supporters of her voted for McCain — most of whom had never before voted for a Republican- that is a big deal.

        The MSM just proved that they pick our presidents — they did it with Bush too.

        We do need to fight back now more than ever.

  • somerset

    I am only interested in sending a Republican woman to the White House…the dems have lost me forever (after 40 years) and Hillary Clinton just lost me with her acceptance of chief flight attendant on the obama plane. I will never forget this election cycle, nor will my husband or children….that’s how you lose a coalition, one family at a time.

    • SJ

      Agree 100%

    • wodiej

      same here…

      • imustprotest

        Yep, me too.

        • Dawnelle

          I will continue voting for who I think is the BEST candidate.

          Not all REPUB females are the same just like not all DEM women are the same.

          I’m mostly done voting for screaming banshees that tell only partial trues on both sides. And get all sanctimonious and full of themselves and their “supposed” righteousness. It’s disgusting. On both sides. Yep I don’t like either of the parties in general any more. Both wandering the wilderness with blinders on imo. Stubborn, Anal, Foolish.

          I feel sorry for ALL of us. (really) Having to waste our time listening to any of them pontificate and spin. blech.

          done ranting
          out ;-)

          • Choo Choo Magoo

            Dawnelle -
            You stated perfectly for me.

            I will continue voting for who I think is the BEST candidate.

            Not all REPUB females are the same just like not all DEM women are the same.

            I’m mostly done voting for screaming banshees that tell only partial trues on both sides. And get all sanctimonious and full of themselves and their “supposed” righteousness. It’s disgusting. On both sides. Yep I don’t like either of the parties in general any more. Both wandering the wilderness with blinders on imo. Stubborn, Anal, Foolish.

            I would even go further and say I will give the edge to women, all things being equal. But I will hold them to the same standard. I think we can prove the power of womenship (women as leaders) with out lowering our standards.

            I don’t think a women as president should be the goal. It should be to prove the power of women in leadership. How women as leaders would enrich, strengthen and enpower all for a better life. Our unique capabilities.

            We must change attitudes first. Women need to admire, inspire and support other women. We are still functioning under the rules of – exceptionalism & every women for herself. We have to stop making deductive comparisions. Until we do, we are doomed to failure.

    • tek

      Then you were never a Hillary supporter in the first place. Anyone who thinks Republican policy (facism) is better for this country than democracy is pat of the problem.

      • HARP

        If you think the Democrats stand for Democracy, you need your meds adjusted.

        • Mert

          Yay!!

      • HC

        I agree we should all vote for the best candidate regardless of party affiliation.

        I get so sick of hearing this:

        “Then you were never a Hillary supporter in the first place.”

        How do you know and who are you to judge?

        • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

          PUMA =

          PARTY

          UNITY

          MY

          Ass

          ——————–

          With this election Dems lost ownership of the women’s vote. The numbers will shift more toward the Independent as the women who were conned leave the party in disgust. (sorry but Senator Clinton helped in the con — and it hurts to say that — but the truth is the truth).

  • hootnannie

    I was born in 1947, and do you think I ever imagined a black person becoming President? I thought that even this very year, Obama’a ethnicity would go a long way in keeping him from the WH.
    I honestly believe that Hillary would have been Dem nominee and then Prez if not for BO’s candidacy. Does anyone think Dems would have voted in Biden, Richardson, or any other man running just because Hillary’s a female? It’s certainly arguable that McCain could have beat her, but I personally believe that she would have defeated him by more votes than Obama did. And, if Hillary had been the Dem nominee, maybe Mac wouldn’t have chosen Palin and could have lost votes by naming someone like his buddy Joe or Flip-Flop Mitt.
    I’ll say again that I think sexism is a problem–and will always be–but that misogyny is not as big a factor in politics as some people think. Before the Obama phenom, Hillary was almost always criticized in terms of being a Clinton and “devisive”. (Even last night, Dick Morris was sputtering that, if there’s a terrorist attack, she’ll jump to put the blame on Obama!)
    Obama became the Dem nominee because his camp was super-organized to win the caucuses, he gained momentum in Iowa, he utilized unethical and illegal tactics, and the DNC pulled out the stops to install him. Otherwise, Hillary would have been running against McCain. Now, maybe sexism would have defeated her there. But I believe it was Obama worship that caused his minions to dig down deep into the very cellar of the human psyche and come up with weapons to use against Hillary and Palin.

    • pm317

      In spite of all advantages, unethical and illegal tactics Obama used, Hillary still won the primary. The sexism (and race baiting) came from Obama minions, media and the party establishment and some people at large participated. Were they using it as a weapon to just defeat her or are they really misogynistic, hard to say. In the end race trumped gender. As a party, the establishment could have been smart about it with a long range focus. The superdelegates could have put both of them on the ticket with Clinton at the top and have the WH for 16 years but now they will be scrambling again after 4 years (and if they think I’ll go back to vote for him in 2012, I say dream on!). The messiah wanted all or nothing now and the SDs caved in.

      • tek

        Yes, this is what I think. Obama was the nominee because of corruption in the DNC supported by Democratic senators who hand picked Obama. I suspect the corporations played a role in it too. All the media is owned by big corporations and they all cheerleaded Obama.

        And people who say they are turned off the the Democrats forever because there was corruption in this primary season, should have a history lesson on George W. Bus elections in 2000 & 2004. If you think the Republicans aren’t congenitally corrupt, then you’re just not thinking and I suspect those people were Republicans going into this election. Reagan’s election against Carter was also completely corrupt. Reagan sold out Americans to get in the WH.

        • Ani

          Yes but this year all the Dems proved is that they are JUST as corrupt. Where does that leave us?

          The hope was to get McCain elected, who is not popular with Repub. neocons and lobbyist hogs and do some reform — rthat would have also brought the Dem party down to its knees to rethink their corruption and abandonment of their core principles. Unfortunately, the economy, the Media worshipfest, some clueless Dems still voting for the messiah and 6 million republicans who decided to sit home had other ideas.

    • wodiej

      Obama also became the Dem nominee because he is black. Let’s face it because that is the cold, hard truth. He’s got no experience to speak of, never led anything, hangs around with a bunch of shady people, attended a racist, radical, American hating church for 20 years, and took millions of illegal donations, many foreign.

      And if sexism is not that big of a problem in politics, then why the attacks on Palin too? You’re damn right it’s a problem. When until this year only one woman was on the national ticket and only 17% of Congress is female, it’s sexism. The good ole’ boys club still think a woman’s place is in the kitchen.

      • jbjd

        Correction: he became the nominee because he is half black and, that half is not native born black but Kenyan black. Better to vote for a half black African than a 100% black American. Didn’t see Madonna or Angelina adopting a domestic black child needing a Mom, did you? (I did; and he is the joy of my life.)

  • wodiej

    We made tremendous ground this year with Hillary as the actual winner for the Democratic nominee and most likely, eventual Presidency and it was stolen from her. We also made huge gains with Sarah Palin as VP and on a Republican ticket. 24 years? I don’t think it will take that long. Women are mad as hell and they’re not getting over it. I know I’m not. Righteous anger? You’re damn right. I love a challenge and this one is just the kind of thing that energizes me.

    • beebop

      Hillary was robbed in plain sight and so little was done to stop it. It was as if a purse was snatched and the crowd parted and allowed the criminal to make his get a way. Then she was derided for speaking up for herself. And she still wiped the slate clean in each and every primary after February. After being told to shut up and sit down. She was mocked, humiliated, given the finger and marginalized. Then just to add insult, told to put him over the top at the convention. I couldn’t watch. When this happens in front of women, what are to to think? Abandon your principles? Forget about it? I don’t agree with everything that Sarah Palin says, but I sure as hell hold her in much higher regard at this moment because from what I saw, she is far better at walking her talk. The McCain people didn’t know how to deal with this outspoken “out of control” woman? That is the best news that came out of that campaign at the end. Stand up for what you believe in even if you are standing alone.

      • tek

        That’s what is disturbing. Both parties have now shoved democracy right out the door and the majority of Americans seem thrilled about it.

        • http://thenewagenda.net/ Woman Voter

          The Great ROBBERY OF DEMOCRACY in 2008!

  • ray

    Thank you, Heidi, for this great article.

    Education is a wonderful thing. I think it is the key to the changes we want, and the classroom is the place to start. Women play a major role in education as teachers, members of the PTA, and as room parents in K-12 schools. Therefore, they have enough influence to make the changes that could pay big dividends in the next 10-20 years–enough to make it possible for a woman to become POTUS.

    Most Americans under the age of 35 know very little about women in our country’s history compared to their greater knowledge of many African American inventors, educators, and others who contributed to our nation’s success. The difference in their knowledge of these two groups is the stress put on Black History Month in February and the lack of interest in Women’s Histoy Month in March. There is very little, if any, study of women in history going on in my area during the month of March. Women have the power to make Women’s History Month important.

    Education, starting in the lower grades, has had a lot to do with the difference in attitudes concerning racism and sexism. I believe racist remarks and racisim in general became more socially unacceptable after Black History Month was started in the schools. It raised the consciousness level of young people. When children of all races learned the important role African Americans played in our history, attitudes started changing. Attitudes have changed to such a degree that it was possible for an African American to become president.

    Attitudes toward women can also be changed by educating the children about women’s significance in history, as well as in today’s world. Women have the power to make sure the schools are doing their part in providing the missing information. Certainly, the self-esteem of girls would improve if they knew about the brave women in history and their accomplishments. Maybe they would be more likely to view a woman as capable of holding the top office if they knew how strong women have always been. Women CAN bring about change. Education is the key.

  • csuzeq

    I do not want a woman in the White House in my lifetime and this is the truth. I have seen how wanting a Black in the white House means any token black will do. No, no, no. If AAs want to shame themselves in that way, go for it. Now your symbol of a successful AA is that you are just handed a free ride because you are black. I do not want that to happen to women. Hillary Clinton was a competent, intelligent, qualified candidate and got treated like crap. The only woman who will be welcomed by the media is the hooter girl with no brains or qualifications, just that it will be “time” to put a woman in and as we have seen once the powers that be decide that, any token candidate will do. This is unacceptable to me. I will not help by pushing some timeline for stupidity. When and if a qualified, competent, intelligent woman comes along, she will get my full support if I believe in her and her policies, but I will not say by such and such a date, we will get a woman because quite frankly, I look at the stupid poiticians who are women now and there is not one I would want to vote for. If there is another Clinton, well, she hasn’t gotten her start yet. Maybe it’s Chelsea. I have no clue, but what I do know is it didn’t take Hillary 5 minutes to become qualified, it took her years. I can think of no one truly qualified now and so I don’t just want the token just because, I want the woman who has earned it. Based on who’s available I am assured that it will not happen in my lifetime and if it does, will not be someone I’ll vote for either. I am 43. I don’t want it if it has to be phoney or any of these pukes in elected office now. They are all nothings, who shouldn’t even hold the office they do now, let alone be promoted to POTUS ever.

    • Choo Choo Magoo

      I agree csuzeq. A woman as president is the wrong goal. Smart, capable, strong women in leadership positions is the right goal. I don’t want us to become men, and simply replace men in leadership. I want to show what we can bring to the table that will enrich life for all. Until society understand why women are an important voice in leadership we are doomed to fail. And we can’t convince others until we recognize it for our selves.

  • tek

    Well, I want a woman in the WH, and I want it to be Hillary and I’m going to write Dick Durbin and whoever replaces Obama everyday and tell them that Hillary had better be the next POTUS.

  • SFIndiePUMA

    I had a conversation last night with my sister (a Hillary supporter who voted for The Pretender) about Hillary as SoS. She was thrilled that Hillary accepted the position, quoted Hillary as saying how much more power she would have as SoS to affect change as opposed to being just a junior senator, and wanted to know how I felt. As soon as I started to explain to her why I wasn’t thrilled, she held up her hands and didn’t want to discuss it any more.

    When I tried to explain to her again why I would never get behind The Pretender she refused to listen. She simply refuses to listen to, be open to, or acknowledge any of the corruption, lies, sexism, misogyny, etc. She simply does not want to see him as he is, and believes all of the accusations against him are either false or irrelevant.

    I know that the media is to blame for much of this. She gets her information (or lack of it) from the MSM. How do we fight that? It’s got to be an organized movement that gets off the internet and into the streets, and it needs a strong leader who is recognizable and – let’s face it – lots of money. There’s a lot of passion from a lot of commenters, a lot of knowledge and a lot of ideas. But it’s a whole lot that’s not going to go anywhere if there’s not an organized, focused center. As long as the MSM remains a government-run entity hiding the truth, promoting sexism and misogyny, and getting away with it, I know I won’t live long enough to see a woman in the White House.

    • csuzeq

      I have the same problem with my boyfriend. He will say, “I have heard all the talking points”. Then he will mention something like he can admit he was wrong about Palin banning books. He just heard CNN tell him it was wrong (of course after the election). I’m like what does that mean? You want me to say I am wrong that Obama should be indicted or I am wrong to think that he ineligible to hold office, or that I am worng that there was caucus fraud? I can back up every claim I have that I claim true, as well as what we don’t know is true, like his involvement in operation board games. If anyone wants me to admit I am wrong, then they will need to indict Odrama and present evidence at trial, otherwise I simply don’t know if it’s true or not! Electing someone does not then mean they haven’t committed a crime, it just means they weren’t caught yet!

      That stupid ass! I hate the mofo Odrama. I really do. He could send us all $1,000,000 stimulus checks and I will still hate that ass!

      • Slobodaneee

        You can call him Odrama all you want. Just make sure to call him President elect. Get over the election already. Some of you with these bogus claims are starting to sound just plan nutty. PUMAs, Fox, and all of hate radio did their best and failed miserably. Most women didn’t fall for your nonsense in 2008 and won’t in 2012.

        • Strawberrybitch

          No. He’s Barky McBigearsSmallPenis and don’t you forget it.

          • Slobodaneee

            He’s also the President-elect and you can’t get over that.

            • WildChild

              there really isn’t much to get over. BOBO isn’t president elect until the electoral collage casts their ballots. But for all our drooling you might not have gotten ahead of yourself like that.

              • Slobodaneee

                Oh yeah, you’re right, but that reminds of the primary. When Obama gathered enough delegates, it was “he’s not the nominee yet!” Now its he is not President-elect yet until the Electoral College meets!”

                • WildChild

                  It was pretty clear BOBO wasn’t the nom after hitting the magic number of delegates and it was made even clearer when we referred to him as the presumed nom until he was actually nominated. At best, all BOBO can be is the presumed president elect until he is actually elected by the electoral college. LOL that is unless you’re a member of Americas drooling classes. If your a drooling class BOBOweenie not only is he the president elect but you’ve also just finished up the bio of his eight years in office. Apparently time works a little differently for you weenies swimming in the kool aid

            • Strawberrybitch

              Uh yeah, I got over Bushy I’ll get over Barky. Hey! How’s that SOS appointment working out for you? That Leon Panetta sure knows how to advise Barky doesn’t he? All those Clintonistas filling Barky’s posts…it’s like the Clinton era all over again sans the actual Clintons. What were you saying about Bill and Hill being racists and corrupt and old politics? Welcome to the center buttmunch.

              • Slobodaneee

                Where did Obama ever say that no one in the Clinton administration could ever serve in his administration? He did talk about ending that type of politics, which he also stated wasn’t entirely clinton’s fault. As far as SOS, I would have preferred others, i.e. Richardson or Kerry, but Obama obviously thinks highly of clinton, something he often stated during the campaign.

                • Strawberrybitch

                  Oh please, you lying sack of cat sick. That wench Michelle herself wanted to scratch Bill’s eyes out…yeah, she and her milktoast husband really like the Clinton’s. Don’t forget the ‘She’s likeable enough’ comment. Barky sold you and the rest of his loathesome followers on hope and change…and he made it clear over and over the Clintons represented the old and corrupt, now to use the best and the brightest the Clintons put together back then is hypocritical, not that YOU would have a problem with either hypocrisy or lying. Par for the course, I’m sure.

                • WildChild

                  bush used to do that too. Send his weenies out week after week to say how easy the iraq war would be. But then he would say it would be a long road. That way they could have it both ways regardless of how things turned out. It appears that BOBO learned well from his master.

                  • Strawberrybitch

                    Yeah and how’d that work out for them. Bush is the worst president EVAH! But I’m sure if we give Barky enough time, he’ll give Chimpy a run for his money.

                    • WildChild

                      BOBO is surly starting out wearing the same shoes that bush brought to washington.

            • http://ezinearticles.com/?Three-Basic-Parenting-Styles&id=744499 Northwest rain

              Yep Obama — the poster child for the fragile male syndrome –

              BIG ears — small penis.

              Poor fragile fella needs a trolls to harass anyone who refuses to fall on their knees to their messiah.

        • WildChild

          you BOBOweeines couldn’t get over the nineties. So don’t be surprised if we don’t take your suggestion of getting over the election very seriously.

  • Sassy

    With all due respect to lifetime activists and to commenters here, I will submit some facts.
    The Rules and Bylaws Committee had numerous women.
    Women elected BO.
    Hillary Clinton endorsed and campaigned for BO.
    Women governors endorsed and campaigned for BO.
    Women senators endorsed and campaigned for BO.
    For every male that bashed Senator Clinton in commentary and on national TV, one can paste a mug shot of a woman beside him.
    I will stay in my own small sphere from now on, with a willing hand for my sisters, mother-in-law, daughter, grand-daughters, and friends and neighbors.
    I have resolved to always try to shoulder part of their load.
    I know how far I have traveled, and it must have been more difficult for those that preceded me, and will likely be difficult for those that follow.

  • johninca

    I think there’s a misconception that strong men are uncomfortable with strong women.

    The British had Margaret Thatcher, the Philippines had Corazon Aquino, and (going back a bit) the Spanish had Isabella, and frankly I’d be ecstatic to have any of those leaders over what we have now.

    If you like lefties, I watched a documentary about Cynthia McKinney once and had a little crush on her.

    Here’s to strong women!

    • Ani

      That is not true — strong men are fine with strong women — weak men who pretend to be strong are the ones who have a problem with strong women.

      The same is true of women — if you are a
      PERSON who is comfortable in your own skin and with your own power, you don’t mind others have any.

      Only insecure people who feel they are somehow diminished when someone else stands tall are the ones who wants to bring someone like Hillary down.

      If you look at the powers that be who supported Hillary all along, their records, their character and behavior vs. the ones who betrayed her at the beginning to support Obama, you will see a very definite pattern — among both the men and the women.

      • johninca

        Yes, strong men are fine with strong women, that’s what I meant. As another example John McCain comes to mind, choosing Gov. Palin for running mate.

  • http://none jessiebritton

    A solid AA vote, a restless student college vote and enough sulking conservative Republican’s voted to put Obama in the White House. The lost of anyone of those groups would have changed the outcome. The solid AA group made the difference in the primaries (North Carolina, South Carolina. Virginia, Mississippi, Louisiana, Etc.) A change of one or two of those states and Hillary would be the nominee. I can understand some women voting for a male candidate, when that candidate is the better qualified, but I can not understand the vote when the candidate is surely less qualified. I know that I will never vote straight party again and will pick and choose.

    • jbjd

      She was the nominee; only, the people who voted for her did not get to forward her name to the S’s of S to get onto the general election ballots.

  • cathnealon

    If there was no caucus fraud, no suppression of the roll call at the convention, no RBC meeting to unseat Michigan and Florida, no ACORN fraud, no credit card website fraud, no strongarm tactics by Chicago thugs and no media takeover spouting sexist smears and using the race card then Hillary would be our President right now. In short, the nomination and consequently the Presidency was stolen from her by very dirty, evil people. We need not just a woman president we need an accomplished, intelligent leader and HRC certainly fit this description.

    • http://noquarter foxyladi14

      AMEN……….

  • Loveharriet

    DEMS HAVE LOST ME FOREVER! Independent All The Way!

  • witness08

    Thank you Heidi and NQ for a great article.

    The corruption of the DNC, the blatant media bias, the sexism and misogyny in our culture were made so apparent for those of us who weren’t blinded by adoration for Obama. The Democratic party is dead to me.
    We need change and not just the slogan. One area that we can focus on is to create zero tolerance for sexism and misogyny. We can each start at home with the education of our youngsters by being role models and vocal opponents of the sexism perpetrated by our culture.
    Will we see a woman as president of our country in our lifetime? I would be satisfied with the most qualified person regardless of gender. I would like to see Hillary Clinton in the role as SOS because I’d like to see her with a global role.
    I also still have the hope that we can one day refer to her as “Madame President”.

    on another note.
    Greta Van Susteren calls out David Letterman for his sexist comments about Sarah Palin.
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,455829,00.html