RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

John Brennan, Good Riddance [Tony Lake -- Update]

UPDATE: I am willing to bet the Obama folks are not real thrilled with Tony Lake today. I have learned that Mr. Lake, who served as Bill Clinton’s first National Security Advisor and was a failed nominee to head the CIA, is responsible for introducing John Brennan, Jamie Miscik, and John McLaughlin to the Obama inner circle.

Brennan and Miscik both worked with Lake during the latter’s tenure at the White House. As I reported earlier with respect to Miscik, I am told by sources with firsthand knowledge that she had a role in recommending the bombing of the aspirin factory in Sudan in August 1998 in the aftermath of the bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Brennan, Miscik, and McLaughlin are symbols of the failures of intelligence analysis during the Bush Admnistration. They are not the symbols that an Obama team should be saddled with if it wants to hone its image for competence an judiciousness in intelligence matters. End UPDATE.

Let’s give the Barack Obama transition team its due. They are studiously steering clear of trying to replicate the Bush Administration. I am particularly cheered by the demise of John Brennan for any senior position in the Obama Administration. I guess I am one of those “lefty” bloggers whose clamoring (see here) persuaded Brennan and the Obama team that a confirmation process would be ugly. We also featured a post by Mel Goodman who shared my view that Brennan was part of the intel team that helped enable the Bush Administration’s fiasco in Iraq.

Brennan did a preemptive strike yesterday with this disingenuous missive:
withdrawalletter

Brennan’s biggest disqualifier in my view was his inclination to pander to the policymakers. As I pointed out in an earlier article he quickly ascended the career ladder because of his performance as a briefer of George W. Bush. He was part of the George Tenet “be-a-buddy-of-the-president” club. As such he did not speak truth to power. He told the powerful what they wanted to hear.

And he was sloppy and careless. The errors in the Patterns of Global Terrorism report for 2003 were a direct consequence of his shop failing to include almost two months of data. When your job is to count terrorism events how in the world do you allow that kind of miscue?

Here is what we need as head of the CIA. First, you want someone who is financially independent. You do not want someone in that chair who needs the job or believes it is the best job they have ever had. George Tenet used the job as a springboard to become a millionaire. Along the way he told the President about the “slam dunk” case for going to war in Iraq.

Second, you need someone who can tell the President bad news and present intelligence that undermines an administration’s pet policy priorities. Brennan’s claim in his letter that he opposed the most despicable Bush policies–e.g., preemptive war in Iraq and coercive interrogation policies–is a joke. Brennan was part of Tenet’s crew. Brennan strongly defended Tenet’s tenure at CIA. And Brennan was a deputy of Tenet’s when the decisions about coercive interrogation were made. Let’s recall that Brennan came to Tenet’s defense when I, along with several former intelligence officers, called on Tenet to return his medal of freedom and donate a portion of the proceeds from his book to the families who lost a loved one in Iraq. So much for Brennan’s “opposition” to Bush policies.

Brennan, in my view, is a quintessential bureaucratic creature of Washington. He was an enabler of George W. Bush. He was not the most important player in this regard but he was a senior cog in the bureaucracy who, if he had spoken out at the time, could have made a difference. Brennan is not a bad person, he is a weak person. And we do not need a weak person running any facet of the intelligence community. The chief intelligence officers need to be men and women who are above politics. We do not need partisans. We need people committed to telling the truth even if it means political suicide.

  • I’m a Linda too

    That letter confirms that he DID want a position in the O-shit! administration and O-shit! probably would have confirmed him, especiallly given he was on his transition team. So kudos to you, Larry, and Mel, for shining a light and most likely a good reason he is not going to have a home in the O-shit! administration.

  • fiscalliberal

    As I think about it, I do not remember panderers getting any where in the Clinton White house. Part of that is some one who can handle diversity and I think Bill and Hillary are people who have no time for panderers.

    To this point Obama is very scripted and we have not seen how he reacts to truth. We have seen hme stumble and mumble when Hillary got him off script.

    • jbjd

      Yes, we have. (This is the first thing I thought of when I read the article espousing the new head of the CIA must be able to speak truth to power.) He doesn’t handle truth well. Remember when HRC got the finger and the brush-off because George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson confronted BO with truths about his disastrous prescriptions for economic recovery; and his acquaintance with an unrepentant terrorist?

    • I’m a Linda too

      Which is confirmed by the reports shared that Hillary received a call from John Kerry for a presidential endorsement if she promised him SOS. When she wouldn’t make such a promise, (and we know Billie Boy Richardson wanted to be Hillary’s VP if she won the nomination, but Hillary refused that as well) he quickly decided O-shit! was worthy of his endorsement. I agree that they obviously share similar qualities and lack of integrity, but I never counted that as an winning quality for the presidency.

      • http://www.myspace.com/isomer_69 LAUREN in Texas

        Karma is a bitch. Richardson was a worm towards Hillary and I think it is hilarious that he was second, NOT first choice for Commerce Secretary. Penny Pritzker was Obama’s first choice and she turned it down.

        • I’m a Linda too

          so true! lol

          I think O should give him the rumored position of Ambassador to China.

    • LetterfromLouisville

      Well, I for one was never crazy about Dick Morris. That guy is all over the place. And now he’s completely turned on them, in the ugliest way.

    • Mary

      As I think about it, I do not remember panderers getting any where in the Clinton White house.

      ——-

      Because Bill Clinton is so smart, IMO you really couldn’t get BS past him, and being able to craft solutions, he wasn’t intimidated by the things he saw.

      And I think he respected intelligence, as he himself liked a strong give and take around policy.

      Clinton respected the Constitution, I wish I could say the same about the others.

      Personally, I think Obama is not familiar with the document, despite his legal education, and Cheney and Bush, and the rest, ought to go to prison.

      Or the Hague.

  • Rob G in Chicago

    Excellent post, Mr. Johnson. I noted the admonition that we can’t afford weak persons in this post, and it brought to mind the folks who called Bush, Sr. a wimp. I might not have agreed with all of his politics, but I would not have considered a former fighter pilot and CIA director a wimp (who would want to call Putin a wimp ?) Not to invite you out on a limb, but do you have a short list of recommendations and endorsements for the post ?

  • bob

    I wonder if Obama is going to have gravy or cranberry sauce with his turkey tomorrow. He’s a bit of a health nut so probably cranberry sauce. But will it be canned or fresh. I await the answer with baited breath. Come on CNN.

    • Jackarooty

      More importantly, what will Michelle be wearing?
      Breaking news…

  • http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/ Not Your sweetie

    I dunno how clear it’s stirring: Robert Gates?
    And they are adopting now the GOP term for the economy
    http://edgeoforever.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/semantics-alert-its-recovery-instead-of-stimulus/

    • Zee

      Exactly! lol — steering clear of replicating Bush’s team?

      Um….he’s *keeping* Bush’s team on defense!

      Great timing….right before Thanksgiving. Something to shove in the face of any Obot relative who brings up the Precious. Ask how that “change” is coming along.

      I’m disappointed. I came in here to see if anyone had been to any of the Obot sites to report how they’re taking the Robert Gates news.

      • getfitnow

        I don’t trust him or his team-plain and simple. when word got out he was considering Larry Summers for Treasury, that was nipped just to find out that Mr. Summers will be seving as WH advisor. My question is why the consideration in the first place?

        • Mary

          Obama is pay to play, I would look, there, first.

      • CentralMass

        Gates wasn’t Bush’s Jr’s guy. Someone with a brain picked him after they lost the mid-term and Rumsfeld got pushed out.

        Gates seemed to make a positive impact almost immediately.

        • Ferd Berfle

          Gates certainly did make aa difference. I don’t know who in the administration sponsored him but I’m glad they did.

  • bob

    Perhaps the Obamas will spend Christmas in Hawaii. Obama can wear a jaunty Santa hat as he passes out the gifts to Malia and Sasha. Afterward they can all go bodysurfing.

    • Mirlo

      The girls don’t get gifts, remember?

      • Baba Rum Raisin

        Not even on Kwanza?

  • LetterfromLouisville

    Good analysis of the situation, Larry.

  • Doc99

    Blaming Tenet while praising Clinton is a bit disingenous. Both Tenet and Clarke were convinced of Saddam’s weapons. Both were wrong. While I too have issues with pre-emptive war, the intel didn’t change substantially from Clinton to Bush. And I would have given Tenet the boot, not a Medal of Freedom. Please show me where I’m wrong.

    • fiscalliberal

      I don’t remember Clark blaming Sadam for 911. I think he clearly went to Osama for that. Clark clearly told Bush that Sadam was not the reason for 911.

      • Doc99

        Nor did Bush … However, Clarke did agree the strike on the Aspirin Factory in Sudan was justified as he also thought Osama would “Boogie to Baghdad.”

        I’m happy that the transition from Bush to Obama seems to be more adult than the transition from Clinton to Bush went. The rancor following the election of 2000 may have contributed to the lack of focus on the threat of al Qaeda. Just my opinion. I could be wrong.

  • Steve_in_KC

    Larry, I always take your posts on these matters as most authoritative and honest assessments I have access to.

    I agree with you that a good intelligence officer should have a firm grasp of the evidence and the concensus of his peers, above and below his rank. If he truly believes in the concensus, he should stand with them unwaveringly. But if he has doubts or believes the others are wrong, he should stand that ground and defend it as the truth he believes, regardless of personal consequences. I don’t mean that he should be dramatic about it and threaten to quit if he’s not taken seriously, but he should be prepared to make that sort of ultimatum if his beliefs are strong. And by all means, military and intelligence should be non-partisan and non-political.

  • bob

    I wonder what color drapes Obama’s gonna put in his office. Wine? Sky blue? Forest green?

    When Obama was in his prime I bet he averaged 18 points per game.

    • I’m a Linda too

      If michelle has her way, it will be organge or red-no doubt, maybe dark purple. Her favorite colors, which don’t suit her well at all. I hope someone finally got that through to her.

    • Jackarooty

      More importantly, what will Michelle be wearing?
      Breaking news…

      • bob

        Michael Kors green, cashmere muffler, Kenneth Cole red, cable-knit sweater, DKNY blue jeans and Anne Klein black boots.

        With a jaunty Santa hat.

        • Baba Rum Raisin

          Expect Angela Davis to become her favorite designer.

    • wodiej

      yesterday you were railing on someone because you thought that Obama begging for donations was irrelevant to the financial crisis. Today you are talking about what color drapes Obama will put in the WH and how many points he might score a game. Are you a TROLL??

      • bob

        Thanksgiving is tomorrow so lighten up, Francis.

  • wodiej

    I wouldn’t say the Obama transition team deserves kudos when the only reason they didn’t pick Brennan was because they didn’t want a nasty scene.

    AS for Brennan being weak, sloppy and careless but not a “bad” person, going along w Bush policies that got innocent people and soldiers killed, maimed and tortured, qualifies someone as a bad person in my book.

    • I’m a Linda too

      good point. The kudos belong to Larry and Mel. :)

  • bob

    On second thought, the Obamas will probably eat tofurkey. Gotta stay fit. Don’t want to end up getting heart surgery like Bill after eight years.

  • Sassy

    John Bolton did his share of damage and meddling during those days as well.
    We need a method of weeding and resowing…without losing quality.
    D.C. is too “incestuous” to get the job done though!

  • TeakWoodKite

    Rand Beers has joined the transition team along with Richard Clarke.

    What of them?

    Brennan will go back to having his contract employees browse the passport files of VIP and others over at Foggy Bottom and Langley.

  • stodgie

    it seems we need a steady hand. we don’t need the off with their heads “church” attitude of the 70s and we don’t need “take their rights attitude” of the bush era. so much for changey dopey attitudes. bots, you have been had. admit it and get out of our hair. thanks